6119 matches found
CVE-2018-13654
The CVE-2018-13654 entry concerns ESTSToken, an Ethereum token. The vulnerability is in the mintToken function of its smart contract, described as an integer overflow that lets the contract owner set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. Documents confirm this root cause and the affected comp...
CVE-2018-13631
The CVE-2018-13631 entry concerns a vulnerability in the doccoin Ethereum token smart contract where the mintToken function contains an integer overflow. This overflow enables the contract owner to arbitrarily set any user’s balance to a chosen value, representing an integrity risk for balances i...
CVE-2018-13770
Summary (CVE-2018-13770) : The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for UltimateCoin (Ethereum token) contains an integer overflow that lets the contract owner set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. This indicates a vulnerability in the token contract’s arithmetic handling...
CVE-2018-13603
The CVE-2018-13603 entry concerns Briant2Token, an Ethereum token, where the mintToken function in its smart contract has an integer overflow. This vulnerability lets the contract owner set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value, exposing a risk of manipulation of token balances. The connected ...
CVE-2018-13764
CVE-2018-13764 describes an integer overflow in the mintToken function of the BiquToken Ethereum smart contract, enabling the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. The vulnerability is rooted in improper arithmetic handling within mintToken, allowing value manipulation t...
CVE-2018-13753
CVE-2018-13753 concerns the mintToken function of a smart-contract implementation for DeWeiSecurityServiceToken (an Ethereum token). The vulnerability is an integer overflow in mintToken that could let the contract owner set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. This is described in the ...
CVE-2018-13506
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for SDR22, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13590
The CVE-2018-13590 entry concerns SIPCOIN’s smart contract mintToken function, where an integer overflow in the mintToken implementation enables the contract owner to arbitrarily set any user’s balance. Affected product: SIPCOIN Ethereum token contract; vulnerable component: mintToken (integer ov...
CVE-2018-13663
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for BSCToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13581
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for TravelCoin TRV, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13656
CVE-2018-13656 affects a smart contract for Sample Token (STK) with Contract Name cashBackMintable. The mintToken function contains an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value. This results in potential integrity impact (HIGH per CVSSv3)...
CVE-2018-13607
The CVE-2018-13607 entry concerns ResidualShare, an Ethereum token whose smart contract contains an integer overflow in the mintToken function. This vulnerability allows the contract owner to assign any value to a user’s balance, enabling arbitrary credit manipulation within the token’s accountin...
CVE-2018-13630
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for DoccoinPreICO, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13584
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for yasudem, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13649
The CVE-2018-13649 entry concerns a vulnerability in a smart contract implementing Deploy, an Ethereum token. The issue is in the mintToken function, where an integer overflow allows the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value. This represents a critical integrity risk for ...
CVE-2018-13554
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for MoneyTree TREE, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13731
CVE-2018-13731 concerns the mintToken function of a smart contract for the Ethereum token TokenMACHU. The vulnerability is an integer overflow that allows the contract owner to set any user’s balance to an arbitrary value. The description and linked sources indicate the impact is on balances cont...
CVE-2018-13777
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for RRToken, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13655
The mintToken function of a smart contract implementation for GFC, an Ethereum token, has an integer overflow that allows the owner of the contract to set the balance of an arbitrary user to any value...
CVE-2018-13470
The CVE-2018-13470 entry concerns an integer overflow in the mintToken function of a BuyerToken smart contract (an Ethereum token). The vulnerability allows the contract owner to set an arbitrary user’s balance to any value, as described in multiple sources (e.g., NVD/CNVD/CVE records) and linked...