CVE-2026-78663

The HTTP/2 server can refund connection-level flow control twice for the same data: Once when a client resets a stream refunding data for any sent-but-unread portion of the stream, and again when a request handler reads the buffered data. A malicious client can exploit this to bypass the configur...

CVE-2026-94439

When an HTTP server handler sends a 2xx response to an HTTP/1 CONNECT request and returns without hijacking the connection, the server improperly continues to read and serve requests from the connection. Since a 2xx response to an HTTP/1 CONNECT converts the connection into a tunnel, the server...

CVE-2026-78663 Double flow control refund on HTTP/2 server streams in net/http

The HTTP/2 server can refund connection-level flow control twice for the same data: Once when a client resets a stream refunding data for any sent-but-unread portion of the stream, and again when a request handler reads the buffered data. A malicious client can exploit this to bypass the configur...

CVE-2026-78660

Historically, we have been rather lax about malformed framing-related headers in our HTTP/2 implementation, as they cannot interfere with HTTP/2 framing. However, this makes it possible for our HTTP/2 implementation to forward responses containing such headers to an HTTP/1 client when acting as a...

CVE-2026-78669 Excessive CPU consumption from repeated initial window changes in net/http

A malicious HTTP/2 peer can cause excessive CPU consumption in the client or server by opening a large number of streams and then sending many small SETTINGS frames containing SETTINGSINITIALWINDOWSIZE values...

CVE-2026-78667

The FileServer(FS) , ServeContent , and ServeFile(FS) components are vulnerable to a CPU exhaustion issue. This occurs when parsing a Range header that contains a large number of small ranges, leading to excessive resource consumption. This vulnerability is associated with CWE-770 (Allocation of ...

CVE-2026-78660 HTTP/2 transport accepts malformed framing-related headers in net/http

Historically, we have been rather lax about malformed framing-related headers in our HTTP/2 implementation, as they cannot interfere with HTTP/2 framing. However, this makes it possible for our HTTP/2 implementation to forward responses containing such headers to an HTTP/1 client when acting as a...

CVE-2026-78667 Lack of limit on size of parsed Range headers in net/http

When parsing a Range header containing a large number of small ranges, FileServerFS, ServeContent, and ServeFileFS can consume an excessive amount of CPU...

CVE-2026-94439 HTTP/1 server connection desynchronization after 2xx CONNECT response in net/http

When an HTTP server handler sends a 2xx response to an HTTP/1 CONNECT request and returns without hijacking the connection, the server improperly continues to read and serve requests from the connection. Since a 2xx response to an HTTP/1 CONNECT converts the connection into a tunnel, the server...

CVE-2026-94439

When an HTTP server handler sends a 2xx response to an HTTP/1 CONNECT request and returns without hijacking the connection, the server improperly continues to read and serve requests from the connection. Since a 2xx response to an HTTP/1 CONNECT converts the connection into a tunnel, the server...

CVE-2026-94439

When an HTTP server handler sends a 2xx response to an HTTP/1 CONNECT request and returns without hijacking the connection, the server improperly continues to read and serve requests from the connection. Since a 2xx response to an HTTP/1 CONNECT converts the connection into a tunnel, the server...

CVE-2026-94439 HTTP/1 server connection desynchronization after 2xx CONNECT response in net/http

When an HTTP server handler sends a 2xx response to an HTTP/1 CONNECT request and returns without hijacking the connection, the server improperly continues to read and serve requests from the connection. Since a 2xx response to an HTTP/1 CONNECT converts the connection into a tunnel, the server...

CVE-2026-78663

The HTTP/2 server can refund connection-level flow control twice for the same data: Once when a client resets a stream refunding data for any sent-but-unread portion of the stream, and again when a request handler reads the buffered data. A malicious client can exploit this to bypass the configur...

CVE-2026-94439

An HTTP server handler is vulnerable to request smuggling because it improperly handles HTTP/1 CONNECT requests. When the handler sends a 2xx response without hijacking the connection, it fails to stop treating the connection as HTTP, even though it has been converted into a tunnel. This discrepa...

CVE-2026-56866 HTTP/1 client connection desynchronization after CONNECT rejection in net/http

When http.Transport sends an HTTP/1 CONNECT request with a non-empty Request.Body, it writes the body directly to the connection without framing after the request headers. If the server rejects the CONNECT request with a non-2xx keep-alive response, Transport returns the connection to the idle...

CVE-2026-78659

When "Trailer" headers are sent by a client, the HTTP server internally uses the header values to populate the Request.Trailer map passed to the server handler. Because Request.Trailer is a map, each entry incurs memory overhead. For HTTP/2 servers, a malicious client can exploit this by sending ...

CVE-2026-78659 HTTP/2 server memory exhaustion due to Trailer headers in net/http

When "Trailer" headers are sent by a client, the HTTP server internally uses the header values to populate the Request.Trailer map passed to the server handler. Because Request.Trailer is a map, each entry incurs memory overhead. For HTTP/2 servers, a malicious client can exploit this by sending ...

CVE-2026-56866

The http.Transport component is vulnerable to a desynchronization issue when handling HTTP/1 CONNECT requests with a non-empty Request.Body . The underlying cause is that the transport writes the body directly to the connection without framing; if a server rejects the request with a non-2xx keep-...

CVE-2026-78659

An HTTP server is vulnerable to an asymmetric resource consumption attack via HTTP/2 "Trailer" headers. A malicious client can send a large number of fields within a "Trailer" header, forcing the server to allocate a disproportionate amount of memory because the Request.Trailer map incurs memory ...

CVE-2026-78659 HTTP/2 server memory exhaustion due to Trailer headers in net/http

When "Trailer" headers are sent by a client, the HTTP server internally uses the header values to populate the Request.Trailer map passed to the server handler. Because Request.Trailer is a map, each entry incurs memory overhead. For HTTP/2 servers, a malicious client can exploit this by sending ...