11572 matches found
MINI-R39R-42PG-WC9G
Bulletin has no description...
MINI-5CQH-HV9R-7GWV
Bulletin has no description...
MINI-GGX6-H5WV-2P84
Bulletin has no description...
MINI-QW56-CQ4P-7GHG
Bulletin has no description...
CGA-G37X-4PMF-GGVC
Bulletin has no description...
ECHO-5A4D-F9A3-722E
Bulletin has no description...
MINI-CCJ6-WGRJ-94V7
Bulletin has no description...
MINI-2FGJ-RJG5-4665
Bulletin has no description...
ECHO-2327-9760-E268 Claimed out-of-bounds write in dlx_rtype_to_howto() (bfd/elf32-dlx.c), reached from elf32_dlx_info_to_howto_rel() via the relocation type of a crafted ELF/DLX object. The DLX backend is not built. dlx_elf32_be_vec is selected only by the dlx-*-elf target triple (bfd/config.bfd), and that vec is the sole trigger for compiling elf32-dlx.lo (bfd/configure.ac); debian/rules passes an explicit per-architecture --enable-targets list and never --enable-targets=all. Verified against the shipped amd64 and arm64 debs: libbfd exports no dlx symbols, `objdump -b elf32-dlx` returns "invalid bfd target", `ld -m elf32dlx` is an unrecognised emulation, and a crafted EM_DLX (0x5aa5) object carrying relocation types past the end of the howto table is claimed by the generic elf32-big backend, which reports "architecture: UNKNOWN!" and every relocation as UNKNOWN. The function is never entered. Note that readelf prints DLX machine and relocation names from its own tables, independent of BFD, so its output is not evidence of the backend being present. Upstream also rejects the finding on its merits, even with DLX enabled. On the Red Hat bug that Debian's tracker carries as its only reference, maintainer Andrew Burgess concludes "I don't believe that this is actually a bug": DLX relocation types are a contiguous 0-9, not the non-contiguous space with extended types at 0x10000+ that the advisory describes; dlx_rtype_to_howto() already rejects r_type >= R_DLX_max (10); and types 6-9 have their own case arms, so the indexed access can only ever reach 0-5 of the 6-entry dlx_elf_howto_table. Patrick Monnerat adds that the advisory claims an out-of-bounds write while the procedure performs no indexed write at all. Both observations hold against the 2.45.50.20251201 source. Debian marks it unimportant (binutils not covered by security support) and ships no fix in any suite including forky/sid, so there is nothing to bump.
Bulletin has no description...
MINI-VCWV-G96J-292J
Bulletin has no description...
MINI-P3C5-VFJ9-VXGP
Bulletin has no description...
MINI-FV9W-23Q2-CQ24
Bulletin has no description...
MINI-Q799-6JRW-X69Q
Bulletin has no description...
MINI-RHRF-W8RW-CRVP
Bulletin has no description...
MINI-XR2H-CJHC-988P
Bulletin has no description...
MINI-HV54-V5W6-XQ6J
Bulletin has no description...
MINI-PW9J-XX6G-6G5M
Bulletin has no description...
CGA-CF9C-V9MM-XC44
Bulletin has no description...