Lucene search
K

InstallShield DLL Hijacking

🗓️ 25 Feb 2016 00:00:00Reported by Stefan KanthakType 
packetstorm
 packetstorm
🔗 packetstormsecurity.com👁 34 Views

InstallShield DLL Hijacking vulnerability in executable installers. Remote code execution, privilege escalation, and unsafe temporary file usage. Mitigation: Avoid executable installers, turn off UAC privilege elevation

Code
`Hi @ll,  
  
executable installers [°] created with InstallShield (see  
<http://www.flexerasoftware.com/producer/products/software-installation/installshield-software-installer/>  
alias <http://installshield.com/>) are vulnerable:  
  
1. Their wrappers/self-extractors load and execute a rogue/bogus/  
malicious RichEd32.dll ['] (and other DLLs too, dependent on  
the version of Windows) eventually found in the directory they  
are started from (the "application directory").  
  
For software downloaded with a web browser this is typically the  
"Downloads" directory: see  
<https://insights.sei.cmu.edu/cert/2008/09/carpet-bombing-and-directory-poisoning.html>,  
<http://blog.acrossecurity.com/2012/02/downloads-folder-binary-planting.html>  
and <http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2012/Aug/134>  
  
If RichEd32.dll et. al. get(s) planted in the "Downloads"  
directory per "drive-by download" this vulnerability becomes a  
remote code execution.  
  
Due to an application manifest embedded in the executable which  
specifies "requireAdministrator" or the "installer detection" (see  
<https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd835540.aspx#BKMK_InstDet>)  
of Windows' "user account control" executable installers are  
typically started with administrative privileges ("protected"  
administrators are prompted for consent, unprivileged standard  
users are prompted for an administrator password); execution of  
RichEd32.dll et. al. then results in an escalation of privilege!  
  
2. They extract their payload to an unsafe temporary (sub)directory  
"%TEMP%\pft<4_hex_digits>~tmp\" and load it (resp. process it)  
from there [²].  
  
These files can be overwritten or compromised by an unprivileged  
user after extraction and before they are used.  
  
If such an executable installer is distributed per software  
deployment system (for example WSUS) it is run under "LocalSystem"  
account.  
  
Processes running under "LocalSystem" account use the global  
%TEMP% directory %SystemRoot%\Temp where EVERY (unprivileged)  
user can create (or overwrite) files and conduct an attack on  
any file created there.  
  
For a recent example of such a vulnerability see  
<https://code.google.com/p/google-security-research/issues/detail?id=440>  
  
3. Their payload (the "real" installer) resp. its Setup.exe loads and  
executes the rogue/bogus/malicious UXTheme.dll, ProfAPI.dll, SxS.dll,  
MSI.dll, LZ32.dll, Version.dll ['] (and other DLLs too, dependent  
on the version of Windows) eventually found in the directory they  
are started from (the "application directory", which is typically  
an unsafe temporary (sub)directory "%TEMP%\pft<4_hex_digits>~tmp\").  
  
  
  
Proof of concept/demonstration:  
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  
  
1. visit <http://home.arcor.de/skanthak/sentinel.html>, download  
<http://home.arcor.de/skanthak/download/SENTINEL.DLL> and save  
it as RichEd32.dll in your "Downloads" directory;  
  
2. download Realtek's High Definition Audio Codecs  
<http://12244.wpc.azureedge.net/8012244/drivers/rtdrivers/pc/audio/0006-32bit_Win7_Win8_Win81_Win10_R279.exe>  
(via <http://www.realtek.com/downloads/>) and save it in your  
"Downloads" directory;  
  
3. execute 0006-32bit_Win7_Win8_Win81_Win10_R279.exe from your  
"Downloads" directory;  
  
4. notice the message box displayed from RichEd32.dll placed in  
step 1.  
  
  
Mitigation(s):  
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~  
  
0. DON'T USE EXECUTABLE INSTALLERS [°]!  
  
If your favourite applications are not distributed in the native  
installer package format of the resp. target platform: ask^WURGE  
their vendors/developers to provide native installation packages.  
If they don't: dump these applications, stay away from such cruft!  
  
1. Turn off UAC's privilege elevation for standard users and installer  
detection for all users:  
  
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\System]  
"ConsentPromptBehaviorUser"=dword:00000000 ; Automatically deny elevation requests  
"EnableInstallerDetection"=dword:00000000  
  
See <https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd835564.aspx#BKMK_RegistryKeys>  
  
2. NEVER execute files in UNSAFE directories (like "Downloads" and  
and "%TEMP%")!  
  
3. Deny execution (at least) in the "Downloads" directories and all  
"%TEMP%" directories and their subdirectories:  
  
* Add the NTFS ACE "(D;OIIO;WP;;;WD)" meaning "deny execution of  
files in this directory for everyone, inheritable to all files  
in all subdirectories" (use CACLS.EXE /S:<SDDL> for example);  
  
* Use "software restriction policies" resp. AppLocker.  
  
Consider to apply either/both to every "%USERPROFILE%" as well as  
"%ALLUSERSPROFILE%" alias %ProgramData%" and "%PUBLIC%": Windows  
doesn't place executables in these directories and beyond.  
  
See <http://home.arcor.de/skanthak/safer.html> as well as  
<http://mechbgon.com/srp/> plus  
<http://csrc.nist.gov/itsec/SP800-68r1.pdf>,  
<https://www.nsa.gov/ia/_files/os/win2k/application_whitelisting_using_srp.pdf>  
or <https://books.google.de/books?isbn=1437914926> and finally  
<http://www.asd.gov.au/infosec/top35mitigationstrategies.htm>!  
  
  
stay tuned  
Stefan Kanthak  
  
  
PS: see <http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2015/Nov/101> (resp. the  
not yet finished <http://home.arcor.de/skanthak/!execute.html>)  
for more details!  
  
PPS: the case numbers are not in chronological order.  
  
  
[°] Self-extracting archives and executable installers are flawed^W  
b(rainde)ad in concept and dangerous in practice.  
  
DON'T USE SUCH CRUFT!  
ALWAYS use the resp. target platforms native package and archive  
format.  
  
For Windows these are .INF (plus .CAB) and .MSI (plus .CAB),  
introduced 20 years ago (with Windows 95 and Windows NT4) resp.  
16 years ago (with Office 2000).  
  
Both .INF and .MSI are "opened" by programs residing in  
%SystemRoot%\System32\ which are therefore immune to this kind  
of "DLL and EXE Search Order Hijacking" attack.  
Since both .INF and .MSI access the contents of .CAB directly  
they eliminate the attack vector "unsafe temporary directory"  
too.  
  
['] A well-known (trivial, easy to exploit and easy to avoid)´and  
well-documented vulnerability: see  
<https://capec.mitre.org/data/definitions/471.html>,  
<https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/2269637.aspx>,  
<https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff919712.aspx> and  
<https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms682586.aspx>  
  
[²] Another well-known (trivial, easy to exploit and easy to avoid)  
and well-documented vulnerability: see  
<https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/377.html>,  
<https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/379.html>,  
<https://capec.mitre.org/data/definitions/27.html>,  
<https://capec.mitre.org/data/definitions/29.html> ...  
`

Data

Build on a solid foundation with Vulners data

We provide the essential building blocks for cybersecurity solutions with comprehensive, structured, and constantly updated vulnerability and exploits data

Api

Power your application with Vulners API

The Vulners REST API offers reliable, high-performance access to vulnerability intelligence, with 99.9% SLA uptime and CDN-backed data delivery for seamless global access

App

Assess and manage vulnerabilities with Vulners tools

Built on top of Vulners' database and SDK, end-user solutions give security professionals and developers lightweight and powerful tools for vulnerability remediation