Lucene search
K

Cisco SQL Injection

🗓️ 03 May 2011 00:00:00Reported by vsecurity.comType 
packetstorm
 packetstorm
🔗 packetstormsecurity.com👁 34 Views

Cisco SQL Injection vulnerability in version 7.1.3.32900-4 allows unauthorized access to user records without error message

Related
Code
ReporterTitlePublishedViews
Family
ATTACKERKB
CVE-2011-1610
3 May 201122:55
attackerkb
Cisco
Cisco Unified Communications Manager Potential SQL Injection Vulnerability
27 Apr 201115:10
cisco
Check Point Advisories
Cisco Unified Communications Manager Multiple SQL Injections (CVE-2011-1610)
19 Jul 201100:00
checkpoint_advisories
CVE
CVE-2011-1610
3 May 201122:00
cve
Cvelist
CVE-2011-1610
3 May 201122:00
cvelist
EUVD
EUVD-2011-1610
7 Oct 202500:30
euvd
NVD
CVE-2011-1610
3 May 201122:55
nvd
Prion
Sql injection
3 May 201122:55
prion
securityvulns
Cisco Security Advisory: Multiple Vulnerabilities in Cisco Unified Communications Manager
27 Apr 201100:00
securityvulns
securityvulns
ZDI-11-143: Cisco Unified CallManager xmldirectorylist.jsp SQL Injection Vulnerability
1 May 201100:00
securityvulns
Rows per page
`  
Hello,  
  
VSR independently discovered this SQL injection flaw (CVE-2011-1610)  
and reported it to Cisco on November 11, 2010. Since we had very  
limited time to preform testing on the product, and because Cisco  
informed us that another researcher had reported the same flaw shortly  
before us, we decided not to write a formal advisory.  
  
However, I would like to add some additional technical information for  
those who need to test for this flaw to determine if they are  
vulnerable.   
  
During our tests on version 7.1.3.32900-4 of the product, we found  
that SQL query errors generated by attacks causes the vulnerable JSP  
script to return no records, but does not present any error message.  
To confirm the injection existed, the result from the following two  
query URLs were compared:  
  
/ccmcip/xmldirectorylist.jsp?f=vsr'||0/1%20OR%201=1))%20--  
  
/ccmcip/xmldirectorylist.jsp?f=vsr'||1/0%20OR%201=1))%20--  
  
The first URL returns a very large record set (likely all user  
records) while the second query returns no records. The only  
difference between the two being the order in which '0' and '1' appear  
in the query, with the latter generating a divide-by-zero error. It  
is likely that a simpler test case can be developed, but this is what  
we came up with during very limited testing. We did not explore  
injections on the l and n parameters.  
  
Thank you,  
tim  
  
http://www.vsecurity.com/  
  
`

Data

Build on a solid foundation with Vulners data

We provide the essential building blocks for cybersecurity solutions with comprehensive, structured, and constantly updated vulnerability and exploits data

Api

Power your application with Vulners API

The Vulners REST API offers reliable, high-performance access to vulnerability intelligence, with 99.9% SLA uptime and CDN-backed data delivery for seamless global access

App

Assess and manage vulnerabilities with Vulners tools

Built on top of Vulners' database and SDK, end-user solutions give security professionals and developers lightweight and powerful tools for vulnerability remediation

03 May 2011 00:00Current
0.3Low risk
Vulners AI Score0.3
EPSS0.02518
34