The GovernorCompatibilityBravo
module may lead to the creation of governance proposals that execute function calls with incorrect arguments due to bad ABI encoding. This happens if the proposal is created using explicit function signatures, e.g. a proposal to invoke the function foo(uint256)
is created as propose([target], [0], ["foo(uint256)"], ["0x00..01"])
. If the function selector is provided as part of the encoded proposal data the issue is not present, e.g. the same proposal is created as propose([target], [0], ["0x2fbebd3800..01"])
, where 2fbebd38
is the function selector.
We’ve assessed the instances of this contract found on chain, and did not find any occurrence of this bug in the past. Proposal creation through Tally or OpenZeppelin Defender is not affected. The core Governor
contract on its own is not affected.
A fix is included in version v4.4.2 of @openzeppelin/contracts
and @openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable
.
Do not create proposals using explicit function signatures. Instead, use the propose
function without the signatures
argument, and create the proposal using the fully ABI-encoded function call including the function selector in the calldatas
argument as explained above.
https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/issues/3099
This issue was identified and reported by @GeraldHost.
If you have any questions, comments, or need assistance regarding this advisory, email us at [email protected].
To submit security reports please use our bug bounty on Immunefi.