Lucene search

K
nvd416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67NVD:CVE-2021-46935
HistoryFeb 27, 2024 - 10:15 a.m.

CVE-2021-46935

2024-02-2710:15:07
CWE-668
416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
web.nvd.nist.gov
linux kernel
binder
vulnerability
fixed
4.13
async_free_space
accounting
patch
security issue
async transaction
payload restrictions
cve-2021-46935

5.5 Medium

CVSS3

Attack Vector

LOCAL

Attack Complexity

LOW

Privileges Required

LOW

User Interaction

NONE

Scope

UNCHANGED

Confidentiality Impact

HIGH

Integrity Impact

NONE

Availability Impact

NONE

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

5.3 Medium

AI Score

Confidence

High

0.0004 Low

EPSS

Percentile

10.4%

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

binder: fix async_free_space accounting for empty parcels

In 4.13, commit 74310e06be4d (“android: binder: Move buffer out of area shared with user space”)
fixed a kernel structure visibility issue. As part of that patch,
sizeof(void *) was used as the buffer size for 0-length data payloads so
the driver could detect abusive clients sending 0-length asynchronous
transactions to a server by enforcing limits on async_free_size.

Unfortunately, on the “free” side, the accounting of async_free_space
did not add the sizeof(void *) back. The result was that up to 8-bytes of
async_free_space were leaked on every async transaction of 8-bytes or
less. These small transactions are uncommon, so this accounting issue
has gone undetected for several years.

The fix is to use “buffer_size” (the allocated buffer size) instead of
“size” (the logical buffer size) when updating the async_free_space
during the free operation. These are the same except for this
corner case of asynchronous transactions with payloads < 8 bytes.

Affected configurations

NVD
Node
linuxlinux_kernelRange4.14.04.14.261
OR
linuxlinux_kernelRange4.15.04.19.224
OR
linuxlinux_kernelRange4.20.05.4.170
OR
linuxlinux_kernelRange5.5.05.10.90
OR
linuxlinux_kernelRange5.11.05.15.13

5.5 Medium

CVSS3

Attack Vector

LOCAL

Attack Complexity

LOW

Privileges Required

LOW

User Interaction

NONE

Scope

UNCHANGED

Confidentiality Impact

HIGH

Integrity Impact

NONE

Availability Impact

NONE

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

5.3 Medium

AI Score

Confidence

High

0.0004 Low

EPSS

Percentile

10.4%