Lucene search
+L

CentOS Linux 7 [TuxCare] Security Update: openssl11 / openssl11-devel / openssl11-libs / openssl11-static Multiple Vulnerabilities (CENTOS7:CLSA-2026:1780683040)

🗓️ 01 Oct 2026 00:00:00Reported by TenableType 
nessus
 nessus
🔗 www.tenable.com👁 2 Views

Multiple vulnerabilities in openssl11 packages lead to buffer overflow or DoS.

Related
Refs
Code
ReporterTitlePublishedViews
Family
ibm
IBM Security Bulletins
Security Bulletin: IBM Watson Explorer affected by vulnerability in OpenSSL
30 Jun 202313:51
–ibm
ibm
IBM Security Bulletins
Security Bulletin: IBM MQ for HP NonStop Server is affected by OpenSSL vulnerability CVE-2021-3711
15 Nov 202102:21
–ibm
ibm
IBM Security Bulletins
Security Bulletin: Multiple Security Vulnerabilities were identified in IBM Security Verify Access.
17 Jan 202415:16
–ibm
ibm
IBM Security Bulletins
Security Bulletin: IBM Watson Speech Services Cartridge for IBM Cloud Pak for Data is vulnerable to multiple Operator package issues
30 Nov 202318:45
–ibm
ibm
IBM Security Bulletins
Security Bulletin:Multiple Security Vulnerabilities fixed in Openssl as shipped with IBM Security Verify products (CVE-2021-3711, CVE-2021-3712)
5 Nov 202117:17
–ibm
ibm
IBM Security Bulletins
Security Bulletin: IBM i is affected by multiple vulnerabilities in OpenSSL
17 Mar 202621:40
–ibm
ibm
IBM Security Bulletins
Security Bulletin: IBM Rational Build Forge 8.0.0.25 addresses multiple vulnerabilities
24 Nov 202313:49
–ibm
ibm
IBM Security Bulletins
Security Bulletin: IBM QRadar Wincollect is vulnerable to using components with known vulnerabilities
24 Jul 202317:54
–ibm
ibm
IBM Security Bulletins
Security Bulletin: IBM Spectrum Control is vulnerable to multiple weaknesses related OpenSSL
6 Oct 202307:46
–ibm
ibm
IBM Security Bulletins
Security Bulletin: IBM Cognos Analytics has addressed multiple vulnerabilities (CVE-2022-34339, CVE-2021-3712, CVE-2021-3711, CVE-2021-4160, CVE-2021-29425, CVE-2021-3733, CVE-2021-3737, CVE-2022-0391, CVE-2021-43138, CVE-2022-24758)
26 Mar 202502:27
–ibm
Rows per page
#%NASL_MIN_LEVEL 80900
##
# (C) Tenable, Inc.
##

include('compat.inc');

if (description)
{
  script_id(361388);
  script_version("1.1");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_modification_date", value:"2026/10/01");

  script_cve_id(
    "CVE-2021-3711",
    "CVE-2022-3996",
    "CVE-2023-0464",
    "CVE-2025-69419",
    "CVE-2025-69421",
    "CVE-2026-28387",
    "CVE-2026-28388",
    "CVE-2026-28389",
    "CVE-2026-28390"
  );
  script_xref(name:"CLSA", value:"2026:1780683040");

  script_name(english:"CentOS Linux 7 [TuxCare] Security Update: openssl11 / openssl11-devel / openssl11-libs / openssl11-static Multiple Vulnerabilities (CENTOS7:CLSA-2026:1780683040)");

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"synopsis", value:
"The CentOS Linux host is missing one or more security updates.");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"description", value:
"The CentOS Linux 7 host has packages installed that are affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the
TuxCare CENTOS7:CLSA-2026:1780683040 advisory.

  - In order to decrypt SM2 encrypted data an application is expected to call the API function
    EVP_PKEY_decrypt(). Typically an application will call this function twice. The first time, on entry, the
    out parameter can be NULL and, on exit, the outlen parameter is populated with the buffer size
    required to hold the decrypted plaintext. The application can then allocate a sufficiently sized buffer
    and call EVP_PKEY_decrypt() again, but this time passing a non-NULL value for the out parameter. A bug
    in the implementation of the SM2 decryption code means that the calculation of the buffer size required to
    hold the plaintext returned by the first call to EVP_PKEY_decrypt() can be smaller than the actual size
    required by the second call. This can lead to a buffer overflow when EVP_PKEY_decrypt() is called by the
    application a second time with a buffer that is too small. A malicious attacker who is able present SM2
    content for decryption to an application could cause attacker chosen data to overflow the buffer by up to
    a maximum of 62 bytes altering the contents of other data held after the buffer, possibly changing
    application behaviour or causing the application to crash. The location of the buffer is application
    dependent but is typically heap allocated. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1l (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1k).
    (CVE-2021-3711)

  - If an X.509 certificate contains a malformed policy constraint and policy processing is enabled, then a
    write lock will be taken twice recursively. On some operating systems (most widely: Windows) this results
    in a denial of service when the affected process hangs. Policy processing being enabled on a publicly
    facing server is not considered to be a common setup. Policy processing is enabled by passing the
    `-policy' argument to the command line utilities or by calling the `X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_policies()'
    function. Update (31 March 2023): The description of the policy processing enablement was corrected based
    on CVE-2023-0466. (CVE-2022-3996)

  - Issue summary: Calling PKCS12_get_friendlyname() function on a maliciously crafted PKCS#12 file with a
    BMPString (UTF-16BE) friendly name containing non-ASCII BMP code point can trigger a one byte write before
    the allocated buffer. Impact summary: The out-of-bounds write can cause a memory corruption which can have
    various consequences including a Denial of Service. The OPENSSL_uni2utf8() function performs a two-pass
    conversion of a PKCS#12 BMPString (UTF-16BE) to UTF-8. In the second pass, when emitting UTF-8 bytes, the
    helper function bmp_to_utf8() incorrectly forwards the remaining UTF-16 source byte count as the
    destination buffer capacity to UTF8_putc(). For BMP code points above U+07FF, UTF-8 requires three bytes,
    but the forwarded capacity can be just two bytes. UTF8_putc() then returns -1, and this negative value is
    added to the output length without validation, causing the length to become negative. The subsequent
    trailing NUL byte is then written at a negative offset, causing write outside of heap allocated buffer.
    The vulnerability is reachable via the public PKCS12_get_friendlyname() API when parsing attacker-
    controlled PKCS#12 files. While PKCS12_parse() uses a different code path that avoids this issue,
    PKCS12_get_friendlyname() directly invokes the vulnerable function. Exploitation requires an attacker to
    provide a malicious PKCS#12 file to be parsed by the application and the attacker can just trigger a one
    zero byte write before the allocated buffer. For that reason the issue was assessed as Low severity
    according to our Security Policy. The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected by this
    issue, as the PKCS#12 implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary. OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4,
    3.3, 3.0 and 1.1.1 are vulnerable to this issue. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not affected by this issue.
    (CVE-2025-69419)

  - Issue summary: Processing a malformed PKCS#12 file can trigger a NULL pointer dereference in the
    PKCS12_item_decrypt_d2i_ex() function. Impact summary: A NULL pointer dereference can trigger a crash
    which leads to Denial of Service for an application processing PKCS#12 files. The
    PKCS12_item_decrypt_d2i_ex() function does not check whether the oct parameter is NULL before
    dereferencing it. When called from PKCS12_unpack_p7encdata() with a malformed PKCS#12 file, this parameter
    can be NULL, causing a crash. The vulnerability is limited to Denial of Service and cannot be escalated to
    achieve code execution or memory disclosure. Exploiting this issue requires an attacker to provide a
    malformed PKCS#12 file to an application that processes it. For that reason the issue was assessed as Low
    severity according to our Security Policy. The FIPS modules in 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.3 and 3.0 are not affected
    by this issue, as the PKCS#12 implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary. OpenSSL 3.6,
    3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are vulnerable to this issue. (CVE-2025-69421)

  - Issue summary: An uncommon configuration of clients performing DANE TLSA-based server authentication, when
    paired with uncommon server DANE TLSA records, may result in a use-after-free and/or double-free on the
    client side. Impact summary: A use after free can have a range of potential consequences such as the
    corruption of valid data, crashes or execution of arbitrary code. However, the issue only affects clients
    that make use of TLSA records with both the PKIX-TA(0/PKIX-EE(1) certificate usages and the DANE-TA(2)
    certificate usage. By far the most common deployment of DANE is in SMTP MTAs for which RFC7672 recommends
    that clients treat as 'unusable' any TLSA records that have the PKIX certificate usages. These SMTP (or
    other similar) clients are not vulnerable to this issue. Conversely, any clients that support only the
    PKIX usages, and ignore the DANE-TA(2) usage are also not vulnerable. The client would also need to be
    communicating with a server that publishes a TLSA RRset with both types of TLSA records. No FIPS modules
    are affected by this issue, the problem code is outside the FIPS module boundary. (CVE-2026-28387)

Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version
number.");
  # https://security.tuxcare.com/csaf/v2/els_os/centos7els/advisories/2026/clsa-2026_1780683040.json
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"http://www.nessus.org/u?5a6d5ba1");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"https://cve.tuxcare.com/els/releases/CLSA-2026:1780683040");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"solution", value:
"Update the affected packages based on the guidance in TuxCare advisory CENTOS7:CLSA-2026:1780683040.");
  script_set_cvss_base_vector("CVSS2#AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P");
  script_set_cvss_temporal_vector("CVSS2#E:POC/RL:OF/RC:C");
  script_set_cvss3_base_vector("CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H");
  script_set_cvss3_temporal_vector("CVSS:3.0/E:P/RL:O/RC:C");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"cvss4_vector", value:"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"cvss4_threat_vector", value:"CVSS:4.0/E:P");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"cvss_score_source", value:"CVE-2021-3711");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"cvss4_score_source", value:"CVE-2022-3996");

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploitability_ease", value:"Exploits are available");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploit_available", value:"true");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"vendor_severity", value:"Critical");

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"vuln_publication_date", value:"2021/08/24");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"patch_publication_date", value:"2026/06/05");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_publication_date", value:"2026/10/01");

  script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_type", value:"local");
  script_set_attribute(attribute:"generated_plugin", value:"current");
  script_end_attributes();

  script_category(ACT_GATHER_INFO);
  script_family(english:"CentOS Local Security Checks");

  script_copyright(english:"This script is Copyright (C) 2026 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.");

  script_dependencies("ssh_get_info2.nasl");
  script_require_keys("Host/OS/extended-third-party", "Host/local_checks_enabled", "Host/CentOS/release", "Host/CentOS/rpm-list");

  exit(0);
}
include('rpm2.inc');

var third_party_support = get_kb_item('Host/OS/extended-third-party');
if (empty_or_null(third_party_support) || third_party_support != 'TuxCare') exit(0, 'TuxCare support not enabled.');

if (!get_kb_item('Host/local_checks_enabled')) audit(AUDIT_LOCAL_CHECKS_NOT_ENABLED);
var os_product = get_kb_item('installed_os/local/SSH/0/product');
if (isnull(os_product) || 'CentOS Linux' >!< os_product) audit(AUDIT_OS_NOT, 'CentOS Linux');
var os_version = get_kb_item('installed_os/local/SSH/0/version');
if (isnull(os_version)) audit(AUDIT_UNKNOWN_APP_VER, 'CentOS Linux');
if (! preg(pattern:"^7([^0-9]|$)", string:os_version)) audit(AUDIT_OS_NOT, 'CentOS Linux 7', 'CentOS Linux ' + os_version);

if (!get_kb_item('Host/CentOS/rpm-list')) audit(AUDIT_PACKAGE_LIST_MISSING);

var cpu = get_kb_item('Host/cpu');
if (isnull(cpu)) audit(AUDIT_UNKNOWN_ARCH);
if ('x86_64' >!< cpu) audit(AUDIT_LOCAL_CHECKS_NOT_IMPLEMENTED, 'CentOS Linux', cpu);


var constraints = [
  {
    'release': '7',
    'pkgs': [
      {'reference':'openssl11-1.1.1k-7.el7.tuxcare.els1', 'cpu':'x86_64', 'rpm_spec_vers_cmp':TRUE, 'epoch':'1'},
      {'reference':'openssl11-devel-1.1.1k-7.el7.tuxcare.els1', 'cpu':'x86_64', 'rpm_spec_vers_cmp':TRUE, 'epoch':'1'},
      {'reference':'openssl11-libs-1.1.1k-7.el7.tuxcare.els1', 'cpu':'x86_64', 'rpm_spec_vers_cmp':TRUE, 'epoch':'1'},
      {'reference':'openssl11-static-1.1.1k-7.el7.tuxcare.els1', 'cpu':'x86_64', 'rpm_spec_vers_cmp':TRUE, 'epoch':'1'}
    ]
  }
];

var os_release = get_one_kb_item('installed_os/local/SSH/0/release');
var os_sp = get_one_kb_item('Host/*/minor_release');

var flag = 0;
var reference;
var sp;
var _cpu;
var el_string;
var rpm_spec_vers_cmp;
var epoch;
var allowmaj;
var exists_check;
var cves;
foreach var constraint ( constraints ) {
  # Check that the target release is equal to the affected release
  if (!empty_or_null(constraint['release'])){
    if (constraint['release'] != os_release) continue;
  }
  if (!empty_or_null(constraint['sp'])){
    if (constraint['sp'] != os_sp) continue;
  }
  foreach var pkg ( constraint['pkgs'] ) {
    reference = NULL;
    sp = NULL;
    _cpu = NULL;
    el_string = NULL;
    rpm_spec_vers_cmp = NULL;
    epoch = NULL;
    allowmaj = NULL;
    exists_check = NULL;
    cves = NULL;
    if (!empty_or_null(pkg['reference'])) reference = pkg['reference'];
    if (!empty_or_null(pkg['sp'])) sp = pkg['sp'];
    if (!empty_or_null(pkg['cpu'])) _cpu = pkg['cpu'];
    if (!empty_or_null(pkg['el_string'])) el_string = pkg['el_string'];
    if (!empty_or_null(pkg['rpm_spec_vers_cmp'])) rpm_spec_vers_cmp = pkg['rpm_spec_vers_cmp'];
    if (!empty_or_null(pkg['epoch'])) epoch = pkg['epoch'];
    if (!empty_or_null(pkg['allowmaj'])) allowmaj = pkg['allowmaj'];
    if (!empty_or_null(pkg['exists_check'])) exists_check = pkg['exists_check'];
    if (!empty_or_null(pkg['cves'])) cves = pkg['cves'];
    if (reference &&
        ## (no known rpm to check OR known rpm_exists)
        (!exists_check || rpm_exists(rpm:exists_check)) &&
        rpm_check(sp:sp, cpu:_cpu, reference:reference, epoch:epoch, el_string:el_string, rpm_spec_vers_cmp:rpm_spec_vers_cmp, allowmaj:allowmaj, cves:cves)) flag++;
  }
}


if (flag)
{
  security_report_v4(
      port       : 0,
      severity   : SECURITY_HOLE,
      extra      : rpm_report_get()
  );
  exit(0);
}
else
{
  var tested = pkg_tests_get();
  if (tested) audit(AUDIT_PACKAGE_NOT_AFFECTED, tested);
  else audit(AUDIT_PACKAGE_NOT_INSTALLED, 'openssl11 / openssl11-devel / openssl11-libs / openssl11-static');
}

Data

Build on a solid foundation with Vulners data

We provide the essential building blocks for cybersecurity solutions with comprehensive, structured, and constantly updated vulnerability and exploits data

Api

Power your application with Vulners API

The Vulners REST API offers reliable, high-performance access to vulnerability intelligence, with 99.9% SLA uptime and CDN-backed data delivery for seamless global access

App

Assess and manage vulnerabilities with Vulners tools

Built on top of Vulners' database and SDK, end-user solutions give security professionals and developers lightweight and powerful tools for vulnerability remediation

01 Oct 2026 00:00Current
7.2High risk
Vulners AI Score7.2
CVSS 27.5
CVSS 3.18.1 - 9.8
EPSS0.87816
SSVC
2