The remote SUSE Linux SLED15 / SLED_SAP15 / SLES15 / SLES_SAP15 host has packages installed that are affected by multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the SUSE-SU-2022:2306-1 advisory.
The c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool.
Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1o (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1n).
Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2ze (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zd). (CVE-2022-1292)
The function OCSP_basic_verify
verifies the signer certificate on an OCSP response. In the case where the (non-default) flag OCSP_NOCHECKS is used then the response will be positive (meaning a successful verification) even in the case where the response signing certificate fails to verify. It is anticipated that most users of OCSP_basic_verify
will not use the OCSP_NOCHECKS flag. In this case the OCSP_basic_verify
function will return a negative value (indicating a fatal error) in the case of a certificate verification failure. The normal expected return value in this case would be 0. This issue also impacts the command line OpenSSL ocsp application. When verifying an ocsp response with the
-no_cert_checks option the command line application will report that the verification is successful even though it has in fact failed. In this case the incorrect successful response will also be accompanied by error messages showing the failure and contradicting the apparently successful result. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). (CVE-2022-1343)
The OpenSSL 3.0 implementation of the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite incorrectly uses the AAD data as the MAC key.
This makes the MAC key trivially predictable. An attacker could exploit this issue by performing a man-in- the-middle attack to modify data being sent from one endpoint to an OpenSSL 3.0 recipient such that the modified data would still pass the MAC integrity check. Note that data sent from an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint to a non-OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint will always be rejected by the recipient and the connection will fail at that point. Many application protocols require data to be sent from the client to the server first.
Therefore, in such a case, only an OpenSSL 3.0 server would be impacted when talking to a non-OpenSSL 3.0 client. If both endpoints are OpenSSL 3.0 then the attacker could modify data being sent in both directions. In this case both clients and servers could be affected, regardless of the application protocol. Note that in the absence of an attacker this bug means that an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint communicating with a non-OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint will fail to complete the handshake when using this ciphersuite. The confidentiality of data is not impacted by this issue, i.e. an attacker cannot decrypt data that has been encrypted using this ciphersuite - they can only modify it. In order for this attack to work both endpoints must legitimately negotiate the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite. This ciphersuite is not compiled by default in OpenSSL 3.0, and is not available within the default provider or the default ciphersuite list. This ciphersuite will never be used if TLSv1.3 has been negotiated. In order for an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint to use this ciphersuite the following must have occurred: 1) OpenSSL must have been compiled with the (non-default) compile time option enable-weak-ssl-ciphers 2) OpenSSL must have had the legacy provider explicitly loaded (either through application code or via configuration) 3) The ciphersuite must have been explicitly added to the ciphersuite list 4) The libssl security level must have been set to 0 (default is 1) 5) A version of SSL/TLS below TLSv1.3 must have been negotiated 6) Both endpoints must negotiate the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite in preference to any others that both endpoints have in common Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). (CVE-2022-1434)
The OPENSSL_LH_flush() function, which empties a hash table, contains a bug that breaks reuse of the memory occuppied by the removed hash table entries. This function is used when decoding certificates or keys. If a long lived process periodically decodes certificates or keys its memory usage will expand without bounds and the process might be terminated by the operating system causing a denial of service.
Also traversing the empty hash table entries will take increasingly more time. Typically such long lived processes might be TLS clients or TLS servers configured to accept client certificate authentication. The function was added in the OpenSSL 3.0 version thus older releases are not affected by the issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). (CVE-2022-1473)
In addition to the c_rehash shell command injection identified in CVE-2022-1292, further circumstances where the c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection were found by code review. When the CVE-2022-1292 was fixed it was not discovered that there are other places in the script where the file names of certificates being hashed were possibly passed to a command executed through the shell. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.4 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1p (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1o). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zf (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2ze). (CVE-2022-2068)
AES OCB mode for 32-bit x86 platforms using the AES-NI assembly optimised implementation will not encrypt the entirety of the data under some circumstances. This could reveal sixteen bytes of data that was preexisting in the memory that wasn’t written. In the special case of in place encryption, sixteen bytes of the plaintext would be revealed. Since OpenSSL does not support OCB based cipher suites for TLS and DTLS, they are both unaffected. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.5 (Affected 3.0.0-3.0.4). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1q (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1p). (CVE-2022-2097)
Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application’s self-reported version number.
##
# (C) Tenable, Inc.
#
# The package checks in this plugin were extracted from
# SUSE update advisory SUSE-SU-2022:2306-1. The text itself
# is copyright (C) SUSE.
##
include('compat.inc');
if (description)
{
script_id(162965);
script_version("1.6");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_modification_date", value:"2023/07/14");
script_cve_id(
"CVE-2022-1292",
"CVE-2022-1343",
"CVE-2022-1434",
"CVE-2022-1473",
"CVE-2022-2068",
"CVE-2022-2097"
);
script_xref(name:"SuSE", value:"SUSE-SU-2022:2306-1");
script_name(english:"SUSE SLED15 / SLES15 Security Update : openssl-3 (SUSE-SU-2022:2306-1)");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"synopsis", value:
"The remote SUSE host is missing one or more security updates.");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"description", value:
"The remote SUSE Linux SLED15 / SLED_SAP15 / SLES15 / SLES_SAP15 host has packages installed that are affected by
multiple vulnerabilities as referenced in the SUSE-SU-2022:2306-1 advisory.
- The c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection. This
script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is automatically executed. On such
operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the privileges of the script. Use of
the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the OpenSSL rehash command line tool.
Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1o (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1n).
Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2ze (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2zd). (CVE-2022-1292)
- The function `OCSP_basic_verify` verifies the signer certificate on an OCSP response. In the case where
the (non-default) flag OCSP_NOCHECKS is used then the response will be positive (meaning a successful
verification) even in the case where the response signing certificate fails to verify. It is anticipated
that most users of `OCSP_basic_verify` will not use the OCSP_NOCHECKS flag. In this case the
`OCSP_basic_verify` function will return a negative value (indicating a fatal error) in the case of a
certificate verification failure. The normal expected return value in this case would be 0. This issue
also impacts the command line OpenSSL ocsp application. When verifying an ocsp response with the
-no_cert_checks option the command line application will report that the verification is successful even
though it has in fact failed. In this case the incorrect successful response will also be accompanied by
error messages showing the failure and contradicting the apparently successful result. Fixed in OpenSSL
3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). (CVE-2022-1343)
- The OpenSSL 3.0 implementation of the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite incorrectly uses the AAD data as the MAC key.
This makes the MAC key trivially predictable. An attacker could exploit this issue by performing a man-in-
the-middle attack to modify data being sent from one endpoint to an OpenSSL 3.0 recipient such that the
modified data would still pass the MAC integrity check. Note that data sent from an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint
to a non-OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint will always be rejected by the recipient and the connection will fail at
that point. Many application protocols require data to be sent from the client to the server first.
Therefore, in such a case, only an OpenSSL 3.0 server would be impacted when talking to a non-OpenSSL 3.0
client. If both endpoints are OpenSSL 3.0 then the attacker could modify data being sent in both
directions. In this case both clients and servers could be affected, regardless of the application
protocol. Note that in the absence of an attacker this bug means that an OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint
communicating with a non-OpenSSL 3.0 endpoint will fail to complete the handshake when using this
ciphersuite. The confidentiality of data is not impacted by this issue, i.e. an attacker cannot decrypt
data that has been encrypted using this ciphersuite - they can only modify it. In order for this attack to
work both endpoints must legitimately negotiate the RC4-MD5 ciphersuite. This ciphersuite is not compiled
by default in OpenSSL 3.0, and is not available within the default provider or the default ciphersuite
list. This ciphersuite will never be used if TLSv1.3 has been negotiated. In order for an OpenSSL 3.0
endpoint to use this ciphersuite the following must have occurred: 1) OpenSSL must have been compiled with
the (non-default) compile time option enable-weak-ssl-ciphers 2) OpenSSL must have had the legacy provider
explicitly loaded (either through application code or via configuration) 3) The ciphersuite must have been
explicitly added to the ciphersuite list 4) The libssl security level must have been set to 0 (default is
1) 5) A version of SSL/TLS below TLSv1.3 must have been negotiated 6) Both endpoints must negotiate the
RC4-MD5 ciphersuite in preference to any others that both endpoints have in common Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.3
(Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). (CVE-2022-1434)
- The OPENSSL_LH_flush() function, which empties a hash table, contains a bug that breaks reuse of the
memory occuppied by the removed hash table entries. This function is used when decoding certificates or
keys. If a long lived process periodically decodes certificates or keys its memory usage will expand
without bounds and the process might be terminated by the operating system causing a denial of service.
Also traversing the empty hash table entries will take increasingly more time. Typically such long lived
processes might be TLS clients or TLS servers configured to accept client certificate authentication. The
function was added in the OpenSSL 3.0 version thus older releases are not affected by the issue. Fixed in
OpenSSL 3.0.3 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2). (CVE-2022-1473)
- In addition to the c_rehash shell command injection identified in CVE-2022-1292, further circumstances
where the c_rehash script does not properly sanitise shell metacharacters to prevent command injection
were found by code review. When the CVE-2022-1292 was fixed it was not discovered that there are other
places in the script where the file names of certificates being hashed were possibly passed to a command
executed through the shell. This script is distributed by some operating systems in a manner where it is
automatically executed. On such operating systems, an attacker could execute arbitrary commands with the
privileges of the script. Use of the c_rehash script is considered obsolete and should be replaced by the
OpenSSL rehash command line tool. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.4 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3). Fixed in
OpenSSL 1.1.1p (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1o). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2zf (Affected 1.0.2-1.0.2ze). (CVE-2022-2068)
- AES OCB mode for 32-bit x86 platforms using the AES-NI assembly optimised implementation will not encrypt
the entirety of the data under some circumstances. This could reveal sixteen bytes of data that was
preexisting in the memory that wasn't written. In the special case of in place encryption, sixteen bytes
of the plaintext would be revealed. Since OpenSSL does not support OCB based cipher suites for TLS and
DTLS, they are both unaffected. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.5 (Affected 3.0.0-3.0.4). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1q
(Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1p). (CVE-2022-2097)
Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version
number.");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1185637");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1199166");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1199167");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1199168");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1199169");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1200550");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"https://bugzilla.suse.com/1201099");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"https://lists.suse.com/pipermail/sle-updates/2022-July/023781.html");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-1292");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-1343");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-1434");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-1473");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-2068");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-2097");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"solution", value:
"Update the affected libopenssl-3-devel, libopenssl3 and / or openssl-3 packages.");
script_set_cvss_base_vector("CVSS2#AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C");
script_set_cvss_temporal_vector("CVSS2#E:F/RL:OF/RC:C");
script_set_cvss3_base_vector("CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H");
script_set_cvss3_temporal_vector("CVSS:3.0/E:F/RL:O/RC:C");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"cvss_score_source", value:"CVE-2022-2068");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploitability_ease", value:"Exploits are available");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploit_available", value:"true");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"vuln_publication_date", value:"2022/05/03");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"patch_publication_date", value:"2022/07/06");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_publication_date", value:"2022/07/08");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_type", value:"local");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"cpe", value:"p-cpe:/a:novell:suse_linux:libopenssl-3-devel");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"cpe", value:"p-cpe:/a:novell:suse_linux:libopenssl3");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"cpe", value:"p-cpe:/a:novell:suse_linux:openssl-3");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"cpe", value:"cpe:/o:novell:suse_linux:15");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"generated_plugin", value:"current");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"stig_severity", value:"I");
script_end_attributes();
script_category(ACT_GATHER_INFO);
script_family(english:"SuSE Local Security Checks");
script_copyright(english:"This script is Copyright (C) 2022-2023 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.");
script_dependencies("ssh_get_info.nasl");
script_require_keys("Host/local_checks_enabled", "Host/cpu", "Host/SuSE/release", "Host/SuSE/rpm-list");
exit(0);
}
include('rpm.inc');
if (!get_kb_item('Host/local_checks_enabled')) audit(AUDIT_LOCAL_CHECKS_NOT_ENABLED);
var os_release = get_kb_item("Host/SuSE/release");
if (isnull(os_release) || os_release !~ "^(SLED|SLES)") audit(AUDIT_OS_NOT, "SUSE");
var os_ver = pregmatch(pattern: "^(SLE(S|D)(?:_SAP)?\d+)", string:os_release);
if (isnull(os_ver)) audit(AUDIT_UNKNOWN_APP_VER, 'SUSE');
os_ver = os_ver[1];
if (! preg(pattern:"^(SLED15|SLED_SAP15|SLES15|SLES_SAP15)$", string:os_ver)) audit(AUDIT_OS_NOT, 'SUSE SLED15 / SLED_SAP15 / SLES15 / SLES_SAP15', 'SUSE (' + os_ver + ')');
if (!get_kb_item("Host/SuSE/rpm-list")) audit(AUDIT_PACKAGE_LIST_MISSING);
var cpu = get_kb_item('Host/cpu');
if (isnull(cpu)) audit(AUDIT_UNKNOWN_ARCH);
if ('x86_64' >!< cpu && cpu !~ "^i[3-6]86$" && 's390' >!< cpu && 'aarch64' >!< cpu) audit(AUDIT_LOCAL_CHECKS_NOT_IMPLEMENTED, 'SUSE (' + os_ver + ')', cpu);
var service_pack = get_kb_item("Host/SuSE/patchlevel");
if (isnull(service_pack)) service_pack = "0";
if (os_ver == "SLED15" && (! preg(pattern:"^(4)$", string:service_pack))) audit(AUDIT_OS_NOT, "SLED15 SP4", os_ver + " SP" + service_pack);
if (os_ver == "SLED_SAP15" && (! preg(pattern:"^(4)$", string:service_pack))) audit(AUDIT_OS_NOT, "SLED_SAP15 SP4", os_ver + " SP" + service_pack);
if (os_ver == "SLES15" && (! preg(pattern:"^(4)$", string:service_pack))) audit(AUDIT_OS_NOT, "SLES15 SP4", os_ver + " SP" + service_pack);
if (os_ver == "SLES_SAP15" && (! preg(pattern:"^(4)$", string:service_pack))) audit(AUDIT_OS_NOT, "SLES_SAP15 SP4", os_ver + " SP" + service_pack);
var pkgs = [
{'reference':'libopenssl-3-devel-3.0.1-150400.4.7.1', 'sp':'4', 'release':'SLED_SAP15', 'rpm_spec_vers_cmp':TRUE, 'exists_check':['SLES_SAP-release-15.4']},
{'reference':'libopenssl-3-devel-3.0.1-150400.4.7.1', 'sp':'4', 'release':'SLES_SAP15', 'rpm_spec_vers_cmp':TRUE, 'exists_check':['SLES_SAP-release-15.4']},
{'reference':'libopenssl3-3.0.1-150400.4.7.1', 'sp':'4', 'release':'SLED_SAP15', 'rpm_spec_vers_cmp':TRUE, 'exists_check':['SLES_SAP-release-15.4']},
{'reference':'libopenssl3-3.0.1-150400.4.7.1', 'sp':'4', 'release':'SLES_SAP15', 'rpm_spec_vers_cmp':TRUE, 'exists_check':['SLES_SAP-release-15.4']},
{'reference':'openssl-3-3.0.1-150400.4.7.1', 'sp':'4', 'release':'SLED_SAP15', 'rpm_spec_vers_cmp':TRUE, 'exists_check':['SLES_SAP-release-15.4']},
{'reference':'openssl-3-3.0.1-150400.4.7.1', 'sp':'4', 'release':'SLES_SAP15', 'rpm_spec_vers_cmp':TRUE, 'exists_check':['SLES_SAP-release-15.4']},
{'reference':'libopenssl-3-devel-3.0.1-150400.4.7.1', 'sp':'4', 'release':'SLED15', 'rpm_spec_vers_cmp':TRUE, 'exists_check':['SLE_HPC-release-15.4', 'sle-module-basesystem-release-15.4', 'sled-release-15.4', 'sles-release-15.4']},
{'reference':'libopenssl-3-devel-3.0.1-150400.4.7.1', 'sp':'4', 'release':'SLES15', 'rpm_spec_vers_cmp':TRUE, 'exists_check':['SLE_HPC-release-15.4', 'sle-module-basesystem-release-15.4', 'sled-release-15.4', 'sles-release-15.4']},
{'reference':'libopenssl3-3.0.1-150400.4.7.1', 'sp':'4', 'release':'SLED15', 'rpm_spec_vers_cmp':TRUE, 'exists_check':['SLE_HPC-release-15.4', 'sle-module-basesystem-release-15.4', 'sled-release-15.4', 'sles-release-15.4']},
{'reference':'libopenssl3-3.0.1-150400.4.7.1', 'sp':'4', 'release':'SLES15', 'rpm_spec_vers_cmp':TRUE, 'exists_check':['SLE_HPC-release-15.4', 'sle-module-basesystem-release-15.4', 'sled-release-15.4', 'sles-release-15.4']},
{'reference':'openssl-3-3.0.1-150400.4.7.1', 'sp':'4', 'release':'SLED15', 'rpm_spec_vers_cmp':TRUE, 'exists_check':['SLE_HPC-release-15.4', 'sle-module-basesystem-release-15.4', 'sled-release-15.4', 'sles-release-15.4']},
{'reference':'openssl-3-3.0.1-150400.4.7.1', 'sp':'4', 'release':'SLES15', 'rpm_spec_vers_cmp':TRUE, 'exists_check':['SLE_HPC-release-15.4', 'sle-module-basesystem-release-15.4', 'sled-release-15.4', 'sles-release-15.4']}
];
var ltss_caveat_required = FALSE;
var flag = 0;
foreach var package_array ( pkgs ) {
var reference = NULL;
var _release = NULL;
var sp = NULL;
var _cpu = NULL;
var exists_check = NULL;
var rpm_spec_vers_cmp = NULL;
if (!empty_or_null(package_array['reference'])) reference = package_array['reference'];
if (!empty_or_null(package_array['release'])) _release = package_array['release'];
if (!empty_or_null(package_array['sp'])) sp = package_array['sp'];
if (!empty_or_null(package_array['cpu'])) _cpu = package_array['cpu'];
if (!empty_or_null(package_array['exists_check'])) exists_check = package_array['exists_check'];
if (!empty_or_null(package_array['rpm_spec_vers_cmp'])) rpm_spec_vers_cmp = package_array['rpm_spec_vers_cmp'];
if (reference && _release) {
if (exists_check) {
var check_flag = 0;
foreach var check (exists_check) {
if (!rpm_exists(release:_release, rpm:check)) continue;
check_flag++;
}
if (!check_flag) continue;
}
if (rpm_check(release:_release, sp:sp, cpu:_cpu, reference:reference, rpm_spec_vers_cmp:rpm_spec_vers_cmp)) flag++;
}
}
if (flag)
{
security_report_v4(
port : 0,
severity : SECURITY_HOLE,
extra : rpm_report_get()
);
exit(0);
}
else
{
var tested = pkg_tests_get();
if (tested) audit(AUDIT_PACKAGE_NOT_AFFECTED, tested);
else audit(AUDIT_PACKAGE_NOT_INSTALLED, 'libopenssl-3-devel / libopenssl3 / openssl-3');
}
cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2022-1292
cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2022-1343
cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2022-1434
cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2022-1473
cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2022-2068
cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2022-2097
bugzilla.suse.com/1185637
bugzilla.suse.com/1199166
bugzilla.suse.com/1199167
bugzilla.suse.com/1199168
bugzilla.suse.com/1199169
bugzilla.suse.com/1200550
bugzilla.suse.com/1201099
lists.suse.com/pipermail/sle-updates/2022-July/023781.html
www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-1292
www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-1343
www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-1434
www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-1473
www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-2068
www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-2097