OpenSSL 1.1.1 < 1.1.1zj Multiple Vulnerabilities
| Reporter | Title | Published | Views | Family All 136 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpenSSL -- Multiple vulnerabilities | 29 Sep 202600:00 | – | freebsd | |
| CVE-2026-35189 | 29 Sep 202615:32 | – | alpinelinux | |
| CVE-2026-54872 | 29 Sep 202615:32 | – | alpinelinux | |
| CVE-2026-75806 | 29 Sep 202615:32 | – | alpinelinux | |
| CVE-2026-77696 | 29 Sep 202615:32 | – | alpinelinux | |
| CVE-2026-84782 | 29 Sep 202615:32 | – | alpinelinux | |
| CVE-2026-35189 | 29 Sep 202619:46 | – | circl | |
| CVE-2026-54872 | 29 Sep 202619:46 | – | circl | |
| CVE-2026-75806 | 30 Sep 202612:50 | – | circl | |
| CVE-2026-77696 | 30 Sep 202612:50 | – | circl |
10
10
#%NASL_MIN_LEVEL 80900
##
# (C) Tenable, Inc.
##
include('compat.inc');
if (description)
{
script_id(352192);
script_version("1.1");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_modification_date", value:"2026/09/30");
script_cve_id(
"CVE-2026-35189",
"CVE-2026-54872",
"CVE-2026-75806",
"CVE-2026-77696",
"CVE-2026-84782"
);
script_name(english:"OpenSSL 1.1.1 < 1.1.1zj Multiple Vulnerabilities");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"synopsis", value:
"The remote service is affected by multiple vulnerabilities.");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"description", value:
"The version of OpenSSL installed on the remote host is prior to 1.1.1zj. It is, therefore, affected by multiple
vulnerabilities as referenced in the 1.1.1zj advisory.
- Issue summary: The DTLS retransmission logic does not correctly handle a handshake message write that is
suspended part-way through. The retransmitted message can be read past the message buffer and the
retransmission overwrites the internal state the suspended write needs to resume correctly. Impact
summary: The retransmitted message can disclose a heap memory to the peer as plaintext handshake data or
cause a crash and a Denial of Service when the read reaches an unmapped memory region. CWE: CWE-125: Out-
of-bounds Read Description: DTLS handshake messages can be written out in multiple fragments, and a write
can suspend mid-message (returning WANT_WRITE) if the underlying transport temporarily cannot accept more
data. While such a write is suspended, the DTLS retransmission timer may independently fire and ask the
retransmission logic to resend an earlier, already-acknowledged-as-sent message from its retransmit queue.
The retransmission logic reused the same internal buffer and position tracking as the message that was
still being written, without resetting the position back to the start of the message being retransmitted.
As a result the retransmission was read starting from wherever the suspended write had left off, producing
a mislabelled message whose body was leftover bytes from the other, larger message still in flight -
content that was never meant to be sent at that point, and which could run past the end of the allocated
buffer. Separately, even when the retransmission is positioned correctly, allowing it to run to completion
while another write is suspended overwrites the same shared bookkeeping that the suspended write depends
on to resume. When the application later resumes the suspended write (via a subsequent SSL_read(),
SSL_write(), SSL_accept(), or SSL_connect() call), it finds that bookkeeping in a state inconsistent with
the message and aborts the process in a debugging build. The fix resets the retransmission's read position
to the start of the message before resending, and skips retransmission entirely whenever a handshake write
is still suspended, deferring to the next call that resumes it instead. FIPS impact: no The affected code
is outside the FIPS module boundary. (CVE-2026-84782)
- Issue summary: A certificate with many nameRelativeToCRLIssuer CRL distribution points causes
disproportionate heap growth when OpenSSL caches X.509 extensions. Impact summary: Receiving a crafted
certificate from a malicious peer can lead to significant memory pressure and possible Denial of Service
in clients or in servers that solicit client certificates. CWE: CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without
Limits or Throttling Description: A certificate or a set of certificates that fits under the limit for
size of certificates accepted from the peer (~100 KiB) can result in allocation of several hundred MiB of
resident memory on the receiving side during a normal TLS handshake. This may be enough to crash the
client or server, if multiple concurrent connections lead to similarly large memory allocations. The fix
postpones processing of the CRL distribution points extensions in certificates to the time when the
processed value is required for CRL processing. This avoids keeping large memory allocations for a long
time when such certificates are received. FIPS impact: no The affected code is outside the FIPS module
boundary. (CVE-2026-35189)
- Issue summary: The generic elliptic-curve scalar multiplication used for ECDSA and SM2 signature
operations with curves that do not have a dedicated implementation leaks information about the secret
nonce through timing. Impact summary: An attacker able to measure signing times may learn information
about the per-signature secret nonce, which over many signatures can, via a lattice / Hidden Number
Problem attack, lead to recovery of the private key. CWE: CWE-208: Observable Timing Discrepancy
Description: The generic elliptic-curve scalar multiplication used for curves that do not have a dedicated
constant-time implementation pads the secret scalar with non-constant-time BIGNUM operations, so the time
taken depends on the value of the secret scalar derived from the ECDSA and SM2 nonce. The leak is very
small; observing it requires a large number of measurements. The effect is largest for curves whose group
order lies on a machine-word boundary, such as brainpoolP384r1. Applications using ECDSA signing over the
Brainpool and other generic prime curves, and SM2 signing on platforms that use the generic
implementation, are vulnerable to this issue. The NIST curves P-256, P-384 and P-521 use dedicated
constant-time implementations and are not affected. FIPS Impact: no The FIPS modules are not affected: the
approved NIST curves used in the FIPS provider have dedicated constant-time implementations and do not use
the affected code path. (CVE-2026-54872)
- Issue summary: An established DTLS 1.2 association using an AEAD cipher suite can be terminated by a
single unauthenticated datagram whose encrypted fragment is shorter than the mandatory explicit IV and
authentication tag overhead. Impact summary: An attacker who can send a datagram that is routed to an
existing DTLS 1.2 association can tear that association down without knowing any key material. This is a
Denial of Service limited to the targeted association. There is no memory safety or confidentiality
impact. CWE: CWE-1284: Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input Description: In TLS 1.2 and DTLS
1.2 every record protected by an AEAD cipher suite carries an explicit IV followed by the ciphertext and
an authentication tag. When decrypting such a record the record layer passed the record length to the
cipher implementation before checking that the record was long enough to contain the explicit IV and the
tag. For a record shorter than that overhead the cipher implementation rejected the impossible length, and
the record layer treated this as an internal failure and raised a fatal internal_error alert instead of
treating the record as one that failed authentication. In TLS 1.2 the same record causes a fatal
internal_error alert instead of the expected bad_record_mac alert. Since any undecryptable record already
terminates a TLS connection, this is a protocol conformance issue rather than a security issue in TLS. The
fix validates the record length against the explicit IV and tag length before any AEAD processing, so that
TLS reports bad_record_mac and DTLS silently discards the record. FIPS impact: no The affected code is
outside the FIPS module boundary. (CVE-2026-75806)
- Issue summary: SM2 signature generation uses non-constant-time arithmetic on secret values, forming a
timing side-channel. Impact summary: An attacker able to measure SM2 signing times may learn information
about the per-signature secret nonce, which over many signatures can, via a lattice / Hidden Number
Problem attack, lead to recovery of the private key. CWE: CWE-208: Observable Timing Discrepancy
Description: SM2 signature generation computes the signature value using variable-time BIGNUM operations
on the secret nonce and the private key, so the time taken to produce an SM2 signature depends on these
secret values, forming a timing side-channel. Applications performing SM2 signature generation are
affected on all platforms. FIPS Impact: no SM2 is not a FIPS algorithm. (CVE-2026-77696)
Note that Nessus has not tested for these issues but has instead relied only on the application's self-reported version
number.");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"https://openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260929.txt");
# https://openssl-library.org/policies/general/security-policy/index.html
script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"http://www.nessus.org/u?eac4598c");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-35189");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54872");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-75806");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-77696");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"see_also", value:"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-84782");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"solution", value:
"Upgrade to OpenSSL version 1.1.1zj or later.");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"agent", value:"all");
script_set_cvss_base_vector("CVSS2#AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:C");
script_set_cvss_temporal_vector("CVSS2#E:U/RL:OF/RC:C");
script_set_cvss3_base_vector("CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:H");
script_set_cvss3_temporal_vector("CVSS:3.0/E:U/RL:O/RC:C");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"cvss_score_source", value:"CVE-2026-84782");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploitability_ease", value:"No known exploits are available");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"exploit_available", value:"false");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"vuln_publication_date", value:"2026/09/29");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"patch_publication_date", value:"2026/09/29");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_publication_date", value:"2026/09/30");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"plugin_type", value:"combined");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"cpe", value:"cpe:/a:openssl:openssl");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"generated_plugin", value:"current");
script_set_attribute(attribute:"thorough_tests", value:"true");
script_end_attributes();
script_category(ACT_GATHER_INFO);
script_family(english:"Web Servers");
script_copyright(english:"This script is Copyright (C) 2026 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.");
script_dependencies("openssl_version.nasl", "openssl_nix_installed.nbin", "openssl_win_installed.nbin");
script_require_keys("installed_sw/OpenSSL");
exit(0);
}
include('vcf.inc');
include('vcf_extras_openssl.inc');
var app_info = vcf::combined_get_app_info(app:'OpenSSL');
vcf::check_all_backporting(app_info:app_info);
var constraints = [
{ 'min_version' : '1.1.1', 'fixed_version' : '1.1.1zj' }
];
vcf::openssl::check_version_and_report(
app_info:app_info,
constraints:constraints,
severity:SECURITY_HOLE
);
Data
Build on a solid foundation with Vulners data
We provide the essential building blocks for cybersecurity solutions with comprehensive, structured, and constantly updated vulnerability and exploits data
Api
Power your application with Vulners API
The Vulners REST API offers reliable, high-performance access to vulnerability intelligence, with 99.9% SLA uptime and CDN-backed data delivery for seamless global access
App
Assess and manage vulnerabilities with Vulners tools
Built on top of Vulners' database and SDK, end-user solutions give security professionals and developers lightweight and powerful tools for vulnerability remediation
30 Sep 2026 00:00Current
6Medium risk
Vulners AI Score6
CVSS 3.18.2
EPSS0.0039
SSVC