Lucene search

K
githubGitHub Advisory DatabaseGHSA-WP72-7HJ9-5265
HistoryMar 24, 2023 - 10:01 p.m.

Remote file existence check vulnerability in `mlflow server` and `mlflow ui` CLIs

2023-03-2422:01:15
CWE-36
GitHub Advisory Database
github.com
15
mlflow
vulnerability
remote file existence
mlflow server
mlflow ui
exploit
cloud vpc
ip allowlist
authentication
authorization middleware
integration
databricks
azure machine learning
patch
pypi
workaround
mlflow model registry
mlflow tracking
access restriction
nvd.

CVSS3

3.3

Attack Vector

LOCAL

Attack Complexity

LOW

Privileges Required

LOW

User Interaction

NONE

Scope

UNCHANGED

Confidentiality Impact

LOW

Integrity Impact

NONE

Availability Impact

NONE

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

EPSS

0

Percentile

9.0%

Impact

Users of the MLflow Open Source Project who are hosting the MLflow Model Registry using the mlflow server or mlflow ui commands using an MLflow version older than MLflow 2.2.1 may be vulnerable to a remote file existence check exploit if they are not limiting who can query their server (for example, by using a cloud VPC, an IP allowlist for inbound requests, or authentication / authorization middleware).

This issue only affects users and integrations that run the mlflow server and mlflow ui commands. Integrations that do not make use of mlflow server or mlflow ui are unaffected; for example, the Databricks Managed MLflow product and MLflow on Azure Machine Learning do not make use of these commands and are not impacted by these vulnerabilities in any way.

The vulnerability detailed in https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-1176 enables an actor to check the existence of arbitrary files unrelated to MLflow from the host server, including any files stored in remote locations to which the host server has access.

Patches

This vulnerability has been patched in MLflow 2.2.1, which was released to PyPI on March 2nd, 2023. If you are using mlflow server or mlflow ui with the MLflow Model Registry, we recommend upgrading to MLflow 2.2.1 as soon as possible.

Workarounds

If you are using the MLflow open source mlflow server or mlflow ui commands, we strongly recommend limiting who can access your MLflow Model Registry and MLflow Tracking servers using a cloud VPC, an IP allowlist for inbound requests, authentication / authorization middleware, or another access restriction mechanism of your choosing.

If you are using the MLflow open source mlflow server or mlflow ui commands, we also strongly recommend limiting the remote files to which your MLflow Model Registry and MLflow Tracking servers have access. For example, if your MLflow Model Registry or MLflow Tracking server uses cloud-hosted blob storage for MLflow artifacts, make sure to restrict the scope of your server’s cloud credentials such that it can only access files and directories related to MLflow.

References

More information about the vulnerability is available at https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-1176.

Affected configurations

Vulners
Node
mlflowmlflowRange2.2.0
VendorProductVersionCPE
mlflowmlflow*cpe:2.3:a:mlflow:mlflow:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

CVSS3

3.3

Attack Vector

LOCAL

Attack Complexity

LOW

Privileges Required

LOW

User Interaction

NONE

Scope

UNCHANGED

Confidentiality Impact

LOW

Integrity Impact

NONE

Availability Impact

NONE

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

EPSS

0

Percentile

9.0%

Related for GHSA-WP72-7HJ9-5265