Note: For information about signing up to receive security notice updates from F5, refer to K9970: Subscribing to email notifications regarding F5 products.Note: Versions that are not listed in this article have not been evaluated for vulnerability to this security advisory. For information about the F5 security policy regarding evaluating older and unsupported versions of F5 products, refer to K4602: Overview of the F5 security vulnerability response policy.F5 products and versions that have been evaluated for this Security Advisory
Product | Affected | Not Affected |
---|---|---|
BIG-IP LTM | None | 9.x |
10.x | ||
11.x | ||
BIG-IP GTM | None | 9.x |
10.x | ||
11.x | ||
BIG-IP ASM | None | 9.x |
10.x | ||
11.x | ||
BIG-IP Link Controller | None | 9.x |
10.x | ||
11.x | ||
BIG-IP WebAccelerator | None | 9.x |
10.x | ||
11.x | ||
BIG-IP PSM | None | 9.x |
10.x | ||
11.x | ||
BIG-IP WAN Optimization | None | 10.x |
11.x | ||
BIG-IP APM | None | 10.x |
11.x | ||
BIG-IP Edge Gateway | None | 10.x |
11.x | ||
BIG-IP Analytics | None | 11.x |
BIG-IP AFM | None | 11.x |
BIG-IP PEM | None | 11.x |
FirePass | None | 5.x |
6.x | ||
7.x | ||
Enterprise Manager | None | 1.x |
2.x | ||
3.x | ||
BIG-IQ Centralized Management | None | 5.x |
TCP, when using a large Window Size, makes it easier for remote attackers to guess sequence numbers and cause a denial of service (connection loss) to persistent TCP connections by repeatedly injecting a TCP RST packet, especially in protocols that use long-lived connections, such as BGP. | ||
This vulnerability is found in the principle design of TCP/IP itself and cannot be completely corrected without changing to an alternate protocol. The central issue in this vulnerability is that for long-lived connections, as measured in hours or days, an outside attacker could send a flurry of RST packets and cut the connection and adversely affect clients, servers, or peers. |