Lucene search
K

Microsoft Windows Defender - 'mpengine.dll' Memory Corruption

🗓️ 05 Apr 2018 00:00:00Reported by Google Security ResearchType 
exploitdb
 exploitdb
🔗 www.exploit-db.com👁 100 Views

Windows Defender 'mpengine.dll' Memory Corruption due to RAR Archive Processin

Related
Code
Windows Defender inspects a variety of different archive formats, among others RAR.

Inspection of mpengine.dll revealed that the code responsible for processing RAR archives appears to be a forked and modified version of the original unrar code; given that it still processes the VMSF_UPCASE filter (which was removed in unrar 5.0), it seems that the code is derived from a version of unrar older or equal than 4.2.4.

Interestingly, the issue discovered in CVE-2012-6706 (Sophos VMSF_DELTA, and in 2017 unrar) and other signedness issues in the RarVM::ExecuteStandardFilter function were fixed long ago (apparently without a report to upstream, most likely by simply turning the relevant variables from "signed" to "unsigned").

It appears that this blanket conversion from signed to unsigned ended up introducing a new vulnerability, though:

From unrar 4.2.4 rarvm.cpp:

    case VMSF_RGB:
      {
        int DataSize=R[4],Width=R[0]-3,PosR=R[1];
        byte *SrcData=Mem,*DestData=SrcData+DataSize;
        const int Channels=3;
        SET_VALUE(false,&Mem[VM_GLOBALMEMADDR+0x20],DataSize);
        if ((uint)DataSize>=VM_GLOBALMEMADDR/2 || PosR<0)
          break;
        for (int CurChannel=0;CurChannel<Channels;CurChannel++)

The code clearly ensures that PosR is positive from here on.

This check is no longer present in the binary version of the same code in mpengine, most likely since most signed comparisons in this function have been turned unsigned. 

This causes a vulnerability later in the same function (RarVM::ExecuteStandardFilter)

Decompile of the mpengine code snippet:

if ( PosR + 2 < DataSize ) {
  v50 = (_BYTE *)(v39 + PosR);
  do {
    v51 = v50[1];
    *v50 += v51;
    v50 += 3;
    *(v50 - 1) += v51;
  } while ( (unsigned int)&v50[2 - v39] < DataSize );

Original unrar code:
  for (int I=PosR,Border=DataSize-2;I<Border;I+=3)
  {
    byte G=DestData[I+1];
    DestData[I]+=G;
    DestData[I+2]+=G;
  }

An attacker that can set PosR to be -2, and DataSize to 1, will bypass the (PosR + 2 < DataSize) check. v50 above will then point to one byte *before* the allocated buffer (v50 respective DestData points into a buffer at index DataSize -- so adding -2 to index 1 will index to -1. The byte from the start of this array will be added into the byte preceding the array.

A minimal sample RAR file that exhibits these traits & causes mpengine to corrupt memory and crash is attached.


Proof of Concept:
https://gitlab.com/exploit-database/exploitdb-bin-sploits/-/raw/main/bin-sploits/44402.zip

Data

Build on a solid foundation with Vulners data

We provide the essential building blocks for cybersecurity solutions with comprehensive, structured, and constantly updated vulnerability and exploits data

Api

Power your application with Vulners API

The Vulners REST API offers reliable, high-performance access to vulnerability intelligence, with 99.9% SLA uptime and CDN-backed data delivery for seamless global access

App

Assess and manage vulnerabilities with Vulners tools

Built on top of Vulners' database and SDK, end-user solutions give security professionals and developers lightweight and powerful tools for vulnerability remediation