Source: http://bugzilla.maptools.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2693
On 4.0.7:
# tiffsplit $FILE
==2007== Invalid read of size 4
==2007== at 0x40CD1A: _TIFFVGetField (tif_dir.c:1072)
==2007== by 0x41B2C5: TIFFVGetField (tif_dir.c:1198)
==2007== by 0x41B2C5: TIFFGetField (tif_dir.c:1182)
==2007== by 0x404CCF: tiffcp (tiffsplit.c:220)
==2007== by 0x404CCF: main (tiffsplit.c:89)
==2007== Address 0x0 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
------- Comment #1 From zhangtan 2017-05-15 01:20:26 -------
The place of Out of bound read:
ret_val = 0;
for (i = 0; i < td->td_customValueCount; i++) {
TIFFTagValue *tv = td->td_customValues + i;
if (tv->info->field_tag != tag)
continue;
------- Comment #2 From zhangtan 2017-05-15 01:29:10 -------
The place of Out of bound read:
The 1072 line of tif_dir.c
1068 ret_val = 0;
1069 for (i = 0; i < td->td_customValueCount; i++) {
1070 TIFFTagValue *tv = td->td_customValues + i;
1071
1072 if (tv->info->field_tag != tag)
1073 continue;
As tv increased in 1070, Out of bound read happened in 1072 when the pointer tv
was referenced.
------- Comment #3 From zhangtan 2017-05-15 01:46:33 -------
PoC:
Detailed information of the bug can be reproduced using the valgrind tool:
# valgrind tiffsplit $File(the testcase in the attachment)
Error Message:
==23520== Invalid read of size 4
==23520== at 0x40CD1A: _TIFFVGetField (tif_dir.c:1072)
==23520== by 0x41B2C5: TIFFVGetField (tif_dir.c:1198)
==23520== by 0x41B2C5: TIFFGetField (tif_dir.c:1182)
==23520== by 0x404CCF: tiffcp (tiffsplit.c:220)
==23520== by 0x404CCF: main (tiffsplit.c:89)
==23520== Address 0x0 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
==23520==
==23520==
==23520== Process terminating with default action of signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
==23520== Access not within mapped region at address 0x0
==23520== at 0x40CD1A: _TIFFVGetField (tif_dir.c:1072)
==23520== by 0x41B2C5: TIFFVGetField (tif_dir.c:1198)
==23520== by 0x41B2C5: TIFFGetField (tif_dir.c:1182)
==23520== by 0x404CCF: tiffcp (tiffsplit.c:220)
==23520== by 0x404CCF: main (tiffsplit.c:89)
==23520== If you believe this happened as a result of a stack
==23520== overflow in your program's main thread (unlikely but
==23520== possible), you can try to increase the size of the
==23520== main thread stack using the --main-stacksize= flag.
==23520== The main thread stack size used in this run was 8388608.
==23520==
==23520== HEAP SUMMARY:
==23520== in use at exit: 17,821 bytes in 42 blocks
==23520== total heap usage: 96 allocs, 54 frees, 59,223 bytes allocated
==23520==
==23520== LEAK SUMMARY:
==23520== definitely lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==23520== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==23520== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==23520== still reachable: 17,821 bytes in 42 blocks
==23520== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==23520== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory
==23520==
==23520== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==23520== ERROR SUMMARY: 1 errors from 1 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
Segmentation fault
Proof of Concept:
https://gitlab.com/exploit-database/exploitdb-bin-sploits/-/raw/main/bin-sploits/42301.zipData
Build on a solid foundation with Vulners data
We provide the essential building blocks for cybersecurity solutions with comprehensive, structured, and constantly updated vulnerability and exploits data
Api
Power your application with Vulners API
The Vulners REST API offers reliable, high-performance access to vulnerability intelligence, with 99.9% SLA uptime and CDN-backed data delivery for seamless global access
App
Assess and manage vulnerabilities with Vulners tools
Built on top of Vulners' database and SDK, end-user solutions give security professionals and developers lightweight and powerful tools for vulnerability remediation