Lucene search

K
cve[email protected]CVE-2020-15105
HistoryJul 10, 2020 - 9:15 p.m.

CVE-2020-15105

2020-07-1021:15:10
CWE-312
web.nvd.nist.gov
66
cve-2020-15105
django
two-factor authentication
password storage
security risk
session storage
clear text
base64-encoded
vulnerability
data breach
security tradeoffs
upgrade

3.6 Low

CVSS2

Attack Vector

NETWORK

Attack Complexity

HIGH

Authentication

SINGLE

Confidentiality Impact

PARTIAL

Integrity Impact

PARTIAL

Availability Impact

NONE

AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:N

5.4 Medium

CVSS3

Attack Vector

NETWORK

Attack Complexity

HIGH

Privileges Required

LOW

User Interaction

REQUIRED

Scope

UNCHANGED

Confidentiality Impact

HIGH

Integrity Impact

LOW

Availability Impact

NONE

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

5.8 Medium

AI Score

Confidence

High

0.001 Low

EPSS

Percentile

41.5%

Django Two-Factor Authentication before 1.12, stores the user’s password in clear text in the user session (base64-encoded). The password is stored in the session when the user submits their username and password, and is removed once they complete authentication by entering a two-factor authentication code. This means that the password is stored in clear text in the session for an arbitrary amount of time, and potentially forever if the user begins the login process by entering their username and password and then leaves before entering their two-factor authentication code. The severity of this issue depends on which type of session storage you have configured: in the worst case, if you’re using Django’s default database session storage, then users’ passwords are stored in clear text in your database. In the best case, if you’re using Django’s signed cookie session, then users’ passwords are only stored in clear text within their browser’s cookie store. In the common case of using Django’s cache session store, the users’ passwords are stored in clear text in whatever cache storage you have configured (typically Memcached or Redis). This has been fixed in 1.12. After upgrading, users should be sure to delete any clear text passwords that have been stored. For example, if you’re using the database session backend, you’ll likely want to delete any session record from the database and purge that data from any database backups or replicas. In addition, affected organizations who have suffered a database breach while using an affected version should inform their users that their clear text passwords have been compromised. All organizations should encourage users whose passwords were insecurely stored to change these passwords on any sites where they were used. As a workaround, wwitching Django’s session storage to use signed cookies instead of the database or cache lessens the impact of this issue, but should not be done without a thorough understanding of the security tradeoffs of using signed cookies rather than a server-side session storage. There is no way to fully mitigate the issue without upgrading.

Affected configurations

Vulners
NVD
Node
boukedjango_two_factor_authRange<1.12

CNA Affected

[
  {
    "product": "django-two-factor-auth",
    "vendor": "Bouke",
    "versions": [
      {
        "status": "affected",
        "version": "< 1.12"
      }
    ]
  }
]

3.6 Low

CVSS2

Attack Vector

NETWORK

Attack Complexity

HIGH

Authentication

SINGLE

Confidentiality Impact

PARTIAL

Integrity Impact

PARTIAL

Availability Impact

NONE

AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:N

5.4 Medium

CVSS3

Attack Vector

NETWORK

Attack Complexity

HIGH

Privileges Required

LOW

User Interaction

REQUIRED

Scope

UNCHANGED

Confidentiality Impact

HIGH

Integrity Impact

LOW

Availability Impact

NONE

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

5.8 Medium

AI Score

Confidence

High

0.001 Low

EPSS

Percentile

41.5%

Related for CVE-2020-15105