ID CVE-2020-1206 Type cve Reporter secure@microsoft.com Modified 2020-06-12T18:51:00
Description
An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the way that the Microsoft Server Message Block 3.1.1 (SMBv3) protocol handles certain requests, aka 'Windows SMBv3 Client/Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability'.
{"attackerkb": [{"lastseen": "2021-05-06T15:19:42", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvelist": ["CVE-2020-0796", "CVE-2020-1206"], "description": "An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the way that the Microsoft Server Message Block 3.1.1 (SMBv3) protocol handles certain requests, aka \u2018Windows SMBv3 Client/Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability\u2019.\n\n \n**Recent assessments:** \n \n**busterb** at June 09, 2020 11:49pm UTC reported:\n\nEdit: After writing this **@adfoster-r7** pointed out that Zecops has a writeup on exactly how to chain this with SMBGhost. How apropos! <https://blog.zecops.com/vulnerabilities/smbleedingghost-writeup-chaining-smbleed-cve-2020-1206-with-smbghost/>\n\nNote that if you were already patched against CVE-2020-0796, the current PoCs aren\u2019t going to be impactful to you, so the urgency is lower than if you\u2019re a couple of months out of date. If you\u2019re patching already, no need to panic.\n\nWhenever we see SMB memory corruption leaks, the cry is always \u2018oh, if only we had an information leak, we could make this so much more reliable\u2019. Well, assuming someone figures out the details, this could be the information leak folks are looking for to make SMBGhost and other vulnerabilities more reliable to exploit. Not a big deal by itself, but I imagine folks are already trying to figure out how to use this to an advantage. It might not take long given the existence of public SMBGhost PoCs already.\n\nAssessed Attacker Value: 4 \nAssessed Attacker Value: 3\n", "modified": "2020-07-24T00:00:00", "id": "AKB:ED05CA72-27C8-4C22-BFF9-2AE3451C549C", "href": "https://attackerkb.com/topics/svIblFzC4r/cve-2020-1206-windows-smbv3-client-server-information-disclosure-vulnerability", "published": "2020-06-09T00:00:00", "type": "attackerkb", "title": "CVE-2020-1206 Windows SMBv3 Client/Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability", "cvss": {"score": 7.5, "vector": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P"}}], "mscve": [{"lastseen": "2021-03-18T19:15:36", "bulletinFamily": "microsoft", "cvelist": ["CVE-2020-1206"], "description": "An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the way that the Microsoft Server Message Block 3.1.1 (SMBv3) protocol handles certain requests. An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could obtain information to further compromise the user\u2019s system.\n\nTo exploit the vulnerability against a server, an unauthenticated attacker could send a specially crafted packet to a targeted SMBv3 server. To exploit the vulnerability against a client, an unauthenticated attacker would need to configure a malicious SMBv3 server and convince a user to connect to it.\n\nThe security update addresses the vulnerability by correcting how the SMBv3 protocol handles these specially crafted requests.\n", "modified": "2020-06-09T07:00:00", "id": "MS:CVE-2020-1206", "href": "https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/en-US/vulnerability/CVE-2020-1206", "published": "2020-06-09T07:00:00", "type": "mscve", "title": "Windows SMBv3 Client/Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability", "cvss": {"score": 5.0, "vector": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N"}}], "malwarebytes": [{"lastseen": "2020-06-14T20:37:43", "bulletinFamily": "blog", "cvelist": ["CVE-2020-1206"], "description": "Car manufacturer Honda has been hit by a cyber attack, according to a [report](<https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-52982427>) published by the BBC, and later confirmed by the company in a [tweet](<https://twitter.com/HondaCustSvc/status/1270048801307234304>). Another similar attack, also [disclosed on Twitter](<https://twitter.com/OficialEdesur/status/1269713550114684935>), hit Edesur S.A., one of the companies belonging to Enel Argentina which operates in the business of energy distribution in the City of Buenos Aires.\n\nBased on samples posted online, these incidents may be tied to the EKANS/SNAKE ransomware family. In this blog post, we review what is known about this ransomware strain and what we have been able to analyze so far.\n\n### Targeted ransomware with a liking for ICS\n\nFirst public mentions of EKANS ransomware date back to January 2020, with security researcher Vitali Kremez [sharing](<https://twitter.com/VK_Intel/status/1214333066245812224?s=20>) information about a new targeted ransomware written in GOLANG.\n\nThe group appears to have a special interest for Industrial Control Systems (ICS), as detailed in this [blog post](<https://www.dragos.com/blog/industry-news/ekans-ransomware-and-ics-operations/>) by security firm Dragos.\n\n[](<https://blog.malwarebytes.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/ransom_note.png> \"\" )Figure 1: EKANS ransom note\n\nOn June 8, a researcher [shared](<https://twitter.com/milkr3am/status/1269932348860030979?s=20>) samples of ransomware that supposedly was aimed at Honda and ENEL INT. When we started looking at the code, we found several artefacts that corroborate this possibility.\n\n[](<https://blog.malwarebytes.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/1-dbg.png> \"\" )Figure 2: Mutex check\n\nWhen the malware executes, it will try to resolve to a hardcoded hostname (mds.honda.com). If, and only if it does, will the file encryption begin. The same logic, with a specific hostname, also applied to the ransomware allegedly tied to Enel.\n\n[](<https://blog.malwarebytes.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/2-dbg_.png> \"\" )Figure 3: Function responsible for performing DNS query\n\n**Target: Honda**\n\n * Resolving internal domain: mds.honda.com\n * Ransom e-mail: CarrolBidell@tutanota[.]com\n\n**Target: Enel**\n\n * Resolving internal domain: enelint.global\n * Ransom e-mail: CarrolBidell@tutanota[.]com\n\n### RDP as a possible attack vector\n\nBoth companies had some machines with Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) access publicly exposed (reference [here](<https://twitter.com/1ZRR4H/status/1270066266137559042?s=20>)). RDP attacks are one of the main entry points when it comes to targeted ransomware opertaions.\n\n * RDP Exposed: /AGL632956.jpn.mds.honda.com\n * RDP Exposed: /IT000001429258.enelint.global\n\nHowever, we cannot say conclusively that this is how threat actors may have gotten in. Ultimately, only a proper internal investigation will be able to determine exactly how the attackers were able to compromise the affected networks.\n\n### Detection\n\nWe tested the ransomware samples publicly available in our lab by creating a fake internal server that would respond to the DNS query made by the malware code with the same IP address it expected. We then ran the sample alleged to be tied to Honda against [Malwarebytes Nebula](<https://www.malwarebytes.com/business/cloud/>), our cloud-based endpoint protection for businesses.\n\n[](<https://blog.malwarebytes.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Nebula.png> \"\" )Figure 4: Malwarebytes Nebula dashboard showing detections\n\nWe detect this payload as 'Ransom.Ekans' when it attempts to execute. In order to test another of our protection layers, we also disabled (not recommended) the malware protection to let the behavior engine do its thing. Our anti-ransomware technology was able to quarantine the malicious file without the use of any signature.\n\nRansomware gangs have shown no mercy, even in this period of dealing with a pandemic. They continue to target big companies in order to extort large sums of money.\n\nRDP has been called out as some of the lowest hanging fruit preferred by attackers. However, we also recently learned about a [new SMB vulnerability](<https://blog.zecops.com/vulnerabilities/smbleedingghost-writeup-chaining-smbleed-cve-2020-1206-with-smbghost/>) allowing remote execution. It is important for defenders to properly map out all assets, patch them, and never allow them to be publicly exposed.\n\nWe will update this blog post if we come across new relevant information.\n\n### Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)\n\nHonda related sample:\n \n \n d4da69e424241c291c173c8b3756639c654432706e7def5025a649730868c4a1\n mds.honda.com\n\nEnel related sample:\n \n \n edef8b955468236c6323e9019abb10c324c27b4f5667bc3f85f3a097b2e5159a \n enelint.global\n\nThe post [Honda and Enel impacted by cyber attack suspected to be ransomware](<https://blog.malwarebytes.com/threat-analysis/2020/06/honda-and-enel-impacted-by-cyber-attack-suspected-to-be-ransomware/>) appeared first on [Malwarebytes Labs](<https://blog.malwarebytes.com>).", "modified": "2020-06-10T03:53:20", "published": "2020-06-10T03:53:20", "id": "MALWAREBYTES:BB5BB1F670997E83BD9555CB9995EB19", "href": "https://blog.malwarebytes.com/threat-analysis/2020/06/honda-and-enel-impacted-by-cyber-attack-suspected-to-be-ransomware/", "type": "malwarebytes", "title": "Honda and Enel impacted by cyber attack suspected to be ransomware", "cvss": {"score": 5.0, "vector": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N"}}], "thn": [{"lastseen": "2020-06-10T04:37:31", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvelist": ["CVE-2020-0796", "CVE-2020-1206"], "description": "[](<https://thehackernews.com/images/-31RfzSS3xQM/Xt-9Ggf-iMI/AAAAAAAAAbo/CAzBcgrMaUkcozaX_3-vN2Kqw-vCruNKwCLcBGAsYHQ/s728-e100/SMBleed-smb-vulnerability.jpg>)\n\nCybersecurity researchers today uncovered a new critical vulnerability affecting the Server Message Block (SMB) protocol that could allow attackers to leak kernel memory remotely, and when combined with a previously disclosed \"wormable\" bug, the flaw can be exploited to achieve remote code execution attacks. \n \nDubbed \"**SMBleed**\" ([CVE-2020-1206](<https://blog.zecops.com/vulnerabilities/smbleed-writeup-cve-2020-1206-chaining-smbleed-with-smbghost-for-a-rce/>)) by cybersecurity firm ZecOps, the flaw resides in SMB's decompression function \u2014 the same function as with [SMBGhost](<https://thehackernews.com/2020/03/smbv3-wormable-vulnerability.html>) or EternalDarkness bug ([CVE-2020-0796](<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-0796>)), which came to light three months ago, potentially opening vulnerable Windows systems to malware attacks that can propagate across networks. \n \nThe newly discovered vulnerability impacts Windows 10 versions 1903 and 1909, for which Microsoft today released security patches as part of its monthly [Patch Tuesday updates for June](<https://thehackernews.com/2020/06/windows-update-june.html>). \n\n\n \nThe development comes as the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) issued an advisory last week warning Windows 10 users to update their machines after exploit code for SMBGhost bug was published online last week. \n \nSMBGhost was deemed so serious that it received a maximum severity rating score of 10. \n \n\n\n[](<https://thehackernews.com/images/-HXrk2t3JHZo/Xt_WMvC_GjI/AAAAAAAA24g/XI7OAmusTswUO4fRatFn1viazIJt1A3YQCLcBGAsYHQ/s728-e100/SMBleed-smb-vulnerability.gif>)\n\n \n\"Although Microsoft disclosed and provided [updates for this vulnerability](<https://thehackernews.com/2020/03/patch-wormable-smb-vulnerability.html>) in March 2020, malicious cyber actors are targeting unpatched systems with the [new PoC](<https://github.com/chompie1337/SMBGhost_RCE_PoC/blob/master/README.md>), according to recent open-source reports,\" [CISA said](<https://www.us-cert.gov/ncas/current-activity/2020/06/05/unpatched-microsoft-systems-vulnerable-cve-2020-0796>). \n \nSMB, which runs over TCP port 445, is a network protocol that provides the basis for file sharing, network browsing, printing services, and interprocess communication over a network. \n \nAccording to ZecOps researchers, the flaw stems from the way the decompression function in question (\"[Srv2DecompressData](<https://blog.zecops.com/vulnerabilities/exploiting-smbghost-cve-2020-0796-for-a-local-privilege-escalation-writeup-and-poc/>)\") handles specially crafted message requests (e.g., [SMB2 WRITE](<https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/openspecs/windows_protocols/ms-smb2/e7046961-3318-4350-be2a-a8d69bb59ce8>)) sent to a targeted SMBv3 Server, allowing an attacker to read uninitialized kernel memory and make modifications to the compression function. \n\n\n \n\"The message structure contains fields such as the amount of bytes to write and flags, followed by a variable-length buffer,\" the researchers said. \"That's perfect for exploiting the bug since we can craft a message such that we specify the header, but the variable-length buffer contains uninitialized data.\" \n \n\"An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could obtain information to further compromise the user's system. To exploit the vulnerability against a server, an unauthenticated attacker could send a specially crafted packet to a targeted SMBv3 server,\" Microsoft said in its advisory. \n \n\"To exploit the vulnerability against a client, an unauthenticated attacker would need to configure a malicious SMBv3 server and convince a user to connect to it,\" Microsoft added. \n \n\n\n[](<https://thehackernews.com/images/-5r2cFQ5tcxU/Xt-7b9jI5lI/AAAAAAAAAbc/Lz27jkr0HmYimZJMXmSbvSt2mUc4GI6qQCLcBGAsYHQ/s728-e100/smbleed.jpg>)\n\n \nWorse, SMBleed can be chained with SMBGhost on unpatched Windows 10 systems to achieve remote code execution. The firm has also released a proof-of-concept [exploit code demonstrating](<https://github.com/ZecOps/CVE-2020-1206-POC>) the [flaws](<https://github.com/ZecOps/CVE-2020-0796-RCE-POC>). \n \n\n\n[](<https://thehackernews.com/images/-Jn6fEt5YpZ0/Xt_6MEANjOI/AAAAAAAA24s/zLjx-XBqNLYnjfayGiHXEKJko4si4eOqQCLcBGAsYHQ/s728-e100/windows-security.jpg>)\n\n \nTo mitigate the vulnerability, it's recommended that home and business users install the latest Windows updates as soon as possible. \n \nFor systems where the patch is not applicable, it's advised to block port 445 to prevent lateral movement and remote exploitation. \n \nMicrosoft's security guidance addressing SMBleed and SMBGhost in Windows 10 version 1909 and 1903 and Server Core for the same versions can be [found here](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1206>) and [here](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-0796>).\n", "modified": "2020-06-10T03:44:11", "published": "2020-06-09T20:30:00", "id": "THN:17F11846886656062FA1EA84D1C74534", "href": "https://thehackernews.com/2020/06/SMBleed-smb-vulnerability.html", "type": "thn", "title": "SMBleed: A New Critical Vulnerability Affects Windows SMB Protocol", "cvss": {"score": 7.5, "vector": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P"}}, {"lastseen": "2020-06-10T18:22:28", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvelist": ["CVE-2020-0796", "CVE-2020-1206", "CVE-2020-1213", "CVE-2020-1216", "CVE-2020-1229", "CVE-2020-1248", "CVE-2020-1260", "CVE-2020-1299", "CVE-2020-9633"], "description": "[](<https://thehackernews.com/images/-HLpQHeEvk6w/Xt_Q3_Z2PhI/AAAAAAAA24Y/ALzIuhTPzrEdlhe18apQb6AzpVQcp9qjQCLcBGAsYHQ/s728-e100/windows-update.jpg>)\n\nMicrosoft today released its June 2020 batch of software security updates that patches a total of 129 newly discovered vulnerabilities affecting various versions of Windows operating systems and related products. \n \nThis is the third Patch Tuesday update since the beginning of the global Covid-19 outbreak, putting some extra pressure on security teams struggling to keep up with patch management while proceeding with caution that should not break anything during this lockdown season. \n \nThe 129 bugs in the June 2020 bucket for sysadmins and billions of users include 11 critical vulnerabilities\u2014all leading to remote code execution attacks\u2014and 118 classified as important in severity, mostly leading to privilege escalation and spoofing attacks. \n\n\n \nAccording to the advisories Microsoft released today, hackers, fortunately, don't appear to be exploiting any of the zero-day vulnerabilities in the wild, and details for none of the flaws addressed this month was disclosed publicly before this publication. \n \nOne of the notable flaws is an information disclosure vulnerability ([CVE-2020-1206](<https://thehackernews.com/2020/06/SMBleed-smb-vulnerability.html>)) in Server Message Block 3.1.1 (SMBv3) protocol that, according to a team of researchers, can be exploited in combination with previously disclosed [SMBGhost (CVE-2020-0796)](<https://thehackernews.com/2020/03/smbv3-wormable-vulnerability.html>) flaw to archive remote code execution attacks. You can find more [details on this flaw](<https://thehackernews.com/2020/06/SMBleed-smb-vulnerability.html>) here. \n \nThree critical bugs (CVE-2020-1213, [CVE-2020-1216](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1216>), and CVE-2020-1260) affect the VBScript engine and exist in the way it handles objects in memory, allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. \n \nMicrosoft has listed these flaws as \"Exploitation more likely,\" explaining that it has seen attackers consistently exploiting similar flaws in the past, and can be carried out remotely via browser, application or Microsoft Office document that hosts the IE rendering engine. \n \nOne of the 11 critical issues exploits a vulnerability ([CVE-2020-1299](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1299>)) in the way Windows handles Shortcut files (.LNK), allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code on the targeted systems remotely. Like all previous LNK vulnerabilities, this type of attack could also lead to victims losing control over their computers or having their sensitive data stolen. \n \nThe GDI+ component that enables programs to use graphics and formatted text on a video display or printer in Windows has also been found vulnerable to a remote code execution flaw (CVE-2020-1248). \n\n\n \nAccording to Microsoft, GDI+ RCE vulnerability can be exploited in combination with a separate critical security feature bypass vulnerability ([CVE-2020-1229](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1229>)) affecting Microsoft Outlook software that could let attackers automatically load malicious images hosted on a remote server. \n \n\"In an email attack scenario, an attacker could exploit the vulnerability by sending the specially crafted image to the user. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could cause a system to load remote images. These images could disclose the IP address of the targeted system to the attacker,\" the advisory says. \n \nBesides these, the June 2020 update also includes a patch for a new critical remote code execution flaw ([CVE-2020-9633](<https://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsb20-30.html>)) affecting Adobe Flash Player for Windows systems. \n \nIt's recommended that all users apply the latest security patches as soon as possible to prevent malware or miscreants from exploiting them to gain remote control over vulnerable computers. \n \nFor installing the latest security updates, Windows users can head to Start > Settings > Update & Security > Windows Update, or by selecting Check for Windows updates. \n\n\nFound this article interesting? Follow THN on [Facebook](<https://www.facebook.com/thehackernews>), [Twitter _\uf099_](<https://twitter.com/thehackersnews>) and [LinkedIn](<https://www.linkedin.com/company/thehackernews/>) to read more exclusive content we post.\n", "modified": "2020-06-10T17:48:33", "published": "2020-06-09T18:14:00", "id": "THN:882595A940E5AB15E8B9C472154ACA45", "href": "https://thehackernews.com/2020/06/windows-update-june.html", "type": "thn", "title": "Microsoft Releases June 2020 Security Patches For 129 Vulnerabilities", "cvss": {"score": 7.5, "vector": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P"}}], "threatpost": [{"lastseen": "2020-10-14T22:24:13", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvelist": ["CVE-2020-0796", "CVE-2020-1181", "CVE-2020-1206", "CVE-2020-1214", "CVE-2020-1215", "CVE-2020-1216", "CVE-2020-1230", "CVE-2020-1260", "CVE-2020-1284", "CVE-2020-1286", "CVE-2020-1299", "CVE-2020-1300", "CVE-2020-1301", "CVE-2020-9633"], "description": "Microsoft has released patches for 129 vulnerabilities as part of its June Patch Tuesday updates \u2013 the highest number of CVEs ever released by Microsoft in a single month.\n\nWithin the blockbuster security update, 11 critical remote code-execution flaws were patched in Windows, SharePoint server, Windows Shell, VBScript and other products. Unlike other [recent monthly updates](<https://threatpost.com/april-patch-tuesday-microsoft-active-exploit/154794/>) from Microsoft, its [June updates](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-us/security-guidance>) did not include any zero-day vulnerabilities being actively attacked in the wild.\n\n\u201cFor June, Microsoft released patches for 129 CVEs covering Microsoft Windows, Internet Explorer (IE), Microsoft Edge (EdgeHTML-based and Chromium-based in IE Mode), ChakraCore, Office and Microsoft Office Services and Web Apps, Windows Defender, Microsoft Dynamics, Visual Studio, Azure DevOps, and Microsoft Apps for Android,\u201d according to Dustin Childs, with Trend Micro\u2019s Zero Day Initiative, [in a Tuesday post](<https://www.thezdi.com/blog/2020/6/9/the-june-2020-security-update-review>). \u201cThis brings the total number of Microsoft patches released this year to 616 \u2013 just 49 shy of the total number of CVEs they addressed in all of 2017.\u201d\n\n[](<https://threatpost.com/newsletter-sign/>)\n\nMicrosoft\u2019s June Patch Tuesday volume beats out the update from May, where it [released fixes for 111](<https://threatpost.com/microsoft-111-bugs-may-patch-tuesday/155669/>) security flaws, including 16 critical bugs and 96 that are rated important.\n\n## **SMBv3 Flaws**\n\nSatnam Narang, staff research engineer at Tenable, told Threatpost that a trio of fixes stuck out in the Patch Tuesday updates, for flaws in Microsoft Server Message Block (SMB). Two of these flaws exist in Microsoft Server Message Block 3.1.1 (SMBv3). All three vulnerabilities are notable because they\u2019re rated as \u201cexploitation more likely\u201d based on Microsoft\u2019s Exploitability Index.\n\nThe two flaws in SMBv3 include a denial-of-service vulnerability (CVE-2020-1284) and an information-disclosure vulnerability (CVE-2020-1206), both of which can be exploited by a remote, authenticated attacker.\n\nNarang said the flaws \u201cfollow in the footsteps\u201d of [CVE-2020-0796](<https://threatpost.com/wormable-unpatched-microsoft-bug/153632/>), a \u201cwormable\u201d remote code execution flaw in SMBv3 that was patched back in March, dubbed \u201cSMBGhost.\u201d CISA recently warned that the release of a fully [functional proof-of-concept](<https://threatpost.com/wormable-unpatched-microsoft-bug/153632/>) (PoC) for SMBGhost could soon spark a wave of cyberattacks.\n\nThe third vulnerability patched in Microsoft SMB, [CVE-2020-1301](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1301>), is a remote code-execution vulnerability that exists in the way SMBv1 handles requests. To exploit the flaw, an attacker would need to be authenticated and to send a specially crafted packet to a targeted SMBv1 server.\n\nNarang said this flaw \u201cmight create a sense of d\u00e9j\u00e0 vu\u201d for another remote code-execution vulnerability in SMBv1, [EternalBlue](<https://threatpost.com/nsas-eternalblue-exploit-ported-to-windows-10/126087/>), which was used in the [WannaCry 2017 ransomware attacks.](<https://threatpost.com/one-year-after-wannacry-a-fundamentally-changed-threat-landscape/132047/>)\n\n\u201cHowever, the difference between these two is that EternalBlue could be exploited by an unauthenticated attacker, whereas this flaw requires authentication, according to Microsoft,\u201d he said. \u201cThis vulnerability affects Windows 7 and Windows 2008, both of which reached their end of support in January 2020. However, Microsoft has provided patches for both operating systems.\u201d\n\n## **VBScript**\n\nVarious critical remote code-execution flaws were discovered in VBScript, Microsoft\u2019s Active Scripting language that is modeled on Visual Basic ([CVE-2020-1214](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1214>),[ CVE-2020-1215](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1215>), [CVE-2020-1216](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1216>), [CVE-2020-1230](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1230>), [CVE-2020-1260](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1260>)). The flaws exist in the way that the VBScript engine handles objects in memory; an attacker could corrupt memory in such a way that allows them to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user.\n\nIn a real-life attack scenario, an attacker could host a specially crafted website that is designed to exploit the vulnerability through Internet Explorer and then convince a user to view the website.\n\n\u201cAn attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the current user,\u201d said Microsoft. \u201cIf the current user is logged on with administrative-user rights, an attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability could take control of an affected system. An attacker could then install programs; view, change or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights.\u201d\n\n## **Other Critical Flaws**\n\nAlso of note is a critical flaw (CVE-2020-1299) that exists in [Microsoft Windows,](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1299>) which could allow remote code-execution if a .LNK file is processed. An .LNK file is a shortcut or \u201clink.\u201d An attacker can embed a malicious .LNK in a removable drive or remote share, and then convince the victim to open the drive or share in Windows Explorer. Then, the malicious binary will execute the code. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the local user, according to Microsoft.\n\nThe update also addressed a Windows [critical RCE flaw](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1300>) (CVE-2020-1300) that exists when Microsoft Windows fails to properly handle cabinet files. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would have to convince a user to either open a specially crafted cabinet file or spoof a network printer and trick a user into installing a malicious cabinet file disguised as a printer driver, according to Microsoft\u2019s update.\n\nAnother critical vulnerability (CVE-2020-1286) exists due to Windows Shell not properly validating file paths. An attacker could exploit the flaw by convincing a user to open a specially crafted file, and then would be able to run arbitrary code in the context of the user, [according to Microsoft\u2019s update](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1286>).\n\n\u201cIf the current user is logged on as an administrator, an attacker could take control of the affected system,\u201d said Microsoft. \u201cAn attacker could then install programs; view, change or delete data; or create new accounts with elevated privileges. Users whose accounts are configured to have fewer privileges on the system could be less impacted than users who operate with administrative privileges.\u201d\n\nA critical flaw ([CVE-2020-1181](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1181>)) in [SharePoint server](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1181>) was also fixed, stemming from the server failing to properly identify and filter unsafe ASP.Net web controls. The flaw can be abused by an authenticated, remote user who invokes a specially crafted page on an affected version of Microsoft SharePoint Server, allowing them to execute code.\n\nMicrosoft also issued [updates addressing Windows 10, 8.1 and Windows Server versions](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/ADV200010>) affected by a critical, use-after-free [Adobe Flash Player](<https://threatpost.com/adobe-warns-critical-flaws-flash-player-framemaker/156417/>) flaw ([CVE-2020-9633](<https://vulmon.com/vulnerabilitydetails?qid=CVE-2020-9633>)). According to Microsoft, \u201cIn a web-based attack scenario where the user is using Internet Explorer for the desktop, an attacker could host a specially crafted website that is designed to exploit any of these vulnerabilities through Internet Explorer and then convince a user to view the website.\u201d\n\nMeanwhile, Adobe earlier on Tuesday [released patches](<https://threatpost.com/adobe-warns-critical-flaws-flash-player-framemaker/156417/>) for four critical flaws in Flash Player and in its Framemaker document processor as part of its regularly scheduled updates. The bugs, if exploited, could enable arbitrary code-execution.\n", "modified": "2020-06-09T19:28:54", "published": "2020-06-09T19:28:54", "id": "THREATPOST:B2D0023D9A73CEE9C328A0927149D5B2", "href": "https://threatpost.com/microsoft-june-patch-tuesday-largest-ever-update/156430/", "type": "threatpost", "title": "Microsoft June Patch Tuesday Fixes 129 Flaws in Largest-Ever Update", "cvss": {"score": 10.0, "vector": "AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}], "securelist": [{"lastseen": "2020-09-03T13:05:29", "bulletinFamily": "blog", "cvelist": ["CVE-2017-0199", "CVE-2017-11882", "CVE-2017-8570", "CVE-2017-8759", "CVE-2018-0802", "CVE-2020-0796", "CVE-2020-1206", "CVE-2020-1299", "CVE-2020-1300", "CVE-2020-1301", "CVE-2020-1425", "CVE-2020-1457", "CVE-2020-6819", "CVE-2020-6820"], "description": "\n\n**[IT threat evolution Q2 2020. Review](<https://securelist.com/it-threat-evolution-q2-2020/98230/>) \n[IT threat evolution Q2 2020. Mobile statistics](<https://securelist.com/it-threat-evolution-q2-2020-mobile-statistics/98337/>)**\n\n_These statistics are based on detection verdicts of Kaspersky products received from users who consented to provide statistical data._\n\n## Quarterly figures\n\nAccording to Kaspersky Security Network, in Q2:\n\n * Kaspersky solutions blocked 899,744,810 attacks launched from online resources in 191 countries across the globe.\n * As many as 286,229,445 unique URLs triggered Web Anti-Virus components.\n * Attempted infections by malware designed to steal money via online access to bank accounts were logged on the computers of 181,725 unique users.\n * Ransomware attacks were defeated on the computers of 154,720 unique users.\n * Our File Anti-Virus detected 80,993,511 unique malware and potentially unwanted objects.\n\n## Financial threats\n\n### Financial threat statistics\n\nIn Q2 2020, Kaspersky solutions blocked attempts to launch one or more types of malware designed to steal money from bank accounts on the computers of 181,725 users.\n\n_Number of unique users attacked by financial malware, Q2 2020 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2020/08/31105102/16-en-malware_q2-2020_stats_non-mobile.png>))_\n\n**Geography of attacks**\n\nTo evaluate and compare the risk of being infected by banking Trojans and ATM/POS malware worldwide, for each country we calculated the share of users of Kaspersky products that faced this threat during the reporting period out of all users of our products in that country.\n\n_Geography of financial malware attacks, Q2 2020 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2020/08/31105134/17-en-malware_q2-2020_stats_non-mobile.png>))_\n\n**Top 10 countries by share of attacked users**\n\n| **Country*** | **%**** \n---|---|--- \n1 | Turkmenistan | 7.5 \n2 | Uzbekistan | 5.7 \n3 | Tajikistan | 5.6 \n4 | Afghanistan | 2.6 \n5 | Macedonia | 2.6 \n6 | Yemen | 2.2 \n7 | Syria | 1.9 \n8 | Kazakhstan | 1.7 \n9 | Cyprus | 1.7 \n10 | Iran | 1.5 \n \n_* Excluded are countries with relatively few Kaspersky product users (under 10,000). \n** Unique users of Kaspersky products whose computers were targeted by financial malware as a share of all unique users of Kaspersky products in the country._\n\nAmong the banking Trojan families, the share of Backdoor.Win32.Emotet decreased markedly from 21.3% to 6.6%. This botnet's activity decreased at the end of Q1 2020, but the results only became clear in the second quarter. However, as we prepared this report, we noticed that Emotet was gradually recovering.\n\n**Top 10 banking malware families**\n\n| Name | Verdicts | %* \n---|---|---|--- \n1 | Zbot | Trojan.Win32.Zbot | 24.8 | \n2 | RTM | Trojan-Banker.Win32.RTM | 18.6 | \n3 | CliptoShuffler | Trojan-Banker.Win32.CliptoShuffler | 15.4 | \n4 | Emotet | Backdoor.Win32.Emotet | 6.6 | \n5 | Trickster | Trojan.Win32.Trickster | 4.7 | \n6 | Nimnul | Virus.Win32.Nimnul | 4.3 | \n7 | Danabot | Trojan-Banker.Win32.Danabot | 3.4 | \n8 | SpyEye | Trojan-Spy.Win32.SpyEye | 3.0 | \n9 | Nymaim | Trojan.Win32.Nymaim | 2.5 | \n10 | Neurevt | Trojan.Win32.Neurevt | 1.4 | \n \n_** Unique users attacked by this __malware family as a percentage of all users attacked by financial malware._\n\n## Ransomware programs\n\n### Quarterly trend highlights\n\nThe attackers behind the Shade ransomware announced that they had ceased to distribute the Trojan. In addition, they published keys to decrypt files affected by all of its versions. The number of keys that had been accumulated over the years exceeded 750,000, and we [updated](<https://www.kaspersky.com/blog/shade-decryptor-2020/35246/>) our ShadeDecryptor utility to help Shade victims to regain access to their data.\n\nRansomware written in Go began surfacing more often than before. Examples of recently discovered Trojans include Sorena, Smaug, Hydra, Satan/M0rphine, etc. What is this: hackers showing an interest in new technology, ease of development or an attempt at making researchers' work harder? No one knows for sure.\n\n### Number of new modifications\n\nWe detected five new ransomware families and 4,406 new modifications of these malware programs in Q2 2020.\n\n_Number of new ransomware modifications detected, Q2 2019 \u2013 Q1 2020 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2020/08/31105223/sl_malware_q2_pc_03_18-malware_q2-2020_stats_non-mobile.png>))_\n\n### Number of users attacked by ransomware Trojans\n\nKaspersky products and technologies protected 154,720 users from ransomware attacks in Q2 2020.\n\n_Number of unique users attacked by ransomware Trojans, Q2 2020 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2020/08/31105258/19-en-malware_q2-2020_stats_non-mobile.png>))_\n\n### Geography of attacks\n\n_Geography of attacks by ransomware Trojans, Q2 2020 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2020/08/31105418/20-en-malware_q2-2020_stats_non-mobile.png>))_\n\n**Top 10 countries attacked by ransomware Trojans**\n\n| **Country*** | **%**** \n---|---|--- \n1 | Bangladesh | 1.69% \n2 | Mozambique | 1.16% \n3 | Uzbekistan | 1.14% \n4 | Egypt | 0.97% \n5 | Ethiopia | 0.94% \n6 | China | 0.74% \n7 | Afghanistan | 0.67% \n8 | Pakistan | 0.57% \n9 | Vietnam | 0.55% \n10 | Mongolia | 0.49% \n \n_* Excluded are countries with relatively few Kaspersky users (under 50,000). \n** Unique users whose computers were attacked by Trojan encryptors as a share of all unique users of Kaspersky products in the country._\n\n### Top 10 most common families of ransomware Trojans\n\n| **Name** | **Verdicts** | **%*** \n---|---|---|--- \n1 | WannaCry | Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Wanna | 14.74% | \n2 | (generic verdict) | Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Gen | 9.42% | \n3 | (generic verdict) | Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Generic | 7.47% | \n4 | (generic verdict) | Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Encoder | 7.11% | \n5 | Stop | Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Stop | 7.06% | \n6 | GandCrab | Trojan-Ransom.Win32.GandCrypt | 4.68% | \n7 | (generic verdict) | Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Crypren | 4.28% | \n8 | (generic verdict) | Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Phny | 3.29% | \n9 | Cerber | Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Zerber | 2.19% | \n10 | Crysis/Dharma | Trojan-Ransom.Win32.Crusis | 2.16% | \n| | | | | \n \n_* Unique Kaspersky users attacked by the specified family of ransomware Trojans as a percentage of all users __attacked by ransomware Trojans._\n\n## Miners\n\n### Number of new modifications\n\nKaspersky solutions detected 3,672 new miner modifications in Q2 2020, which is several dozen times fewer than in the previous quarter.\n\n_Number of new miner modifications, Q2 2020 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2020/08/31105534/21-en-malware_q2-2020_stats_non-mobile.png>))_\n\nThe difference can be explained by thousands of modifications of one miner family, which were detected in the first quarter. In the quarter under review, that miner's activity dwindled, which is reflected in the statistics.\n\n### Number of users attacked by miners\n\nWe detected miner attacks on the computers of 440,095 unique Kaspersky users worldwide in Q2 2020. This type of threats shows a clear downward trend.\n\n_Number of unique users attacked by miners, Q2 2020 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2020/08/31105631/22-en-malware_q2-2020_stats_non-mobile.png>))_\n\n### Geography of attacks\n\n_Geography of miner attacks, Q2 2020 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2020/08/31105702/23-en-malware_q2-2020_stats_non-mobile.png>))_\n\n**Top 10 countries attacked by miners**\n\n| **Country*** | **%**** \n---|---|--- \n1 | Afghanistan | 4.08% \n2 | Ethiopia | 4.04% \n3 | Uzbekistan | 2.68% \n4 | Tanzania | 2.57% \n5 | Vietnam | 2.17% \n6 | Rwanda | 2.11% \n7 | Kazakhstan | 2.08% \n8 | Sri Lanka | 1.97% \n9 | Mozambique | 1.78% \n10 | Belarus | 1.41% \n \n_* Excluded are countries with relatively few Kaspersky product users (under 50,000). \n** Unique users whose computers were attacked by miners as a share of all unique users of Kaspersky products in the country._\n\n## Vulnerable applications used by cybercriminals during cyberattacks\n\nExploit distribution statistics for Q2 2020, as before, show that vulnerabilities in the Microsoft Office suite are the most common ones. However, their share decreased to 72% in the last quarter. The same vulnerabilities we had seen before still topped the list. [CVE-2017-8570](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2017-8570>), which allows inserting a malicious script into an OLE object placed inside an Office document, was the most commonly exploited vulnerability. It was followed by the Q1 favorite, [CVE-2017-11882](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2017-11882>). This vulnerability exploits a stack overflow error in the Equation Editor component of the Office suite. CVE-2017-8570, a vulnerability similar to [CVE-2017-0199](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2017-0199>), came third. The remaining positions on the TOP 5 list were occupied by [CVE-2018-0802](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2018-0802>) and [CVE-2017-8759.](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2017-8759>)\n\nThe second category (exploits for popular browsers) accounted for about 12% in Q2, its share increasing slightly when compared to the previous period. During the reporting period, cybercriminals attacked Firefox using the [CVE-2020-6819](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-6819>) vulnerability, which allows malicious code to be executed when an HTTP header is parsed incorrectly. Exploits that use the vulnerabilities in the ReadableStream interface, such as [CVE-2020-6820](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-6820>), have been observed as well. No major vulnerability exploited to spread malware was observed during the reporting period for any of the other popular browsers: Google Chrome, Microsoft Edge, or Internet Explorer. However, fixes for a number of vulnerabilities that could potentially have been used for creating exploits, but were detected by researchers in time, were announced to software manufacturers.\n\n_Distribution of exploits used by cybercriminals, by type of attacked application, Q2 2020 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2020/08/31105735/sl_malware_q2_pc_09_24-malware_q2-2020_stats_non-mobile.png>))_\n\nThe first quarter set a trend for researching font and other graphic primitives subsystems in Windows. In Q2, two vulnerabilities were discovered in Windows Codecs Library, assigned [CVE-2020-1425](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1425>) and [CVE-2020-1457](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1457>) codes. Both were fixed, and neither is known to have been exploited in the wild. Another interesting vulnerability fixed in the last quarter is [CVE-2020-1300.](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1300>) It allows for remote execution of code due to incorrect processing of Cabinet files, for example, if the user is trying to run a malicious CAB file pretending to be a printer driver. Notably, the [CVE-2020-1299](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1299>) vulnerability allowed the attacker to execute arbitrary code with the user's privileges by generating a specially formatted LNK file.\n\nThe trend for brute-forcing of Remote Desktop Services, Microsoft SQL Services and SMB access passwords persisted in Q2 2020. No full-on network attacks that exploited new vulnerabilities in network exchange protocols were detected. However, software developers did discover and fix several vulnerabilities in popular network services. Among the most interesting ones were [CVE-2020-1301](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1301>) for SMBv1, which allowed the attacker to execute code remotely on a target system. [CVE-2020-0796](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-0796>) (SmbGhost), a popular SMBv3 vulnerability among researchers, received unexpected follow-up in the form of an exploit that allowed compromising the system without interacting with the user. The same protocol version was found to contain an error, designated as [CVE-2020-1206](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1206>) and known as the SMBleed vulnerability, which allowed the attacker to get a portion of the Windows kernel memory. The researchers even published several exploit versions that used a bundle of SMBleed and SMBGhost to execute the code with system privileges. In that mode, the attacker can install any software and access any information on the computer.\n\n## Attacks on Apple macOS\n\nIn Q2 2020, we discovered new versions of previously known threats and one new backdoor, which received the verdict of Backdoor.OSX.Lador.a. The malware is notable for being written in Go, a language gaining popularity as a means to create malware aimed at the macOS platform. If you compare the size of the Lador file with any backdoor created in Objective C, the difference will be very significant: the size of a Lador file is 5.5 megabytes, i.e. many times larger. And all this for the sake of remote access to the infected machine and execution of arbitrary code downloaded from the control center.\n\n**Top 20 threats for macOS **\n\n| Verdict | %* \n---|---|--- \n1 | Monitor.OSX.HistGrabber.b | 17.39 \n2 | Trojan-Downloader.OSX.Shlayer.a | 12.07 \n3 | AdWare.OSX.Pirrit.j | 9.10 \n4 | AdWare.OSX.Bnodlero.at | 8.21 \n5 | AdWare.OSX.Cimpli.k | 7.32 \n6 | AdWare.OSX.Pirrit.o | 5.57 \n7 | Trojan-Downloader.OSX.Agent.h | 4.19 \n8 | AdWare.OSX.Ketin.h | 4.03 \n9 | AdWare.OSX.Pirrit.x | 4.00 \n10 | AdWare.OSX.Spc.a | 3.98 \n11 | AdWare.OSX.Amc.c | 3.97 \n12 | Backdoor.OSX.Lador.a | 3.91 \n13 | AdWare.OSX.Pirrit.v | 3.22 \n14 | RiskTool.OSX.Spigot.a | 2.89 \n15 | AdWare.OSX.Bnodlero.t | 2.87 \n16 | AdWare.OSX.Cimpli.f | 2.85 \n17 | AdWare.OSX.Adload.g | 2.60 \n18 | AdWare.OSX.Pirrit.aa | 2.54 \n19 | AdWare.OSX.MacSearch.d | 2.44 \n20 | AdWare.OSX.Adload.h | 2.35 \n \n_* Unique users attacked by this malware as a percentage of all users of Kaspersky security solutions for macOS that were attacked._\n\nThe rankings of the most common threats for the macOS platform has not changed much compared to the previous quarter and is still largely made up of adware. As in Q1 2020, Shlayer (12.07%) was the most common Trojan. That malware loads adware from the Pirrit, Bnodlero and Cimpli families, which populate our TOP 20.\n\nThe Lador.a backdoor, which we mentioned above, entered the rankings along with adware.\n\nFinally, in Q2 2020, a group of potentially unwanted programs collectively detected as HistGrabber.b joined the rankings. The main purpose of such software is to unpack archives, but HistGrabber.b also quietly uploaded the user's browsing history to the developer's servers. This is [nothing new](<https://www.pcworld.com/article/3516502/report-avast-and-avg-collect-and-sell-your-personal-info-via-their-free-antivirus-programs.html>): all applications that steal browsing history have long been withdrawn from the App Store, and servers that could receive the data, disabled. Nevertheless, we deem it necessary to inform users of any such software discovered on their devices.\n\n### Threat geography\n\n_Threat geography for the macOS platform, Q2 2020 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2020/08/31105816/25-en-malware_q2-2020_stats_non-mobile.png>))_\n\n**TOP 10 countries**\n\n| **Country*** | **%**** \n---|---|--- \n1 | Spain | 9.82% \n2 | France | 7.73% \n3 | Mexico | 6.70% \n4 | Italy | 6.54% \n5 | India | 6.47% \n6 | Canada | 6.34% \n7 | Brazil | 6.25% \n8 | USA | 5.99% \n9 | United Kingdom | 5.90% \n10 | Russia | 5.77% \n \n_* Excluded from the rating are countries with relatively few users of Kaspersky security solutions for MacOS (under 5,000). \n** Unique users attacked in the country as a percentage of all users of Kaspersky security solutions for MacOS in the same country._\n\nThe most common threats in all the countries on the list without exception bundled various adware with the Shlayer Trojan.\n\n## IoT attacks\n\n### IoT threat statistics\n\nQ2 2020 saw no dramatic change in cybercriminal activity targeting IoT devices: attackers most frequently ran Telnet login and password brute-force campaigns.\n\nTelnet | 80.83% \n---|--- \nSSH | 19.17% \n \n_Distribution of attacked services by number of unique IP addresses of attacking devices, Q2 2020_\n\nFurther communication with IoT devices that pretended to be infected (and actually traps), was much more often conducted via Telnet.\n\nTelnet | 71.52% \n---|--- \nSSH | 28.48% \n \n_Distribution of cybercriminals' working sessions with Kaspersky traps, Q2 2020_\n\n_Geography of IP addresses of device from which attacks on Kaspersky Telnet traps originated, Q2 2020 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2020/08/31105906/26-en-malware_q2-2020_stats_non-mobile.png>))_\n\n**TOP 10 countries by location of devices from which Telnet-based attacks were carried out on Kaspersky traps**\n\n**Country** | **%*** \n---|--- \nChina | 12.75% \nBrazil | 11.88% \nEgypt | 8.32% \nTaiwan | 6.58% \nIran | 5.17% \nIndia | 4.84% \nRussia | 4.76% \nVietnam | 3.59% \nGreece | 3.22% \nUSA | 2.94% \n \n_* Share of devices from which attacks were carried out in the country out of the total number of devices_\n\nThe three countries with the most devices that launched attacks on Kaspersky Telnet traps remained virtually unchanged. China (12.75%) was first, while Brazil (11.88%) and Egypt (8.32%) swapped positions.\n\n_Geography of IP addresses of device from which attacks on Kaspersky SSH traps originated, Q2 2020 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2020/08/31105939/27-en-malware_q2-2020_stats_non-mobile.png>))_\n\n**TOP 10 countries by location of devices from which SSH-based attacks were carried out on Kaspersky traps**\n\n**Country** | **%*** \n---|--- \nChina | 22.12% \nUSA | 10.91% \nVietnam | 8.20% \nBrazil | 5.34% \nGermany | 4.68% \nRussia | 4.44% \nFrance | 3.42% \nIndia | 3.01% \nEgypt | 2.77% \nSingapore | 2.59% \n \n_* Share of devices from which attacks were carried out in the country out of the total number of devices_\n\nAs with Telnet, the three countries where the most attacks on SSH traps originated remained unchanged from Q1 2020: China (22.12%), U.S. (10.91%) and Vietnam (8.20%).\n\n### Threats loaded into traps\n\n**Verdict** | **%*** \n---|--- \nTrojan-Downloader.Linux.NyaDrop.b | 32.78 \nBackdoor.Linux.Mirai.b | 17.47 \nHEUR:Backdoor.Linux.Mirai.b | 12.72 \nHEUR:Backdoor.Linux.Gafgyt.a | 9.76 \nBackdoor.Linux.Mirai.ba | 7.99 \nHEUR:Backdoor.Linux.Mirai.ba | 4.49 \nBackdoor.Linux.Gafgyt.bj | 2.23 \nHEUR:Trojan-Downloader.Shell.Agent.p | 1.66 \nBackdoor.Linux.Mirai.cn | 1.26 \nHEUR:Backdoor.Linux.Mirai.c | 0.73 \n \n_* Share of the malware type in the total amount of malware downloaded to IoT devices following a successful attack._\n\nAs in the first quarter, the NyaDrop Trojan led by the number of loads onto traps. The Mirai Trojan family retained its relevance in Q2 2020, occupying half of our IoT threat rankings.\n\n## Attacks via web resources\n\n_The statistics in this section are based on Web Anti-Virus, which protects users when malicious objects are downloaded from malicious/infected web pages. Malicious websites are specially created by cybercriminals; web resources with user-created content (for example, forums), as well as hacked legitimate resources, can be infected._\n\n### Countries that are sources of web-based attacks: TOP 10\n\n_The following statistics show the distribution by country of the sources of Internet attacks blocked by Kaspersky products on user computers (web pages with redirects to exploits, sites containing exploits and other malicious programs, botnet C2 centers, etc.). Any unique host could be the source of one or more web-based attacks._\n\n_To determine the geographical source of web-based attacks, domain names are matched against their actual domain IP addresses, and then the geographical location of a specific IP address (GEOIP) is established._\n\nIn Q2 2020, Kaspersky solutions defeated 899,744,810 attacks launched from online resources located in 191 countries across the globe. A total of 286,229,445 unique URLs were recognized as malicious by Web Anti-Virus components.\n\n_Distribution of web-based attack sources by country, Q2 2020 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2020/08/31110037/28-en-malware_q2-2020_stats_non-mobile.png>))_\n\n### Countries where users faced the greatest risk of online infection\n\nTo assess the risk of online infection faced by users in different countries, for each country we calculated the share of Kaspersky users on whose computers Web Anti-Virus was triggered during the quarter. The resulting data provides an indication of the aggressiveness of the environment in which computers operate in different countries.\n\nThis rating only includes attacks by malicious objects that fall under the **_Malware class_**; it does not include Web Anti-Virus triggers in response to potentially dangerous or unwanted programs, such as RiskTool or adware.\n\n| Country* | % of attacked users** \n---|---|--- \n1 | Algeria | 11.2052 \n2 | Mongolia | 11.0337 \n3 | Albania | 9.8699 \n4 | France | 9.8668 \n5 | Tunisia | 9.6513 \n6 | Bulgaria | 9.5252 \n7 | Libya | 8.5995 \n8 | Morocco | 8.4784 \n9 | Greece | 8.3735 \n10 | Vietnam | 8.2298 \n11 | Somalia | 8.0938 \n12 | Georgia | 7.9888 \n13 | Malaysia | 7.9866 \n14 | Latvia | 7.8978 \n15 | UAE | 7.8675 \n16 | Qatar | 7.6820 \n17 | Angola | 7.5147 \n18 | R\u00e9union | 7.4958 \n19 | Laos | 7.4757 \n20 | Mozambique | 7.4702 \n \n_* Excluded are countries with relatively few Kaspersky users (under 10,000). \n** Unique users targeted by **Malware-class** attacks as a share of all unique Kaspersky users in the country._\n\n_These statistics are based on detection verdicts returned by the Web Anti-Virus module that were received from users of Kaspersky products who consented to provide statistical data._\n\nOn average, 5.73% of Internet user computers worldwide experienced at least one **Malware-class** attack.\n\n_Geography of malicious web-based attacks, Q2 2020 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2020/08/31110110/29-en-malware_q2-2020_stats_non-mobile.png>))_\n\n## Local threats\n\n_In this section, we analyze statistical data obtained from the OAS and ODS modules in Kaspersky products. It takes into account malicious programs that were found directly on users' computers or removable media connected to computers (flash drives, camera memory cards, phones, external hard drives), or which initially made their way onto the computer in non-open form (for example, programs included in complex installers, encrypted files, etc.)._\n\nIn Q2 2020, our File Anti-Virus detected **80,993,511** malware and potentially unwanted objects.\n\n### Countries where users faced the highest risk of local infection\n\nFor each country, we calculated the percentage of Kaspersky users on whose computers File Anti-Virus was triggered during the reporting period. These statistics reflect the level of personal computer infection in different countries.\n\nNote that the rating includes only **Malware-class** attacks; it does not include File Anti-Virus triggers in response to potentially dangerous or unwanted programs, such as RiskTool or adware.\n\n| Country* | % of attacked users** \n---|---|--- \n1 | Turkmenistan | 48.0224 \n2 | Uzbekistan | 42.2632 \n3 | Tajikistan | 42.1279 \n4 | Ethiopia | 41.7213 \n5 | Afghanistan | 40.6278 \n6 | Myanmar | 39.1377 \n7 | Burkina Faso | 37.4560 \n8 | Benin | 37.4390 \n9 | China | 36.7346 \n10 | Kyrgyzstan | 36.0847 \n11 | Vietnam | 35.4327 \n12 | Mauritania | 34.2613 \n13 | Laos | 34.0350 \n14 | Mongolia | 33.6261 \n15 | Burundi | 33.4323 \n16 | Belarus | 33.0937 \n17 | Guinea | 33.0097 \n18 | Mali | 32.9902 \n19 | Togo | 32.6962 \n20 | Cameroon | 32.6347 \n \n_* Excluded are countries with relatively few Kaspersky users (under 10,000). \n__** Unique users on whose computers **Malware-class** local threats were blocked, as a share of all unique users of Kaspersky products in the country._\n\n_Geography of local infection attempts, Q2 2020 ([download](<https://media.kasperskycontenthub.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/43/2020/08/31110144/30-en-malware_q2-2020_stats_non-mobile.png>))_\n\nOverall, 17.05% of user computers globally faced at least one **Malware-class** local threat during Q2 2020.", "modified": "2020-09-03T10:30:23", "published": "2020-09-03T10:30:23", "id": "SECURELIST:CE954DA57A5EE857B62F0E00D36A5003", "href": "https://securelist.com/it-threat-evolution-q2-2020-pc-statistics/98292/", "type": "securelist", "title": "IT threat evolution Q2 2020. PC statistics", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}], "kaspersky": [{"lastseen": "2020-09-17T03:22:39", "bulletinFamily": "info", "cvelist": ["CVE-2020-1244", "CVE-2020-1253", "CVE-2020-1203", "CVE-2020-1277", "CVE-2020-1207", "CVE-2020-1275", "CVE-2020-1287", "CVE-2020-1237", "CVE-2020-1272", "CVE-2020-1300", "CVE-2020-1276", "CVE-2020-0916", "CVE-2020-1235", "CVE-2020-1290", "CVE-2020-1278", "CVE-2020-1263", "CVE-2020-1310", "CVE-2020-1251", "CVE-2020-1274", "CVE-2020-1301", "CVE-2020-1254", "CVE-2020-1212", "CVE-2020-1280", "CVE-2020-1211", "CVE-2020-1279", "CVE-2020-1273", "CVE-2020-1284", "CVE-2020-1120", "CVE-2020-1306", "CVE-2020-1305", "CVE-2020-1160", "CVE-2020-1236", "CVE-2020-1266", "CVE-2020-1311", "CVE-2020-1258", "CVE-2020-1317", "CVE-2020-1334", "CVE-2020-1307", "CVE-2020-1259", "CVE-2020-1257", "CVE-2020-0986", "CVE-2020-1262", "CVE-2020-1209", "CVE-2020-1199", "CVE-2020-1231", "CVE-2020-1281", "CVE-2020-1313", "CVE-2020-1255", "CVE-2020-1232", "CVE-2020-1299", "CVE-2020-1302", "CVE-2020-1296", "CVE-2020-1222", "CVE-2020-1241", "CVE-2020-1292", "CVE-2020-1234", "CVE-2020-1247", "CVE-2020-1304", "CVE-2020-1324", "CVE-2020-1312", "CVE-2020-1271", "CVE-2020-1246", "CVE-2020-1261", "CVE-2020-1348", "CVE-2020-1314", "CVE-2020-1282", "CVE-2020-1208", "CVE-2020-1204", "CVE-2020-1239", "CVE-2020-1269", "CVE-2020-1233", "CVE-2020-1194", "CVE-2020-0915", "CVE-2020-1265", "CVE-2020-1268", "CVE-2020-1162", "CVE-2020-1316", "CVE-2020-1294", "CVE-2020-1293", "CVE-2020-1238", "CVE-2020-1286", "CVE-2020-1206", "CVE-2020-1264", "CVE-2020-1196", "CVE-2020-1309", "CVE-2020-1201", "CVE-2020-1270", "CVE-2020-1248", "CVE-2020-1202", "CVE-2020-1291", "CVE-2020-1217", "CVE-2020-1197", "CVE-2020-1283"], "description": "### *Detect date*:\n06/09/2020\n\n### *Severity*:\nCritical\n\n### *Description*:\nMultiple vulnerabilities were found in Microsoft Windows. Malicious users can exploit these vulnerabilities to obtain sensitive information, execute arbitrary code, gain privileges, cause denial of service, bypass security restrictions.\n\n### *Affected products*:\nWindows 10 Version 1809 for 32-bit Systems \nWindows 10 Version 1803 for x64-based Systems \nWindows 10 for 32-bit Systems \nWindows 10 Version 1607 for x64-based Systems \nWindows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) \nWindows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) \nWindows 10 Version 1903 for 32-bit Systems \nWindows Server 2008 for 32-bit Systems Service Pack 2 (Server Core installation) \nWindows 10 Version 1709 for x64-based Systems \nWindows Server 2008 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 2 (Server Core installation) \nWindows Server, version 1803 (Server Core Installation) \nWindows Server 2012 R2 \nWindows 10 Version 1709 for 32-bit Systems \nWindows 10 Version 1803 for 32-bit Systems \nWindows 10 Version 1909 for 32-bit Systems \nWindows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) \nMicrosoft Visual Studio 2019 version 16.6 (includes 16.0 - 16.5) \nMicrosoft Visual Studio 2015 Update 3 \nWindows Server 2019 \nWindows 10 Version 2004 for ARM64-based Systems \nWindows 10 Version 2004 for x64-based Systems \nMicrosoft Visual Studio 2019 version 16.4 (includes 16.0 - 16.3) \nWindows Server 2008 for 32-bit Systems Service Pack 2 \nWindows 10 Version 1903 for x64-based Systems \nWindows 8.1 for 32-bit systems \nWindows 10 Version 1809 for ARM64-based Systems \nWindows Server, version 2004 (Server Core installation) \nMicrosoft Visual Studio 2017 version 15.9 (includes 15.0 - 15.8) \nWindows 10 Version 1607 for 32-bit Systems \nWindows 8.1 for x64-based systems \nWindows Server 2008 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 2 \nWindows 10 Version 1803 for ARM64-based Systems \nMicrosoft Visual Studio 2019 version 16.0 \nWindows Server, version 1909 (Server Core installation) \nWindows 10 Version 1909 for x64-based Systems \nWindows 10 for x64-based Systems \nWindows Server 2008 R2 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1 \nWindows 10 Version 1709 for ARM64-based Systems \nWindows 10 Version 1809 for x64-based Systems \nWindows Server 2012 \nWindows 10 Version 1903 for ARM64-based Systems \nWindows RT 8.1 \nWindows 10 Version 1909 for ARM64-based Systems \nWindows Server 2016 \nWindows 10 Version 2004 for HoloLens \nWindows 10 Version 2004 for 32-bit Systems \nWindows Server 2008 R2 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1 (Server Core installation) \nWindows 7 for x64-based Systems Service Pack 1 \nWindows 10 Version 1903 for HoloLens \nWindows 10 Version 1809 for HoloLens \nWindows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) \nWindows 7 for 32-bit Systems Service Pack 1 \nWindows Server, version 1903 (Server Core installation)\n\n### *Solution*:\nInstall necessary updates from the KB section, that are listed in your Windows Update (Windows Update usually can be accessed from the Control Panel)\n\n### *Original advisories*:\n[CVE-2020-0986](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-0986>) \n[CVE-2020-1348](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1348>) \n[CVE-2020-1264](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1264>) \n[CVE-2020-1265](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1265>) \n[CVE-2020-1266](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1266>) \n[CVE-2020-1261](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1261>) \n[CVE-2020-1262](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1262>) \n[CVE-2020-1263](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1263>) \n[CVE-2020-1268](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1268>) \n[CVE-2020-1269](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1269>) \n[CVE-2020-1299](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1299>) \n[CVE-2020-1291](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1291>) \n[CVE-2020-1290](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1290>) \n[CVE-2020-1293](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1293>) \n[CVE-2020-1292](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1292>) \n[CVE-2020-1294](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1294>) \n[CVE-2020-1296](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1296>) \n[CVE-2020-1160](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1160>) \n[CVE-2020-1259](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1259>) \n[CVE-2020-1311](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1311>) \n[CVE-2020-1211](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1211>) \n[CVE-2020-1162](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1162>) \n[CVE-2020-1212](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1212>) \n[CVE-2020-1217](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1217>) \n[CVE-2020-1282](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1282>) \n[CVE-2020-1283](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1283>) \n[CVE-2020-1280](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1280>) \n[CVE-2020-1281](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1281>) \n[CVE-2020-1286](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1286>) \n[CVE-2020-1287](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1287>) \n[CVE-2020-1284](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1284>) \n[CVE-2020-1202](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1202>) \n[CVE-2020-1203](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1203>) \n[CVE-2020-1201](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1201>) \n[CVE-2020-1206](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1206>) \n[CVE-2020-1207](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1207>) \n[CVE-2020-1204](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1204>) \n[CVE-2020-1324](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1324>) \n[CVE-2020-1208](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1208>) \n[CVE-2020-1209](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1209>) \n[CVE-2020-1239](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1239>) \n[CVE-2020-1238](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1238>) \n[CVE-2020-1237](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1237>) \n[CVE-2020-1236](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1236>) \n[CVE-2020-1235](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1235>) \n[CVE-2020-1234](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1234>) \n[CVE-2020-1233](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1233>) \n[CVE-2020-1232](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1232>) \n[CVE-2020-1231](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1231>) \n[CVE-2020-1334](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1334>) \n[CVE-2020-1222](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1222>) \n[CVE-2020-1309](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1309>) \n[CVE-2020-1302](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1302>) \n[CVE-2020-1301](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1301>) \n[CVE-2020-1300](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1300>) \n[CVE-2020-1307](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1307>) \n[CVE-2020-1306](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1306>) \n[CVE-2020-1305](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1305>) \n[CVE-2020-1304](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1304>) \n[CVE-2020-1196](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1196>) \n[CVE-2020-1197](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1197>) \n[CVE-2020-1194](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1194>) \n[CVE-2020-1199](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1199>) \n[CVE-2020-1120](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1120>) \n[CVE-2020-1314](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1314>) \n[CVE-2020-1316](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1316>) \n[CVE-2020-1317](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1317>) \n[CVE-2020-1310](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1310>) \n[CVE-2020-1258](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1258>) \n[CVE-2020-1312](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1312>) \n[CVE-2020-1313](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1313>) \n[CVE-2020-1255](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1255>) \n[CVE-2020-1254](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1254>) \n[CVE-2020-1257](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1257>) \n[CVE-2020-1251](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1251>) \n[CVE-2020-1253](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1253>) \n[CVE-2020-1248](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1248>) \n[CVE-2020-1246](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1246>) \n[CVE-2020-1247](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1247>) \n[CVE-2020-1244](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1244>) \n[CVE-2020-1241](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1241>) \n[CVE-2020-0915](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-0915>) \n[CVE-2020-0916](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-0916>) \n[CVE-2020-1279](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1279>) \n[CVE-2020-1278](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1278>) \n[CVE-2020-1273](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1273>) \n[CVE-2020-1272](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1272>) \n[CVE-2020-1271](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1271>) \n[CVE-2020-1270](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1270>) \n[CVE-2020-1277](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1277>) \n[CVE-2020-1276](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1276>) \n[CVE-2020-1275](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1275>) \n[CVE-2020-1274](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/api/security-guidance/en-US/CVE/CVE-2020-1274>) \n\n\n### *Impacts*:\nACE \n\n### *Related products*:\n[Microsoft Visual Studio](<https://threats.kaspersky.com/en/product/Microsoft-Visual-Studio/>)\n\n### *CVE-IDS*:\n[CVE-2020-1160](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1160>)2.1Warning \n[CVE-2020-1281](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1281>)6.8High \n[CVE-2020-1287](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1287>)6.8High \n[CVE-2020-1348](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1348>)4.3Warning \n[CVE-2020-1301](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1301>)6.5High \n[CVE-2020-1207](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1207>)7.2High \n[CVE-2020-1262](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1262>)7.2High \n[CVE-2020-1263](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1263>)2.1Warning \n[CVE-2020-1246](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1246>)7.2High \n[CVE-2020-1247](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1247>)7.2High \n[CVE-2020-1208](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1208>)9.3Critical \n[CVE-2020-1300](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1300>)6.8High \n[CVE-2020-1196](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1196>)4.6Warning \n[CVE-2020-1194](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1194>)4.9Warning \n[CVE-2020-1299](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1299>)9.3Critical \n[CVE-2020-1291](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1291>)6.8High \n[CVE-2020-1317](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1317>)9.0Critical \n[CVE-2020-1239](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1239>)6.8High \n[CVE-2020-1236](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1236>)9.3Critical \n[CVE-2020-1314](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1314>)6.8High \n[CVE-2020-1212](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1212>)6.8High \n[CVE-2020-1311](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1311>)6.8High \n[CVE-2020-1255](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1255>)6.5High \n[CVE-2020-1254](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1254>)7.2High \n[CVE-2020-1271](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1271>)4.6Warning \n[CVE-2020-1270](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1270>)4.6Warning \n[CVE-2020-1251](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1251>)7.2High \n[CVE-2020-1253](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1253>)7.2High \n[CVE-2020-1272](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1272>)7.2High \n[CVE-2020-1302](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1302>)4.6Warning \n[CVE-2020-0986](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-0986>)7.2High \n[CVE-2020-1264](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1264>)4.6Warning \n[CVE-2020-1265](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1265>)4.6Warning \n[CVE-2020-1266](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1266>)7.2High \n[CVE-2020-1261](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1261>)2.1Warning \n[CVE-2020-1268](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1268>)2.1Warning \n[CVE-2020-1269](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1269>)7.2High \n[CVE-2020-1290](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1290>)2.1Warning \n[CVE-2020-1293](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1293>)4.6Warning \n[CVE-2020-1292](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1292>)6.8High \n[CVE-2020-1294](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1294>)6.8High \n[CVE-2020-1296](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1296>)2.1Warning \n[CVE-2020-1259](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1259>)4.0Warning \n[CVE-2020-1211](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1211>)6.8High \n[CVE-2020-1162](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1162>)4.6Warning \n[CVE-2020-1217](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1217>)6.8High \n[CVE-2020-1282](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1282>)6.8High \n[CVE-2020-1283](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1283>)7.1High \n[CVE-2020-1280](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1280>)6.8High \n[CVE-2020-1286](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1286>)9.3Critical \n[CVE-2020-1284](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1284>)4.3Warning \n[CVE-2020-1202](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1202>)7.2High \n[CVE-2020-1203](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1203>)7.2High \n[CVE-2020-1201](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1201>)7.2High \n[CVE-2020-1206](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1206>)5.0Critical \n[CVE-2020-1204](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1204>)3.6Warning \n[CVE-2020-1324](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1324>)4.6Warning \n[CVE-2020-1209](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1209>)6.8High \n[CVE-2020-1238](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1238>)6.8High \n[CVE-2020-1237](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1237>)6.8High \n[CVE-2020-1235](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1235>)6.8High \n[CVE-2020-1234](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1234>)6.8High \n[CVE-2020-1233](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1233>)6.8High \n[CVE-2020-1232](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1232>)4.3Warning \n[CVE-2020-1231](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1231>)6.8High \n[CVE-2020-1334](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1334>)4.6Warning \n[CVE-2020-1222](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1222>)4.6Warning \n[CVE-2020-1309](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1309>)6.8High \n[CVE-2020-1307](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1307>)9.3Critical \n[CVE-2020-1306](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1306>)4.6Warning \n[CVE-2020-1305](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1305>)6.8High \n[CVE-2020-1304](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1304>)6.8High \n[CVE-2020-1197](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1197>)7.2High \n[CVE-2020-1199](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1199>)7.2High \n[CVE-2020-1120](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1120>)4.9Warning \n[CVE-2020-1316](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1316>)7.2High \n[CVE-2020-1310](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1310>)7.2High \n[CVE-2020-1258](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1258>)7.2High \n[CVE-2020-1312](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1312>)4.6Warning \n[CVE-2020-1313](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1313>)6.8High \n[CVE-2020-1257](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1257>)4.6Warning \n[CVE-2020-1248](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1248>)9.3Critical \n[CVE-2020-1244](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1244>)5.8High \n[CVE-2020-1241](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1241>)6.8High \n[CVE-2020-0915](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-0915>)7.2High \n[CVE-2020-0916](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-0916>)7.2High \n[CVE-2020-1279](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1279>)4.6Warning \n[CVE-2020-1278](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1278>)4.6Warning \n[CVE-2020-1273](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1273>)4.6Warning \n[CVE-2020-1277](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1277>)4.6Warning \n[CVE-2020-1276](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1276>)4.6Warning \n[CVE-2020-1275](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1275>)4.6Warning \n[CVE-2020-1274](<https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-1274>)4.6Warning\n\n### *KB list*:\n[4549951](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/4549951>) \n[4556799](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/4556799>) \n[4561669](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/4561669>) \n[4561645](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/4561645>) \n[4561643](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/4561643>) \n[4561670](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/4561670>) \n[4561649](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/4561649>) \n[4560960](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/4560960>) \n[4557957](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/4557957>) \n[4561666](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/4561666>) \n[4561602](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/4561602>) \n[4561612](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/4561612>) \n[4561674](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/4561674>) \n[4561616](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/4561616>) \n[4561608](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/4561608>) \n[4561621](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/4561621>) \n[4561673](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/4561673>) \n[4562053](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/4562053>) \n[4570333](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/4570333>) \n[4574727](<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/4574727>)\n\n### *Microsoft official advisories*:", "edition": 2, "modified": "2020-09-10T00:00:00", "published": "2020-06-09T00:00:00", "id": "KLA11807", "href": "https://threats.kaspersky.com/en/vulnerability/KLA11807", "title": "\r KLA11807Multiple vulnerabilities in Microsoft Windows ", "type": "kaspersky", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}], "nessus": [{"lastseen": "2020-10-14T09:41:16", "description": "The remote Windows host is missing security update 4557957.\nIt is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities :\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way that the wlansvc.dll handles objects in memory. An\n attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability\n could execute code with elevated permissions.\n (CVE-2020-1270)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Windows kernel fails to properly handle objects in\n memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could run arbitrary code in kernel mode.\n An attacker could then install programs; view, change,\n or delete data; or create new accounts with full user\n rights. (CVE-2020-0986, CVE-2020-1246, CVE-2020-1262,\n CVE-2020-1264, CVE-2020-1266, CVE-2020-1269,\n CVE-2020-1273, CVE-2020-1274, CVE-2020-1275,\n CVE-2020-1276, CVE-2020-1307, CVE-2020-1316)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the\n Windows GDI component improperly discloses the contents\n of its memory. An attacker who successfully exploited\n the vulnerability could obtain information to further\n compromise the users system. There are multiple ways an\n attacker could exploit the vulnerability, such as by\n convincing a user to open a specially crafted document,\n or by convincing a user to visit an untrusted webpage.\n The security update addresses the vulnerability by\n correcting how the Windows GDI component handles objects\n in memory. (CVE-2020-1348)\n\n - A vulnerability exists in the way the Windows\n Diagnostics & feedback settings app handles objects\n in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could cause additional diagnostic data\n from the affected device to be sent to Microsoft.\n (CVE-2020-1296)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way\n that the VBScript engine handles objects in memory. The\n vulnerability could corrupt memory in such a way that an\n attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of\n the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited\n the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the\n current user. (CVE-2020-1213, CVE-2020-1214,\n CVE-2020-1215, CVE-2020-1216, CVE-2020-1230)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the\n win32k component improperly provides kernel information.\n An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability\n could obtain information to further compromise the users\n system. (CVE-2020-1290)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists when\n Microsoft Windows OLE fails to properly validate user\n input. An attacker could exploit the vulnerability to\n execute malicious code. (CVE-2020-1281)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the\n way Windows Error Reporting (WER) handles objects in\n memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could obtain information to further\n compromise the users system. (CVE-2020-1261,\n CVE-2020-1263)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Windows Background Intelligent Transfer Service (BITS)\n IIS module improperly handles uploaded content. An\n attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability\n could upload restricted file types to an IIS-hosted\n folder. (CVE-2020-1255)\n\n - A denial of service vulnerability exists when Connected\n User Experiences and Telemetry Service improperly\n handles file operations. An attacker who successfully\n exploited this vulnerability could cause a system to\n stop responding. (CVE-2020-1120, CVE-2020-1244)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when\n Windows Error Reporting manager improperly handles a\n process crash. An attacker who successfully exploited\n this vulnerability could delete a targeted file leading\n to an elevated status. (CVE-2020-1197)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way that the Windows Network Connections Service handles\n objects in memory. An attacker who successfully\n exploited the vulnerability could execute code with\n elevated permissions. (CVE-2020-1291)\n\n - A memory corruption vulnerability exists when Windows\n Media Foundation improperly handles objects in memory.\n An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability\n could install programs; view, change, or delete data; or\n create new accounts with full user rights. There are\n multiple ways an attacker could exploit the\n vulnerability, such as by convincing a user to open a\n specially crafted document, or by convincing a user to\n visit a malicious webpage. The security update addresses\n the vulnerability by correcting how Windows Media\n Foundation handles objects in memory. (CVE-2020-1238,\n CVE-2020-1239)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Windows Feedback Hub improperly handles objects in\n memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could run processes in an elevated\n context. (CVE-2020-1199)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the\n way that the Microsoft Server Message Block 3.1.1\n (SMBv3) protocol handles certain requests. An attacker\n who successfully exploited the vulnerability could\n obtain information to further compromise the users\n system. (CVE-2020-1206)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Diagnostics Hub Standard Collector or the Visual Studio\n Standard Collector fail to properly handle objects in\n memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could run processes in an elevated\n context. (CVE-2020-1202, CVE-2020-1203)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when\n Windows Mobile Device Management (MDM) Diagnostics\n improperly handles junctions. An attacker who\n successfully exploited this vulnerability could bypass\n access restrictions to delete files. (CVE-2020-1204)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way the Windows Now Playing Session Manager handles\n objects in memory. An attacker who successfully\n exploited this vulnerability could run processes in an\n elevated context. An attacker could then install\n programs; view, change or delete data. (CVE-2020-1201)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Windows Backup Service improperly handles file\n operations. (CVE-2020-1271)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the\n Windows Jet Database Engine improperly handles objects\n in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could execute arbitrary code on a victim\n system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by\n enticing a victim to open a specially crafted file. The\n update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the way\n the Windows Jet Database Engine handles objects in\n memory. (CVE-2020-1208, CVE-2020-1236)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way that the Connected Devices Platform Service handles\n objects in memory. An attacker who successfully\n exploited the vulnerability could execute code with\n elevated permissions. (CVE-2020-1211)\n\n - A security feature bypass vulnerability exists when\n Windows Kernel fails to properly sanitize certain\n parameters. (CVE-2020-1241)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Diagnostics Hub Standard Collector Service improperly\n handles file operations. An attacker who successfully\n exploited this vulnerability could gain elevated\n privileges. An attacker with unprivileged access to a\n vulnerable system could exploit this vulnerability. The\n security update addresses the vulnerability by ensuring\n the Diagnostics Hub Standard Collector Service properly\n handles file operations. (CVE-2020-1257, CVE-2020-1278,\n CVE-2020-1293)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way that the Windows Bluetooth Service handles objects\n in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the\n vulnerability could execute code with elevated\n permissions. (CVE-2020-1280)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way\n that the Windows Graphics Device Interface (GDI) handles\n objects in the memory. An attacker who successfully\n exploited this vulnerability could take control of the\n affected system. An attacker could then install\n programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new\n accounts with full user rights. (CVE-2020-1248)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n Windows Installer when the Windows Installer fails to\n properly sanitize input leading to an insecure library\n loading behavior. A locally authenticated attacker could\n run arbitrary code with elevated system privileges. An\n attacker could then install programs; view, change, or\n delete data; or create new accounts with full user\n rights. The security update addresses the vulnerability\n by correcting the input sanitization error to preclude\n unintended elevation. (CVE-2020-1272)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the\n Windows Runtime improperly handles objects in memory. An\n attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability\n could read memory that was freed and might run arbitrary\n code in an elevated context. An attacker could exploit\n this vulnerability by running a specially crafted\n application on the victim system. The update addresses\n the vulnerability by correcting the way the Windows\n Runtime handles objects in memory. (CVE-2020-1217)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists when\n Internet Explorer improperly handles objects in memory.\n An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability\n could obtain information to further compromise the users\n system. (CVE-2020-1315)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way that the Windows WalletService handles objects in\n memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the\n vulnerability could execute code with elevated\n permissions. (CVE-2020-1287, CVE-2020-1294)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists when a\n Windows service improperly handles objects in memory. An\n attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability\n could obtain information to further compromise the users\n system. (CVE-2020-1268)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Windows Update Orchestrator Service improperly handles\n file operations. An attacker who successfully exploited\n this vulnerability could run processes in an elevated\n context. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by\n running a specially crafted application on the victim\n system. The update addresses the vulnerability by\n correcting the way the Windows Update Orchestrator\n Service handles file operations. (CVE-2020-1313)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists when\n Microsoft Windows fails to properly handle cabinet\n files. (CVE-2020-1300)\n\n - An elevation of privilege (user to user) vulnerability\n exists in Windows Security Health Service when handling\n certain objects in memory. (CVE-2020-1162,\n CVE-2020-1324)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Windows Runtime improperly handles objects in memory. An\n attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability\n could run arbitrary code in an elevated context. An\n attacker could exploit this vulnerability by running a\n specially crafted application on the victim system. The\n update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the way\n the Windows Runtime handles objects in memory.\n (CVE-2020-1231, CVE-2020-1233, CVE-2020-1235,\n CVE-2020-1282, CVE-2020-1304, CVE-2020-1306,\n CVE-2020-1334)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Microsoft Store Runtime improperly handles memory.\n (CVE-2020-1222, CVE-2020-1309)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way\n that Microsoft browsers access objects in memory. The\n vulnerability could corrupt memory in a way that could\n allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code in the\n context of the current user. An attacker who\n successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the\n same user rights as the current user. (CVE-2020-1219)\n\n - A denial of service vulnerability exists when Windows\n Registry improperly handles filesystem operations. An\n attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability\n could cause a denial of service against a system.\n (CVE-2020-1194)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists in\n Microsoft Windows that could allow remote code execution\n if a .LNK file is processed. An attacker who\n successfully exploited this vulnerability could gain the\n same user rights as the local user. (CVE-2020-1299)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the\n Microsoft Windows Graphics Component improperly handles\n objects in memory. An attacker who successfully\n exploited the vulnerability could obtain information to\n further compromise the users system. (CVE-2020-1160)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Windows State Repository Service improperly handles\n objects in memory. An attacker who successfully\n exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code in\n an elevated context. An attacker could exploit this\n vulnerability by running a specially crafted application\n on the victim system. The update addresses the\n vulnerability by correcting the way the Windows State\n Repository Service handles objects in memory.\n (CVE-2020-1305)\n\n - A security feature bypass vulnerability exists when\n Windows Host Guardian Service improperly handles hashes\n recorded and logged. An attacker who successfully\n exploited the vulnerability could tamper with the log\n file. In an attack scenario, an attacker can change\n existing event log types to a type the parsers do not\n interpret allowing an attacker to append their own hash\n without triggering an alert. The update addresses the\n vulnerability by correcting how Windows Host Guardian\n Service handles logging of the measured boot hash.\n (CVE-2020-1259)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way that the Windows Network List Service handles\n objects in memory. An attacker who successfully\n exploited the vulnerability could execute code with\n elevated permissions. (CVE-2020-1209)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way\n that the Microsoft Server Message Block 1.0 (SMBv1)\n server handles certain requests. An attacker who\n successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the\n ability to execute code on the target server.\n (CVE-2020-1301)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in\n Windows Installer because of the way Windows Installer\n handles certain filesystem operations. (CVE-2020-1277,\n CVE-2020-1302, CVE-2020-1312)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the\n way that Microsoft Edge handles cross-origin requests.\n An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could determine the origin of all webpages\n in the affected browser. (CVE-2020-1242)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when an\n OLE Automation component improperly handles memory.\n (CVE-2020-1212)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when\n Group Policy improperly checks access. An attacker who\n successfully exploited this vulnerability could run\n processes in an elevated context. (CVE-2020-1317)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when\n Windows Lockscreen fails to properly load spotlight\n images from a secure location. An attacker who\n successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute\n commands with elevated permissions. An authenticated\n attacker could modify a registry value to exploit this\n vulnerability. The security update addresses the\n vulnerability by ensuring that the spotlight images are\n always loaded from a secure location. (CVE-2020-1279)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in\n OpenSSH for Windows when it does not properly restrict\n access to configuration settings. An attacker who\n successfully exploited this vulnerability could replace\n the shell with a malicious binary. (CVE-2020-1292)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way that the printconfig.dll handles objects in memory.\n An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability\n could execute code with elevated permissions.\n (CVE-2020-1196)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way that the Windows Graphics Device Interface (GDI)\n handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully\n exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code in\n kernel mode. An attacker could then install programs;\n view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts\n with full user rights. (CVE-2020-0915, CVE-2020-0916)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when\n Windows Modules Installer Service improperly handles\n class object members. A locally authenticated attacker\n could run arbitrary code with elevated system\n privileges. An attacker could then install programs;\n view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts\n with full user rights. The update addresses the\n vulnerability by correcting how Windows handles calls to\n preclude unintended elevation. (CVE-2020-1254)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when\n Component Object Model (COM) client uses special case\n IIDs. An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could run arbitrary code with elevated\n system privileges. An attacker could then install\n programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new\n accounts with full user rights. (CVE-2020-1311)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way that the Windows Kernel handles objects in memory.\n An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability\n could execute code with elevated permissions.\n (CVE-2020-1237)\n\n - A denial of service vulnerability exists in the way that\n the Microsoft Server Message Block 3.1.1 (SMBv3)\n protocol handles certain requests. An authenticated\n attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability\n against an SMB Server could cause the affected system to\n crash. An unauthenticated attacker could also exploit\n this this vulnerability against an SMB client and cause\n the affected system to crash. (CVE-2020-1284)\n\n - A denial of service vulnerability exists when Windows\n improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who\n successfully exploited the vulnerability could cause a\n target system to stop responding. (CVE-2020-1283)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when\n Windows Error Reporting improperly handles objects in\n memory. (CVE-2020-1234)\n\n - A spoofing vulnerability exists when theMicrosoft Edge\n (Chromium-based) in IE Mode improperly handles specific\n redirects. An attacker who successfully exploits the IE\n Mode vulnerability could trick a user into believing\n that the user was on a legitimate website. The specially\n crafted website could either spoof content or serve as a\n pivot to chain an attack with other vulnerabilities in\n web services. (CVE-2020-1220)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists when\n Media Foundation improperly handles objects in memory.\n An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could obtain information to further\n compromise the users system. (CVE-2020-1232)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the\n Windows Shell does not properly validate file paths. An\n attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability\n could run arbitrary code in the context of the current\n user. If the current user is logged on as an\n administrator, an attacker could take control of the\n affected system. An attacker could then install\n programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new\n accounts with elevated privileges. Users whose accounts\n are configured to have fewer privileges on the system\n could be less impacted than users who operate with\n administrative privileges. (CVE-2020-1286)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in\n Windows when the Windows kernel-mode driver fails to\n properly handle objects in memory. An attacker who\n successfully exploited this vulnerability could run\n arbitrary code in kernel mode. An attacker could then\n install programs; view, change, or delete data; or\n create new accounts with full user rights.\n (CVE-2020-1207, CVE-2020-1247, CVE-2020-1251,\n CVE-2020-1253)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in\n Windows Text Service Framework (TSF) when the TSF server\n fails to properly handle messages sent from TSF clients.\n An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could run arbitrary code in a privileged\n process. An attacker could then install programs; view,\n change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full\n user rights. (CVE-2020-1314)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when\n DirectX improperly handles objects in memory. An\n attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability\n could run arbitrary code in kernel mode. An attacker\n could then install programs; view, change, or delete\n data; or create new accounts with full user rights.\n (CVE-2020-1258)", "edition": 9, "cvss3": {"score": 7.8, "vector": "AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H"}, "published": "2020-06-10T00:00:00", "title": "KB4557957: Windows 10 Version 2004 June 2020 Security Update", "type": "nessus", "bulletinFamily": "scanner", "cvelist": ["CVE-2020-1244", "CVE-2020-1253", "CVE-2020-1203", "CVE-2020-1277", "CVE-2020-1207", "CVE-2020-1275", "CVE-2020-1287", "CVE-2020-1237", "CVE-2020-1272", "CVE-2020-1300", "CVE-2020-1276", "CVE-2020-0916", "CVE-2020-1235", "CVE-2020-1290", "CVE-2020-1220", "CVE-2020-1278", "CVE-2020-1263", "CVE-2020-1251", "CVE-2020-1274", "CVE-2020-1301", "CVE-2020-1254", "CVE-2020-1212", "CVE-2020-1280", "CVE-2020-1211", "CVE-2020-1279", "CVE-2020-1273", "CVE-2020-1213", "CVE-2020-1219", "CVE-2020-1284", "CVE-2020-1120", "CVE-2020-1306", "CVE-2020-1305", "CVE-2020-1160", "CVE-2020-1236", "CVE-2020-1266", "CVE-2020-1311", "CVE-2020-1258", "CVE-2020-1317", "CVE-2020-1334", "CVE-2020-1307", "CVE-2020-1259", "CVE-2020-1257", "CVE-2020-0986", "CVE-2020-1262", "CVE-2020-1215", "CVE-2020-1209", "CVE-2020-1199", "CVE-2020-1231", "CVE-2020-1281", "CVE-2020-1313", "CVE-2020-1255", "CVE-2020-1232", "CVE-2020-1299", "CVE-2020-1302", "CVE-2020-1296", "CVE-2020-1222", "CVE-2020-1241", "CVE-2020-1216", "CVE-2020-1292", "CVE-2020-1234", "CVE-2020-1247", "CVE-2020-1304", "CVE-2020-1324", "CVE-2020-1312", "CVE-2020-1271", "CVE-2020-1246", "CVE-2020-1261", "CVE-2020-1348", "CVE-2020-1314", "CVE-2020-1282", "CVE-2020-1208", "CVE-2020-1204", "CVE-2020-1239", "CVE-2020-1214", "CVE-2020-1269", "CVE-2020-1233", "CVE-2020-1194", "CVE-2020-0915", "CVE-2020-1268", "CVE-2020-1162", "CVE-2020-1316", "CVE-2020-1294", "CVE-2020-1293", "CVE-2020-1238", "CVE-2020-1286", "CVE-2020-1242", "CVE-2020-1206", "CVE-2020-1264", "CVE-2020-1196", "CVE-2020-1309", "CVE-2020-1315", "CVE-2020-1230", "CVE-2020-1201", "CVE-2020-1270", "CVE-2020-1248", "CVE-2020-1202", "CVE-2020-1291", "CVE-2020-1217", "CVE-2020-1197", "CVE-2020-1283"], "modified": "2020-06-10T00:00:00", "cpe": ["cpe:/o:microsoft:windows", "cpe:/a:microsoft:edge"], "id": "SMB_NT_MS20_JUN_4557957.NASL", "href": "https://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/137304", "sourceData": "#\n# (C) Tenable Network Security, Inc.\n#\n# The descriptive text and package checks in this plugin were \n# extracted from the Microsoft Security Updates API. The text\n# itself is copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation.\n#\n\ninclude('compat.inc');\n\nif (description)\n{\n script_id(137304);\n script_version(\"1.10\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"plugin_modification_date\", value:\"2020/10/13\");\n\n script_cve_id(\n \"CVE-2020-0915\",\n \"CVE-2020-0916\",\n \"CVE-2020-0986\",\n \"CVE-2020-1120\",\n \"CVE-2020-1160\",\n \"CVE-2020-1162\",\n \"CVE-2020-1194\",\n \"CVE-2020-1196\",\n \"CVE-2020-1197\",\n \"CVE-2020-1199\",\n \"CVE-2020-1201\",\n \"CVE-2020-1202\",\n \"CVE-2020-1203\",\n \"CVE-2020-1204\",\n \"CVE-2020-1206\",\n \"CVE-2020-1207\",\n \"CVE-2020-1208\",\n \"CVE-2020-1209\",\n \"CVE-2020-1211\",\n \"CVE-2020-1212\",\n \"CVE-2020-1213\",\n \"CVE-2020-1214\",\n \"CVE-2020-1215\",\n \"CVE-2020-1216\",\n \"CVE-2020-1217\",\n \"CVE-2020-1219\",\n \"CVE-2020-1220\",\n \"CVE-2020-1222\",\n \"CVE-2020-1230\",\n \"CVE-2020-1231\",\n \"CVE-2020-1232\",\n \"CVE-2020-1233\",\n \"CVE-2020-1234\",\n \"CVE-2020-1235\",\n \"CVE-2020-1236\",\n \"CVE-2020-1237\",\n \"CVE-2020-1238\",\n \"CVE-2020-1239\",\n \"CVE-2020-1241\",\n \"CVE-2020-1242\",\n \"CVE-2020-1244\",\n \"CVE-2020-1246\",\n \"CVE-2020-1247\",\n \"CVE-2020-1248\",\n \"CVE-2020-1251\",\n \"CVE-2020-1253\",\n \"CVE-2020-1254\",\n \"CVE-2020-1255\",\n \"CVE-2020-1257\",\n \"CVE-2020-1258\",\n \"CVE-2020-1259\",\n \"CVE-2020-1261\",\n \"CVE-2020-1262\",\n \"CVE-2020-1263\",\n \"CVE-2020-1264\",\n \"CVE-2020-1266\",\n \"CVE-2020-1268\",\n \"CVE-2020-1269\",\n \"CVE-2020-1270\",\n \"CVE-2020-1271\",\n \"CVE-2020-1272\",\n \"CVE-2020-1273\",\n \"CVE-2020-1274\",\n \"CVE-2020-1275\",\n \"CVE-2020-1276\",\n \"CVE-2020-1277\",\n \"CVE-2020-1278\",\n \"CVE-2020-1279\",\n \"CVE-2020-1280\",\n \"CVE-2020-1281\",\n \"CVE-2020-1282\",\n \"CVE-2020-1283\",\n \"CVE-2020-1284\",\n \"CVE-2020-1286\",\n \"CVE-2020-1287\",\n \"CVE-2020-1290\",\n \"CVE-2020-1291\",\n \"CVE-2020-1292\",\n \"CVE-2020-1293\",\n \"CVE-2020-1294\",\n \"CVE-2020-1296\",\n \"CVE-2020-1299\",\n \"CVE-2020-1300\",\n \"CVE-2020-1301\",\n \"CVE-2020-1302\",\n \"CVE-2020-1304\",\n \"CVE-2020-1305\",\n \"CVE-2020-1306\",\n \"CVE-2020-1307\",\n \"CVE-2020-1309\",\n \"CVE-2020-1311\",\n \"CVE-2020-1312\",\n \"CVE-2020-1313\",\n \"CVE-2020-1314\",\n \"CVE-2020-1315\",\n \"CVE-2020-1316\",\n \"CVE-2020-1317\",\n \"CVE-2020-1324\",\n \"CVE-2020-1334\",\n \"CVE-2020-1348\"\n );\n script_xref(name:\"MSKB\", value:\"4557957\");\n script_xref(name:\"MSFT\", value:\"MS20-4557957\");\n script_xref(name:\"IAVA\", value:\"2020-A-0247-S\");\n script_xref(name:\"IAVA\", value:\"2020-A-0256-S\");\n\n script_name(english:\"KB4557957: Windows 10 Version 2004 June 2020 Security Update\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"synopsis\", value:\n\"The remote Windows host is affected by multiple vulnerabilities.\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"description\", value:\n\"The remote Windows host is missing security update 4557957.\nIt is, therefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities :\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way that the wlansvc.dll handles objects in memory. An\n attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability\n could execute code with elevated permissions.\n (CVE-2020-1270)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Windows kernel fails to properly handle objects in\n memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could run arbitrary code in kernel mode.\n An attacker could then install programs; view, change,\n or delete data; or create new accounts with full user\n rights. (CVE-2020-0986, CVE-2020-1246, CVE-2020-1262,\n CVE-2020-1264, CVE-2020-1266, CVE-2020-1269,\n CVE-2020-1273, CVE-2020-1274, CVE-2020-1275,\n CVE-2020-1276, CVE-2020-1307, CVE-2020-1316)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the\n Windows GDI component improperly discloses the contents\n of its memory. An attacker who successfully exploited\n the vulnerability could obtain information to further\n compromise the users system. There are multiple ways an\n attacker could exploit the vulnerability, such as by\n convincing a user to open a specially crafted document,\n or by convincing a user to visit an untrusted webpage.\n The security update addresses the vulnerability by\n correcting how the Windows GDI component handles objects\n in memory. (CVE-2020-1348)\n\n - A vulnerability exists in the way the Windows\n Diagnostics & feedback settings app handles objects\n in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could cause additional diagnostic data\n from the affected device to be sent to Microsoft.\n (CVE-2020-1296)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way\n that the VBScript engine handles objects in memory. The\n vulnerability could corrupt memory in such a way that an\n attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of\n the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited\n the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the\n current user. (CVE-2020-1213, CVE-2020-1214,\n CVE-2020-1215, CVE-2020-1216, CVE-2020-1230)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the\n win32k component improperly provides kernel information.\n An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability\n could obtain information to further compromise the users\n system. (CVE-2020-1290)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists when\n Microsoft Windows OLE fails to properly validate user\n input. An attacker could exploit the vulnerability to\n execute malicious code. (CVE-2020-1281)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the\n way Windows Error Reporting (WER) handles objects in\n memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could obtain information to further\n compromise the users system. (CVE-2020-1261,\n CVE-2020-1263)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Windows Background Intelligent Transfer Service (BITS)\n IIS module improperly handles uploaded content. An\n attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability\n could upload restricted file types to an IIS-hosted\n folder. (CVE-2020-1255)\n\n - A denial of service vulnerability exists when Connected\n User Experiences and Telemetry Service improperly\n handles file operations. An attacker who successfully\n exploited this vulnerability could cause a system to\n stop responding. (CVE-2020-1120, CVE-2020-1244)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when\n Windows Error Reporting manager improperly handles a\n process crash. An attacker who successfully exploited\n this vulnerability could delete a targeted file leading\n to an elevated status. (CVE-2020-1197)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way that the Windows Network Connections Service handles\n objects in memory. An attacker who successfully\n exploited the vulnerability could execute code with\n elevated permissions. (CVE-2020-1291)\n\n - A memory corruption vulnerability exists when Windows\n Media Foundation improperly handles objects in memory.\n An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability\n could install programs; view, change, or delete data; or\n create new accounts with full user rights. There are\n multiple ways an attacker could exploit the\n vulnerability, such as by convincing a user to open a\n specially crafted document, or by convincing a user to\n visit a malicious webpage. The security update addresses\n the vulnerability by correcting how Windows Media\n Foundation handles objects in memory. (CVE-2020-1238,\n CVE-2020-1239)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Windows Feedback Hub improperly handles objects in\n memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could run processes in an elevated\n context. (CVE-2020-1199)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the\n way that the Microsoft Server Message Block 3.1.1\n (SMBv3) protocol handles certain requests. An attacker\n who successfully exploited the vulnerability could\n obtain information to further compromise the users\n system. (CVE-2020-1206)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Diagnostics Hub Standard Collector or the Visual Studio\n Standard Collector fail to properly handle objects in\n memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could run processes in an elevated\n context. (CVE-2020-1202, CVE-2020-1203)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when\n Windows Mobile Device Management (MDM) Diagnostics\n improperly handles junctions. An attacker who\n successfully exploited this vulnerability could bypass\n access restrictions to delete files. (CVE-2020-1204)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way the Windows Now Playing Session Manager handles\n objects in memory. An attacker who successfully\n exploited this vulnerability could run processes in an\n elevated context. An attacker could then install\n programs; view, change or delete data. (CVE-2020-1201)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Windows Backup Service improperly handles file\n operations. (CVE-2020-1271)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the\n Windows Jet Database Engine improperly handles objects\n in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could execute arbitrary code on a victim\n system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by\n enticing a victim to open a specially crafted file. The\n update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the way\n the Windows Jet Database Engine handles objects in\n memory. (CVE-2020-1208, CVE-2020-1236)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way that the Connected Devices Platform Service handles\n objects in memory. An attacker who successfully\n exploited the vulnerability could execute code with\n elevated permissions. (CVE-2020-1211)\n\n - A security feature bypass vulnerability exists when\n Windows Kernel fails to properly sanitize certain\n parameters. (CVE-2020-1241)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Diagnostics Hub Standard Collector Service improperly\n handles file operations. An attacker who successfully\n exploited this vulnerability could gain elevated\n privileges. An attacker with unprivileged access to a\n vulnerable system could exploit this vulnerability. The\n security update addresses the vulnerability by ensuring\n the Diagnostics Hub Standard Collector Service properly\n handles file operations. (CVE-2020-1257, CVE-2020-1278,\n CVE-2020-1293)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way that the Windows Bluetooth Service handles objects\n in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the\n vulnerability could execute code with elevated\n permissions. (CVE-2020-1280)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way\n that the Windows Graphics Device Interface (GDI) handles\n objects in the memory. An attacker who successfully\n exploited this vulnerability could take control of the\n affected system. An attacker could then install\n programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new\n accounts with full user rights. (CVE-2020-1248)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n Windows Installer when the Windows Installer fails to\n properly sanitize input leading to an insecure library\n loading behavior. A locally authenticated attacker could\n run arbitrary code with elevated system privileges. An\n attacker could then install programs; view, change, or\n delete data; or create new accounts with full user\n rights. The security update addresses the vulnerability\n by correcting the input sanitization error to preclude\n unintended elevation. (CVE-2020-1272)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the\n Windows Runtime improperly handles objects in memory. An\n attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability\n could read memory that was freed and might run arbitrary\n code in an elevated context. An attacker could exploit\n this vulnerability by running a specially crafted\n application on the victim system. The update addresses\n the vulnerability by correcting the way the Windows\n Runtime handles objects in memory. (CVE-2020-1217)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists when\n Internet Explorer improperly handles objects in memory.\n An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability\n could obtain information to further compromise the users\n system. (CVE-2020-1315)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way that the Windows WalletService handles objects in\n memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the\n vulnerability could execute code with elevated\n permissions. (CVE-2020-1287, CVE-2020-1294)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists when a\n Windows service improperly handles objects in memory. An\n attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability\n could obtain information to further compromise the users\n system. (CVE-2020-1268)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Windows Update Orchestrator Service improperly handles\n file operations. An attacker who successfully exploited\n this vulnerability could run processes in an elevated\n context. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by\n running a specially crafted application on the victim\n system. The update addresses the vulnerability by\n correcting the way the Windows Update Orchestrator\n Service handles file operations. (CVE-2020-1313)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists when\n Microsoft Windows fails to properly handle cabinet\n files. (CVE-2020-1300)\n\n - An elevation of privilege (user to user) vulnerability\n exists in Windows Security Health Service when handling\n certain objects in memory. (CVE-2020-1162,\n CVE-2020-1324)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Windows Runtime improperly handles objects in memory. An\n attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability\n could run arbitrary code in an elevated context. An\n attacker could exploit this vulnerability by running a\n specially crafted application on the victim system. The\n update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the way\n the Windows Runtime handles objects in memory.\n (CVE-2020-1231, CVE-2020-1233, CVE-2020-1235,\n CVE-2020-1282, CVE-2020-1304, CVE-2020-1306,\n CVE-2020-1334)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Microsoft Store Runtime improperly handles memory.\n (CVE-2020-1222, CVE-2020-1309)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way\n that Microsoft browsers access objects in memory. The\n vulnerability could corrupt memory in a way that could\n allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code in the\n context of the current user. An attacker who\n successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the\n same user rights as the current user. (CVE-2020-1219)\n\n - A denial of service vulnerability exists when Windows\n Registry improperly handles filesystem operations. An\n attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability\n could cause a denial of service against a system.\n (CVE-2020-1194)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists in\n Microsoft Windows that could allow remote code execution\n if a .LNK file is processed. An attacker who\n successfully exploited this vulnerability could gain the\n same user rights as the local user. (CVE-2020-1299)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the\n Microsoft Windows Graphics Component improperly handles\n objects in memory. An attacker who successfully\n exploited the vulnerability could obtain information to\n further compromise the users system. (CVE-2020-1160)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Windows State Repository Service improperly handles\n objects in memory. An attacker who successfully\n exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code in\n an elevated context. An attacker could exploit this\n vulnerability by running a specially crafted application\n on the victim system. The update addresses the\n vulnerability by correcting the way the Windows State\n Repository Service handles objects in memory.\n (CVE-2020-1305)\n\n - A security feature bypass vulnerability exists when\n Windows Host Guardian Service improperly handles hashes\n recorded and logged. An attacker who successfully\n exploited the vulnerability could tamper with the log\n file. In an attack scenario, an attacker can change\n existing event log types to a type the parsers do not\n interpret allowing an attacker to append their own hash\n without triggering an alert. The update addresses the\n vulnerability by correcting how Windows Host Guardian\n Service handles logging of the measured boot hash.\n (CVE-2020-1259)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way that the Windows Network List Service handles\n objects in memory. An attacker who successfully\n exploited the vulnerability could execute code with\n elevated permissions. (CVE-2020-1209)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way\n that the Microsoft Server Message Block 1.0 (SMBv1)\n server handles certain requests. An attacker who\n successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the\n ability to execute code on the target server.\n (CVE-2020-1301)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in\n Windows Installer because of the way Windows Installer\n handles certain filesystem operations. (CVE-2020-1277,\n CVE-2020-1302, CVE-2020-1312)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the\n way that Microsoft Edge handles cross-origin requests.\n An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could determine the origin of all webpages\n in the affected browser. (CVE-2020-1242)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when an\n OLE Automation component improperly handles memory.\n (CVE-2020-1212)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when\n Group Policy improperly checks access. An attacker who\n successfully exploited this vulnerability could run\n processes in an elevated context. (CVE-2020-1317)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when\n Windows Lockscreen fails to properly load spotlight\n images from a secure location. An attacker who\n successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute\n commands with elevated permissions. An authenticated\n attacker could modify a registry value to exploit this\n vulnerability. The security update addresses the\n vulnerability by ensuring that the spotlight images are\n always loaded from a secure location. (CVE-2020-1279)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in\n OpenSSH for Windows when it does not properly restrict\n access to configuration settings. An attacker who\n successfully exploited this vulnerability could replace\n the shell with a malicious binary. (CVE-2020-1292)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way that the printconfig.dll handles objects in memory.\n An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability\n could execute code with elevated permissions.\n (CVE-2020-1196)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way that the Windows Graphics Device Interface (GDI)\n handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully\n exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code in\n kernel mode. An attacker could then install programs;\n view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts\n with full user rights. (CVE-2020-0915, CVE-2020-0916)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when\n Windows Modules Installer Service improperly handles\n class object members. A locally authenticated attacker\n could run arbitrary code with elevated system\n privileges. An attacker could then install programs;\n view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts\n with full user rights. The update addresses the\n vulnerability by correcting how Windows handles calls to\n preclude unintended elevation. (CVE-2020-1254)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when\n Component Object Model (COM) client uses special case\n IIDs. An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could run arbitrary code with elevated\n system privileges. An attacker could then install\n programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new\n accounts with full user rights. (CVE-2020-1311)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way that the Windows Kernel handles objects in memory.\n An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability\n could execute code with elevated permissions.\n (CVE-2020-1237)\n\n - A denial of service vulnerability exists in the way that\n the Microsoft Server Message Block 3.1.1 (SMBv3)\n protocol handles certain requests. An authenticated\n attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability\n against an SMB Server could cause the affected system to\n crash. An unauthenticated attacker could also exploit\n this this vulnerability against an SMB client and cause\n the affected system to crash. (CVE-2020-1284)\n\n - A denial of service vulnerability exists when Windows\n improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who\n successfully exploited the vulnerability could cause a\n target system to stop responding. (CVE-2020-1283)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when\n Windows Error Reporting improperly handles objects in\n memory. (CVE-2020-1234)\n\n - A spoofing vulnerability exists when theMicrosoft Edge\n (Chromium-based) in IE Mode improperly handles specific\n redirects. An attacker who successfully exploits the IE\n Mode vulnerability could trick a user into believing\n that the user was on a legitimate website. The specially\n crafted website could either spoof content or serve as a\n pivot to chain an attack with other vulnerabilities in\n web services. (CVE-2020-1220)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists when\n Media Foundation improperly handles objects in memory.\n An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could obtain information to further\n compromise the users system. (CVE-2020-1232)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the\n Windows Shell does not properly validate file paths. An\n attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability\n could run arbitrary code in the context of the current\n user. If the current user is logged on as an\n administrator, an attacker could take control of the\n affected system. An attacker could then install\n programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new\n accounts with elevated privileges. Users whose accounts\n are configured to have fewer privileges on the system\n could be less impacted than users who operate with\n administrative privileges. (CVE-2020-1286)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in\n Windows when the Windows kernel-mode driver fails to\n properly handle objects in memory. An attacker who\n successfully exploited this vulnerability could run\n arbitrary code in kernel mode. An attacker could then\n install programs; view, change, or delete data; or\n create new accounts with full user rights.\n (CVE-2020-1207, CVE-2020-1247, CVE-2020-1251,\n CVE-2020-1253)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in\n Windows Text Service Framework (TSF) when the TSF server\n fails to properly handle messages sent from TSF clients.\n An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could run arbitrary code in a privileged\n process. An attacker could then install programs; view,\n change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full\n user rights. (CVE-2020-1314)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when\n DirectX improperly handles objects in memory. An\n attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability\n could run arbitrary code in kernel mode. An attacker\n could then install programs; view, change, or delete\n data; or create new accounts with full user rights.\n (CVE-2020-1258)\");\n # https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/4557957/windows-10-update-kb4557957\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"see_also\", value:\"http://www.nessus.org/u?e4706967\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"solution\", value:\n\"Apply Cumulative Update KB4557957.\");\n script_set_cvss_base_vector(\"CVSS2#AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C\");\n script_set_cvss_temporal_vector(\"CVSS2#E:H/RL:OF/RC:C\");\n script_set_cvss3_base_vector(\"CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\");\n script_set_cvss3_temporal_vector(\"CVSS:3.0/E:H/RL:O/RC:C\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"cvss_score_source\", value:\"CVE-2020-1307\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploitability_ease\", value:\"Exploits are available\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploit_available\", value:\"true\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploited_by_malware\", value:\"true\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"metasploit_name\", value:'Windows Update Orchestrator unchecked ScheduleWork call');\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploit_framework_metasploit\", value:\"true\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"vuln_publication_date\", value:\"2020/06/10\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"patch_publication_date\", value:\"2020/06/10\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"plugin_publication_date\", value:\"2020/06/10\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"plugin_type\", value:\"local\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"cpe\", value:\"cpe:/o:microsoft:windows\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"cpe\", value:\"cpe:/a:microsoft:edge\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"stig_severity\", value:\"I\");\n script_end_attributes();\n\n script_category(ACT_GATHER_INFO);\n script_family(english:\"Windows : Microsoft Bulletins\");\n\n script_copyright(english:\"This script is Copyright (C) 2020 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.\");\n\n script_dependencies(\"smb_check_rollup.nasl\", \"smb_hotfixes.nasl\", \"ms_bulletin_checks_possible.nasl\");\n script_require_keys(\"SMB/MS_Bulletin_Checks/Possible\");\n script_require_ports(139, 445, \"Host/patch_management_checks\");\n\n exit(0);\n}\n\ninclude(\"audit.inc\");\ninclude(\"smb_hotfixes_fcheck.inc\");\ninclude(\"smb_hotfixes.inc\");\ninclude(\"smb_func.inc\");\ninclude(\"misc_func.inc\");\n\nget_kb_item_or_exit(\"SMB/MS_Bulletin_Checks/Possible\");\n\nbulletin = \"MS20-06\";\nkbs = make_list('4557957');\n\nif (get_kb_item(\"Host/patch_management_checks\")) hotfix_check_3rd_party(bulletin:bulletin, kbs:kbs, severity:SECURITY_HOLE);\n\nget_kb_item_or_exit(\"SMB/Registry/Enumerated\");\nget_kb_item_or_exit(\"SMB/WindowsVersion\", exit_code:1);\n\nif (hotfix_check_sp_range(win10:'0') <= 0) audit(AUDIT_OS_SP_NOT_VULN);\n\nshare = hotfix_get_systemdrive(as_share:TRUE, exit_on_fail:TRUE);\nif (!is_accessible_share(share:share)) audit(AUDIT_SHARE_FAIL, share);\n\nif (\n smb_check_rollup(os:\"10\",\n sp:0,\n os_build:\"19041\",\n rollup_date:\"06_2020\",\n bulletin:bulletin,\n rollup_kb_list:[4557957])\n)\n{\n replace_kb_item(name:'SMB/Missing/'+bulletin, value:TRUE);\n hotfix_security_hole();\n hotfix_check_fversion_end();\n exit(0);\n}\nelse\n{\n hotfix_check_fversion_end();\n audit(AUDIT_HOST_NOT, hotfix_get_audit_report());\n}\n\n", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2020-10-14T09:41:16", "description": "The remote Windows host is missing security update 4560960. It is, \ntherefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities :\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way that the wlansvc.dll handles objects in memory. An\n attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability\n could execute code with elevated permissions.\n (CVE-2020-1270)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Windows kernel fails to properly handle objects in\n memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could run arbitrary code in kernel mode.\n An attacker could then install programs; view, change,\n or delete data; or create new accounts with full user\n rights. (CVE-2020-0986, CVE-2020-1246, CVE-2020-1262,\n CVE-2020-1264, CVE-2020-1266, CVE-2020-1269,\n CVE-2020-1273, CVE-2020-1274, CVE-2020-1275,\n CVE-2020-1276, CVE-2020-1307, CVE-2020-1316)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the\n Windows GDI component improperly discloses the contents\n of its memory. An attacker who successfully exploited\n the vulnerability could obtain information to further\n compromise the users system. There are multiple ways an\n attacker could exploit the vulnerability, such as by\n convincing a user to open a specially crafted document,\n or by convincing a user to visit an untrusted webpage.\n The security update addresses the vulnerability by\n correcting how the Windows GDI component handles objects\n in memory. (CVE-2020-1348)\n\n - A vulnerability exists in the way the Windows\n Diagnostics & feedback settings app handles objects\n in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could cause additional diagnostic data\n from the affected device to be sent to Microsoft.\n (CVE-2020-1296)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way that the Windows WalletService handles objects in\n memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the\n vulnerability could execute code with elevated\n permissions. (CVE-2020-1287)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the\n win32k component improperly provides kernel information.\n An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability\n could obtain information to further compromise the users\n system. (CVE-2020-1290)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists when\n Microsoft Windows OLE fails to properly validate user\n input. An attacker could exploit the vulnerability to\n execute malicious code. (CVE-2020-1281)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the\n way Windows Error Reporting (WER) handles objects in\n memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could obtain information to further\n compromise the users system. (CVE-2020-1261,\n CVE-2020-1263)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Windows Background Intelligent Transfer Service (BITS)\n IIS module improperly handles uploaded content. An\n attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability\n could upload restricted file types to an IIS-hosted\n folder. (CVE-2020-1255)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when\n Windows Error Reporting manager improperly handles a\n process crash. An attacker who successfully exploited\n this vulnerability could delete a targeted file leading\n to an elevated status. (CVE-2020-1197)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way that the Windows Network Connections Service handles\n objects in memory. An attacker who successfully\n exploited the vulnerability could execute code with\n elevated permissions. (CVE-2020-1291)\n\n - A memory corruption vulnerability exists when Windows\n Media Foundation improperly handles objects in memory.\n An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability\n could install programs; view, change, or delete data; or\n create new accounts with full user rights. There are\n multiple ways an attacker could exploit the\n vulnerability, such as by convincing a user to open a\n specially crafted document, or by convincing a user to\n visit a malicious webpage. The security update addresses\n the vulnerability by correcting how Windows Media\n Foundation handles objects in memory. (CVE-2020-1238,\n CVE-2020-1239)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the\n way that the Microsoft Server Message Block 3.1.1\n (SMBv3) protocol handles certain requests. An attacker\n who successfully exploited the vulnerability could\n obtain information to further compromise the users\n system. (CVE-2020-1206)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Diagnostics Hub Standard Collector or the Visual Studio\n Standard Collector fail to properly handle objects in\n memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could run processes in an elevated\n context. (CVE-2020-1202, CVE-2020-1203)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when\n Windows Mobile Device Management (MDM) Diagnostics\n improperly handles junctions. An attacker who\n successfully exploited this vulnerability could bypass\n access restrictions to delete files. (CVE-2020-1204)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way the Windows Now Playing Session Manager handles\n objects in memory. An attacker who successfully\n exploited this vulnerability could run processes in an\n elevated context. An attacker could then install\n programs; view, change or delete data. (CVE-2020-1201)\n\n - A denial of service vulnerability exists when Windows\n improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who\n successfully exploited the vulnerability could cause a\n target system to stop responding. (CVE-2020-1283)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the\n Windows Jet Database Engine improperly handles objects\n in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could execute arbitrary code on a victim\n system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by\n enticing a victim to open a specially crafted file. The\n update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the way\n the Windows Jet Database Engine handles objects in\n memory. (CVE-2020-1208, CVE-2020-1236)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way that the Connected Devices Platform Service handles\n objects in memory. An attacker who successfully\n exploited the vulnerability could execute code with\n elevated permissions. (CVE-2020-1211)\n\n - A security feature bypass vulnerability exists when\n Windows Kernel fails to properly sanitize certain\n parameters. (CVE-2020-1241)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Diagnostics Hub Standard Collector Service improperly\n handles file operations. An attacker who successfully\n exploited this vulnerability could gain elevated\n privileges. An attacker with unprivileged access to a\n vulnerable system could exploit this vulnerability. The\n security update addresses the vulnerability by ensuring\n the Diagnostics Hub Standard Collector Service properly\n handles file operations. (CVE-2020-1257, CVE-2020-1278,\n CVE-2020-1293)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way that the Windows Bluetooth Service handles objects\n in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the\n vulnerability could execute code with elevated\n permissions. (CVE-2020-1280)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way\n that the Windows Graphics Device Interface (GDI) handles\n objects in the memory. An attacker who successfully\n exploited this vulnerability could take control of the\n affected system. An attacker could then install\n programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new\n accounts with full user rights. (CVE-2020-1248)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n Windows Installer when the Windows Installer fails to\n properly sanitize input leading to an insecure library\n loading behavior. A locally authenticated attacker could\n run arbitrary code with elevated system privileges. An\n attacker could then install programs; view, change, or\n delete data; or create new accounts with full user\n rights. The security update addresses the vulnerability\n by correcting the input sanitization error to preclude\n unintended elevation. (CVE-2020-1272)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the\n Windows Runtime improperly handles objects in memory. An\n attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability\n could read memory that was freed and might run arbitrary\n code in an elevated context. An attacker could exploit\n this vulnerability by running a specially crafted\n application on the victim system. The update addresses\n the vulnerability by correcting the way the Windows\n Runtime handles objects in memory. (CVE-2020-1217)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists when\n Internet Explorer improperly handles objects in memory.\n An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability\n could obtain information to further compromise the users\n system. (CVE-2020-1315)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists in\n Microsoft Windows that could allow remote code execution\n if a .LNK file is processed. An attacker who\n successfully exploited this vulnerability could gain the\n same user rights as the local user. (CVE-2020-1299)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists when a\n Windows service improperly handles objects in memory. An\n attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability\n could obtain information to further compromise the users\n system. (CVE-2020-1268)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Windows Update Orchestrator Service improperly handles\n file operations. An attacker who successfully exploited\n this vulnerability could run processes in an elevated\n context. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by\n running a specially crafted application on the victim\n system. The update addresses the vulnerability by\n correcting the way the Windows Update Orchestrator\n Service handles file operations. (CVE-2020-1313)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists when\n Microsoft Windows fails to properly handle cabinet\n files. (CVE-2020-1300)\n\n - An elevation of privilege (user to user) vulnerability\n exists in Windows Security Health Service when handling\n certain objects in memory. (CVE-2020-1162,\n CVE-2020-1324)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way\n that the VBScript engine handles objects in memory. The\n vulnerability could corrupt memory in such a way that an\n attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of\n the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited\n the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the\n current user. (CVE-2020-1213, CVE-2020-1214,\n CVE-2020-1215, CVE-2020-1216, CVE-2020-1230,\n CVE-2020-1260)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Microsoft Store Runtime improperly handles memory.\n (CVE-2020-1222, CVE-2020-1309)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way\n that Microsoft browsers access objects in memory. The\n vulnerability could corrupt memory in a way that could\n allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code in the\n context of the current user. An attacker who\n successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the\n same user rights as the current user. (CVE-2020-1219)\n\n - A denial of service vulnerability exists when Windows\n Registry improperly handles filesystem operations. An\n attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability\n could cause a denial of service against a system.\n (CVE-2020-1194)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Windows Runtime improperly handles objects in memory. An\n attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability\n could run arbitrary code in an elevated context. An\n attacker could exploit this vulnerability by running a\n specially crafted application on the victim system. The\n update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the way\n the Windows Runtime handles objects in memory.\n (CVE-2020-1231, CVE-2020-1233, CVE-2020-1235,\n CVE-2020-1265, CVE-2020-1282, CVE-2020-1304,\n CVE-2020-1306, CVE-2020-1334)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the\n Microsoft Windows Graphics Component improperly handles\n objects in memory. An attacker who successfully\n exploited the vulnerability could obtain information to\n further compromise the users system. (CVE-2020-1160)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way\n that the ChakraCore scripting engine handles objects in\n memory. The vulnerability could corrupt memory in such a\n way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the\n context of the current user. An attacker who\n successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the\n same user rights as the current user. (CVE-2020-1073)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Windows State Repository Service improperly handles\n objects in memory. An attacker who successfully\n exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code in\n an elevated context. An attacker could exploit this\n vulnerability by running a specially crafted application\n on the victim system. The update addresses the\n vulnerability by correcting the way the Windows State\n Repository Service handles objects in memory.\n (CVE-2020-1305)\n\n - A security feature bypass vulnerability exists when\n Windows Host Guardian Service improperly handles hashes\n recorded and logged. An attacker who successfully\n exploited the vulnerability could tamper with the log\n file. In an attack scenario, an attacker can change\n existing event log types to a type the parsers do not\n interpret allowing an attacker to append their own hash\n without triggering an alert. The update addresses the\n vulnerability by correcting how Windows Host Guardian\n Service handles logging of the measured boot hash.\n (CVE-2020-1259)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way that the Windows Network List Service handles\n objects in memory. An attacker who successfully\n exploited the vulnerability could execute code with\n elevated permissions. (CVE-2020-1209)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way\n that the Microsoft Server Message Block 1.0 (SMBv1)\n server handles certain requests. An attacker who\n successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the\n ability to execute code on the target server.\n (CVE-2020-1301)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Windows Backup Service improperly handles file\n operations. (CVE-2020-1271)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in\n Windows Installer because of the way Windows Installer\n handles certain filesystem operations. (CVE-2020-1277,\n CVE-2020-1302, CVE-2020-1312)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the\n way that Microsoft Edge handles cross-origin requests.\n An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could determine the origin of all webpages\n in the affected browser. (CVE-2020-1242)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when an\n OLE Automation component improperly handles memory.\n (CVE-2020-1212)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when\n Group Policy improperly checks access. An attacker who\n successfully exploited this vulnerability could run\n processes in an elevated context. (CVE-2020-1317)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when\n Windows Lockscreen fails to properly load spotlight\n images from a secure location. An attacker who\n successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute\n commands with elevated permissions. An authenticated\n attacker could modify a registry value to exploit this\n vulnerability. The security update addresses the\n vulnerability by ensuring that the spotlight images are\n always loaded from a secure location. (CVE-2020-1279)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in\n OpenSSH for Windows when it does not properly restrict\n access to configuration settings. An attacker who\n successfully exploited this vulnerability could replace\n the shell with a malicious binary. (CVE-2020-1292)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way that the printconfig.dll handles objects in memory.\n An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability\n could execute code with elevated permissions.\n (CVE-2020-1196)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way that the Windows Graphics Device Interface (GDI)\n handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully\n exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code in\n kernel mode. An attacker could then install programs;\n view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts\n with full user rights. (CVE-2020-0915, CVE-2020-0916)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when\n Windows Modules Installer Service improperly handles\n class object members. A locally authenticated attacker\n could run arbitrary code with elevated system\n privileges. An attacker could then install programs;\n view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts\n with full user rights. The update addresses the\n vulnerability by correcting how Windows handles calls to\n preclude unintended elevation. (CVE-2020-1254)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when\n Component Object Model (COM) client uses special case\n IIDs. An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could run arbitrary code with elevated\n system privileges. An attacker could then install\n programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new\n accounts with full user rights. (CVE-2020-1311)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in\n Windows when the Windows kernel-mode driver fails to\n properly handle objects in memory. An attacker who\n successfully exploited this vulnerability could run\n arbitrary code in kernel mode. An attacker could then\n install programs; view, change, or delete data; or\n create new accounts with full user rights.\n (CVE-2020-1207, CVE-2020-1247, CVE-2020-1251,\n CVE-2020-1253, CVE-2020-1310)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way that the Windows Kernel handles objects in memory.\n An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability\n could execute code with elevated permissions.\n (CVE-2020-1237)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when\n DirectX improperly handles objects in memory. An\n attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability\n could run arbitrary code in kernel mode. An attacker\n could then install programs; view, change, or delete\n data; or create new accounts with full user rights.\n (CVE-2020-1258)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when\n Windows Error Reporting improperly handles objects in\n memory. (CVE-2020-1234)\n\n - A spoofing vulnerability exists when theMicrosoft Edge\n (Chromium-based) in IE Mode improperly handles specific\n redirects. An attacker who successfully exploits the IE\n Mode vulnerability could trick a user into believing\n that the user was on a legitimate website. The specially\n crafted website could either spoof content or serve as a\n pivot to chain an attack with other vulnerabilities in\n web services. (CVE-2020-1220)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists when\n Media Foundation improperly handles objects in memory.\n An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could obtain information to further\n compromise the users system. (CVE-2020-1232)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the\n Windows Shell does not properly validate file paths. An\n attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability\n could run arbitrary code in the context of the current\n user. If the current user is logged on as an\n administrator, an attacker could take control of the\n affected system. An attacker could then install\n programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new\n accounts with elevated privileges. Users whose accounts\n are configured to have fewer privileges on the system\n could be less impacted than users who operate with\n administrative privileges. (CVE-2020-1286)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in\n Windows Text Service Framework (TSF) when the TSF server\n fails to properly handle messages sent from TSF clients.\n An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could run arbitrary code in a privileged\n process. An attacker could then install programs; view,\n change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full\n user rights. (CVE-2020-1314)\n\n - A denial of service vulnerability exists when Connected\n User Experiences and Telemetry Service improperly\n handles file operations. An attacker who successfully\n exploited this vulnerability could cause a system to\n stop responding. (CVE-2020-1244)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Windows Spatial Data Service improperly handles objects\n in memory. An attacker could exploit the vulnerability\n to overwrite or modify a protected file leading to a\n privilege escalation. (CVE-2020-1441)", "edition": 11, "cvss3": {"score": 7.8, "vector": "AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H"}, "published": "2020-06-09T00:00:00", "title": "KB4560960: Windows 10 Version 1903 and Windows 10 Version 1909 June 2020 Security Update", "type": "nessus", "bulletinFamily": "scanner", "cvelist": ["CVE-2020-1244", "CVE-2020-1253", "CVE-2020-1073", "CVE-2020-1203", "CVE-2020-1277", "CVE-2020-1207", "CVE-2020-1275", "CVE-2020-1287", "CVE-2020-1237", "CVE-2020-1272", "CVE-2020-1300", "CVE-2020-1276", "CVE-2020-0916", "CVE-2020-1235", "CVE-2020-1290", "CVE-2020-1220", "CVE-2020-1278", "CVE-2020-1263", "CVE-2020-1310", "CVE-2020-1251", "CVE-2020-1274", "CVE-2020-1301", "CVE-2020-1254", "CVE-2020-1212", "CVE-2020-1280", "CVE-2020-1211", "CVE-2020-1279", "CVE-2020-1273", "CVE-2020-1213", "CVE-2020-1219", "CVE-2020-1441", "CVE-2020-1306", "CVE-2020-1305", "CVE-2020-1160", "CVE-2020-1236", "CVE-2020-1266", "CVE-2020-1311", "CVE-2020-1258", "CVE-2020-1317", "CVE-2020-1334", "CVE-2020-1307", "CVE-2020-1259", "CVE-2020-1257", "CVE-2020-0986", "CVE-2020-1262", "CVE-2020-1215", "CVE-2020-1209", "CVE-2020-1231", "CVE-2020-1281", "CVE-2020-1313", "CVE-2020-1255", "CVE-2020-1232", "CVE-2020-1299", "CVE-2020-1302", "CVE-2020-1296", "CVE-2020-1222", "CVE-2020-1241", "CVE-2020-1216", "CVE-2020-1292", "CVE-2020-1234", "CVE-2020-1247", "CVE-2020-1304", "CVE-2020-1324", "CVE-2020-1312", "CVE-2020-1271", "CVE-2020-1246", "CVE-2020-1261", "CVE-2020-1348", "CVE-2020-1314", "CVE-2020-1282", "CVE-2020-1208", "CVE-2020-1204", "CVE-2020-1239", "CVE-2020-1214", "CVE-2020-1269", "CVE-2020-1233", "CVE-2020-1194", "CVE-2020-0915", "CVE-2020-1265", "CVE-2020-1268", "CVE-2020-1162", "CVE-2020-1316", "CVE-2020-1293", "CVE-2020-1238", "CVE-2020-1286", "CVE-2020-1242", "CVE-2020-1206", "CVE-2020-1264", "CVE-2020-1196", "CVE-2020-1309", "CVE-2020-1315", "CVE-2020-1230", "CVE-2020-1201", "CVE-2020-1270", "CVE-2020-1248", "CVE-2020-1202", "CVE-2020-1291", "CVE-2020-1260", "CVE-2020-1217", "CVE-2020-1197", "CVE-2020-1283"], "modified": "2020-06-09T00:00:00", "cpe": ["cpe:/o:microsoft:windows", "cpe:/a:microsoft:edge"], "id": "SMB_NT_MS20_JUN_4560960.NASL", "href": "https://www.tenable.com/plugins/nessus/137254", "sourceData": "#\n# (C) Tenable Network Security, Inc.\n#\n# The descriptive text and package checks in this plugin were \n# extracted from the Microsoft Security Updates API. The text\n# itself is copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation.\n#\n\ninclude('compat.inc');\n\nif (description)\n{\n script_id(137254);\n script_version(\"1.13\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"plugin_modification_date\", value:\"2020/10/13\");\n\n script_cve_id(\n \"CVE-2020-0915\",\n \"CVE-2020-0916\",\n \"CVE-2020-0986\",\n \"CVE-2020-1073\",\n \"CVE-2020-1160\",\n \"CVE-2020-1162\",\n \"CVE-2020-1194\",\n \"CVE-2020-1196\",\n \"CVE-2020-1197\",\n \"CVE-2020-1201\",\n \"CVE-2020-1202\",\n \"CVE-2020-1203\",\n \"CVE-2020-1204\",\n \"CVE-2020-1206\",\n \"CVE-2020-1207\",\n \"CVE-2020-1208\",\n \"CVE-2020-1209\",\n \"CVE-2020-1211\",\n \"CVE-2020-1212\",\n \"CVE-2020-1213\",\n \"CVE-2020-1214\",\n \"CVE-2020-1215\",\n \"CVE-2020-1216\",\n \"CVE-2020-1217\",\n \"CVE-2020-1219\",\n \"CVE-2020-1220\",\n \"CVE-2020-1222\",\n \"CVE-2020-1230\",\n \"CVE-2020-1231\",\n \"CVE-2020-1232\",\n \"CVE-2020-1233\",\n \"CVE-2020-1234\",\n \"CVE-2020-1235\",\n \"CVE-2020-1236\",\n \"CVE-2020-1237\",\n \"CVE-2020-1238\",\n \"CVE-2020-1239\",\n \"CVE-2020-1241\",\n \"CVE-2020-1242\",\n \"CVE-2020-1244\",\n \"CVE-2020-1246\",\n \"CVE-2020-1247\",\n \"CVE-2020-1248\",\n \"CVE-2020-1251\",\n \"CVE-2020-1253\",\n \"CVE-2020-1254\",\n \"CVE-2020-1255\",\n \"CVE-2020-1257\",\n \"CVE-2020-1258\",\n \"CVE-2020-1259\",\n \"CVE-2020-1260\",\n \"CVE-2020-1261\",\n \"CVE-2020-1262\",\n \"CVE-2020-1263\",\n \"CVE-2020-1264\",\n \"CVE-2020-1265\",\n \"CVE-2020-1266\",\n \"CVE-2020-1268\",\n \"CVE-2020-1269\",\n \"CVE-2020-1270\",\n \"CVE-2020-1271\",\n \"CVE-2020-1272\",\n \"CVE-2020-1273\",\n \"CVE-2020-1274\",\n \"CVE-2020-1275\",\n \"CVE-2020-1276\",\n \"CVE-2020-1277\",\n \"CVE-2020-1278\",\n \"CVE-2020-1279\",\n \"CVE-2020-1280\",\n \"CVE-2020-1281\",\n \"CVE-2020-1282\",\n \"CVE-2020-1283\",\n \"CVE-2020-1286\",\n \"CVE-2020-1287\",\n \"CVE-2020-1290\",\n \"CVE-2020-1291\",\n \"CVE-2020-1292\",\n \"CVE-2020-1293\",\n \"CVE-2020-1296\",\n \"CVE-2020-1299\",\n \"CVE-2020-1300\",\n \"CVE-2020-1301\",\n \"CVE-2020-1302\",\n \"CVE-2020-1304\",\n \"CVE-2020-1305\",\n \"CVE-2020-1306\",\n \"CVE-2020-1307\",\n \"CVE-2020-1309\",\n \"CVE-2020-1310\",\n \"CVE-2020-1311\",\n \"CVE-2020-1312\",\n \"CVE-2020-1313\",\n \"CVE-2020-1314\",\n \"CVE-2020-1315\",\n \"CVE-2020-1316\",\n \"CVE-2020-1317\",\n \"CVE-2020-1324\",\n \"CVE-2020-1334\",\n \"CVE-2020-1348\",\n \"CVE-2020-1441\"\n );\n script_xref(name:\"MSKB\", value:\"4560960\");\n script_xref(name:\"MSFT\", value:\"MS20-4560960\");\n script_xref(name:\"IAVA\", value:\"2020-A-0247-S\");\n script_xref(name:\"IAVA\", value:\"2020-A-0256-S\");\n script_xref(name:\"IAVA\", value:\"2020-A-0300-S\");\n\n script_name(english:\"KB4560960: Windows 10 Version 1903 and Windows 10 Version 1909 June 2020 Security Update\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"synopsis\", value:\n\"The remote Windows host is affected by multiple vulnerabilities.\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"description\", value:\n\"The remote Windows host is missing security update 4560960. It is, \ntherefore, affected by multiple vulnerabilities :\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way that the wlansvc.dll handles objects in memory. An\n attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability\n could execute code with elevated permissions.\n (CVE-2020-1270)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Windows kernel fails to properly handle objects in\n memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could run arbitrary code in kernel mode.\n An attacker could then install programs; view, change,\n or delete data; or create new accounts with full user\n rights. (CVE-2020-0986, CVE-2020-1246, CVE-2020-1262,\n CVE-2020-1264, CVE-2020-1266, CVE-2020-1269,\n CVE-2020-1273, CVE-2020-1274, CVE-2020-1275,\n CVE-2020-1276, CVE-2020-1307, CVE-2020-1316)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the\n Windows GDI component improperly discloses the contents\n of its memory. An attacker who successfully exploited\n the vulnerability could obtain information to further\n compromise the users system. There are multiple ways an\n attacker could exploit the vulnerability, such as by\n convincing a user to open a specially crafted document,\n or by convincing a user to visit an untrusted webpage.\n The security update addresses the vulnerability by\n correcting how the Windows GDI component handles objects\n in memory. (CVE-2020-1348)\n\n - A vulnerability exists in the way the Windows\n Diagnostics & feedback settings app handles objects\n in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could cause additional diagnostic data\n from the affected device to be sent to Microsoft.\n (CVE-2020-1296)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way that the Windows WalletService handles objects in\n memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the\n vulnerability could execute code with elevated\n permissions. (CVE-2020-1287)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the\n win32k component improperly provides kernel information.\n An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability\n could obtain information to further compromise the users\n system. (CVE-2020-1290)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists when\n Microsoft Windows OLE fails to properly validate user\n input. An attacker could exploit the vulnerability to\n execute malicious code. (CVE-2020-1281)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the\n way Windows Error Reporting (WER) handles objects in\n memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could obtain information to further\n compromise the users system. (CVE-2020-1261,\n CVE-2020-1263)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Windows Background Intelligent Transfer Service (BITS)\n IIS module improperly handles uploaded content. An\n attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability\n could upload restricted file types to an IIS-hosted\n folder. (CVE-2020-1255)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when\n Windows Error Reporting manager improperly handles a\n process crash. An attacker who successfully exploited\n this vulnerability could delete a targeted file leading\n to an elevated status. (CVE-2020-1197)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way that the Windows Network Connections Service handles\n objects in memory. An attacker who successfully\n exploited the vulnerability could execute code with\n elevated permissions. (CVE-2020-1291)\n\n - A memory corruption vulnerability exists when Windows\n Media Foundation improperly handles objects in memory.\n An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability\n could install programs; view, change, or delete data; or\n create new accounts with full user rights. There are\n multiple ways an attacker could exploit the\n vulnerability, such as by convincing a user to open a\n specially crafted document, or by convincing a user to\n visit a malicious webpage. The security update addresses\n the vulnerability by correcting how Windows Media\n Foundation handles objects in memory. (CVE-2020-1238,\n CVE-2020-1239)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the\n way that the Microsoft Server Message Block 3.1.1\n (SMBv3) protocol handles certain requests. An attacker\n who successfully exploited the vulnerability could\n obtain information to further compromise the users\n system. (CVE-2020-1206)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Diagnostics Hub Standard Collector or the Visual Studio\n Standard Collector fail to properly handle objects in\n memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could run processes in an elevated\n context. (CVE-2020-1202, CVE-2020-1203)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when\n Windows Mobile Device Management (MDM) Diagnostics\n improperly handles junctions. An attacker who\n successfully exploited this vulnerability could bypass\n access restrictions to delete files. (CVE-2020-1204)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way the Windows Now Playing Session Manager handles\n objects in memory. An attacker who successfully\n exploited this vulnerability could run processes in an\n elevated context. An attacker could then install\n programs; view, change or delete data. (CVE-2020-1201)\n\n - A denial of service vulnerability exists when Windows\n improperly handles objects in memory. An attacker who\n successfully exploited the vulnerability could cause a\n target system to stop responding. (CVE-2020-1283)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the\n Windows Jet Database Engine improperly handles objects\n in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could execute arbitrary code on a victim\n system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by\n enticing a victim to open a specially crafted file. The\n update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the way\n the Windows Jet Database Engine handles objects in\n memory. (CVE-2020-1208, CVE-2020-1236)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way that the Connected Devices Platform Service handles\n objects in memory. An attacker who successfully\n exploited the vulnerability could execute code with\n elevated permissions. (CVE-2020-1211)\n\n - A security feature bypass vulnerability exists when\n Windows Kernel fails to properly sanitize certain\n parameters. (CVE-2020-1241)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Diagnostics Hub Standard Collector Service improperly\n handles file operations. An attacker who successfully\n exploited this vulnerability could gain elevated\n privileges. An attacker with unprivileged access to a\n vulnerable system could exploit this vulnerability. The\n security update addresses the vulnerability by ensuring\n the Diagnostics Hub Standard Collector Service properly\n handles file operations. (CVE-2020-1257, CVE-2020-1278,\n CVE-2020-1293)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way that the Windows Bluetooth Service handles objects\n in memory. An attacker who successfully exploited the\n vulnerability could execute code with elevated\n permissions. (CVE-2020-1280)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way\n that the Windows Graphics Device Interface (GDI) handles\n objects in the memory. An attacker who successfully\n exploited this vulnerability could take control of the\n affected system. An attacker could then install\n programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new\n accounts with full user rights. (CVE-2020-1248)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n Windows Installer when the Windows Installer fails to\n properly sanitize input leading to an insecure library\n loading behavior. A locally authenticated attacker could\n run arbitrary code with elevated system privileges. An\n attacker could then install programs; view, change, or\n delete data; or create new accounts with full user\n rights. The security update addresses the vulnerability\n by correcting the input sanitization error to preclude\n unintended elevation. (CVE-2020-1272)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the\n Windows Runtime improperly handles objects in memory. An\n attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability\n could read memory that was freed and might run arbitrary\n code in an elevated context. An attacker could exploit\n this vulnerability by running a specially crafted\n application on the victim system. The update addresses\n the vulnerability by correcting the way the Windows\n Runtime handles objects in memory. (CVE-2020-1217)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists when\n Internet Explorer improperly handles objects in memory.\n An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability\n could obtain information to further compromise the users\n system. (CVE-2020-1315)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists in\n Microsoft Windows that could allow remote code execution\n if a .LNK file is processed. An attacker who\n successfully exploited this vulnerability could gain the\n same user rights as the local user. (CVE-2020-1299)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists when a\n Windows service improperly handles objects in memory. An\n attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability\n could obtain information to further compromise the users\n system. (CVE-2020-1268)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Windows Update Orchestrator Service improperly handles\n file operations. An attacker who successfully exploited\n this vulnerability could run processes in an elevated\n context. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by\n running a specially crafted application on the victim\n system. The update addresses the vulnerability by\n correcting the way the Windows Update Orchestrator\n Service handles file operations. (CVE-2020-1313)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists when\n Microsoft Windows fails to properly handle cabinet\n files. (CVE-2020-1300)\n\n - An elevation of privilege (user to user) vulnerability\n exists in Windows Security Health Service when handling\n certain objects in memory. (CVE-2020-1162,\n CVE-2020-1324)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way\n that the VBScript engine handles objects in memory. The\n vulnerability could corrupt memory in such a way that an\n attacker could execute arbitrary code in the context of\n the current user. An attacker who successfully exploited\n the vulnerability could gain the same user rights as the\n current user. (CVE-2020-1213, CVE-2020-1214,\n CVE-2020-1215, CVE-2020-1216, CVE-2020-1230,\n CVE-2020-1260)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Microsoft Store Runtime improperly handles memory.\n (CVE-2020-1222, CVE-2020-1309)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way\n that Microsoft browsers access objects in memory. The\n vulnerability could corrupt memory in a way that could\n allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code in the\n context of the current user. An attacker who\n successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the\n same user rights as the current user. (CVE-2020-1219)\n\n - A denial of service vulnerability exists when Windows\n Registry improperly handles filesystem operations. An\n attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability\n could cause a denial of service against a system.\n (CVE-2020-1194)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Windows Runtime improperly handles objects in memory. An\n attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability\n could run arbitrary code in an elevated context. An\n attacker could exploit this vulnerability by running a\n specially crafted application on the victim system. The\n update addresses the vulnerability by correcting the way\n the Windows Runtime handles objects in memory.\n (CVE-2020-1231, CVE-2020-1233, CVE-2020-1235,\n CVE-2020-1265, CVE-2020-1282, CVE-2020-1304,\n CVE-2020-1306, CVE-2020-1334)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists when the\n Microsoft Windows Graphics Component improperly handles\n objects in memory. An attacker who successfully\n exploited the vulnerability could obtain information to\n further compromise the users system. (CVE-2020-1160)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way\n that the ChakraCore scripting engine handles objects in\n memory. The vulnerability could corrupt memory in such a\n way that an attacker could execute arbitrary code in the\n context of the current user. An attacker who\n successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the\n same user rights as the current user. (CVE-2020-1073)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Windows State Repository Service improperly handles\n objects in memory. An attacker who successfully\n exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code in\n an elevated context. An attacker could exploit this\n vulnerability by running a specially crafted application\n on the victim system. The update addresses the\n vulnerability by correcting the way the Windows State\n Repository Service handles objects in memory.\n (CVE-2020-1305)\n\n - A security feature bypass vulnerability exists when\n Windows Host Guardian Service improperly handles hashes\n recorded and logged. An attacker who successfully\n exploited the vulnerability could tamper with the log\n file. In an attack scenario, an attacker can change\n existing event log types to a type the parsers do not\n interpret allowing an attacker to append their own hash\n without triggering an alert. The update addresses the\n vulnerability by correcting how Windows Host Guardian\n Service handles logging of the measured boot hash.\n (CVE-2020-1259)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way that the Windows Network List Service handles\n objects in memory. An attacker who successfully\n exploited the vulnerability could execute code with\n elevated permissions. (CVE-2020-1209)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way\n that the Microsoft Server Message Block 1.0 (SMBv1)\n server handles certain requests. An attacker who\n successfully exploited the vulnerability could gain the\n ability to execute code on the target server.\n (CVE-2020-1301)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Windows Backup Service improperly handles file\n operations. (CVE-2020-1271)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in\n Windows Installer because of the way Windows Installer\n handles certain filesystem operations. (CVE-2020-1277,\n CVE-2020-1302, CVE-2020-1312)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the\n way that Microsoft Edge handles cross-origin requests.\n An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could determine the origin of all webpages\n in the affected browser. (CVE-2020-1242)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when an\n OLE Automation component improperly handles memory.\n (CVE-2020-1212)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when\n Group Policy improperly checks access. An attacker who\n successfully exploited this vulnerability could run\n processes in an elevated context. (CVE-2020-1317)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when\n Windows Lockscreen fails to properly load spotlight\n images from a secure location. An attacker who\n successfully exploited the vulnerability could execute\n commands with elevated permissions. An authenticated\n attacker could modify a registry value to exploit this\n vulnerability. The security update addresses the\n vulnerability by ensuring that the spotlight images are\n always loaded from a secure location. (CVE-2020-1279)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in\n OpenSSH for Windows when it does not properly restrict\n access to configuration settings. An attacker who\n successfully exploited this vulnerability could replace\n the shell with a malicious binary. (CVE-2020-1292)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way that the printconfig.dll handles objects in memory.\n An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability\n could execute code with elevated permissions.\n (CVE-2020-1196)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way that the Windows Graphics Device Interface (GDI)\n handles objects in memory. An attacker who successfully\n exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code in\n kernel mode. An attacker could then install programs;\n view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts\n with full user rights. (CVE-2020-0915, CVE-2020-0916)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when\n Windows Modules Installer Service improperly handles\n class object members. A locally authenticated attacker\n could run arbitrary code with elevated system\n privileges. An attacker could then install programs;\n view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts\n with full user rights. The update addresses the\n vulnerability by correcting how Windows handles calls to\n preclude unintended elevation. (CVE-2020-1254)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when\n Component Object Model (COM) client uses special case\n IIDs. An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could run arbitrary code with elevated\n system privileges. An attacker could then install\n programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new\n accounts with full user rights. (CVE-2020-1311)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in\n Windows when the Windows kernel-mode driver fails to\n properly handle objects in memory. An attacker who\n successfully exploited this vulnerability could run\n arbitrary code in kernel mode. An attacker could then\n install programs; view, change, or delete data; or\n create new accounts with full user rights.\n (CVE-2020-1207, CVE-2020-1247, CVE-2020-1251,\n CVE-2020-1253, CVE-2020-1310)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in the\n way that the Windows Kernel handles objects in memory.\n An attacker who successfully exploited the vulnerability\n could execute code with elevated permissions.\n (CVE-2020-1237)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when\n DirectX improperly handles objects in memory. An\n attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability\n could run arbitrary code in kernel mode. An attacker\n could then install programs; view, change, or delete\n data; or create new accounts with full user rights.\n (CVE-2020-1258)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when\n Windows Error Reporting improperly handles objects in\n memory. (CVE-2020-1234)\n\n - A spoofing vulnerability exists when theMicrosoft Edge\n (Chromium-based) in IE Mode improperly handles specific\n redirects. An attacker who successfully exploits the IE\n Mode vulnerability could trick a user into believing\n that the user was on a legitimate website. The specially\n crafted website could either spoof content or serve as a\n pivot to chain an attack with other vulnerabilities in\n web services. (CVE-2020-1220)\n\n - An information disclosure vulnerability exists when\n Media Foundation improperly handles objects in memory.\n An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could obtain information to further\n compromise the users system. (CVE-2020-1232)\n\n - A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the\n Windows Shell does not properly validate file paths. An\n attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability\n could run arbitrary code in the context of the current\n user. If the current user is logged on as an\n administrator, an attacker could take control of the\n affected system. An attacker could then install\n programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new\n accounts with elevated privileges. Users whose accounts\n are configured to have fewer privileges on the system\n could be less impacted than users who operate with\n administrative privileges. (CVE-2020-1286)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in\n Windows Text Service Framework (TSF) when the TSF server\n fails to properly handle messages sent from TSF clients.\n An attacker who successfully exploited this\n vulnerability could run arbitrary code in a privileged\n process. An attacker could then install programs; view,\n change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full\n user rights. (CVE-2020-1314)\n\n - A denial of service vulnerability exists when Connected\n User Experiences and Telemetry Service improperly\n handles file operations. An attacker who successfully\n exploited this vulnerability could cause a system to\n stop responding. (CVE-2020-1244)\n\n - An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists when the\n Windows Spatial Data Service improperly handles objects\n in memory. An attacker could exploit the vulnerability\n to overwrite or modify a protected file leading to a\n privilege escalation. (CVE-2020-1441)\");\n # https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/4560960/windows-10-update-kb4560960\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"see_also\", value:\"http://www.nessus.org/u?98e819b7\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"solution\", value:\n\"Apply Cumulative Update KB4560960.\");\n script_set_cvss_base_vector(\"CVSS2#AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C\");\n script_set_cvss_temporal_vector(\"CVSS2#E:H/RL:OF/RC:C\");\n script_set_cvss3_base_vector(\"CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H\");\n script_set_cvss3_temporal_vector(\"CVSS:3.0/E:H/RL:O/RC:C\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"cvss_score_source\", value:\"CVE-2020-1307\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploitability_ease\", value:\"Exploits are available\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploit_available\", value:\"true\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploited_by_malware\", value:\"true\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"metasploit_name\", value:'Windows Update Orchestrator unchecked ScheduleWork call');\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"exploit_framework_metasploit\", value:\"true\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"vuln_publication_date\", value:\"2020/06/09\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"patch_publication_date\", value:\"2020/06/09\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"plugin_publication_date\", value:\"2020/06/09\");\n\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"plugin_type\", value:\"local\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"cpe\", value:\"cpe:/o:microsoft:windows\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"cpe\", value:\"cpe:/a:microsoft:edge\");\n script_set_attribute(attribute:\"stig_severity\", value:\"I\");\n script_end_attributes();\n\n script_category(ACT_GATHER_INFO);\n script_family(english:\"Windows : Microsoft Bulletins\");\n\n script_copyright(english:\"This script is Copyright (C) 2020 and is owned by Tenable, Inc. or an Affiliate thereof.\");\n\n script_dependencies(\"smb_check_rollup.nasl\", \"smb_hotfixes.nasl\", \"ms_bulletin_checks_possible.nasl\");\n script_require_keys(\"SMB/MS_Bulletin_Checks/Possible\");\n script_require_ports(139, 445, \"Host/patch_management_checks\");\n\n exit(0);\n}\n\ninclude('audit.inc');\ninclude('smb_func.inc');\ninclude('smb_hotfixes.inc');\ninclude('smb_hotfixes_fcheck.inc');\ninclude('smb_reg_query.inc');\ninclude('install_func.inc');\n\nget_kb_item_or_exit('SMB/MS_Bulletin_Checks/Possible');\n\nbulletin = 'MS20-06';\nkbs = make_list(\n '4560960'\n);\n\nif (get_kb_item('Host/patch_management_checks')) hotfix_check_3rd_party(bulletin:bulletin, kbs:kbs, severity:SECURITY_HOLE);\n\nget_kb_item_or_exit('SMB/Registry/Enumerated');\nget_kb_item_or_exit('SMB/WindowsVersion', exit_code:1);\n\nif (hotfix_check_sp_range(win10:'0') <= 0) audit(AUDIT_OS_SP_NOT_VULN);\n\nshare = hotfix_get_systemdrive(as_share:TRUE, exit_on_fail:TRUE);\nif (!is_accessible_share(share:share)) audit(AUDIT_SHARE_FAIL, share);\n\nif (\n smb_check_rollup(os:'10',\n sp:0,\n os_build:'18362',\n rollup_date:'06_2020',\n bulletin:bulletin,\n rollup_kb_list:[4560960]) ||\n smb_check_rollup(os:'10',\n sp:0,\n os_build:'18363',\n rollup_date:'06_2020',\n bulletin:bulletin,\n rollup_kb_list:[4560960])\n)\n{\n replace_kb_item(name:'SMB/Missing/'+bulletin, value:TRUE);\n hotfix_security_hole();\n hotfix_check_fversion_end();\n exit(0);\n}\nelse\n{\n hotfix_check_fversion_end();\n audit(AUDIT_HOST_NOT, hotfix_get_audit_report());\n}\n\n", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}], "openvas": [{"lastseen": "2020-07-21T19:51:39", "bulletinFamily": "scanner", "cvelist": ["CVE-2020-1244", "CVE-2020-1253", "CVE-2020-1073", "CVE-2020-1203", "CVE-2020-1277", "CVE-2020-1207", "CVE-2020-1275", "CVE-2020-1287", "CVE-2020-1237", "CVE-2020-1272", "CVE-2020-1300", "CVE-2020-1276", "CVE-2020-0916", "CVE-2020-1235", "CVE-2020-1290", "CVE-2020-1220", "CVE-2020-1278", "CVE-2020-1263", "CVE-2020-1310", "CVE-2020-1251", "CVE-2020-1274", "CVE-2020-1301", "CVE-2020-1254", "CVE-2020-1212", "CVE-2020-1280", "CVE-2020-1211", "CVE-2020-1279", "CVE-2020-1273", "CVE-2020-1213", "CVE-2020-1219", "CVE-2020-1306", "CVE-2020-1305", "CVE-2020-1160", "CVE-2020-1236", "CVE-2020-1266", "CVE-2020-1311", "CVE-2020-1258", "CVE-2020-1317", "CVE-2020-1334", "CVE-2020-1307", "CVE-2020-1259", "CVE-2020-1257", "CVE-2020-0986", "CVE-2020-1262", "CVE-2020-1215", "CVE-2020-1209", "CVE-2020-1199", "CVE-2020-1231", "CVE-2020-1281", "CVE-2020-1313", "CVE-2020-1255", "CVE-2020-1232", "CVE-2020-1299", "CVE-2020-1302", "CVE-2020-1296", "CVE-2020-1222", "CVE-2020-1241", "CVE-2020-1216", "CVE-2020-1292", "CVE-2020-1234", "CVE-2020-1247", "CVE-2020-1304", "CVE-2020-1324", "CVE-2020-1312", "CVE-2020-1271", "CVE-2020-1246", "CVE-2020-1261", "CVE-2020-1348", "CVE-2020-1314", "CVE-2020-1282", "CVE-2020-1208", "CVE-2020-1204", "CVE-2020-1239", "CVE-2020-1214", "CVE-2020-1269", "CVE-2020-1233", "CVE-2020-1194", "CVE-2020-0915", "CVE-2020-1265", "CVE-2020-1268", "CVE-2020-1162", "CVE-2020-1316", "CVE-2020-1294", "CVE-2020-1293", "CVE-2020-1238", "CVE-2020-1286", "CVE-2020-1242", "CVE-2020-1206", "CVE-2020-1264", "CVE-2020-1196", "CVE-2020-1309", "CVE-2020-1315", "CVE-2020-1230", "CVE-2020-1201", "CVE-2020-1270", "CVE-2020-1248", "CVE-2020-1202", "CVE-2020-1291", "CVE-2020-1260", "CVE-2020-1217", "CVE-2020-1197", "CVE-2020-1283"], "description": "This host is missing a critical security\n update according to Microsoft KB4560960", "modified": "2020-07-17T00:00:00", "published": "2020-06-10T00:00:00", "id": "OPENVAS:1361412562310817140", "href": "http://plugins.openvas.org/nasl.php?oid=1361412562310817140", "type": "openvas", "title": "Microsoft Windows Multiple Vulnerabilities (KB4560960)", "sourceData": "# Copyright (C) 2020 Greenbone Networks GmbH\n# Some text descriptions might be excerpted from (a) referenced\n# source(s), and are Copyright (C) by the respective right holder(s).\n#\n# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later\n#\n# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or\n# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License\n# as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2\n# of the License, or (at your option) any later version.\n#\n# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,\n# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of\n# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the\n# GNU General Public License for more details.\n#\n# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License\n# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software\n# Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.\n\nif(description)\n{\n script_oid(\"1.3.6.1.4.1.25623.1.0.817140\");\n script_version(\"2020-07-17T05:57:41+0000\");\n script_cve_id(\"CVE-2020-0915\", \"CVE-2020-0916\", \"CVE-2020-0986\", \"CVE-2020-1073\",\n \"CVE-2020-1160\", \"CVE-2020-1162\", \"CVE-2020-1194\", \"CVE-2020-1196\",\n \"CVE-2020-1197\", \"CVE-2020-1199\", \"CVE-2020-1201\", \"CVE-2020-1202\",\n \"CVE-2020-1203\", \"CVE-2020-1204\", \"CVE-2020-1206\", \"CVE-2020-1207\",\n \"CVE-2020-1208\", \"CVE-2020-1209\", \"CVE-2020-1211\", \"CVE-2020-1212\",\n \"CVE-2020-1213\", \"CVE-2020-1214\", \"CVE-2020-1215\", \"CVE-2020-1216\",\n \"CVE-2020-1217\", \"CVE-2020-1219\", \"CVE-2020-1220\", \"CVE-2020-1222\",\n \"CVE-2020-1230\", \"CVE-2020-1231\", \"CVE-2020-1232\", \"CVE-2020-1233\",\n \"CVE-2020-1234\", \"CVE-2020-1235\", \"CVE-2020-1236\", \"CVE-2020-1237\",\n \"CVE-2020-1238\", \"CVE-2020-1239\", \"CVE-2020-1241\", \"CVE-2020-1242\",\n \"CVE-2020-1244\", \"CVE-2020-1246\", \"CVE-2020-1247\", \"CVE-2020-1248\",\n \"CVE-2020-1251\", \"CVE-2020-1253\", \"CVE-2020-1254\", \"CVE-2020-1255\",\n \"CVE-2020-1257\", \"CVE-2020-1258\", \"CVE-2020-1259\", \"CVE-2020-1260\",\n \"CVE-2020-1261\", \"CVE-2020-1262\", \"CVE-2020-1263\", \"CVE-2020-1264\",\n \"CVE-2020-1265\", \"CVE-2020-1266\", \"CVE-2020-1268\", \"CVE-2020-1269\",\n \"CVE-2020-1270\", \"CVE-2020-1271\", \"CVE-2020-1272\", \"CVE-2020-1273\",\n \"CVE-2020-1274\", \"CVE-2020-1275\", \"CVE-2020-1276\", \"CVE-2020-1277\",\n \"CVE-2020-1278\", \"CVE-2020-1279\", \"CVE-2020-1280\", \"CVE-2020-1281\",\n \"CVE-2020-1282\", \"CVE-2020-1283\", \"CVE-2020-1286\", \"CVE-2020-1287\",\n \"CVE-2020-1290\", \"CVE-2020-1291\", \"CVE-2020-1292\", \"CVE-2020-1293\",\n \"CVE-2020-1294\", \"CVE-2020-1296\", \"CVE-2020-1299\", \"CVE-2020-1300\",\n \"CVE-2020-1301\", \"CVE-2020-1302\", \"CVE-2020-1304\", \"CVE-2020-1305\",\n \"CVE-2020-1306\", \"CVE-2020-1307\", \"CVE-2020-1309\", \"CVE-2020-1310\",\n \"CVE-2020-1311\", \"CVE-2020-1312\", \"CVE-2020-1313\", \"CVE-2020-1314\",\n \"CVE-2020-1315\", \"CVE-2020-1316\", \"CVE-2020-1317\", \"CVE-2020-1324\",\n \"CVE-2020-1334\", \"CVE-2020-1348\");\n script_tag(name:\"cvss_base\", value:\"9.3\");\n script_tag(name:\"cvss_base_vector\", value:\"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C\");\n script_tag(name:\"last_modification\", value:\"2020-07-17 05:57:41 +0000 (Fri, 17 Jul 2020)\");\n script_tag(name:\"creation_date\", value:\"2020-06-10 08:52:23 +0530 (Wed, 10 Jun 2020)\");\n script_name(\"Microsoft Windows Multiple Vulnerabilities (KB4560960)\");\n\n script_tag(name:\"summary\", value:\"This host is missing a critical security\n update according to Microsoft KB4560960\");\n\n script_tag(name:\"vuldetect\", value:\"Checks if a vulnerable version is present\n on the target host.\");\n\n script_tag(name:\"insight\", value:\"Multiple flaws exists due to,\n\n - An error when the Windows kernel fails to properly handle objects in memory.\n\n - An error when the Windows GDI component improperly discloses the contents of its\n memory.\n\n - An error when the Windows Runtime improperly handles objects in memory.\n\n - An error in the way that the VBScript engine handles objects in memory.\n\n Please see the references for more information about the vulnerabilities.\");\n\n script_tag(name:\"impact\", value:\"Successful exploitation will allow an attacker\n to execute arbitrary code, elevate privilges, disclose sensitive information and\n conduct denial of service attacks.\");\n\n script_tag(name:\"affected\", value:\"- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1903 for 32-bit/x64-based Systems\n\n - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 1909 for 32-bit/x64-based Systems\");\n\n script_tag(name:\"solution\", value:\"The vendor has released updates. Please see the references for more information.\");\n script_tag(name:\"solution_type\", value:\"VendorFix\");\n\n script_tag(name:\"qod_type\", value:\"executable_version\");\n\n script_xref(name:\"URL\", value:\"https://support.microsoft.com/en-gb/help/4560960\");\n script_category(ACT_GATHER_INFO);\n script_copyright(\"Copyright (C) 2020 Greenbone Networks GmbH\");\n script_family(\"Windows : Microsoft Bulletins\");\n script_dependencies(\"smb_reg_service_pack.nasl\");\n script_require_ports(139, 445);\n script_mandatory_keys(\"SMB/WindowsVersion\");\n exit(0);\n}\n\ninclude(\"smb_nt.inc\");\ninclude(\"secpod_reg.inc\");\ninclude(\"version_func.inc\");\ninclude(\"secpod_smb_func.inc\");\n\nif(hotfix_check_sp(win10:1, win10x64:1) <= 0){\n exit(0);\n}\n\nsysPath = smb_get_system32root();\nif(!sysPath)\n exit(0);\n\nfileVer = fetch_file_version(sysPath:sysPath, file_name:\"Kernel32.dll\");\nif(!fileVer)\n exit(0);\n\nif(version_in_range(version:fileVer, test_version:\"10.0.18362.0\", test_version2:\"10.0.18362.899\")) {\n report = report_fixed_ver(file_checked:sysPath + \"\\Kernel32.dll\",\n file_version:fileVer, vulnerable_range:\"10.0.18362.0 - 10.0.18362.899\");\n security_message(data:report);\n exit(0);\n}\n\nexit(99);\n", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}, {"lastseen": "2020-07-21T19:51:35", "bulletinFamily": "scanner", "cvelist": ["CVE-2020-1244", "CVE-2020-1253", "CVE-2020-1203", "CVE-2020-1277", "CVE-2020-1207", "CVE-2020-1275", "CVE-2020-1287", "CVE-2020-1237", "CVE-2020-1272", "CVE-2020-1300", "CVE-2020-1276", "CVE-2020-0916", "CVE-2020-1235", "CVE-2020-1290", "CVE-2020-1220", "CVE-2020-1278", "CVE-2020-1263", "CVE-2020-1251", "CVE-2020-1274", "CVE-2020-1301", "CVE-2020-1254", "CVE-2020-1212", "CVE-2020-1280", "CVE-2020-1211", "CVE-2020-1279", "CVE-2020-1273", "CVE-2020-1213", "CVE-2020-1219", "CVE-2020-1284", "CVE-2020-1120", "CVE-2020-1306", "CVE-2020-1305", "CVE-2020-1160", "CVE-2020-1236", "CVE-2020-1266", "CVE-2020-1311", "CVE-2020-1258", "CVE-2020-1317", "CVE-2020-1334", "CVE-2020-1307", "CVE-2020-1259", "CVE-2020-1257", "CVE-2020-0986", "CVE-2020-1262", "CVE-2020-1215", "CVE-2020-1209", "CVE-2020-1199", "CVE-2020-1231", "CVE-2020-1281", "CVE-2020-1313", "CVE-2020-1255", "CVE-2020-1232", "CVE-2020-1299", "CVE-2020-1302", "CVE-2020-1296", "CVE-2020-1222", "CVE-2020-1241", "CVE-2020-1216", "CVE-2020-1292", "CVE-2020-1234", "CVE-2020-1247", "CVE-2020-1304", "CVE-2020-1324", "CVE-2020-1312", "CVE-2020-1271", "CVE-2020-1246", "CVE-2020-1261", "CVE-2020-1348", "CVE-2020-1314", "CVE-2020-1282", "CVE-2020-1208", "CVE-2020-1204", "CVE-2020-1239", "CVE-2020-1214", "CVE-2020-1269", "CVE-2020-1233", "CVE-2020-1194", "CVE-2020-0915", "CVE-2020-1268", "CVE-2020-1162", "CVE-2020-1316", "CVE-2020-1294", "CVE-2020-1293", "CVE-2020-1238", "CVE-2020-1286", "CVE-2020-1242", "CVE-2020-1206", "CVE-2020-1264", "CVE-2020-1196", "CVE-2020-1309", "CVE-2020-1315", "CVE-2020-1230", "CVE-2020-1201", "CVE-2020-1270", "CVE-2020-1248", "CVE-2020-1202", "CVE-2020-1291", "CVE-2020-1217", "CVE-2020-1197", "CVE-2020-1283"], "description": "This host is missing a critical security\n update according to Microsoft KB4557957", "modified": "2020-07-17T00:00:00", "published": "2020-06-10T00:00:00", "id": "OPENVAS:1361412562310817144", "href": "http://plugins.openvas.org/nasl.php?oid=1361412562310817144", "type": "openvas", "title": "Microsoft Windows Multiple Vulnerabilities (KB4557957)", "sourceData": "# Copyright (C) 2020 Greenbone Networks GmbH\n# Some text descriptions might be excerpted from (a) referenced\n# source(s), and are Copyright (C) by the respective right holder(s).\n#\n# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later\n#\n# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or\n# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License\n# as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2\n# of the License, or (at your option) any later version.\n#\n# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,\n# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of\n# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the\n# GNU General Public License for more details.\n#\n# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License\n# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software\n# Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.\n\nif(description)\n{\n script_oid(\"1.3.6.1.4.1.25623.1.0.817144\");\n script_version(\"2020-07-17T05:57:41+0000\");\n script_cve_id(\"CVE-2020-0915\", \"CVE-2020-0916\", \"CVE-2020-0986\", \"CVE-2020-1120\",\n \"CVE-2020-1160\", \"CVE-2020-1162\", \"CVE-2020-1194\", \"CVE-2020-1196\",\n \"CVE-2020-1197\", \"CVE-2020-1199\", \"CVE-2020-1201\", \"CVE-2020-1202\",\n \"CVE-2020-1203\", \"CVE-2020-1204\", \"CVE-2020-1206\", \"CVE-2020-1207\",\n \"CVE-2020-1208\", \"CVE-2020-1209\", \"CVE-2020-1211\", \"CVE-2020-1212\",\n \"CVE-2020-1213\", \"CVE-2020-1214\", \"CVE-2020-1215\", \"CVE-2020-1216\",\n \"CVE-2020-1217\", \"CVE-2020-1219\", \"CVE-2020-1220\", \"CVE-2020-1222\",\n \"CVE-2020-1230\", \"CVE-2020-1231\", \"CVE-2020-1232\", \"CVE-2020-1233\",\n \"CVE-2020-1234\", \"CVE-2020-1235\", \"CVE-2020-1236\", \"CVE-2020-1237\",\n \"CVE-2020-1238\", \"CVE-2020-1239\", \"CVE-2020-1241\", \"CVE-2020-1242\",\n \"CVE-2020-1244\", \"CVE-2020-1246\", \"CVE-2020-1247\", \"CVE-2020-1248\",\n \"CVE-2020-1251\", \"CVE-2020-1253\", \"CVE-2020-1254\", \"CVE-2020-1255\",\n \"CVE-2020-1257\", \"CVE-2020-1258\", \"CVE-2020-1259\", \"CVE-2020-1261\",\n \"CVE-2020-1262\", \"CVE-2020-1263\", \"CVE-2020-1264\", \"CVE-2020-1266\",\n \"CVE-2020-1268\", \"CVE-2020-1269\", \"CVE-2020-1270\", \"CVE-2020-1271\",\n \"CVE-2020-1272\", \"CVE-2020-1273\", \"CVE-2020-1274\", \"CVE-2020-1275\",\n \"CVE-2020-1276\", \"CVE-2020-1277\", \"CVE-2020-1278\", \"CVE-2020-1279\",\n \"CVE-2020-1280\", \"CVE-2020-1281\", \"CVE-2020-1282\", \"CVE-2020-1283\",\n \"CVE-2020-1284\", \"CVE-2020-1286\", \"CVE-2020-1287\", \"CVE-2020-1290\",\n \"CVE-2020-1291\", \"CVE-2020-1292\", \"CVE-2020-1293\", \"CVE-2020-1294\",\n \"CVE-2020-1296\", \"CVE-2020-1299\", \"CVE-2020-1300\", \"CVE-2020-1301\",\n \"CVE-2020-1302\", \"CVE-2020-1304\", \"CVE-2020-1305\", \"CVE-2020-1306\",\n \"CVE-2020-1307\", \"CVE-2020-1309\", \"CVE-2020-1311\", \"CVE-2020-1312\",\n \"CVE-2020-1313\", \"CVE-2020-1314\", \"CVE-2020-1315\", \"CVE-2020-1316\",\n \"CVE-2020-1317\", \"CVE-2020-1324\", \"CVE-2020-1334\", \"CVE-2020-1348\");\n script_tag(name:\"cvss_base\", value:\"9.3\");\n script_tag(name:\"cvss_base_vector\", value:\"AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C\");\n script_tag(name:\"last_modification\", value:\"2020-07-17 05:57:41 +0000 (Fri, 17 Jul 2020)\");\n script_tag(name:\"creation_date\", value:\"2020-06-10 08:52:23 +0530 (Wed, 10 Jun 2020)\");\n script_name(\"Microsoft Windows Multiple Vulnerabilities (KB4557957)\");\n\n script_tag(name:\"summary\", value:\"This host is missing a critical security\n update according to Microsoft KB4557957\");\n\n script_tag(name:\"vuldetect\", value:\"Checks if a vulnerable version is present\n on the target host.\");\n\n script_tag(name:\"insight\", value:\"Multiple flaws exists due to,\n\n - An error when the Windows kernel fails to properly handle objects in memory.\n\n - An error when the Windows GDI component improperly discloses the contents of its\n memory.\n\n - An error when the Windows Runtime improperly handles objects in memory.\n\n - An error when Connected User Experiences and Telemetry Service improperly\n handles file operations.\n Please see the references for more information about the vulnerabilities.\");\n\n script_tag(name:\"impact\", value:\"Successful exploitation will allow an attacker\n to execute arbitrary code, elevate privilges, disclose sensitive information, bypass\n security restrictions, conduct spoofing and denial of service attacks.\");\n\n script_tag(name:\"affected\", value:\"- Microsoft Windows 10 Version 2004 for 32-bit Systems\n\n - Microsoft Windows 10 Version 2004 for x64-based Systems\");\n\n script_tag(name:\"solution\", value:\"The vendor has released updates. Please see\n the references for more information.\");\n\n script_tag(name:\"solution_type\", value:\"VendorFix\");\n script_tag(name:\"qod_type\", value:\"executable_version\");\n script_xref(name:\"URL\", value:\"https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/4557957\");\n script_category(ACT_GATHER_INFO);\n script_copyright(\"Copyright (C) 2020 Greenbone Networks GmbH\");\n script_family(\"Windows : Microsoft Bulletins\");\n script_dependencies(\"smb_reg_service_pack.nasl\");\n script_require_ports(139, 445);\n script_mandatory_keys(\"SMB/WindowsVersion\");\n exit(0);\n}\n\ninclude(\"smb_nt.inc\");\ninclude(\"secpod_reg.inc\");\ninclude(\"version_func.inc\");\ninclude(\"secpod_smb_func.inc\");\n\nif(hotfix_check_sp(win10:1, win10x64:1) <= 0){\n exit(0);\n}\n\nsysPath = smb_get_system32root();\nif(!sysPath)\n exit(0);\n\ndllVer = fetch_file_version(sysPath:sysPath, file_name:\"Gdiplus.dll\");\nif(!dllVer)\n exit(0);\n\nif(version_in_range(version:dllVer, test_version:\"10.0.19041.0\", test_version2:\"10.0.19041.328\")) {\n report = report_fixed_ver(file_checked:sysPath + \"\\Gdiplus.dll\",\n file_version:dllVer, vulnerable_range:\"10.0.19041.0 - 10.0.19041.328\");\n security_message(data:report);\n exit(0);\n}\n\nexit(99);\n", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}], "avleonov": [{"lastseen": "2020-08-07T08:03:36", "bulletinFamily": "blog", "cvelist": ["CVE-2020-0796", "CVE-2020-0915", "CVE-2020-0916", "CVE-2020-0986", "CVE-2020-1073", "CVE-2020-1120", "CVE-2020-1148", "CVE-2020-1160", "CVE-2020-1162", "CVE-2020-1163", "CVE-2020-1170", "CVE-2020-1177", "CVE-2020-1178", "CVE-2020-1181", "CVE-2020-1183", "CVE-2020-1194", "CVE-2020-1196", "CVE-2020-1197", "CVE-2020-1199", "CVE-2020-1201", "CVE-2020-1202", "CVE-2020-1203", "CVE-2020-1204", "CVE-2020-1206", "CVE-2020-1207", "CVE-2020-1208", "CVE-2020-1209", "CVE-2020-1211", "CVE-2020-1212", "CVE-2020-1213", "CVE-2020-1214", "CVE-2020-1215", "CVE-2020-1216", "CVE-2020-1217", "CVE-2020-1219", "CVE-2020-1220", "CVE-2020-1221", "CVE-2020-1222", "CVE-2020-1223", "CVE-2020-1225", "CVE-2020-1226", "CVE-2020-1229", "CVE-2020-1230", "CVE-2020-1231", "CVE-2020-1232", "CVE-2020-1233", "CVE-2020-1234", "CVE-2020-1235", "CVE-2020-1236", "CVE-2020-1237", "CVE-2020-1238", "CVE-2020-1239", "CVE-2020-1241", "CVE-2020-1242", "CVE-2020-1244", "CVE-2020-1246", "CVE-2020-1247", "CVE-2020-1248", "CVE-2020-1251", "CVE-2020-1253", "CVE-2020-1254", "CVE-2020-1255", "CVE-2020-1257", "CVE-2020-1258", "CVE-2020-1259", "CVE-2020-1260", "CVE-2020-1261", "CVE-2020-1262", "CVE-2020-1263", "CVE-2020-1264", "CVE-2020-1265", "CVE-2020-1266", "CVE-2020-1268", "CVE-2020-1269", "CVE-2020-1270", "CVE-2020-1271", "CVE-2020-1272", "CVE-2020-1273", "CVE-2020-1274", "CVE-2020-1275", "CVE-2020-1276", "CVE-2020-1277", "CVE-2020-1278", "CVE-2020-1279", "CVE-2020-1280", "CVE-2020-1281", "CVE-2020-1282", "CVE-2020-1283", "CVE-2020-1284", "CVE-2020-1286", "CVE-2020-1287", "CVE-2020-1289", "CVE-2020-1290", "CVE-2020-1291", "CVE-2020-1292", "CVE-2020-1293", "CVE-2020-1294", "CVE-2020-1295", "CVE-2020-1296", "CVE-2020-1297", "CVE-2020-1298", "CVE-2020-1299", "CVE-2020-1300", "CVE-2020-1301", "CVE-2020-1302", "CVE-2020-1304", "CVE-2020-1305", "CVE-2020-1306", "CVE-2020-1307", "CVE-2020-1309", "CVE-2020-1310", "CVE-2020-1311", "CVE-2020-1312", "CVE-2020-1313", "CVE-2020-1314", "CVE-2020-1315", "CVE-2020-1316", "CVE-2020-1317", "CVE-2020-1318", "CVE-2020-1320", "CVE-2020-1321", "CVE-2020-1322", "CVE-2020-1323", "CVE-2020-1324", "CVE-2020-1327", "CVE-2020-1328", "CVE-2020-1329", "CVE-2020-1331", "CVE-2020-1334", "CVE-2020-1340", "CVE-2020-1343", "CVE-2020-1348"], "description": "This time, Microsoft addressed 129 vulnerabilities: 11 critical and 118 important. In fact, in the file that I exported from the Microsoft website, I saw 2 more CVEs (CVE-2020-1221, CVE-2020-1328) related to Microsoft Dynamics 365 (on-premises). But there is no information on them on the Microsoft website, in the MITRE CVE database and NVD. Does this mean that these CVE ids were mentioned unintentionally and related to some critical issues? I don't think so, but this is strange.\n\n\n\nThis time there were no vulnerabilities with detected exploitation, so let's start with the group "Exploitation more likely" according to Microsoft.\n\n## Exploitation more likely (15)\n\n#### Remote Code Execution\n\n * Microsoft Browser ([CVE-2020-1219](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1219>))\n * VBScript ([CVE-2020-1214](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1214>), [CVE-2020-1215](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1215>), [CVE-2020-1230](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1230>), [CVE-2020-1213](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1213>), [CVE-2020-1216](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1216>), [CVE-2020-1260](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1260>))\n * Windows SMB ([CVE-2020-1301](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1301>))\n\n#### Denial of Service\n\n * Windows SMBv3 Client/Server ([CVE-2020-1284](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1284>))\n\n#### Elevation of Privilege\n\n * Windows Kernel ([CVE-2020-1207](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1207>), [CVE-2020-1247](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1247>), [CVE-2020-1251](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1251>), [CVE-2020-1253](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1253>))\n\n#### Security Feature Bypass\n\n * Windows Kernel ([CVE-2020-1241](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1241>))\n\n#### Information Disclosure\n\n * Windows SMBv3 Client/Server ([CVE-2020-1206](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1206>))\n\nI think the SMB vulnerabilities should be addressed first.\n\n 1. Remote Code Execution in SMBv1 (CVE-2020-1301) protocol is called "SMBLost". The attacker should send a specially crafted packet to the target SMBv1 server. But unlike the famous EternalBlue, the attacker have to be authenticated and there should be a shared partition on the server (e.g. \u201cc:\\\u201d or \u201cd:\\\u201d), so it should be much less harmful. Anyway, if SMBv1 is not a mission critical component of your infrastructure, disable it!\n 2. Denial of Service in SMBv3 Client or Server (CVE-2020-1284). An authenticated attacker have to send a specially crafted packet to a vulnerable SMB server or host a maliciously configured SMBv3 server and convince the client to connect to it. The vulnerability exists in Windows 10 Version 2004 and Windows Server, version 2004 (Server Core installation).\n 3. The most interesting SMB vulnerability is Information Disclosure in SMBv3 Client/Server (CVE-2020-1206). It is called "SMBleed". And what makes it interesting is that the company, that discovered this vulnerability, ZecOps, released a PoC that combines SMBleed exploitation with the exploitation of March SMBGhost (CVE-2020-0796) vulnerability to gain unauthenticated RCE! ([write up](<https://blog.zecops.com/vulnerabilities/smbleedingghost-writeup-chaining-smbleed-cve-2020-1206-with-smbghost/>) , [PoC](<https://github.com/ZecOps/CVE-2020-0796-RCE-POC>)) And it seems much more reliable than the code that was published earlier (for example, [PoC by chompie1337](<https://github.com/chompie1337/SMBGhost_RCE_PoC>)). This means that we are one step closer to real attacks that will exploit this vulnerability.\n\nOf course, you can say that SMBleed, SMBGhost and this new DoS vulnerability (CVE-2020-1284) affect only different versions of Windows 10 and Windows Server Core installations 1903, 1909, 2004. These Windows Server versions are pretty rare for a corporate environments and vulnerable desktops are not such a big problem. Well, yes, but can you guarantee that you do not have virtual machines with Windows 10 that are used as servers? You can only guarantee this with a good IT inventory process!\n\nWhat about other "Exploitation more likely" vulnerabilities? Well of course it's worth mentioning RCEs in Microsoft browsers (CVE-2020-1219): Internet Explorer 11 and Microsoft Edge. Also a lot of RCEs in VBScript (CVE-2020-1214, CVE-2020-1215, CVE-2020-1230, CVE-2020-1213, CVE-2020-1216, CVE-2020-1260). So, keep your web browser up-to-date and try not to click on suspicious links.\n\n## Other Product based (36)\n\n#### Microsoft SharePoint\n\n * Remote Code Execution ([CVE-2020-1181](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1181>))\n * Elevation of Privilege ([CVE-2020-1178](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1178>), [CVE-2020-1295](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1295>))\n * Cross Site Scripting ([CVE-2020-1177](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1177>), [CVE-2020-1183](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1183>), [CVE-2020-1297](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1297>), [CVE-2020-1298](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1298>), [CVE-2020-1318](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1318>), [CVE-2020-1320](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1320>))\n * Spoofing ([CVE-2020-1148](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1148>), [CVE-2020-1289](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1289>))\n * Open Redirect ([CVE-2020-1323](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1323>))\n\n#### Windows Kernel\n\n * Elevation of Privilege ([CVE-2020-0986](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-0986>), [CVE-2020-1237](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1237>), [CVE-2020-1246](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1246>), [CVE-2020-1262](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1262>), [CVE-2020-1264](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1264>), [CVE-2020-1266](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1266>), [CVE-2020-1269](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1269>), [CVE-2020-1273](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1273>), [CVE-2020-1274](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1274>), [CVE-2020-1275](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1275>), [CVE-2020-1276](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1276>), [CVE-2020-1307](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1307>), [CVE-2020-1310](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1310>), [CVE-2020-1316](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1316>))\n * Information Disclosure ([CVE-2020-1290](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1290>))\n\n#### Windows Runtime\n\n * Elevation of Privilege ([CVE-2020-1231](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1231>), [CVE-2020-1233](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1233>), [CVE-2020-1235](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1235>), [CVE-2020-1265](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1265>), [CVE-2020-1282](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1282>), [CVE-2020-1304](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1304>), [CVE-2020-1306](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1306>), [CVE-2020-1334](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1334>))\n * Information Disclosure ([CVE-2020-1217](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1217>))\n\nAmong the products with the biggest number of vulnerabilities, we can once again highlight Microsoft SharePoint, and especially Remote Code Execution (CVE-2020-1181). "An authenticated attacker can execute code as the application\u2019s pool process". Other vulnerabilities are the Elevation of Privilege and Information Disclosure in Windows Kernel and Windows Runtime.\n\n## Other Vulnerability Type based (78)\n\n#### Remote Code Execution\n\n * Chakra Scripting Engine ([CVE-2020-1073](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1073>))\n * GDI+ ([CVE-2020-1248](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1248>))\n * Jet Database Engine ([CVE-2020-1208](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1208>), [CVE-2020-1236](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1236>))\n * LNK ([CVE-2020-1299](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1299>))\n * Microsoft Excel ([CVE-2020-1225](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1225>), [CVE-2020-1226](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1226>))\n * Microsoft Office ([CVE-2020-1321](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1321>))\n * Windows ([CVE-2020-1300](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1300>))\n * Windows OLE ([CVE-2020-1281](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1281>))\n * Windows Shell ([CVE-2020-1286](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1286>))\n * Word for Android ([CVE-2020-1223](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1223>))\n\n#### Denial of Service\n\n * Connected User Experiences and Telemetry Service ([CVE-2020-1120](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1120>), [CVE-2020-1244](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1244>))\n * Windows ([CVE-2020-1283](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1283>))\n * Windows Registry ([CVE-2020-1194](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1194>))\n\n#### Memory Corruption\n\n * Media Foundation ([CVE-2020-1238](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1238>), [CVE-2020-1239](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1239>))\n\n#### Elevation of Privilege\n\n * Component Object Model ([CVE-2020-1311](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1311>))\n * Connected Devices Platform Service ([CVE-2020-1211](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1211>))\n * Diagnostic Hub Standard Collector ([CVE-2020-1202](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1202>), [CVE-2020-1203](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1203>))\n * Diagnostics Hub Standard Collector ([CVE-2020-1257](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1257>), [CVE-2020-1278](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1278>), [CVE-2020-1293](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1293>))\n * DirectX ([CVE-2020-1258](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1258>))\n * Group Policy ([CVE-2020-1317](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1317>))\n * Microsoft Store Runtime ([CVE-2020-1222](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1222>), [CVE-2020-1309](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1309>))\n * Microsoft Windows Defender ([CVE-2020-1163](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1163>), [CVE-2020-1170](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1170>))\n * OLE Automation ([CVE-2020-1212](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1212>))\n * OpenSSH for Windows ([CVE-2020-1292](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1292>))\n * Windows ([CVE-2020-1162](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1162>), [CVE-2020-1324](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1324>))\n * Windows Background Intelligent Transfer Service ([CVE-2020-1255](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1255>))\n * Windows Backup Service ([CVE-2020-1271](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1271>))\n * Windows Bluetooth Service ([CVE-2020-1280](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1280>))\n * Windows Error Reporting ([CVE-2020-1234](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1234>))\n * Windows Error Reporting Manager ([CVE-2020-1197](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1197>))\n * Windows Feedback Hub ([CVE-2020-1199](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1199>))\n * Windows GDI ([CVE-2020-0915](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-0915>), [CVE-2020-0916](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-0916>))\n * Windows Installer ([CVE-2020-1272](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1272>), [CVE-2020-1277](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1277>), [CVE-2020-1302](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1302>), [CVE-2020-1312](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1312>))\n * Windows Lockscreen ([CVE-2020-1279](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1279>))\n * Windows Mobile Device Management Diagnostics ([CVE-2020-1204](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1204>))\n * Windows Modules Installer Service ([CVE-2020-1254](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1254>))\n * Windows Network Connections Service ([CVE-2020-1291](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1291>))\n * Windows Network List Service ([CVE-2020-1209](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1209>))\n * Windows Now Playing Session Manager ([CVE-2020-1201](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1201>))\n * Windows Print Configuration ([CVE-2020-1196](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1196>))\n * Windows State Repository Service ([CVE-2020-1305](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1305>))\n * Windows Text Service Framework ([CVE-2020-1314](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1314>))\n * Windows Update Orchestrator Service ([CVE-2020-1313](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1313>))\n * Windows WLAN Service ([CVE-2020-1270](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1270>))\n * Windows WalletService ([CVE-2020-1287](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1287>), [CVE-2020-1294](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1294>))\n\n#### Security Feature Bypass\n\n * Microsoft Outlook ([CVE-2020-1229](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1229>))\n * Windows Host Guardian Service ([CVE-2020-1259](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1259>))\n\n#### Information Disclosure\n\n * Internet Explorer ([CVE-2020-1315](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1315>))\n * Media Foundation ([CVE-2020-1232](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1232>))\n * Microsoft Edge ([CVE-2020-1242](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1242>))\n * Microsoft Graphics Component ([CVE-2020-1160](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1160>))\n * Microsoft Project ([CVE-2020-1322](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1322>))\n * Visual Studio Code Live Share ([CVE-2020-1343](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1343>))\n * Windows Diagnostics & feedback ([CVE-2020-1296](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1296>))\n * Windows Error Reporting ([CVE-2020-1261](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1261>), [CVE-2020-1263](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1263>))\n * Windows GDI ([CVE-2020-1348](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1348>))\n * Windows Service ([CVE-2020-1268](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1268>))\n\n#### Spoofing\n\n * Microsoft Bing Search ([CVE-2020-1329](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1329>))\n * Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) in IE Mode ([CVE-2020-1220](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1220>))\n * NuGetGallery ([CVE-2020-1340](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1340>))\n * System Center Operations Manager ([CVE-2020-1331](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1331>))\n\n#### Code Injection\n\n * Azure DevOps Server ([CVE-2020-1327](<https://portal.msrc.microsoft.com/en-US/security-guidance/advisory/CVE-2020-1327>))\n\nAmong other vulnerabilities, the most important are the various RCEs. \n\n * 2 RCE in Microsoft Excel (CVE-2020-1225, CVE-2020-1226). This might be interesting for phishing.\n * Yet another RCE in LNK file processing (CVE-2020-1299). This is the third this year.\n * RCE in Windows CAB files processing (CVE-2020-1300). Quote from zdi: the attackers "could also spoof a network printer and dupe a user into installing the specially crafted CAB file disguised as a printer driver. Users are often conditioned into trusting printer drivers when offered one, so it would not be surprising to see this get exploited".\n * VM vendors also pay attention to RCE in Chakra Scripting Engine (CVE-2020-1073), GDI+ (CVE-2020-1248), Jet Database Engine (CVE-2020-1208, CVE-2020-1236), Windows OLE (CVE-2020-1281) and Windows Shell (CVE-2020-1286).\n\nWhat else besides RCEs?\n\n * Nice Denial of Service in Windows Registry, but "an attacker would need access to the system in order to launch a crafted application to exploit this flaw."\n * A lot of Elevation of Privilege, but VM vendors highlight only vulnerabilities in OpenSSH for Windows (CVE-2020-1292) and Windows GDI (CVE-2020-0915, CVE-2020-0916).\n * Security Feature Bypass in Microsoft Outlook (CVE-2020-1229). It may "allow attackers to automatically load remote images \u2013 even from within the Preview Pane" and may be used with GDI+ RCE.\n * Among Information Disclosure vulnerabilities, ZDI highlights vulnerabilities in Microsoft Edge (CVE-2020-1242) and in Windows Diagnostics & feedback (CVE-2020-1296).\n\n## In conclusion\n\nIt's rather interesting month, but the focus is still mainly on SMB RCE vulnerabilities and the possible use of these vulnerabilities in malware attacks.\n\n", "modified": "2020-06-23T01:31:46", "published": "2020-06-23T01:31:46", "id": "AVLEONOV:24538B1ED96269982136AA43998E5780", "href": "http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/avleonov/~3/wWMcz38Q7hQ/", "type": "avleonov", "title": "Microsoft Patch Tuesday June 2020: The Bleeding Ghost of SMB", "cvss": {"score": 9.3, "vector": "AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C"}}]}
