7.5 High
CVSS2
Attack Vector
NETWORK
Attack Complexity
LOW
Authentication
NONE
Confidentiality Impact
PARTIAL
Integrity Impact
PARTIAL
Availability Impact
PARTIAL
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
0.135 Low
EPSS
Percentile
95.6%
The Internet Software Consortium (ISC) has discovered several buffer overflow vulnerabilities in their implementation of DHCP (ISC DHCPD). These vulnerabilities may allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected systems. At this time, we are not aware of any exploits.
There are multiple remote buffer overflow vulnerabilities in the ISC implementation of DHCP. As described in RFC 2131, “the Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol (DHCP) provides a framework for passing configuration information to hosts on a TCP/IP network.” In addition to supplying hosts with network configuration data, ISC DHCPD allows the DHCP server to dynamically update a DNS server, obviating the need for manual updates to the name server configuration. Support for dynamic DNS updates is provided by the NSUPDATE feature.
During an internal source code audit, developers from the ISC discovered several vulnerabilities in the error handling routines of the minires library, which is used by NSUPDATE to resolve hostnames. These vulnerabilities are stack-based buffer overflows that may be exploitable by sending a DHCP message containing a large hostname value. _Note: Although the minires library is derived from the BIND 8 resolver library, these vulnerabilities do not affect any current versions of BIND. _
Remote attackers may be able to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the user running ISC DHCPD.
Upgrade or apply a patch
The ISC has addressed these vulnerabilities in versions 3.0pl2 and 3.0.1RC11 of ISC DHCPD. If your software vendor supplies ISC DHCPD as part of an operating system distribution, please see the vendor section of this document.
Disable dynamic DNS updates (NSUPDATE)
As an interim measure, the ISC recommends disabling the NSUPDATE feature on affected DHCP servers.
Block external access to DHCP server ports
As an interim measure, it is possible to limit exposure to these vulnerabilities by restricting external access to affected DHCP servers on the following ports:
bootps 67/tcp # Bootstrap Protocol Server bootps 67/udp # Bootstrap Protocol Server bootpc 68/tcp # Bootstrap Protocol Client bootpc 68/udp # Bootstrap Protocol Client
Disable the DHCP service
As a general rule, the CERT/CC recommends disabling any service or capability that is not explicitly required. Depending on your network configuration, you may not need to use DHCP.
284857
Filter by status: All Affected Not Affected Unknown
Filter by content: __ Additional information available
__ Sort by: Status Alphabetical
Expand all
Javascript is disabled. Click here to view vendors.
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Affected
This vulnerability is addressed by the M431-001 and M500-004 patches for the 4.3.1 and 5.0 versions of BSD/OS.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 28, 2003
Affected
We have not received a statement from the vendor.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
Conectiva has published Conectiva Linux Security Advisory CLSA-2003:562 to address this issue. For more information, please see
http://distro.conectiva.com/atualizacoes/?id=a&anuncio=000562
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 20, 2003
Affected
Debian has updated their distribution with DSA 231.
For the stable distribution (woody) this problem has been fixed in version 3.0+3.0.1rc9-2.1.
The old stable distribution (potato) does not contain dhcp3 packages.
For the unstable distribution (sid) this problem has been fixed in version 3.0+3.0.1rc11-1.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
Debian Security Advisory DSA 231 is available at:
http://www.debian.org/security/2003/dsa-231
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: January 17, 2003 Updated: January 20, 2003
Affected
We have not received a statement from the vendor.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
Gentoo Linux has addressed this issue in Security Announcement 200301-10. For more details, see
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?t=30721
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 16, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Affected
We have a patched version of 3.0 available (3.0pl2) and a new release candidate for the next bug-fix release (3.0.1RC11). Both of these new releases are available from http://www.isc.org/products/DHCP/.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 20, 2003
Affected
We have not received a statement from the vendor.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
MandrakeSoft has address this vulnerability in Security Advisory MDKSA-2003:007, available at
http://www.mandrakesecure.net/en/advisories/advisory.php?name=MDKSA-2003:007
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: January 16, 2003 Updated: January 20, 2003
Affected
We have not received a statement from the vendor.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
OpenPKG has addressed this issue in Security Advisory OpenPKG-SA-2003.002, available at
http://www.openpkg.org/security/OpenPKG-SA-2003.002-dhcpd.html
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Affected
Red Hat distributes a vulnerable version of ISC DHCP in Red Hat Linux 8.0. Other distributions of Red Hat Linux are not vulnerable to these issues. New DHCP packages are available along with our advisory at the URL below. Users of the Red Hat Network can update their systems using the ‘up2date’ tool.
_<http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2003-011.html>_
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: January 19, 2003 Updated: January 21, 2003
Affected
We have not received a statement from the vendor.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
Slackware has addressed this issue by releasing new DHCP packages for Slackware 8.1 . For more information, please see
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 20, 2003
Affected
We are preparing updates, that will be released soon.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
SuSE has addressed this issue in Security Announcement SuSE-SA:2003:0006, available at
http://www.suse.de/de/security/2003_006_dhcp.html
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: March 26, 2003
Not Affected
Following CERT advisory CA-2003-01 on security vulnerabilities in the ISC DHCP implementation, Alcatel has conducted an immediate assessment to determine any impact this may have on our portfolio. A first analysis has shown that none of our products is impacted. The security of our customers’ networks is of highest priority for Alcatel. Therefore we continue to test our product portfolio against potential ISC DHCP security vulnerabilities and will provide updates if necessary.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
This statement was provided by Alcatel on February 24, 2003.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Not Affected
Mac OS X and Mac OS X Server do not contain the vulnerability described in this notice.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Not Affected
No Cisco products have been found to be affected by this vulnerability.
Several Cisco products do utilize the ISC DHCPD, however, no Cisco products implement the ISC DHCPD NSUPDATE feature, nor do they include the minires library.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Not Affected
Cray Inc. is not vulnerable as dhcpd is not supported on any of its products.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 20, 2003
Not Affected
Fujitsu’s UXP/V OS is not vulnerable because it does not support the ISC DHCPD.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Not Affected
Source: Hewlett-Packard Company Software Security Response Team
cross reference id: SSRT2423
HP-UX - not vulnerable
HP-MPE/ix - not vulnerable
HP Tru64 UNIX - not vulnerable
HP OpenVMS - not vulnerable
HP NonStop Servers - not vulnerable
To report potential security vulnerabilities in HP software, send an E-mail message to: mailto:[email protected]
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: January 07, 2003 Updated: January 15, 2003
Not Affected
We’ve checked up on our router (Hitachi,Ltd. GR2000 series) about [VU#284857]. Our DHCP implementation is NOT vulnerable.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Not Affected
IBM’s AIX does not ship with the ISC DHCP daemon. The issues discussed in VU#284857 or any following advisories based on this vulnerability note do not pertain to AIX.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: January 15, 2003 Updated: March 25, 2003
Not Affected
Ingrian Networks products are not vulnerable to VU#284857.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 28, 2003
Not Affected
Microsoft products do not use the libraries in question. Microsoft products are not affected by this vulnerability.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Not Affected
None of MontaVista Software’s Linux products are vulnerable to this issue.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Not Affected
[Server Products]
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Not Affected
Currently supported versions of NetBSD do not contain the error handling routine vulnerabilities. Such vulnerabilities were fixed prior to the release of NetBSD 1.5.
With respect to the patch to ns_name.c, we believe that this is good defensive programming and have applied the patch to NetBSD-current. However, all calls to ns_name_ntol in the NetBSD source base pass a correct, constant, non-zero value as the datsiz parameter.
Therefore, NetBSD is not vulnerable.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: January 08, 2003 Updated: January 15, 2003
Not Affected
NetScreen is not vulnerable to this issue.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Not Affected
OpenBSD’s dhcp support is much modified, does not have that feature, and therefore does not have that bug.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Not Affected
Openwall GNU/*/Linux is not vulnerable. We don’t yet provide a DHCP suite.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: January 07, 2003 Updated: January 15, 2003
Not Affected
Riverstone Networks is not vulnerable to VU#284857.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Not Affected
Sun confirms that we are not vulnerable to the issues described in VU#284857. Solaris does not ship the ISC DHCPD and does not use any of the ISC DHCPD source in its version of DHCPD.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: March 26, 2003
Not Affected
A response to this advisory is available from our web site: http://www.xerox.com/security.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Unknown
We have not received a statement from the vendor.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Unknown
We have not received a statement from the vendor.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Unknown
We have not received a statement from the vendor.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Unknown
We have not received a statement from the vendor.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Unknown
We have not received a statement from the vendor.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Unknown
We have not received a statement from the vendor.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Unknown
We have not received a statement from the vendor.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Unknown
We have not received a statement from the vendor.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Unknown
We have not received a statement from the vendor.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Unknown
We have not received a statement from the vendor.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Unknown
We have not received a statement from the vendor.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Unknown
We have not received a statement from the vendor.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Unknown
We have not received a statement from the vendor.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: January 15, 2003 Updated: January 15, 2003
Unknown
We have not received a statement from the vendor.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Unknown
We have not received a statement from the vendor.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Unknown
We have not received a statement from the vendor.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Unknown
We have not received a statement from the vendor.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: January 07, 2003 Updated: January 15, 2003
Unknown
We have not received a statement from the vendor.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Unknown
We have not received a statement from the vendor.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Unknown
We have not received a statement from the vendor.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Unknown
We have not received a statement from the vendor.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Unknown
We have not received a statement from the vendor.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Unknown
We have not received a statement from the vendor.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Unknown
We have not received a statement from the vendor.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Unknown
We have not received a statement from the vendor.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
Notified: November 26, 2002 Updated: January 15, 2003
Unknown
We have not received a statement from the vendor.
The vendor has not provided us with any further information regarding this vulnerability.
The CERT/CC has no additional comments at this time.
If you have feedback, comments, or additional information about this vulnerability, please send us [email](<mailto:[email protected]?Subject=VU%23284857 Feedback>).
View all 55 vendors __View less vendors __
Group | Score | Vector |
---|---|---|
Base | ||
Temporal | ||
Environmental |
The CERT Coordination Center thanks David Hankins of the Internet Software Consortium for notifying us about this problem and for helping us to construct this document. We also thank Jacques A. Vidrine for drawing attention to this issue.
This document was written by Jeffrey P. Lanza.
CVE IDs: | CVE-2003-0026 |
---|---|
CERT Advisory: | CA-2003-01 Severity Metric: |