Lucene search

K
attackerkbAttackerKBAKB:E2B9F961-5F1F-496F-97F1-1CF8968AE023
HistoryJun 09, 2020 - 12:00 a.m.

CVE-2020-1301 Windows SMB Remote Code Execution Vulnerability

2020-06-0900:00:00
attackerkb.com
19

8.8 High

CVSS3

Attack Vector

NETWORK

Attack Complexity

LOW

Privileges Required

LOW

User Interaction

NONE

Scope

UNCHANGED

Confidentiality Impact

HIGH

Integrity Impact

HIGH

Availability Impact

HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

6.5 Medium

CVSS2

Access Vector

NETWORK

Access Complexity

LOW

Authentication

SINGLE

Confidentiality Impact

PARTIAL

Integrity Impact

PARTIAL

Availability Impact

PARTIAL

AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P

A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the Microsoft Server Message Block 1.0 (SMBv1) server handles certain requests, aka ‘Windows SMB Remote Code Execution Vulnerability’.

Recent assessments:

gwillcox-r7 at June 10, 2020 12:14am UTC reported:

To add to @busterb’s assessment, another thing to consider is that SMBv1, which this vulnerability relies on, is disabled by default on Windows 10 (Build 1803) according to <https://www.petenetlive.com/KB/Article/0001461&gt;. This is further confirmed on Microsoft’s official website at <https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/storage/file-server/troubleshoot/smbv1-not-installed-by-default-in-windows&gt; where they state that SMBv1 is not installed by default on Windows 10 version 1709 and later and Windows Server version 1709 and later.

Considering the push from Microsoft to force Windows 10 users to automatically upgrade, and the fact that according to <https://gs.statcounter.com/os-version-market-share/windows/desktop/worldwide&gt;, 72.96% of Windows users are running Windows 10, the chances are that unless your in an environment where you need to support older software, SMBv1 is most likely going to be disabled.

Exploitability will most likely be difficult given the past history of SMB vulnerabilities, but may be easier on older versions of Windows such as Windows 7 that have not introduced the modern mitigations that Windows 10 has, particularly in the area of heap randomization.

busterb at June 09, 2020 7:23pm UTC reported:

To add to @busterb’s assessment, another thing to consider is that SMBv1, which this vulnerability relies on, is disabled by default on Windows 10 (Build 1803) according to <https://www.petenetlive.com/KB/Article/0001461&gt;. This is further confirmed on Microsoft’s official website at <https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/storage/file-server/troubleshoot/smbv1-not-installed-by-default-in-windows&gt; where they state that SMBv1 is not installed by default on Windows 10 version 1709 and later and Windows Server version 1709 and later.

Considering the push from Microsoft to force Windows 10 users to automatically upgrade, and the fact that according to <https://gs.statcounter.com/os-version-market-share/windows/desktop/worldwide&gt;, 72.96% of Windows users are running Windows 10, the chances are that unless your in an environment where you need to support older software, SMBv1 is most likely going to be disabled.

Exploitability will most likely be difficult given the past history of SMB vulnerabilities, but may be easier on older versions of Windows such as Windows 7 that have not introduced the modern mitigations that Windows 10 has, particularly in the area of heap randomization.

Assessed Attacker Value: 3
Assessed Attacker Value: 3Assessed Attacker Value: 2

8.8 High

CVSS3

Attack Vector

NETWORK

Attack Complexity

LOW

Privileges Required

LOW

User Interaction

NONE

Scope

UNCHANGED

Confidentiality Impact

HIGH

Integrity Impact

HIGH

Availability Impact

HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

6.5 Medium

CVSS2

Access Vector

NETWORK

Access Complexity

LOW

Authentication

SINGLE

Confidentiality Impact

PARTIAL

Integrity Impact

PARTIAL

Availability Impact

PARTIAL

AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P