Lucene search

K
attackerkbAttackerKBAKB:12F253E0-F6F2-4628-A989-57A36E8C7026
HistoryJan 02, 2023 - 12:00 a.m.

CVE-2022-42475

2023-01-0200:00:00
attackerkb.com
39

9.8 High

CVSS3

Attack Vector

NETWORK

Attack Complexity

LOW

Privileges Required

NONE

User Interaction

NONE

Scope

UNCHANGED

Confidentiality Impact

HIGH

Integrity Impact

HIGH

Availability Impact

HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

7.5 High

CVSS2

Access Vector

NETWORK

Access Complexity

LOW

Authentication

NONE

Confidentiality Impact

PARTIAL

Integrity Impact

PARTIAL

Availability Impact

PARTIAL

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

0.387 Low

EPSS

Percentile

96.8%

A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability [CWE-122] in FortiOS SSL-VPN 7.2.0 through 7.2.2, 7.0.0 through 7.0.8, 6.4.0 through 6.4.10, 6.2.0 through 6.2.11, 6.0.15 and earlier and FortiProxy SSL-VPN 7.2.0 through 7.2.1, 7.0.7 and earlier may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via specifically crafted requests.

Recent assessments:

ccondon-r7 at December 13, 2022 2:02pm UTC reported:

Heap-based buffer overflow in the sslvpnd component of Fortinet SSL VPNs. Fortinet disclosed publicly on December 12 with a note that it had been exploited in the wild, evidently after putting out a private warning to customers the week prior. Since then, thereโ€™s been community discussion about whether this was exploited as 0day or not, as the vendor evidently silently patched the vuln roughly two weeks before public disclosure (giving attackers plenty of time to reverse the patch before many customers were aware there was a problem).

Heap-based BOF probably isnโ€™t quite as easily exploitable as, say, a stack-based cousin. Even if this wasnโ€™t true 0day, my bets are on an advanced and/or state-sponsored threat actor being the culprit for initial exploitation. Not sure weโ€™ll see mass exploitation right away, or even at allโ€ฆunless of course someone figures out where the bug lives and develops a public exploit, in which case, the exploitability rating on this will ratchet up. The attacker value of compromising a Fortinet device is high enough to motivate folks.

Assessed Attacker Value: 5
Assessed Attacker Value: 5Assessed Attacker Value: 3

9.8 High

CVSS3

Attack Vector

NETWORK

Attack Complexity

LOW

Privileges Required

NONE

User Interaction

NONE

Scope

UNCHANGED

Confidentiality Impact

HIGH

Integrity Impact

HIGH

Availability Impact

HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

7.5 High

CVSS2

Access Vector

NETWORK

Access Complexity

LOW

Authentication

NONE

Confidentiality Impact

PARTIAL

Integrity Impact

PARTIAL

Availability Impact

PARTIAL

AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P

0.387 Low

EPSS

Percentile

96.8%